e497
Table of Contents

This prospectus supplement relates to an effective registration statement under the Securities Act of 1933, but is not complete and may be changed. This preliminary prospectus supplement and the accompanying preliminary prospectus are not an offer to sell and are not soliciting offers to buy these securities in any jurisdiction where such offer or sale is not permitted.
 
SUBJECT TO COMPLETION, DATED JUNE 20, 2011
Filed Pursuant to Rule 497
Registration Statement No. 333-166012
 
PRELIMINARY PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT
(to Prospectus dated March 31, 2011)
 
Fifth Street Finance Corp.
 
5,000,000 Shares
 
Common Stock
 
 
 
 
We are offering 5,000,000 shares of our common stock. We are a specialty finance company that lends to and invests in small and mid-sized companies, primarily in connection with investments by private equity sponsors. Our investment objective is to maximize our portfolio’s total return by generating current income from our debt investments and capital appreciation from our equity investments.
 
We are an externally managed, closed-end, non-diversified management investment company that has elected to be treated as a business development company under the Investment Company Act of 1940. We are managed by Fifth Street Management LLC.
 
Our common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “FSC.” On June 17, 2011 and March 31, 2011, the last reported sale price of our common stock on the New York Stock Exchange was $11.83 and $13.35, respectively. We are required to determine the net asset value per share of our common stock on a quarterly basis. Our net asset value per share of our common stock as of March 31, 2011 was $10.68.
 
Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk and should be considered highly speculative. See “Supplementary Risk Factors” beginning on page S-7 of this prospectus supplement and “Risk Factors” beginning on page 12 of the accompanying prospectus to read about factors you should consider, including the risk of leverage, before investing in our common stock.
 
This prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus contain important information about us that a prospective investor should know before investing in our common stock. Please read this prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus before investing and keep them for future reference. We file periodic reports, current reports, proxy statements and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission. This information is available free of charge by contacting us at 10 Bank Street, 12th Floor, White Plains, New York 10606 or by telephone at (914) 286-6800 or on our website at www.fifthstreetfinance.com. Information contained on our website is not incorporated by reference into this prospectus supplement or the accompanying prospectus, and you should not consider that information to be part of this prospectus supplement or the accompanying prospectus. The Securities and Exchange Commission also maintains a website at www.sec.gov that contains information about us.
                 
    Per Share     Total  
 
Public offering price
  $           $          
Sales load (underwriting discount)
  $       $    
Proceeds, before expenses, to us(1)
  $       $  
 
 
(1) We estimate that we will incur approximately $600,000 (or $0.12 per share of the shares sold in this offering) of expenses relating to this offering, resulting in net proceeds, after sales load (underwriting discount) and expenses, to us of approximately $      million (or $      per share of the shares sold in this offering).
 
The underwriters expect to deliver the shares on or about          , 2011.
 
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of these securities or determined if this prospectus supplement or the accompanying prospectus is truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
 
We have granted the underwriters an option, exercisable at any time until 30 days after the date of this prospectus supplement, to purchase up to 750,000 additional shares of our common stock to cover over-allotments of shares.
 
UBS Investment Bank RBC Capital Markets Deutsche Bank Securities
 
The date of this prospectus supplement is          , 2011.


 

 
TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT
 
         
    Page
 
    S-ii  
    S-1  
    S-5  
Supplementary Risk Factors
    S-7  
    S-9  
    S-10  
Selected Financial Data
    S-11  
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
    S-12  
    S-36  
    S-42  
    S-42  
    S-42  
    S-42  
    S-43  
 
PROSPECTUS
 
         
    Page
 
Prospectus Summary
    1  
The Offering
    5  
Fees and Expenses
    9  
Selected Financial and Other Data
    11  
Risk Factors
    12  
Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
    28  
Use of Proceeds
    29  
Price Range of Common Stock and Distributions
    30  
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
    32  
Business
    57  
Portfolio Companies
    69  
Management
    74  
Portfolio Management
    84  
Investment Advisory Agreement
    86  
Administration Agreement
    93  
License Agreement
    93  
Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions
    94  
Control Persons and Principal Stockholders
    95  
Dividend Reinvestment Plan
    97  
Description of Our Capital Stock
    98  
Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations
    101  
Regulation
    109  
Plan of Distribution
    114  
Custodian, Transfer and Distribution Paying Agent and Registrar
    115  
Brokerage Allocation and Other Practices
    115  
Legal Matters
    115  
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
    115  
Change in Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
    115  
Available Information
    116  
Privacy Notice
    116  
Index to Financial Statements
    F-1  


S-i


Table of Contents

 
ABOUT THIS PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT
 
You should rely only on the information contained in this prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus. Neither we nor the underwriters have authorized any other person to provide you with different information from that contained in this prospectus supplement or the accompanying prospectus. If anyone provides you with different or inconsistent information, you should not rely on it. Neither this prospectus supplement nor the accompanying prospectus constitutes an offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy, any shares of our common stock by any person in any jurisdiction where it is unlawful for that person to make such an offer or solicitation or to any person in any jurisdiction to whom it is unlawful to make such an offer or solicitation. The information contained in this prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus is complete and accurate only as of their respective dates, regardless of the time of their delivery or sale of our common stock. Our financial condition, results of operations and prospects may have changed since those dates. To the extent required by law, we will amend or supplement the information contained in this prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus to reflect any material changes to such information subsequent to the date of this prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus and prior to the completion of any offering pursuant to this prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus.
 
This document is in two parts. The first part is this prospectus supplement, which describes the terms of this offering of common stock and also adds to and updates information contained in the accompanying prospectus. The second part is the accompanying prospectus, which gives more general information and disclosure. To the extent the information contained in this prospectus supplement differs from or is additional to the information contained in the accompanying prospectus, you should rely only on the information contained in this prospectus supplement. You should read this prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus together with the additional information described under the heading “Available Information” before investing in our common stock.
 
Forward-Looking Statements
 
Information contained in this prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus may contain forward-looking statements. In addition, forward-looking statements can generally be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “may,” “will,” “expect,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” or “continue” or the negative thereof or other variations thereon or comparable terminology. The matters described in “Supplementary Risk Factors” in this prospectus supplement and “Risk Factors” in the accompanying prospectus and certain other factors noted throughout this prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus constitute cautionary statements identifying important factors with respect to any such forward-looking statements, including certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in such forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements contained in this prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus are excluded from the safe harbor protection provided by Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, or the Securities Act. For a list of factors that could affect these forward-looking statements, see “Supplementary Risk Factors” in this prospectus supplement and “Risk Factors” and “Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” in the accompanying prospectus.


S-ii


Table of Contents

 
PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT SUMMARY
 
This summary highlights some of the information in this prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus. It is not complete and may not contain all of the information that is important to you. To understand the terms of the common stock offered pursuant to this prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus, you should read the entire prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus carefully. Together, these documents describe the specific terms of the shares we are offering. Except as otherwise noted, all information in this prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus assumes no exercise of the underwriters’ over-allotment option.
 
We commenced operations on February 15, 2007 as Fifth Street Mezzanine Partners III, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership. Effective as of January 2, 2008, Fifth Street Mezzanine Partners III, L.P. merged with and into Fifth Street Finance Corp., a Delaware corporation. Unless otherwise noted, the terms “we,” “us,” “our” and “Fifth Street” refer to Fifth Street Mezzanine Partners III, L.P. prior to the merger date and Fifth Street Finance Corp. on and after the merger date. In addition, the terms “Fifth Street Management” and “investment adviser” refer to Fifth Street Management LLC, our external investment adviser.
 
Fifth Street Finance Corp.
 
We are a specialty finance company that lends to and invests in small and mid-sized companies, primarily in connection with investments by private equity sponsors. We define small and mid-sized companies as those with annual revenues between $25 million and $250 million. Our investment objective is to maximize our portfolio’s total return by generating current income from our debt investments and capital appreciation from our equity investments. We are externally managed and advised by Fifth Street Management. Fifth Street Management is an affiliate of Fifth Street Capital LLC, a private investment firm founded and managed by our chief executive officer, and Fifth Street Management’s managing partner, Leonard M. Tannenbaum, who has led the investment of over $1.5 billion in small and mid-sized companies, including the investments made by Fifth Street, since 1998.
 
Our investments generally range in size from $5 million to $75 million and are principally in the form of first and second lien debt investments, which may also include an equity component. We are currently focusing our origination efforts on first lien loans. We believe that the risk-adjusted returns from these loans are superior to second lien investments and offer superior credit quality. However, we may choose to originate additional second lien and unsecured loans in the future.
 
We are an externally managed, closed-end, non-diversified management investment company that has elected to be treated as a business development company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, or the 1940 Act. As a business development company, we are required to comply with regulatory requirements, including limitations on our use of debt. We are permitted to, and expect to, finance our investments through borrowings. However, as a business development company, we are only generally allowed to borrow amounts such that our asset coverage, as defined in the 1940 Act, equals at least 200% after such borrowing. The amount of leverage that we employ will depend on our assessment of market conditions and other factors at the time of any proposed borrowing.
 
We have also elected to be treated for federal income tax purposes as a regulated investment company, or RIC, under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code, or the Code. As a RIC, we generally will not have to pay corporate-level federal income taxes on any net ordinary income or capital gains that we distribute to our stockholders if we meet certain source-of-income, distribution and asset diversification requirements.
 
In addition, we maintain a wholly-owned subsidiary that is licensed as a small business investment company, or SBIC, and regulated by the Small Business Administration, or the SBA. The SBIC license allows us, through our wholly-owned subsidiary, to issue SBA-guaranteed debentures. We received exemptive relief from the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, to permit us to exclude the debt of our SBIC subsidiary guaranteed by the SBA from the definition of senior securities in the 200% asset coverage ratio we are required to maintain under the 1940 Act.


S-1


Table of Contents

Our Corporate Information
 
Our principal executive offices are located at 10 Bank Street, 12th Floor, White Plains, NY 10606 and our telephone number is (914) 286-6800. We maintain a website on the Internet at www.fifthstreetfinance.com. Information contained on our website is not incorporated by reference into this prospectus supplement or the accompanying prospectus and you should not consider information contained on our website to be part of this prospectus supplement or the accompanying prospectus.
 
Recent Developments
 
On April 12, 2011, we closed a private offering of $150 million aggregate principal amount of our 5.375% convertible senior notes due 2016. These convertible senior notes were sold only to qualified institutional buyers (as defined in the Securities Act) pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act. In addition, Leonard M. Tannenbaum, our chief executive officer, purchased $2 million principal amount of the convertible senior notes directly from us in a private placement.
 
The convertible senior notes are unsecured and bear interest at a rate of 5.375% per year, payable semiannually. In certain circumstances, or at any time on or after January 1, 2016, the convertible senior notes are convertible into shares of our common stock at a conversion rate of 67.7415 shares of common stock per $1,000 principal amount of convertible senior notes, which is equivalent to a conversion price of approximately $14.76 per share of our common stock. The conversion rate is subject to customary anti-dilution adjustments, including for any cash dividends or distributions paid on shares of our common stock in excess of the monthly dividend of $ 0.1066 per share we are currently paying on our common stock. In addition, if certain corporate events occur in respect of us, holders of the convertible senior notes may require us to repurchase for cash all or part of their convertible senior notes at a repurchase price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the convertible senior notes to be repurchased, plus accrued and unpaid interest through, but excluding, the required repurchase date. We do not have the right to redeem the convertible senior notes prior to maturity. The convertible senior notes will mature on April 1, 2016, unless repurchased or converted in accordance with their terms prior to such date.
 
On May 27, 2011, we received a letter from the Investment Division of the Small Business Administration, or the SBA, that invited us to continue moving forward with our application for a second small business investment company, or SBIC, license. This license would enable us to issue up to an additional $75 million of SBA-guaranteed debentures, subject to us receiving an SBA capital commitment. Although our application for this license is subject to the SBA’s approval, we remain cautiously optimistic that we will complete the licensing process.
 
As of June 20, 2011, we had no outstanding borrowings under our three-year $100 million secured credit facility, or the Wells Fargo facility, with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, successor to Wachovia Bank, N.A., and had $28.0 million of outstanding borrowings under our three-year $215 million secured syndicated revolving credit facility, or the ING facility, with certain lenders party thereto from time to time and ING Capital LLC, as administrative agent.


S-2


Table of Contents

About the Offering
 
Common stock offered by us 5,000,000 shares
 
Common stock outstanding prior to this offering 66,761,996 shares
 
Common stock to be outstanding after this offering (assuming no exercise of the underwriters’ over-allotment option) 71,761,996 shares
 
Over-allotment option 750,000 shares
 
Use of proceeds We intend to use substantially all of the net proceeds from this offering to make investments in small and mid-sized companies in accordance with our investment objective and strategies described in this prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus and for general corporate purposes, including working capital requirements. We may also use a portion of the net proceeds from this offering to repay any outstanding borrowings under our credit facilities. Pending these uses, we will invest the net proceeds primarily in high quality, short-term debt securities, consistent with our business development company election and our election to be taxed as a RIC, at yields significantly below those we expect to earn on investments in small and mid-sized companies.
 
New York Stock Exchange symbol FSC
 
Investment advisory fees Fifth Street Management serves as our investment adviser. We pay Fifth Street Management a fee for its services under the investment advisory agreement, consisting of two components — a base management fee and an incentive fee. The base management fee is calculated at an annual rate of 2% of our gross assets, which includes any borrowings for investment purposes. From and after January 1, 2010, our investment adviser permanently waived the portion of the base management fee attributable to cash and cash equivalents (as defined in the notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements). The incentive fee consists of two parts. The first part is calculated and payable quarterly in arrears and equals 20% of our “Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income” for the immediately preceding quarter, subject to a preferred return, or “hurdle,” and a “catch up” feature. The second part is determined and payable in arrears as of the end of each fiscal year (or upon termination of the investment advisory agreement) and equals 20% of our “Incentive Fee Capital Gains,” which equals our realized capital gains on a cumulative basis from inception through the end of the year, if any, computed net of all realized capital losses and unrealized capital depreciation on a cumulative basis, less the aggregate amount of any previously paid capital gain incentive fee.
 
Administration agreement FSC, Inc. serves as our administrator. We reimburse FSC, Inc. the allocable portion of overhead and other expenses incurred by it in performing its obligations under the administration agreement, including rent and our allocable portion of the costs of compensation and related expenses of our chief financial officer and his staff, and the staff of our chief compliance officer.


S-3


Table of Contents

 
Distributions We intend to pay monthly distributions to our stockholders out of assets legally available for distribution. Our distributions, if any, will be determined by our Board of Directors.
 
On May 2, 2011, our Board of Directors declared the following dividends:
 
• $0.1066 per share, payable on July 29, 2011 to stockholders of record on July 1, 2011;
 
• $0.1066 per share, payable on August 31, 2011 to stockholders of record on August 1, 2011; and
 
• $0.1066 per share, payable on September 30, 2011 to stockholders of record on September 1, 2011.
 
Taxation We elected to be treated for federal income tax purposes as a RIC under Subchapter M of the Code. Accordingly, we generally will not pay corporate-level federal income taxes on any net ordinary income or capital gains that we currently distribute to our stockholders. To maintain our RIC tax treatment, we must meet specified source-of-income and asset diversification requirements and distribute annually at least 90% of our net ordinary income and realized net short-term capital gains in excess of realized net long-term capital losses, if any. Depending on the level of taxable income earned in a tax year, we may choose to carry forward taxable income in excess of current year distributions into the next tax year and pay a 4% excise tax on such income. Any such carryover taxable income must be distributed through a dividend declared prior to timely filing the final tax return related to the year which generated such taxable income.
 
Risk factors Your investment in our common stock involves a high degree of risk and should be considered highly speculative. See “Supplementary Risk Factors” in this prospectus supplement and “Risk Factors” in the accompanying prospectus for a discussion of factors you should carefully consider, including the risk of leverage, before investing in our common stock.


S-4


Table of Contents

 
FEES AND EXPENSES
 
The following table is intended to assist you in understanding the costs and expenses that an investor in our common stock will bear directly or indirectly. We caution you that some of the percentages indicated in the table below are estimates and may vary. Except where the context suggests otherwise, whenever this prospectus supplement contains a reference to fees or expenses paid by “you,” “us” or “Fifth Street,” or that “we” will pay fees or expenses, stockholders will indirectly bear such fees or expenses as investors in us.
 
         
Stockholder Transaction Expenses:
       
Sales load (as a percentage of offering price)
    3.00 %(1)
Offering expenses (as a percentage of offering price)
    1.01 %(2)
Dividend reinvestment plan fees
    %(3)
Total stockholder transaction expenses (as a percentage of offering price)
    4.01 %
Annual Expenses (as a percentage of net assets attributable to common stock):
       
Management fees
    4.64 %(4)
Interest payments on borrowed funds
    2.75 %(5)
Other expenses
    0.82 %(6)
         
Total annual expenses
    8.21 %(7)
 
 
(1) Represents the underwriting discount with respect to the shares of our common stock sold by us in this offering.
 
(2) The expenses of this offering payable by us are estimated to be approximately $600,000. If the underwriters exercise their over-allotment option in full, the offering expenses borne by our common stockholders (as a percentage of the offering price) will be approximately 0.88%.
 
(3) The expenses of administering our dividend reinvestment plan are included in operating expenses.
 
(4) Our “management fees” are made up of our base management fee and the incentive fees payable under our investment advisory agreement. The base management fee portion of our “management fees” reflected in the table above is 2.49%, which is calculated based on our net assets (rather than our gross assets). Our base management fee under the investment advisory agreement is based on our gross assets, which includes borrowings for investment purposes. Our investment adviser permanently waived the portion of the base management fee attributable to cash and cash equivalents as of the end of each quarter beginning March 31, 2010. As a result, our base management fee payable from and after such fiscal quarter will be calculated at an annual rate of 2% of our gross assets, including any investments made with borrowings, but excluding any cash and cash equivalents as of the end of each quarter.
 
The incentive fee portion of our “management fees” is 2.15%. This calculation assumes that annual incentive fees earned by our investment adviser remain consistent with the incentive fees earned by our investment adviser during the quarter ended March 31, 2011. The incentive fee consists of two parts. The first part, which is payable quarterly in arrears, will equal 20% of the excess, if any, of our “Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income” that exceeds a 2% quarterly (8% annualized) hurdle rate, subject to a “catch up” provision measured at the end of each fiscal quarter. The first part of the incentive fee will be computed and paid on income that may include interest that is accrued but not yet received in cash. The operation of the first part of the incentive fee for each quarter is as follows:
 
  •  no incentive fee is payable to the investment adviser in any fiscal quarter in which our Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income does not exceed the hurdle rate of 2% (the “preferred return” or “hurdle”).
 
  •  100% of our Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income with respect to that portion of such Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income, if any, that exceeds the hurdle rate but is less than or equal to 2.5% in any fiscal quarter (10% annualized) is payable to the investment adviser. We refer to this portion of our Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income (which exceeds the hurdle rate but is less than or equal to 2.5%) as the “catch-up.” The “catch-up” provision is intended to provide our investment adviser with an incentive fee of 20% on all of our Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income as if a hurdle rate did not apply when our Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income exceeds 2.5% in any fiscal quarter; and


S-5


Table of Contents

 
  •  20% of the amount of our Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income, if any, that exceeds 2.5% in any fiscal quarter (10% annualized) is payable to the investment adviser (once the hurdle is reached and the catch-up is achieved, 20% of all Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income thereafter is allocated to the investment adviser).
 
The second part of the incentive fee equals 20% of our “Incentive Fee Capital Gains,” which equals our realized capital gains on a cumulative basis from inception through the end of the year, if any, computed net of all realized capital losses and unrealized capital depreciation on a cumulative basis, less the aggregate amount of any previously paid capital gain incentive fees. The second part of the incentive fee is payable, in arrears, at the end of each fiscal year (or upon termination of the investment advisory agreement, as of the termination date).
 
(5) “Interest payments on borrowed funds” represent our estimated annual interest payments on borrowed funds and relate to borrowings under the Wells Fargo facility, the ING facility, our SBA-guaranteed debentures and our convertible senior notes.
 
(6) “Other Expenses” are based on estimated amounts for the current fiscal year.
 
(7) “Total annual expenses” are presented as a percentage of net assets attributable to common stockholders because our common stockholders bear all of our fees and expenses.
 
Example
 
The following example demonstrates the projected dollar amount of total cumulative expenses that would be incurred over various periods with respect to a hypothetical investment in our common stock. In calculating the following expense amounts, we have assumed we would have no additional leverage and that our annual operating expenses would remain at the levels set forth in the table above, and that you would pay a sales load of 3.0% (the underwriting discount to be paid by us with respect to common stock sold by us in this offering).
 
                                 
    1 Year     3 Years     5 Years     10 Years  
 
You would pay the following expenses on a $1,000 investment, assuming a 5% annual return
  $ 122     $ 282     $ 438     $ 812  
 
The example and the expenses in the tables above should not be considered a representation of our future expenses, and actual expenses may be greater or less than those shown. While the example assumes, as required by the SEC, a 5% annual return, our performance will vary and may result in a return greater or less than 5%. The income portion of our incentive fee under the investment advisory agreement, which, assuming a 5% annual return, would either not be payable or have an insignificant impact on the expense amounts shown above, is not included in the example. If we achieve sufficient returns on our investments, including through the realization of capital gains, to trigger an incentive fee of a material amount, our expenses, and returns to our investors, would be higher. In addition, while the example assumes reinvestment of all distributions at net asset value, participants in our dividend reinvestment plan will receive a number of shares of our common stock, determined by dividing the total dollar amount of the cash distribution payable to a participant by either (i) the greater of (a) the current net asset value per share of our common stock and (b) 95% of the market price per share of our common stock at the close of trading on the payment date fixed by our Board of Directors in the event that we use newly issued shares to satisfy the share requirements of the divided reinvestment plan or (ii) the average purchase price, excluding any brokerage charges or other charges, of all shares of common stock purchased by the administrator of the dividend reinvestment plan in the event that shares are purchased in the open market to satisfy the share requirements of the dividend reinvestment plan, which may be at, above or below net asset value.


S-6


Table of Contents

 
SUPPLEMENTARY RISK FACTORS
 
Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. In addition to the other information contained in this prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus, you should carefully consider the following supplementary risk factors together with the risk factors beginning on page 12 of the accompanying prospectus before making an investment in our common stock. The risks set out below and in the accompanying prospectus are not the only risks we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us might also impair our operations and performance. If any of the events described herein or in the accompanying prospectus occur, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. In such case, our net asset value and the trading price of our common stock could decline, and you may lose part or all of your investment.
 
Risks Related to our Convertible Senior Notes
 
Our stockholders may experience dilution upon the conversion of our convertible senior notes.
 
Our convertible senior notes are convertible into shares of our common stock beginning January 1, 2016 or, under certain circumstances, earlier. Upon conversion, we must deliver shares of our common stock. The conversion rate of our convertible senior notes was initially, and currently is, 67.7415 shares of our common stock per $1,000 principal amount of our convertible senior notes (equivalent to a conversion price of approximately $14.76 per share of common stock), subject to adjustment in certain circumstances. If we deliver shares of common stock upon a conversion at the time our net asset value per share exceeds the conversion price in effect at such time, our stockholders may incur dilution. In addition, our stockholders will experience dilution in their ownership percentage of our common stock upon our issuance of common stock in connection with the conversion of our convertible senior notes and any dividends paid on our common stock will also be paid on shares issued in connection with such conversion after such issuance.
 
We may not have, or have the ability to raise, the funds necessary to repurchase our convertible senior notes upon a fundamental change, and our debt may contain limitations on our ability to deliver shares of our common stock upon conversion or pay cash upon repurchase of our convertible senior notes.
 
Holders of our convertible senior notes will have the right to require us to repurchase their notes upon the occurrence of certain significant corporate events involving us, including if our common stock ceases to trade on any national securities exchange or we consolidate or merge into another entity in certain circumstances, at a repurchase price equal to 100% of their principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any. We refer to such a corporate event as a “fundamental change.” However, we may not have enough available cash or be able to obtain financing at the time we are required to make repurchases of convertible senior notes surrendered therefor. In addition, our ability to repurchase our convertible senior notes or deliver shares of our common stock upon conversions of the convertible senior notes may be limited by law, by regulatory authority or by agreements governing our indebtedness, including our credit facilities. In this regard, the ING facility currently prohibits us from repurchasing our convertible senior notes upon the occurrence of a fundamental change. Our failure to repurchase the notes at a time when the repurchase is required by the indenture relating to the convertible senior notes or to deliver any shares of our common stock deliverable on future conversions of the convertible senior notes as required by the indenture would constitute a default under the indenture. A default under the indenture or the occurrence of a fundamental change itself could also lead to a default under agreements governing our indebtedness. If the repayment of the related indebtedness were to be accelerated after any applicable notice or grace periods, we may not have sufficient funds to repay the indebtedness and repurchase our convertible senior notes.
 
Provisions of our convertible senior notes could discourage an acquisition of us by a third party.
 
Certain provisions of our convertible senior notes could make it more difficult or more expensive for a third party to acquire us. Upon the occurrence of a fundamental change, the holders of our convertible senior notes will have the right, at their option, to require us to repurchase all or a portion of their convertible senior notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest. We may also be required to increase the conversion rate of the


S-7


Table of Contents

convertible senior notes in certain other circumstances, including in the event of certain fundamental changes. These provisions could discourage an acquisition of us by a third party.
 
Certain adverse consequences could result if our convertible senior notes are treated as equity interests in us for purposes of regulations under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974.
 
Pursuant to regulations under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), it is possible that, due to their convertibility feature, our convertible senior notes could be treated as equity interests in us. In that event, if employee benefit plans subject to Title I of ERISA, plans that are not subject to ERISA but that are subject to Section 4975 of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”), such as individual retirement accounts, and entities that are deemed to hold the assets of such plans or accounts (such plans, accounts, and entities, “Benefit Plan Investors”) were to acquire 25% or more of the aggregate value of our convertible senior notes, among other consequences, we and our management would be subject to ERISA fiduciary duties, and certain transactions we might enter into, or may have entered into, in the ordinary course of our business might constitute non-exempt “prohibited transactions” under Section 406 of ERISA or Section 4975 of the Code and might have to be rescinded at significant cost to us. Moreover, if our underlying assets were deemed to be assets constituting plan assets, (i) our assets could be subject to ERISA’s reporting and disclosure requirements, (ii) a fiduciary causing a Benefit Plan Investor to make an investment in our equity interests could be deemed to have delegated its responsibility to manage the assets of the Benefit Plan Investor, and (iii) various providers of fiduciary or other services to us, and any other parties with authority or control with respect to our assets, could be deemed to be plan fiduciaries or otherwise parties in interest or disqualified persons by virtue of their provision of such services.
 
We do not believe that our convertible senior notes should be treated as equity interests in us for purposes of ERISA in light of the relevant regulations. No assurance can be given, however, that our convertible senior notes will not be so treated.
 
The accounting for convertible debt securities is complex and subject to uncertainty.
 
The accounting for convertible debt securities is complex and subject to frequent scrutiny by the accounting regulatory bodies and is subject to change. The issuance of our convertible senior notes may have an accounting effect on our earnings per share on a fully diluted basis. Further, we cannot predict if or when changes in the accounting for convertible debt securities could be made and whether any such change could have an adverse impact on our reported or future financial results. Any such impacts could adversely affect the market price of our common stock.


S-8


Table of Contents

 
USE OF PROCEEDS
 
The net proceeds from our sale of the 5,000,000 shares of common stock in this offering are estimated to be approximately $56.8 million, or $65.4 million if the underwriters’ over-allotment option is exercised in full, assuming a public offering price of $11.83 per share (based on the last reported sales price of our common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on June 17, 2011), and after deducting the underwriting discount and estimated offering expenses payable by us. A $0.50 increase (decrease) in the assumed offering price per share would increase (decrease) net proceeds to us from this offering by $2.4 million, assuming the number of shares offered by us as set forth on the cover page of this prospectus supplement remains the same. Any additional proceeds to us resulting from an increase in the public offering price or the number of shares offered pursuant to this prospectus supplement will be used by us as described below.
 
We intend to use substantially all of the net proceeds from this offering to make investments in small and mid-sized companies (including investments made through our first SBIC subsidiary and our second SBIC subsidiary to the extent that it receives a SBIC license from the SBA) in accordance with our investment objective and strategies described in this prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus and for general corporate purposes, including working capital requirements. We may also use the net proceeds from this offering to repay our outstanding borrowings under the ING facility. As of June 20, 2011, we had $28.0 million outstanding under the ING facility. The ING facility bears interest at a rate of LIBOR plus 3.5% per annum and has a maturity of February 22, 2014. Pending these uses, we will invest the net proceeds primarily in high quality, short-term debt securities, consistent with our business development company election and our election to be taxed as a RIC, at yields significantly below those we expect to earn on investments in small and mid-sized companies. The management fee payable by us to our investment adviser will not be reduced while our assets are invested in these securities unless such securities constitute cash and cash equivalents (as defined in the notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements). Our ability to achieve our investment objective may be limited to the extent that the net proceeds from this offering, pending full investment, are held in lower-yielding interest-bearing deposits or other short-term instruments.


S-9


Table of Contents

 
CAPITALIZATION
 
The following table sets forth our capitalization as of March 31, 2011:
 
  •  on an actual basis; and
 
  •  on an as adjusted basis to reflect the sale of 5,000,000 shares of common stock in this offering, assuming a public offering price of $11.83 per share (based on the last reported sales price of our common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on June 17, 2011), after deducting the underwriting discount and estimated offering expenses payable by us.
 
                 
    As of March 31, 2011  
          As
 
    Actual     adjusted(1)  
    (unaudited)  
 
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 38,556,212     $ 95,331,712  
                 
Long-term debt, including current maturities:
               
Loans payable
  $ 134,000,000     $ 134,000,000 (2)(3)
SBA debentures payable
    138,300,000       138,300,000 (4)
                 
Total long-term debt(5)
    272,300,000       272,300,000  
Net assets:
               
Common stock, $0.01 par value (150,000,000 shares authorized; 66,667,933 shares outstanding actual, 71,667,933 shares outstanding as adjusted)
    666,679       716,679  
Additional paid-in-capital
    765,404,953       822,130,453  
Net unrealized depreciation on investments
    (12,978,443 )     (12,978,443 )
Net realized loss on investments
    (47,054,064 )     (47,054,064 )
Accumulated undistributed net investment income
    5,708,972       5,708,972  
                 
Total net assets
    711,748,097       768,523,597  
Total capitalization
  $ 984,048,097     $ 1,040,823,597  
                 
 
 
(1) We may change the size of this offering based on demand and market conditions. A $0.50 increase (decrease) in the assumed offering price per share would increase (decrease) net proceeds to us from this offering by $2.4 million, assuming the number of shares offered by us as set forth on the cover page of this prospectus supplement remains the same, after deducting the underwriting discount and estimated expenses payable by us. Any additional proceeds to us resulting from an increase in the public offering price or the number of shares offered pursuant to this prospectus supplement will increase our cash and cash equivalents on an as adjusted basis and will be used as described in “Use of Proceeds.”
 
(2) As described under “Use of Proceeds,” we may also use a part of the net proceeds from this offering to repay a portion of the borrowings outstanding under the ING facility. We have not yet determined how much of the net proceeds of this offering will be used for this purpose and, as a result, we have not reflected the consequences of such repayment in this table.
 
(3) As of June 20, 2011, we had loans payable in the amount of $28.0 million due to net paydowns under our credit facilities in the amount of $106.0 million subsequent to March 31, 2011. This table has not been adjusted to reflect such net paydowns.
 
(4) As of June 20, 2011, we had SBA debentures payable in the amount of $147.3 million. This table has not been adjusted to reflect the additional issuance of $9.0 million of SBA-guaranteed debentures subsequent to March 31, 2011.
 
(5) This amount does not reflect the $152.0 million aggregate principal amount of our senior convertible notes issued on April 12, 2011, all of which are outstanding as of June 17, 2011.


S-10


Table of Contents

SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
 
The following selected financial data should be read together with our Consolidated Financial Statements and the related notes and the discussion under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” which are included elsewhere in this prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus. Effective as of January 2, 2008, Fifth Street Mezzanine Partners III, L.P. merged with and into Fifth Street Finance Corp. The financial information as of and for the period from inception (February 15, 2007) to September 30, 2007, and for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2008, 2009, and 2010 set forth below was derived from our audited Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes for Fifth Street Mezzanine Partners III, L.P. and Fifth Street Finance Corp., respectively. The financial information at and for the six months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 was derived from our unaudited financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus supplement. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting solely of normal recurring accruals, considered necessary for the fair presentation of financial statements for the interim periods, have been included. The historical financial information below may not be indicative of our future performance. Our results for the interim period may not be indicative of our results for the full year.
 
                                                 
    At and for the
                      At September 30, 2007
 
    Six Months
                      and for the Period
 
    Ended
    At and for the Year Ended
    February 15, 2007
 
    March 31,     September 30,     through
 
    2011     2010     2010     2009     2008     September 30, 2007  
    (In thousands, except per share amounts)  
 
                                                 
Statement of Operations data:
                                               
Total investment income
  $ 55,036     $ 31,098     $ 70,538     $ 49,828     $ 33,219     $ 4,296  
Base management fee, net
    8,565       3,877       9,275       5,889       4,258       1,564  
Incentive fee
    7,653       4,889       10,756       7,841       4,118        
All other expenses
    8,207       2,777       7,483       4,736       4,699       1,773  
Net investment income
    30,612       19,555       43,024       31,362       20,144       959  
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on interest rate swap
    970             (773 )                  
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments
    15,500       2,176       (1,055 )     (10,795 )     (16,948 )     123  
Net realized gain (loss) on investments
    (13,963 )     (2,802 )     (18,780 )     (14,373 )     62        
Net increase in partners’ capital/net assets resulting from operations
    33,119       18,929       22,416       6,194       3,258       1,082  
Per share data:
                                               
Net asset value per common share at period end
  $ 10.68     $ 10.70     $ 10.43     $ 10.84     $ 13.02       N/A  
Market price at period end
    13.35       11.61       11.14       10.93       10.05       N/A  
Net investment income
    0.52       0.48       0.95       1.27       1.29       N/A  
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments and interest rate swap
    0.28       0.06       (0.46 )     (1.02 )     (1.08 )     N/A  
Net increase in partners’ capital/net assets resulting from operations
    0.57       0.47       0.49       0.25       0.21       N/A  
Dividends paid
    0.62       0.57       0.99       1.20       0.61       N/A  
Balance Sheet data at period end:
                                               
Total investments at fair value
  $ 939,749     $ 460,865     $ 563,821     $ 299,611     $ 273,759     $ 88,391  
Cash and cash equivalents
    38,556       23,469       76,765       113,205       22,906       17,654  
Other assets
    17,443       6,510       11,340       3,071       2,484       1,285  
Total assets
    995,748       490,844       651,926       415,887       299,149       107,330  
Total liabilities
    284,000       6,447       82,754       5,331       4,813       514  
Total net assets
    711,748       484,397       569,172       410,556       294,336       106,816  
Other data:
                                               
Weighted average annual yield on debt investments(1)
    12.8 %     15.0 %     14.0 %     15.7 %     16.2 %     16.8 %
Number of portfolio companies at period end
    55       34       38       28       24       10  
 
 
(1) Weighted average annual yield is calculated based upon our debt investments at the end of the period.


S-11


Table of Contents

 
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
 
The following discussion should be read in connection with our Consolidated Financial Statements and the notes thereto included in this prospectus supplement.
 
The information in this section contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Please see “Supplementary Risk Factors” in this prospectus supplement and “Risk Factors” and “Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” in the accompanying prospectus for a discussion of the uncertainties, risks and assumptions associated with these statements.
 
Overview
 
We are a specialty finance company that lends to and invests in small and mid-sized companies, primarily in connection with investments by private equity sponsors. Our investment objective is to maximize our portfolio’s total return by generating current income from our debt investments and capital appreciation from our equity investments.
 
We were formed as a Delaware limited partnership (Fifth Street Mezzanine Partners III, L.P.) on February 15, 2007. Effective as of January 2, 2008, Fifth Street Mezzanine Partners III, L.P. merged with and into Fifth Street Finance Corp. At the time of the merger, all outstanding partnership interests in Fifth Street Mezzanine Partners III, L.P. were exchanged for 12,480,972 shares of common stock in Fifth Street Finance Corp.
 
Our Consolidated Financial Statements prior to January 2, 2008 reflect our operations as a Delaware limited partnership (Fifth Street Mezzanine Partners III, L.P.) prior to our merger with and into a corporation (Fifth Street Finance Corp.).
 
On June 17, 2008, we completed an initial public offering of 10,000,000 shares of our common stock at the offering price of $14.12 per share. Our shares are listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “FSC.”
 
On July 21, 2009, we completed a follow-on public offering of 9,487,500 shares of our common stock, which included the underwriters’ exercise of their over-allotment option, at the offering price of $9.25 per share.
 
On September 25, 2009, we completed a follow-on public offering of 5,520,000 shares of our common stock, which included the underwriters’ exercise of their over-allotment option, at the offering price of $10.50 per share.
 
On January 27, 2010, we completed a follow-on public offering of 7,000,000 shares of our common stock, which did not include the underwriters’ exercise of their over-allotment option, at the offering price of $11.20 per share. On February 25, 2010, we sold 300,500 shares of our common stock at the offering price of $11.20 per share upon the underwriters’ exercise of their over-allotment option in connection with this offering.
 
On June 21, 2010, we completed a follow-on public offering of 9,200,000 shares of our common stock, which included the underwriters’ exercise of their over-allotment option, at the offering price of $11.50 per share.
 
On December 7, 2010, we entered into an at-the-market equity offering sales agreement relating to shares of our common stock. Throughout the month of December 2010, we sold 429,110 shares of our common stock at an average offering price of $11.87 per share. We terminated the at-the-market equity offering sales agreement effective January 20, 2011 and did not sell any shares of our common stock pursuant thereto subsequent to December 31, 2010.
 
On February 4, 2011, we completed a follow-on public offering of 11,500,000 shares of our common stock, which included the underwriters’ exercise of their over-allotment option, at the offering price of $12.65 per share.


S-12


Table of Contents

Current Market Conditions
 
Since mid-2007, the global financial markets have experienced stress, volatility, illiquidity, and disruption. This turmoil appears to have peaked in the fall of 2008, resulting in several major financial institutions becoming insolvent, being acquired, or receiving government assistance. While the turmoil in the financial markets appears to have abated somewhat, the global economy continues to experience economic uncertainty. Economic uncertainty impacts our business in many ways, including changing spreads, structures, and purchase multiples as well as the overall supply of investment capital.
 
Despite the economic uncertainty, our deal pipeline remains robust, with high quality transactions backed by private equity sponsors in small to mid-sized companies. As always, we remain cautious in selecting new investment opportunities, and will only deploy capital in deals which are consistent with our disciplined philosophy of pursuing superior risk-adjusted returns.
 
As evidenced by our recent investment activities, we expect to grow the business in part by increasing the average investment size when and where appropriate. At the same time, we expect to focus more on first lien transactions. Although we believe that we currently have sufficient capital available to fund investments, a prolonged period of market disruptions may cause us to reduce the volume of loans we originate and/or fund, which could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations. In this regard, because our common stock has at times traded at a price below our then current net asset value per share and we are limited in our ability to sell our common stock at a price below net asset value per share, we may be limited in our ability to raise equity capital.
 
Critical Accounting Policies
 
FASB Accounting Standards Codification
 
The issuance of FASB Accounting Standards Codificationtm (the “Codification”) on July 1, 2009 (effective for interim or annual reporting periods ending after September 15, 2009), changed the way that U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) are referenced. Beginning on that date, the Codification officially became the single source of authoritative nongovernmental GAAP; however, SEC registrants must also consider rules, regulations, and interpretive guidance issued by the SEC or its staff. The switch affects the way companies refer to GAAP in financial statements and in their accounting policies. References to standards will consist solely of the number used in the Codification’s structural organization.
 
Consistent with the effective date of the Codification, financial statements for periods ending after September 15, 2009 refer to the Codification structure, not pre-Codification historical GAAP.
 
Basis of Presentation
 
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions affecting amounts reported in the Consolidated Financial Statements. We have identified investment valuation and revenue recognition as our most critical accounting estimates. We continuously evaluate our estimates, including those related to the matters described below. These estimates are based on the information that is currently available to us and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates under different assumptions or conditions. A discussion of our critical accounting policies follows.
 
Investment Valuation
 
We are required to report our investments that are not publicly traded or for which current market values are not readily available at fair value. The fair value is deemed to be the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.
 
Under Accounting Standards Codification 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (“ASC 820”), which we adopted effective October 1, 2008, we perform detailed valuations of our debt and equity


S-13


Table of Contents

investments on an individual basis, using market, income, and bond yield approaches as appropriate. In general, we utilize the bond yield method in determining the fair value of our investments, as long as it is appropriate. If, in our judgment, the bond yield approach is not appropriate, we may use the enterprise value approach in determining the fair value of our investment in the portfolio company. If there is deterioration in the credit quality of the portfolio company or an investment is in workout status, we may use alternative methodologies including an asset liquidation or expected recovery model.
 
Under the market approach, we estimate the enterprise value of the portfolio companies in which we invest. There is no one methodology to estimate enterprise value and, in fact, for any one portfolio company, enterprise value is best expressed as a range of fair values, from which we derive a single estimate of enterprise value. To estimate the enterprise value of a portfolio company, we analyze various factors, including the portfolio company’s historical and projected financial results. Typically, private companies are valued based on multiples of EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization), cash flows, net income, revenues, or in limited cases, book value. We generally require portfolio companies to provide annual audited and quarterly and monthly unaudited financial statements, as well as annual projections for the upcoming fiscal year.
 
Under the income approach, we generally prepare and analyze discounted cash flow models based on our projections of the future free cash flows of the business. Under the bond yield approach, we use bond yield models to determine the present value of the future cash flow streams of our debt investments. We review various sources of transactional data, including private mergers and acquisitions involving debt investments with similar characteristics, and assess the information in the valuation process.
 
Our Board of Directors undertakes a multi-step valuation process each quarter in connection with determining the fair value of our investments:
 
  •  Our quarterly valuation process begins with each portfolio company or investment being initially valued by the deal team within our investment adviser responsible for the portfolio investment;
 
  •  Preliminary valuations are then reviewed and discussed with the principals of our investment adviser;
 
  •  Separately, independent valuation firms engaged by our Board of Directors prepare preliminary valuations on a selected basis and submit reports to us;
 
  •  The deal team compares and contrasts its preliminary valuations to the preliminary valuations of the independent valuation firms;
 
  •  The deal team prepares a valuation report for the Valuation Committee of our Board of Directors;
 
  •  The Valuation Committee of our Board of Directors is apprised of the preliminary valuations of the independent valuation firms;
 
  •  The Valuation Committee of our Board of Directors reviews the preliminary valuations, and the deal team responds and supplements the preliminary valuations to reflect any comments provided by the Valuation Committee;
 
  •  The Valuation Committee of our Board of Directors makes a recommendation to the Board of Directors; and
 
  •  Our Board of Directors discusses valuations and determines the fair value of each investment in our portfolio in good faith.
 
The fair value of all of our investments at March 31, 2011, and September 30, 2010, was determined by our Board of Directors. Our Board of Directors is solely responsible for the valuation of our portfolio investments at fair value as determined in good faith pursuant to our valuation policy and our consistently applied valuation process.
 
Our Board of Directors has engaged independent valuation firms to provide us with valuation assistance. Upon completion of their processes each quarter, the independent valuation firms provide us with written reports regarding the preliminary valuations of selected portfolio securities as of the close of such quarter. We


S-14


Table of Contents

will continue to engage independent valuation firms to provide us with assistance regarding our determination of the fair value of selected portfolio securities each quarter; however, our Board of Directors is ultimately and solely responsible for determining the fair value of our investments in good faith.
 
The portions of our portfolio valued, as a percentage of the portfolio at fair value, by independent valuation firms by period were as follows:
 
         
For the quarter ending December 31, 2007
    91.9 %
For the quarter ending March 31, 2008
    92.1 %
For the quarter ending June 30, 2008
    91.7 %
For the quarter ending September 30, 2008
    92.8 %
For the quarter ending December 31, 2008
    100.0 %
For the quarter ending March 31, 2009
    88.7 %(1)
For the quarter ending June 30, 2009
    92.1 %
For the quarter ending September 30, 2009
    28.1 %
For the quarter ending December 31, 2009
    17.2 %(2)
For the quarter ending March 31, 2010
    26.9 %
For the quarter ending June 30, 2010
    53.1 %
For the quarter ending September 30, 2010
    61.8 %
For the quarter ending December 31, 2010
    73.9 %
For the quarter ending March 31, 2011
    82.0 %
 
 
 
(1) 96.0% excluding our investment in IZI Medical Products, Inc., which closed on December 31, 2009, and therefore was not part of the independent valuation process
 
 
(2) 24.8% excluding four investments that closed in December 2009 and therefore were not part of the independent valuation process
 
Our $50 million credit facility with Bank of Montreal was terminated effective September 16, 2009. The facility required independent valuations for at least 90% of the portfolio on a quarterly basis. With the termination of this facility, this valuation test is no longer required. However, we still intend to have a portion of the portfolio valued by an independent third party on a quarterly basis, with a substantial portion being valued on an annual basis.
 
As of March 31, 2011 and September 30, 2010, approximately 94.4% and 86.5%, respectively, of our total assets represented investments in portfolio companies valued at fair value.
 
Revenue Recognition
 
Interest and Dividend Income
 
Interest income, adjusted for amortization of premium and accretion of original issue discount, is recorded on the accrual basis to the extent that such amounts are expected to be collected. We stop accruing interest on investments when it is determined that interest is no longer collectible. Distributions from portfolio companies are recorded as dividend income when the distribution is received.
 
Fee Income
 
We receive a variety of fees in the ordinary course of business. Certain fees, such as origination fees, are capitalized and amortized in accordance with ASC 310-20 Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs. In accordance with ASC 820, the net unearned fee income balance is netted against the cost and fair value of the respective investments. Other fees, such as servicing fees, are classified as fee income and recognized as they are earned on a monthly basis.
 
We have also structured exit fees across certain of our portfolio investments to be received upon the future exit of those investments. These fees are to be paid to us upon the sooner to occur of (i) a sale of the


S-15


Table of Contents

borrower or substantially all of the assets of the borrower, (ii) the maturity date of the loan, or (iii) the date when full prepayment of the loan occurs. Exit fees are payable upon the exit of a debt security and a portion of these fees are included in net investment income over the life of the loan. The receipt of such fees is contingent upon a successful exit event for each of the investments.
 
Payment-in-Kind (PIK) Interest
 
Our loans typically contain a contractual PIK interest provision. The PIK interest, which represents contractually deferred interest added to the loan balance that is generally due at the end of the loan term, is generally recorded on the accrual basis to the extent such amounts are expected to be collected. We generally cease accruing PIK interest if there is insufficient value to support the accrual or if we do not expect the portfolio company to be able to pay all principal and interest due. Our decision to cease accruing PIK interest involves subjective judgments and determinations based on available information about a particular portfolio company, including whether the portfolio company is current with respect to its payment of principal and interest on its loans and debt securities; monthly and quarterly financial statements and financial projections for the portfolio company; our assessment of the portfolio company’s business development success, including product development, profitability and the portfolio company’s overall adherence to its business plan; information obtained by us in connection with periodic formal update interviews with the portfolio company’s management and, if appropriate, the private equity sponsor; and information about the general economic and market conditions in which the portfolio company operates. Based on this and other information, we determine whether to cease accruing PIK interest on a loan or debt security. Our determination to cease accruing PIK interest on a loan or debt security is generally made well before our full write-down of such loan or debt security. In addition, if it is subsequently determined that we will not be able to collect any previously accrued PIK interest, the fair value of our loans or debt securities would decline by the amount of such previously accrued, but uncollectible, PIK interest.
 
For a discussion of risks we are subject to as a result of our use of PIK interest in connection with our investments, see “Risk Factors — Risks Relating to Our Business and Structure — We may have difficulty paying our required distributions if we recognize income before or without receiving cash representing such income,” “— We may in the future choose to pay dividends in our own stock, in which case you may be required to pay tax in excess of the cash you receive” and “— Our incentive fee may induce our investment adviser to make speculative investments” in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2010. In addition, if it is subsequently determined that we will not be able to collect any previously accrued PIK interest, the fair value of our loans or debt securities would decline by the amount of such previously accrued, but uncollectible, PIK interest. The accrual of PIK interest on our debt investments increases the recorded cost basis of these investments in our Consolidated Financial Statements and, as a result, increases the cost basis of these investments for purposes of computing the capital gains incentive fee payable by us to our investment adviser.
 
To maintain our status as a RIC, PIK income must be paid out to our stockholders in the form of dividends even though we have not yet collected the cash and may never collect the cash relating to the PIK interest. Accumulated PIK interest was $18.9 million and represented 2.0% of the fair value of our portfolio of investments as of March 31, 2011 and $19.3 million or 3.4% as of September 30, 2010. The net increase in loan balances as a result of contracted PIK arrangements are separately identified in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
 
Portfolio Composition
 
Our investments principally consist of loans, purchased equity investments and equity grants in privately-held companies. Our loans are typically secured by either a first or second lien on the assets of the portfolio company and generally have terms of up to six years (but an expected average life of between three and four years). We are currently focusing our new debt origination efforts on first lien loans because we believe that the risk-adjusted returns from these loans are superior to second lien and unsecured loans at this time and offer superior credit quality. However, we may choose to originate second lien and unsecured loans in the future.


S-16


Table of Contents

A summary of the composition of our investment portfolio at cost and fair value as a percentage of total investments is shown in the following tables:
 
                 
    March 31,
    September 30,
 
    2011     2010  
 
Cost:
               
First lien debt
    85.92 %     72.61 %
Second lien debt
    9.97 %     25.42 %
Subordinated debt
    2.69 %     0.80 %
Purchased equity
    0.65 %     0.39 %
Equity grants
    0.70 %     0.75 %
Limited partnership interests
    0.07 %     0.03 %
                 
Total
    100.00 %     100.00 %
                 
 
                 
    March 31,
    September 30,
 
    2011     2010  
 
Fair value:
               
First lien debt
    87.46 %     73.84 %
Second lien debt
    8.79 %     24.45 %
Subordinated debt
    2.59 %     0.78 %
Purchased equity
    0.42 %     0.11 %
Equity grants
    0.68 %     0.79 %
Limited partnership interests
    0.06 %     0.03 %
                 
Total
    100.00 %     100.00 %
                 


S-17


Table of Contents

The industry composition of our portfolio at cost and fair value as a percentage of total investments were as follows:
 
                 
    March 31, 2011     September 30, 2010  
 
Cost:
               
Healthcare services
    18.47 %     14.76 %
Healthcare equipment
    7.56 %     8.02 %
IT consulting & other services
    5.23 %     0.00 %
Diversified support services
    5.19 %     4.43 %
Oil & gas equipment & services
    4.75 %     0.00 %
Education services
    4.49 %     7.58 %
Internet software & services
    4.30 %     0.00 %
Construction and engineering
    4.16 %     4.22 %
Specialty stores
    4.13 %     0.00 %
Household products
    3.49 %     0.18 %
Electronic equipment & instruments
    3.46 %     5.59 %
Apparel, accessories & luxury goods
    3.33 %     3.97 %
Home improvement retail
    2.96 %     5.51 %
Fertilizers & agricultural chemicals
    2.77 %     4.51 %
Food distributors
    2.77 %     5.13 %
Healthcare technology
    2.23 %     3.63 %
Human resources & employment services
    2.19 %     0.00 %
Electronic manufacturing services
    2.06 %     3.16 %
Food retail
    2.02 %     3.31 %
Advertising
    2.00 %     3.35 %
Air freight and logistics
    1.82 %     2.36 %
Trucking
    1.79 %     2.88 %
Distributors
    1.42 %     2.25 %
Data processing and outsourced services
    1.38 %     2.21 %
Other diversified financial services
    1.19 %     0.00 %
Industrial machinery
    1.08 %     1.71 %
Leisure facilities
    0.70 %     1.16 %
Building products
    0.69 %     1.40 %
Construction materials
    0.69 %     2.95 %
Environmental & facilities services
    0.60 %     1.51 %
Housewares & specialties
    0.56 %     2.06 %
Restaurants
    0.43 %     2.11 %
Multi-sector holdings
    0.07 %     0.02 %
Movies & entertainment
    0.02 %     0.03 %
                 
Total
    100.00 %     100.00 %
                 
 


S-18


Table of Contents

                 
    March 31, 2011     September 30, 2010  
 
Fair Value:
               
Healthcare services
    19.39 %     15.83 %
Healthcare equipment
    7.82 %     8.57 %
IT consulting & other services
    5.44 %     0.00 %
Diversified support services
    5.39 %     4.66 %
Oil & gas equipment & services
    4.92 %     0.00 %
Internet software & services
    4.45 %     0.00 %
Specialty stores
    4.31 %     0.00 %
Construction and engineering
    3.88 %     4.23 %
Apparel, accessories & luxury goods
    3.68 %     4.18 %
Household products
    3.62 %     0.19 %
Electronic equipment & instruments
    3.57 %     5.83 %
Education services
    3.19 %     7.47 %
Home improvement retail
    3.00 %     5.76 %
Fertilizers & agricultural chemicals
    2.89 %     4.76 %
Food distributors
    2.89 %     5.38 %
Healthcare technology
    2.34 %     3.93 %
Human resources & employment services
    2.28 %     0.00 %
Food retail
    2.10 %     3.50 %
Advertising
    2.06 %     3.52 %
Air freight and logistics
    1.90 %     2.49 %
Electronic manufacturing services
    1.59 %     3.20 %
Distributors
    1.46 %     2.35 %
Data processing and outsourced services
    1.38 %     2.26 %
Other diversified financial services
    1.25 %     0.00 %
Industrial machinery
    1.16 %     1.81 %
Leisure facilities
    0.73 %     1.25 %
Construction materials
    0.71 %     3.02 %
Building products
    0.71 %     1.21 %
Environmental & facilities services
    0.60 %     0.91 %
Housewares & specialties
    0.43 %     0.66 %
Trucking
    0.41 %     0.82 %
Restaurants
    0.36 %     2.15 %
Multi-sector holdings
    0.06 %     0.01 %
Movies & entertainment
    0.03 %     0.05 %
                 
Total
    100.00 %     100.00 %
                 
 
Portfolio Asset Quality
 
We employ a grading system to assess and monitor the credit risk of our investment portfolio. We rate all investments on a scale from 1 to 5. The system is intended to reflect the performance of the borrower’s business, the collateral coverage of the loan, and other factors considered relevant to making a credit judgment.
 
  •  Investment Rating 1 is used for investments that are performing above expectations and/or a capital gain is expected.

S-19


Table of Contents

 
  •  Investment Rating 2 is used for investments that are performing substantially within our expectations, and whose risks remain neutral or favorable compared to the potential risk at the time of the original investment. All new investments are initially rated 2.
 
  •  Investment Rating 3 is used for investments that are performing below our expectations and that require closer monitoring, but where we expect no loss of investment return (interest and/or dividends) or principal. Companies with a rating of 3 may be out of compliance with financial covenants.
 
  •  Investment Rating 4 is used for investments that are performing below our expectations and for which risk has increased materially since the original investment. We expect some loss of investment return, but no loss of principal.
 
  •  Investment Rating 5 is used for investments that are performing substantially below our expectations and whose risks have increased substantially since the original investment. Investments with a rating of 5 are those for which some loss of principal is expected.
 
The following table shows the distribution of our investments on the 1 to 5 investment rating scale at fair value, as of March 31, 2011 and September 30, 2010:
 
                                                 
    March 31, 2011     September 30, 2010  
          Percentage of
    Leverage
          Percentage of
    Leverage
 
    Fair Value     Total Portfolio     Ratio     Fair Value     Total Portfolio     Ratio  
 
1
  $ 102,517,984       10.91 %     3.07     $ 89,150,457       15.81 %     2.97  
2
    811,039,654       86.30 %     3.42       424,494,799       75.29 %     4.31  
3
    18,238,348       1.94 %     4.52       18,055,528       3.20 %     13.25  
4
          0.00 %           23,823,120       4.23 %     8.13  
5
    7,953,067       0.85 %     NM (1)     8,297,412       1.47 %     NM (1)
                                                 
Total
  $ 939,749,053       100.00 %     3.30     $ 563,821,316       100.00 %     4.53  
                                                 
 
 
(1) Due to operating performance this ratio is not measurable and, as a result, is excluded from the total portfolio calculation.
 
We may from time to time modify the payment terms of our investments, either in response to current economic conditions and their impact on certain of our portfolio companies or in accordance with tier pricing provisions in certain loan agreements. As of March 31, 2011, we had modified the payment terms of our investments in five portfolio companies. Such modified terms may include increased PIK interest provisions and reduced cash interest rates. These modifications, and any future modifications to our loan agreements, may limit the amount of interest income that we recognize from the modified investments, which may, in turn, limit our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.
 
Loans and Debt Securities on Non-Accrual Status
 
 
As of March 31, 2011, we had stopped accruing cash interest, PIK interest and original issue discount (“OID”) on three investments that did not pay all of their scheduled cash interest payments for the period ended March 31, 2011. As of March 31, 2010, we had stopped accruing PIK interest and OID on four investments, including two investments that had not paid all of their scheduled cash interest payments.


S-20


Table of Contents

The non-accrual status of our portfolio investments as of March 31, 2011, September 30, 2010 and March 31, 2010 was as follows:
 
             
    March 31, 2011   September 30, 2010   March 31, 2010
 
Lighting by Gregory, LLC
  Cash non-accrual   Cash non-accrual   Cash non-accrual
Martini Park, LLC
      PIK non-accrual
Nicos Polymers & Grinding, Inc. 
    Cash non-accrual   PIK non-accrual
MK Network, LLC
  Cash non-accrual   Cash non-accrual  
Premier Trailer Leasing, Inc. 
  Cash non-accrual   Cash non-accrual   Cash non-accrual
Vanguard Vinyl, Inc. 
    Cash non-accrual  
 
Non-accrual interest amounts related to the above investments for the three and six months ended March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010 were as follows:
 
                                 
    Three Months Ended
    Three Months Ended
    Six Months Ended
    Six Months Ended
 
    March 31, 2011     March 31, 2010     March 31, 2011     March 31, 2010  
 
                                 
Cash interest income
  $ 1,460,163     $ 1,311,024     $ 3,566,595     $ 2,445,588  
PIK interest income
    146,184       451,313       386,574       920,196  
OID income
    30,138       103,911       60,276       207,822  
                                 
Total
  $ 1,636,485     $ 1,866,248     $ 4,013,445     $ 3,573,606  
                                 
 
Discussion and Analysis of Results and Operations
 
Results of Operations
 
The principal measure of our financial performance is net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations, which includes net investment income (loss), net realized gain (loss) and net unrealized appreciation (depreciation). Net investment income is the difference between our income from interest, dividends, fees, and other investment income and total expenses. Net realized gain (loss) on investments is the difference between the proceeds received from dispositions of portfolio investments and their stated costs. Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) is the net change in the fair value of our investment portfolio and derivative instruments.
 
Comparison of the three and six months ended March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010
 
Total Investment Income
 
Total investment income includes interest and dividend income on our investments, fee income and other investment income. Fee income consists principally of loan and arrangement fees, administrative fees, unused fees, amendment fees, equity structuring fees, exit fees, prepayment fees, and waiver fees. Other investment income consists primarily of dividend income received from certain of our equity investments.
 
Total investment income for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010 was $29.7 million and $17.9 million, respectively. For the three months ended March 31, 2011, this amount primarily consisted of $25.8 million of interest income from portfolio investments (which included $3.5 million of PIK interest), and $3.9 million of fee income. For the three months ended March 31, 2010, total investment income primarily consisted of $16.4 million of interest income from portfolio investments (which included $2.3 million of PIK interest), and $1.4 million of fee income.
 
Total investment income for the six months ended March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010 was $55.0 million and $31.1 million, respectively. For the six months ended March 31, 2011, this amount primarily consisted of $46.6 million of interest income from portfolio investments (which included $6.6 million of PIK interest), and $8.4 million of fee income. For the six months ended March 31, 2010, this amount primarily consisted of $28.7 million of interest income from portfolio investments (which included $4.3 million of PIK interest), and $2.4 million of fee income.


S-21


Table of Contents

The increase in our total investment income for the three and six months ended March 31, 2011 as compared to the three and six months ended March 31, 2010 was primarily attributable to higher average levels of outstanding debt investments, which was principally due to an increase of 21 investments in our portfolio in the year-over-year period, partially offset by scheduled amortization repayments received and other debt payoffs during the same period.
 
Expenses
 
Expenses (net of the permanently waived portion of the base management fee) for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010 were $13.1 million and $6.7 million, respectively. Expenses increased for the three months ended March 31, 2011 as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2010 by $6.4 million, primarily as a result of increases in the base management fee, the incentive fee, interest expense and professional fees.
 
Expenses (net of the permanently waived portion of the base management fee) for the six months ended March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010 were $24.4 million and $11.5 million, respectively. Expenses increased for the six months ended March 31, 2011 as compared to the six months ended March 31, 2010 by $12.9 million, primarily as a result of increases in the base management fee, the incentive fee, interest expense, professional fees, and other general and administrative expenses.
 
Net Investment Income
 
As a result of the $11.8 million increase in total investment income as compared to the $6.4 million increase in net expenses, net investment income for the three months ended March 31, 2011 reflected a $5.3 million, or 47.7%, increase compared to the three months ended March 31, 2010.
 
As a result of the $23.9 million increase in total investment income as compared to the $12.9 million increase in net expenses, net investment income for the six months ended March 31, 2011 reflected an $11.0 million, or 56.5%, increase compared to the six months ended March 31, 2010.
 
Realized Gain (Loss) on Sale of Investments
 
Net realized gain (loss) on investments is the difference between the proceeds received from dispositions of portfolio investments and their stated costs. Realized losses may also be recorded in connection with our determination that certain investments are considered worthless securities and/or meet the conditions for loss recognition per the applicable tax rules.
 
During the six months ended March 31, 2011, we recorded investment realization events, including the following:
 
  •  In October 2010, we received a cash payment of $8.7 million from Goldco, Inc. in full satisfaction of all obligations under the loan agreement. The debt investment was exited at par and no realized gain or loss was recorded on this transaction;
 
  •  In November 2010, we received a cash payment of $11.0 million from TBA Global, LLC in full satisfaction of all obligations under the loan agreement. The debt investment was exited at par and no realized gain or loss was recorded on this transaction;
 
  •  In November 2010, we restructured our investment in Vanguard Vinyl, Inc. The restructuring resulted in a material modification of the terms of the loan agreement. As such, we recorded a realized loss in the amount of $1.7 million in accordance with ASC 470-50;
 
  •  In December 2010, we restructured our investment in Nicos Polymers & Grinding, Inc. The restructuring resulted in a material modification of the terms of the loan agreement. As such, we recorded a realized loss in the amount of $3.9 million in accordance with ASC 470-50;


S-22


Table of Contents

 
  •  In December 2010, we received a cash payment of $25.3 million from Boot Barn in full satisfaction of all obligations under the loan agreement. The debt investment was exited at par and no realized gain or loss was recorded on this transaction;
 
  •  In December 2010, we received a cash payment of $11.7 million from Western Emulsions, Inc. in partial satisfaction of the obligations under the loan agreement. No realized gain or loss was recorded on this transaction;
 
  •  In December 2010, we restructured our investment in Lighting by Gregory, LLC. The restructuring resulted in a material modification of the terms of the loan agreement. As such, we recorded a realized loss in the amount of $7.8 million in accordance with ASC 470-50; and
 
  •  In March 2011, we received a cash payment of $5.0 million from AmBath/ReBath Holdings, Inc. as part of a restructuring of the loan agreement. The restructuring resulted in a material modification of the terms of the loan agreement. As such, we recorded a realized loss in the amount of $0.3 million in accordance with ASC 470-50.
 
During the six months ended March 31, 2010, we recorded investment realization events, including the following:
 
  •  In October 2009, we received a cash payment in the amount of $0.1 million representing a payment in full of all amounts due in connection with the cancellation of our loan agreement with American Hardwoods Industries, LLC. We recorded a $0.1 million reduction to the previously recorded $10.4 million realized loss on the investment in American Hardwoods;
 
  •  In October 2009, we received a cash payment of $3.9 million from Elephant & Castle, Inc. in partial satisfaction of the obligations under the loan agreement. No realized gain or loss was recorded on this transaction; and
 
  •  In March 2010, we recorded a realized loss in the amount of $2.9 million in connection with the sale of a portion of our investment in CPAC, Inc.
 
Net Unrealized Appreciation or Depreciation on Investments and Interest Rate Swaps
 
Net unrealized appreciation or depreciation is the net change in the fair value of our investment portfolio and our interest rate swaps during the reporting period, including the reversal of previously recorded unrealized appreciation or depreciation when gains or losses are realized.
 
During the three months ended March 31, 2011, we recorded net unrealized depreciation of $0.4 million. This consisted of $1.4 million of net unrealized depreciation of equity investments, offset by $0.2 million of net unrealized appreciation on debt investments, $0.6 million of net reclassifications to realized losses and $0.2 million of net unrealized appreciation on interest rate swaps. During the three months ended March 31, 2010, we recorded net unrealized appreciation of $1.2 million. This consisted of $3.3 million of reclassifications to realized losses and $1.1 million of net unrealized appreciation on equity investments, partially offset by $3.2 million of net unrealized depreciation on debt investments.
 
During the six months ended March 31, 2011, we recorded net unrealized appreciation of $16.5 million. This consisted of $10.9 million of net reclassifications to realized losses, $5.7 million of net unrealized appreciation on debt investments and $1.0 million of net unrealized appreciation on interest rate swaps, offset by $1.1 million of net unrealized depreciation on equity investments. During the six months ended March 31, 2010, we recorded net unrealized appreciation of $2.2 million. This consisted of $3.3 million of reclassifications to realized losses and $0.9 million of net unrealized appreciation on equity investments, partially offset by $2.0 million of net unrealized depreciation on debt investments.


S-23


Table of Contents

Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources
 
Cash Flows
 
We have a number of alternatives available to fund the growth of our investment portfolio and our operations, including, but not limited to, raising equity, increasing debt, or funding from operational cash flow. Additionally, we may reduce investment size by syndicating a portion of any given transaction.
 
For the six months ended March 31, 2011, we experienced a net decrease in cash and cash equivalents of $38.2 million. During that period, we used $342.6 million of cash in operating activities, primarily for the funding of $452.7 million of investments, partially offset by $72.4 million of principal payments received and $30.6 million of net investment income. During the same period, cash provided by financing activities was $304.4 million, primarily consisting of $134.0 million of net borrowings under our credit facilities, $65.3 million of SBA borrowings, and $143.9 million of proceeds from the issuance of our common stock, partially offset by $34.0 million of cash dividends paid, and $4.3 million of deferred financing costs paid. We intend to fund our future distribution obligations through operating cash flow or with funds obtained through future equity and debt offerings or credit facilities, as we deem appropriate.
 
For the six months ended March 31, 2010, we experienced a net decrease in cash and cash equivalents of $89.7 million. During that period, we used $144.4 million of cash in operating activities, primarily for the funding of $176.7 million of investments, partially offset by $15.4 million of principal payments and proceeds received and $19.6 million of net investment income. During the same period cash provided by financing activities was $54.7 million, primarily consisting of $78.1 million of proceeds from the issuance of our common stock, partially offset by $22.6 million of cash dividends paid.
 
As of March 31, 2011, we had 38.6 million in cash and cash equivalents, portfolio investments (at fair value) of $939.7 million, $6.6 million of interest and fees receivable, $138.3 million of SBA debentures payable, $134.0 million of borrowings outstanding under our credit facilities, and unfunded commitments of $85.6 million.
 
As of September 30, 2010, we had $76.8 million in cash and cash equivalents, portfolio investments (at fair value) of $563.8 million, $3.8 million of interest and fees receivable, $73.0 million of SBA debentures payable, and unfunded commitments of $49.5 million.
 
Other Sources of Liquidity
 
We intend to continue to generate cash primarily from cash flows from operations, including interest earned from the temporary investment of cash, future borrowings and future offerings of securities. In the future, we may also securitize a portion of our investments in first and second lien senior loans or unsecured debt or other assets. To securitize loans, we would likely create a wholly-owned subsidiary and contribute a pool of loans to the subsidiary. We would then sell interests in the subsidiary on a non-recourse basis to purchasers and we would retain all or a portion of the equity in the subsidiary. Our primary use of funds is investments in our targeted asset classes and cash distributions to holders of our common stock.
 
Although we expect to fund the growth of our investment portfolio through the net proceeds from future equity offerings, including our dividend reinvestment plan, and issuances of senior securities or future borrowings, to the extent permitted by the 1940 Act, our plans to raise capital may not be successful. In this regard, because our common stock has at times traded at a price below our then-current net asset value per share and we are limited in our ability to sell our common stock at a price below net asset value per share, we may be limited in our ability to raise equity capital.
 
In addition, we intend to distribute between 90% and 100% of our taxable income to our stockholders in order to satisfy the requirements applicable to RICs under Subchapter M of the Code. See “Regulated Investment Company Status and Dividends” below. Consequently, we may not have the funds or the ability to fund new investments, to make additional investments in our portfolio companies, to fund our unfunded commitments to portfolio companies or to repay borrowings. In addition, the illiquidity of our portfolio


S-24


Table of Contents

investments may make it difficult for us to sell these investments when desired and, if we are required to sell these investments, we may realize significantly less than their recorded value.
 
Also, as a business development company, we generally are required to meet a coverage ratio of total assets, less liabilities and indebtedness not represented by senior securities, to total senior securities, which include all of our borrowings and any outstanding preferred stock, of at least 200%. This requirement limits the amount that we may borrow. As of March 31, 2011, we were in compliance with this requirement. To fund growth in our investment portfolio in the future, we anticipate needing to raise additional capital from various sources, including the equity markets and the securitization or other debt-related markets, which may or may not be available on favorable terms, if at all.
 
Finally, through a wholly-owned subsidiary, we sought and obtained a license from the SBA to operate an SBIC. In this regard, on February 3, 2010, our wholly-owned subsidiary, Fifth Street Mezzanine Partners IV, L.P., received a license, effective February 1, 2010, from the SBA to operate as an SBIC under Section 301(c) of the Small Business Investment Act of 1958. SBICs are designated to stimulate the flow of private equity capital to eligible small businesses. Under SBA regulations, SBICs may make loans to eligible small businesses and invest in the equity securities of small businesses.
 
The SBIC license allows our SBIC subsidiary to obtain leverage by issuing SBA-guaranteed debentures, subject to the issuance of a capital commitment by the SBA and other customary procedures. SBA-guaranteed debentures are non-recourse, interest-only debentures with interest payable semi-annually and have a ten year maturity. The principal amount of SBA-guaranteed debentures is not required to be paid prior to maturity but may be prepaid at any time without penalty. The interest rate of SBA-guaranteed debentures is fixed on a semi-annual basis at a market-driven spread over U.S. Treasury Notes with 10-year maturities.
 
SBA regulations currently limit the amount that our SBIC subsidiary may borrow to a maximum of $150 million when it has at least $75 million in regulatory capital, receives a capital commitment from the SBA and has been through an examination by the SBA subsequent to licensing. As of March 31, 2011, our SBIC subsidiary had $75 million in regulatory capital. The SBA has issued a capital commitment to our SBIC subsidiary in the amount of $150 million, and $138.3 million of SBA debentures were outstanding as of March 31, 2011. $73.0 million of these debentures bear interest at a rate of 3.50% per annum, including the SBA annual charge of 0.285%, and $65.3 million of these debentures bear interest at a rate of 4.369% per annum, including the SBA annual charge of 0.285%.
 
We have received exemptive relief from the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) to permit us to exclude the debt of the SBIC subsidiary guaranteed by the SBA from the definition of senior securities in the 200% asset coverage test under the 1940 Act. This allows us increased flexibility under the 200% asset coverage test by permitting us to borrow up to $150 million more than we would otherwise be able to absent the receipt of this exemptive relief.
 
We are also in the process of preparing an application to the SBA for a second SBIC license. If approved, this license would provide us with the capability to issue an additional $75 million of SBA-guaranteed debentures beyond the $150 million of SBA-guaranteed debentures we, through our wholly-owned subsidiary, currently have the ability to issue. However, there are no assurances that we will be successful in obtaining a second SBIC license from the SBA.


S-25


Table of Contents

Significant capital transactions that occurred from October 1, 2009 through March 31, 2011
 
The following table reflects the dividend distributions per share that our Board of Directors has declared on our common stock from October 1, 2009 through March 31, 2011:
 
                                         
            Amount
    Cash
    DRIP Shares
    DRIP Shares
 
Date Declared
 
Record Date
 
Payment Date
  per Share     Distribution     Issued     Value  
 
November 12, 2009
  December 10, 2009   December 29, 2009   $ 0.27     $ 9.7 million       44,420     $ 0.5 million  
January 12, 2010
  March 3, 2010   March 30, 2010     0.30       12.9 million       58,689       0.7 million  
May 3, 2010
  May 20, 2010   June 30, 2010     0.32       14.0 million       42,269       0.5 million  
August 2, 2010
  September 1, 2010   September 29, 2010     0.10       5.2 million       25,425       0.3 million  
August 2, 2010
  October 6, 2010   October 27, 2010     0.10       5.2 million       24,850       0.3 million  
August 2, 2010
  November 3, 2010   November 24, 2010     0.11       5.7 million       26,569       0.3 million  
August 2, 2010
  December 1, 2010   December 29, 2010     0.11       5.7 million       28,238       0.3 million  
November 30, 2010
  January 4, 2011   January 31, 2011     0.1066       5.4 million       36,038       0.5 million  
November 30, 2010
  February 1, 2011   February 28, 2011     0.1066       5.5 million       29,072       0.4 million  
November 30, 2010
  March 1, 2011   March 31, 2011     0.1066       6.5 million       43,766       0.6 million  
January 30, 2011
  April 1, 2011   April 29, 2011     0.1066       6.5 million       45,193       0.6 million  
January 30, 2011
  May 2, 2011   May 31, 2011     0.1066                    
January 30, 2011
  June 1, 2011   June 30, 2011     0.1066                    
 
The following table reflects shareholder transactions that occurred from October 1, 2009 through March 31, 2011:
 
                             
                    Gross Proceeds
 
Date
 
Transaction
  Shares     Share Price     (Uses)  
 
January 27, 2010
  Public offering     7,000,000     $ 11.20     $ 78.4 million  
February 25, 2010
  Underwriters’ exercise of over-allotment     300,500       11.20       3.4 million  
June 21, 2010
  Public offering(1)     9,200,000       11.50       105.8 million  
December 2010
  At-the-market offering     429,110       11.87 (2)     5.1 million  
February 4, 2011
  Public offering(1)     11,500,000       12.65       145.5 million  
 
 
(1) Includes the underwriters’ full exercise of their over-allotment option
 
 
(2) Average offering price
 
Borrowings
 
On November 16, 2009, we and Fifth Street Funding, LLC, a consolidated wholly-owned bankruptcy remote, special purpose subsidiary (“Funding”), entered into a Loan and Servicing Agreement (“Agreement”), with respect to a three-year credit facility (“Wells Fargo facility”) with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (“Wells Fargo”), as successor to Wachovia Bank, National Association (“Wachovia”), Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, as administrative agent, each of the additional institutional and conduit lenders party thereto from time to time, and each of the lender agents party thereto from time to time, in the amount of $50 million, with an accordion feature which allowed for potential future expansion of the facility up to $100 million. The facility bore interest at LIBOR plus 4.0% per annum and had a maturity date of November 16, 2012.
 
On May 26, 2010, we amended the Wells Fargo facility to expand the borrowing capacity under that facility. Pursuant to the amendment, we received an additional $50 million commitment, thereby increasing the size of the facility from $50 million to $100 million, with an accordion feature that allows for potential future expansion of that facility from a total of $100 million up to a total of $150 million. In addition, the interest rate of the Wells Fargo facility was reduced from LIBOR plus 4% per annum to LIBOR plus 3.5% per annum, with no LIBOR floor, and the maturity date of the facility was extended from November 16, 2012 to May 26, 2013. The facility may be extended for up to two additional years upon the mutual consent of Wells Fargo and each of the lender parties thereto.


S-26


Table of Contents

On November 5, 2010, we amended the Wells Fargo facility to, among other things, provide for the issuance from time to time of letters of credit for the benefit of our portfolio companies. The letters of credit are subject to certain restrictions, including a borrowing base limitation and an aggregate sublimit of $15.0 million.
 
On February 28, 2011, we amended the Wells Fargo facility to, among other things, reduce the interest rate to LIBOR plus 3.0% per annum, with no LIBOR floor, and extend the maturity date of the facility to February 25, 2014.
 
In connection with the Wells Fargo facility, we concurrently entered into (i) a Purchase and Sale Agreement with Funding, pursuant to which we will sell to Funding certain loan assets we have originated or acquired, or will originate or acquire and (ii) a Pledge Agreement with Wells Fargo, pursuant to which we pledged all of our equity interests in Funding as security for the payment of Funding’s obligations under the Agreement and other documents entered into in connection with the Wells Fargo facility.
 
The Agreement and related agreements governing the Wells Fargo facility required both us and Funding to, among other things (i) make representations and warranties regarding the collateral as well as each of our businesses, (ii) agree to certain indemnification obligations, and (iii) comply with various covenants, servicing procedures, limitations on acquiring and disposing of assets, reporting requirements and other customary requirements for similar credit facilities. The Wells Fargo facility agreements also include usual and customary default provisions such as the failure to make timely payments under the facility, a change in control of Funding, and the failure by Funding or us to materially perform under the Agreement and related agreements governing the facility, which, if not complied with, could accelerate repayment under the facility, thereby materially and adversely affecting our liquidity, financial condition and results of operations.
 
The Wells Fargo facility is secured by all of the assets of Funding, and all of our equity interest in Funding. We intend to use the net proceeds of the Wells Fargo facility to fund a portion of our loan origination activities and for general corporate purposes. Each loan origination under the facility is subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions. We cannot be assured that Funding will be able to borrow funds under the Wells Fargo facility at any particular time or at all. As of March 31, 2011, we had $60.0 million of borrowings outstanding under the Wells Fargo facility.
 
On May 27, 2010, we entered into a three-year secured syndicated revolving credit facility (“ING facility”) pursuant to a Senior Secured Revolving Credit Agreement (“ING Credit Agreement”) with certain lenders party thereto from time to time and ING Capital LLC, as administrative agent. The ING facility allows for us to borrow money at a rate of either (i) LIBOR plus 3.5% per annum or (ii) 2.5% per annum plus an alternate base rate based on the greatest of the Prime Rate, Federal Funds Rate plus 0.5% per annum or LIBOR plus 1% per annum, and had a maturity date of May 27, 2013. The ING facility also allowed us to request letters of credit from ING Capital LLC, as the issuing bank. The initial commitment under the ING facility was $90 million, and the ING facility included an accordion feature that allows for potential future expansion of the facility up to a total of $150 million. The ING facility is secured by substantially all of our assets, as well as the assets of two of our wholly-owned subsidiaries, FSFC Holdings, Inc. and FSF/MP Holdings, Inc., subject to certain exclusions for, among other things, equity interests in our SBIC subsidiary and equity interests in Fifth Street Funding, LLC (the special purpose subsidiary established pursuant to the Wells Fargo facility) as further set forth in a Guarantee, Pledge and Security Agreement (“ING Security Agreement”) entered into in connection with the ING Credit Agreement, among FSFC Holdings, Inc., FSF/MP Holdings, Inc., ING Capital LLC, as collateral agent, and us. Neither our SBIC subsidiary nor Fifth Street Funding, LLC is party to the ING facility and their respective assets have not been pledged in connection therewith. The ING facility provides that we may use the proceeds and letters of credit under the facility for general corporate purposes, including acquiring and funding leveraged loans, mezzanine loans, high-yield securities, convertible securities, preferred stock, common stock and other investments.
 
On February 22, 2011, we amended the ING facility to, among other things, expand the borrowing capacity to $215 million. In addition, the ING facility’s accordion feature was increased to allow for potential future expansion up to a total of $300 million and the maturity date was extended to February 22, 2014.


S-27


Table of Contents

Pursuant to the ING Security Agreement, FSFC Holdings, Inc. and FSF/MP Holdings, Inc. guaranteed the obligations under the ING Security Agreement, including our obligations to the lenders and the administrative agent under the ING Credit Agreement. Additionally, we pledged our entire equity interests in FSFC Holdings, Inc. and FSF/MP Holdings, Inc. to the collateral agent pursuant to the terms of the ING Security Agreement.
 
The ING Credit Agreement and related agreements governing the ING facility required FSFC Holdings, Inc., FSF/MP Holdings, Inc. and us to, among other things (i) make representations and warranties regarding the collateral as well as each of our businesses, (ii) agree to certain indemnification obligations, and (iii) agree to comply with various affirmative and negative covenants and other customary requirements for similar credit facilities. The ING facility documents also include usual and customary default provisions such as the failure to make timely payments under the facility, the occurrence of a change in control, and the failure by us to materially perform under the ING Credit Agreement and related agreements governing the facility, which, if not complied with, could accelerate repayment under the facility, thereby materially and adversely affecting our liquidity, financial condition and results of operations.
 
Each loan or letter of credit originated under the ING facility is subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions. We cannot be assured that we will be able to borrow funds under the ING facility at any particular time or at all.
 
As of March 31, 2011, we had $74.0 million of borrowings outstanding under the ING facility.
 
As of March 31, 2011, except for assets that were funded through our SBIC subsidiary, substantially all of our assets were pledged as collateral under the Wells Fargo facility or the ING facility.
 
Interest expense for the three and six months ended March 31, 2011 was $2.7 million and $4.7 million, respectively. Interest expense for the three and six months ended March 31, 2010 was $0.3 million and $0.4 million, respectively.


S-28


Table of Contents

The following table describes significant financial covenants with which we must comply under each of our credit facilities on a quarterly basis:
 
                         
Facility
 
Financial Covenant
 
Description
  Target Value   Reported Value(1)
 
Wells Fargo facility
  Minimum shareholders’ equity (inclusive of affiliates)   Net assets shall not be less than $510 million plus 50% of the aggregate net proceeds of all sales of equity interests after February 25, 2011     $510 million       $575 million  
    Minimum shareholders’ equity (exclusive of affiliates)   Net assets exclusive of affiliates other than Funding shall not be less than $250 million     $250 million       $500 million  
    Asset coverage ratio   Asset coverage ratio shall not be less than 2.00:1     2.00:1       5.78:1  
ING facility
  Minimum shareholders’ equity   Net assets shall not be less than the greater of (a) 55% of total assets; and (b) $385 million plus 50% of the aggregate net proceeds of all sales of equity interests after February 24, 2010     $439 million       $575 million  
    Asset coverage ratio   Asset coverage ratio shall not be less than 2.25:1     2.25:1       7.46:1  
    Interest coverage ratio   Interest coverage ratio shall not be less than 2.50:1     2.50:1       31.48:1  
    Eligible portfolio investments test   Aggregate value of (a) Cash and cash equivalents and (b) Portfolio investments rated 1, 2 or 3 shall not be less than $175 million     $175 million       $332 million  
 
 
(1) As contractually required, we report financial covenants based on the last filed quarterly or annual report, in this case our Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2010.


S-29


Table of Contents

 
The following table reflects credit facility and debenture transactions that occurred from October 1, 2009 through March 31, 2011. Amounts available and drawn are as of March 31, 2011:
 
                                                 
            Total
      Total
         
            Facility
  Upfront
  Facility
    Amount
  Interest
Facility
 
Date
 
Transaction
  Amount   Fee Paid   Availability    
Drawn
 
Rate
 
Wells Fargo facility   November 16, 2009   Entered into credit facility     $50 million       $0.8 million                       LIBOR + 4.00%  
    May 26, 2010   Expanded credit facility     100 million       0.9 million                       LIBOR + 3.50%  
    February 28, 2011   Amended credit facility     100 million       0.4 million       $78 million (1)     $60 million       LIBOR + 3.00%  
ING facility
  May 27, 2010   Entered into credit facility     90 million       0.8 million                       LIBOR + 3.50%  
    February 22, 2011   Expanded credit facility     215 million       1.6 million       215 million       74 million       LIBOR + 3.50%  
SBA
  February 16, 2010   Received capital commitment     75 million       0.8 million                          
    September 21, 2010   Received capital commitment     150 million       0.8 million       150 million       138.3 million       3.50% (2)
4.369% (3)
 
 
 
(1) Availability to increase upon our decision to further collateralize the facility.
 
 
(2) For the first $73.0 million; includes the SBA annual charge of 0.285%.
 
 
(3) For the remaining $65.3 million; includes the SBA annual charge of 0.285%.
 
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
 
We may be a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financial needs of our portfolio companies. As of March 31, 2011, our only off-balance sheet arrangements consisted of $85.6 million of unfunded commitments, which was comprised of $82.1 million to provide debt financing to certain of our portfolio companies and $3.5 million related to unfunded limited partnership interests. As of September 30, 2010, our only off-balance sheet arrangements consisted of $49.5 million, which was comprised of $46.7 million to provide debt financing to certain of our portfolio companies and $2.8 million related to unfunded limited partnership interests. Such commitments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit risk in excess of the amount recognized in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities and are not reflected on our Consolidated Statement of Assets and Liabilities.
 
Contractual Obligations
 
On February 3, 2010, our SBIC subsidiary received a license, effective February 1, 2010, from the SBA to operate as an SBIC. The SBIC license allows our SBIC subsidiary to obtain leverage by issuing SBA-guaranteed debentures, subject to the issuance of a capital commitment by the SBA and other customary procedures. SBA-guaranteed debentures are non-recourse, interest-only debentures with interest payable semi-annually and have a ten year maturity. The principal amount of SBA-guaranteed debentures is not required to be paid prior to maturity but may be prepaid at any time without penalty. The interest rate of SBA-guaranteed debentures is fixed on a semi-annual basis at a market-driven spread over U.S. Treasury Notes with 10-year maturities. As of March 31, 2011, we had $138.3 million of SBA debentures payable. $73.0 million of these debentures bear interest at a rate of 3.50% per annum, including the SBA annual charge of 0.285%, and $65.3 million of these debentures bear interest at a rate of 4.369% per annum, including the SBA annual charge of 0.285%.
 
On November 16, 2009, we entered into the Wells Fargo facility in the amount of $50 million with an accordion feature, which allowed for potential future expansion of the Wells Fargo facility up to $100 million. The Wells Fargo facility bore interest at LIBOR plus 4% per annum and had a maturity date of November 26, 2012. On May 26, 2010, we amended the Wells Fargo facility to expand our borrowing capacity under that facility. Pursuant to the amendment, we received an additional $50 million commitment, thereby increasing the


S-30


Table of Contents

size of the Wells Fargo facility from $50 million to $100 million, with an accordion feature that allows for potential future expansion of that facility from a total of $100 million up to a total of $150 million. In addition, the interest rate of the Wells Fargo facility was reduced from LIBOR plus 4% per annum to LIBOR plus 3.5% per annum, with no LIBOR floor, and the maturity date of the facility was extended from November 16, 2012 to May 26, 2013. On November 5, 2010, we amended the Wells Fargo facility to, among other things, provide for the issuance from time to time of letters of credit for the benefit of our portfolio companies. The letters of credit are subject to certain restrictions, including a borrowing base limitation and an aggregate sublimit of $15.0 million. On February 28, 2011, we amended the Wells Fargo Facility to, among other things, reduce the interest rate to LIBOR plus 3.0% per annum, with no LIBOR floor, and extend the maturity date of the facility to February 25, 2014.
 
On May 27, 2010, we entered into the ING facility, which allows for us to borrow money at a rate of either (i) LIBOR plus 3.5% per annum or (ii) 2.5% per annum plus an alternate base rate based on the greatest of the Prime Rate, Federal Funds Rate plus 0.5% per annum or LIBOR plus 1% per annum, and has a maturity date of May 27, 2013. The ING facility also allows us to request letters of credit from ING Capital LLC, as the issuing bank. The initial commitment under the ING facility was $90 million, and the ING facility included an accordion feature that allowed for potential future expansion of the facility up to a total of $150 million. On February 22, 2011, we amended the ING facility to expand the borrowing capacity to $215 million. In addition, the ING facility’s accordion feature was increased to allow for potential future expansion up to a total of $300 million and the maturity date was extended to February 22, 2014.
 
As of March 31, 2011, we had $74.0 million of borrowings outstanding under the ING facility and $60.0 million of borrowings outstanding under the Wells Fargo facility.
 
The table below reflects information pertaining to debt outstanding under the SBA debentures payable, the Wells Fargo facility and the ING facility:
 
                                 
                Weighted Average
    Maximum
 
                Debt Outstanding
    Debt Outstanding
 
    Debt Outstanding
    Debt Outstanding
    For the Six Months
    For the Six Months
 
    as of September 30,
    as of March 31,
    Ended March 31,
    Ended March 31,
 
    2010     2011     2011     2011  
 
SBA debentures payable
  $ 73,000,000     $ 138,300,000     $ 104,859,341     $ 138,300,000  
Wells Fargo facility
          60,000,000       35,489,011       85,000,000  
ING facility
          74,000,000       22,576,923       90,000,000  
Total debt
    73,000,000       272,300,000       162,925,275       298,300,000  
 
The following table reflects our contractual obligations arising from the SBA debentures payable, the Wells Fargo facility and the ING facility:
 
                                         
    Payments Due by Period as of March 31, 2011  
    Total     < 1 Year     1-3 Years     3-5 Years     > 5 Years  
 
SBA debentures payable
  $ 138,300,000     $     $     $     $ 138,300,000  
Interest due on SBA debentures
    52,638,157       5,203,917       10,815,914       10,830,728       25,787,598  
Wells Fargo facility
    60,000,000       60,000,000                    
Interest due on Wells Fargo facility
    3,920,944       1,202,611       2,718,333              
ING facility
    74,000,000       74,000,000                    
Interest due on ING facility
    5,802,446       1,627,863       4,174,583              
Total
  $ 334,661,547     $ 142,034,391     $ 17,708,830     $ 10,830,728     $ 164,087,598  


S-31


Table of Contents

A summary of the composition of unfunded commitments (consisting of revolvers, term loans and limited partnership interests) as of March 31, 2011 and September 30, 2010 is shown in the table below:
 
                 
    March 31, 2011     September 30, 2010  
 
Traffic Control & Safety Corporation
  $ 2,250,000     $  
HealthDrive Corporation
    1,000,000       1,500,000  
IZI Medical Products, Inc. 
    2,500,000       2,500,000  
Trans-Trade, Inc. 
    1,000,000       500,000  
Riverlake Equity Partners II, LP (limited partnership interest)
    877,895       966,360  
Riverside Fund IV, LP (limited partnership interest)
    583,522       864,175  
ADAPCO, Inc. 
    5,250,000       5,750,000  
AmBath/ReBath Holdings, Inc. 
    1,500,000       1,500,000  
JTC Education, Inc. 
    5,159,479       9,062,453  
Tegra Medical, LLC
    2,500,000       4,000,000  
Vanguard Vinyl, Inc. 
          1,250,000  
Flatout, Inc. 
    1,500,000       1,500,000  
Psilos Group Partners IV, LP (limited partnership interest)
    1,000,000       1,000,000  
Mansell Group, Inc. 
    1,000,000       2,000,000  
NDSSI Holdings, Inc. 
    1,500,000       1,500,000  
Eagle Hospital Physicians, Inc. 
    2,500,000       2,500,000  
Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC
    3,000,000       3,623,148  
Epic Acquisition, Inc. 
    2,400,000       2,700,000  
Specialty Bakers, LLC
    4,000,000       2,000,000  
Rail Acquisition Corp. 
    4,879,435       4,798,897  
Bunker Hill Capital II (QP), L.P. (limited partnership interest)
    1,000,000        
CRGT, Inc. 
    12,500,000        
Welocalize, Inc. 
    3,750,000        
Miche Bag, LLC
    5,000,000        
Dominion Diagnostics, LLC
    5,000,000        
Advanced Pain Management
    400,000        
DISA, Inc. 
    4,000,000        
Saddleback Fence and Vinyl Products, Inc. 
    400,000        
Best Vinyl Fence & Deck, LLC
    1,000,000        
Physicians Pharmacy Alliance, Inc. 
    2,000,000        
Cardon Healthcare Network, LLC
    2,000,000        
IOS Acquisitions, Inc. 
    2,000,000        
Phoenix Brands Merger Sub LLC
    2,142,857        
                 
Total
  $ 85,593,188     $ 49,515,033  
                 
 
Regulated Investment Company Status and Dividends
 
We elected, effective as of January 2, 2008, to be treated as a RIC under Subchapter M of the Code. As long as we qualify as a RIC, we will not be taxed on our investment company taxable income or realized net capital gains, to the extent that such taxable income or gains are distributed, or deemed to be distributed, to stockholders on a timely basis.
 
Taxable income generally differs from net income for financial reporting purposes due to temporary and permanent differences in the recognition of income and expenses, and generally excludes net unrealized


S-32


Table of Contents

appreciation or depreciation until realized. Dividends declared and paid by us in a year may differ from taxable income for that year as such dividends may include the distribution of current year taxable income or the distribution of prior year taxable income carried forward into and distributed in the current year. Distributions also may include returns of capital.
 
To maintain RIC tax treatment, we must, among other things, distribute, with respect to each taxable year, at least 90% of our investment company taxable income (i.e., our net ordinary income and our realized net short-term capital gains in excess of realized net long-term capital losses, if any). As a RIC, we are also subject to a federal excise tax, based on distributive requirements of our taxable income on a calendar year basis (e.g., calendar year 2011). We anticipate timely distribution of our taxable income within the tax rules; however, we incurred a de minimis U.S. federal excise tax for the calendar year 2010. We intend to distribute to our stockholders between 90% and 100% of our annual taxable income (which includes our taxable interest and fee income). However, in future periods, we will be partially dependent on our SBIC subsidiary for cash distributions to enable us to meet the RIC distribution requirements. Our SBIC subsidiary may be limited by the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, and SBA regulations governing SBICs, from making certain distributions to us that may be necessary to enable us to maintain our status as a RIC. We may have to request a waiver of the SBA’s restrictions for our SBIC subsidiary to make certain distributions to maintain our RIC status. We cannot assure you that the SBA will grant such waiver. Also, the covenants under the Wells Fargo facility could, under certain circumstances, restrict Fifth Street Funding, LLC from making distributions to us and, as a result, hinder our ability to satisfy the distribution requirement. Similarly, the covenants contained in the ING facility may prohibit us from making distributions to our stockholders, and, as a result, could hinder our ability to satisfy the distribution requirement. In addition, we may retain for investment some or all of our net taxable capital gains (i.e., realized net long-term capital gains in excess of realized net short-term capital losses) and treat such amounts as deemed distributions to our stockholders. If we do this, our stockholders would be treated as if they received actual distributions of the capital gains we retained and then reinvested the net after-tax proceeds in our common stock. Our stockholders also may be eligible to claim tax credits (or, in certain circumstances, tax refunds) equal to their allocable share of the tax we paid on the capital gains deemed distributed to them. To the extent our taxable earnings for a fiscal taxable year fall below the total amount of our dividends for that fiscal year, a portion of those dividend distributions may be deemed a return of capital to our stockholders.
 
We may not be able to achieve operating results that will allow us to make distributions at a specific level or to increase the amount of these distributions from time to time. In addition, we may be limited in our ability to make distributions due to the asset coverage test for borrowings applicable to us as a business development company under the 1940 Act and due to provisions in our credit facilities. If we do not distribute a certain percentage of our taxable income annually, we would suffer adverse tax consequences, including possible loss of our status as a RIC. We cannot assure stockholders that they will receive any distributions or distributions at a particular level.
 
Pursuant to a recent revenue procedure (Revenue Procedure 2010-12), or the Revenue Procedure, issued by the Internal Revenue Service, or IRS, the IRS has indicated that it will treat distributions from certain publicly traded RICs (including BDCs) that are paid part in cash and part in stock as dividends that would satisfy the RIC’s annual distribution requirements and qualify for the dividends paid deduction for federal income tax purposes. In order to qualify for such treatment, the Revenue Procedure requires that at least 10% of the total distribution be payable in cash and that each stockholder have a right to elect to receive its entire distribution in cash. If too many stockholders elect to receive cash, each stockholder electing to receive cash must receive a proportionate share of the cash to be distributed (although no stockholder electing to receive cash may receive less than 10% of such stockholder’s distribution in cash). This Revenue Procedure applies to distributions declared on or before December 31, 2012 with respect to taxable years ending on or before December 31, 2011. We have no current intention of paying dividends in shares of our stock.
 
Related Party Transactions
 
We have entered into an investment advisory agreement with Fifth Street Management LLC, our investment adviser. Fifth Street Management is controlled by Leonard M. Tannenbaum, its managing member


S-33


Table of Contents

and the chairman of our Board of Directors and our chief executive officer. Pursuant to the investment advisory agreement, fees payable to our investment adviser will be equal to (a) a base management fee of 2.0% of the value of our gross assets, which includes any borrowings for investment purposes, and (b) an incentive fee based on our performance. Our investment adviser agreed to permanently waive that portion of its base management fee attributable to our assets held in the form of cash and cash equivalents as of the end of each quarter beginning March 31, 2010. The incentive fee consists of two parts. The first part is calculated and payable quarterly in arrears and equals 20% of our “Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income” for the immediately preceding quarter, subject to a preferred return, or “hurdle,” and a “catch up” feature. The second part is determined and payable in arrears as of the end of each fiscal year (or upon termination of the investment advisory agreement) and equals 20% of our “Incentive Fee Capital Gains,” which equals our realized capital gains on a cumulative basis from inception through the end of the year, if any, computed net of all realized capital losses and unrealized capital depreciation on a cumulative basis, less the aggregate amount of any previously paid capital gain incentive fee.
 
The investment advisory agreement may be terminated by either party without penalty upon no fewer than 60 days’ written notice to the other. During the three and six months ended March 31, 2011, we paid our investment adviser $8.9 million and $16.2 million, respectively, under the investment advisory agreement.
 
Pursuant to the administration agreement with FSC, Inc., which is controlled by Mr. Tannenbaum, FSC, Inc. will furnish us with the facilities and administrative services necessary to conduct our day-to-day operations, including equipment, clerical, bookkeeping and recordkeeping services at such facilities. In addition, FSC, Inc. will assist us in connection with the determination and publishing of our net asset value, the preparation and filing of tax returns and the printing and dissemination of reports to our stockholders. We will pay FSC, Inc. our allocable portion of overhead and other expenses incurred by it in performing its obligations under the administration agreement, including a portion of the rent and the compensation of our chief financial officer and chief compliance officer and their respective staffs. FSC, Inc. has voluntarily determined to forgo receiving reimbursement for the services performed for us by our chief compliance officer. Although FSC, Inc. currently intends to forgo its right to receive such reimbursement, it is under no obligation to do so and may cease to do so at any time in the future. The administration agreement may be terminated by either party without penalty upon no fewer than 60 days’ written notice to the other. During the three and six months ended March 31, 2011, we paid FSC, Inc. $0.6 million and $1.3 million, respectively, under the administration agreement.
 
We have also entered into a license agreement with Fifth Street Capital LLC pursuant to which Fifth Street Capital LLC has agreed to grant us a non-exclusive, royalty-free license to use the name “Fifth Street.” Under this agreement, we will have a right to use the “Fifth Street” name for so long as Fifth Street Management LLC or one of its affiliates remains our investment adviser. Other than with respect to this limited license, we will have no legal right to the “Fifth Street” name. Fifth Street Capital LLC is controlled by Mr. Tannenbaum, its managing member.
 
Recent Developments
 
On April 1, 2011, we repaid $18.0 million under the ING facility. On April 12, 2011, we repaid $60.0 million and $56.0 million under the Wells Fargo facility and ING facility, respectively. As of May 4, 2011, we had no loans outstanding under our credit facilities.
 
On April 12, 2011, we closed a private offering of $150 million aggregate principal amount of our 5.375% convertible senior notes due 2016. These convertible senior notes were sold only to qualified institutional buyers (as defined in the Securities Act) pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act. We granted the initial purchasers for the offering the option, which expired on May 7, 2011, to purchase up to an additional $22.5 million aggregate principal amount of the convertible senior notes. In addition, Leonard M. Tannenbaum, our chief executive officer, purchased $2 million principal amount of the convertible senior notes directly from us in a private placement.
 
The convertible senior notes are unsecured and bear interest at a rate of 5.375% per year, payable semiannually. In certain circumstances, or at any time on or after January 1, 2016, the convertible senior notes


S-34


Table of Contents

are convertible into shares of our common stock at a conversion rate of 67.7415 shares of common stock per $1,000 principal amount of convertible senior notes, which is equivalent to a conversion price of approximately $14.76 per share of our common stock. The conversion rate is subject to customary anti-dilution adjustments, including for any cash dividends or distributions paid on shares of our common stock in excess of the monthly dividend of $0.1066 per share we are currently paying on our common stock. In addition, if certain corporate events occur in respect of us, holders of the convertible senior notes may require us to repurchase for cash all or part of their convertible senior notes at a repurchase price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the convertible senior notes to be repurchased, plus accrued and unpaid interest through, but excluding, the required repurchase date. We do not have the right to redeem the convertible senior notes prior to maturity. The convertible senior notes will mature on April 1, 2016, unless repurchased or converted in accordance with their terms prior to such date.
 
On April 29, 2011, we paid a dividend in the amount of $0.1066 per share to stockholders of record on April 1, 2011.
 
On May 2, 2011, our Board of Directors declared the following dividends:
 
  •  $0.1066 per share, payable on July 29, 2011 to stockholders of record on July 1, 2011;
 
  •  $0.1066 per share, payable on August 31, 2011 to stockholders of record on August 1, 2011; and
 
  •  $0.1066 per share, payable on September 30, 2011 to stockholders of record on September 1, 2011.
 
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
 
See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this prospectus supplement for a description of recent accounting pronouncements, including the expected dates of adoption and the anticipated impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements.


S-35


Table of Contents

 
UNDERWRITING
 
UBS Securities LLC, RBC Capital Markets, LLC and Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. are acting as joint book-running managers of the offering and as representatives of the underwriters named below. Subject to the terms and conditions stated in the underwriting agreement dated          , 2011, each underwriter named below severally agrees to purchase the number of shares indicated in the following table:
 
         
Underwriters
  Number of Shares  
 
UBS Securities LLC
       
RBC Capital Markets, LLC
       
Deutsche Bank Securities Inc.
       
         
Total
    5,000,000  
         
 
The underwriters are committed to take and pay for all of the shares being offered, if any are purchased, other than the shares covered by the option described below.
 
Over-allotment Option
 
If the underwriters sell more shares than the total number set forth in the table above, the underwriters have an option to buy up to an additional 750,000 shares from us. They may exercise that option for 30 days. If any shares are purchased pursuant to this option, the underwriters will severally purchase shares in approximately the same proportion as set forth in the table above.
 
Commissions and Discounts
 
The following table shows the per share and total underwriting discounts and commissions to be paid by us to the underwriters. These amounts are shown assuming both no exercise and full exercise of the underwriters’ option to purchase additional shares.
 
                 
Paid by Fifth Street
  No Exercise     Full Exercise  
 
Per Share
  $           $        
Total
  $           $        
 
Shares sold by the underwriters to the public will initially be offered at the public offering price set forth on the cover of this prospectus supplement. If all the shares are not sold at the public offering price, the representatives may change the offering price and the other selling terms. The offering of the shares by the underwriters is subject to receipt and acceptance and subject to the underwriters’ right to reject any order in whole or in part.
 
We estimate that our share of the total expenses of the offering, excluding underwriting discounts, will be approximately $600,000.
 
We have agreed to indemnify the several underwriters against certain liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act.
 
Lock-up Agreements
 
We and our officers and directors have agreed with the underwriters, subject to certain exceptions, not to issue, sell, dispose of or hedge any of our common stock or securities convertible into or exchangeable for shares of common stock during the period from the date of this prospectus supplement continuing through the date 30 days after the date of this prospectus supplement, except with the prior written consent of UBS Securities LLC, RBC Capital Markets, LLC and Deutsche Bank Securities Inc.
 
The 30-day restricted period described in the preceding paragraph will be automatically extended if: (1) during the last 17 days of the 30-day restricted period we issue an earnings release or announce material news or a material event; or (2) prior to the expiration of the 30-day restricted period, we announce that we will release earnings results during the 15-day period following the last day of the 30-day restricted period, in which case the restrictions described in the preceding paragraph will continue to apply until the expiration of the 18-day period beginning on the issuance of the earnings release of the announcement of the material news or material event.


S-36


Table of Contents

Price Stabilizations and Short Positions
 
In connection with the offering, UBS Securities LLC, on behalf of the underwriters, may purchase and sell shares of common stock in the open market. These transactions may include short sales, stabilizing transactions and purchases to cover positions created by short sales. Short sales involve the sale by the underwriters of a greater number of shares than they are required to purchase in the offering. “Covered” short sales are sales made in an amount not greater than the underwriters’ option to purchase additional shares from us in the offering. The underwriters may close out any covered short position by either exercising their option to purchase additional shares or purchasing shares in the open market. In determining the source of shares to close out the covered short position, the underwriters will consider, among other things, the price of shares available for purchase in the open market as compared to the price at which they may purchase additional shares pursuant to the option granted to them. “Naked” short sales are any sales in excess of such option. The underwriters must close out any naked short position by purchasing shares in the open market. A naked short position is more likely to be created if the underwriters are concerned that there may be downward pressure on the price of the common stock in the open market after pricing that could adversely affect investors who purchase in the offering. Stabilizing transactions consist of various bids for or purchases of common stock made by the underwriters in the open market prior to the completion of the offering.
 
The underwriters may also impose a penalty bid. This occurs when a particular underwriter repays to the underwriters a portion of the underwriting discount received by it because the representatives have repurchased shares sold by or for the account of such underwriter in stabilizing or short covering transactions.
 
Purchases to cover a short position and stabilizing transactions, as well as other purchases by the underwriters for their own accounts, may have the effect of preventing or retarding a decline in the market price of our stock, and together with the imposition of the penalty bid, may stabilize, maintain or otherwise affect the market price of our common stock. As a result, the price of the common stock may be higher than the price that otherwise might exist in the open market. If these activities are commenced, they may be discontinued at any time. These transactions may be effected on the New York Stock Exchange, in the over-the-counter market or otherwise.
 
Potential Conflicts of Interest
 
In the ordinary course of business, the underwriters or their affiliates have engaged and may in the future engage in various financing, commercial banking and investment banking services with, and provide financial advisory services to, us and our affiliates, for which they have received or may in the future receive customary fees and expenses, including acting as underwriters for our equity offerings. Certain of the net proceeds from the sale of our common stock, not including underwriting compensation, may be paid to affiliates of UBS Securities LLC and RBC Capital Markets, LLC in connection with the repayment of debt owed under the ING facility. As a result, UBS Securities LLC and RBC Capital Markets, LLC and/or their affiliates may receive more than 5% of the net proceeds of this offering, not including underwriting compensation.
 
Sales Outside the United States
 
No action has been taken in any jurisdiction (except in the United States) that would permit a public offering of the common shares, or the possession, circulation or distribution of this prospectus supplement, the accompanying prospectus or any other material relating to us or the common shares in any jurisdiction where action for that purpose is required. Accordingly, the common shares may not be offered or sold, directly or indirectly, and none of this prospectus supplement, the accompanying prospectus or any other offering material or advertisements in connection with the common shares may be distributed or published, in or from any country or jurisdiction except in compliance with any applicable rules and regulations of any such country or jurisdiction.
 
Each of the underwriters may arrange to sell common shares offered hereby in certain jurisdictions outside the United States, either directly or through affiliates, where they are permitted to do so.


S-37


Table of Contents

NOTICE TO PROSPECTIVE INVESTORS IN THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AREA
 
In relation to each Member State of the European Economic Area which has implemented the Prospectus Directive (each, a Relevant Member State), each underwriter has represented and agreed that with effect from and including the date on which the Prospectus Directive is implemented in that Relevant Member State (the Relevant Implementation Date) it has not made and will not make an offer of shares to the public in that Relevant Member State prior to the publication of a prospectus supplement and accompanying prospectus in relation to the shares which has been approved by the competent authority in that Relevant Member State or, where appropriate, approved in another Relevant Member State and notified to the competent authority in that Relevant Member State, all in accordance with the Prospectus Directive, except that it may, with effect from and including the Relevant Implementation Date, make an offer of shares to the public in that Relevant Member State at any time:
 
(a) to any legal entity which is a qualified investor as defined in the Prospectus Directive;
 
(b) to fewer than 100 or, if the Relevant Member State has implemented the relevant provision of the 2010 PD Amending Directive, 150, natural or legal persons (other than qualified investors as defined in the Prospectus Directive), as permitted under the Prospectus Directive, subject to obtaining the prior consent of the representative for any such offer; or
 
(c) in any other circumstances which do not require the publication by the issuer of a prospectus supplement and accompanying prospectus pursuant to Article 3 of the Prospectus Directive.
 
For the purposes of this provision, the expression an “offer of shares to the public” in relation to any shares in any Relevant Member State means the communication in any form and by any means of sufficient information on the terms of the offer and the shares to be offered so as to enable an investor to decide to purchase or subscribe the shares, as the same may be varied in that Relevant Member State by any measure implementing the Prospectus Directive in that Relevant Member State and the expression Prospectus Directive means Directive 2003/71/EC (and amendments thereto, including the 2010 PD Amending Directive, to the extent implemented in the Relevant Member State), and includes any relevant implementing measure in the Relevant Member State and the expression “2010 PD Amending Directive” means Directive 2010/73/EU.
 
Each underwriter has represented and agreed that:
 
  •  it has only communicated or caused to be communicated and will only communicate or cause to be communicated an invitation or inducement to engage in investment activity (within the meaning of Section 21 of the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000, or “FSMA”) received by it in connection with the issue or sale of the shares in circumstances in which Section 21(1) of the FSMA does not apply to the Issuer; and
 
  •  it has complied and will comply with all applicable provisions of the FSMA with respect to anything done by it in relation to the shares in, from or otherwise involving the United Kingdom.
 
United Kingdom
 
In addition, each underwriter: (a) has only communicated or caused to be communicated and will only communicate or cause to be communicated any invitation or inducement to engage in investment activity (within the meaning of Section 21 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (the “FSMA”) received by it in connection with the issue or sale of shares of common stock in circumstances in which Section 21(1) of the FSMA does not apply to us, and (b) has complied and will comply with all applicable provisions of the FSMA with respect to anything done by it in relation to the shares in, from or otherwise involving the United Kingdom.


S-38


Table of Contents

Without limitation to the other restrictions referred to herein, this prospectus supplement is directed only at (1) persons outside the United Kingdom; (2) persons having professional experience in matters relating to investments who fall within the definition of “investment professionals” in Article 19(5) of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Financial Promotion) Order 2005; or (3) high net worth bodies corporate, unincorporated associations and partnerships and trustees of high value trusts as described in Article 49(2) of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Financial Promotion) Order 2005. Without limitation to the other restrictions referred to herein, any investment or investment activity to which this prospectus supplement relates is available only to, and will be engaged in only with, such persons, and persons within the United Kingdom who receive this communication (other than persons who fall within (2) or (3) above) should not rely or act upon this communication.
 
Notice to Prospective Investors in Switzerland
 
This document as well as any other material relating to the shares of our common stock which are the subject of the offering contemplated by this prospectus do not constitute an issue prospectus pursuant to Article 652a or Article 1156 of the Swiss Code of Obligations. Our common stock will not be listed on the SWX Swiss Exchange and, therefore, the documents relating to our common stock, including, but not limited to, this document, do not claim to comply with the disclosure standards of the listing rules of SWX Swiss Exchange and corresponding prospectus schemes annexed to the listing rules of the SWX Swiss Exchange.
 
We have not been authorised by the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority as a foreign collective investment scheme under Article 120 of the Swiss Collective Investment Schemes Act dated 23 June 2006 (“CISA”). Hence this prospectus does not constitute a prospectus for public advertising of foreign collective investment schemes within the meaning of Article 120 CISA. Accordingly, the shares of our common stock may not be offered or distributed in or from Switzerland unless the offer or distribution is exclusively addressed to qualified investors as defined in section 10 CISA and its implementing ordinances, and only under use of the usual advertising media for this kind of business.
 
Our common stock is being offered in Switzerland by way of a private placement, i.e. to qualified investors as defined in section 10 CISA only, without any public offer and only to investors who do not purchase shares of our common stock with the intention to distribute them to the public. The investors will be individually approached by us from time to time.
 
This document as well as any other material relating to our common stock is personal and confidential and does not constitute an offer to any other person. This document may only be used by those investors to whom it has been handed out in connection with the offering described herein and may neither directly nor indirectly be distributed or made available to other persons without our express consent. It may not be used in connection with any other offer and shall in particular not be copied and/or distributed to the public in (or from) Switzerland.
 
Notice to Prospective Investors in Australia
 
This prospectus is not a formal disclosure document and has not been, nor will be, lodged with the Australian Securities and Investments Commission. It does not purport to contain all information that an investor or their professional advisers would expect to find in a prospectus or other disclosure document (as defined in the Corporations Act 2001 (Australia)) for the purposes of Part 6D.2 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Australia) or in a product disclosure statement for the purposes of Part 7.9 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Australia), in either case, in relation to the securities.
 
The securities are not being offered in Australia to “retail clients” as defined in sections 761G and 761GA of the Corporations Act 2001 (Australia). This offering is being made in Australia solely to “wholesale clients” for the purposes of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001 (Australia) and, as such, no prospectus, product disclosure statement or other disclosure document in relation to the securities has been, or will be, prepared.


S-39


Table of Contents

This prospectus does not constitute an offer in Australia other than to wholesale clients. By submitting an application for our securities, you represent and warrant to us that you are a wholesale client for the purposes of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001 (Australia). If any recipient of this prospectus is not a wholesale client, no offer of, or invitation to apply for, our securities shall be deemed to be made to such recipient and no applications for our securities will be accepted from such recipient. Any offer to a recipient in Australia, and any agreement arising from acceptance of such offer, is personal and may only be accepted by the recipient. In addition, by applying for our securities you undertake to us that, for a period of 12 months from the date of issue of the securities, you will not transfer any interest in the securities to any person in Australia other than to a wholesale client.
 
Notice to Prospective Investors in Hong Kong
 
Our securities may not be offered or sold in Hong Kong, by means of this prospectus or any document other than (i) to “professional investors” within the meaning of the Securities and Futures Ordinance (Cap.571, Laws of Hong Kong) and any rules made thereunder, or (ii) in circumstances which do not constitute an offer to the public within the meaning of the Companies Ordinance (Cap.32, Laws of Hong Kong), or (iii) in other circumstances which do not result in the document being a “prospectus” within the meaning of the Companies Ordinance (Cap.32, Laws of Hong Kong). No advertisement, invitation or document relating to our securities may be issued or may be in the possession of any person for the purpose of issue (in each case whether in Hong Kong or elsewhere) which is directed at, or the contents of which are likely to be accessed or read by, the public in Hong Kong (except if permitted to do so under the securities laws of Hong Kong) other than with respect to the securities which are or are intended to be disposed of only to persons outside Hong Kong or only to “professional investors” within the meaning of the Securities and Futures Ordinance (Cap. 571, Laws of Hong Kong) and any rules made thereunder.
 
Notice to Prospective Investors in Japan
 
Our securities have not been and will not be registered under the Financial Instruments and Exchange Law of Japan (the Financial Instruments and Exchange Law) and our securities will not be offered or sold, directly or indirectly, in Japan, or to, or for the benefit of, any resident of Japan (which term as used herein means any person resident in Japan, including any corporation or other entity organized under the laws of Japan), or to others for re-offering or resale, directly or indirectly, in Japan, or to a resident of Japan, except pursuant to an exemption from the registration requirements of, and otherwise in compliance with, the Financial Instruments and Exchange Law and any other applicable laws, regulations and ministerial guidelines of Japan.
 
Notice to Prospective Investors in Singapore
 
This document has not been registered as a prospectus with the Monetary Authority of Singapore and in Singapore, the offer and sale of our securities is made pursuant to exemptions provided in sections 274 and 275 of the Securities and Futures Act, Chapter 289 of Singapore (“SFA”). Accordingly, this prospectus and any other document or material in connection with the offer or sale, or invitation for subscription or purchase, of our securities may not be circulated or distributed, nor may our securities be offered or sold, or be made the subject of an invitation for subscription or purchase, whether directly or indirectly, to persons in Singapore other than (i) to an institutional investor as defined in Section 4A of the SFA pursuant to Section 274 of the SFA, (ii) to a relevant person as defined in section 275(2) of the SFA pursuant to Section 275(1) of the SFA, or any person pursuant to Section 275(1A) of the SFA, and in accordance with the conditions specified in Section 275 of the SFA or (iii) otherwise pursuant to, and in accordance with the conditions of, any other applicable provision of the SFA, in each case subject to compliance with the conditions (if any) set forth in the SFA. Moreover, this document is not a prospectus as defined in the SFA. Accordingly, statutory liability under the SFA in relation to the content of prospectuses would not apply. Prospective investors in Singapore should consider carefully whether an investment in our securities is suitable for them.


S-40


Table of Contents

Where our securities are subscribed or purchased under Section 275 of the SFA by a relevant person which is:
 
(a) by a corporation (which is not an accredited investor as defined in Section 4A of the SFA) the sole business of which is to hold investments and the entire share capital of which is owned by one or more individuals, each of whom is an accredited investor; or
 
(b) for a trust (where the trustee is not an accredited investor) whose sole purpose is to hold investments and each beneficiary of the trust is an individual who is an accredited investor,
 
shares of that corporation or the beneficiaries’ rights and interest (howsoever described) in that trust shall not be transferable for six months after that corporation or that trust has acquired the shares under Section 275 of the SFA, except:
 
(1) to an institutional investor (for corporations under Section 274 of the SFA) or to a relevant person defined in Section 275(2) of the SFA, or any person pursuant to an offer that is made on terms that such shares of that corporation or such rights and interest in that trust are acquired at a consideration of not less than S$200,000 (or its equivalent in a foreign currency) for each transaction, whether such amount is to be paid for in cash or by exchange of securities or other assets, and further for corporations, in accordance with the conditions, specified in Section 275 of the SFA; (2) where no consideration is given for the transfer; or
 
(3) where the transfer is by operation of law.
 
In addition, investors in Singapore should note that the securities acquired by them are subject to resale and transfer restrictions specified under Section 276 of the SFA, and they, therefore, should seek their own legal advice before effecting any resale or transfer of their securities.
 
Electronic Delivery
 
The underwriters may make prospectuses available in electronic format. A prospectus in electronic format may be made available on the website maintained by any of the underwriters, and underwriters may distribute such prospectuses electronically. The underwriters may agree with us to allocate a limited number of shares for sale to their online brokerage customers. Any such allocation for online distributions will be made by the underwriters on the same basis as other allocations.
 
The underwriters do not expect sales to discretionary accounts to exceed five percent of the total number of shares offered.
 
The addresses of the underwriters are: UBS Securities LLC, 299 Park Ave., New York, New York 10171; RBC Capital Markets, LLC, 200 Vesey Street, 8th Floor, New York, New York 10281; and Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., 60 Wall Street, New York, New York 10005.


S-41


Table of Contents

 
LEGAL MATTERS
 
The validity of the shares of common stock offered by this prospectus supplement and certain other legal matters will be passed upon for us by Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP, Washington D.C. Certain legal matters related to the offering will be passed upon for the underwriters by Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP New York, New York.
 
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
The Consolidated Financial Statements and financial statement schedule as of September 30, 2010 and for the year ended September 30, 2010, included in the accompanying prospectus, have been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report appearing therein.
 
The Consolidated Financial Statements as of September 30, 2009 and for the years ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, and the financial statement schedule for the year ended September 30, 2009, included in the accompanying prospectus, have been audited by Grant Thornton LLP, our former independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report appearing therein.
 
CHANGE IN INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
On February 11, 2010, we dismissed Grant Thornton LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm. During the fiscal years ended September 30, 2008 and 2009 and through February 11, 2010, there were no disagreements between us and Grant Thornton LLP with respect to any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements, if not resolved to the satisfaction of Grant Thornton LLP, would have caused it to make reference to the subject matter of such disagreements in its reports on the financial statements for such years.
 
On February 11, 2010, we engaged PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our new independent registered public accounting firm to audit our Consolidated Financial Statements for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010.
 
AVAILABLE INFORMATION
 
We have filed with the SEC a registration statement on Form N-2, together with all amendments and related exhibits, under the Securities Act, with respect to our shares of common stock offered by this prospectus supplement. The registration statement contains additional information about us and our shares of common stock being offered by this prospectus supplement.
 
We file with or furnish to the SEC annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information meeting the informational requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. You may inspect and copy these reports, proxy statements and other information, as well as the registration statement and related exhibits and schedules, at the Public Reference Room of the SEC at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. You may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information filed electronically by us with the SEC, which are available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. Copies of these reports, proxy and information statements and other information may be obtained, after paying a duplicating fee, by electronic request at the following e-mail address: publicinfo@sec.gov, or by writing the SEC’s Public Reference Section, 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549.


S-42


Table of Contents

 
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
Fifth Street Finance Corp.
 
Consolidated Statements of Assets and Liabilities
 
                 
    March 31, 2011     September 30, 2010  
    (Unaudited)  
 
ASSETS
Investments at fair value:
               
Control investments (cost at March 31, 2011: $11,045,168; cost at September 30, 2010: $12,195,029)
  $ 9,695,327     $ 3,700,000  
Affiliate investments (cost at March 31, 2011: $48,829,558; cost at September 30, 2010: $50,133,521)
    35,747,092       47,222,059  
Non-control/Non-affiliate investments (cost at March 31, 2011: $893,318,481; cost at September 30, 2010: $530,168,045)
    894,306,634       512,899,257  
Total investments at fair value (cost at March 31, 2011: $953,193,207; cost at September 30, 2010: $592,496,595)
    939,749,053       563,821,316  
Cash and cash equivalents
    38,556,212       76,765,254  
Interest and fees receivable
    6,622,820       3,813,757  
Due from portfolio company
    96,424       103,426  
Deferred financing costs
    8,849,335       5,465,964  
Collateral posted to bank and other assets
    1,874,666       1,956,013  
Total Assets
  $ 995,748,510     $ 651,925,730  
Liabilities and Net Assets
               
 
LIABILITIES AND NET ASSETS
Liabilities:
               
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities
  $ 452,770     $ 1,322,282  
Base management fee payable
    4,785,961       2,875,802  
Incentive fee payable
    4,139,032       2,859,139  
Due to FSC, Inc. 
    808,525       1,083,038  
Interest payable
    652,827       282,640  
Payments received in advance from portfolio companies
    861,298       1,330,724  
Loans payable
    134,000,000        
SBA debentures payable
    138,300,000       73,000,000  
Total Liabilities
    284,000,413       82,753,625  
Net Assets:
               
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 150,000,000 shares authorized, 66,667,933 and 54,550,290 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2011 and September 30, 2010
    666,679       545,503  
Additional paid-in-capital
    765,404,953       619,759,984  
Net unrealized depreciation on investments and interest rate swap
    (12,978,443 )     (29,448,713 )
Net realized loss on investments
    (47,054,064 )     (33,090,961 )
Accumulated undistributed net investment income
    5,708,972       11,406,292  
Total Net Assets (equivalent to $10.68 and $10.43 per common share at March 31, 2011 and September 30, 2010) (Note 12)
    711,748,097       569,172,105  
Total Liabilities and Net Assets
  $ 995,748,510     $ 651,925,730  
 
See notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


S-43


Table of Contents

Fifth Street Finance Corp.
 
Consolidated Statements of Operations
 
                                 
    Three Months
    Three Months
    Six Months
    Six Months
 
    Ended March 31,
    Ended March 31,
    Ended March 31,
    Ended March 31,
 
 
  2011     2010     2011     2010  
    (Unaudited)  
 
Interest income:
                               
Control investments
  $ 12,463     $ (41,919 )   $ 13,432     $ 182,827  
Affiliate investments
    1,127,620       2,257,404       2,290,136       4,516,905  
Non-control/Non-affiliate investments
    21,202,939       11,874,938       37,692,123       19,548,264  
Interest on cash and cash equivalents
    4,393       5,521       13,530       201,183  
Total interest income
    22,347,415       14,095,944       40,009,221       24,449,179  
PIK interest income:
                               
Control investments
    101,339             134,672        
Affiliate investments
    275,633       323,533       557,433       655,149  
Non-control/Non-affiliate investments
    3,094,431       1,981,640       5,922,986       3,611,798  
Total PIK interest income
    3,471,403       2,305,173       6,615,091       4,266,947  
Fee income:
                               
Control investments
    28             126,514        
Affiliate investments
    133,407       425,261       266,961       679,038  
Non-control/Non-affiliate investments
    3,740,634       1,018,639       8,007,850       1,680,003  
Total fee income
    3,874,069       1,443,900       8,401,325       2,359,041  
Dividend and other income:
                               
Control investments
                       
Affiliate investments
                       
Non-control/Non-affiliate investments
    8,288       11,333       10,722       22,666  
Total dividend and other income
    8,288       11,333       10,722       22,666  
Total Investment Income
    29,701,175       17,856,350       55,036,359       31,097,833  
Expenses:
                               
Base management fee
    4,785,961       2,336,878       8,564,740       4,603,881  
Incentive fee
    4,139,032       2,801,562       7,652,933       4,888,826  
Professional fees
    507,483       329,014       1,197,972       630,619  
Board of Directors fees
    36,000       43,000       85,500       81,000  
Interest expense
    2,724,188       260,941       4,662,898       352,120  
Administrator expense
    391,175       318,806       745,344       570,624  
General and administrative expenses
    561,209       559,901       1,515,241       1,142,524  
Total expenses
    13,145,048       6,650,102       24,424,628       12,269,594  
Base management fee waived
                      (727,067 )
Net expenses
    13,145,048       6,650,102       24,424,628       11,542,527  
Net Investment Income
    16,556,127       11,206,248       30,611,731       19,555,306  
Unrealized appreciation on interest rate swap
    234,166             970,556        
Unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments:
                               
Control investments
    (757,321 )     486,853       7,313,275       2,480,075  
Affiliate investments
    (8,590,695 )     3,327,908       (10,171,003 )     3,727,842  
Non-control/Non-affiliate investments
    8,741,597       (2,638,050 )     18,357,442       (4,031,912 )
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments
    (606,419 )     1,176,711       15,499,714       2,176,005  
Realized gain (loss) on investments:
                               
Control investments
    (40,586 )           (7,805,705 )      
Affiliate investments
          (2,908,084 )           (2,908,084 )
Non-control/Non-affiliate investments
    (472,298 )           (6,157,398 )     106,000  
Net realized loss on investments
    (512,884 )     (2,908,084 )     (13,963,103 )     (2,802,084 )
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations
  $ 15,670,990     $ 9,474,875     $ 33,118,898     $ 18,929,227  
Net investment income per common share — basic and diluted
  $ 0.27     $ 0.26     $ 0.52     $ 0.48  
Earnings per common share — basic and diluted
  $ 0.25     $ 0.22     $ 0.57     $ 0.47  
Weighted average common shares outstanding — basic and diluted
    62,120,473       43,019,350       58,339,723       40,421,657  
 
See notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


S-44


Table of Contents

Fifth Street Finance Corp.
 
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Net Assets
 
                 
    Six Months Ended
    Six Months Ended
 
    March 31, 2011     March 31, 2010  
    (Unaudited)  
 
Operations:
               
Net investment income
  $ 30,611,731     $ 19,555,306  
Net unrealized appreciation on investments and interest rate swap
    16,470,270       2,176,005  
Net realized loss on investments
    (13,963,103 )     (2,802,084 )
Net increase in net assets from operations
    33,118,898       18,929,227  
Stockholder transactions:
               
Distributions to stockholders
    (36,309,051 )     (23,794,498 )
Net decrease in net assets from stockholder transactions
    (36,309,051 )     (23,794,498 )
Capital share transactions:
               
Issuance of common stock, net
    143,429,688       77,537,266  
Issuance of common stock under dividend reinvestment plan
    2,336,457       1,168,939  
Net increase in net assets from capital share transactions
    145,766,145       78,706,205  
Total increase in net assets
    142,575,992       73,840,934  
Net assets at beginning of period
    569,172,105       410,556,071  
Net assets at end of period
  $ 711,748,097     $ 484,397,005  
Net asset value per common share
  $ 10.68     $ 10.70  
Common shares outstanding at end of period
    66,667,933       45,282,596  
 
See notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


S-45


Table of Contents

Fifth Street Finance Corp.
 
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
 
                 
    Six Months Ended
    Six Months Ended
 
    March 31, 2011     March 31, 2010  
    (Unaudited)  
 
Cash flows from operating activities:
               
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations
  $ 33,118,898     $ 18,929,227  
Adjustments to reconcile net increase in net assets resulting from operations to net cash used by operating activities:
               
Net unrealized appreciation on investments and interest rate swap
    (16,470,270 )     (2,176,005 )
Net realized losses on investments
    13,963,103       2,802,084  
PIK interest income
    (6,615,091 )     (4,266,947 )
Recognition of fee income
    (8,401,325 )     (2,359,041 )
Accretion of original issue discount on investments
    (808,927 )     (448,427 )
Amortization of deferred financing costs
    955,154        
Change in operating assets and liabilities:
               
Fee income received
    14,010,650       6,466,569  
Increase in interest and fees receivable
    (1,826,027 )     (1,781,438 )
Decrease in due from portfolio company
    7,002       78,521  
(Increase) decrease in collateral posted to bank and other assets
    81,347       (1,736,387 )
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities
    101,045       (85,056 )
Increase in base management fee payable
    1,910,159       784,718  
Increase in incentive fee payable
    1,279,893       857,299  
Decrease in due to FSC, Inc. 
    (274,513 )     (152,845 )
Increase in interest payable
    370,187       24,537  
Decrease in payments received in advance from portfolio companies
    (469,426 )     (95,997 )
Purchases of investments and net revolver activity, net of syndications
    (452,660,960 )     (176,666,609 )
Principal payments received on investments (scheduled payments)
    10,186,307       4,182,202  
Principal payments received on investments (payoffs)
    62,204,072       6,385,000  
PIK interest income received in cash
    6,711,111       635,194  
Proceeds from the sale of investments
          4,191,721  
Net cash used by operating activities
    (342,627,611 )     (144,431,680 )
Cash flows from financing activities:
               
Dividends paid in cash
    (33,972,594 )     (22,625,559 )
Borrowings under SBA debentures payable
    65,300,000        
Borrowings under credit facilities
    378,000,000       38,000,000  
Repayments of borrowings under credit facilities
    (244,000,000 )     (38,000,000 )
Deferred financing costs paid
    (4,338,525 )      
Proceeds from the issuance of common stock
    143,921,427       78,086,148  
Offering costs paid
    (491,739 )     (765,602 )
Net cash provided by financing activities
    304,418,569       54,694,987  
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
    (38,209,042 )     (89,736,693 )
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
    76,765,254       113,205,287  
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
  $ 38,556,212     $ 23,468,594  
Supplemental Information:
               
Cash paid for interest
  $ 3,337,557     $ 213,855  
Non-cash financing activities:
               
Issuance of shares of common stock under dividend reinvestment plan
  $ 2,336,457     $ 1,168,939  
 
See notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


S-46


Table of Contents

Fifth Street Finance Corp.
 
Consolidated Schedule of Investments
March 31, 2011
 
                             
Portfolio Company/
                     
Type of Investment(1)(2)(5)
 
Industry
 
Principal(8)
   
Cost
   
Fair Value
 
    (Unaudited)  
 
Control Investments(3)
                           
Lighting By Gregory, LLC(9)(13)(14)
  Housewares &
Specialties
                       
First Lien Term Loan A, 9.75% due 2/28/2013
      $ 4,155,306     $ 3,996,187     $ 4,055,655  
First Lien Bridge Loan, 6% due 3/31/2012
        150,000       150,000        
97.38% membership interest
                1,210,000        
                             
                  5,356,187       4,055,655  
Nicos Polymers & Grinding Inc. 
  Environmental &
facilities services
                       
First Lien Term Loan, 8% due 12/4/2017
        5,134,672       5,061,481       5,139,672  
First Lien Revolver, 8% due 12/4/2017
        500,000       500,000       500,000  
50% Membership Interest in CD Holdco, LLC
                127,500        
                             
                  5,688,981       5,639,672  
                             
Total Control Investments
              $ 11,045,168     $ 9,695,327  
                             
Affiliate Investments(4)
                           
O’Currance, Inc. 
  Data Processing
& Outsourced
Services
                       
First Lien Term Loan A, 16.875% due 3/21/2012
        11,184,988     $ 11,124,844     $ 11,239,858  
First Lien Term Loan B, 16.875%, due 3/21/2012
        1,639,277       1,622,288       1,698,293  
1.75% Preferred Membership interest in O’Currance Holding Co., LLC
                130,413       31,490  
3.3% Membership Interest in O’Currance Holding Co., LLC
                250,000        
                             
                  13,127,545       12,969,641  
MK Network, LLC (13)(14)
  Education
services
                       
First Lien Term Loan A, 13.5% due 6/1/2012
        8,784,277       8,484,972        
First Lien Term Loan B, 17.5% due 6/1/2012
        4,975,819       4,748,004        
First Lien Revolver, Prime + 1.5% (10% floor), due 6/1/2010(10)
                     
11,030 Membership Units
                771,575        
                             
                  14,004,551        


S-47


Table of Contents

                             
Portfolio Company/
                     
Type of Investment(1)(2)(5)
 
Industry
 
Principal(8)
   
Cost
   
Fair Value
 
    (Unaudited)  
 
Caregiver Services, Inc. 
  Healthcare
services
                       
Second Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+6.85% (12% floor) due 2/25/2013
        6,426,488       6,170,953       6,543,222  
Second Lien Term Loan B, 16.5% due 2/25/2013
        14,923,107       14,446,111       14,842,797  
1,080,399 shares of Series A Preferred Stock
                1,080,398       1,391,432  
                             
                  21,697,462       22,777,451  
                             
Total Affiliate Investments
              $ 48,829,558     $ 35,747,092  
                             
Non-Control/Non-Affiliate Investments(7)
                           
CPAC, Inc. 
  Household
Products
                       
Subordinated Term Loan, 12.5% due 6/1/2012
        1,133,269     $ 1,133,269     $ 1,133,269  
                             
                  1,133,269       1,133,269  
Repechage Investments Limited
  Restaurants                        
First Lien Term Loan, 15.5% due 10/16/2011
        3,508,523       3,352,646       3,274,691  
7,500 shares of Series A Preferred Stock of Elephant & Castle, Inc. 
                750,000       63,687  
                             
                  4,102,646       3,338,378  
Traffic Control & Safety Corporation
  Construction and
Engineering
                       
Senior Term Loan A, 7.741% due 6/29/2012
        2,361,779       2,263,371       2,263,371  
Senior Term Loan B, 5.29% due 6/29/2012
        2,846,473       2,727,870       2,727,870  
Senior Term Loan C, 5.29% due 6/29/2012
        4,027,956       3,860,124       3,860,124  
Senior Revolver, 5.29% due 6/29/2012
        5,250,000       5,031,251       5,031,251  
Second Lien Term Loan, 15% due 5/28/2015(9)
        20,376,773       20,157,995       19,325,690  
Subordinated Loan, 15% due 5/28/2015
        4,936,102       4,936,102       3,213,442  
24,750 shares of Series B Preferred Stock
                247,500        
43,494 shares of Series D Preferred Stock(6)
                434,937        
25,000 shares of Common Stock
                2,500        
                             
                  39,661,650       36,421,748  
TBA Global, LLC
  Advertising                        
53,994 Senior Preferred Shares
                215,975       215,975  
191,977 Shares A Shares
                191,977       179,240  
                             
                  407,952       395,215  

S-48


Table of Contents

                             
Portfolio Company/
                     
Type of Investment(1)(2)(5)
 
Industry
 
Principal(8)
   
Cost
   
Fair Value
 
    (Unaudited)  
 
Fitness Edge, LLC
  Leisure
facilities
                       
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+5.25% (10% floor), due 8/8/2012
        1,000,000       997,107       1,006,811  
First Lien Term Loan B, 15% due 8/8/2012
        5,703,099       5,662,270       5,713,995  
1,000 Common Units(6)
                42,908       138,450  
                             
                  6,702,285       6,859,256  
Filet of Chicken(9)
  Food
Distributors
                       
Second Lien Term Loan, 14.5% due 7/31/2012
        7,335,987       7,159,978       7,316,796  
                             
                  7,159,978       7,316,796  
Boot Barn
  Apparel,
accessories &
luxury goods
                       
247.06 shares of Series A Preferred Stock
                247,060       71,394  
1,308 shares of Common Stock
                8,855       8,725  
                             
                  255,915       80,119  
Premier Trailer Leasing, Inc.(9)(13)(14)
  Trucking                        
Second Lien Term Loan, 16.5% due 10/23/2012
        18,758,227       17,063,645       3,897,412  
285 shares of Common Stock
                1,140        
                             
                  17,064,785       3,897,412  
Pacific Press Technologies, Inc.
                           
Second Lien Term Loan, 14.75% due 1/10/2013
  Industrial
machinery
    10,174,134       9,954,793       10,191,421  
33,463 shares of Common Stock
                344,513       715,974  
                             
                  10,299,306       10,907,395  
Rail Acquisition Corp. 
  Electronic
manufacturing
services
                       
First Lien Term Loan, 17% due 9/1/2013
        17,331,049       14,552,152       9,779,405  
First Lien Revolver, 7.85% due 9/1/2013
        5,120,565       5,120,565       5,120,565  
                             
                  19,672,717       14,899,970  
Western Emulsions, Inc. 
  Construction
materials
                       
Second Lien Term Loan, 15% due 6/30/2014
        6,706,609       6,578,609       6,705,597  
                             
                  6,578,609       6,705,597  

S-49


Table of Contents

                             
Portfolio Company/
                     
Type of Investment(1)(2)(5)
 
Industry
 
Principal(8)
   
Cost
   
Fair Value
 
    (Unaudited)  
 
Storyteller Theaters Corporation
  Movies &
entertainment
                       
1,692 shares of Common Stock
                169       61,613  
20,000 shares of Preferred Stock
                200,000       200,000  
                             
                  200,169       261,613  
HealthDrive Corporation(9)
  Healthcare
services
                       
First Lien Term Loan A, 10% due 7/17/2013
        6,462,970       6,186,332       6,498,125  
First Lien Term Loan B, 13% due 7/17/2013
        10,230,293       10,140,293       10,500,432  
First Lien Revolver, 12% due 7/17/2013
        1,000,000       991,000       1,016,374  
                             
                  17,317,625       18,014,931  
idX Corporation
  Distributors                        
Second Lien Term Loan, 14.5% due 7/1/2014
        13,726,772       13,520,365       13,763,520  
                             
                  13,520,365       13,763,520  
Cenegenics, LLC
  Healthcare
services
                       
First Lien Term Loan, 17% due 10/27/2014
        19,616,954       18,808,868       19,638,428  
414,419 Common Units(6)
                598,382       1,269,716  
                             
                  19,407,250       20,908,144  
IZI Medical Products, Inc. 
  Healthcare
technology
                       
First Lien Term Loan A, 12% due 3/31/2014
        4,049,775       4,004,026       4,055,414  
First Lien Term Loan B, 16% due 3/31/2014
        17,259,468       16,783,215       17,263,298  
First Lien Revolver, 10% due 3/31/2014(11)
              (30,000 )      
453,755 Preferred units of IZI Holdings, LLC(6)
                453,755       632,370  
                             
                  21,210,996       21,951,082  
Trans-Trade, Inc. 
  Air freight &
logistics
                       
First Lien Term Loan, 15.5% due 9/10/2014
        12,777,468       12,502,032       12,881,433  
First Lien Revolver, 12% due 9/10/2014
        5,000,000       4,892,667       5,015,544  
                             
                  17,394,699       17,896,977  
Riverlake Equity Partners II, LP
  Multi-sector
holdings
                       
1.89% limited partnership interest
                122,105       122,105  
                             
                  122,105       122,105  

S-50


Table of Contents

                             
Portfolio Company/
                     
Type of Investment(1)(2)(5)
 
Industry
 
Principal(8)
   
Cost
   
Fair Value
 
    (Unaudited)  
 
Riverside Fund IV, LP
  Multi-sector
holdings
                       
0.25% limited partnership interest
                416,478       416,478  
                             
                  416,478       416,478  
ADAPCO, Inc. 
  Fertilizers &
agricultural
chemicals
                       
First Lien Term Loan A, 10% due 12/17/2014
        8,000,000       7,831,887       8,008,672  
First Lien Term Loan B, 14% due 12/17/2014
        14,370,059       14,077,157       14,356,636  
First Lien Term Revolver, 10% due 12/17/2014
        4,750,000       4,540,784       4,782,888  
                             
                  26,449,828       27,148,196  
Ambath/Rebath Holdings, Inc. 
  Home
improvement
retail
                       
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+7% (10% floor) due 12/30/2014
        4,000,000       4,000,000       4,023,879  
First Lien Term Loan B, 15% due 12/30/2014
        22,708,636       22,708,636       22,695,582  
First Lien Term Revolver, LIBOR+6.5% (9.5% floor) due 12/30/2014(10)
        1,500,000       1,500,000       1,498,917  
                             
                  28,208,636       28,218,378  
JTC Education, Inc. 
  Education
services
                       
First Lien Term Loan, LIBOR+9.5% (12.5% floor) due 12/31/2014
        28,664,063       27,943,969       28,697,559  
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+9.5% (12.75% floor) due 12/31/2014
        1,250,000       896,667       1,324,494  
                             
                  28,840,636       30,022,053  
Tegra Medical, LLC
  Healthcare
equipment
                       
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+7% (10% floor) due 12/31/2014
        24,640,000       24,272,161       24,723,072  
First Lien Term Loan B, 14% due 12/31/2014
        22,323,354       21,997,682       22,333,892  
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+7% (10% floor) due 12/31/2014
        1,500,000       1,441,333       1,507,608  
                             
                  47,711,176       48,564,572  
Flatout, Inc. 
  Food retail                        
First Lien Term Loan A, 10% due 12/31/2014
        6,800,000       6,654,706       6,807,073  
First Lien Term Loan B, 15% due 12/31/2014
        12,927,154       12,643,019       12,937,783  
First Lien Revolver, 10% due 12/31/2014(11)
              (33,559 )      
                             
                  19,264,166       19,744,856  

S-51


Table of Contents

                             
Portfolio Company/
                     
Type of Investment(1)(2)(5)
 
Industry
 
Principal(8)
   
Cost
   
Fair Value
 
    (Unaudited)  
 
Psilos Group Partners IV, LP
  Multi-sector
holdings
                       
2.52% limited partnership interest(12)
                       
                             
Mansell Group, Inc. 
  Advertising                        
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+7% (10% floor) due 4/30/2015
        9,875,000       9,705,286       9,868,451  
First Lien Term Loan B, LIBOR+9% (12% floor) due 4/30/2015
        8,076,228       7,936,932       8,084,702  
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+6% (9% floor) due 4/30/2015(11)
        1,000,000       967,333       1,005,963  
                             
                  18,609,551       18,959,116  
NDSSI Holdings, Inc. 
  Electronic
equipment &
instruments
                       
First Lien Term Loan, LIBOR+9.75% (12.75% floor) due 4/30/2015
        30,017,061       29,519,554       30,061,843  
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+7% (10% floor) due 4/30/2015
        3,500,000       3,421,154       3,502,086  
                             
                  32,940,708       33,563,929  
Eagle Hospital Physicians, Inc. 
  Healthcare
services
                       
First Lien Term Loan, LIBOR+8.75% (11.75% floor) due 8/11/2015
        7,850,000       7,669,829       7,868,400  
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+5.75% (8.75% floor) due 8/11/2015(11)
              (55,758 )      
                             
                  7,614,071       7,868,400  
Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC
  Diversified
support
services
                       
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+7% (9% floor) due 8/13/2015
        15,250,000       14,978,636       15,287,877  
First Lien Term Loan B, LIBOR+10% (13% floor) due 8/13/2015
        11,070,781       10,872,060       11,067,261  
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+7% (9% floor) due 8/13/2015
        1,000,000       927,738       1,083,965  
                             
                  26,778,434       27,439,103  
Epic Acquisition, Inc. 
  Healthcare
services
                       
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+8% (11% floor) due 8/13/2015
        9,297,500       9,094,984       9,275,558  
First Lien Term Loan B, 15.25% due 8/13/2015
        17,159,953       16,780,515       17,186,836  
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+6.5% (9.5% floor) due 8/13/2015
        600,000       533,454       621,878  
                             
                  26,408,953       27,084,272  

S-52


Table of Contents

                             
Portfolio Company/
                     
Type of Investment(1)(2)(5)
 
Industry
 
Principal(8)
   
Cost
   
Fair Value
 
    (Unaudited)  
 
Specialty Bakers LLC
  Food
distributors
                       
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+8.5% due 9/15/2015
        8,775,000       8,565,857       8,782,067  
First Lien Term Loan B, LIBOR+11% (13.5% floor) due 9/15/2015
        11,000,000       10,743,058       11,040,725  
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+8.5% due 9/15/2015(11)
              (93,433 )      
                             
                  19,215,482       19,822,792  
CRGT, Inc. 
  IT consulting &
other services
                       
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+7.5% due 10/1/2015
        29,000,000       28,500,168       29,068,105  
First Lien Term Loan B, 12.5% due 10/1/2015
        22,000,000       21,604,000       22,040,291  
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+7.5% due 10/1/2015(11)
              (225,000 )      
                             
                  49,879,168       51,108,396  
Welocalize, Inc. 
  Internet
software &
services
                       
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+8% (10% floor) due 11/19/2015
        16,400,000       16,095,901       16,400,313  
First Lien Term Loan, LIBOR+9% (12.25% floor) due 11/19/2015
        21,096,423       20,711,423       21,075,236  
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+7% (9% floor) due 11/19/2015
        2,250,000       2,140,000       2,274,860  
2,086,163 Common Units in RPWL Holdings, LLC
                2,086,163       2,112,041  
                             
                  41,033,487       41,862,450  
Miche Bag, LLC
  Apparel,
accessories &
luxury goods
                       
First Lien Term Loan B, LIBOR+9% (12% floor) due 12/7/2013
        15,000,000       14,659,710       15,042,504  
First Lien Term Loan, LIBOR+10% (16% floor) due 12/7/2015
        17,162,074       14,426,785       17,126,857  
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+7% (10% floor) due 12/7/2015(11)
              (118,222 )      
10,371 Preferred Equity units in Miche Holdings, LLC(6)
                1,037,112       954,366  
146,289 Series D Common Equity units in Miche Holdings, LLC(6)
                1,462,888       1,346,170  
                             
                  31,468,273       34,469,897  
Bunker Hill Capital II (QP), L.P. 
  Multi-sector
holdings
                       
0.50% limited partnership interest(12)
                       
                             

S-53


Table of Contents

                             
Portfolio Company/
                     
Type of Investment(1)(2)(5)
 
Industry
 
Principal(8)
   
Cost
   
Fair Value
 
    (Unaudited)  
 
Dominion Diagnostics, LLC
  Healthcare
services
                       
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+7% (9% floor) due 12/17/2015
        30,350,000       29,769,524       30,394,983  
First Lien Term Loan, LIBOR+9% (12.5% floor) due 12/17/2015
        20,058,396       19,685,062       20,161,592  
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+6.5% (9% floor) due 12/17/2015(11)
              (93,333 )      
                             
                  49,361,253       50,556,575  
Advanced Pain Management
  Healthcare
services
                       
First Lien Term Loan, LIBOR+5% (6.75% floor) due 12/22/2015
        8,148,750       8,012,134       8,163,952  
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+5% (6.75% floor) due 12/22/2015(11)
              (5,600 )      
                             
                  8,006,534       8,163,952  
DISA, Inc. 
  Human
resources &
employment
services
                       
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+7.5% (8.25% floor) due 12/30/2015
        13,000,000       12,750,198       13,084,515  
First Lien Term Loan B, LIBOR+11.5% (12.5% floor) due 12/30/2015
        8,331,511       8,173,515       8,311,374  
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+6% (7% floor) due 12/30/2015(11)
              (76,142 )      
                             
                  20,847,571       21,395,889  
Saddleback Fence and Vinyl Products, Inc. 
  Building
products
                       
First Lien Term Loan, 8% due 11/30/2013
        772,768       772,768       772,768  
First Lien Revolver, 8% due 11/30/2011
                     
                             
                  772,768       772,768  
Best Vinyl Fence & Deck, LLC
  Building
Products
                       
First Lien Term Loan A, 8% due 11/30/2013
        2,060,713       1,946,983       2,060,713  
First Lien Term Loan B, 8% due 5/31/2011
        3,863,838       3,863,838       3,863,838  
First Lien Revolver, 8% due 11/30/2011
                     
25,641 Shares of Series A Preferred Stock in Vanguard Vinyl, Inc. 
                       
25,641 Shares of Common Stock in Vanguard Vinyl, Inc. 
                       
                             
                  5,810,821       5,924,551  

S-54


Table of Contents

                             
Portfolio Company/
                     
Type of Investment(1)(2)(5)
 
Industry
 
Principal(8)
   
Cost
   
Fair Value
 
    (Unaudited)  
 
Physicians Pharmacy Alliance, Inc. 
  Healthcare
services
                       
First Lien Term Loan, LIBOR+10.5% due 1/4/2016
        17,060,989       16,697,763       17,060,989  
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+6% due 1/4/2016(11)
              (42,500 )      
                             
                  16,655,263       17,060,989  
Cardon Healthcare Network, LLC
  Diversified
support
services
                       
First Lien Term Loan, LIBOR+10% (11.75% floor) due 1/6/2016
        11,850,000       11,605,493       11,850,000  
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+6.5% (8.25% floor) due 1/6/2016(11)
              (41,214 )      
                             
                  11,564,279       11,850,000  
U.S. Retirement Partners, Inc. 
  Diversified
financial
services
                       
First Lien Term Loan, LIBOR+9.5% (11.5% floor) due 1/6/2016
        11,700,000       11,361,007       11,700,000  
                             
                  11,361,007       11,700,000  
IOS Acquisitions, Inc. 
  Oil & gas
equipment &
services
                       
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+8% (10% floor) due 1/14/2016
        5,300,000       5,178,937       5,300,000  
First Lien Term Loan B, LIBOR+12% (14% floor) due 1/14/2016
        6,025,702       5,885,311       6,025,702  
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+8% (10% floor) due 1/14/2016(11)
              (46,797 )      
                             
                  11,017,451       11,325,702  
Actient Pharmaceuticals LLC
  Healthcare
services
                       
First Lien Term Loan, LIBOR+6.25% (8.25% floor) due 7/29/2015
        9,754,098       9,564,490       9,754,098  
                             
                  9,564,490       9,754,098  
Phoenix Brands Merger Sub LLC
  Household
products
                       
Senior Term Loan, LIBOR+5% (6.5% floor) due 1/13/2016
        8,571,429       8,386,251       8,571,429  
Subordinated Term Loan, LIBOR+13.875% due 2/1/2017
        20,000,000       19,611,111       20,000,000  
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+5% (6.5% floor) due 1/31/2016
        4,285,714       4,145,893       4,285,714  
                             
                  32,143,255       32,857,143  

S-55


Table of Contents

                             
Portfolio Company/
                     
Type of Investment(1)(2)(5)
 
Industry
 
Principal(8)
   
Cost
   
Fair Value
 
    (Unaudited)  
 
U.S. Collections, Inc. 
  Diversified
support services
                       
First Lien Term Loan, LIBOR+5.25% (7% floor) due 3/31/2016
        11,358,793       11,136,614       11,358,793  
                             
                  11,136,614       11,358,793  
CCCG, LLC
  Oil & gas
equipment &
services
                       
First Lien Term Loan, LIBOR+9% (10.75% floor) due 7/29/2015
        34,938,750       34,248,422       34,938,750  
                             
                  34,248,422       34,938,750  
Maverick Healthcare Group, LLC
  Healthcare
equipment
                       
First Lien Term Loan, LIBOR+9% (10.75% floor) due 12/31/2016
        24,937,500       24,379,539       24,937,500  
                             
                  24,379,539       24,937,500  
Refac Optical Group
  Specialty
stores
                       
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+7.5% due 3/23/2016
        19,510,000       19,040,081       19,510,000  
First Lien Term Loan B, LIBOR+10.25% due 3/23/2016
        20,033,509       19,546,656       20,033,509  
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+7.5% due 3/23/2016(11)
              (188,891 )      
1,000 Shares of Common Stock in Refac Holdings, Inc. 
                1,000       1,000  
1,000 Shares of Preferred Stock in Refac Holdings, Inc. 
                999,000       999,000  
                             
                  39,397,846       40,543,509  
Total Non-Control/Non-Affiliate Investments
              $ 893,318,481     $ 894,306,634  
                             
Total Portfolio Investments
              $ 953,193,207     $ 939,749,053  
                             
 
 
(1) All debt investments are income producing unless otherwise noted in (13) or (14) below. Interest rates and floors may contain fixed rate PIK provisions. Equity is non-income producing unless otherwise noted.
 
(2) See Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for portfolio composition by geographic region.
 
(3) Control Investments are defined by the Investment Company Act of 1940 (“1940 Act”) as investments in companies in which the Company owns more than 25% of the voting securities or maintains greater than 50% of the board representation.
 
(4) Affiliate Investments are defined by the 1940 Act as investments in companies in which the Company owns between 5% and 25% of the voting securities.
 
(5) Equity ownership may be held in shares or units of companies related to the portfolio companies.
 
(6) Income producing through payment of dividends or distributions.
 
(7) Non-Control/Non-Affiliate Investments are defined by the 1940 Act as investments that are neither Control Investments nor Affiliate Investments.

S-56


Table of Contents

 
(8) Principal includes accumulated PIK interest and is net of repayments.
 
(9) Interest rates have been adjusted on certain term loans and revolvers. These rate adjustments are temporary in nature due to financial or payment covenant violations in the original credit agreements, or permanent in nature per loan amendment or waiver documents. The table below summarizes these rate adjustments by portfolio company:
 
                 
Portfolio Company
  Effective Date   Cash Interest   PIK Interest   Reason
 
Lighting by Gregory, LLC
  March 11, 2011   −2.0% on Bridge Loan       Per loan amendment
Traffic Control & Safety Corp. 
  May 28, 2010   −4.0% on Second Lien Term Loan   + 1.0% on Second Lien Term Loan   Per restructuring agreement
Filet of Chicken
  October 1, 2010   + 1.0% on Term Loan   + 1.0% on
Term Loan
  Tier pricing per waiver agreement
Premier Trailer Leasing, Inc. 
  August 4, 2009   + 4.0% on Term Loan       Default interest per credit agreement
HealthDrive Corporation
  April 30, 2009   + 2.0% on Term Loan A       Per waiver agreement
 
(10) Revolving credit line has been suspended and is deemed unlikely to be renewed in the future.
 
(11) Cost amounts represent unearned income related to undrawn commitments.
 
(12) Represents an unfunded commitment to fund a limited partnership interest.
 
(13) Investment was on cash non-accrual status as of March 31, 2011.
 
(14) Investment was on PIK non-accrual status as of March 31, 2011.
 
See notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


S-57


Table of Contents

Fifth Street Finance Corp.
 
Consolidated Schedule of Investments
September 30, 2010
 
                             
Portfolio Company/Type
                     
of Investment(1)(2)(5)
 
Industry
 
Principal(8)
   
Cost
   
Fair Value
 
 
Control Investments(3)
                           
Lighting By Gregory, LLC(13)(14)
  Housewares &
Specialties
                       
First Lien Term Loan A, 9.75% due 2/28/2013
      $ 5,419,495     $ 4,728,589     $ 1,503,716  
First Lien Term Loan B, 14.5% due 2/28/2013
        8,575,783       6,906,440       2,196,284  
First Lien Bridge Loan, 8% due 10/15/2010
        152,312       150,000        
97.38% membership interest
                410,000        
                             
                  12,195,029       3,700,000  
                             
Total Control Investments
              $ 12,195,029     $ 3,700,000  
                             
Affiliate Investments(4)
                           
O’Currance, Inc. 
  Data Processing &
Outsourced Services
                       
First Lien Term Loan A, 16.875% due 3/21/2012
        10,961,448     $ 10,869,262     $ 10,805,775  
First Lien Term Loan B, 16.875%, due 3/21/2012
        1,853,976       1,828,494       1,896,645  
1.75% Preferred Membership interest in O’Currance Holding Co., LLC
                130,413       38,592  
3.3% Membership Interest in O’Currance Holding Co., LLC
                250,000        
                             
                  13,078,169       12,741,012  
MK Network, LLC(13)(14)
  Education
services
                       
First Lien Term Loan A, 13.5% due 6/1/2012
        9,740,358       9,539,188       7,913,140  
First Lien Term Loan B, 17.5% due 6/1/2012
        4,926,187       4,748,004       3,938,660  
First Lien Revolver, Prime + 1.5% (10% floor), due 6/1/2010(10)
                     
11,030 Membership Units(6)
                771,575        
                             
                  15,058,767       11,851,800  
Caregiver Services, Inc. 
  Healthcare
services
                       
Second Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+6.85% (12% floor) due 2/25/2013
        7,141,190       6,813,431       7,113,622  
Second Lien Term Loan B, 16.5% due 2/25/2013
        14,692,015       14,102,756       14,179,626  
1,080,399 shares of Series A Preferred Stock
                1,080,398       1,335,999  
                             
                  21,996,585       22,629,247  
                             
Total Affiliate Investments
              $ 50,133,521     $ 47,222,059  
                             
Non-Control/Non-Affiliate Investments(7)
                           
CPAC, Inc. 
  Household
Products
                       
Subordinated Term Loan, 12.5% due 6/1/2012
        1,064,910     $ 1,064,910     $ 1,064,910  
                             
                  1,064,910       1,064,910  


S-58


Table of Contents

                             
Portfolio Company/Type
                     
of Investment(1)(2)(5)
 
Industry
 
Principal(8)
   
Cost
   
Fair Value
 
 
Vanguard Vinyl, Inc.(9)(13)(14)
  Building
Products
                       
First Lien Term Loan, 12% due 3/30/2013
        7,000,000       6,827,373       5,812,199  
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+7% (10% floor) due 3/30/2013
        1,250,000       1,207,895       1,029,268  
25,641 Shares of Series A Preferred Stock
                253,846        
25,641 Shares of Common Stock
                2,564        
                             
                  8,291,678       6,841,467  
Repechage Investments Limited
  Restaurants                        
First Lien Term Loan, 15.5% due 10/16/2011
        3,708,971       3,475,906       3,486,342  
7,500 shares of Series A Preferred Stock of Elephant & Castle, Inc. 
                750,000       354,114  
                             
                  4,225,906       3,840,456  
Traffic Control & Safety Corporation(9)
  Construction and
Engineering
                       
Second Lien Term Loan, 15% due 5/28/2015
        19,969,524       19,724,493       19,440,090  
Subordinated Loan, 15% due 5/28/2015
        4,577,800       4,577,800       4,404,746  
24,750 shares of Series B Preferred Stock
                247,500        
43,494 shares of Series D Preferred Stock(6)
                434,937        
25,000 shares of Common Stock
                2,500        
                             
                  24,987,230       23,844,836  
Nicos Polymers & Grinding Inc.(9)(13)(14)
  Environmental &
facilities services
                       
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+5% (10% floor), due 7/17/2012
        3,154,876       3,040,465       1,782,181  
First Lien Term Loan B, 13.5% due 7/17/2012
        6,180,185       5,713,125       3,347,672  
3.32% Interest in Crownbrook Acquisition I LLC
                168,086        
                             
                  8,921,676       5,129,853  
TBA Global, LLC(9)
  Advertising                        
Second Lien Term Loan B, 14.5% due 8/3/2012
        10,840,081       10,594,939       10,625,867  
53,994 Senior Preferred Shares
                215,975       215,975  
191,977 Shares A Shares
                191,977       179,240  
                             
                  11,002,891       11,021,082  
Fitness Edge, LLC
  Leisure
Facilities
                       
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+5.25% (10% floor), due 8/8/2012
        1,250,000       1,245,136       1,247,418  
First Lien Term Loan B, 15% due 8/8/2012
        5,631,547       5,575,477       5,674,493  
1,000 Common Units(6)
                42,908       118,132  
                             
                  6,863,521       7,040,043  
Filet of Chicken(9)
  Food
Distributors
                       
Second Lien Term Loan, 14.5% due 7/31/2012
        9,316,518       9,063,155       8,964,766  
                             
                  9,063,155       8,964,766  

S-59


Table of Contents

                             
Portfolio Company/Type
                     
of Investment(1)(2)(5)
 
Industry
 
Principal(8)
   
Cost
   
Fair Value
 
 
Boot Barn(9)
  Apparel,
accessories &
luxury goods
                       
Second Lien Term Loan, 14.5% due 10/3/2013
        23,545,479       23,288,566       23,477,539  
247.06 shares of Series A Preferred Stock
                247,060       71,394  
1,308 shares of Common Stock
                131        
                             
                  23,535,757       23,548,933  
Premier Trailer Leasing, Inc.(9)(13)(14)
  Trucking                        
Second Lien Term Loan, 16.5% due 10/23/2012
        18,452,952       17,063,645       4,597,412  
285 shares of Common Stock
                1,140        
                             
                  17,064,785       4,597,412  
Pacific Press Technologies, Inc.(9)
                           
Second Lien Term Loan, 14.75% due 7/10/2013
  Industrial
machinery
    10,071,866       9,798,901       9,829,869  
33,786 shares of Common Stock
                344,513       402,894  
                             
                  10,143,414       10,232,763  
Goldco, LLC
                           
Second Lien Term Loan, 17.5% due 1/31/2013
  Restaurants     8,355,688       8,259,479       8,259,479  
                             
                  8,259,479       8,259,479  
Rail Acquisition Corp.(9)
  Electronic
manufacturing
services
                       
First Lien Term Loan, 17% due 9/1/2013
        16,315,866       13,536,969       12,854,425  
First Lien Revolver, 7.85% due 9/1/2013
        5,201,103       5,201,103       5,201,103  
                             
                  18,738,072       18,055,528  
Western Emulsions, Inc.(9)
  Construction
materials
                       
Second Lien Term Loan, 15% due 6/30/2014
        17,864,713       17,475,899       17,039,751  
                             
                  17,475,899       17,039,751  
Storyteller Theaters Corporation
  Movies &
entertainment
                       
1,692 shares of Common Stock
                169       61,613  
20,000 shares of Preferred Stock
                200,000       200,000  
                             
                  200,169       261,613  
HealthDrive Corporation(9)
  Healthcare
services
                       
First Lien Term Loan A, 10% due 7/17/2013
        6,662,970       6,324,339       6,488,990  
First Lien Term Loan B, 13% due 7/17/2013
        10,178,726       10,068,726       9,962,414  
First Lien Revolver, 12% due 7/17/2013
        500,000       489,000       508,967  
                             
                  16,882,065       16,960,371  
idX Corporation
  Distributors                        
Second Lien Term Loan, 14.5% due 7/1/2014
        13,588,794       13,350,633       13,258,317  
                             
                  13,350,633       13,258,317  

S-60


Table of Contents

                             
Portfolio Company/Type
                     
of Investment(1)(2)(5)
 
Industry
 
Principal(8)
   
Cost
   
Fair Value
 
 
Cenegenics, LLC
  Healthcare
services
                       
First Lien Term Loan, 17% due 10/27/2014
        20,172,004       19,257,215       19,544,864  
414,419 Common Units(6)
                598,382       1,417,886  
                             
                  19,855,597       20,962,750  
IZI Medical Products, Inc. 
  Healthcare
technology
                       
First Lien Term Loan A, 12% due 3/31/2014
        4,449,775       4,387,947       4,406,684  
First Lien Term Loan B, 16% due 3/31/2014
        17,258,033       16,702,405       17,092,868  
First Lien Revolver, 10% due 3/31/2014(11)
              (35,000 )     (35,000 )
453,755 Preferred units of IZI Holdings, LLC(6)
                453,755       676,061  
                             
                  21,509,107       22,140,613  
Trans-Trade, Inc. 
  Air freight &
logistics
                       
First Lien Term Loan, 15.5% due 9/10/2014
        12,751,463       12,536,099       12,549,159  
First Lien Revolver, 12% due 9/10/2014
        1,500,000       1,468,667       1,491,373  
                             
                  14,004,766       14,040,532  
Riverlake Equity Partners II, LP
  Multi-sector
holdings
                       
1.87% limited partnership interest
                33,640       33,640  
                             
                  33,640       33,640  
Riverside Fund IV, LP
  Multi-sector
holdings
                       
0.33% limited partnership interest
                135,825       135,825  
                             
                  135,825       135,825  
ADAPCO, Inc. 
  Fertilizers &
agricultural
chemicals
                       
First Lien Term Loan A, 10% due 12/17/2014
        9,000,000       8,789,498       8,806,763  
First Lien Term Loan B, 14% due 12/17/2014
        14,225,615       13,892,772       13,897,677  
First Lien Term Revolver, 10% due 12/17/2014
        4,250,000       4,012,255       4,107,420  
                             
                  26,694,525       26,811,860  
Ambath/Rebath Holdings, Inc. 
  Home
improvement
retail
                       
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+7% (10% floor) due 12/30/2014
        9,500,000       9,277,900       9,127,886  
First Lien Term Loan B, 15% due 12/30/2014
        22,423,729       21,920,479       21,913,276  
First Lien Term Revolver, LIBOR+6.5% (9.5% floor) due 12/30/2014
        1,500,000       1,432,500       1,442,696  
                             
                  32,630,879       32,483,858  
JTC Education, Inc. 
  Education
services
                       
First Lien Term Loan, LIBOR+9.5% (12.5% floor) due 12/31/2014
        31,054,688       30,243,946       30,660,049  
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+9.5% (12.75% floor) due 12/31/2014(11)
              (401,111 )     (401,111 )
                             
                  29,842,835       30,258,938  

S-61


Table of Contents

                             
Portfolio Company/Type
                     
of Investment(1)(2)(5)
 
Industry
 
Principal(8)
   
Cost
   
Fair Value
 
 
Tegra Medical, LLC
  Healthcare
equipment
                       
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+7% (10% floor) due 12/31/2014
        26,320,000       25,877,206       26,250,475  
First Lien Term Loan B, 14% due 12/31/2014
        22,098,966       21,729,057       22,114,113  
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+7% (10% floor) due 12/31/2014(11)
              (66,667 )     (66,667 )
                             
                  47,539,596       48,297,921  
Flatout, Inc. 
  Food retail                        
First Lien Term Loan A, 10% due 12/31/2014
        7,300,000       7,120,671       7,144,136  
First Lien Term Loan B, 15% due 12/31/2014
        12,862,760       12,539,879       12,644,316  
First Lien Revolver, 10% due 12/31/2014(11)
              (38,136 )     (38,136 )
                             
                  19,622,414       19,750,316  
Psilos Group Partners IV, LP
  Multi-sector
holdings
                       
2.53% limited partnership interest(12)
                       
                             
                         
                             
Mansell Group, Inc. 
  Advertising                        
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+7% (10% floor) due 4/30/2015
        5,000,000       4,909,720       4,915,885  
First Lien Term Loan B, LIBOR+9% (13.5% floor) due 4/30/2015
        4,025,733       3,952,399       3,946,765  
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+6% (9% floor) due 4/30/2015(11)
              (36,667 )     (36,667 )
                             
                  8,825,452       8,825,983  
NDSSI Holdings, Inc. 
  Electronic
equipment &
instruments
                       
First Lien Term Loan, LIBOR+9.75% (13.75% floor) due 9/10/2014
        30,245,558       29,684,880       29,409,043  
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+7% (10% floor) due 9/10/2014
        3,500,000       3,409,615       3,478,724  
                             
                  33,094,495       32,887,767  
Eagle Hospital Physicians, Inc. 
  Healthcare
services
                       
First Lien Term Loan, LIBOR+8.75% (11.75% floor) due 8/11/2015
        8,000,000       7,783,892       7,783,892  
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+5.75% (8.75% floor) due 8/11/2015
              (64,394 )     (64,394 )
                             
                  7,719,498       7,719,498  
Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC
  Diversified
support
services
                       
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+7% (9% floor) due 8/13/2015
        15,500,000       15,171,867       15,171,867  
First Lien Term Loan B, LIBOR+10% (13% floor) due 8/13/2015
        11,014,977       10,782,174       10,782,174  
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+7% (9% floor) due 8/13/2015
        376,852       292,196       292,196  
                             

S-62


Table of Contents

                             
Portfolio Company/Type
                     
of Investment(1)(2)(5)
 
Industry
 
Principal(8)
   
Cost
   
Fair Value
 
 
                  26,246,237       26,246,237  
Epic Acquisition, Inc. 
  Healthcare
services
                       
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+8% (11% floor) due 8/13/2015
        7,750,000       7,554,728       7,554,728  
First Lien Term Loan B, 15.25% due 8/13/2015
        13,555,178       13,211,532       13,211,532  
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+6.5% (9.5% floor) due 8/13/2015
        300,000       223,634       223,634  
                             
                  20,989,894       20,989,894  
Specialty Bakers LLC
  Food
distributors
                       
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+8.5% due 9/15/2015
        9,000,000       8,755,670       8,755,670  
First Lien Term Loan B, LIBOR+11% (13.5% floor) due 9/15/2015
        11,000,000       10,704,008       10,704,008  
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+8.5% due 9/15/2015
        2,000,000       1,892,367       1,892,367  
                             
                  21,352,045       21,352,045  
                             
Total Non-Control/Non-Affiliate Investments
              $ 530,168,045     $ 512,899,257  
                             
Total Portfolio Investments
              $ 592,496,595     $ 563,821,316  
                             
 
 
(1) All debt investments are income producing unless otherwise noted in (13) or (14) below. Interest rates and floors may contain fixed rate PIK provisions. Equity is non-income producing unless otherwise noted.
 
(2) See Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for portfolio composition by geographic region.
 
(3) Control Investments are defined by the Investment Company Act of 1940 (“1940 Act”) as investments in companies in which the Company owns more than 25% of the voting securities or maintains greater than 50% of the board representation.
 
(4) Affiliate Investments are defined by the 1940 Act as investments in companies in which the Company owns between 5% and 25% of the voting securities.
 
(5) Equity ownership may be held in shares or units of companies related to the portfolio companies.
 
(6) Income producing through payment of dividends or distributions.
 
(7) Non-Control/Non-Affiliate Investments are defined by the 1940 Act as investments that are neither Control Investments nor Affiliate Investments.
 
(8) Principal includes accumulated PIK interest and is net of repayments.

S-63


Table of Contents

 
(9) Interest rates have been adjusted on certain term loans and revolvers. These rate adjustments are temporary in nature due to financial or payment covenant violations in the original credit agreements, or permanent in nature per loan amendment or waiver documents. The table below summarizes these rate adjustments by portfolio company:
 
                 
Portfolio Company
  Effective Date   Cash Interest   PIK Interest   Reason
 
Nicos Polymers & Grinding, Inc. 
  February 10, 2008       + 2.0% on Term Loan A & B   Per waiver agreement
TBA Global, LLC
  February 15, 2008       + 2.0% on Term Loan B   Per waiver agreement
Vanguard Vinyl, Inc. 
  April 1, 2008   + 0.5% on Term Loan       Per loan amendment
Filet of Chicken
  January 1, 2009   + 1.0% on Term Loan       Tier pricing per waiver agreement
Boot Barn
  January 1, 2009   + 1.0% on Term Loan   + 2.5% on Term Loan   Tier pricing per waiver agreement
HealthDrive Corporation
  April 30, 2009   + 2.0% on Term Loan A       Per waiver agreement
Premier Trailer Leasing, Inc. 
  August 4, 2009   + 4.0% on Term Loan       Default interest per credit agreement
Rail Acquisition Corp. 
  May 1, 2010   −4.5% on Term Loan   −0.5% on Term Loan   Per restructuring agreement
Traffic Control & Safety Corp. 
  May 28, 2010   −4.0% on Term Loan   + 1.0% on Term Loan   Per restructuring agreement
Pacific Press Technologies, Inc. 
  July 1, 2010   −2.0% on Term Loan   −0.75% on Term Loan   Per waiver agreement
Western Emulsions, Inc. 
  September 30, 2010       + 3.0% on Term Loan   Per loan agreement
 
(10) Revolving credit line has been suspended and is deemed unlikely to be renewed in the future.
 
(11) Amounts represent unearned income related to undrawn commitments.
 
(12) Represents an unfunded commitment to fund a limited partnership interest.
 
(13) Investment was on cash non-accrual status as of September 30, 2010.
 
(14) Investment was on PIK non-accrual status as of September 30, 2010.


S-64


Table of Contents

FIFTH STREET FINANCE CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
Note 1.   Organization
 
Fifth Street Mezzanine Partners III, L.P. (the “Partnership”), a Delaware limited partnership, was organized on February 15, 2007 to primarily invest in debt securities of small and middle market companies. FSMPIII GP, LLC was the Partnership’s general partner (the “General Partner”). The Partnership’s investments were managed by Fifth Street Management LLC (the “Investment Adviser”). The General Partner and Investment Adviser were under common ownership.
 
Effective January 2, 2008, the Partnership merged with and into Fifth Street Finance Corp. (the “Company”), an externally managed, closed-end, non-diversified management investment company that has elected to be treated as a business development company under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “1940 Act”). Fifth Street Finance Corp. is managed by the Investment Adviser. Prior to January 2, 2008, references to the Company are to the Partnership. Since January 2, 2008, references to the “Company,” “FSC,” “we” or “our” are to Fifth Street Finance Corp., unless the context otherwise requires.
 
The Company also has certain wholly-owned subsidiaries, including subsidiaries that are not consolidated for income tax purposes, which hold certain portfolio investments of the Company. The subsidiaries are consolidated with the Company for accounting purposes, and the portfolio investments held by the subsidiaries are included in the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.
 
The Company’s shares are listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “FSC.” The following table reflects common stock offerings that have occurred since inception:
 
                         
            Offering
   
Date
 
Transaction
  Shares   Price   Gross Proceeds
 
June 17, 2008
  Initial public offering     10,000,000     $ 14.12     $141.2 million
July 21, 2009
  Follow-on public offering (including underwriters’ exercise of over-allotment option)     9,487,500     $ 9.25     $87.8 million
September 25, 2009
  Follow-on public offering (including underwriters’ exercise of over-allotment option)     5,520,000     $ 10.50     $58.0 million
January 27, 2010
  Follow-on public offering     7,000,000     $ 11.20     $78.4 million
February 25, 2010
  Underwriters’ exercise of over-allotment option     300,500     $ 11.20     $3.4 million
June 21, 2010
  Follow-on public offering (including underwriters’exercise of over-allotment option)     9,200,000     $ 11.50     $105.8 million
December 2010
  At-the-Market offering     429,110     $ 11.87 (1)   $5.1 million
February 4, 2011
  Follow-on public offering (including underwriters’ exercise of over-allotment option)     11,500,000     $ 12.65     $145.5 million
 
 
(1) Average offering price
 
On February 3, 2010, the Company’s consolidated wholly-owned subsidiary, Fifth Street Mezzanine Partners IV, L.P., received a license, effective February 1, 2010, from the United States Small Business Administration, or SBA, to operate as a small business investment company, or SBIC, under Section 301(c) of the Small Business Investment Act of 1958. SBICs are designated to stimulate the flow of private equity capital to eligible small businesses. Under SBA regulations, SBICs may make loans to eligible small businesses and invest in the equity securities of small businesses.
 
The SBIC license allows the Company’s SBIC subsidiary to obtain leverage by issuing SBA-guaranteed debentures, subject to the issuance of a capital commitment by the SBA and other customary procedures. SBA-guaranteed debentures are non-recourse, interest-only debentures with interest payable semi-annually and have a ten year maturity. The principal amount of SBA-guaranteed debentures is not required to be paid prior


S-65


Table of Contents

FIFTH STREET FINANCE CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
to maturity but may be prepaid at any time without penalty. The interest rate of SBA-guaranteed debentures is fixed on a semi-annual basis at a market-driven spread over U.S. Treasury Notes with 10-year maturities.
 
SBA regulations currently limit the amount that the Company’s SBIC subsidiary may borrow to a maximum of $150 million when it has at least $75 million in regulatory capital, receives a capital commitment from the SBA and has been through an examination by the SBA subsequent to licensing. As of March 31, 2011, the Company’s SBIC subsidiary had $75 million in regulatory capital. The SBA has issued a capital commitment to the Company’s SBIC subsidiary in the amount of $150 million, and $138.3 million of SBA debentures were outstanding as of March 31, 2011. $73.0 million of these debentures bear interest at a rate of 3.50% per annum, including the SBA annual charge of 0.285%, and $65.3 million of these debentures bear interest at a rate of 4.369% per annum, including the SBA annual charge of 0.285%.
 
The SBA restricts the ability of SBICs to repurchase their capital stock. SBA regulations also include restrictions on a “change of control” or transfer of an SBIC and require that SBICs invest idle funds in accordance with SBA regulations. In addition, the Company’s SBIC subsidiary may also be limited in its ability to make distributions to the Company if it does not have sufficient capital, in accordance with SBA regulations.
 
The Company’s SBIC subsidiary is subject to regulation and oversight by the SBA, including requirements with respect to maintaining certain minimum financial ratios and other covenants. Receipt of an SBIC license does not assure that the SBIC subsidiary will receive SBA-guaranteed debenture funding and is dependent upon the SBIC subsidiary continuing to be in compliance with SBA regulations and policies.
 
The SBA, as a creditor, will have a superior claim to the SBIC subsidiary’s assets over the Company’s stockholders in the event the Company liquidates the SBIC subsidiary or the SBA exercises its remedies under the SBA-guaranteed debentures issued by the SBIC subsidiary upon an event of default.
 
The Company has received exemptive relief from the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) to permit it to exclude the debt of the SBIC subsidiary guaranteed by the SBA from the definition of senior securities in the Company’s 200% asset coverage test under the 1940 Act. This allows the Company increased flexibility under the 200% asset coverage test by permitting it to borrow up to $150 million more than it would otherwise be able to under the 1940 Act absent the receipt of this exemptive relief.
 
Note 2.   Significant Accounting Policies
 
Basis of Presentation and Liquidity:
 
The Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) and Regulation S-X. In the opinion of management, all adjustments of a normal recurring nature considered necessary for the fair presentation of the Consolidated Financial Statements have been made. The financial results of the Company’s portfolio investments are not consolidated in the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.
 
Although the Company expects to fund the growth of its investment portfolio through the net proceeds from the recent and future equity offerings, the Company’s dividend reinvestment plan, and issuances of senior securities or future borrowings, to the extent permitted by the 1940 Act, the Company cannot assure that its plans to raise capital will be successful. In addition, the Company intends to distribute to its stockholders between 90% and 100% of its taxable income each year in order to satisfy the requirements applicable to Regulated Investment Companies (“RICs”) under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code (“Code”). Consequently, the Company may not have the funds or the ability to fund new investments, to make additional investments in its portfolio companies, to fund its unfunded commitments to portfolio companies or to repay borrowings. In addition, the illiquidity of its portfolio investments may make it difficult for the Company to


S-66


Table of Contents

FIFTH STREET FINANCE CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
sell these investments when desired and, if the Company is required to sell these investments, it may realize significantly less than their recorded value.
 
Use of Estimates:
 
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions affecting amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. These estimates are based on the information that is currently available to the Company and on various other assumptions that the Company believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates under different assumptions and conditions. The most significant estimates inherent in the preparation of the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements are the valuation of investments and revenue recognition.
 
The Consolidated Financial Statements include portfolio investments at fair value of $939.7 million and $563.8 million at March 31, 2011 and September 30, 2010, respectively. The portfolio investments represent 132.0% and 99.1% of net assets at March 31, 2011 and September 30, 2010, respectively, and their fair values have been determined by the Company’s Board of Directors in good faith in the absence of readily available market values. Because of the inherent uncertainty of valuation, the determined values may differ significantly from the values that would have been used had a ready market existed for the investments, and the differences could be material.
 
The Company classifies its investments in accordance with the requirements of the 1940 Act. Under the 1940 Act, “Control Investments” are defined as investments in companies in which the Company owns more than 25% of the voting securities or has rights to maintain greater than 50% of the board representation; “Affiliate Investments” are defined as investments in companies in which the Company owns between 5% and 25% of the voting securities; and “Non-Control/Non-Affiliate Investments” are defined as investments that are neither Control Investments nor Affiliate Investments.
 
Fair Value Measurements:
 
The Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 820 Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (“ASC 820”) defines fair value as the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. A liability’s fair value is defined as the amount that would be paid to transfer the liability to a new obligor, not the amount that would be paid to settle the liability with the creditor. Where available, fair value is based on observable market prices or parameters or derived from such prices or parameters. Where observable prices or inputs are not available or reliable, valuation techniques are applied. These valuation techniques involve some level of management estimation and judgment, the degree of which is dependent on the price transparency for the investments or market and the investments’ complexity.
 
Assets recorded at fair value in the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements are categorized based upon the level of judgment associated with the inputs used to measure their fair value.
 
Hierarchical levels, defined by ASC 820 and directly related to the amount of subjectivity associated with the inputs to fair valuation of these assets and liabilities, are as follows:
 
  •  Level 1 — Unadjusted, quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities at the measurement date.
 
  •  Level 2 — Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data at the measurement date for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.


S-67


Table of Contents

FIFTH STREET FINANCE CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
 
  •  Level 3 — Unobservable inputs that reflect management’s best estimate of what market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability at the measurement date. Consideration is given to the risk inherent in the valuation technique and the risk inherent in the inputs to the model.
 
Under ASC 820, the Company performs detailed valuations of its debt and equity investments on an individual basis, using market, income and bond yield approaches as appropriate. In general, the Company utilizes the bond yield method in determining the fair value of its investments, as long as it is appropriate. If, in the Company’s judgment, the bond yield approach is not appropriate, it may use the enterprise value approach in determining the fair value of the Company’s investment in the portfolio company. If there is deterioration in the credit quality of the portfolio company or an investment is in workout status, the Company may use alternative methodologies, including an asset liquidation or expected recovery model.
 
Under the market approach, the Company estimates the enterprise value of the portfolio companies in which it invests. There is no one methodology to estimate enterprise value and, in fact, for any one portfolio company, enterprise value is best expressed as a range of fair values, from which the Company derives a single estimate of enterprise value. To estimate the enterprise value of a portfolio company, the Company analyzes various factors, including the portfolio company’s historical and projected financial results. Typically, private companies are valued based on multiples of EBITDA, cash flows, net income, revenues, or in limited cases, book value. The Company generally requires portfolio companies to provide annual audited and quarterly and monthly unaudited financial statements, as well as annual projections for the upcoming fiscal year.
 
Under the income approach, the Company generally prepares and analyzes discounted cash flow models based on projections of the future free cash flows of the business.
 
Under the bond yield approach, the Company uses bond yield models to determine the present value of the future cash flow streams of its debt investments. The Company reviews various sources of transactional data, including private mergers and acquisitions involving debt investments with similar characteristics, and assesses the information in the valuation process.
 
The Company’s Board of Directors undertakes a multi-step valuation process each quarter in connection with determining the fair value of the Company’s investments:
 
  •  The quarterly valuation process begins with each portfolio company or investment being initially valued by the deal team within the Investment Adviser responsible for the portfolio investment;
 
  •  Preliminary valuations are then reviewed and discussed with the principals of the Investment Adviser;
 
  •  Separately, independent valuation firms engaged by the Board of Directors prepare preliminary valuations on a selected basis and submit the reports to the Company;
 
  •  The deal team compares and contrasts its preliminary valuations to the preliminary valuations of the independent valuation firms;
 
  •  The deal team prepares a valuation report for the Valuation Committee of the Board of Directors;
 
  •  The Valuation Committee of the Board of Directors is apprised of the preliminary valuations of the independent valuation firms;
 
  •  The Valuation Committee of the Board of Directors reviews the preliminary valuations, and the deal team responds and supplements the preliminary valuations to reflect any comments provided by the Valuation Committee;
 
  •  The Valuation Committee of the Board of Directors makes a recommendation to the Board of Directors; and


S-68


Table of Contents

FIFTH STREET FINANCE CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
 
  •  The Board of Directors discusses valuations and determines the fair value of each investment in the Company’s portfolio in good faith.
 
The fair value of all of the Company’s investments at March 31, 2011 and September 30, 2010 was determined by the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors is solely responsible for the valuation of the portfolio investments at fair value as determined in good faith pursuant to the Company’s valuation policy and a consistently applied valuation process.
 
The Board of Directors has engaged independent valuation firms to provide valuation assistance. Upon completion of their processes each quarter, the independent valuation firms provide the Company with written reports regarding the preliminary valuations of selected portfolio securities as of the close of such quarter. The Company will continue to engage independent valuation firms to provide assistance regarding the determination of the fair value of selected portfolio securities each quarter; however, the Board of Directors is ultimately and solely responsible for determining the fair value of the Company’s investments in good faith.
 
Realized gain or loss on the sale of investments is the difference between the proceeds received from dispositions of portfolio investments and their stated costs. Realized losses may also be recorded in connection with the Company’s determination that certain investments are considered worthless securities and/or meet the conditions for loss recognition per the applicable tax rules.
 
Investment Income:
 
Interest income, adjusted for amortization of premium and accretion of original issue discount, is recorded on an accrual basis to the extent that such amounts are expected to be collected. The Company stops accruing interest on investments when it is determined that interest is no longer collectible. In connection with its investment, the Company sometimes receives nominal cost equity that is valued as part of the negotiation process with the particular portfolio company. When the Company receives nominal cost equity, the Company allocates its cost basis in its investment between its debt securities and its nominal cost equity at the time of origination. Any resulting discount from recording the loan is accreted into interest income over the life of the loan.
 
Distributions of earnings from portfolio companies are recorded as dividend income when the distribution is received.
 
The Company has investments in debt securities which contain a payment-in-kind or “PIK” interest provision. PIK interest is computed at the contractual rate specified in each investment agreement and added to the principal balance of the investment and recorded as income.
 
Fee income consists of the monthly collateral management fees that the Company receives in connection with its debt investments and the accreted portion of the debt origination fees. The Company capitalizes upfront loan origination fees received in connection with investments. The unearned fee income from such fees is accreted into fee income, based on the straight line method or effective interest method as applicable, over the life of the investment.
 
The Company has also structured exit fees across certain of its portfolio investments to be received upon the future exit of those investments. These fees are to be paid to the Company upon the sooner to occur of (i) a sale of the borrower or substantially all of the assets of the borrower, (ii) the maturity date of the loan, or (iii) the date when full prepayment of the loan occurs. Exit fees are fees which are payable upon the exit of a debt security, and a percentage of these fees are included in net investment income over the life of the loan. The receipt of such fees is contingent upon a successful exit event for each of the investments.


S-69


Table of Contents

FIFTH STREET FINANCE CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
Cash and Cash Equivalents:
 
Cash and cash equivalents consist of demand deposits and highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less, when acquired. The Company places its cash and cash equivalents with financial institutions and, at times, cash held in bank accounts may exceed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insured limit. Included in cash and cash equivalents is $0.6 million that is held at Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (“Wells Fargo”) in connection with the Company’s three-year credit facility. The Company is restricted in terms of access to this cash until such time as the Company submits its required monthly reporting schedules and Wells Fargo verifies the Company’s compliance per the terms of the credit agreement.
 
Deferred Financing Costs:
 
Deferred financing costs consist of fees and expenses paid in connection with the closing of credit facilities and are capitalized at the time of payment. Deferred financing costs are amortized using the straight line method over the terms of the respective credit facilities. This amortization expense is included in interest expense in the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Operations.
 
Collateral Posted to Bank:
 
Collateral posted to bank consists of cash posted as collateral with respect to the Company’s interest rate swap. The Company is restricted in terms of access to this collateral until such swap is terminated or the swap agreement expires. Cash collateral posted is held in an account at Wells Fargo.
 
Interest Rate Swap:
 
The Company does not utilize hedge accounting and marks its interest rate swap to fair value on a quarterly basis through its Consolidated Statement of Operations.
 
Offering Costs:
 
Offering costs consist of fees and expenses incurred in connection with the public offer and sale of the Company’s common stock, including legal, accounting, and printing fees. $0.5 million of offering costs have been charged to capital during the six months ended March 31, 2011.
 
Income Taxes:
 
As a RIC, the Company is not subject to federal income tax on the portion of its taxable income and gains distributed currently to its stockholders as a dividend. The Company intends to distribute between 90% and 100% of its taxable income and gains, within the Subchapter M rules, and thus the Company anticipates that it will not incur any federal or state income tax at the RIC level. As a RIC, the Company is also subject to a federal excise tax based on distributive requirements of its taxable income on a calendar year basis (e.g., calendar year 2011). The Company anticipates timely distribution of its taxable income within the tax rules; however, the Company incurred a de minimis federal excise tax for calendar years 2008 2009 and 2010. In addition, the Company may incur a federal excise tax in future years.
 
The purpose of the Company’s taxable subsidiaries is to permit the Company to hold equity investments in portfolio companies which are “pass through” entities for federal tax purposes in order to comply with the “source income” requirements contained in the RIC tax requirements. The taxable subsidiaries are not consolidated with the Company for income tax purposes and may generate income tax expense as a result of their ownership of certain portfolio investments. This income tax expense, if any, would be reflected in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations. The Company uses the asset and liability method to account for its taxable subsidiaries’ income taxes. Using this method, the Company recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities for the estimated future tax effects attributable to temporary differences between financial


S-70


Table of Contents

FIFTH STREET FINANCE CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities. In addition, the Company recognizes deferred tax benefits associated with net operating carry forwards that it may use to offset future tax obligations. The Company measures deferred tax assets and liabilities using the enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which it expects to recover or settle those temporary differences.
 
ASC 740 Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes (“ASC 740”) provides guidance for how uncertain tax positions should be recognized, measured, presented, and disclosed in the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements. ASC 740 requires the evaluation of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in the course of preparing the Company’s tax returns to determine whether the tax positions are “more-likely-than-not” of being sustained by the applicable tax authority. Tax positions not deemed to meet the more-likely-than-not threshold are recorded as a tax benefit or expense in the current year. Management’s determinations regarding ASC 740 may be subject to review and adjustment at a later date based upon factors including, but not limited to, an ongoing analysis of tax laws, regulations and interpretations thereof. The Company recognizes the tax benefits of uncertain tax positions only where the position is “more likely than not” to be sustained assuming examination by tax authorities. Management has analyzed the Company’s tax positions, and has concluded that no liability for unrecognized tax benefits should be recorded related to uncertain tax positions taken on returns filed for open tax years 2008 or 2009 or expected to be taken in the Company’s 2010 tax return. The Company identifies its major tax jurisdictions as U.S. Federal and New York State, and the Company is not aware of any tax positions for which it is reasonably possible that the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits will change materially in the next 12 months.
 
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
 
In January 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-06, Fair Value Measurements and Improving Disclosures About Fair Value Measurements (Topic 820), which provides for improving disclosures about fair value measurements, primarily significant transfers in and out of Levels 1 and 2, and activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. The disclosures and clarifications of existing disclosures are effective for the interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, while the disclosures about the purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the roll forward activity in Level 3 fair value measurements are effective for fiscal years after December 15, 2010 and for the interim periods within those fiscal years. Except for certain detailed Level 3 disclosures, which are effective for fiscal years after December 15, 2010 and interim periods within those years, the new guidance became effective for the Company’s fiscal 2010 second quarter. The adoption of this disclosure-only guidance is included in Note 3 — Portfolio Investments and did not have an impact on the Company’s consolidated financial results.
 
Note 3.   Portfolio Investments
 
At March 31, 2011, 132.0% of net assets or $939.7 million was invested in 55 long-term portfolio investments and 5.4% of net assets or $38.6 million was invested in cash and cash equivalents. In comparison, at September 30, 2010, 99.1% of net assets or $563.8 million was invested in 38 long-term portfolio investments and 13.5% of net assets or $76.8 million was invested in cash and cash equivalents. As of March 31, 2011, primarily all of the Company’s debt investments were secured by first or second priority liens on the assets of the portfolio companies. Moreover, the Company held equity investments in certain of its portfolio companies consisting of common stock, preferred stock or limited liability company interests designed to provide the Company with an opportunity for an enhanced rate of return. These instruments generally do not produce a current return, but are held for potential investment appreciation and capital gain.
 
During the three and six months ended March 31, 2011, the Company recorded net realized losses on investments of $0.5 million and $14.0 million, respectively. During the three and six months ended March 31, 2010, the Company recorded net realized losses on investments of $2.9 million and $2.8 million, respectively. During the three and six months ended March 31, 2011, the Company recorded net unrealized depreciation of


S-71


Table of Contents

FIFTH STREET FINANCE CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
$0.4 million and net unrealized appreciation of $16.5 million, respectively. During the three and six months ended March 31, 2010, the Company recorded net unrealized appreciation of $1.2 million and $2.2 million, respectively.
 
The composition of the Company’s investments as of March 31, 2011 and September 30, 2010 at cost and fair value was as follows:
 
                                 
    March 31, 2011     September 30, 2010  
    Cost     Fair Value     Cost     Fair Value  
 
Investments in debt securities
  $ 939,758,904     $ 928,817,827     $ 585,529,301     $ 558,579,951  
Investments in equity securities
    13,434,303       10,931,226       6,967,294       5,241,365  
                                 
Total
  $ 953,193,207     $ 939,749,053     $ 592,496,595     $ 563,821,316  
                                 
 
The composition of the Company’s debt investments as of March 31, 2011 and September 30, 2010 at fixed rates and floating rates was as follows:
 
                                 
    March 31, 2011     September 30, 2010  
    Fair Value     % of Portfolio     Fair Value     % of Portfolio  
 
Fixed rate debt securities
  $ 375,510,714       40.43 %   $ 375,584,242       67.24 %
Floating rate debt securities
    553,307,113       59.57 %     182,995,709       32.76 %
                                 
Total
  $ 928,817,827       100.00 %   $ 558,579,951       100.00 %
                                 
 
The following table presents the financial instruments carried at fair value as of March 31, 2011, by caption on the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Assets and Liabilities for each of the three levels of hierarchy established by ASC 820.
 
                                 
    Level 1     Level 2     Level 3     Total  
 
Investments in debt securities (first lien)
  $     $     $ 821,884,661     $ 821,884,661  
Investments in debt securities (second lien)
                82,586,455       82,586,455  
Investments in debt securities (subordinated)
                24,346,711       24,346,711  
Investments in equity securities (preferred)
                4,559,714       4,559,714  
Investments in equity securities (common)
                6,371,512       6,371,512  
                                 
Total investments at fair value
  $     $     $ 939,749,053     $ 939,749,053  
Interest rate swap
          197,121             197,121  
                                 
Total assets at fair value
  $     $ 197,121     $     $ 939,946,174  
                                 


S-72


Table of Contents

FIFTH STREET FINANCE CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
The following table presents the financial instruments carried at fair value as of September 30, 2010, by caption on the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Assets and Liabilities for each of the three levels of hierarchy established by ASC 820.
 
                                 
    Level 1     Level 2     Level 3     Total  
 
Investments in debt securities (first lien)
  $     $     $ 416,323,957     $ 416,323,957  
Investments in debt securities (second lien)
                137,851,248       137,851,248  
Investments in debt securities (subordinated)
                4,404,746       4,404,746  
Investments in equity securities (preferred)
                2,892,135       2,892,135  
Investments in equity securities (common)
                2,349,230       2,349,230  
                                 
Total investments at fair value
  $     $     $ 563,821,316     $ 563,821,316  
Interest rate swap
          773,435             773,435  
                                 
Total liabilities at fair value
  $     $ 773,435     $     $ 773,435  
                                 
 
When a determination is made to classify a financial instrument within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy, the determination is based upon the fact that the unobservable factors are the most significant to the overall fair value measurement. However, Level 3 financial instruments typically include, in addition to the unobservable or Level 3 components, observable components (that is, components that are actively quoted and can be validated by external sources). Accordingly, the appreciation (depreciation) in the tables below includes changes in fair value due in part to observable factors that are part of the valuation methodology.
 
The following table provides a roll-forward in the changes in fair value from December 31, 2010 to March 31, 2011 for all investments for which the Company determines fair value using unobservable (Level 3) factors.
 
                                                 
    First
    Second
    Subordinated
    Preferred
    Common
       
    Lien Debt     Lien Debt     Debt     Equity     Equity     Total  
 
Fair value as of December 31, 2010
  $ 642,402,398     $ 85,394,636     $ 4,221,399     $ 3,963,240     $ 6,413,662     $ 742,395,335  
New investments & net revolver activity
    196,101,572             21,098,928       999,000       904,786       219,104,286  
Redemptions/repayments
    (17,074,472 )     (2,679,662 )                       (19,754,134 )
Net accrual of PIK interest income
    1,895,461       (241,057 )     214,910                   1,869,314  
Accretion of original issue discount
    337,962       82,328                         420,290  
Net change in unearned income
    (2,844,253 )     119,105       (388,889 )                 (3,114,037 )
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation)
    1,334,579       (88,895 )     (799,637 )     (148,680 )     (903,786 )     (606,419 )
Net change from unrealized to realized
    (268,586 )                 (253,846 )     (43,150 )     (565,582 )
Transfer into (out of) Level 3
                                   
                                                 
Fair value as of March 31, 2011
  $ 821,884,661     $ 82,586,455     $ 24,346,711     $ 4,559,714     $ 6,371,512     $ 939,749,053  
                                                 


S-73


Table of Contents

FIFTH STREET FINANCE CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
                                                 
    First
    Second
    Subordinated
    Preferred
    Common
       
    Lien Debt     Lien Debt     Debt     Equity     Equity     Total  
 
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) relating to Level 3 assets still held at March 31, 2011 and reported within net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments in the Consolidated Statement of Operations for the three months ended March 31, 2011
  $ 1,065,992     $ (88,895 )   $ (799,637 )   $ (402,526 )   $ (946,936 )   $ (1,172,002 )
 
The following table provides a roll-forward in the changes in fair value from December 31, 2009 to March 31, 2010, for all investments for which the Company determines fair value using unobservable (Level 3) factors.
 
                                                 
    First
    Second
    Subordinated
    Preferred
    Common
       
    Lien Debt     Lien Debt     Debt     Equity     Equity     Total  
 
Fair value as of December 31, 2009
  $ 280,768,502     $ 152,254,769     $     $ 2,661,823     $ 1,008,446     $ 436,693,540  
New investments & net revolver activity
    38,267,938                         480,914       38,748,852  
Redemptions/repayments
    (1,757,500 )     (13,252,034 )                 (71,003 )     (15,080,537 )
Net accrual of PIK interest income
    1,274,728       920,445                         2,195,173  
Accretion of original issue discount
    124,757       102,727                         227,484  
Net change in unearned income
    (548,719 )     360,976                         (187,743 )
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation)
    (408,039 )     (1,828,808 )                 3,413,558       1,176,711  
Net change from unrealized to realized
          (611,084 )                 (2,297,000 )     (2,908,084 )
Transfer into (out of) Level 3
                                   
                                                 
Fair value as of March 31, 2010
  $ 317,721,667     $ 137,946,991     $     $ 2,661,823     $ 2,534,915     $ 460,865,396  
                                                 
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) relating to Level 3 assets still held at March 31, 2010 and reported within net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments in the Consolidated Statement of Operations for the three months ended March 31, 2010
  $ (408,039 )   $ (2,801,978 )   $     $     $ 1,116,558     $ (2,093,459 )

S-74


Table of Contents

FIFTH STREET FINANCE CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
The following table provides a roll-forward in the changes in fair value from September 30, 2010 to March 31, 2011 for all investments for which the Company determines fair value using unobservable (Level 3) factors.
 
                                                 
    First
    Second
    Subordinated
    Preferred
    Common
       
    Lien Debt     Lien Debt     Debt     Equity     Equity     Total  
 
Fair value as of September 30, 2010
  $ 416,323,957     $ 137,851,248     $ 4,404,746     $ 2,892,135     $ 2,349,230     $ 563,821,316  
New investments & net revolver activity
    425,949,652             21,064,910       2,036,112       4,727,894       453,778,568  
Redemptions/repayments
    (20,887,909 )     (52,567,380 )                       (73,455,289 )
Net accrual of PIK interest income
    3,690,849       (4,213,530 )     426,661                   (96,020 )
Accretion of original issue discount
    494,029       314,898                         808,927  
Net change in unearned income
    (7,121,126 )     917,653       (388,889 )                 (6,592,362 )
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation)
    17,154,014       283,566       (1,160,717 )     (114,687 )     (662,462 )     15,499,714  
Net change from unrealized to realized
    (13,718,805 )                 (253,846 )     (43,150 )     (14,015,801 )
Transfer into (out of) Level 3
                                   
                                                 
Fair value as of March 31, 2011
  $ 821,884,661     $ 82,586,455     $ 24,346,711     $ 4,559,714     $ 6,371,512     $ 939,749,053  
                                                 
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) relating to Level 3 assets still held at March 31, 2011 and reported within net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments in the Consolidated Statement of Operations for the six months ended March 31, 2011
  $ 6,625,331     $ 503,467     $ (1,160,717 )   $ (368,533 )   $ (705,612 )   $ 4,893,936  
 
The following table provides a roll-forward in the changes in fair value from September 30, 2009 to March 31, 2010, for all investments for which the Company determines fair value using unobservable (Level 3) factors.
 
                                                 
    First
    Second
    Subordinated
    Preferred
    Common
       
    Lien Debt     Lien Debt     Debt     Equity     Equity     Total  
 
Fair value as of September 30, 2009
  $ 142,016,942     $ 153,904,458     $     $ 2,889,471     $ 800,266     $ 299,611,137  
New investments & net revolver activity
    170,031,723       6,000,000                   634,886       176,666,609  
Redemptions/repayments
    6,708,213       (21,290,133 )                 (71,003 )     (14,652,923 )
Net accrual of PIK interest income
    2,061,244       1,570,509                         3,631,753  
Accretion of original issue discount
    232,289       216,138                         448,427  
Net change in unearned income
    (4,564,359 )     456,831                         (4,107,528 )
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation)
    1,235,615       (2,299,728 )           (227,648 )     3,467,766       2,176,005  
Net change from unrealized to realized
          (611,084 )                 (2,297,000 )     (2,908,084 )
Transfer into (out of) Level 3
                                   
                                                 
Fair value as of March 31, 2010
  $ 317,721,667     $ 137,946,991     $     $ 2,661,823     $ 2,534,915     $ 460,865,396  
                                                 


S-75


Table of Contents

FIFTH STREET FINANCE CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
                                                 
    First
    Second
    Subordinated
    Preferred
    Common
       
    Lien Debt     Lien Debt     Debt     Equity     Equity     Total  
 
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) relating to Level 3 assets still held at March 31, 2010 and reported within net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments in the Consolidated Statement of Operations for the six months ended March 31, 2010
  $ 1,235,615     $ (3,514,541 )   $     $ (227,648 )   $ 1,170,766     $ (1,335,808 )
 
Concurrent with its adoption of ASC 820, effective October 1, 2008, the Company augmented the valuation techniques it uses to estimate the fair value of its debt investments where there is not a readily available market value (Level 3). Prior to October 1, 2008, the Company estimated the fair value of its Level 3 debt investments by first estimating the enterprise value of the portfolio company which issued the debt investment. To estimate the enterprise value of a portfolio company, the Company analyzed various factors, including the portfolio companies historical and projected financial results. Typically, private companies are valued based on multiples of EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization), cash flow, net income, revenues or, in limited instances, book value.
 
In estimating a multiple to use for valuation purposes, the Company looked to private merger and acquisition statistics, discounted public trading multiples or industry practices. In some cases, the best valuation methodology may have been a discounted cash flow analysis based on future projections. If a portfolio company was distressed, a liquidation analysis may have provided the best indication of enterprise value.
 
If there was adequate enterprise value to support the repayment of the Company’s debt, the fair value of the Level 3 loan or debt security normally corresponded to cost plus the amortized original issue discount unless the borrower’s condition or other factors lead to a determination of fair value at a different amount.
 
Beginning on October 1, 2008, the Company also introduced a bond yield model to value these investments based on the present value of expected cash flows. The significant inputs into the model are market interest rates for debt with similar characteristics and an adjustment for the portfolio company’s credit risk. The credit risk component of the valuation considers several factors including financial performance, business outlook, debt priority and collateral position.
 
The Company’s off-balance sheet arrangements consisted of $85.6 million and $49.5 million of unfunded commitments to provide debt financing to its portfolio companies or to fund limited partnership interests as of March 31, 2011 and September 30, 2010, respectively. Such commitments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit risk in excess of the amount recognized in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities and are not reflected on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Assets and Liabilities.

S-76


Table of Contents

FIFTH STREET FINANCE CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
A summary of the composition of the unfunded commitments (consisting of revolvers, term loans and limited partnership interests) as of March 31, 2011 and September 30, 2010 is shown in the table below:
 
                 
    March 31, 2011     September 30, 2010  
 
Traffic Control & Safety Corporation
  $ 2,250,000     $  
HealthDrive Corporation
    1,000,000       1,500,000  
IZI Medical Products, Inc. 
    2,500,000       2,500,000  
Trans-Trade, Inc. 
    1,000,000       500,000  
Riverlake Equity Partners II, LP (limited partnership interest)
    877,895       966,360  
Riverside Fund IV, LP (limited partnership interest)
    583,522       864,175  
ADAPCO, Inc. 
    5,250,000       5,750,000  
AmBath/ReBath Holdings, Inc. 
    1,500,000       1,500,000  
JTC Education, Inc. 
    5,159,479       9,062,453  
Tegra Medical, LLC
    2,500,000       4,000,000  
Vanguard Vinyl, Inc. 
          1,250,000  
Flatout, Inc. 
    1,500,000       1,500,000  
Psilos Group Partners IV, LP (limited partnership interest)
    1,000,000       1,000,000  
Mansell Group, Inc. 
    1,000,000       2,000,000  
NDSSI Holdings, Inc. 
    1,500,000       1,500,000  
Eagle Hospital Physicians, Inc. 
    2,500,000       2,500,000  
Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC
    3,000,000       3,623,148  
Epic Acquisition, Inc. 
    2,400,000       2,700,000  
Specialty Bakers, LLC
    4,000,000       2,000,000  
Rail Acquisition Corp. 
    4,879,435       4,798,897  
Bunker Hill Capital II (QP), L.P. (limited partnership interest)
    1,000,000        
CRGT, Inc. 
    12,500,000        
Welocalize, Inc. 
    3,750,000        
Miche Bag, LLC
    5,000,000        
Dominion Diagnostics, LLC
    5,000,000        
Advanced Pain Management
    400,000        
DISA, Inc. 
    4,000,000        
Saddleback Fence and Vinyl Products, Inc. 
    400,000        
Best Vinyl Fence & Deck, LLC
    1,000,000        
Physicians Pharmacy Alliance, Inc. 
    2,000,000        
Cardon Healthcare Network, LLC
    2,000,000        
IOS Acquisitions, Inc. 
    2,000,000        
Phoenix Brands Merger Sub LLC
    2,142,857        
                 
Total
  $ 85,593,188     $ 49,515,033  
                 


S-77


Table of Contents

FIFTH STREET FINANCE CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
Summaries of the composition of the Company’s investment portfolio at cost and fair value as a percentage of total investments are shown in the following tables:
 
                                 
    March 31, 2011     September 30, 2010  
 
Cost:
                               
First lien debt
  $ 819,025,973       85.92 %   $ 430,200,694       72.61 %
Second lien debt
    95,052,449       9.97 %     150,600,807       25.42 %
Subordinated debt
    25,680,482       2.69 %     4,727,800       0.80 %
Purchased equity
    6,216,015       0.65 %     2,330,305       0.39 %
Equity grants
    6,679,705       0.70 %     4,467,524       0.75 %
Limited partnership interests
    538,583       0.07 %     169,465       0.03 %
                                 
Total
  $ 953,193,207       100.00 %   $ 592,496,595       100.00 %
                                 
 
                                 
    March 31, 2011     September 30, 2010  
 
Fair value:
                               
First lien debt
  $ 821,884,661       87.46 %   $ 416,323,957       73.84 %
Second lien debt
    82,586,455       8.79 %     137,851,248       24.45 %
Subordinated debt
    24,346,711       2.59 %     4,404,746       0.78 %
Purchased equity
    3,973,327       0.42 %     625,371       0.11 %
Equity grants
    6,419,316       0.68 %     4,446,529       0.79 %
Limited partnership interests
    538,583       0.06 %     169,465       0.03 %
                                 
Total
  $ 939,749,053       100.00 %   $ 563,821,316       100.00 %
                                 
 
The Company invests in portfolio companies located in the United States. The following tables show the portfolio composition by geographic region at cost and fair value as a percentage of total investments. The geographic composition is determined by the location of the corporate headquarters of the portfolio company, which may not be indicative of the primary source of the portfolio company’s business.
 
                                 
    March 31, 2011     September 30, 2010  
 
Cost:
                               
Northeast
  $ 294,387,203       30.88 %   $ 175,370,861       29.60 %
Southwest
    236,037,587       24.77 %     121,104,464       20.44 %
Southeast
    185,861,206       19.50 %     108,804,931       18.36 %
West
    155,539,266       16.32 %     133,879,457       22.60 %
Midwest
    81,367,945       8.53 %     53,336,882       9.00 %
                                 
Total
  $ 953,193,207       100.00 %   $ 592,496,595       100.00 %
                                 
 
                                 
    March 31, 2011     September 30, 2010  
 
Fair value:
                               
Northeast
  $ 285,198,168       30.35 %   $ 161,264,153       28.60 %
Southwest
    222,098,808       23.63 %     107,468,588       19.07 %
Southeast
    191,004,149       20.33 %     109,457,070       19.41 %
West
    157,478,117       16.76 %     131,881,487       23.39 %
Midwest
    83,969,811       8.93 %     53,750,018       9.53 %
                                 
Total
  $ 939,749,053       100.00 %   $ 563,821,316       100.00 %
                                 


S-78


Table of Contents

FIFTH STREET FINANCE CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
The composition of the Company’s portfolio by industry at cost and fair value as of March 31, 2011 and September 30, 2010 were as follows:
 
                                 
    March 31, 2011     September 30, 2010  
 
Cost:
                               
Healthcare services
  $ 176,032,901       18.47 %   $ 87,443,639       14.76 %
Healthcare equipment
    72,090,715       7.56 %     47,539,596       8.02 %
IT consulting & other services
    49,879,168       5.23 %           0.00 %
Diversified support services
    49,479,327       5.19 %     26,246,237       4.43 %
Oil & gas equipment & services
    45,265,873       4.75 %           0.00 %
Education services
    42,845,187       4.49 %     44,901,602       7.58 %
Internet software & services
    41,033,487       4.30 %           0.00 %
Construction and engineering
    39,661,650       4.16 %     24,987,230       4.22 %
Specialty stores
    39,397,846       4.13 %           0.00 %
Household products
    33,276,524       3.49 %     1,064,910       0.18 %
Electronic equipment & instruments
    32,940,708       3.46 %     33,094,495       5.59 %
Apparel, accessories & luxury goods
    31,724,188       3.33 %     23,535,757       3.97 %
Home improvement retail
    28,208,636       2.96 %     32,630,879       5.51 %
Fertilizers & agricultural chemicals
    26,449,828       2.77 %     26,694,525       4.51 %
Food distributors
    26,375,460       2.77 %     30,415,200       5.13 %
Healthcare technology
    21,210,996       2.23 %     21,509,107       3.63 %
Human resources & employment services
    20,847,571       2.19 %           0.00 %
Electronic manufacturing services
    19,672,717       2.06 %     18,738,072       3.16 %
Food retail
    19,264,166       2.02 %     19,622,414       3.31 %
Advertising
    19,017,503       2.00 %     19,828,343       3.35 %
Air freight and logistics
    17,394,699       1.82 %     14,004,766       2.36 %
Trucking
    17,064,785       1.79 %     17,064,785       2.88 %
Distributors
    13,520,365       1.42 %     13,350,633       2.25 %
Data processing and outsourced services
    13,127,545       1.38 %     13,078,169       2.21 %
Other diversified financial services
    11,361,007       1.19 %           0.00 %
Industrial machinery
    10,299,306       1.08 %     10,143,414       1.71 %
Leisure facilities
    6,702,285       0.70 %     6,863,521       1.16 %
Building products
    6,583,589       0.69 %     8,291,678       1.40 %
Construction materials
    6,578,609       0.69 %     17,475,899       2.95 %
Environmental & facilities services
    5,688,981       0.60 %     8,921,676       1.51 %
Housewares & specialties
    5,356,187       0.56 %     12,195,029       2.06 %
Restaurants
    4,102,646       0.43 %     12,485,385       2.11 %
Multi-sector holdings
    538,583       0.07 %     169,465       0.02 %
Movies & entertainment
    200,169       0.02 %     200,169       0.03 %
                                 
Total
  $ 953,193,207       100.00 %   $ 592,496,595       100.00 %
                                 
 


S-79


Table of Contents

FIFTH STREET FINANCE CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
                                 
    March 31, 2011     September 30, 2010  
 
Fair Value:
                               
Healthcare services
  $ 182,188,812       19.39 %   $ 89,261,760       15.83 %
Healthcare equipment
    73,502,072       7.82 %     48,297,921       8.57 %
IT consulting & other services
    51,108,396       5.44 %           0.00 %
Diversified support services
    50,647,896       5.39 %     26,246,237       4.66 %
Oil & gas equipment & services
    46,264,452       4.92 %           0.00 %
Internet software & services
    41,862,450       4.45 %           0.00 %
Specialty stores
    40,543,509       4.31 %           0.00 %
Construction and engineering
    36,421,748       3.88 %     23,844,836       4.23 %
Apparel, accessories & luxury goods
    34,550,016       3.68 %     23,548,933       4.18 %
Household products
    33,990,412       3.62 %     1,064,910       0.19 %
Electronic equipment & instruments
    33,563,929       3.57 %     32,887,767       5.83 %
Education services
    30,022,053       3.19 %     42,110,738       7.47 %
Home improvement retail
    28,218,378       3.00 %     32,483,858       5.76 %
Fertilizers & agricultural chemicals
    27,148,196       2.89 %     26,811,860       4.76 %
Food distributors
    27,139,588       2.89 %     30,316,811       5.38 %
Healthcare technology
    21,951,082       2.34 %     22,140,613       3.93 %
Human resources & employment services
    21,395,889       2.28 %           0.00 %
Food retail
    19,744,856       2.10 %     19,750,316       3.50 %
Advertising
    19,354,331       2.06 %     19,847,065       3.52 %
Air freight and logistics
    17,896,977       1.90 %     14,040,532       2.49 %
Electronic manufacturing services
    14,899,970       1.59 %     18,055,528       3.20 %
Distributors
    13,763,520       1.46 %     13,258,317       2.35 %
Data processing and outsourced services
    12,969,641       1.38 %     12,741,012       2.26 %
Other diversified financial services
    11,700,000       1.25 %           0.00 %
Industrial machinery
    10,907,395       1.16 %     10,232,763       1.81 %
Leisure facilities
    6,859,256       0.73 %     7,040,043       1.25 %
Construction materials
    6,705,597       0.71 %     17,039,751       3.02 %
Building products
    6,697,319       0.71 %     6,841,467       1.21 %
Environmental & facilities services
    5,639,672       0.60 %     5,129,853       0.91 %
Housewares & specialties
    4,055,655       0.43 %     3,700,000       0.66 %
Trucking
    3,897,412       0.41 %     4,597,412       0.82 %
Restaurants
    3,338,378       0.36 %     12,099,935       2.15 %
Multi-sector holdings
    538,583       0.06 %     169,465       0.01 %
Movies & entertainment
    261,613       0.03 %     261,613       0.05 %
                                 
Total
  $ 939,749,053       100.00 %   $ 563,821,316       100.00 %
                                 
 
The Company’s investments are generally in small and mid-sized companies in a variety of industries. At March 31, 2011 and September 30, 2010, the Company had no single investment that represented greater than 10% of the total investment portfolio at fair value. Income, consisting of interest, dividends, fees, other investment income, and realization of gains or losses, can fluctuate upon repayment or sale of an investment and in any given year can be highly concentrated among several investments. For the three months ended March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010, no individual investment produced income that exceeded 10% of investment income.

S-80


Table of Contents

FIFTH STREET FINANCE CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
Note 4.   Fee Income
 
The Company receives a variety of fees in the ordinary course of business. Certain fees, such as origination fees, are capitalized and amortized in accordance with ASC 310-20 Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs. In accordance with ASC 820, the net unearned fee income balance is netted against the cost of the respective investments. Other fees, such as servicing and collateral management fees, are classified as fee income and recognized as they are earned on a monthly basis.
 
Accumulated unearned fee income activity for the six months ended March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010 was as follows:
 
                 
    Six Months
    Six Months
 
    Ended March 31,
    Ended March 31,
 
    2011     2010  
 
Beginning unearned fee income balance
  $ 11,900,871     $ 5,589,630  
Net fees received
    10,589,519       6,469,801  
Unearned fee income recognized
    (3,997,160 )     (2,312,436 )
                 
Ending unearned fee income balance
  $ 18,493,230     $ 9,746,995  
                 
 
As of March 31, 2011, the Company had structured $7.6 million in aggregate exit fees across 10 portfolio investments upon the future exit of those investments. These fees are to be paid to the Company upon the sooner to occur of (i) a sale of the borrower or substantially all of the assets of the borrower, (ii) the maturity date of the loan, or (iii) the date when full prepayment of the loan occurs. Exit fees are fees which are payable upon the exit of a debt investment and a portion of these fees is included in net investment income over the period of the loan. The receipt of such fees is contingent upon a successful exit event for each of the investments.
 
Note 5.   Share Data
 
Effective January 2, 2008, the Partnership merged with and into the Company. At the time of the merger, all outstanding partnership interests in the Partnership were exchanged for 12,480,972 shares of common stock of the Company. An additional 26 fractional shares were payable to the stockholders in cash.
 
On June 17, 2008, the Company completed an initial public offering of 10,000,000 shares of its common stock at the offering price of $14.12 per share. The net proceeds totaled $129.5 million after deducting investment banking commissions of $9.9 million and offering costs of $1.8 million.
 
On July 21, 2009, the Company completed a follow-on public offering of 9,487,500 shares of its common stock, which included the underwriters’ exercise of their over-allotment option, at the offering price of $9.25 per share. The net proceeds totaled $82.7 million after deducting investment banking commissions of $4.4 million and offering costs of $0.7 million.
 
On September 25, 2009, the Company completed a follow-on public offering of 5,520,000 shares of its common stock, which included the underwriters’ exercise of their over-allotment option, at the offering price of $10.50 per share. The net proceeds totaled $54.9 million after deducting investment banking commissions of $2.8 million and offering costs of $0.3 million.
 
On January 27, 2010, the Company completed a follow-on public offering of 7,000,000 shares of its common stock at the offering price of $11.20 per share, with 300,500 additional shares being sold as part of the underwriters’ partial exercise of their over-allotment option on February 25, 2010. The net proceeds totaled $77.5 million after deducting investment banking commissions of $3.7 million and offering costs of $0.5 million.
 
On April 20, 2010, at the Company’s 2010 Annual Meeting, the Company’s stockholders approved, among other things, amendments to the Company’s restated certificate of incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock from 49,800,000 shares to 150,000,000 shares and to remove the Company’s authority to issue shares of Series A Preferred Stock.


S-81


Table of Contents

FIFTH STREET FINANCE CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
On June 21, 2010, the Company completed a follow-on public offering of 9,200,000 shares of its common stock, which included the underwriters’ exercise of their over-allotment option, at the offering price of $11.50 per share. The net proceeds totaled $100.5 million after deducting investment banking commissions of $4.8 million and offering costs of $0.5 million.
 
On December 7, 2010, the Company entered into an at-the-market equity offering sales agreement relating to shares of its common stock. Throughout the month of December 2010, the Company sold 429,110 shares of its common stock at an average offering price of $11.87 per share. The net proceeds totaled $5.0 million after deducting fees and commissions of $0.1 million. The Company terminated the at-the-market equity offering sales agreement effective January 20, 2011 and did not sell any shares of the Company’s common stock pursuant thereto subsequent to December 31, 2010.
 
On February 4, 2011, the Company completed a follow-on public offering of 11,500,000 shares of its common stock, which included the underwriters’ exercise of their over-allotment option, at the offering price of $12.65 per share. The net proceeds totaled $138.6 million after deducting investment banking commissions of $6.5 million and offering costs of $0.3 million.
 
No dilutive instruments were outstanding and therefore none were reflected in the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Assets and Liabilities at March 31, 2011. The following table sets forth the weighted average common shares outstanding for computing basic and diluted earnings per common share for the three and six months ended March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010:
 
                                 
    Three Months
    Three Months
    Six Months
    Six Months
 
    Ended March 31,
    Ended March 31,
    Ended March 31,
    Ended March 31,
 
    2011     2010     2011     2010  
 
Weighted average common shares outstanding, basic and diluted
    62,120,473       43,019,350       58,339,723       40,421,657  
                                 
 
The following table reflects the dividend distributions per share that the Board of Directors of the Company has declared and the Company has paid, including shares issued under the dividend reinvestment plan (“DRIP”), on its common stock from inception to March 31, 2011:
 
                         
    Record
  Payment
  Amount
  Cash
  DRIP Shares
  DRIP Shares
Date Declared
  Date   Date   per Share   Distribution   Issued   Value
 
5/1/2008
  5/19/2008   6/3/2008   $0.30   $1.9 million   133,317   $1.9 million
8/6/2008
  9/10/2008   9/26/2008   0.31   5.1 million   196,786(1)   1.9 million
12/9/2008
  12/19/2008   12/29/2008   0.32   6.4 million   105,326   0.8 million
12/9/2008
  12/30/2008   1/29/2009   0.33   6.6 million   139,995   0.8 million
12/18/2008
  12/30/2008   1/29/2009   0.05   1.0 million   21,211   0.1 million
4/14/2009
  5/26/2009   6/25/2009   0.25   5.6 million   11,776   0.1 million
8/3/2009
  9/8/2009   9/25/2009   0.25   7.5 million   56,890   0.6 million
11/12/2009
  12/10/2009   12/29/2009   0.27   9.7 million   44,420   0.5 million
1/12/2010
  3/3/2010   3/30/2010   0.30   12.9 million   58,689   0.7 million
5/3/2010
  5/20/2010   6/30/2010   0.32   14.0 million   42,269   0.5 million
8/2/2010
  9/1/2010   9/29/2010   0.10   5.2 million   25,425   0.3 million
8/2/2010
  10/6/2010   10/27/2010   0.10   5.2 million   24,850   0.3 million
8/2/2010
  11/3/2010   11/24/2010   0.11   5.7 million   26,569   0.3 million
8/2/2010
  12/1/2010   12/29/2010   0.11   5.7 million   28,238   0.3 million
11/30/2010
  1/4/2011   1/31/2011   0.1066   5.4 million   36,038   0.5 million
11/30/2010
  2/1/2011   2/28/2011   0.1066   5.5 million   29,072   0.4 million
11/30/2010
  3/1/2011   3/31/2011   0.1066   6.5 million   43,766   0.6 million
 
 
(1) Shares were purchased on the open market and distributed.


S-82


Table of Contents

FIFTH STREET FINANCE CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
 
In October 2008, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program to acquire up to $8 million of the Company’s outstanding common stock. Stock repurchases under this program were made through the open market at times and in such amounts as Company management deemed appropriate. The stock repurchase program expired December 2009. In October 2008, the Company repurchased 78,000 shares of common stock on the open market as part of its share repurchase program.
 
In October 2010, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program to acquire up to $20 million of the Company’s outstanding common stock. Stock repurchases under this program are to be made through the open market at times and in such amounts as the Company’s management deems appropriate, provided it is below the most recently published net asset value per share. The stock repurchase program expires December 31, 2011 and may be limited or terminated by the Board of Directors at any time without prior notice.
 
Note 6.   Lines of Credit
 
On November 16, 2009, Fifth Street Funding, LLC, a consolidated wholly-owned bankruptcy remote, special purpose subsidiary (“Funding”), and the Company entered into a Loan and Servicing Agreement (“Agreement”), with respect to a three-year credit facility (“Wells Fargo facility”) with Wells Fargo, as successor to Wachovia Bank, National Association (“Wachovia”), Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, as administrative agent, each of the additional institutional and conduit lenders party thereto from time to time, and each of the lender agents party thereto from time to time, in the amount of $50 million, with an accordion feature which allowed for potential future expansion of the facility up to $100 million. The facility bore interest at LIBOR plus 4.0% per annum and had a maturity date of November 16, 2012.
 
On May 26, 2010, the Company amended the Wells Fargo facility to expand the borrowing capacity under that facility. Pursuant to the amendment, the Company received an additional $50 million commitment, thereby increasing the size of the facility from $50 million to $100 million, with an accordion feature that allows for potential future expansion of that facility from a total of $100 million up to a total of $150 million. In addition, the interest rate of the Wells Fargo facility was reduced from LIBOR plus 4% per annum to LIBOR plus 3.5% per annum, with no LIBOR floor, and the maturity date of the facility was extended from November 16, 2012 to May 26, 2013. The facility may be extended for up to two additional years upon the mutual consent of Wells Fargo and each of the lender parties thereto.
 
On November 5, 2010, the Company amended the Wells Fargo facility to, among other things, provide for the issuance from time to time of letters of credit for the benefit of the Company’s portfolio companies. The letters of credit are subject to certain restrictions, including a borrowing base limitation and an aggregate sublimit of $15.0 million.
 
On February 28, 2011, the Company amended the Wells Fargo facility to, among other things, reduce the interest rate to LIBOR plus 3.0% per annum, with no LIBOR floor, and extend the maturity date of the facility to February 25, 2014.
 
In connection with the Wells Fargo facility, the Company concurrently entered into (i) a Purchase and Sale Agreement with Funding, pursuant to which the Company will sell to Funding certain loan assets it has originated or acquired, or will originate or acquire and (ii) a Pledge Agreement with Wells Fargo, pursuant to which the Company pledged all of its equity interests in Funding as security for the payment of Funding’s obligations under the Agreement and other documents entered into in connection with the Wells Fargo facility.
 
The Agreement and related agreements governing the Wells Fargo facility required both Funding and the Company to, among other things (i) make representations and warranties regarding the collateral as well as each of their businesses, (ii) agree to certain indemnification obligations, and (iii) comply with various covenants, servicing procedures, limitations on acquiring and disposing of assets, reporting requirements and other customary requirements for similar credit facilities. The Wells Fargo facility agreements also include


S-83


Table of Contents

FIFTH STREET FINANCE CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
usual and customary default provisions such as the failure to make timely payments under the facility, a change in control of Funding, and the failure by Funding or the Company to materially perform under the Agreement and related agreements governing the facility, which, if not complied with, could accelerate repayment under the facility, thereby materially and adversely affecting the Company’s liquidity, financial condition and results of operations. The Company is currently in compliance with all financial covenants under the Wells Fargo facility.
 
The Wells Fargo facility is secured by all of the assets of Funding, and all of the Company’s equity interest in Funding. The Company intends to use the net proceeds of the Wells Fargo facility to fund a portion of its loan origination activities and for general corporate purposes. Each loan origination under the facility is subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions. The Company cannot be assured that Funding will be able to borrow funds under the Wells Fargo facility at any particular time or at all. As of March 31, 2011, the Company had $60.0 million of borrowings outstanding under the Wells Fargo facility.
 
On May 27, 2010, the Company entered into a three-year secured syndicated revolving credit facility (“ING facility”) pursuant to a Senior Secured Revolving Credit Agreement (“ING Credit Agreement”) with certain lenders party thereto from time to time and ING Capital LLC, as administrative agent. The ING facility allows for the Company to borrow money at a rate of either (i) LIBOR plus 3.5% per annum or (ii) 2.5% per annum plus an alternate base rate based on the greatest of the Prime Rate, Federal Funds Rate plus 0.5% per annum or LIBOR plus 1% per annum, and had a maturity date of May 27, 2013. The ING facility also allows the Company to request letters of credit from ING Capital LLC, as the issuing bank. The initial commitment under the ING facility was $90 million, and the ING facility included an accordion feature that allowed for potential future expansion of the facility up to a total of $150 million. The ING facility is secured by substantially all of the Company’s assets, as well as the assets of two of the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiaries, FSFC Holdings, Inc. and FSF/MP Holdings, Inc., subject to certain exclusions for, among other things, equity interests in the Company’s SBIC subsidiary and equity interests in Funding as further set forth in a Guarantee, Pledge and Security Agreement (“ING Security Agreement”) entered into in connection with the ING Credit Agreement, among FSFC Holdings, Inc., FSF/MP Holdings, Inc., ING Capital LLC, as collateral agent, and the Company. Neither the Company’s SBIC subsidiary nor Funding is party to the ING facility and their respective assets have not been pledged in connection therewith. The ING facility provides that the Company may use the proceeds and letters of credit under the facility for general corporate purposes, including acquiring and funding leveraged loans, mezzanine loans, high-yield securities, convertible securities, preferred stock, common stock and other investments.
 
On February 22, 2011, the Company amended the ING facility to, among other things, expand the borrowing capacity to $215 million. In addition, the ING facility’s accordion feature was increased to allow for potential future expansion up to a total of $300 million and the maturity date was extended to February 22, 2014.
 
Pursuant to the ING Security Agreement, FSFC Holdings, Inc. and FSF/MP Holdings, Inc. guaranteed the obligations under the ING Security Agreement, including the Company’s obligations to the lenders and the administrative agent under the ING Credit Agreement. Additionally, the Company pledged its entire equity interests in FSFC Holdings, Inc. and FSF/MP Holdings, Inc. to the collateral agent pursuant to the terms of the ING Security Agreement.
 
The ING Credit Agreement and related agreements governing the ING facility required FSFC Holdings, Inc., FSF/MP Holdings, Inc. and the Company to, among other things (i) make representations and warranties regarding the collateral as well as each of the Company’s businesses, (ii) agree to certain indemnification obligations, and (iii) agree to comply with various affirmative and negative covenants and other customary requirements for similar credit facilities. The ING facility documents also include usual and customary default provisions such as the failure to make timely payments under the facility, the occurrence of a change in control, and the failure by the Company to materially perform under the ING Credit Agreement and related


S-84


Table of Contents

FIFTH STREET FINANCE CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
agreements governing the facility, which, if not complied with, could accelerate repayment under the facility, thereby materially and adversely affecting the Company’s liquidity, financial condition and results of operations. The Company is currently in compliance with all financial covenants under the ING facility.
 
Each loan or letter of credit originated under the ING facility is subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions. The Company cannot be assured that it will be able to borrow funds under the ING facility at any particular time or at all.
 
As of March 31, 2011, the Company had $74.0 million of borrowings outstanding under the ING facility.
 
As of March 31, 2011, except for assets that were funded through the Company’s SBIC subsidiary, substantially all of the Company’s assets were pledged as collateral under the Wells Fargo facility or the ING facility.
 
Interest expense for the three and six months ended March 31, 2011 was $2.7 million and $4.7 million, respectively. Interest expense for the three and six months ended March 31, 2010 was $0.3 million and $0.4 million, respectively.
 
Note 7.   Interest and Dividend Income
 
Interest income is recorded on an accrual basis to the extent that such amounts are expected to be collected. In accordance with the Company’s policy, accrued interest is evaluated periodically for collectability. The Company stops accruing interest on investments when it is determined that interest is no longer collectible. Distributions from portfolio companies are recorded as dividend income when the distribution is received.
 
The Company holds debt in its portfolio that contains a PIK interest provision. The PIK interest, which represents contractually deferred interest added to the loan balance that is generally due at the end of the loan term, is generally recorded on the accrual basis to the extent such amounts are expected to be collected. The Company generally ceases accruing PIK interest if there is insufficient value to support the accrual or if the Company does not expect the portfolio company to be able to pay all principal and interest due. The Company’s decision to cease accruing PIK interest involves subjective judgments and determinations based on available information about a particular portfolio company, including whether the portfolio company is current with respect to its payment of principal and interest on its loans and debt securities; monthly and quarterly financial statements and financial projections for the portfolio company; the Company’s assessment of the portfolio company’s business development success, including product development, profitability and the portfolio company’s overall adherence to its business plan; information obtained by the Company in connection with periodic formal update interviews with the portfolio company’s management and, if appropriate, the private equity sponsor; and information about the general economic and market conditions in which the portfolio company operates. Based on this and other information, the Company determines whether to cease accruing PIK interest on a loan or debt security. The Company’s determination to cease accruing PIK interest on a loan or debt security is generally made well before the Company’s full write-down of such loan or debt security.


S-85


Table of Contents

FIFTH STREET FINANCE CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
Accumulated PIK interest activity for the six months ended March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010 was as follows:
 
                 
    Six Months
    Six Months
 
    Ended
    Ended
 
    March 31, 2011     March 31, 2010  
 
PIK balance at beginning of period
  $ 19,300,954     $ 12,059,478  
Gross PIK interest accrued
    7,001,665       5,187,143  
PIK income reserves
    (386,574 )     (920,196 )
PIK interest received in cash
    (6,711,111 )     (635,194 )
Adjustments due to loan exits
    (316,258 )     (1,143,830 )
                 
PIK balance at end of period
  $ 18,888,676     $ 14,547,401  
                 
 
As of March 31, 2011, the Company had stopped accruing cash interest, PIK interest and original issue discount (“OID”) on three investments that did not pay all of their scheduled cash interest payments for the period ended March 31, 2011. As of March 31, 2010, the Company had stopped accruing PIK interest and OID on four investments, including two investments that had not paid all of their scheduled cash interest payments.
 
The non-accrual status of the Company’s portfolio investments as of March 31, 2011, September 30, 2010 and March 31, 2010 was as follows:
 
             
    March 31, 2011   September 30, 2010   March 31, 2010
 
Lighting by Gregory, LLC
  Cash non-accrual   Cash non-accrual   Cash non-accrual
Martini Park, LLC
      PIK non-accrual
Nicos Polymers & Grinding, Inc. 
    Cash non-accrual   PIK non-accrual
MK Network, LLC
  Cash non-accrual   Cash non-accrual  
Premier Trailer Leasing, Inc. 
  Cash non-accrual   Cash non-accrual   Cash non-accrual
Vanguard Vinyl, Inc. 
    Cash non-accrual  
 
Income non-accrual amounts for the three and six months ended March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010 were as follows:
 
                                 
    Three Months
    Three Months
    Six Months
    Six Months
 
    Ended
    Ended
    Ended
    Ended
 
    March 31, 2011     March 31, 2010     March 31, 2011     March 31, 2010  
 
Cash interest income
  $ 1,460,163     $ 1,311,024     $ 3,566,595     $ 2,445,588  
PIK interest income
    146,184       451,313       386,574       920,196  
OID income
    30,138       103,911       60,276       207,822  
                                 
Total
  $ 1,636,485     $ 1,866,248     $ 4,013,445     $ 3,573,606  
                                 
 
Note 8.   Taxable/Distributable Income and Dividend Distributions
 
Taxable income differs from net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations primarily due to: (1) unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments, as investment gains and losses are not included in taxable income until they are realized; (2) origination fees received in connection with investments in portfolio companies, which are amortized into interest income over the life of the investment for book purposes, are treated as taxable income upon receipt; (3) organizational and deferred offering costs; (4) recognition of interest income on certain loans; and (5) income or loss recognition on exited investments.


S-86


Table of Contents

FIFTH STREET FINANCE CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
At September 30, 2010, the Company has a net loss carryforward of $1.5 million to offset net capital gains, to the extent provided by federal tax law. The capital loss carryforward will expire in the Company’s tax year ending September 30, 2017. During the year ended September 30, 2010, the Company realized capital losses from the sale of investments after October 31 and prior to year end (“post-October capital losses”) of $12.9 million, which for tax purposes are treated as arising on the first day of the following year.
 
Listed below is a reconciliation of “net increase in net assets resulting from operations” to taxable income for the three and six months ended March 31, 2011:
 
                 
    Three Months
    Six Months
 
    Ended
    Ended
 
    March 31, 2011     March 31, 2011  
 
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations
  $ 15,671,000     $ 33,119,000  
Net change in unrealized (appreciation) depreciation
    372,000       (16,470,000 )
Book/tax difference due to deferred loan origination fees, net
    3,114,000       6,592,000  
Book/tax difference due to organizational and deferred offering costs
    (22,000 )     (43,000 )
Book/tax difference due to interest income on certain loans
    675,000       1,726,000  
Book/tax difference due to capital losses not recognized
    513,000       13,963,000  
Other book-tax differences
    (8,000 )     121,000  
                 
Taxable/Distributable Income(1)
  $ 20,315,000     $ 39,008,000  
                 
 
 
(1) The Company’s taxable income for 2011 is an estimate and will not be finally determined until the Company files its tax return for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011. Therefore, the final taxable income may be different than the estimate.
 
Distributions to stockholders are recorded on the record date. The Company is required to distribute annually to its stockholders at least 90% of its net ordinary income and net realized short-term capital gains in excess of net realized long-term capital losses for each taxable year in order to be eligible for the tax benefits allowed to a RIC under Subchapter M of the Code. The Company anticipates paying out as a dividend all or substantially all of those amounts. The amount to be paid out as a dividend is determined by the Board of Directors and is based on management’s estimate of the Company’s annual taxable income. The Company maintains an “opt out” dividend reinvestment plan for its stockholders.


S-87


Table of Contents

FIFTH STREET FINANCE CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
To date, the Company’s Board of Directors declared the following distributions:
 
                                 
    Date
  Record
  Payment
  Amount
Dividend Type
  Declared   Date   Date   per Share
 
Quarterly
    5/1/2008       5/19/2008       6/3/2008     $ 0.30  
Quarterly
    8/6/2008       9/10/2008       9/26/2008     $ 0.31  
Quarterly
    12/9/2008       12/19/2008       12/29/2008     $ 0.32  
Quarterly
    12/9/2008       12/30/2008       1/29/2009     $ 0.33  
Special
    12/18/2008       12/30/2008       1/29/2009     $ 0.05  
Quarterly
    4/14/2009       5/26/2009       6/25/2009     $ 0.25  
Quarterly
    8/3/2009       9/8/2009       9/25/2009     $ 0.25  
Quarterly
    11/12/2009       12/10/2009       12/29/2009     $ 0.27  
Quarterly
    1/12/2010       3/3/2010       3/30/2010     $ 0.30  
Quarterly
    5/3/2010       5/20/2010       6/30/2010     $ 0.32  
Quarterly
    8/2/2010       9/1/2010       9/29/2010     $ 0.10  
Monthly
    8/2/2010       10/6/2010       10/27/2010     $ 0.10  
Monthly
    8/2/2010       11/3/2010       11/24/2010     $ 0.11  
Monthly
    8/2/2010       12/1/2010       12/29/2010     $ 0.11  
Monthly
    11/30/2010       1/4/2011       1/31/2011     $ 0.1066  
Monthly
    11/30/2010       2/1/2011       2/28/2011     $ 0.1066  
Monthly
    11/30/2010       3/1/2011       3/31/2011     $ 0.1066  
Monthly
    1/30/2011       4/1/2011       4/29/2011     $ 0.1066  
Monthly
    1/30/2011       5/2/2011       5/31/2011     $ 0.1066  
Monthly
    1/30/2011       6/1/2011       6/30/2011     $ 0.1066  
 
For income tax purposes, the Company estimates that its distributions will be composed entirely of ordinary income, and will be reflected as such on the Form 1099-DIV for the calendar year 2011. The Company anticipates declaring further distributions to its stockholders to meet the RIC distribution requirements.
 
As a RIC, the Company is also subject to a federal excise tax based on distributive requirements of its taxable income on a calendar year basis. Because the Company did not satisfy these distribution requirements for calendar years 2008, 2009 and 2010 the Company incurred a de minimis federal excise tax for those calendar years.
 
Note 9.   Realized Gains or Losses from Investments and Net Change in Unrealized Appreciation or Depreciation from Investments
 
Realized gains or losses are measured by the difference between the net proceeds from the sale or redemption and the cost basis of the investment without regard to unrealized appreciation or depreciation previously recognized, and includes investments written-off during the period, net of recoveries. Realized losses may also be recorded in connection with the Company’s determination that certain investments are considered worthless securities and/or meet the conditions for loss recognition per the applicable tax rules. Net change in unrealized appreciation or depreciation from investments reflects the net change in the valuation of the portfolio pursuant to the Company’s valuation guidelines and the reclassification of any prior period unrealized appreciation or depreciation on exited investments.


S-88


Table of Contents

FIFTH STREET FINANCE CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
During the six months ended March 31, 2011, the Company recorded investment realization events, including the following:
 
  •  In October 2010, the Company received a cash payment of $8.7 million from Goldco, Inc. in full satisfaction of all obligations under the loan agreement. The debt investment was exited at par and no realized gain or loss was recorded on this transaction;
 
  •  In November 2010, the Company received a cash payment of $11.0 million from TBA Global, LLC in full satisfaction of all obligations under the loan agreement. The debt investment was exited at par and no realized gain or loss was recorded on this transaction;
 
  •  In November 2010, the Company restructured its investment in Vanguard Vinyl, Inc. The restructuring resulted in a material modification of the terms of the loan agreement. As such, the Company recorded a realized loss in the amount of $1.7 million in accordance with ASC 470-50;
 
  •  In December 2010, the Company restructured its investment in Nicos Polymers & Grinding, Inc. The restructuring resulted in a material modification of the terms of the loan agreement. As such, the Company recorded a realized loss in the amount of $3.9 million in accordance with ASC 470-50;
 
  •  In December 2010, the Company received a cash payment of $25.3 million from Boot Barn in full satisfaction of all obligations under the loan agreement. The debt investment was exited at par and no realized gain or loss was recorded on this transaction;
 
  •  In December 2010, the Company received a cash payment of $11.7 million from Western Emulsions, Inc. in partial satisfaction of the obligations under the loan agreement. No realized gain or loss was recorded on this transaction;
 
  •  In December 2010, the Company restructured its investment in Lighting by Gregory, LLC. The restructuring resulted in a material modification of the terms of the loan agreement. As such, the Company recorded a realized loss in the amount of $7.8 million in accordance with ASC 470-50; and
 
  •  In March 2011, the Company received a cash payment of $5.0 million from AmBath/ReBath Holdings, Inc. as part of a restructuring of the loan agreement. The restructuring resulted in a material modification of the terms of the loan agreement. As such, the Company recorded a realized loss in the amount of $0.3 million in accordance with ASC 470-50.
 
During the six months ended March 31, 2010, the Company recorded investment realization events, including the following:
 
  •  In October 2009, the Company received a cash payment in the amount of $0.1 million representing a payment in full of all amounts due in connection with the cancellation of its loan agreement with American Hardwoods Industries, LLC. The Company recorded a $0.1 million reduction to the previously recorded $10.4 million realized loss on the investment in American Hardwoods;
 
  •  In October 2009, the Company received a cash payment of $3.9 million from Elephant & Castle, Inc. in partial satisfaction of the obligations under the loan agreement. No realized gain or loss was recorded on this transaction; and
 
  •  In March 2010, the Company recorded a realized loss in the amount of $2.9 million in connection with the sale of a portion of its investment in CPAC, Inc.
 
Note 10.   Concentration of Credit Risks
 
The Company places its cash in financial institutions and at times such balances may be in excess of the FDIC insured limit. The Company limits its exposure to credit loss by depositing its cash with high credit quality financial institutions and monitoring their financial stability.


S-89


Table of Contents

FIFTH STREET FINANCE CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
Note 11.   Related Party Transactions
 
The Company has entered into an investment advisory agreement with the Investment Adviser. Under the investment advisory agreement, the Company pays the Investment Adviser a fee for its services under the investment advisory agreement consisting of two components — a base management fee and an incentive fee.
 
Base management Fee
 
The base management fee is calculated at an annual rate of 2% of the Company’s gross assets, which includes any borrowings for investment purposes. The base management fee is payable quarterly in arrears, and will be calculated based on the value of the Company’s gross assets at the end of each fiscal quarter, and appropriately adjusted on a pro rata basis for any equity capital raises or repurchases during such quarter. The base management fee for any partial month or quarter will be appropriately prorated.
 
On January 6, 2010, the Company announced that the Investment Adviser had voluntarily agreed to take the following actions:
 
  •  To waive the portion of its base management fee for the quarter ended December 31, 2009 attributable to four new portfolio investments, as well as cash and cash equivalents. The amount of the management fee waived was $727,000; and
 
  •  To permanently waive that portion of its base management fee attributable to the Company’s assets held in the form of cash and cash equivalents as of the end of each quarter beginning March 31, 2010.
 
For purposes of the waiver, cash and cash equivalents is as defined in the notes to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.
 
For the three and six months ended March 31, 2011, the net base management fees were $4.8 million and $8.6 million, respectively. For the three and six months ended March 31, 2010, the net base management fees were $2.3 million and $3.9 million, respectively. At March 31, 2011, the Company had a liability on its Consolidated Statement of Assets and Liabilities in the amount of $4.8 million reflecting the unpaid portion of the base management fee payable to the Investment Adviser.
 
Incentive Fee
 
The incentive fee portion of the investment advisory agreement has two parts. The first part is calculated and payable quarterly in arrears based on the Company’s “Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income” for the immediately preceding fiscal quarter. For this purpose, “Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income” means interest income, dividend income and any other income (including any other fees (other than fees for providing managerial assistance), such as commitment, origination, structuring, diligence and consulting fees or other fees that the Company receives from portfolio companies) accrued during the fiscal quarter, minus the Company’s operating expenses for the quarter (including the base management fee, expenses payable under the Company’s administration agreement with FSC, Inc., and any interest expense and dividends paid on any issued and outstanding indebtedness or preferred stock, but excluding the incentive fee). Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income includes, in the case of investments with a deferred interest feature (such as original issue discount, debt instruments with PIK interest and zero coupon securities), accrued income that the Company has not yet received in cash. Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income does not include any realized capital gains, realized capital losses or unrealized capital appreciation or depreciation. Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income, expressed as a rate of return on the value of the Company’s net assets at the end of the immediately preceding fiscal quarter, will be compared to a “hurdle rate” of 2% per quarter (8% annualized), subject to a “catch-up” provision measured as of the end of each fiscal quarter. The Company’s net investment income used to calculate this part of the incentive fee is also included in the amount of its gross assets used to


S-90


Table of Contents

FIFTH STREET FINANCE CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
calculate the 2% base management fee. The operation of the incentive fee with respect to the Company’s Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income for each quarter is as follows:
 
  •  No incentive fee is payable to the Investment Adviser in any fiscal quarter in which the Company’s Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income does not exceed the hurdle rate of 2% (the “preferred return” or “hurdle”);
 
  •  100% of the Company’s Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income with respect to that portion of such Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income, if any, that exceeds the hurdle rate but is less than or equal to 2.5% in any fiscal quarter (10% annualized) is payable to the Investment Adviser. The Company refers to this portion of its Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income (which exceeds the hurdle rate but is less than or equal to 2.5%) as the “catch-up.” The “catch-up” provision is intended to provide the Investment Adviser with an incentive fee of 20% on all of the Company’s Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income as if a hurdle rate did not apply when the Company’s Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income exceeds 2.5% in any fiscal quarter; and
 
  •  20% of the amount of the Company’s Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income, if any, that exceeds 2.5% in any fiscal quarter (10% annualized) is payable to the Investment Adviser once the hurdle is reached and the catch-up is achieved (20% of all Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income thereafter is allocated to the Investment Adviser).
 
The second part of the incentive fee is determined and payable in arrears as of the end of each fiscal year (or upon termination of the investment advisory agreement, as of the termination date), commencing on September 30, 2008, and equals 20% of the Company’s realized capital gains, if any, on a cumulative basis from inception through the end of each fiscal year, computed net of all realized capital losses and unrealized capital depreciation on a cumulative basis, less the aggregate amount of any previously paid capital gain incentive fees.
 
GAAP requires the Company to accrue for the theoretical capital gains incentive fee that would be payable after giving effect to the net realized and unrealized capital appreciation and depreciation. It should be noted that a fee so calculated and accrued would not necessarily be payable under the Investment Advisory Agreement, and may never be paid based upon the computation of capital gains incentive fees in subsequent periods. Amounts ultimately paid under the Investment Advisory Agreement will be consistent with the formula reflected in the Investment Advisory Agreement.
 
The Company does not currently accrue for capital gains incentive fees due to the accumulated realized and unrealized losses in the portfolio.
 
For the three and six months ended March 31, 2011, incentive fees were $4.1 million and $7.7 million, respectively. For the three and six months ended March 31, 2010, incentive fees were $2.8 million and $4.9 million, respectively, and were comprised solely of incentive fees related to the Company’s Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income. At March 31, 2011, the Company had a liability on its Consolidated Statement of Assets and Liabilities in the amount of $4.1 million reflecting the unpaid portion of the incentive fee payable to the Investment Adviser.
 
Indemnification
 
The investment advisory agreement provides that, absent willful misfeasance, bad faith or gross negligence in the performance of their respective duties or by reason of the reckless disregard of their respective duties and obligations, the Company’s Investment Adviser and its officers, managers, agents, employees, controlling persons, members (or their owners) and any other person or entity affiliated with it, are entitled to indemnification from the Company for any damages, liabilities, costs and expenses (including reasonable attorneys’ fees and amounts reasonably paid in settlement) arising from the rendering of the


S-91


Table of Contents

FIFTH STREET FINANCE CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
Investment Adviser’s services under the investment advisory agreement or otherwise as the Company’s Investment Adviser.
 
Administration Agreement
 
The Company has also entered into an administration agreement with FSC, Inc. under which FSC, Inc. provides administrative services for the Company, including office facilities and equipment, and clerical, bookkeeping and recordkeeping services at such facilities. Under the administration agreement, FSC, Inc. also performs or oversees the performance of the Company’s required administrative services, which includes being responsible for the financial records which the Company is required to maintain and preparing reports to the Company’s stockholders and reports filed with the SEC. In addition, FSC, Inc. assists the Company in determining and publishing the Company’s net asset value, overseeing the preparation and filing of the Company’s tax returns and the printing and dissemination of reports to the Company’s stockholders, and generally overseeing the payment of the Company’s expenses and the performance of administrative and professional services rendered to the Company by others. For providing these services, facilities and personnel, the Company reimburses FSC, Inc. the allocable portion of overhead and other expenses incurred by FSC, Inc. in performing its obligations under the administration agreement, including rent and the Company’s allocable portion of the costs of compensation and related expenses of the Company’s chief financial officer and chief compliance officer and their staffs. FSC, Inc. has voluntarily determined to forgo receiving reimbursement for the services performed for the Company by its chief compliance officer. However, although FSC, Inc. currently intends to forgo its right to receive such reimbursement, it is under no obligation to do so and may cease to do so at any time in the future. FSC, Inc. may also provide, on the Company’s behalf, managerial assistance to the Company’s portfolio companies. The administration agreement may be terminated by either party without penalty upon 60 days’ written notice to the other party.
 
For the three and six months ended March 31, 2011, the Company accrued administrative expenses of $0.6 million, including $0.2 million of general and administration expenses, and $1.3 million, including $0.6 million of general and administration expenses, that are due to FSC, Inc., respectively. At March 31, 2011, $0.8 million was included in Due to FSC, Inc. in the Consolidated Statement of Assets and Liabilities.


S-92


Table of Contents

FIFTH STREET FINANCE CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
Note 12.  Financial Highlights
 
                                 
    Three Months
  Three Months
  Six Months
  Six Months
    Ended
  Ended
  Ended
  Ended
Per Share Data:
  March 31, 2011   March 31, 2010   March 31, 2011   March 31, 2010
 
Net asset value at beginning of period
  $ 10.44     $ 10.82     $ 10.43     $ 10.84  
Net investment income
    0.27       0.26       0.52       0.48  
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments and interest rate swap
    (0.01 )     0.03       0.28       0.06  
Net realized loss on investments
    (0.01 )     (0.07 )     (0.24 )     (0.07 )
Dividends declared
    (0.30 )     (0.30 )     (0.62 )     (0.57 )
Issuance of common stock
    0.29       (0.04 )     0.31       (0.04 )
Net asset value at end of period
  $ 10.68     $ 10.70     $ 10.68     $ 10.70  
Per share market value at beginning of period
  $ 12.14     $ 10.74     $ 11.14     $ 10.93  
Per share market value at end of period
  $ 13.35     $ 11.61     $ 13.35     $ 11.61  
Total return(1)
    12.61 %     10.89 %     26.04 %     11.44 %
Common shares outstanding at beginning of period
    55,059,057       37,923,407       54,550,290       37,878,987  
Common shares outstanding at end of period
    66,667,933       45,282,596       66,667,933       45,282,596  
Net assets at beginning of period
  $ 574,919,813     $ 410,257,351     $ 569,172,105     $ 410,556,071  
Net assets at end of period
  $ 711,748,097     $ 484,397,005     $ 711,748,097     $ 484,397,005  
Average net assets(2)
  $ 662,783,066     $ 456,501,106     $ 616,969,193     $ 432,914,471  
Ratio of net investment income to average net assets(3)
    10.13 %     9.96 %     9.95 %     9.06 %
Ratio of total expenses to average net assets(3)
    8.04 %     5.91 %     7.94 %     5.35 %
Ratio of portfolio turnover to average investments at fair value
    0.00 %     1.00 %     1.88 %     1.18 %
Weighted average outstanding debt(4)
  $ 224,511,111     $ 11,928,015     $ 162,925,275     $ 6,151,216  
Average debt per share
  $ 3.61     $ 0.28     $ 2.79     $ 0.15  
 
 
(1) Total return equals the increase or decrease of ending market value over beginning market value, plus distributions, divided by the beginning market value, assuming dividend reinvestment prices obtained under the Company’s dividend reinvestment plan. Total return is not annualized.
 
(2) Calculated based upon the daily weighted average net assets for the period.
 
(3) Interim periods are annualized.
 
(4) Calculated based upon the daily weighted average of loans payable for the period.
 
Note 13.   Preferred Stock
 
The Company’s restated certificate of incorporation had not authorized any shares of preferred stock. However, on April 4, 2008, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a certificate of amendment to its restated certificate of incorporation reclassifying 200,000 shares of its common stock as shares of non-convertible, non-participating preferred stock, with a par value of $0.01 and a liquidation preference of $500 per share (“Series A Preferred Stock”) and authorizing the issuance of up to 200,000 shares of Series A


S-93


Table of Contents

FIFTH STREET FINANCE CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
Preferred Stock. A certificate of amendment was also approved by the holders of a majority of the shares of the Company’s outstanding common stock through a written consent first solicited on April 7, 2008.
 
On April 20, 2010, at the Company’s 2010 Annual Meeting, the Company’s stockholders approved, among other things, an amendment to the Company’s restated certificate of incorporation to remove the Company’s authority to issue shares of Series A Preferred Stock.
 
Note 14.   Interest Rate Swaps
 
In August 2010, the Company entered into a three-year interest rate swap agreement to mitigate its exposure to adverse fluctuations in interest rates for a total notional amount of $100.0 million. Under the interest rate swap agreement, the Company will pay a fixed interest rate of 0.99% and receive a floating rate based on the prevailing one-month LIBOR, which as of March 31, 2011 was 0.24%. For the three and six months ended March 31, 2011, the Company recorded $0.2 million and $1.0 million, respectively, of unrealized appreciation related to this swap agreement. As of March 31, 2011, this swap agreement had a fair value of $0.2 million which is included in “collateral posted to bank and other assets” in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Assets and Liabilities.
 
As of March 31, 2011, the Company posted $1.5 million of cash as collateral with respect to the interest rate swap. The Company is restricted in terms of access to this collateral until such swap is terminated or the swap agreement expires. Cash collateral posted is held in an account at Wells Fargo.
 
Swaps contain varying degrees of off-balance sheet risk which could result from changes in the market values of underlying assets, indices or interest rates and similar items. As a result, the amounts recognized in the Consolidated Statement of Assets and Liabilities at any given date may not reflect the total amount of potential losses that the Company could ultimately incur.
 
Note 15.   Subsequent Events
 
On April 12, 2011, the Company closed a private offering of $150 million aggregate principal amount of its 5.375% convertible senior notes due 2016. These convertible senior notes were sold only to qualified institutional buyers (as defined in the Securities Act) pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act. The Company has granted the initial purchasers for the offering the option, which expires May 7, 2011, to purchase up to an additional $22.5 million aggregate principal amount of the convertible senior notes. In addition, Leonard M. Tannenbaum, the Company’s chief executive officer, purchased $2 million principal amount of the convertible senior notes directly from the Company in a private placement.
 
The convertible senior notes are unsecured and bear interest at a rate of 5.375% per year, payable semiannually. In certain circumstances, the convertible senior notes are convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at an initial conversion rate of 67.7415 shares of common stock per $1,000 principal amount of convertible senior notes, which is equivalent to an initial conversion price of approximately $14.76 per share of common stock, subject to customary anti-dilution adjustments. In addition, if certain corporate events occur in respect of the Company, holders of the convertible senior notes may require the Company to repurchase for cash all or part of their convertible senior notes at a repurchase price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the convertible senior notes to be repurchased, plus accrued and unpaid interest through, but excluding, the required repurchase date. The Company does not have the right to redeem the convertible senior notes prior to maturity. The convertible senior notes will mature on April 1, 2016, unless repurchased or converted in accordance with their terms prior to such date.


S-94


Table of Contents

 
$500,000,000
 
Fifth Street Finance Corp.
Common Stock
 
We may offer, from time to time, up to $500,000,000 of shares of our common stock in one or more offerings. Our common stock may be offered at prices and on terms to be disclosed in one or more supplements to this prospectus. You should read this prospectus and the applicable prospectus supplement carefully before you invest in our common stock.
 
The offering price per share of our common stock, less any underwriting commissions and discounts or agency fees, will not be less than the net asset value per share of our common stock at the time of the offering.
 
Our common stock may be offered directly to one or more purchasers through agents designated from time to time by us, or to or through underwriters or dealers. The prospectus supplement relating to the offering will identify any agents or underwriters involved in the sale of our common stock, and will disclose any applicable purchase price, fee, commission or discount arrangement between us and our agents or underwriters or among our underwriters or the basis upon which such amount may be calculated. See “Plan of Distribution.” We may not sell any of our common stock through agents, underwriters or dealers without delivery of a prospectus supplement describing the method and terms of the offering of such common stock.
 
We are a specialty finance company that lends to and invests in small and mid-sized companies in connection with investments by private equity sponsors. Our investment objective is to maximize our portfolio’s total return by generating current income from our debt investments and capital appreciation from our equity investments.
 
We are an externally managed, closed-end, non-diversified management investment company that has elected to be regulated as a business development company under the Investment Company Act of 1940.
 
Our common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “FSC.” On March 28, 2011, and December 31, 2010, the last reported sale price of our common stock on the New York Stock Exchange was $13.37 and $12.14, respectively. We are required to determine the net asset value per share of our common stock on a quarterly basis. Our net asset value per share of our common stock as of December 31, 2010 was $10.44.
 
Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk, and should be considered highly speculative. See “Risk Factors” beginning on page 12 to read about factors you should consider, including the risk of leverage, before investing in our common stock.
 
This prospectus and any accompanying prospectus supplement contain important information about us that a prospective investor should know before investing in our common stock. Please read this prospectus and any accompanying prospectus supplement before investing and keep them for future reference. We file periodic reports, current reports, proxy statements and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission. This information is available free of charge by contacting us at 10 Bank Street, 12th Floor, White Plains, NY 10606 or by telephone at (914) 286-6800 or on our website at www.fifthstreetfinance.com. Information contained on our website is not incorporated by reference into this prospectus, and you should not consider that information to be part of this prospectus. The Securities and Exchange Commission also maintains a website at www.sec.gov that contains such information.
 
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of these securities or determined if this prospectus is truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
 
Prospectus dated March 31, 2011


 

 
TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
         
    1  
    5  
    9  
    11  
    12  
    28  
    29  
    30  
    32  
    57  
    69  
    74  
    84  
    86  
    93  
    93  
    94  
    95  
    97  
    98  
    101  
    109  
    114  
    115  
    115  
    115  
    115  
    115  
    116  
    116  
    F-1  
 
 
 
 
ABOUT THIS PROSPECTUS
 
This prospectus is part of a registration statement that we have filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, using the “shelf” registration process. Under the shelf registration process, we may offer, from time to time, up to $500,000,000 of shares of our common stock on terms to be determined at the time of the offering. This prospectus provides you with a general description of the common stock that we may offer. Each time we use this prospectus to offer common stock, we will provide a prospectus supplement that will contain specific information about the terms of that offering. The prospectus supplement may also add, update or change information contained in this prospectus. Please carefully read this prospectus and any accompanying prospectus supplement together with the additional information described under “Available Information” and “Risk Factors” before you make an investment decision.


i


Table of Contents

No dealer, salesperson or other person is authorized to give any information or to represent anything not contained in this prospectus or any accompanying supplement to this prospectus. You must not rely on any unauthorized information or representations not contained in this prospectus or any accompanying prospectus supplement as if we had authorized it. This prospectus and any accompanying prospectus supplement do not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of any offer to buy any security other than the registered securities to which they relate, nor do they constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any securities in any jurisdiction to any person to whom it is unlawful to make such an offer or solicitation in such jurisdiction. The information contained in this prospectus and any accompanying prospectus supplement is accurate as of the dates on their covers. Our financial condition, results of operations and prospects may have changed since that date. To the extent required by law, we will amend or supplement the information contained in this prospectus and any accompanying prospectus supplement to reflect any material changes to such information subsequent to the date of the prospectus and any accompanying prospectus supplement and prior to the completion of any offering pursuant to the prospectus and any accompanying prospectus supplement.


ii


Table of Contents

 
PROSPECTUS SUMMARY
 
This summary highlights some of the information in this prospectus. It is not complete and may not contain all of the information that you may want to consider. You should read the entire prospectus carefully, including the section entitled “Risk Factors” before making a decision to invest in our common stock.
 
We commenced operations on February 15, 2007 as Fifth Street Mezzanine Partners III, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership. Effective as of January 2, 2008, Fifth Street Mezzanine Partners III, L.P. merged with and into Fifth Street Finance Corp., a Delaware corporation. Unless otherwise noted, the terms “we,” “us,” “our” and “Fifth Street” refer to Fifth Street Mezzanine Partners III, L.P. prior to the merger date and Fifth Street Finance Corp. on and after the merger date. In addition, the terms “Fifth Street Management” and “investment adviser” refer to Fifth Street Management LLC, our external investment adviser.
 
Fifth Street Finance Corp.
 
We are a specialty finance company that lends to and invests in small and mid-sized companies in connection with investments by private equity sponsors. We define small and mid-sized companies as those with annual revenues between $25 million and $250 million. Our investment objective is to maximize our portfolio’s total return by generating current income from our debt investments and capital appreciation from our equity investments. We are externally managed and advised by Fifth Street Management LLC, which we also refer to as our “investment adviser.”
 
As of December 31, 2010, we had originated $907.5 million of funded debt and equity investments and our portfolio totaled $742.4 million at fair value and was comprised of 45 investments, 41 of which were in operating companies and four of which were in private equity funds. The four investments in private equity funds represented less than 1% of the fair value of our assets at December 31, 2010. The 38 debt investments in our portfolio as of December 31, 2010 had a weighted average debt to EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization) multiple of 3.24x calculated at the time of origination of the investment. The weighted average annual yield of our debt investments as of December 31, 2010 was approximately 13.2%, of which 11.4% represented cash payments and 1.8% represented payment-in-kind, or PIK, interest. PIK interest represents contractually deferred interest added to the loan balance that is generally due at the end of the loan term and recorded as interest income on an accrual basis to the extent such amounts are expected to be collected. For additional information regarding PIK interest and related risks, see “Risk Factors — Risks Relating to Our Business and Structure — Our incentive fee may induce our investment adviser to make speculative investments” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Critical Accounting Policies — Revenue Recognition — Payment-in-Kind (PIK) Interest.”
 
Our investments generally range in size from $5 million to $75 million and are principally in the form of first and second lien debt investments, which may also include an equity component. We are currently focusing our origination efforts on first lien loans. We believe that the risk-adjusted returns from these loans are superior to second lien investments and offer superior credit quality. However, we may choose to originate additional second lien and unsecured loans in the future. As of December 31, 2010, substantially all of our debt investments were secured by first or second priority liens on the assets of our portfolio companies. Moreover, we held equity investments consisting of common stock, preferred stock, or other equity interests in 21 out of 45 portfolio companies as of December 31, 2010.
 
We are an externally managed, closed-end, non-diversified management investment company that has elected to be regulated as a business development company, or “BDC,” under the Investment Company Act of 1940, or the “1940 Act.” As a business development company, we are required to comply with regulatory requirements, including limitations on our use of debt. We are permitted to, and expect to continue to, finance our investments through borrowings. However, as a business development company, we are only generally allowed to borrow amounts such that our asset coverage, as defined in the 1940 Act, equals at least 200% after such borrowing. The amount of leverage that we employ will depend on our assessment of market conditions and other factors at the time of any proposed borrowing. See “Regulation — Business Development Company Regulations.”


1


Table of Contents

We have also elected to be treated for federal income tax purposes as a regulated investment company, or RIC, under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code, or the “Code.” See “Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations.” As a RIC, we generally will not have to pay corporate-level federal income taxes on any net ordinary income or capital gains that we distribute to our stockholders if we meet certain source-of-income, income distribution and asset diversification requirements.
 
In addition, we have a wholly-owned subsidiary that is licensed as a small business investment company, or SBIC, and regulated by the Small Business Administration, or the “SBA.” See “Regulation — Small Business Investment Company Regulations.” The SBIC license allows us, through our wholly-owned subsidiary, to issue SBA-guaranteed debentures. We have received exemptive relief from the Securities and Exchange Commission, or “SEC,” to permit us to exclude the debt of our SBIC subsidiary guaranteed by the SBA from the definition of senior securities in the 200% asset coverage ratio we are required to maintain under the 1940 Act. Pursuant to the 200% asset coverage ratio limitation, we are permitted to borrow one dollar for every dollar we have in assets less all liabilities and indebtedness not represented by debt securities issued by us or loans obtained by us. For example, as of December 31, 2010, we had approximately $663.9 million in assets less all liabilities and indebtedness not represented by debt securities issued by us or loans obtained by us, which would permit us to borrow up to approximately $663.9 million, notwithstanding other limitations on our borrowings pursuant to our credit facilities.
 
As a result of our receipt of an exemption from the SEC for our SBA debt, we have increased capacity to fund up to $150 million (the maximum amount of SBA-guaranteed debentures an SBIC may currently have outstanding once certain conditions have been met) of investments with SBA-guaranteed debentures in addition to being able to fund investments with borrowings up to the maximum amount of debt that the 200% asset coverage ratio limitation would allow us to incur. As a result, we, in effect, are permitted to have a lower asset coverage ratio than the 200% asset coverage ratio limitation under the 1940 Act and, therefore, we can have more debt outstanding than assets to cover such debt. For example, we are able to borrow up to $150 million more than the approximately $663.9 million permitted under the 200% asset coverage ratio limit as of December 31, 2010. For additional information on SBA regulations that affect our access to SBA-guaranteed debentures, see “Risk Factors — Risks Relating to Our Business and Structure — Our SBIC subsidiary’s investment adviser has no prior experience managing an SBIC and any failure to comply with SBA regulations, resulting from our SBIC subsidiary’s investment adviser’s lack of experience or otherwise, could have a material adverse effect on our operations.” As of March 31, 2011, we, through our SBIC subsidiary, had a total of $138.3 million of SBA-guaranteed debentures outstanding.
 
The Investment Adviser
 
Our investment adviser is affiliated with Fifth Street Capital LLC, a private investment firm founded and managed by Leonard M. Tannenbaum who has led the investment of over $1.4 billion in small and mid-sized companies, including the investments made by us, since 1998. Mr. Tannenbaum and his respective private investment firms have acted as the lead (and often sole) first or second lien investor in over 80 investment transactions. The other investment funds managed by these private investment firms generally are fully committed and, other than follow-on investments in existing portfolio companies, are no longer making investments.
 
We benefit from our investment adviser’s ability to identify attractive investment opportunities, conduct diligence on and value prospective investments, negotiate investments and manage a diversified portfolio of those investments. The principals of our investment adviser have broad investment backgrounds, with prior experience at investment funds, investment banks and other financial services companies and have developed a broad network of contacts within the private equity community. This network of contacts provides our principal source of investment opportunities.
 
The principals of our investment adviser are Mr. Tannenbaum, our chief executive officer and our investment adviser’s managing partner, Bernard D. Berman, our president, chief compliance officer and secretary and a partner of our investment adviser, Ivelin M. Dimitrov, our co-chief investment officer and a partner of our investment adviser, Chad Blakeman, our co-chief investment officer, Juan E. Alva, a partner of our investment adviser, Casey J. Zmijeski, a partner of our investment adviser and William H. Craig, our chief financial officer.


2


Table of Contents

Business Strategy
 
Our investment objective is to maximize our portfolio’s total return by generating current income from our debt investments and capital appreciation from our equity investments. We have adopted the following business strategy to achieve our investment objective:
 
  •  Capitalize on our investment adviser’s strong relationships with private equity sponsors.  Our investment adviser has developed an extensive network of relationships with private equity sponsors that invest in small and mid-sized companies. We believe that the strength of these relationships is due to a common investment philosophy, a consistent market focus, a rigorous approach to diligence and a reputation for delivering on commitments. In addition to being our principal source of originations, we believe that private equity sponsors provide significant benefits including incremental due diligence, additional monitoring capabilities and a potential source of capital and operational expertise for our portfolio companies.
 
  •  Focus on established small and mid-sized companies.  We believe that there are fewer finance companies focused on transactions involving small and mid-sized companies than larger companies, and that this is one factor that allows us to negotiate favorable investment terms. Such favorable terms include higher debt yields and lower leverage levels, more significant covenant protection and greater equity grants than typical of transactions involving larger companies. We generally invest in companies with established market positions, seasoned management teams, proven products and services and strong regional or national operations. We believe that these companies possess better risk-adjusted return profiles than newer companies that are building management or in early stages of building a revenue base.
 
  •  Continue our growth of direct originations.  As of December 31, 2010, we directly originated 100% of our debt investments, although we may not directly originate 100% of our investments in the future. Over the last several years, the principals of our investment adviser have developed an origination strategy designed to ensure that the number and quality of our investment opportunities allows us to continue to directly originate substantially all of our investments. We believe that the benefits of direct originations include, among other things, our ability to control the structuring of investment protections and to generate origination and exit fees.
 
  •  Employ disciplined underwriting policies and rigorous portfolio management.  Our investment adviser has developed an extensive underwriting process which includes a review of the prospects, competitive position, financial performance and industry dynamics of each potential portfolio company. In addition, we perform substantial diligence on potential investments, and seek to invest along side private equity sponsors who have proven capabilities in building value. As part of the monitoring process, our investment adviser will analyze monthly and quarterly financial statements versus the previous periods and year, review financial projections, meet with management, attend board meetings and review all compliance certificates and covenants.
 
  •  Structure our debt investments to minimize risk of loss and achieve attractive risk-adjusted returns.  We structure our debt investments on a conservative basis with high cash yields, cash origination fees, low leverage levels and strong investment protections. As of December 31, 2010, the weighted average annualized yield of our debt investments was approximately 13.2%, which includes a cash component of 11.4%. Our debt investments have strong protections, including default penalties, information rights, board observation rights, and affirmative, negative and financial covenants, such as lien protection and prohibitions against change of control. We believe these protections, coupled with the other features of our investments described above, should allow us to reduce our risk of capital loss and achieve attractive risk adjusted returns; however, there can be no assurance that we will be able to successfully structure our investments to minimize risk of loss and achieve attractive risk-adjusted returns.
 
  •  Benefit from lower, fixed, long-term cost of capital.  The SBIC license held by our wholly-owned subsidiary allows it to issue SBA-guaranteed debentures. SBA-guaranteed debentures carry long-term fixed rates that are generally lower than rates on comparable bank and other debt. Because we expect lower cost SBA leverage to become a more significant part of our capital base through our SBIC subsidiary, our relative cost of debt capital may be lower than many of our competitors. In addition, the SBIC leverage that we receive


3


Table of Contents

  through our SBIC subsidiary represents a stable, long-term component of our capital structure that should permit the proper matching of duration and cost compared to our portfolio investments.
 
  •  Leverage the skills and experience of our investment adviser.  The principals of our investment adviser have broad investment backgrounds, with prior experience at private investment funds, investment banks and other financial services companies and they also have experience managing distressed companies. We believe that our investment adviser’s expertise in valuing, structuring, negotiating and closing transactions provides us with a competitive advantage by allowing us to provide financing solutions that meet the needs of our portfolio companies while adhering to our underwriting standards.
 
Corporate Information
 
Our principal executive offices are located at 10 Bank Street, 12th Floor, White Plains, NY 10606 and our telephone number is (914) 286-6800. We maintain a website on the Internet at www.fifthstreetfinance.com. Information contained on our website is not incorporated by reference into this prospectus, and you should not consider that information to be part of this prospectus.
 
Recent Developments
 
On February 4, 2011, we completed a follow-on public offering of 11,500,000 shares of our common stock, which included the underwriters’ exercise of their over-allotment option, at the offering price of $12.65 per share.
 
On February 24, 2011, we amended our secured credit facility led by ING Capital LLC (the “ING facility”) to expand our borrowing capacity to $215 million. In addition, the ING facility’s accordion feature was increased to allow for potential future expansion up to a total of $300 million, the maturity date was extended to February 22, 2014, and, if we obtain a credit rating of BBB or the equivalent, the interest rate will be reduced from LIBOR plus 3.5% per annum to LIBOR plus 3.0% per annum, in each case, with no minimum interest rate, or “floor,” payable thereunder. As of March 31, 2011, we had $74.0 million of borrowings outstanding under the ING facility.
 
On February 28, 2011, we amended our $100 million secured credit facility with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the “Wells Fargo facility”) to reduce our interest rate to LIBOR plus 3.0% per annum, with no LIBOR floor, and extend the maturity date of the facility to February 25, 2014. As of March 31, 2011, there was $60.0 million of borrowings outstanding under the Wells Fargo facility.


4


Table of Contents

 
THE OFFERING
 
We may offer, from time to time, up to $500,000,000 of shares of our common stock, on terms to be determined at the time of the offering. Our common stock may be offered at prices and on terms to be disclosed in one or more prospectus supplements. The offering price per share of our common stock, less any underwriting commissions and discounts or agency fees, will not be less than the net asset value per share of our common stock at the time of the offering.
 
Our common stock may be offered directly to one or more purchasers by us or through agents designated from time to time by us, or to or through underwriters or dealers. The prospectus supplement relating to the offering will disclose the terms of the offering, including the name or names of any agents or underwriters involved in the sale of our common stock by us, the purchase price, and any fee, commission or discount arrangement between us and our agents or underwriters or among our underwriters or the basis upon which such amount may be calculated. See “Plan of Distribution.” We may not sell any of our common stock through agents, underwriters or dealers without delivery of a prospectus supplement describing the method and terms of the offering of our common stock.
 
Set forth below is additional information regarding the offering of our common stock:
 
Use of proceeds We intend to use substantially all of the net proceeds from the sale of our common stock to make investments in small and mid-sized companies in accordance with our investment objective and strategies described in this prospectus, and for general corporate purposes. We may also use a portion of the net proceeds to reduce any of our outstanding borrowings. Pending such use, we will invest the net proceeds primarily in high quality, short-term debt securities consistent with our business development company election and our election to be taxed as a RIC. See “Use of Proceeds.”
 
New York Stock Exchange symbol “FSC”
 
Investment advisory fees Fifth Street Management serves as our investment adviser. We pay Fifth Street Management a fee for its services under the investment advisory agreement consisting of two components — a base management fee and an incentive fee. The base management fee is calculated at an annual rate of 2% of our gross assets, which includes any borrowings for investment purposes. From and after January 1, 2010, our investment adviser permanently waived the portion of the base management fee attributable to cash and cash equivalents (as defined in the notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements). The incentive fee consists of two parts. The first part is calculated and payable quarterly in arrears and equals 20% of our “Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income” for the immediately preceding quarter, subject to a preferred return, or “hurdle,” and a “catch up” feature. The second part is determined and payable in arrears as of the end of each fiscal year (or upon termination of the investment advisory agreement) and equals 20% of our “Incentive Fee Capital Gains,” which equals our realized capital gains on a cumulative basis from inception through the end of the year, if any, computed net of all realized capital losses and unrealized capital depreciation on a cumulative basis, less the aggregate amount of any previously paid capital gain incentive fee. See “Investment Advisory Agreement.”
 
Administration agreement FSC, Inc. serves as our administrator. We reimburse our administrator the allocable portion of overhead and other expenses incurred by our administrator in performing its obligations under the administration agreement, including rent and our allocable portion of the costs of compensation and related expenses of our chief financial officer and chief compliance officer, and their staff. See “Administration Agreement.” Our administrator has voluntarily determined to forgo receiving reimbursement for the services performed for us by our chief compliance officer, Bernard D. Berman, given his compensation.


5


Table of Contents

However, although our administrator currently intends to forgo its right to receive such reimbursement, it is under no obligation to do so and may cease to do so at any time in the future.
 
Distributions We intend to pay dividends to our stockholders out of assets legally available for distribution. From our initial public offering through the fourth fiscal quarter of 2010, we paid quarterly dividends, but in the first fiscal quarter of 2011 we began paying, and we intend to continue paying, monthly dividends to our stockholders. Our distributions, if any, will be determined by our Board of Directors.
 
Taxation We elected to be treated for federal income tax purposes as a RIC under Subchapter M of the Code. Accordingly, we generally will not pay corporate-level federal income taxes on any net ordinary income or capital gains that we distribute to our stockholders as dividends. To maintain our RIC tax treatment, we must meet specified source-of-income and asset diversification requirements and distribute annually at least 90% of our net ordinary income and realized net short-term capital gains in excess of realized net long-term capital losses, if any. Depending on the level of taxable income earned in a tax year, we may choose to carry forward taxable income in excess of current year distributions into the next tax year and pay a 4% excise tax on such income. Any such carryover taxable income must be distributed through a dividend declared prior to filing the final tax return related to the year which generated such taxable income. See “Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations.”
 
Dividend reinvestment plan We have adopted a dividend reinvestment plan for our stockholders. The dividend reinvestment plan is an “opt out” reinvestment plan. As a result, if we declare a distribution, then stockholders’ cash distributions will be automatically reinvested in additional shares of our common stock, unless they specifically “opt out” of the dividend reinvestment plan so as to receive cash distributions. Stockholders who receive distributions in the form of stock will be subject to the same federal, state and local tax consequences as stockholders who elect to receive their distributions in cash; however, since their cash dividends will be reinvested, such stockholders will not receive cash with which to pay any applicable taxes on reinvested dividends. See “Dividend Reinvestment Plan.”
 
Risk factors Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. You should consider carefully the information found in “Risk Factors,” including the following risks:
 
  •  The current state of the economy and financial markets increases the likelihood of material adverse effects on our financial position and results of operations.
 
  •  A significant portion of our investment portfolio is and will continue to be recorded at fair value as determined in good faith by our Board of Directors and, as a result, there is and will continue to be uncertainty as to the value of our portfolio investments.
 
  •  Our business model depends to a significant extent upon strong referral relationships with private equity sponsors, and the inability of the principals of our investment adviser to maintain or develop these relationships, or the failure of these relationships to generate investment opportunities, could adversely affect our business.


6


Table of Contents

 
  •  We may face increasing competition for investment opportunities, which could reduce returns and result in losses.
 
  •  Because we borrow money, the potential for loss on amounts invested in us will be magnified and may increase the risk of investing in us.
 
  •  Substantially all of our assets could potentially be subject to security interests under secured credit facilities and if we default on our obligations under the facilities, we may suffer adverse consequences, including the lenders foreclosing on our assets.
 
  •  Because we intend to distribute between 90% and 100% of our income to our stockholders in connection with our election to be treated as a RIC, we will continue to need additional capital to finance our growth. If additional funds are unavailable or not available on favorable terms, our ability to grow will be impaired.
 
  •  Regulations governing our operation as a business development company and RIC affect our ability to raise, and the way in which we raise, additional capital or borrow for investment purposes, which may have a negative effect on our growth.
 
  •  Our SBIC subsidiary’s investment adviser has no prior experience managing an SBIC and any failure to comply with SBA regulations, resulting from our SBIC subsidiary’s investment adviser’s lack of experience or otherwise, could have a material adverse effect on our operations.
 
  •  We will be subject to corporate-level income tax if we are unable to maintain our qualification as a RIC under Subchapter M of the Code or do not satisfy the annual distribution requirement.
 
  •  We may not be able to pay you distributions, our distributions may not grow over time and a portion of our distributions may be a return of capital.
 
  •  Our investments in portfolio companies may be risky, and we could lose all or part of our investment.
 
  •  Investing in small and mid-sized companies involves a number of significant risks. Among other things, these companies:
 
  •  may have limited financial resources and may be unable to meet their obligations under their debt instruments that we hold, which may be accompanied by a deterioration in the value of any collateral and a reduction in the likelihood of us realizing any guarantees from subsidiaries or affiliates of our portfolio companies that we may have obtained in connection with our investment, as well as a corresponding decrease in the value of the equity components of our investments;
 
  •  may have shorter operating histories, narrower product lines, smaller market shares and/or significant customer concentrations than larger businesses, which tend to render them more vulnerable to competitors’ actions and market conditions, as well as general economic downturns;


7


Table of Contents

 
  •  are more likely to depend on the management talents and efforts of a small group of persons; therefore, the death, disability, resignation or termination of one or more of these persons could have a material adverse impact on our portfolio company and, in turn, on us;
 
  •  generally have less predictable operating results, may from time to time be parties to litigation, may be engaged in rapidly changing businesses with products subject to a substantial risk of obsolescence, and may require substantial additional capital to support their operations, finance expansion or maintain their competitive position; and
 
  •  generally have less publicly available information about their businesses, operations and financial condition. If we are unable to uncover all material information about these companies, we may not make a fully informed investment decision, and may lose all or part of our investment.
 
  •  Our portfolio companies may incur debt that ranks equally with, or senior to, our investments in such companies.
 
  •  We may expose ourselves to risks if we engage in hedging transactions.
 
  •  Shares of closed-end investment companies, including business development companies, may trade at a discount to their net asset value.
 
  •  We may be unable to invest a significant portion of the net proceeds of this offering on acceptable terms within an attractive timeframe.
 
  •  The market price of our common stock may fluctuate significantly.
 
See “Risk Factors” beginning on page 12 for a more complete discussion of these and other risks you should carefully consider before deciding to invest in shares of our common stock.
 
Leverage We expect to continue to use leverage to make investments. As a result, we may continue to be exposed to the risks of leverage, which include that leverage may be considered a speculative investment technique. The use of leverage magnifies the potential for gain and loss on amounts invested and therefore increases the risks associated with investing in our shares of common stock.
 
Available information We file periodic reports, current reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC. This information is available at the SEC’s public reference room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, D.C. 20549 and on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. The public may obtain information on the operation of the SEC’s public reference room by calling the SEC at (202) 551-8090. This information is also available free of charge by contacting us at Fifth Street Finance Corp., 10 Bank Street, 12th Floor, White Plains, NY, 10606, by telephone at (914) 286-6800, or on our website at www.fifthstreetfinance.com. The information on this website is not incorporated by reference into this prospectus.


8


Table of Contents

 
FEES AND EXPENSES
 
The following table is intended to assist you in understanding the costs and expenses that an investor in this offering will bear directly or indirectly. We caution you that some of the percentages indicated in the table below are estimates and may vary. Moreover, the information set forth below does not include any transaction costs and expenses that investors will incur in connection with each offering of shares of our common stock pursuant to this prospectus. As a result, investors are urged to read the “Fees and Expenses” table contained in any corresponding prospectus supplement to fully understanding the actual transaction costs and expenses they will incur in connection with each such offering. Except where the context suggests otherwise, whenever this prospectus contains a reference to fees or expenses paid by “you,” “us” or “Fifth Street,” or that “we” will pay fees or expenses, stockholders will indirectly bear such fees or expenses as investors in us.
 
         
Stockholder transaction expenses:
       
Sales load (as a percentage of offering price)
    %(1)
Offering expenses (as a percentage of offering price)
    %(2)
Dividend reinvestment plan fees
    %(3)
         
Total stockholder transaction expenses (as a percentage of offering price)
    %(4)
Annual expenses (as a percentage of net assets attributable to common stock):
       
Management fees
    5.07 %(5)
Interest payments on borrowed funds
    2.11 %(6)
Other expenses
    2.32 %(7)
         
Total annual expenses
    9.50 %(8)
 
 
(1) In the event that our common stock is sold to or through underwriters, a corresponding prospectus supplement will disclose the applicable sales load.
 
(2) In the event that we conduct on offering of our common stock, a corresponding prospectus supplement will disclose the estimated offering expenses.
 
(3) The expenses of administering our dividend reinvestment plan are included in operating expenses.
 
(4) Total stockholder transaction expenses may include sales load and will be disclosed in a future prospectus supplement, if any.
 
(5) Our “management fees” are made up of our base management fee and the incentive fees payable under our investment advisory agreement. The base management fee portion of our “management fees” reflected in the table above is 2.63%, which is calculated based on our net assets (rather than our gross assets). Our base management fee under the investment advisory agreement is based on our gross assets, which includes borrowings for investment purposes. Our investment adviser permanently waived the portion of the base management fee attributable to cash and cash equivalents (as defined in the notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements) as of the end of each quarter beginning March 31, 2010. As a result, our base management fee payable from and after such fiscal quarter will be calculated at an annual rate of 2% of our gross assets, including any investments made with borrowings, but excluding any cash and cash equivalents as of the end of each quarter. See “Investment Advisory Agreement — Overview of Our Investment Adviser — Management Fee.”
 
The incentive fee portion of our “management fees” is 2.44%. This calculation assumes that annual incentive fees earned by our investment adviser remain consistent with the incentive fees earned by our investment adviser during the quarter ended December 31, 2010. The incentive fee consists of two parts. The first part, which is payable quarterly in arrears, is equal to 20% of the excess, if any, of our “Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income” that exceeds a 2% quarterly (8% annualized) hurdle rate, subject to a “catch up” provision measured at the end of each fiscal quarter. The first part of the incentive fee is computed and paid on income that may include interest that is accrued but not yet received in cash. The operation of the first part of the incentive fee for each quarter is as follows:
 
• no incentive fee is payable to the investment adviser in any fiscal quarter in which our Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income does not exceed the hurdle rate of 2% (the “preferred return” or “hurdle”);


9


Table of Contents

 
• 100% of our Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income with respect to that portion of such Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income, if any, that exceeds the hurdle rate but is less than or equal to 2.5% in any fiscal quarter (10% annualized) is payable to the investment adviser. We refer to this portion of our Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income (which exceeds the hurdle rate but is less than or equal to 2.5%) as the “catch-up.” The “catch-up” provision is intended to provide our investment adviser with an incentive fee of 20% on all of our Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income as if a hurdle rate did not apply when our Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income exceeds 2.5% in any fiscal quarter; and
 
• 20% of the amount of our Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income, if any, that exceeds 2.5% in any fiscal quarter (10% annualized) is payable to the investment adviser (once the hurdle is reached and the catch-up is achieved, 20% of all Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income thereafter is allocated to the investment adviser).
 
The second part of the incentive fee equals 20% of our “Incentive Fee Capital Gains,” which equals our realized capital gains on a cumulative basis from inception through the end of the year, if any, computed net of all realized capital losses and unrealized capital depreciation on a cumulative basis, less the aggregate amount of any previously paid capital gain incentive fees. The second part of the incentive fee is payable, in arrears, at the end of each fiscal year (or upon termination of the investment advisory agreement, as of the termination date).
 
(6) “Interest payments on borrowed funds” represent our estimated annual interest payments on borrowed funds and relate to borrowings under the Wells Fargo facility, the ING facility and our SBA-guaranteed debentures.
 
(7) “Other expenses” are based on estimated amounts for the current fiscal year, which are higher than such actual expenses for the year ended September 30, 2010.
 
(8) “Total annual expenses” is presented as a percentage of net assets attributable to common stockholders because our common stockholders bear all of our fees and expenses.
 
Example
 
The following example demonstrates the projected dollar amount of total cumulative expenses that would be incurred over various periods with respect to a hypothetical investment in our common stock. In calculating the following expense amounts, we have assumed we would have no additional leverage, that none of our assets are cash or cash equivalents and that our annual operating expenses would remain at the levels set forth in the table above. In the event that shares to which this prospectus relates are sold to or through underwriters, a corresponding prospectus supplement will restate this example to reflect the applicable sales load and offering expenses.
 
                                 
    1 Year   3 Years   5 Years   10 Years
 
You would pay the following expenses on a $1,000 investment, assuming a 5% annual return
  $ 96     $ 281     $ 460     $ 875  
 
The example and the expenses in the tables above should not be considered a representation of our future expenses, and actual expenses may be greater or less than those shown. While the example assumes, as required by the SEC, a 5% annual return, our performance will vary and may result in a return greater or less than 5%. The income portion of our incentive fee under the investment advisory agreement, which, assuming a 5% annual return, would either not be payable or have an insignificant impact on the expense amounts shown above, is not included in the example. If we achieve sufficient returns on our investments, including through the realization of capital gains, to trigger an incentive fee of a material amount, our expenses, and returns to our investors, would be higher. In addition, while the example assumes reinvestment of all distributions at net asset value, participants in our dividend reinvestment plan will receive a number of shares of our common stock, determined by dividing the total dollar amount of the cash distribution payable to a participant by either (i) the greater of (a) the current net asset value per share of our common stock and (b) 95% of the market price per share of our common stock at the close of trading on the payment date fixed by our Board of Directors in the event that we use newly issued shares to satisfy the share requirements of the divided reinvestment plan or (ii) the average purchase price, excluding any brokerage charges or other charges, of all shares of common stock purchased by the administrator of the dividend reinvestment plan in the event that shares are purchased in the open market to satisfy the share requirements of the dividend reinvestment plan, which may be at, above or below net asset value. See “Dividend Reinvestment Plan” for additional information regarding our dividend reinvestment plan.
 


10


Table of Contents

 
SELECTED FINANCIAL AND OTHER DATA
 
The following selected financial data should be read together with our consolidated financial statements and the related notes and the discussion under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” which are included elsewhere in this prospectus. Effective as of January 2, 2008, Fifth Street Mezzanine Partners III, L.P. merged with and into Fifth Street Finance Corp. The financial information as of and for the period from inception (February 15, 2007) to September 30, 2007 and for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2008, 2009 and 2010, set forth below was derived from the audited consolidated financial statements and related notes for Fifth Street Mezzanine Partners III, L.P. and Fifth Street Finance Corp., respectively. The financial information at and for the three months ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 was derived from our unaudited financial statements and related notes. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting solely of normal recurring accruals, considered necessary for the fair presentation of financial statements for the interim periods, have been included. The historical financial information below may not be indicative of our future performance. Our results for the interim period may not be indicative of our results for the full year.
 
                                                 
                                  At September 30, 2007
 
    At and for the
                      and for the period
 
    Three Months
    At and for the Year Ended
    February 15, 2007
 
    Ended December 31,     September 30,     through
 
    2010     2009     2010     2009     2008     September 30, 2007  
    (In thousands, except per share amounts)  
 
                                                 
Statement of Operations data:
                                               
Total investment income
  $ 25,335     $ 13,241     $ 70,538     $ 49,828     $ 33,219     $ 4,296  
Base management fee, net
    3,779       1,540       9,275       5,889       4,258       1,564  
Incentive fee
    3,514       2,087       10,756       7,841       4,118        
All other expenses
    3,986       1,265       7,483       4,736       4,699       1,773  
Net investment income
    14,056       8,349       43,024       31,362       20,144       959  
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on interest rate swap
    736             (773 )                  
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments
    16,106       999       (1,055 )     (10,795 )     (16,948 )     123  
Net realized gain (loss) on investments
    (13,450 )     106       (18,780 )     (14,373 )     62        
Net increase in partners’ capital/net assets resulting from operations
    17,448       9,454       22,416       6,194       3,258       1,082  
Per share data:
                                               
Net asset value per common share at period end
  $ 10.44     $ 10.82     $ 10.43     $ 10.84     $ 13.02     $ N/A  
Market price at period end
    12.14       10.74       11.14       10.93       10.05       N/A  
Net investment income
    0.26       0.22       0.95       1.27       1.29       N/A  
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments and interest rate swap
    0.06       0.03       (0.46 )     (1.02 )     (1.08 )     N/A  
Net increase in partners’ capital/net assets resulting from operations
    0.32       0.25       0.49       0.25       0.21       N/A  
Dividends paid
    0.32       0.27       0.99       1.20       0.61       N/A  
Balance Sheet data at period end:
                                               
Total investments at fair value
  $ 742,395     $ 436,694     $ 563,821     $ 299,611     $ 273,759     $ 88,391  
Cash and cash equivalents
    43,021       11,782       76,765       113,205       22,906       17,654  
Other assets
    13,360       4,723       11,340       3,071       2,484       1,285  
Total assets
    798,776       453,199       651,926       415,887       299,149       107,330  
Total liabilities
    223,856       42,941       82,754       5,331       4,813       514  
Total net assets
    574,920       410,257       569,172       410,556       294,336       106,816  
Other data:
                                               
Weighted average annual yield on debt investments(1)
    13.2 %     14.9 %     14.0 %     15.7 %     16.2 %     16.8 %
Number of portfolio companies at period end
    45       32       38       28       24       10  
 
 
(1) Weighted average annual yield is calculated based upon our debt investments at the end of the period.


11


Table of Contents

 
RISK FACTORS
 
Investing in our common stock involves a number of significant risks. In addition to the other information contained in this prospectus and any accompanying prospectus supplement, you should consider carefully the following information before making an investment in our common stock. The risks set out below are not the only risks we face; however, they discuss the presently known principal risks of investing in our common stock. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us might also impair our operations and performance. If any of the following events occur, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. In such case, our net asset value and the trading price of our common stock could decline, and you may lose part or all of your investment.
 
Risks Relating to Economic Conditions
 
The current state of the economy and financial markets increases the likelihood of material adverse effects on our financial position and results of operations.
 
The U.S. capital markets experienced extreme volatility and disruption over the past several years, leading to recessionary conditions and depressed levels of consumer and commercial spending. Disruptions in the capital markets increased the spread between the yields realized on risk-free and higher risk securities, resulting in illiquidity in parts of the capital markets. While recent indicators suggest improvement in the capital markets, we cannot provide any assurance that these conditions will not worsen. If these conditions continue or worsen, the prolonged period of market illiquidity may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations. Unfavorable economic conditions also could increase our funding costs, limit our access to the capital markets or result in a decision by lenders not to extend credit to us. These events could limit our investment originations, limit our ability to grow and negatively impact our operating results.
 
In addition, to the extent that recessionary conditions return, the financial results of small to mid-sized companies, like those in which we invest, will likely experience deterioration, which could ultimately lead to difficulty in meeting debt service requirements and an increase in defaults. Additionally, the end markets for certain of our portfolio companies’ products and services have experienced, and continue to experience, negative economic trends. The performances of certain of our portfolio companies have been, and may continue to be, negatively impacted by these economic or other conditions, which may ultimately result in our receipt of a reduced level of interest income from our portfolio companies and/or losses or charge offs related to our investments, and, in turn, may adversely affect distributable income.
 
Economic recessions or downturns could impair the ability of our portfolio companies to repay loans, which, in turn, could increase our non-performing assets, decrease the value of our portfolio, reduce our volume of new loans and harm our operating results, which would have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.
 
Many of our portfolio companies are and may be susceptible to economic slowdowns or recessions and may be unable to repay our loans during such periods. Therefore, our non-performing assets are likely to increase and the value of our portfolio is likely to decrease during such periods. Adverse economic conditions also may decrease the value of collateral securing some of our loans and the value of our equity investments. In this regard, as a result of recent economic conditions and their impact on certain of our portfolio companies, we have agreed to modify the payment terms of our investments in four of our portfolio companies as of December 31, 2010. Such modified terms include changes in payment-in-kind interest provisions and/or cash interest rates. These modifications, and any future modifications to our loan agreements as a result of the recent economic conditions or otherwise, may limit the amount of interest income that we recognize from the modified investments, which may, in turn, limit our ability to make distributions to our stockholders and have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.


12


Table of Contents

Risks Relating to Our Business and Structure
 
Changes in interest rates may affect our cost of capital and net investment income.
 
Because we may borrow to fund our investments, a portion of our net investment income may be dependent upon the difference between the interest rate at which we borrow funds and the interest rate at which we invest these funds. A portion of our investments will have fixed interest rates, while a portion of our borrowings will likely have floating interest rates. As a result, a significant change in market interest rates could have a material adverse effect on our net investment income. In periods of rising interest rates, our cost of funds could increase, which would reduce our net investment income. We may hedge against such interest rate fluctuations by using standard hedging instruments such as interest rate swap agreements, futures, options and forward contracts, subject to applicable legal requirements, including without limitation, all necessary registrations (or exemptions from registration) with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. These activities may limit our ability to participate in the benefits of lower interest rates with respect to the hedged borrowings. Adverse developments resulting from changes in interest rates or hedging transactions could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
 
We have a limited operating history.
 
Fifth Street Mezzanine Partners III, L.P. commenced operations on February 15, 2007. On January 2, 2008, Fifth Street Mezzanine Partners III, L.P. merged with and into Fifth Street Finance Corp., a Delaware corporation. As a result, we are subject to all of the business risks and uncertainties associated with any new business, including the risk that we will not achieve our investment objective and that the value of our common stock could decline substantially.
 
A significant portion of our investment portfolio is and will continue to be recorded at fair value as determined in good faith by our Board of Directors and, as a result, there is and will continue to be uncertainty as to the value of our portfolio investments.
 
Under the 1940 Act, we are required to carry our portfolio investments at market value or, if there is no readily available market value, at fair value as determined by our Board of Directors. Typically, there is not a public market for the securities of the privately held companies in which we have invested and will generally continue to invest. As a result, we value these securities quarterly at fair value as determined in good faith by our Board of Directors.
 
Certain factors that may be considered in determining the fair value of our investments include the nature and realizable value of any collateral, the portfolio company’s earnings and its ability to make payments on its indebtedness, the markets in which the portfolio company does business, comparison to comparable publicly-traded companies, discounted cash flow and other relevant factors. Because such valuations, and particularly valuations of private securities and private companies, are inherently uncertain, may fluctuate over short periods of time and may be based on estimates, our determinations of fair value may differ materially from the values that would have been used if a ready market for these securities existed. Due to this uncertainty, our fair value determinations may cause our net asset value on a given date to materially understate or overstate the value that we may ultimately realize upon the sale of one or more of our investments. As a result, investors purchasing our common stock based on an overstated net asset value would pay a higher price than the realizable value of our investments might warrant.
 
Our ability to achieve our investment objective depends on our investment adviser’s ability to support our investment process; if our investment adviser were to lose any of its principals, our ability to achieve our investment objective could be significantly harmed.
 
As discussed above, we were organized on February 15, 2007. We have no employees and, as a result, we depend on the investment expertise, skill and network of business contacts of the principals of our investment adviser. The principals of our investment adviser evaluate, negotiate, structure, execute, monitor and service our investments. Our future success will depend to a significant extent on the continued service and coordination of the principals of our investment adviser. The departure of any of these individuals could have a material adverse effect on our ability to achieve our investment objective.


13


Table of Contents

Our ability to achieve our investment objective depends on our investment adviser’s ability to identify, analyze, invest in, finance and monitor companies that meet our investment criteria. Our investment adviser’s capabilities in structuring the investment process, providing competent, attentive and efficient services to us, and facilitating access to financing on acceptable terms depend on the employment of investment professionals in adequate number and of adequate sophistication to match the corresponding flow of transactions. To achieve our investment objective, our investment adviser may need to hire, train, supervise and manage new investment professionals to participate in our investment selection and monitoring process. Our investment adviser may not be able to find investment professionals in a timely manner or at all. Failure to support our investment process could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
 
Our business model depends to a significant extent upon strong referral relationships with private equity sponsors, and the inability of the principals of our investment adviser to maintain or develop these relationships, or the failure of these relationships to generate investment opportunities, could adversely affect our business.
 
We expect that the principals of our investment adviser will maintain and develop their relationships with private equity sponsors, and we will rely to a significant extent upon these relationships to provide us with potential investment opportunities. If the principals of our investment adviser fail to maintain their existing relationships or develop new relationships with other sponsors or sources of investment opportunities, we will not be able to grow our investment portfolio. In addition, individuals with whom the principals of our investment adviser have relationships are not obligated to provide us with investment opportunities, and, therefore, there is no assurance that such relationships will generate investment opportunities for us.
 
We may face increasing competition for investment opportunities, which could reduce returns and result in losses.
 
We compete for investments with other business development companies and investment funds (including private equity funds and mezzanine funds), as well as traditional financial services companies such as commercial banks and other sources of funding. Many of our competitors are substantially larger and have considerably greater financial, technical and marketing resources than we do. For example, some competitors may have a lower cost of capital and access to funding sources that are not available to us. In addition, some of our competitors may have higher risk tolerances or different risk assessments than we have. These characteristics could allow our competitors to consider a wider variety of investments, establish more relationships and offer better pricing and more flexible structuring than we are able to do. We may lose investment opportunities if we do not match our competitors’ pricing, terms and structure. If we are forced to match our competitors’ pricing, terms and structure, we may not be able to achieve acceptable returns on our investments or may bear substantial risk of capital loss. A significant part of our competitive advantage stems from the fact that the market for investments in small and mid-sized companies is underserved by traditional commercial banks and other financial sources. A significant increase in the number and/or the size of our competitors in this target market could force us to accept less attractive investment terms. Furthermore, many of our competitors have greater experience operating under, or are not subject to, the regulatory restrictions that the 1940 Act imposes on us as a business development company.
 
Our incentive fee may induce our investment adviser to make speculative investments.
 
The incentive fee payable by us to our investment adviser may create an incentive for it to make investments on our behalf that are risky or more speculative than would be the case in the absence of such compensation arrangement, which could result in higher investment losses, particularly during cyclical economic downturns. The way in which the incentive fee payable to our investment adviser is determined, which is calculated separately in two components as a percentage of the income (subject to a hurdle rate) and as a percentage of the realized gain on invested capital, may encourage our investment adviser to use leverage to increase the return on our investments or otherwise manipulate our income so as to recognize income in quarters where the hurdle rate is exceeded. Under certain circumstances, the use of leverage may increase the likelihood of default, which would disfavor the holders of our common stock, including investors in offerings of common stock pursuant to this prospectus.


14


Table of Contents

The incentive fee payable by us to our investment adviser also may create an incentive for our investment adviser to invest on our behalf in instruments that have a deferred interest feature. Under these investments, we would accrue the interest over the life of the investment but would not receive the cash income from the investment until the end of the investment’s term, if at all. Our net investment income used to calculate the income portion of our incentive fee, however, includes accrued interest. Thus, a portion of the incentive fee would be based on income that we have not yet received in cash and may never receive in cash if the portfolio company is unable to satisfy such interest payment obligation to us. Consequently, while we may make incentive fee payments on income accruals that we may not collect in the future and with respect to which we do not have a formal “claw back” right against our investment adviser per se, the amount of accrued income written off in any period will reduce the income in the period in which such write-off was taken and thereby reduce such period’s incentive fee payment.
 
In addition, our investment adviser receives the incentive fee based, in part, upon net capital gains realized on our investments. Unlike the portion of the incentive fee based on income, there is no performance threshold applicable to the portion of the incentive fee based on net capital gains. As a result, our investment adviser may have a tendency to invest more in investments that are likely to result in capital gains as compared to income producing securities. Such a practice could result in our investing in more speculative securities than would otherwise be the case, which could result in higher investment losses, particularly during economic downturns.
 
Given the subjective nature of the investment decisions made by our investment adviser on our behalf, we will be unable to monitor these potential conflicts of interest between us and our investment adviser.
 
Our base management fee may induce our investment adviser to incur leverage.
 
The fact that our base management fee is payable based upon our gross assets, which would include any borrowings for investment purposes, may encourage our investment adviser to use leverage to make additional investments. Under certain circumstances, the use of increased leverage may increase the likelihood of default, which would disfavor holders of our common stock, including investors in offerings of common stock pursuant to this prospectus. Given the subjective nature of the investment decisions made by our investment adviser on our behalf, we will not be able to monitor this potential conflict of interest.
 
Because we borrow money, the potential for loss on amounts invested in us will be magnified and may increase the risk of investing in us.
 
Borrowings, also known as leverage, magnify the potential for loss on invested equity capital. If we continue to use leverage to partially finance our investments, through borrowings from banks and others, you will experience increased risks of investing in our common stock. We, through our SBIC subsidiary, issue debt securities guaranteed by the SBA and sold in the capital markets. As a result of its guarantee of the debt securities, the SBA has fixed dollar claims on the assets of our SBIC subsidiary that are superior to the claims of our common stockholders. We may also borrow under our credit facilities. If the value of our assets decreases, leveraging would cause net asset value to decline more sharply than it otherwise would have had we not leveraged. Similarly, any decrease in our income would cause net income to decline more sharply than it would have had we not borrowed. Such a decline could negatively affect our ability to make common stock distribution payments. Leverage is generally considered a speculative investment technique.
 
As of December 31, 2010, we, through our SBIC subsidiary, had $123.3 million of outstanding indebtedness guaranteed by the SBA and $89.0 million of outstanding indebtedness under our credit facilities. The debentures and our credit facilities require periodic payments of interest. The weighted average interest rate charged on our borrowings as of December 31, 2010 was 3.42% (exclusive of deferred financing costs). We will need to generate sufficient cash flow to make these required interest payments. If we are unable to meet the financial obligations under the debentures, the SBA, as a creditor, will have a superior claim to the assets of our SBIC subsidiary over our stockholders in the event we liquidate or the SBA exercises its remedies under such debentures as the result of a default by us. If we are unable to meet the financial obligations under our credit facilities, the lenders under the credit facilities will have a superior to claim to our assets over our stockholders.
 
We have received exemptive relief from the SEC to permit us to exclude the debt of our SBIC subsidiary guaranteed by the SBA from the definition of senior securities in the 200% asset coverage ratio we are required to


15


Table of Contents

maintain under the 1940 Act. As a result of our receipt of this relief, we have the ability to incur leverage in excess of the amounts set forth in the 1940 Act. If we incur additional leverage in excess of the amounts set forth in the 1940 Act, our net asset value will decline more sharply if the value of our assets declines than if we had not incurred such additional leverage and the effects of leverage described above will be magnified.
 
Illustration.  The following table illustrates the effect of leverage on returns from an investment in our common stock assuming various annual returns, net of expenses. The calculations in the table below are hypothetical and actual returns may be higher or lower than those appearing below.
 
Assumed Return on Our Portfolio(1)
(net of expenses)
 
                                         
    -10.0%     -5.0%     0.0%     5.0%     10.0%  
 
Corresponding net return to common stockholder
    -15.16 %     -8.21 %     -1.26 %     5.68 %     12.63 %
 
 
(1) Assumes $798.8 million in total assets, $212.3 million in debt outstanding, $574.9 million in net assets, and an average cost of funds of 3.42%. Actual interest payments may be different.
 
Substantially all of our assets are subject to security interests under secured credit facilities or claims of the SBA with respect to our SBA-guaranteed debentures and if we default on our obligations thereunder, we may suffer adverse consequences, including the lenders and/or the SBA foreclosing on our assets.
 
As of December 31, 2010, substantially all of our assets were pledged as collateral under our credit facilities or subject to a superior claim over our stockholders by the SBA. If we default on our obligations under these facilities or our SBA-guaranteed debentures, the lenders and/or the SBA may have the right to foreclose upon and sell, or otherwise transfer, the collateral subject to their security interests or their superior claim. In such event, we may be forced to sell our investments to raise funds to repay our outstanding borrowings in order to avoid foreclosure and these forced sales may be at times and at prices we would not consider advantageous. Moreover, such deleveraging of our company could significantly impair our ability to effectively operate our business in the manner in which we have historically operated. As a result, we could be forced to curtail or cease new investment activities and lower or eliminate the dividends that we have historically paid to our stockholders.
 
In addition, if the lenders exercise their right to sell the assets pledged under our credit facilities, such sales may be completed at distressed sale prices, thereby diminishing or potentially eliminating the amount of cash available to us after repayment of the amounts outstanding under the credit facilities.
 
Because we intend to distribute between 90% and 100% of our income to our stockholders in connection with our election to be treated as a RIC, we will continue to need additional capital to finance our growth. If additional funds are unavailable or not available on favorable terms, our ability to grow will be impaired.
 
In order to qualify for the tax benefits available to RICs and to minimize corporate-level taxes, we intend to distribute to our stockholders between 90% and 100% of our annual taxable income, except that we may retain certain net capital gains for investment, and treat such amounts as deemed distributions to our stockholders. If we elect to treat any amounts as deemed distributions, we must pay income taxes at the corporate rate on such deemed distributions on behalf of our stockholders. As a result of these requirements, we will likely need to raise capital from other sources to grow our business. As a business development company, we generally are required to meet a coverage ratio of total assets, less liabilities and indebtedness not represented by senior securities, to total senior securities, which includes all of our borrowings and any outstanding preferred stock, of at least 200%. These requirements limit the amount that we may borrow. Because we will continue to need capital to grow our investment portfolio, these limitations may prevent us from incurring debt and require us to raise additional equity at a time when it may be disadvantageous to do so.
 
While we expect to be able to borrow and to issue additional debt and equity securities, we cannot assure you that debt and equity financing will be available to us on favorable terms, or at all. Also, as a business development company, we generally are not permitted to issue equity securities priced below net asset value without stockholder


16


Table of Contents

approval. If additional funds are not available to us, we could be forced to curtail or cease new investment activities, and our net asset value and share price could decline.
 
Our ability to enter into transactions with our affiliates is restricted.
 
We are prohibited under the 1940 Act from participating in certain transactions with certain of our affiliates without the prior approval of the members of our independent directors and, in some cases, the SEC. Any person that owns, directly or indirectly, 5% or more of our outstanding voting securities is our affiliate for purposes of the 1940 Act and we are generally prohibited from buying or selling any securities (other than our securities) from or to such affiliate, absent the prior approval of our independent directors. The 1940 Act also prohibits certain “joint” transactions with certain of our affiliates, which could include investments in the same portfolio company (whether at the same or different times), without prior approval of our independent directors and, in some cases, the SEC. If a person acquires more than 25% of our voting securities, we are prohibited from buying or selling any security (other than any security of which we are the issuer) from or to such person or certain of that person’s affiliates, or entering into prohibited joint transactions with such person, absent the prior approval of the SEC. Similar restrictions limit our ability to transact business with our officers, or directors or their affiliates. As a result of these restrictions, we may be prohibited from buying or selling any security (other than any security of which we are the issuer) from or to any portfolio company of a private equity fund managed by our investment adviser without the prior approval of the SEC, which may limit the scope of investment opportunities that would otherwise be available to us.
 
There are significant potential conflicts of interest which could adversely impact our investment returns.
 
Our executive officers and directors, and certain members of our investment adviser, serve or may serve as officers, directors or principals of entities that operate in the same or a related line of business as we do or of investment funds managed by our affiliates. Accordingly, they may have obligations to investors in those entities, the fulfillment of which might not be in the best interests of us or our stockholders. For example, Mr. Tannenbaum, our chief executive officer and managing partner of our investment adviser, is the managing partner of Fifth Street Capital LLC, a private investment firm. Although the other investment funds managed by Fifth Street Capital LLC and its affiliates generally are fully committed and, other than follow-on investments in existing portfolio companies, are no longer making investments, in the future, the principals of our investment adviser may manage other funds which may from time to time have overlapping investment objectives with those of us and accordingly invest in, whether principally or secondarily, asset classes similar to those targeted by us. If this should occur, the principals of our investment adviser would face conflicts of interest in the allocation of investment opportunities to us and such other funds. Although our investment professionals will endeavor to allocate investment opportunities in a fair and equitable manner, we and our common stockholders could be adversely affected in the event investment opportunities are allocated among us and other investment vehicles managed or sponsored by, or affiliated with, our executive officers, directors and members of our investment adviser.
 
The incentive fee we pay to our investment adviser relating to capital gains may be effectively greater than 20%.
 
As a result of the operation of the cumulative method of calculating the capital gains portion of the incentive fee we pay to our investment adviser, the cumulative aggregate capital gains fee received by our investment adviser could be effectively greater than 20%, depending on the timing and extent of subsequent net realized capital losses or net unrealized depreciation. For additional information on this calculation, see the disclosure in footnote 2 to Example 2 under the caption “Investment Advisory Agreement — Management Fee — Incentive Fee.” We cannot predict whether, or to what extent, this payment calculation would affect your investment in our stock.
 
The involvement of our investment adviser’s investment professionals in our valuation process may create conflicts of interest.
 
Our portfolio investments are generally not in publicly traded securities. As a result, the values of these securities are not readily available. We value these securities at fair value as determined in good faith by our Board of Directors based upon the recommendation of the Valuation Committee of our Board of Directors. In connection with that determination, investment professionals from our investment adviser prepare portfolio company


17


Table of Contents

valuations based upon the most recent portfolio company financial statements available and projected financial results of each portfolio company. The participation of our investment adviser’s investment professionals in our valuation process could result in a conflict of interest as our investment adviser’s management fee is based, in part, on our gross assets.
 
A failure on our part to maintain our qualification as a business development company would significantly reduce our operating flexibility.
 
If we fail to continuously qualify as a business development company, we might be subject to regulation as a registered closed-end investment company under the 1940 Act, which would significantly decrease our operating flexibility. In addition, failure to comply with the requirements imposed on business development companies by the 1940 Act could cause the SEC to bring an enforcement action against us. For additional information on the qualification requirements of a business development company, see the disclosure under the caption “Regulation — Business Development Company Regulations.”
 
Regulations governing our operation as a business development company and RIC affect our ability to raise, and the way in which we raise, additional capital or borrow for investment purposes, which may have a negative effect on our growth.
 
As a result of the annual distribution requirement to qualify for tax free treatment at the corporate level on income and gains distributed to stockholders, we need to periodically access the capital markets to raise cash to fund new investments. We generally are not able to issue or sell our common stock at a price below net asset value per share, which may be a disadvantage as compared with other public companies or private investment funds. We may, however, sell our common stock, or warrants, options or rights to acquire our common stock, at a price below the current net asset value of the common stock if our Board of Directors and independent directors determine that such sale is in our best interests and the best interests of our stockholders, and our stockholders as well as those stockholders that are not affiliated with us approve such sale. In any such case, the price at which our securities are to be issued and sold may not be less than a price that, in the determination of our Board of Directors, closely approximates the market value of such securities (less any underwriting commission or discount). If our common stock trades at a discount to net asset value, this restriction could adversely affect our ability to raise capital.
 
We also may make rights offerings to our stockholders at prices less than net asset value, subject to applicable requirements of the 1940 Act. If we raise additional funds by issuing more shares of our common stock or issuing senior securities convertible into, or exchangeable for, our common stock, the percentage ownership of our stockholders may decline at that time and such stockholders may experience dilution. Moreover, we can offer no assurance that we will be able to issue and sell additional equity securities in the future, on terms favorable to us or at all.
 
In addition, we may issue “senior securities,” including borrowing money from banks or other financial institutions only in amounts such that our asset coverage, as defined in the 1940 Act, equals at least 200% after such incurrence or issuance. Our ability to issue different types of securities is also limited. Compliance with these requirements may unfavorably limit our investment opportunities and reduce our ability in comparison to other companies to profit from favorable spreads between the rates at which we can borrow and the rates at which we can lend. As a business development company, therefore, we may need to issue equity more frequently than our privately owned competitors, which may lead to greater stockholder dilution.
 
We expect to continue to borrow for investment purposes. If the value of our assets declines, we may be unable to satisfy the asset coverage test, which could prohibit us from paying dividends and could prevent us from qualifying as a RIC. If we cannot satisfy the asset coverage test, we may be required to sell a portion of our investments and, depending on the nature of our debt financing, repay a portion of our indebtedness at a time when such sales may be disadvantageous.
 
In addition, we may in the future seek to securitize our portfolio securities to generate cash for funding new investments. To securitize loans, we would likely create a wholly-owned subsidiary and contribute a pool of loans to the subsidiary. We would then sell interests in the subsidiary on a non-recourse basis to purchasers and we would retain all or a portion of the equity in the subsidiary. An inability to successfully securitize our loan portfolio could


18


Table of Contents

limit our ability to grow our business or fully execute our business strategy and may decrease our earnings, if any. The securitization market is subject to changing market conditions and we may not be able to access this market when we would otherwise deem appropriate. Moreover, the successful securitization of our portfolio might expose us to losses as the residual investments in which we do not sell interests will tend to be those that are riskier and more apt to generate losses. The 1940 Act also may impose restrictions on the structure of any securitization.
 
Our SBIC subsidiary’s investment adviser has no prior experience managing an SBIC and any failure to comply with SBA regulations, resulting from our SBIC subsidiary’s investment adviser’s lack of experience or otherwise, could have a material adverse effect on our operations.
 
On February 3, 2010, our wholly-owned subsidiary, Fifth Street Mezzanine Partners IV, L.P., received a license, effective February 1, 2010, from the SBA to operate as an SBIC under Section 301(c) of the Small Business Investment Act of 1958 and is regulated by the SBA. The SBIC license allows our SBIC subsidiary to obtain leverage by issuing SBA-guaranteed debentures, subject to the issuance of a capital commitment by the SBA and other customary procedures. The SBA places certain limitations on the financing terms of investments by SBICs in portfolio companies and prohibits SBICs from providing funds for certain purposes or to businesses in a few prohibited industries. Compliance with SBIC requirements may cause our SBIC subsidiary to forego attractive investment opportunities that are not permitted under SBA regulations.
 
Further, SBA regulations require that a licensed SBIC be periodically examined and audited by the SBA to determine its compliance with the relevant SBA regulations. The SBA prohibits, without prior SBA approval, a “change of control” of an SBIC or transfers that would result in any person (or a group of persons acting in concert) owning 10% or more of a class of capital stock of a licensed SBIC. If our SBIC subsidiary fails to comply with applicable SBA regulations, the SBA could, depending on the severity of the violation, limit or prohibit its use of debentures, declare outstanding debentures immediately due and payable, and/or limit it from making new investments. In addition, the SBA can revoke or suspend a license for willful or repeated violation of, or willful or repeated failure to observe, any provision of the Small Business Investment Act of 1958 or any rule or regulation promulgated thereunder. These actions by the SBA would, in turn, negatively affect us because our SBIC subsidiary is our wholly-owned subsidiary. Our SBIC subsidiary’s investment adviser does not have any prior experience managing an SBIC. Its lack of experience in complying with SBA regulations may hinder its ability to take advantage of our SBIC subsidiary’s access to SBA-guaranteed debentures.
 
Any failure to comply with SBA regulations could have a material adverse effect on our operations.
 
We may experience fluctuations in our quarterly results.
 
We could experience fluctuations in our quarterly operating results due to a number of factors, including our ability or inability to make investments in companies that meet our investment criteria, the interest rate payable on the debt securities we acquire, the level of our expenses, variations in and the timing of the recognition of realized and unrealized gains or losses, the degree to which we encounter competition in our market and general economic conditions. As a result of these factors, results for any period should not be relied upon as being indicative of performance in future periods.
 
Our Board of Directors may change our investment objective, operating policies and strategies without prior notice or stockholder approval, the effects of which may be adverse.
 
Our Board of Directors has the authority to modify or waive our current investment objective, operating policies and strategies without prior notice and without stockholder approval. We cannot predict the effect any changes to our current investment objective, operating policies and strategies would have on our business, net asset value, operating results and value of our stock. However, the effects might be adverse, which could negatively impact our ability to pay you distributions and cause you to lose part or all of your investment.


19


Table of Contents

We will be subject to corporate-level income tax if we are unable to maintain our qualification as a RIC under Subchapter M of the Code or do not satisfy the annual distribution requirement.
 
To maintain RIC status and be relieved of federal taxes on income and gains distributed to our stockholders, we must meet the following annual distribution, income source and asset diversification requirements.
 
  •  The annual distribution requirement for a RIC will be satisfied if we distribute to our stockholders on an annual basis at least 90% of our net ordinary income and realized net short-term capital gains in excess of realized net long-term capital losses, if any. Because we may use debt financing, we are subject to an asset coverage ratio requirement under the 1940 Act and we may be subject to certain financial covenants under our debt arrangements that could, under certain circumstances, restrict us from making distributions necessary to satisfy the distribution requirement. If we are unable to obtain cash from other sources, we could fail to qualify for RIC tax treatment and thus become subject to corporate-level income tax.
 
  •  The income source requirement will be satisfied if we obtain at least 90% of our income for each year from dividends, interest, gains from the sale of stock or securities or similar sources.
 
  •  The asset diversification requirement will be satisfied if we meet certain asset diversification requirements at the end of each quarter of our taxable year. To satisfy this requirement, at least 50% of the value of our assets must consist of cash, cash equivalents, U.S. government securities, securities of other RICs, and other acceptable securities; and no more than 25% of the value of our assets can be invested in the securities, other than U.S. government securities or securities of other RICs, of one issuer, of two or more issuers that are controlled, as determined under applicable Code rules, by us and that are engaged in the same or similar or related trades or businesses or of certain “qualified publicly traded partnerships.” Failure to meet these requirements may result in our having to dispose of certain investments quickly in order to prevent the loss of RIC status. Because most of our investments will be in private companies, and therefore will be relatively illiquid, any such dispositions could be made at disadvantageous prices and could result in substantial losses.
 
If we fail to qualify for or maintain RIC status or to meet the annual distribution requirement for any reason and are subject to corporate income tax, the resulting corporate taxes could substantially reduce our net assets, the amount of income available for distribution and the amount of our distributions.
 
We may not be able to pay you distributions, our distributions may not grow over time and a portion of our distributions may be a return of capital.
 
We intend to pay distributions to our stockholders out of assets legally available for distribution. We cannot assure you that we will achieve investment results that will allow us to make a specified level of cash distributions or year-to-year increases in cash distributions. Our ability to pay distributions might be adversely affected by, among other things, the impact of one or more of the risk factors described in this prospectus or any prospectus supplement. In addition, the inability to satisfy the asset coverage test applicable to us as a business development company can limit our ability to pay distributions. All distributions will be paid at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend on our earnings, our financial condition, maintenance of our RIC status, compliance with applicable business development company regulations and such other factors as our Board of Directors may deem relevant from time to time. We cannot assure you that we will pay distributions to our stockholders in the future.
 
When we make distributions, we will be required to determine the extent to which such distributions are paid out of current or accumulated earnings and profits. Distributions in excess of current and accumulated earnings and profits will be treated as a non-taxable return of capital to the extent of an investor’s basis in our stock and, assuming that an investor holds our stock as a capital asset, thereafter as a capital gain.
 
We may have difficulty paying our required distributions if we recognize income before or without receiving cash representing such income.
 
For federal income tax purposes, we include in income certain amounts that we have not yet received in cash, such as original issue discount or accruals on a contingent payment debt instrument, which may occur if we receive warrants in connection with the origination of a loan or possibly in other circumstances including with respect to equity investments in foreign corporations. Such original issue discount is included in income before we receive any


20


Table of Contents

corresponding cash payments. We also may be required to include in income certain other amounts that we do not receive in cash.
 
Since, in certain cases, we may recognize income before or without receiving cash representing such income, we may have difficulty meeting the annual distribution requirement necessary to be relieved of federal taxes on income and gains distributed to our stockholders. Accordingly, we may have to sell some of our investments at times and/or at prices we would not consider advantageous, raise additional debt or equity capital or forgo new investment opportunities for this purpose. If we are not able to obtain cash from other sources, we may fail to satisfy the annual distribution requirement and thus become subject to corporate-level income tax.
 
We may in the future choose to pay dividends in our own stock, in which case you may be required to pay tax in excess of the cash you receive.
 
We may distribute taxable dividends that are payable in part in our stock. Taxable stockholders receiving such dividends will be required to include the full amount of the dividend as ordinary income (or as long-term capital gain to the extent such distribution is properly reported as a capital gain dividend) to the extent of our current and accumulated earnings and profits for United States federal income tax purposes. As a result, a U.S. stockholder may be required to pay tax with respect to such dividends in excess of any cash received. If a U.S. stockholder sells the stock it receives as a dividend in order to pay this tax, the sales proceeds may be less than the amount included in income with respect to the dividend, depending on the market price of our stock at the time of the sale. Furthermore, with respect to non-U.S. stockholders, we may be required to withhold U.S. tax with respect to such dividends, including in respect of all or a portion of such dividend that is payable in stock. In addition, if a significant number of our stockholders determine to sell shares of our stock in order to pay taxes owed on dividends, any such sales may put downward pressure on the trading price of our stock.
 
In addition, as discussed elsewhere in this prospectus, our loans typically contain a payment-in-kind (“PIK”) interest provision. The PIK interest, computed at the contractual rate specified in each loan agreement, is added to the principal balance of the loan and recorded as interest income. To avoid the imposition of corporate-level tax on us, this non-cash source of income needs to be paid out to stockholders in cash distributions or, in the event that we determine to do so, in shares of our common stock, even though we have not yet collected and may never collect the cash relating to the PIK interest. As a result, if we distribute taxable dividends in the form of our common stock, we may have to distribute a stock dividend to account for PIK interest even though we have not yet collected the cash.
 
Our wholly-owned SBIC subsidiary may be unable to make distributions to us that will enable us to maintain RIC status, which could result in the imposition of an entity-level tax.
 
In order for us to continue to qualify for RIC tax treatment and to minimize corporate-level taxes, we are required to distribute substantially all of our net ordinary income and net capital gain income, including income from certain of our subsidiaries, which includes the income from our SBIC subsidiary. We are partially dependent on our SBIC subsidiary for cash distributions to enable us to meet the RIC distribution requirements. Our SBIC subsidiary may be limited by the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, and SBA regulations governing SBICs, from making certain distributions to us that may be necessary to maintain our status as a RIC. We may have to request a waiver of the SBA’s restrictions for our SBIC subsidiary to make certain distributions to maintain our RIC status. We cannot assure you that the SBA will grant such waiver and if our SBIC subsidiary is unable to obtain a waiver, compliance with the SBA regulations may result in loss of RIC tax treatment and a consequent imposition of an entity-level tax on us.
 
Changes in laws or regulations governing our operations may adversely affect our business or cause us to alter our business strategy.
 
We and our portfolio companies are subject to regulation at the local, state and federal level. New legislation may be enacted or new interpretations, rulings or regulations could be adopted, including those governing the types of investments we are permitted to make or that impose limits on our ability to pledge a significant amount of our assets to secure loans, any of which could harm us and our stockholders, potentially with retroactive effect.


21


Table of Contents

Additionally, any changes to the laws and regulations governing our operations relating to permitted investments may cause us to alter our investment strategy in order to avail ourselves of new or different opportunities. Such changes could result in material differences to the strategies and plans set forth in this prospectus and may result in our investment focus shifting from the areas of expertise of our investment adviser to other types of investments in which our investment adviser may have less expertise or little or no experience. Thus, any such changes, if they occur, could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and the value of your investment.
 
We have identified deficiencies in our internal control over financial reporting from time to time. Future control deficiencies could prevent us from accurately and timely reporting our financial results.
 
We have identified deficiencies in our internal control over financial reporting from time to time, including significant deficiencies and material weaknesses. A “significant deficiency” is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting that is less severe than a material weakness, yet important enough to merit attention by those responsible for oversight of a company’s financial reporting. A material weakness is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of a company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.
 
Our failure to identify deficiencies in our internal control over financial reporting in a timely manner or remediate any deficiencies, or the identification of material weaknesses or significant deficiencies in the future could prevent us from accurately and timely reporting our financial results.
 
Risks Relating to Our Investments
 
Our investments in portfolio companies may be risky, and we could lose all or part of our investment.
 
Investing in small and mid-sized companies involves a number of significant risks. Among other things, these companies:
 
  •  may have limited financial resources and may be unable to meet their obligations under their debt instruments that we hold, which may be accompanied by a deterioration in the value of any collateral and a reduction in the likelihood of us realizing any guarantees from subsidiaries or affiliates of our portfolio companies that we may have obtained in connection with our investments, as well as a corresponding decrease in the value of the equity components of our investments;
 
  •  may have shorter operating histories, narrower product lines, smaller market shares and/or significant customer concentrations than larger businesses, which tend to render them more vulnerable to competitors’ actions and market conditions, as well as general economic downturns;
 
  •  are more likely to depend on the management talents and efforts of a small group of persons; therefore, the death, disability, resignation or termination of one or more of these persons could have a material adverse impact on our portfolio company and, in turn, on us;
 
  •  generally have less predictable operating results, may from time to time be parties to litigation, may be engaged in rapidly changing businesses with products subject to a substantial risk of obsolescence, and may require substantial additional capital to support their operations, finance expansion or maintain their competitive position; and
 
  •  generally have less publicly available information about their businesses, operations and financial condition. If we are unable to uncover all material information about these companies, we may not make a fully informed investment decision, and may lose all or part of our investment.
 
In addition, in the course of providing significant managerial assistance to certain of our portfolio companies, certain of our officers and directors may serve as directors on the boards of such companies. To the extent that litigation arises out of our investments in these companies, our officers and directors may be named as defendants in such litigation, which could result in an expenditure of funds (through our indemnification of such officers and directors) and the diversion of management time and resources.


22


Table of Contents

An investment strategy focused primarily on privately held companies presents certain challenges, including the lack of available information about these companies.
 
We invest primarily in privately held companies. Generally, little public information exists about these companies, including typically a lack of audited financial statements and ratings by third parties. We must therefore rely on the ability of our investment adviser to obtain adequate information to evaluate the potential risks of investing in these companies. These companies and their financial information may not be subject to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and other rules that govern public companies. If we are unable to uncover all material information about these companies, we may not make a fully informed investment decision, and we may lose money on our investments. These factors could affect our investment returns.
 
If we make unsecured debt investments, we may lack adequate protection in the event our portfolio companies become distressed or insolvent and will likely experience a lower recovery than more senior debtholders in the event our portfolio companies defaults on their indebtedness.
 
We may make unsecured debt investments in portfolio companies in the future. Unsecured debt investments are unsecured and junior to other indebtedness of the portfolio company. As a consequence, the holder of an unsecured debt investment may lack adequate protection in the event the portfolio company becomes distressed or insolvent and will likely experience a lower recovery than more senior debtholders in the event the portfolio company defaults on its indebtedness. In addition, unsecured debt investments of small and mid-sized companies are often highly illiquid and in adverse market conditions may experience steep declines in valuation even if they are fully performing.
 
If we invest in the securities and obligations of distressed or bankrupt companies, such investments may be subject to significant risks, including lack of income, extraordinary expenses, uncertainty with respect to satisfaction of debt, lower-than expected investment values or income potentials and resale restrictions.
 
We are authorized to invest in the securities and other obligations of distressed or bankrupt companies. At times, distressed debt obligations may not produce income and may require us to bear certain extraordinary expenses (including legal, accounting, valuation and transaction expenses) in order to protect and recover our investment. Therefore, to the extent we invest in distressed debt, our ability to achieve current income for our stockholders may be diminished.
 
We also will be subject to significant uncertainty as to when and in what manner and for what value the distressed debt we invest in will eventually be satisfied (e.g., through a liquidation of the obligor’s assets, an exchange offer or plan of reorganization involving the distressed debt securities or a payment of some amount in satisfaction of the obligation). In addition, even if an exchange offer is made or plan of reorganization is adopted with respect to distressed debt held by us, there can be no assurance that the securities or other assets received by us in connection with such exchange offer or plan of reorganization will not have a lower value or income potential than may have been anticipated when the investment was made.
 
Moreover, any securities received by us upon completion of an exchange offer or plan of reorganization may be restricted as to resale. As a result of our participation in negotiations with respect to any exchange offer or plan of reorganization with respect to an issuer of distressed debt, we may be restricted from disposing of such securities.
 
The lack of liquidity in our investments may adversely affect our business.
 
We invest, and will continue to invest, in companies whose securities are not publicly traded, and whose securities will be subject to legal and other restrictions on resale or will otherwise be less liquid than publicly traded securities. In fact, all of our assets may be invested in illiquid securities. The illiquidity of these investments may make it difficult for us to sell these investments when desired. In addition, if we are required to liquidate all or a portion of our portfolio quickly, we may realize significantly less than the value at which we had previously recorded these investments. Our investments are usually subject to contractual or legal restrictions on resale or are otherwise illiquid because there is usually no established trading market for such investments. The illiquidity of most of our investments may make it difficult for us to dispose of them at a favorable price, and, as a result, we may suffer losses.


23


Table of Contents

We may not have the funds or ability to make additional investments in our portfolio companies.
 
After our initial investment in a portfolio company, we may be called upon from time to time to provide additional funds to such company or have the opportunity to increase our investment through the exercise of a warrant to purchase common stock. There is no assurance that we will make, or will have sufficient funds to make, follow-on investments. Any decisions not to make a follow-on investment or any inability on our part to make such an investment may have a negative impact on a portfolio company in need of such an investment, may result in a missed opportunity for us to increase our participation in a successful operation or may reduce the expected yield on the investment.
 
Our portfolio companies may incur debt that ranks equally with, or senior to, our investments in such companies.
 
We invest primarily in first and second lien debt issued by small and mid-sized companies. Our portfolio companies may have, or may be permitted to incur, other debt that ranks equally with, or senior to, the debt in which we invest. By their terms, such debt instruments may entitle the holders to receive payments of interest or principal on or before the dates on which we are entitled to receive payments with respect to the debt instruments in which we invest. Also, in the event of insolvency, liquidation, dissolution, reorganization or bankruptcy of a portfolio company, holders of debt instruments ranking senior to our investment in that portfolio company would typically be entitled to receive payment in full before we receive any distribution. After repaying such senior creditors, such portfolio company may not have any remaining assets to use for repaying its obligation to us. In the case of debt ranking equally with debt instruments in which we invest, we would have to share on an equal basis any distributions with other creditors holding such debt in the event of an insolvency, liquidation, dissolution, reorganization or bankruptcy of the relevant portfolio company.
 
The disposition of our investments may result in contingent liabilities.
 
Most of our investments will involve private securities. In connection with the disposition of an investment in private securities, we may be required to make representations about the business and financial affairs of the portfolio company typical of those made in connection with the sale of a business. We may also be required to indemnify the purchasers of such investment to the extent that any such representations turn out to be inaccurate or with respect to certain potential liabilities. These arrangements may result in contingent liabilities that ultimately yield funding obligations that must be satisfied through our return of certain distributions previously made to us.
 
There may be circumstances where our debt investments could be subordinated to claims of other creditors or we could be subject to lender liability claims.
 
Even though we have structured some of our investments as senior loans, if one of our portfolio companies were to go bankrupt, depending on the facts and circumstances, including the extent to which we actually provided managerial assistance to that portfolio company, a bankruptcy court might recharacterize our debt investment and subordinate all or a portion of our claim to that of other creditors. We may also be subject to lender liability claims for actions taken by us with respect to a borrower’s business or instances where we exercise control over the borrower. It is possible that we could become subject to a lender’s liability claim, including as a result of actions taken in rendering significant managerial assistance.
 
Second priority liens on collateral securing loans that we make to our portfolio companies may be subject to control by senior creditors with first priority liens. If there is a default, the value of the collateral may not be sufficient to repay in full both the first priority creditors and us.
 
Certain loans that we make to portfolio companies will be secured on a second priority basis by the same collateral securing senior secured debt of such companies. The first priority liens on the collateral will secure the portfolio company’s obligations under any outstanding senior debt and may secure certain other future debt that may be permitted to be incurred by the company under the agreements governing the loans. The holders of obligations secured by the first priority liens on the collateral will generally control the liquidation of and be entitled to receive proceeds from any realization of the collateral to repay their obligations in full before us. In addition, the


24


Table of Contents

value of the collateral in the event of liquidation will depend on market and economic conditions, the availability of buyers and other factors. There can be no assurance that the proceeds, if any, from the sale or sales of all of the collateral would be sufficient to satisfy the loan obligations secured by the second priority liens after payment in full of all obligations secured by the first priority liens on the collateral. If such proceeds are not sufficient to repay amounts outstanding under the loan obligations secured by the second priority liens, then we, to the extent not repaid from the proceeds of the sale of the collateral, will only have an unsecured claim against the company’s remaining assets, if any.
 
The rights we may have with respect to the collateral securing the loans we make to our portfolio companies with senior debt outstanding may also be limited pursuant to the terms of one or more intercreditor agreements that we enter into with the holders of senior debt. Under such an intercreditor agreement, at any time that obligations that have the benefit of the first priority liens are outstanding, any of the following actions that may be taken with respect to the collateral will be at the direction of the holders of the obligations secured by the first priority liens: the ability to cause the commencement of enforcement proceedings against the collateral; the ability to control the conduct of such proceedings; the approval of amendments to collateral documents; releases of liens on the collateral; and waivers of past defaults under collateral documents. We may not have the ability to control or direct such actions, even if our rights are adversely affected.
 
We generally do not and will not control our portfolio companies.
 
We do not, and do not expect to, control most of our portfolio companies, even though we may have board representation or board observation rights, and our debt agreements may contain certain restrictive covenants. As a result, we are subject to the risk that a portfolio company in which we invest may make business decisions with which we disagree and the management of such company, as representatives of the holders of their common equity, may take risks or otherwise act in ways that do not serve our interests as a debt investor. Due to the lack of liquidity for our investments in non-traded companies, we may not be able to dispose of our interests in our portfolio companies as readily as we would like or at an appropriate valuation. As a result, a portfolio company may make decisions that could decrease the value of our portfolio holdings.
 
Defaults by our portfolio companies would harm our operating results.
 
A portfolio company’s failure to satisfy financial or operating covenants imposed by us or other lenders could lead to defaults and, potentially, termination of its loans and foreclosure on its secured assets, which could trigger cross-defaults under other agreements and jeopardize a portfolio company’s ability to meet its obligations under the debt or equity securities that we hold. We may incur expenses to the extent necessary to seek recovery upon default or to negotiate new terms, which may include the waiver of certain financial covenants, with a defaulting portfolio company.
 
We may not realize gains from our equity investments.
 
Certain investments that we have made in the past and may make in the future include warrants or other equity securities. In addition, we have made in the past and may make in the future direct equity investments in companies. Our goal is ultimately to realize gains upon our disposition of such equity interests. However, the equity interests we receive may not appreciate in value and, in fact, may decline in value. Accordingly, we may not be able to realize gains from our equity interests, and any gains that we do realize on the disposition of any equity interests may not be sufficient to offset any other losses we experience. We also may be unable to realize any value if a portfolio company does not have a liquidity event, such as a sale of the business, recapitalization or public offering, which would allow us to sell the underlying equity interests. We often seek puts or similar rights to give us the right to sell our equity securities back to the portfolio company issuer. We may be unable to exercise these puts rights for the consideration provided in our investment documents if the issuer is in financial distress.
 
We are subject to certain risks associated with foreign investments.
 
We may make investments in foreign companies. Investing in foreign companies may expose us to additional risks not typically associated with investing in U.S. companies. These risks include changes in foreign exchange


25


Table of Contents

rates, exchange control regulations, political and social instability, expropriation, imposition of foreign taxes, less liquid markets and less available information than is generally the case in the U.S., higher transaction costs, less government supervision of exchanges, brokers and issuers, less developed bankruptcy laws, difficulty in enforcing contractual obligations, lack of uniform accounting and auditing standards and greater price volatility.
 
Our success will depend, in part, on our ability to anticipate and effectively manage these and other risks. We cannot assure you that these and other factors will not have a material adverse effect on our business as a whole.
 
We may expose ourselves to risks if we engage in hedging transactions.
 
We have and may in the future enter into hedging transactions, which may expose us to risks associated with such transactions. We may utilize instruments such as forward contracts and interest rate swaps, caps, collars and floors to seek to hedge against fluctuations in the relative values of our portfolio positions and amounts due under our credit facilities from changes in market interest rates. Use of these hedging instruments may include counterparty credit risk. Utilizing such hedging instruments does not eliminate the possibility of fluctuations in the values of such positions and amounts due under our credit facilities or prevent losses if the values of such positions decline. However, such hedging can establish other positions designed to gain from those same developments, thereby offsetting the decline in the value of such portfolio positions. Such hedging transactions may also limit the opportunity for gain if the values of the underlying portfolio positions should increase. Moreover, it may not be possible to hedge against an interest rate fluctuation that is so generally anticipated that we are not able to enter into a hedging transaction at an acceptable price.
 
The success of our hedging transactions will depend on our ability to correctly predict movements and interest rates. Therefore, while we may enter into such transactions to seek to reduce interest rate risks, unanticipated changes in interest rates may result in poorer overall investment performance than if we had not engaged in any such hedging transactions. In addition, the degree of correlation between price movements of the instruments used in a hedging strategy and price movements in the portfolio positions being hedged may vary. Moreover, for a variety of reasons, we may not seek to establish a perfect correlation between such hedging instruments and the portfolio holdings or credit facilities being hedged. Any such imperfect correlation may prevent us from achieving the intended hedge and expose us to risk of loss. See also “— Changes in interest rates may affect our cost of capital and net investment income.”
 
Risks Relating to an Offering of Our Common Stock
 
Shares of closed-end investment companies, including business development companies, may trade at a discount to their net asset value.
 
Shares of closed-end investment companies, including business development companies, may trade at a discount from net asset value. This characteristic of closed-end investment companies and business development companies is separate and distinct from the risk that our net asset value per share may decline. We cannot predict whether our common stock will trade at, above or below net asset value.
 
We may be unable to invest a significant portion of the net proceeds of this offering on acceptable terms within an attractive timeframe.
 
Delays in investing the net proceeds raised in an offering may cause our performance to be worse than that of other fully invested business development companies or other lenders or investors pursuing comparable investment strategies. We cannot assure you that we will be able to identify any investments that meet our investment objective or that any investment that we make will produce a positive return. We may be unable to invest the net proceeds of any offering on acceptable terms within the time period that we anticipate or at all, which could harm our financial condition and operating results.
 
We anticipate that, depending on market conditions, it may take us a substantial period of time to invest substantially all of the net proceeds of any offering in securities meeting our investment objective. During this period, we will invest the net proceeds of an offering primarily in cash, cash equivalents, U.S. government securities, repurchase agreements and high-quality debt instruments maturing in one year or less from the time of


26


Table of Contents

investment, which may produce returns that are significantly lower than the returns which we expect to achieve when our portfolio is fully invested in securities meeting our investment objective. As a result, any distributions that we pay during this period may be substantially lower than the distributions that we may be able to pay when our portfolio is fully invested in securities meeting our investment objective. In addition, until such time as the net proceeds of an offering are invested in securities meeting our investment objective, the market price for our common stock may decline. Thus, the initial return on your investment may be lower than when, if ever, our portfolio is fully invested in securities meeting our investment objective.
 
Investing in our common stock may involve an above average degree of risk.
 
The investments we make in accordance with our investment objective may result in a higher amount of risk than alternative investment options and a higher risk of volatility or loss of principal. Our investments in portfolio companies involve higher levels of risk, and therefore, an investment in our shares may not be suitable for someone with lower risk tolerance.
 
The market price of our common stock may fluctuate significantly.
 
The market price and liquidity of the market for shares of our common stock may be significantly affected by numerous factors, some of which are beyond our control and may not be directly related to our operating performance. These factors include:
 
  •  significant volatility in the market price and trading volume of securities of business development companies or other companies in our sector, which are not necessarily related to the operating performance of these companies;
 
  •  inability to obtain any exemptive relief that may be required by us from the SEC;
 
  •  changes in regulatory policies, accounting pronouncements or tax guidelines, particularly with respect to RICs, business development companies and SBICs;
 
  •  loss of our BDC or RIC status or our SBIC subsidiary’s status as an SBIC;
 
  •  changes in earnings or variations in operating results;
 
  •  changes in the value of our portfolio of investments;
 
  •  any shortfall in revenue or net income or any increase in losses from levels expected by investors or securities analysts;
 
  •  departure of our investment adviser’s key personnel; and
 
  •  general economic trends and other external factors.
 
Certain provisions of our restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws as well as the Delaware General Corporation Law could deter takeover attempts and have a material adverse impact on the price of our common stock.
 
Our restated certificate of incorporation and our amended and restated bylaws as well as the Delaware General Corporation Law contain provisions that may have the effect of discouraging a third party from making an acquisition proposal for us. These anti-takeover provisions may inhibit a change in control in circumstances that could give the holders of our common stock the opportunity to realize a premium over the market price for our common stock.


27


Table of Contents

 
SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
 
Some of the statements in this prospectus and any accompanying prospectus supplement constitute forward-looking statements because they relate to future events or our future performance or financial condition. The forward-looking statements contained in this prospectus and any accompanying prospectus supplement may include statements as to:
 
  •  our future operating results and dividend projections;
 
  •  our business prospects and the prospects of our portfolio companies;
 
  •  the impact of the investments that we expect to make;
 
  •  the ability of our portfolio companies to achieve their objectives;
 
  •  our expected financings and investments;
 
  •  the adequacy of our cash resources and working capital; and
 
  •  the timing of cash flows, if any, from the operations of our portfolio companies.
 
In addition, words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “expect” and “intend” indicate a forward-looking statement, although not all forward-looking statements include these words. The forward-looking statements contained in this prospectus, and any accompanying prospectus supplement, involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those implied or expressed in the forward-looking statements for any reason, including the factors set forth in “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this prospectus and any accompanying prospectus supplement. Other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially include:
 
  •  changes in the economy;
 
  •  risks associated with possible disruption in our operations or the economy generally due to terrorism or natural disasters; and
 
  •  future changes in laws or regulations (including the interpretation of these laws and regulations by regulatory authorities) and conditions in our operating areas, particularly with respect to business development companies, RICs and SBICs.
 
We have based the forward-looking statements included in this prospectus and will base the forward-looking statements included in any accompanying prospectus supplement on information available to us on the date of this prospectus and any accompanying prospectus supplement, as appropriate, and we assume no obligation to update any such forward-looking statements, except as required by law. Although we undertake no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, you are advised to consult any additional disclosures that we may make directly to you or through reports that we in the future may file with the SEC, including annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K. The forward-looking statements contained in this prospectus and any accompanying prospectus supplement are excluded from the safe harbor protection provided by Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and the forward looking statements contained in our periodic reports are excluded from the safe-harbor protection provided by Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or the “Exchange Act.”


28


Table of Contents

 
USE OF PROCEEDS
 
We intend to use substantially all of the net proceeds from selling our common stock to make investments in small and mid-sized companies in accordance with our investment objective and strategies described in this prospectus or any prospectus supplement, and for general corporate purposes. We may also use a portion of the net proceeds to reduce any of our outstanding borrowings. Pending such use, we will invest the net proceeds primarily in high quality, short-term debt securities consistent with our business development company election and our election to be taxed as a RIC. See “Regulation — Business Development Company Regulations — Temporary Investments.” Our ability to achieve our investment objective may be limited to the extent that the net proceeds from an offering, pending full investment, are held in interest-bearing deposits or other short-term instruments. See “Risk Factors — Risks Relating to an Offering of our Common Stock — We may be unable to invest a significant portion of the net proceeds of this offering on acceptable terms within an attractive timeframe” for additional information regarding this matter. The supplement to this prospectus relating to an offering will more fully identify the use of proceeds from such an offering.


29


Table of Contents

 
PRICE RANGE OF COMMON STOCK AND DISTRIBUTIONS
 
Our common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “FSC.” The following table sets forth, for each fiscal quarter during the last two most recently completed fiscal years and for the first fiscal quarter of 2011 and the second fiscal quarter of 2011 through March 28, 2011, the range of high and low sales prices of our common stock as reported on the New York Stock Exchange, the sales price as a percentage of our net asset value (NAV) and the dividends declared by us for each fiscal quarter.
 
                                                 
                Percentage of
  Percentage of
  Cash
        Price Range   High Sales
  Low Sales
  Dividend
    NAV(1)   High   Low   Price to NAV(2)   Price to NAV(2)   per Share(3)
 
Year ended September 30, 2009
                                               
First Quarter
  $ 11.86     $ 10.24     $ 5.02       86 %     42 %   $ 0.32  
Second Quarter
  $ 11.94     $ 8.48     $ 5.80       71 %     49 %   $ 0.38 (4)
Third Quarter
  $ 11.95     $ 10.92     $ 7.24       91 %     61 %   $ 0.25  
Fourth Quarter
  $ 10.84     $ 11.36     $ 9.02       105 %     83 %   $ 0.25  
Year ended September 30, 2010
                                               
First Quarter
  $ 10.82     $ 10.99     $ 9.35       102 %     86 %   $ 0.27  
Second Quarter
  $ 10.70     $ 12.13     $ 10.45       113 %     98 %   $ 0.30  
Third Quarter
    10.43     $ 13.64     $ 10.49       131 %     101 %   $ 0.32  
Fourth Quarter
  $ 10.43     $ 11.30     $ 9.79       108 %     94 %   $ 0.10  
Year ending September 30, 2011
                                               
First Quarter
  $ 10.44     $ 12.24     $ 10.94       119 %     105 %   $ 0.3198 (5)
Second Quarter (through
March 28, 2011)
    *     $ 13.95     $ 11.83       *       *     $ 0.3198 (6)
 
 
 * Not determinable at the time of filing.
 
(1) Net asset value per share is determined as of the last day in the relevant quarter and therefore may not reflect the net asset value per share on the date of the high and low sales prices. The net asset values shown are based on outstanding shares at the end of each period.
 
(2) Calculated as the respective high or low sales price divided by net asset value.
 
(3) Represents the dividend declared in the specified quarter. We have adopted an “opt out” dividend reinvestment plan for our common stockholders. As a result, if we declare a cash dividend, then stockholders’ cash dividends will be automatically reinvested in additional shares of our common stock, unless they specifically “opt out” of the dividend reinvestment plan so as to receive cash dividends. See “Dividend Reinvestment Plan.”
 
(4) Includes a special dividend of $0.05 declared on December 18, 2008 with a record date of December 30, 2008 and a payment date of January 29, 2009.
 
(5) From our initial public offering through the fourth fiscal quarter of 2010, we paid quarterly dividends, but in the first fiscal quarter of 2011 we began paying, and we intend to continue paying, monthly dividends to our stockholders. Our monthly dividends, if any, will be determined by our Board of Directors on a quarterly basis.
 
(6) On January 31, 2011, our Board of Directors declared the following dividends: $0.1066 per share, payable on April 29, 2011 to stockholders of record on April 1, 2011; $0.1066 per share, payable on May 31, 2011 to stockholders of record on May 2, 2011 and $0.1066 per share, payable on June 30, 2011 to stockholders of record on June 1, 2011.
 
The last reported price for our common stock on March 28, 2011 was $13.37 per share. As of March 28, 2011, we had 44 stockholders of record, which did not include stockholders for whom shares are held in nominee or street name.
 
Shares of business development companies may trade at a market price that is less than the value of the net assets attributable to those shares. The possibilities that our shares of common stock will trade at a discount from net asset value or at premiums that are unsustainable over the long term are separate and distinct from the risk that our


30


Table of Contents

net asset value will decrease. It is not possible to predict whether the common stock offered hereby will trade at, above, or below net asset value. Since our initial public offering in June 2008, our shares of common stock have at times traded at prices significantly less than our net asset value.
 
Our dividends, if any, are determined by our Board of Directors. We have elected to be treated for federal income tax purposes as a RIC under Subchapter M of the Code. As long as we qualify as a RIC, we will not be taxed on our investment company taxable income or realized net capital gains, to the extent that such taxable income or gains are distributed, or deemed to be distributed, to stockholders on a timely basis.
 
To maintain RIC tax treatment, we must, among other things, distribute at least 90% of our net ordinary income and realized net short-term capital gains in excess of realized net long-term capital losses, if any. Depending on the level of taxable income earned in a tax year, we may choose to carry forward taxable income in excess of current year distributions into the next tax year and pay a 4% excise tax on such income. Any such carryover taxable income must be distributed through a dividend declared prior to filing the final tax return related to the year which generated such taxable income. Please refer to “Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations” for further information regarding the consequences of our retention of net capital gains. We may, in the future, make actual distributions to our stockholders of our net capital gains. We can offer no assurance that we will achieve results that will permit the payment of any cash distributions and, if we issue senior securities, we may be prohibited from making distributions if doing so causes us to fail to maintain the asset coverage ratios stipulated by the 1940 Act or if distributions are limited by the terms of any of our borrowings. See “Regulation” and “Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations.”
 
We have adopted an “opt out” dividend reinvestment plan for our common stockholders. As a result, if we make a cash distribution, then stockholders’ cash distributions will be automatically reinvested in additional shares of our common stock, unless they specifically “opt out” of the dividend reinvestment plan so as to receive cash distributions.
 
On October 22, 2010, our Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program to acquire up to $20 million of our outstanding common stock. Stock repurchases under this program are to be made through the open market at times and in such amounts as our management deems appropriate, provided that the price is below the most recent net asset value per share. The stock repurchase program expires December 31, 2011 and may be limited or terminated by the Board of Directors at any time without prior notice.


31


Table of Contents

 
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
 
The information in this section contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Please see “Risk Factors” and “Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” for a discussion of the uncertainties, risks and assumptions associated with these statements. You should read the following discussion in conjunction with the financial statements and related notes and other financial information appearing elsewhere in this prospectus.
 
Overview
 
We are a specialty finance company that lends to and invests in small and mid-sized companies in connection with investments by private equity sponsors. Our investment objective is to maximize our portfolio’s total return by generating current income from our debt investments and capital appreciation from our equity investments.
 
We were formed as a Delaware limited partnership (Fifth Street Mezzanine Partners III, L.P.) on February 15, 2007. Effective as of January 2, 2008, Fifth Street Mezzanine Partners III, L.P. merged with and into Fifth Street Finance Corp. At the time of the merger, all outstanding partnership interests in Fifth Street Mezzanine Partners III, L.P. were exchanged for 12,480,972 shares of common stock in Fifth Street Finance Corp.
 
Our consolidated financial statements prior to January 2, 2008 reflect our operations as a Delaware limited partnership (Fifth Street Mezzanine Partners III, L.P.) prior to our merger with and into a corporation (Fifth Street Finance Corp.).
 
On June 17, 2008, we completed an initial public offering of 10,000,000 shares of our common stock at the offering price of $14.12 per share. Our shares are listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “FSC.”
 
On July 21, 2009, we completed a follow-on public offering of 9,487,500 shares of our common stock, which included the underwriters’ exercise of their over-allotment option, at the offering price of $9.25 per share.
 
On September 25, 2009, we completed a follow-on public offering of 5,520,000 shares of our common stock, which included the underwriters’ exercise of their over-allotment option, at the offering price of $10.50 per share.
 
On January 27, 2010, we completed a follow-on public offering of 7,000,000 shares of our common stock, which did not include the underwriters’ exercise of their over-allotment option, at the offering price of $11.20 per share. On February 25, 2010, we sold 300,500 shares of our common stock at the offering price of $11.20 per share upon the underwriters’ exercise of their over-allotment option in connection with this offering.
 
On June 21, 2010, we completed a follow-on public offering of 9,200,000 shares of our common stock, which included the underwriters’ exercise of their over-allotment option, at the offering price of $11.50 per share.
 
On December 7, 2010, we entered into an at-the-market equity offering sales agreement relating to shares of our common stock. Throughout the month of December 2010, we sold 429,110 shares of our common stock at an average offering price of $11.87 per share. We terminated the at-the-market equity offering sales agreement effective January 20, 2011 and did not sell any shares of our common stock pursuant thereto subsequent to December 31, 2010.
 
Current Market Conditions
 
Since mid-2007, the global financial markets have experienced stress, volatility, illiquidity, and disruption. This turmoil appears to have peaked in the fall of 2008, resulting in several major financial institutions becoming insolvent, being acquired, or receiving government assistance. While the turmoil in the financial markets appears to have abated somewhat, the global economy continues to experience economic uncertainty. Economic uncertainty impacts our business in many ways, including changing spreads, structures, and purchase multiples as well as the overall supply of investment capital.
 
Despite the economic uncertainty, our deal pipeline remains robust, with high quality transactions backed by private equity sponsors in small to mid-sized companies. As always, we remain cautious in selecting new


32


Table of Contents

investment opportunities, and will only deploy capital in deals which are consistent with our disciplined philosophy of pursuing superior risk-adjusted returns.
 
As evidenced by our recent investment activities, we expect to grow the business in part by increasing the average investment size when and where appropriate. At the same time, we expect to focus more on first lien transactions. Although we believe that we currently have sufficient capital available to fund investments, a prolonged period of market disruptions may cause us to reduce the volume of loans we originate and/or fund, which could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations. In this regard, because our common stock has at times traded at a price below our then current net asset value per share and we are limited in our ability to sell our common stock at a price below net asset value per share, we may be limited in our ability to raise equity capital.
 
Critical Accounting Policies
 
FASB Accounting Standards Codification
 
The issuance of FASB Accounting Standards Codificationtm (the “Codification”) on July 1, 2009 (effective for interim or annual reporting periods ending after September 15, 2009), changes the way that U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) are referenced. Beginning on that date, the Codification officially became the single source of authoritative nongovernmental GAAP; however, SEC registrants must also consider rules, regulations, and interpretive guidance issued by the SEC or its staff. The switch affects the way companies refer to GAAP in financial statements and in their accounting policies. References to standards will consist solely of the number used in the Codification’s structural organization.
 
Consistent with the effective date of the Codification, financial statements for periods ending after September 15, 2009, refer to the Codification structure, not pre-Codification historical GAAP.
 
Basis of Presentation
 
Effective January 2, 2008, Fifth Street Mezzanine Partners III, L.P. (the “Partnership”), a Delaware limited partnership organized on February 15, 2007, merged with and into Fifth Street Finance Corp. The merger involved the exchange of shares between companies under common control. In accordance with the guidance on exchanges of shares between entities under common control, our results of operations and cash flows for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008 are presented as if the merger had occurred as of October 1, 2007. Accordingly, no adjustments were made to the carrying value of assets and liabilities (or the cost basis of investments) as a result of the merger. Prior to January 2, 2008, references to Fifth Street are to the Partnership. After January 2, 2008, references to “Fifth Street,” “FSC,” “we” or “our” are to Fifth Street Finance Corp., unless the context otherwise requires. Fifth Street’s financial results for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2007 refer to the Partnership.
 
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions affecting amounts reported in the Consolidated Financial Statements. We have identified investment valuation and revenue recognition as our most critical accounting estimates. We continuously evaluate our estimates, including those related to the matters described below. These estimates are based on the information that is currently available to us and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates under different assumptions or conditions. A discussion of our critical accounting policies follows.
 
Investment Valuation
 
We are required to report our investments that are not publicly traded or for which current market values are not readily available at fair value. The fair value is deemed to be the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.
 
Under Accounting Standards Codification 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (“ASC 820”), which we adopted effective October 1, 2008, we perform detailed valuations of our debt and equity investments on an individual basis, using market based, income based, and bond yield approaches as appropriate. In general, we utilize a bond yield method for the majority of our investments, as long as it is appropriate. If, in our judgment, the


33


Table of Contents

bond yield approach is not appropriate, we may use the enterprise value approach, or, in certain cases, an alternative methodology potentially including an asset liquidation or expected recovery model.
 
Under the market approach, we estimate the enterprise value of the portfolio companies in which we invest. There is no one methodology to estimate enterprise value and, in fact, for any one portfolio company, enterprise value is best expressed as a range of fair values, from which we derive a single estimate of enterprise value. To estimate the enterprise value of a portfolio company, we analyze various factors, including the portfolio company’s historical and projected financial results. Typically, private companies are valued based on multiples of EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization), cash flows, net income, revenues, or in limited cases, book value. We generally require portfolio companies to provide annual audited and quarterly and monthly unaudited financial statements, as well as annual projections for the upcoming fiscal year.
 
Under the income approach, we generally prepare and analyze discounted cash flow models based on our projections of the future free cash flows of the business. Under the bond yield approach, we use bond yield models to determine the present value of the future cash flow streams of our debt investments. We review various sources of transactional data, including private mergers and acquisitions involving debt investments with similar characteristics, and assess the information in the valuation process.
 
Our Board of Directors undertakes a multi-step valuation process each quarter in connection with determining the fair value of our investments:
 
  •  Our quarterly valuation process begins with each portfolio company or investment being initially valued by the deal team within our investment adviser responsible for the portfolio investment;
 
  •  Preliminary valuations are then reviewed and discussed with the principals of our investment adviser;
 
  •  Separately, independent valuation firms engaged by our Board of Directors prepare preliminary valuations on a selected basis and submit reports to us;
 
  •  The deal team compares and contrasts its preliminary valuations to the preliminary valuations of the independent valuation firms;
 
  •  The deal team prepares a valuation report for the Valuation Committee of our Board of Directors;
 
  •  The Valuation Committee of our Board of Directors is apprised of the preliminary valuations of the independent valuation firms;
 
  •  The Valuation Committee of our Board of Directors reviews the preliminary valuations, and the deal team responds and supplements the preliminary valuations to reflect any comments provided by the Valuation Committee;
 
  •  The Valuation Committee of our Board of Directors makes a recommendation to the Board of Directors; and
 
  •  Our Board of Directors discusses valuations and determines the fair value of each investment in our portfolio in good faith.
 
The fair value of all of our investments at December 31, 2010, September 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009 was determined by our Board of Directors. Our Board of Directors is solely responsible for the valuation of our portfolio investments at fair value as determined in good faith pursuant to our valuation policy and our consistently applied valuation process.
 
Our Board of Directors has engaged independent valuation firms to provide us with valuation assistance. Upon completion of their processes each quarter, the independent valuation firms provide us with written reports regarding the preliminary valuations of selected portfolio securities as of the close of such quarter. We will continue to engage independent valuation firms to provide us with assistance regarding our determination of the fair value of selected portfolio securities each quarter; however, our Board of Directors is ultimately and solely responsible for determining the fair value of our investments in good faith.


34


Table of Contents

The portions of our portfolio valued, as a percentage of the portfolio at fair value, by independent valuation firms by period were as follows:
 
         
For the quarter ending December 31, 2007
    91.9 %
For the quarter ending March 31, 2008
    92.1 %
For the quarter ending June 30, 2008
    91.7 %
For the quarter ending September 30, 2008
    92.8 %
For the quarter ending December 31, 2008
    100.0 %
For the quarter ending March 31, 2009
    88.7 %(1)
For the quarter ending June 30, 2009
    92.1 %
For the quarter ending September 30, 2009
    28.1 %
For the quarter ending December 31, 2009
    17.2 %(2)
For the quarter ending March 31, 2010
    26.9 %
For the quarter ending June 30, 2010
    53.1 %
For the quarter ending September 30, 2010
    61.8 %
For the quarter ending December 31, 2010
    73.9 %
 
 
(1) 96.0% excluding our investment in IZI Medical Products, Inc., which closed on December 31, 2009 and therefore was not part of the independent valuation process
 
(2) 24.8% excluding four investments that closed in December 2009 and therefore were not part of the independent valuation process
 
Our $50 million credit facility with Bank of Montreal was terminated effective September 16, 2009. The facility required independent valuations for at least 90% of the portfolio on a quarterly basis. With the termination of this facility, this valuation test is no longer required. However, we still intend to have a portion of the portfolio valued by an independent third party on a quarterly basis, with a substantial portion being valued on an annual basis.
 
As of December 31, 2010, September 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009, approximately 92.9%, 86.5% and 72.0%, respectively, of our total assets represented investments in portfolio companies valued at fair value.
 
Revenue Recognition
 
Interest and Dividend Income
 
Interest income, adjusted for amortization of premium and accretion of original issue discount, is recorded on the accrual basis to the extent that such amounts are expected to be collected. We stop accruing interest on investments when it is determined that interest is no longer collectible. Distributions from portfolio companies are recorded as dividend income when the distribution is received.
 
Fee Income
 
We receive a variety of fees in the ordinary course of business. Certain fees, such as origination fees, are capitalized and amortized in accordance with ASC 310-20 Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs. In accordance with ASC 820, the net unearned fee income balance is netted against the cost and fair value of the respective investments. Other fees, such as servicing fees, are classified as fee income and recognized as they are earned on a monthly basis.
 
We have also structured exit fees across certain of our portfolio investments to be received upon the future exit of those investments. These fees are to be paid to us upon the sooner to occur of (i) a sale of the borrower or substantially all of the assets of the borrower, (ii) the maturity date of the loan, or (iii) the date when full prepayment of the loan occurs. Exit fees are fees which are earned and payable upon the exit of a debt security and, similar to a prepayment penalty, are not accrued or otherwise included in net investment income until received. The receipt of such fees as well as the timing of our receipt of such fees is contingent upon a successful exit event for each of the investments.


35


Table of Contents

Payment-in-Kind (PIK) Interest
 
Our loans typically contain a contractual PIK interest provision. The PIK interest, which represents contractually deferred interest added to the loan balance that is generally due at the end of the loan term, is generally recorded on the accrual basis to the extent such amounts are expected to be collected. We generally cease accruing PIK interest if there is insufficient value to support the accrual or if we do not expect the portfolio company to be able to pay all principal and interest due. Our decision to cease accruing PIK interest involves subjective judgments and determinations based on available information about a particular portfolio company, including whether the portfolio company is current with respect to its payment of principal and interest on its loans and debt securities; monthly and quarterly financial statements and financial projections for the portfolio company; our assessment of the portfolio company’s business development success, including product development, profitability and the portfolio company’s overall adherence to its business plan; information obtained by us in connection with periodic formal update interviews with the portfolio company’s management and, if appropriate, the private equity sponsor; and information about the general economic and market conditions in which the portfolio company operates. Based on this and other information, we determine whether to cease accruing PIK interest on a loan or debt security. Our determination to cease accruing PIK interest on a loan or debt security is generally made well before our full write-down of such loan or debt security. In addition, if it is subsequently determined that we will not be able to collect any previously accrued PIK interest, the fair value of our loans or debt securities would decline by the amount of such previously accrued, but uncollectible, PIK interest.
 
For a discussion of risks we are subject to as a result of our use of PIK interest in connection with our investments, see “Risk Factors — Risks Relating to Our Business and Structure — We may have difficulty paying our required distributions if we recognize income before or without receiving cash representing such income,” “— We may in the future choose to pay dividends in our own stock, in which case you may be required to pay tax in excess of the cash you receive” and “— Our incentive fee may induce our investment adviser to make speculative investments”. In addition, if it is subsequently determined that we will not be able to collect any previously accrued PIK interest, the fair value of our loans or debt securities would decline by the amount of such previously accrued, but uncollectible, PIK interest.
 
To maintain our status as a RIC, PIK income must be paid out to our stockholders in the form of dividends even though we have not yet collected the cash and may never collect the cash relating to the PIK interest. Accumulated PIK interest was $17.3 million and represented 2.3% of the fair value of our portfolio of investments as of December 31, 2010, $19.3 million or 3.4% as of September 30, 2010 and $12.1 million or 4.0% as of September 30, 2009. The net increase in loan balances as a result of contracted PIK arrangements are separately identified in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
 
The accrual of PIK interest on our debt investments increases the recorded cost basis of these investments in our financial statements and, as a result, increases the cost basis of these investments for purposes of computing the capital gains incentive fee payable by us to our investment adviser.
 
Portfolio Composition
 
Our investments principally consist of loans, purchased equity investments and equity grants in privately-held companies. Our loans are typically secured by either a first or second lien on the assets of the portfolio company and generally have terms of up to six years (but an expected average life of between three and four years). We are currently focusing our new debt origination efforts on first lien loans because we believe that the risk-adjusted returns from these loans are superior to second lien and unsecured loans at this time and offer superior credit quality. However, we may choose to originate second lien and unsecured loans in the future.


36


Table of Contents

A summary of the composition of our investment portfolio at cost and fair value as a percentage of total investments is shown in the following tables:
 
                 
    December 31,
    September 30,
 
    2010     2010  
Cost:
               
First lien debt
    84.85 %     72.61 %
Second lien debt
    12.80 %     25.42 %
Subordinated debt
    0.78 %     0.80 %
Purchased equity
    0.58 %     0.39 %
Equity grants
    0.92 %     0.75 %
Limited partnership interests
    0.07 %     0.03 %
                 
Total
    100.00 %     100.00 %
                 
 
                 
    December 31,
    September 30,
 
    2010     2010  
Fair value:
               
First lien debt
    86.53 %     73.84 %
Second lien debt
    11.35 %     24.45 %
Subordinated debt
    0.72 %     0.78 %
Purchased equity
    0.40 %     0.11 %
Equity grants
    0.94 %     0.79 %
Limited partnership interests
    0.06 %     0.03 %
                 
Total
    100.00 %     100.00 %
                 
 
The industry composition of our portfolio at cost and fair value as a percentage of total investments were as follows:
 
                 
    December 31,
    September 30,
 
    2010     2010  
Cost:
               
Healthcare services
    19.97 %     14.76 %
IT consulting & other services
    6.60 %     0.00 %
Healthcare equipment
    6.21 %     8.02 %
Education services
    5.93 %     7.58 %
Internet software & services
    5.29 %     0.00 %
Construction and engineering
    5.18 %     4.22 %
Electronic equipment & instruments
    4.37 %     5.59 %
Home improvement retail
    4.32 %     5.51 %
Apparel, accessories & luxury goods
    4.22 %     3.97 %
Food distributors
    3.78 %     5.13 %
Fertilizers & agricultural chemicals
    3.49 %     4.51 %
Diversified support services
    3.40 %     4.43 %
Healthcare technology
    2.83 %     3.63 %
Human resources & employment services
    2.75 %     0.00 %
Food retail
    2.57 %     3.31 %
Electronic manufacturing services
    2.52 %     3.16 %
Media — Advertising
    2.39 %     3.35 %
Air freight and logistics
    2.33 %     2.36 %
Trucking
    2.26 %     2.88 %


37


Table of Contents

                 
    December 31,
    September 30,
 
    2010     2010  
Distributors
    1.78 %     2.25 %
Data processing and outsourced services
    1.75 %     2.21 %
Industrial machinery
    1.35 %     1.71 %
Leisure facilities
    0.90 %     1.16 %
Building products
    0.89 %     1.40 %
Construction materials
    0.86 %     2.95 %
Environmental & facilities services
    0.68 %     1.51 %
Housewares & specialties
    0.60 %     2.06 %
Restaurants
    0.55 %     2.11 %
Household products
    0.15 %     0.18 %
Multi-sector holdings
    0.05 %     0.02 %
Movies & entertainment
    0.03 %     0.03 %
                 
Total
    100.00 %     100.00 %
                 
Fair Value:
               
Healthcare services
    20.76 %     15.83 %
IT consulting & other services
    6.87 %     0.00 %
Healthcare equipment
    6.42 %     8.57 %
Education services
    5.50 %     7.47 %
Internet software & services
    5.49 %     0.00 %
Construction and engineering
    5.08 %     4.23 %
Electronic equipment & instruments
    4.40 %     5.83 %
Apparel, accessories & luxury goods
    4.39 %     4.18 %
Home improvement retail
    4.35 %     5.76 %
Food distributors
    3.84 %     5.38 %
Fertilizers & agricultural chemicals
    3.57 %     4.76 %
Diversified support services
    3.48 %     4.66 %
Healthcare technology
    2.96 %     3.93 %
Human resources & employment services
    2.87 %     0.00 %
Food retail
    2.64 %     3.50 %
Media — Advertising
    2.44 %     3.52 %
Air freight and logistics
    2.40 %     2.49 %
Electronic manufacturing services
    2.24 %     3.20 %
Distributors
    1.81 %     2.35 %
Data processing and outsourced services
    1.72 %     2.26 %
Industrial machinery
    1.44 %     1.81 %
Leisure facilities
    0.94 %     1.25 %
Building products
    0.88 %     1.21 %
Construction materials
    0.87 %     3.02 %
Environmental & facilities services
    0.68 %     0.91 %
Trucking
    0.62 %     0.82 %
Housewares & specialties
    0.55 %     0.66 %
Restaurants
    0.52 %     2.15 %
Household products
    0.15 %     0.19 %

38


Table of Contents

                 
    December 31,
    September 30,
 
    2010     2010  
Multi-sector holdings
    0.08 %     0.01 %
Movies & entertainment
    0.04 %     0.05 %
                 
Total
    100.00 %     100.00 %
                 
 
Portfolio Asset Quality
 
We employ a grading system to assess and monitor the credit risk of our investment portfolio. We rate all investments on a scale from 1 to 5. The system is intended to reflect the performance of the borrower’s business, the collateral coverage of the loan, and other factors considered relevant to making a credit judgment.
 
  •  Investment Rating 1 is used for investments that are performing above expectations and/or a capital gain is expected.
 
  •  Investment Rating 2 is used for investments that are performing substantially within our expectations, and whose risks remain neutral or favorable compared to the potential risk at the time of the original investment. All new investments are initially rated 2.
 
  •  Investment Rating 3 is used for investments that are performing below our expectations and that require closer monitoring, but where we expect no loss of investment return (interest and/or dividends) or principal. Companies with a rating of 3 may be out of compliance with financial covenants.
 
  •  Investment Rating 4 is used for investments that are performing below our expectations and for which risk has increased materially since the original investment. We expect some loss of investment return, but no loss of principal.
 
  •  Investment Rating 5 is used for investments that are performing substantially below our expectations and whose risks have increased substantially since the original investment. Investments with a rating of 5 are those for which some loss of principal is expected.
 
The following table shows the distribution of our investments on the 1 to 5 investment rating scale at fair value, as of December 31, 2010 and September 30, 2010:
 
                                                 
    December 31, 2010     September 30, 2010  
          Percentage of
    Leverage
          Percentage of
    Leverage
 
    Fair Value     Total Portfolio     Ratio     Fair Value     Total Portfolio     Ratio  
 
1
  $ 80,790,254       10.88 %     3.00     $ 89,150,457       15.81 %     2.97  
2
    620,901,779       83.63 %     3.40       424,494,799       75.29 %     4.31  
3
    21,672,872       2.92 %     11.16       18,055,528       3.20 %     13.25  
4
          0.00 %           23,823,120       4.23 %     8.13  
5
    19,030,430       2.57 %     NM (1)     8,297,412       1.47 %     NM (1)
                                                 
Total
  $ 742,395,335       100.00 %     3.25     $ 563,821,316       100.00 %     4.53  
                                                 
 
 
(1) Due to operating performance this ratio is not measurable and, as a result, is excluded from the total portfolio calculation.
 
We may from time to time modify the payment terms of our investments, either in response to current economic conditions and their impact on certain of our portfolio companies or in accordance with tier pricing provisions in certain loan agreements. As of December 31, 2010, we had modified the payment terms of our investments in four portfolio companies. Such modified terms may include increased PIK interest provisions and reduced cash interest rates. These modifications, and any future modifications to our loan agreements may limit the amount of interest income that we recognize from the modified investments, which may, in turn, limit our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.

39


Table of Contents

 
Loans and Debt Securities on Non-Accrual Status
 
As of December 31, 2010, we had stopped accruing cash interest, PIK interest and original issue discount (“OID”) on three investments that did not pay all of their scheduled monthly cash interest payments for the period ended December 31, 2010. As of September 30, 2010, we had stopped accruing PIK interest and OID on five investments that did not pay all of their scheduled monthly cash interest payments for the year ended September 30, 2010. As of December 31, 2009, we had stopped accruing PIK interest and OID on five investments, including two investments that had not paid all of their scheduled monthly cash interest payments.
 
The non-accrual status of our portfolio investments as of December 31, 2010, September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 was as follows:
 
             
    December 31, 2010   September 30, 2010   December 31, 2009
 
Lighting by Gregory, LLC
  Cash non-accrual   Cash non-accrual   Cash non-accrual
CPAC, Inc. 
      PIK non-accrual
Martini Park, LLC
      PIK non-accrual
Nicos Polymers & Grinding, Inc. 
    Cash non-accrual   PIK non-accrual
MK Network, LLC
  Cash non-accrual   Cash non-accrual  
Premier Trailer Leasing, Inc. 
  Cash non-accrual   Cash non-accrual   Cash non-accrual
Vanguard Vinyl, Inc. 
    Cash non-accrual  
 
Non-accrual interest amounts related to the above investments for the three months ended December 31, 2010, the year ended September 30, 2010 and the three months ended December 31, 2009 were as follows:
 
                         
    Three Months Ended
    Year Ended
    Three Months Ended
 
    December 31, 2010     September 30, 2010     December 31, 2009  
 
Cash interest income
  $ 2,106,432     $ 5,804,101     $ 1,134,564  
PIK interest income
    240,390       1,903,005       468,882  
OID income
    30,138       328,792       103,911  
                         
Total
  $ 2,376,960     $ 8,035,898     $ 1,707,357  
                         
 
Discussion and Analysis of Results and Operations
 
Results of Operations
 
The principal measure of our financial performance is net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations, which includes net investment income (loss), net realized gain (loss) and net unrealized appreciation (depreciation). Net investment income is the difference between our income from interest, dividends, fees, and other investment income and total expenses. Net realized gain (loss) on investments is the difference between the proceeds received from dispositions of portfolio investments and their stated costs. Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) is the net change in the fair value of our investment portfolio and derivative instruments.
 
Comparison of the three months ended December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009
 
Total Investment Income
 
Total investment income includes interest and dividend income on our investments, fee income and other investment income. Fee income consists principally of loan and arrangement fees, administrative fees, unused fees, amendment fees, equity structuring fees, exit fees, prepayment fees and waiver fees. Other investment income consists primarily of dividend income received from certain of our equity investments and interest on cash and cash equivalents on deposit with financial institutions.
 
Total investment income for the three months ended December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 was $25.3 million and $13.2 million, respectively. For the three months ended December 31, 2010, this amount primarily consisted of $20.8 million of interest income from portfolio investments (which included $3.1 million of PIK interest), and $4.5 million of fee income. For the three months ended December 31, 2009, total investment


40


Table of Contents

income primarily consisted of $12.3 million of interest income from portfolio investments (which included $2.0 million of PIK interest), and $0.9 million of fee income.
 
The increase in our total investment income for the three months ended December 31, 2010 as compared to the three months ended December 31, 2009 was primarily attributable to higher average levels of outstanding debt investments, which was principally due to an increase of 13 investments in our portfolio in the year-over-year period, partially offset by scheduled amortization repayments received and other debt payoffs during the same period.
 
Expenses
 
Expenses (net of the permanently waived portion of the base management fee) for the three months ended December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 were $11.3 million and $4.9 million, respectively. Expenses increased for the three months ended December 31, 2010 as compared to the three months ended December 31, 2009 by $6.4 million, primarily as a result of increases in the base management fee, the incentive fee, interest expense, professional fees, and other general and administrative expenses.
 
The increase in base management and incentive fees resulted from an increase in our total assets as reflected in the growth of the investment portfolio, offset partially by our investment adviser’s unilateral decision to waive $0.7 million of the base management fee for the three months ended December 31, 2009. The increase in interest expense resulted from a $174.3 million increase in debt levels in the year-over-year period.
 
Net Investment Income
 
As a result of the $12.1 million increase in total investment income as compared to the $6.4 million increase in net expenses, net investment income for the three months ended December 31, 2010 reflected a $5.7 million, or 68.4%, increase compared to the three months ended December 31, 2009.
 
Realized Gain (Loss) on Sale of Investments
 
Net realized gain (loss) on investments is the difference between the proceeds received from dispositions of portfolio investments and their stated costs. Realized losses may also be recorded in connection with our determination that certain investments are considered worthless securities and/or meet the conditions for loss recognition per the applicable tax rules.
 
During the three months ended December 31, 2010, we recorded the following investment realization events:
 
  •  In November 2010, we restructured our investment in Best Vinyl, Inc., which resulted in a material modification of the terms of the loan agreement. As such, we recorded a realized loss in the amount of $1.7 million in accordance with ASC 470-50;
 
  •  In December 2010, we restructured our investment in Nicos Polymers & Grinding Inc., which resulted in a material modification of the terms of the loan agreement. As such, we recorded a realized loss in the amount of $3.9 million in accordance with ASC 470-50;
 
  •  In December 2010, we cancelled Lighting by Gregory, LLC’s entire Term Loan B balance and $1.5 million of Term Loan A. We recorded a realized loss on this investment in the amount of $7.8 million.
 
During the three months ended December 31, 2009, we received a cash payment in the amount of $0.1 million, representing a payment in full of all amounts due in connection with the cancellation of our loan agreement with American Hardwoods Industries, LLC. We recorded a $0.1 million reduction to the previously recorded $10.4 million realized loss on this investment.
 
Unrealized Appreciation or Depreciation on Investments and Interest Rate Swaps
 
Net unrealized appreciation or depreciation is the net change in the fair value of our investment portfolio and interest rate swaps during the reporting period, including the reversal of previously recorded unrealized appreciation or depreciation when gains or losses are realized.


41


Table of Contents

During the three months ended December 31, 2010, we recorded net unrealized appreciation of $16.8 million. This consisted of $10.3 million of reclassifications to realized losses, $5.5 million of net unrealized appreciation on debt investments, $0.3 million of net unrealized appreciation on equity investments and $0.7 million of net unrealized appreciation on interest rate swaps. During the three months ended December 31, 2009, we recorded net unrealized appreciation of $1.0 million. This consisted of $1.2 million of net unrealized appreciation on debt investments, partially offset by $0.2 million of net unrealized depreciation on equity investments.
 
Comparison of years ended September 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009
 
Total Investment Income
 
Total investment income for the years ended September 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009 was $70.5 million and $49.8 million, respectively. For the year ended September 30, 2010, this amount primarily consisted of $63.9 million of interest income from portfolio investments (which included $10.0 million of PIK interest), and $6.0 million of fee income. For the year ended September 30, 2009, this amount primarily consisted of $46.0 million of interest income from portfolio investments (which included $7.4 million of PIK interest), and $3.5 million of fee income.
 
The increase in our total investment income for the year ended September 30, 2010 as compared to the year ended September 30, 2009 was primarily attributable to a net increase of eight debt investments in our portfolio in the year-over-year period, partially offset by scheduled amortization repayments received and other debt payoffs during the same period.
 
Expenses
 
Expenses (net of the permanently waived portion of the base management fee) for the years ended September 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009 were $27.5 million and $18.4 million, respectively. Expenses increased for the year ended September 30, 2010 as compared to the year ended September 30, 2009 by $9.1 million, primarily as a result of increases in the base management fee, the incentive fee, interest expense, administrator expense, and other general and administrative expenses.
 
The increase in base management and incentive fees resulted from an increase in our total assets as reflected in the growth of the investment portfolio, offset partially by our investment adviser’s unilateral decision to waive $727,000 and $172,000 of the base management fee for the years ended September 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009, respectively.
 
Net Investment Income
 
As a result of the $20.7 million increase in total investment income as compared to the $9.1 million increase in total expenses, net investment income for the year ended September 30, 2010 reflected a $11.6 million, or 37.2%, increase compared to the year ended September 30, 2009.
 
Realized Gain (Loss) on Investments
 
Net realized gain (loss) on investments is the difference between the proceeds received from dispositions of portfolio investments and their stated costs. Realized losses may also be recorded in connection with our determination that certain investments are considered worthless securities and/or meet the conditions for loss recognition per the applicable tax rules.
 
During the year ended September 30, 2010, we recorded the following investment realization events:
 
  •  In October 2009, we received a cash payment in the amount of $0.1 million representing a payment in full of all amounts due in connection with the cancellation of our loan agreement with American Hardwoods Industries, LLC. We recorded a $0.1 million reduction to the previously recorded $10.4 million realized loss on the investment in American Hardwoods;
 
  •  In March 2010, we recorded a realized loss in the amount of $2.9 million in connection with the sale of a portion of our interest in CPAC, Inc.;


42


Table of Contents

 
  •  In August 2010, we received a cash payment of $7.6 million from Storyteller Theaters Corporation in full satisfaction of all obligations under the loan agreement. The debt investment was exited at par and no realized gain or loss was recorded on this transaction;
 
  •  In September 2010, we restructured our investment in Rail Acquisition Corp. Although the full amount owed under the loan agreement remained intact, the restructuring resulted in a material modification of the terms of the loan agreement. As such, we recorded a realized loss in the amount of $2.6 million in accordance with EITF Abstract Issue No. 96-19;
 
  •  In September 2010, we sold our investment in Martini Park, LLC and received a cash payment in the amount of $0.1 million. We recorded a realized loss on this investment in the amount of $4.0 million; and
 
  •  In September 2010, we exited our investment in Rose Tarlow, Inc. and received a cash payment in the amount of $3.6 million in full settlement of the debt investment. We recorded a realized loss on this investment in the amount of $9.3 million.
 
During the year ended September 30, 2009, we exited our investment in American Hardwoods Industries, LLC and recorded a realized loss of $10.4 million, and recorded a $4.0 million realized loss on our investment in CPAC, Inc. in connection with our determination that the investment was permanently impaired based on, among other things, our analysis of changes in the portfolio company’s business operations and prospects.
 
Net Change in Unrealized Appreciation or Depreciation
 
Net unrealized appreciation or depreciation is the net change in the fair value of our investment portfolio during the reporting period, including the reversal of previously recorded unrealized appreciation or depreciation when gains or losses are realized.
 
During the year ended September 30, 2010, we recorded net unrealized depreciation of $1.8 million. This consisted of $18.7 million of net unrealized depreciation on debt investments and $0.8 million of net unrealized depreciation on interest rate swaps, offset by $17.2 million of reclassifications to realized losses and $0.5 million of net unrealized appreciation on equity investments.
 
During the year ended September 30, 2009, we recorded net unrealized depreciation of $10.8 million. This consisted of $23.1 million of net unrealized depreciation on debt investments and $2.0 million of net unrealized depreciation on equity investments, offset by $14.3 million of reclassifications to realized losses.
 
Comparison of years ended September 30, 2009 and September 30, 2008
 
Total Investment Income
 
Total investment income for the years ended September 30, 2009 and September 30, 2008 was $49.8 million and $33.2 million, respectively. For the year ended September 30, 2009, this amount primarily consisted of $46.0 million of interest income from portfolio investments (which included $7.4 million of PIK interest), and $3.5 million of fee income. For the year ended September 30, 2008, this amount primarily consisted of $30.5 million of interest income from portfolio investments (which included $4.9 million of PIK interest), and $1.8 million of fee income.
 
The increase in our total investment income for the year ended September 30, 2009 as compared to the year ended September 30, 2008 was primarily attributable to a net increase of two debt investments in our portfolio in the year-over-year period, partially offset by debt repayments received during the same period.
 
Expenses
 
Expenses (net of the permanently waived portion of the base management fee) for the years ended September 30, 2009 and September 30, 2008 were $18.4 million and $13.1 million, respectively. Expenses increased for the year ended September 30, 2009 as compared to the year ended September 30, 2008 by $5.3 million, primarily as a result of increases in base management fee, incentive fees and other general and administrative expenses.


43


Table of Contents

The increase in base management fee resulted from an increase in our total assets as reflected in the growth of the investment portfolio offset partially by our investment adviser’s unilateral decision to waive $172,000 of the base management fee for the year ended September 30, 2009. Incentive fees were implemented effective January 2, 2008 when Fifth Street Mezzanine Partners III, L.P. merged with and into Fifth Street Finance Corp., and reflect the growth of our net investment income before such fees.
 
Net Investment Income
 
As a result of the $16.6 million increase in total investment income as compared to the $5.3 million increase in total expenses, net investment income for the year ended September 30, 2009 reflected a $11.3 million, or 55.7%, increase compared to the year ended September 30, 2008.
 
Realized Gain (Loss) on Investments
 
Net realized gain (loss) on investments is the difference between the proceeds received from dispositions of portfolio investments and their stated costs. During the year ended September 30, 2009, we exited our investment in American Hardwoods Industries, LLC and recorded a realized loss of $10.4 million, and recorded a $4.0 million realized loss on our investment in CPAC, Inc. in connection with our determination that the investment was permanently impaired based on, among other things, our analysis of changes in the portfolio company’s business operations and prospects. During the year ended September 30, 2008, we sold our equity investment in Filet of Chicken and realized a gain of $62,000.
 
Net Change in Unrealized Appreciation or Depreciation
 
Net unrealized appreciation or depreciation is the net change in the fair value of our investment portfolio during the reporting period, including the reversal of previously recorded unrealized appreciation or depreciation when gains or losses are realized. During the year ended September 30, 2009, we recorded net unrealized depreciation of $10.8 million. This consisted of $23.1 million of net unrealized depreciation on debt investments and $2.0 million of net unrealized depreciation on equity investments, offset by $14.3 million of reclassifications to realized losses. During the year ended September 30, 2008, we recorded net unrealized depreciation of $16.9 million. This consisted of $12.1 million of net unrealized depreciation on debt investments and $4.8 million of net unrealized depreciation on equity investments.
 
Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources
 
Cash Flows
 
We have a number of alternatives available to fund the growth of our investment portfolio and our operations, including, but not limited to, raising equity, increasing debt, or funding from operational cash flow. Additionally, we may reduce investment size by syndicating a portion of any given transaction.
 
For the three months ended December 31, 2010, we experienced a net decrease in cash and cash equivalents of $33.7 million. During that period, we used $159.4 million of cash in operating activities, primarily for the funding of $238.6 million of investments, partially offset by $57.6 million of principal payments received and $14.1 million of net investment income. During the same period cash provided by financing activities was $125.6 million, primarily consisting of $89.0 million of net borrowings under our credit facilities, $50.3 million of SBA borrowings, and $5.0 million of proceeds from issuances of our common stock, partially offset by $16.5 million of cash dividends paid, $0.2 million of offering costs paid and $2.0 million of deferred financing costs paid. We intend to fund our future distribution obligations through operating cash flow or with funds obtained through future equity offerings or credit facilities, as we deem appropriate.
 
For the year ended September 30, 2010, we experienced a net decrease in cash and cash equivalents of $36.4 million. During that period, we used $239.2 million of cash in operating activities, primarily for the funding of $325.5 million of investments, partially offset by $44.5 million of principal payments received and $43.0 million of net investment income. During the same period cash provided by financing activities was $202.7 million, primarily consisting of $179.1 million of proceeds from issuances of our common stock and $73.0 million of SBA


44


Table of Contents

borrowings, partially offset by $41.8 million of cash dividends paid, $1.3 million of offering costs paid and $6.3 million of deferred financing costs paid. We intend to fund our future distribution obligations through operating cash flow or with funds obtained through future equity offerings or credit facilities, as we deem appropriate.
 
As of December 31, 2010, we had $43.0 million in cash and cash equivalents, portfolio investments (at fair value) of $742.4 million, $4.7 million of interest and fees receivable, $123.3 million of SBA debentures payable, $89.0 of borrowings outstanding under our credit facilities, and unfunded commitments of $95.3 million.
 
As of September 30, 2010, we had $76.8 million in cash and cash equivalents, portfolio investments (at fair value) of $563.8 million, $3.8 million of interest and fees receivable, $73.0 million of SBA debentures payable, and unfunded commitments of $49.5 million.
 
Other Sources of Liquidity
 
We intend to continue to generate cash primarily from cash flows from operations, including interest earned from the temporary investment of cash in U.S. government securities and other high-quality debt investments that mature in one year or less, future borrowings and future offerings of securities. In the future, we may also securitize a portion of our investments in first and second lien senior loans or unsecured debt or other assets. To securitize loans, we would likely create a wholly-owned subsidiary and contribute a pool of loans to the subsidiary. We would then sell interests in the subsidiary on a non-recourse basis to purchasers and we would retain all or a portion of the equity in the subsidiary. Our primary use of funds is investments in our targeted asset classes and cash distributions to holders of our common stock.
 
Although we expect to fund the growth of our investment portfolio through the net proceeds from future equity offerings, including our dividend reinvestment plan, and issuances of senior securities or future borrowings, to the extent permitted by the 1940 Act, our plans to raise capital may not be successful. In this regard, because our common stock has at times traded at a price below our then-current net asset value per share and we are limited in our ability to sell our common stock at a price below net asset value per share, we may be limited in our ability to raise equity capital.
 
In addition, we intend to distribute between 90% and 100% of our taxable income to our stockholders in order to satisfy the requirements applicable to RICs under Subchapter M of the Code. See “Regulated Investment Company Status and Distributions” below. Consequently, we may not have the funds or the ability to fund new investments, to make additional investments in our portfolio companies, to fund our unfunded commitments to portfolio companies or to repay borrowings. In addition, the illiquidity of our portfolio investments may make it difficult for us to sell these investments when desired and, if we are required to sell these investments, we may realize significantly less than their recorded value.
 
Also, as a business development company, we generally are required to meet a coverage ratio of total assets, less liabilities and indebtedness not represented by senior securities, to total senior securities, which include all of our borrowings and any outstanding preferred stock, of at least 200%. This requirement limits the amount that we may borrow. As of December 31, 2010, we were in compliance with this requirement. To fund growth in our investment portfolio in the future, we anticipate needing to raise additional capital from various sources, including the equity markets and the securitization or other debt-related markets, which may or may not be available on favorable terms, if at all.
 
Finally, through a wholly-owned subsidiary, we sought and obtained a license from the SBA to operate an SBIC.
 
In this regard, on February 3, 2010, our wholly-owned subsidiary, Fifth Street Mezzanine Partners IV, L.P., received a license, effective February 1, 2010, from the SBA to operate as an SBIC under Section 301(c) of the Small Business Investment Act of 1958. SBICs are designated to stimulate the flow of private equity capital to eligible small businesses. Under SBA regulations, SBICs may make loans to eligible small businesses and invest in the equity securities of small businesses.


45


Table of Contents

The SBIC license allows our SBIC subsidiary to obtain leverage by issuing SBA-guaranteed debentures, subject to the issuance of a capital commitment by the SBA and other customary procedures. SBA-guaranteed debentures are non-recourse, interest only debentures with interest payable semi-annually and have a ten year maturity. The principal amount of SBA-guaranteed debentures is not required to be paid prior to maturity but may be prepaid at any time without penalty. The interest rate of SBA-guaranteed debentures is fixed on a semi-annual basis at a market-driven spread over U.S. Treasury Notes with 10-year maturities.
 
SBA regulations currently limit the amount that our SBIC subsidiary may borrow to a maximum of $150 million when it has at least $75 million in regulatory capital, receives a capital commitment from the SBA and has been through an examination by the SBA subsequent to licensing. As of December 31, 2010, our SBIC subsidiary had $75 million in regulatory capital. The SBA has issued a capital commitment to our SBIC subsidiary in the amount of $150 million, and $123.3 million of SBA debentures were outstanding as of December 31, 2010. $73.0 million of these debentures bore an interest rate of 3.50%, including the SBA annual charge of 0.285%, while the remainder do not yet have a locked interest rate.
 
We have received exemptive relief from the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) to permit us to exclude the debt of the SBIC subsidiary guaranteed by the SBA from the 200% asset coverage test under the 1940 Act. This allows us increased flexibility under the 200% asset coverage test.
 
Significant capital transactions that occurred from October 1, 2008 through December 31, 2010
 
The following table reflects the dividend distributions per share that our Board of Directors has declared on our common stock from October 1, 2008 through December 31, 2010:
 
                                         
            Amount
  Cash
  DRIP Shares
  DRIP Shares
Date Declared
 
Record Date
 
Payment Date
  per Share   Distribution   Issued   Value
 
December 9, 2008
  December 19, 2008   December 29, 2008   $ 0.32     $ 6.4 million       105,326     $ 0.8 million  
December 9, 2008
  December 30, 2008   January 29, 2009     0.33       6.6 million       139,995       0.8 million  
December 18, 2008
  December 30, 2008   January 29, 2009     0.05       1.0 million       21,211       0.1 million  
April 14, 2009
  May 26, 2009   June 25, 2009     0.25       5.6 million       11,776       0.1 million  
August 3, 2009
  September 8, 2009   September 25, 2009     0.25       7.5 million       56,890       0.6 million  
November 12, 2009
  December 10, 2009   December 29, 2009     0.27       9.7 million       44,420       0.5 million  
January 12, 2010
  March 3, 2010   March 30, 2010     0.30       12.9 million       58,689       0.7 million  
May 3, 2010
  May 20, 2010   June 30, 2010     0.32       14.0 million       42,269       0.5 million  
August 2, 2010
  September 1, 2010   September 29, 2010     0.10       5.2 million       25,425       0.3 million  
August 2, 2010
  October 6, 2010   October 27, 2010     0.10       5.2 million       24,850       0.3 million  
August 2, 2010
  November 3, 2010   November 24, 2010     0.11       5.7 million       26,569       0.3 million  
August 2, 2010
  December 1, 2010   December 29, 2010     0.11       5.7 million       28,238       0.3 million  
November 30, 2010
  January 4, 2011   January 31, 2011     0.1066       5.4 million       36,038       0.5 million  
November 30, 2010
  February 1, 2011   February 28, 2011     0.1066       5.5 million       29,072       0.4 million  
November 30, 2010
  March 1, 2011   March 31, 2011     0.1066                    


46


Table of Contents

The following table reflects shareholder transactions that occurred from October 1, 2008 through December 31, 2010:
 
                             
                Gross
                Proceeds
Date
 
Transaction
  Shares   Share Price   (Uses)
 
October 27, 2008
  Repurchase shares     39,000     $ 5.96     $ (0.2 million )
October 28, 2008
  Repurchase shares     39,000       5.89       (0.2 million )
July 21, 2009
  Public offering(1)     9,487,500       9.25       87.8 million  
September 25, 2009
  Public offering(1)     5,520,000       10.50       58.0 million  
January 27, 2010
  Public offering     7,000,000       11.20       78.4 million  
February 25, 2010
  Underwriters’ exercise of
over-allotment
    300,500       11.20       3.4 million  
June 21, 2010
  Public offering(1)     9,200,000       11.50       105.8 million  
December 2010
  At-the-market offering     429,110       11.87 (2)     5.1 million  
 
 
(1) Includes the underwriters’ full exercise of their over-allotment option
(2) Average offering price
 
Borrowings
 
On November 16, 2009, Fifth Street Funding, LLC, a consolidated wholly-owned bankruptcy remote, special purpose subsidiary (“Funding”), and we entered into a Loan and Servicing Agreement (“Agreement”), with respect to a three-year credit facility (“Wells Fargo facility”) with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (“Wells Fargo”), as successor to Wachovia Bank, National Association, Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, as administrative agent, each of the additional institutional and conduit lenders party thereto from time to time, and each of the lender agents party thereto from time to time, in the amount of $50 million, with an accordion feature which allowed for potential future expansion of the facility up to $100 million. The facility bore interest at LIBOR plus 4.0% per annum and had a maturity date of November 16, 2012.
 
On May 26, 2010, we amended the Wells Fargo facility to expand the borrowing capacity under that facility. Pursuant to the amendment, we received an additional $50 million commitment, thereby increasing the size of the facility from $50 million to $100 million, with an accordion feature that allows for potential future expansion of that facility from a total of $100 million up to a total of $150 million. In addition, the interest rate of the Wells Fargo facility was reduced from LIBOR plus 4% per annum to LIBOR plus 3.5% per annum, with no LIBOR floor, and the maturity date of the facility was extended from November 16, 2012 to May 26, 2013. The facility may be extended for up to two additional years upon the mutual consent of Wells Fargo and each of the lender parties thereto.
 
On November 5, 2010, we amended the Wells Fargo facility to, among other things, provide for the issuance from time to time of letters of credit for the benefit of our portfolio companies. The letters of credit are subject to certain restrictions, including a borrowing base limitation and an aggregate sublimit of $15.0 million.
 
In connection with the Wells Fargo facility, we concurrently entered into (i) a Purchase and Sale Agreement with Funding, pursuant to which we will sell to Funding certain loan assets we have originated or acquired, or will originate or acquire and (ii) a Pledge Agreement with Wells Fargo, pursuant to which we pledged all of our equity interests in Funding as security for the payment of Funding’s obligations under the Agreement and other documents entered into in connection with the Wells Fargo facility.
 
The Agreement and related agreements governing the Wells Fargo facility required both Funding and us to, among other things (i) make representations and warranties regarding the collateral as well as each of our businesses, (ii) agree to certain indemnification obligations, and (iii) comply with various covenants, servicing procedures, limitations on acquiring and disposing of assets, reporting requirements and other customary requirements for similar credit facilities. The Wells Fargo facility agreements also include usual and customary default provisions such as the failure to make timely payments under the facility, a change in control of Funding, and the failure by Funding or us to materially perform under the Agreement and related agreements governing the facility,


47


Table of Contents

which, if not complied with, could accelerate repayment under the facility, thereby materially and adversely affecting our liquidity, financial condition and results of operations.
 
The Wells Fargo facility is secured by all of the assets of Funding, and all of our equity interest in Funding. We intend to use the net proceeds of the Wells Fargo facility to fund a portion of our loan origination activities and for general corporate purposes. Each loan origination under the facility is subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions. We cannot be assured that Funding will be able to borrow funds under the Wells Fargo facility at any particular time or at all. As of December 31, 2010, we had $38.0 million of borrowings outstanding under the Wells Fargo facility.
 
On May 27, 2010, we entered into a three-year secured syndicated revolving credit facility (“ING facility”) pursuant to a Senior Secured Revolving Credit Agreement (“ING Credit Agreement”) with certain lenders party thereto from time to time and ING Capital LLC, as administrative agent. The ING facility allows for us to borrow money at a rate of either (i) LIBOR plus 3.5% per annum or (ii) 2.5% per annum plus an alternate base rate based on the greatest of the Prime Rate, Federal Funds Rate plus 0.5% per annum or LIBOR plus 1% per annum, and has a maturity date of May 27, 2013. The ING facility also allows us to request letters of credit from ING Capital LLC, as the issuing bank. The initial commitment under the ING facility is $90 million, and the ING facility includes an accordion feature that allows for potential future expansion of the facility up to a total of $150 million. The ING facility is secured by substantially all of our assets, as well as the assets of two of our wholly-owned subsidiaries, FSFC Holdings, Inc. and FSF/MP Holdings, Inc., subject to certain exclusions for, among other things, equity interests in our SBIC subsidiary and equity interests in Funding as further set forth in a Guarantee, Pledge and Security Agreement (“ING Security Agreement”) entered into in connection with the ING Credit Agreement, among FSFC Holdings, Inc., FSF/MP Holdings, Inc., ING Capital LLC, as collateral agent, and us. Neither our SBIC subsidiary nor Funding is party to the ING facility and their respective assets have not been pledged in connection therewith. The ING facility provides that we may use the proceeds and letters of credit under the facility for general corporate purposes, including acquiring and funding leveraged loans, mezzanine loans, high-yield securities, convertible securities, preferred stock, common stock and other investments.
 
Pursuant to the ING Security Agreement, FSFC Holdings, Inc. and FSF/MP Holdings, Inc. guaranteed the obligations under the ING Security Agreement, including our obligations to the lenders and the administrative agent under the ING Credit Agreement. Additionally, we pledged our entire equity interests in FSFC Holdings, Inc. and FSF/MP Holdings, Inc. to the collateral agent pursuant to the terms of the ING Security Agreement.
 
The ING Credit Agreement and related agreements governing the ING facility required FSFC Holdings, Inc., FSF/MP Holdings, Inc. and us to, among other things (i) make representations and warranties regarding the collateral as well as each of our businesses, (ii) agree to certain indemnification obligations, and (iii) agree to comply with various affirmative and negative covenants and other customary requirements for similar credit facilities. The ING facility documents also include usual and customary default provisions such as the failure to make timely payments under the facility, the occurrence of a change in control, and the failure by us to materially perform under the ING Credit Agreement and related agreements governing the facility, which, if not complied with, could accelerate repayment under the facility, thereby materially and adversely affecting our liquidity, financial condition and results of operations.
 
Each loan or letter of credit originated under the ING facility is subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions. We cannot be assured that we will be able to borrow funds under the ING facility at any particular time or at all.
 
As of December 31, 2010, we had $51.0 million of borrowings outstanding under the ING facility.
 
As of December 31, 2010, except for assets that were funded through our SBIC subsidiary, substantially all of our assets were pledged as collateral under the Wells Fargo facility or the ING facility.
 
Interest expense for the three months ended December 31, 2010, the year ended September 30, 2010 and the three months ended December 31, 2009 was $1.9 million, $1.9 million $0.1 million, respectively.


48


Table of Contents

The following table describes significant financial covenants with which we must comply under each of our credit facilities on a quarterly basis:
 
                 
Facility
 
Financial Covenant
 
Description
 
Target Value
  Reported Value(1)
 
Wells Fargo facility
  Minimum shareholders’ equity (inclusive of affiliates)   Net assets shall not be less than $200 million plus 75% of the aggregate net proceeds of all sales of equity interests after November 16, 2009   $338 million   $569 million
    Minimum shareholders’ equity (exclusive of affiliates)   Net assets exclusive of affiliates other than Funding shall not be less than $250 million   $250 million   $494 million
    Asset coverage ratio   Asset coverage ratio shall not be less than 2.00:1   2.00:1   2.78:1
ING facility
  Minimum shareholders’ equity   Net assets shall not be less than the greater of (a) 55% of total assets; and (b) $385 million plus 50% of the aggregate net proceeds of all sales of equity interests after February 24, 2010   $436 million   $569 million
    Asset coverage ratio   Asset coverage ratio shall not be less than 2.25:1   2.25:1   8.80:1
    Interest coverage ratio   Interest coverage ratio shall not be less than 2.50:1   2.50:1   43.18:1
    Eligible portfolio investments test   Aggregate value of (a) Cash and cash equivalents and (b) Portfolio investments rated 1, 2 or 3 shall not be less than $175 million   $175 million   $288 million
 
 
(1) As contractually required, we report financial covenants based on the last filed quarterly or annual report, in this case our Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2010.
 
The following table reflects credit facility and debenture transactions that occurred from October 1, 2008 through December 31, 2010. Amounts available and drawn are as of December 31, 2010:
 
                                                 
            Total
               
            Facility
  Upfront
      Amount
  Interest
            Amount   Fee Paid   Availability   Drawn   Rate
 
Bank of Montreal
  December 30, 2008   Renewed credit facility   $ 50 million     $ 0.3 million     $     $       LIBOR + 3.25%  
    September 16, 2009   Terminated credit facility                                        
Wells Fargo facility
  November 16, 2009   Entered into credit facility     50 million       0.8 million                       LIBOR + 4.00%  
    May 26, 2010   Expanded credit facility     100 million       0.9 million       91 million  (1)     38 million       LIBOR + 3.50%  
ING facility
  May 27, 2010   Entered into credit facility     90 million       0.8 million       90 million       51 million       LIBOR + 3.50%  
SBA
  February 16, 2010   Received capital commitment     75 million       0.8 million                          
    September 21, 2010   Received capital commitment     150 million       0.8 million       150 million       123.3 million       3.50% (2)  
 
 
(1) Availability to increase upon our decision to further collateralize the facility.
 
(2) Includes the SBA annual charge of 0.285%.


49


Table of Contents

 
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
 
We may be a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financial needs of our portfolio companies. As of December 31, 2010, our only off-balance sheet arrangements consisted of $95.3 million of unfunded commitments, which was comprised of $91.8 million to provide debt financing to certain of our portfolio companies and $3.6 million related to unfunded limited partnership interests. As of September 30, 2010, our only off-balance sheet arrangements consisted of $49.5 million, which was comprised of $46.7 million to provide debt financing to certain of our portfolio companies and $2.8 million related to unfunded limited partnership interests. Such commitments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit risk in excess of the amount recognized in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities and are not reflected on our Consolidated Statement of Assets and Liabilities.
 
Contractual Obligations
 
On February 3, 2010, our SBIC subsidiary received a license, effective February 1, 2010, from the SBA to operate as an SBIC. The SBIC license allows our SBIC subsidiary to obtain leverage by issuing SBA-guaranteed debentures, subject to the issuance of a capital commitment by the SBA and other customary procedures. SBA-guaranteed debentures are non-recourse, interest only debentures with interest payable semi-annually and have a ten year maturity. The principal amount of SBA-guaranteed debentures is not required to be paid prior to maturity but may be prepaid at any time without penalty. The interest rate of SBA-guaranteed debentures is fixed on a semi-annual basis at a market-driven spread over U.S. Treasury Notes with 10-year maturities. As of December 31, 2010, we had $123.3 million of SBA debentures payable. $73.0 million of these debentures bore an interest rate of 3.50%, including the SBA annual charge of 0.285%, while the remainder do not yet have a locked interest rate.
 
On November 16, 2009, we entered into the Wells Fargo facility in the amount of $50 million with an accordion feature, which allowed for potential future expansion of the Wells Fargo facility up to $100 million. The Wells Fargo facility bore interest at LIBOR plus 4% per annum and had a maturity date of November 26, 2012. On May 26, 2010, we amended the Wells Fargo facility to expand our borrowing capacity under that facility. Pursuant to the amendment, we received an additional $50 million commitment, thereby increasing the size of the Wells Fargo facility from $50 million to $100 million, with an accordion feature that allows for potential future expansion of that facility from a total of $100 million up to a total of $150 million. In addition, the interest rate of the Wells Fargo facility was reduced from LIBOR plus 4% per annum to LIBOR plus 3.5% per annum, with no LIBOR floor, and the maturity date of the facility was extended from November 16, 2012 to May 26, 2013. On November 5, 2010, we amended the Wells Fargo facility to, among other things, provide for the issuance from time to time of letters of credit for the benefit of our portfolio companies. The letters of credit are subject to certain restrictions, including a borrowing base limitation and an aggregate sublimit of $15.0 million.
 
On May 27, 2010, we entered into the ING facility, which allows for us to borrow money at a rate of either (i) LIBOR plus 3.5% per annum or (ii) 2.5% per annum plus an alternate base rate based on the greatest of the Prime Rate, Federal Funds Rate plus 0.5% per annum or LIBOR plus 1% per annum, and has a maturity date of May 27, 2013. The ING facility also allows us to request letters of credit from ING Capital LLC, as the issuing bank. The initial commitment under the ING facility is $90 million, and the ING facility includes an accordion feature that allows for potential future expansion of the facility up to a total of $150 million.
 
As of December 31, 2010, we had $51.0 million of borrowings outstanding under the ING facility and $38.0 million of borrowings outstanding under the Wells Fargo facility.
 
The table below reflects the following information pertaining to debt outstanding under the SBA debentures payable, the Wells Fargo facility and the ING facility:
 
                                 
            Weighted average debt outstanding
  Maximum debt outstanding
    Debt Outstanding as of
  Debt Outstanding as of
  for the three months ended
  for the three months ended
    September 30, 2010   December 31, 2010   December 31, 2010   December 31, 2010
 
SBA debentures payable
  $ 73,000,000     $ 123,300,000     $ 81,276,087     $ 123,300,000  
Wells Fargo facility
          38,000,000       16,380,435       75,000,000  
ING facility
          51,000,000       5,021,739       51,000,000  
Total debt
    73,000,000       212,300,000       102,678,261       234,300,000  


50


Table of Contents

 
The following table reflects our contractual obligations arising from the SBA debentures payable, the Wells Fargo facility and the ING facility:
 
                                         
    Payments Due by Period as of December 31, 2010
    Total   < 1 year   1-3 years   3-5 years   > 5 years
 
SBA debentures payable
  $ 123,300,000     $     $     $     $ 123,300,000  
Interest due on SBA debentures
    42,112,568       3,237,603       8,642,822       8,631,000       21,601,143  
Wells Fargo facility
    38,000,000             38,000,000              
Interest due on Wells Fargo facility
    5,266,012       2,179,039       3,086,972              
ING facility
    51,000,000             51,000,000              
Interest due on ING facility
    5,686,226       2,352,921       3,333,305              
Total
  $ 265,364,806     $ 7,769,563     $ 104,063,099     $ 8,631,000     $ 144,901,143  


51


Table of Contents

 
A summary of the composition of unfunded commitments (consisting of revolvers, term loans and limited partnership interests) as of December 31, 2010 and September 30, 2010 is shown in the table below:
 
                 
    December 31,
    September 30,
 
    2010     2010  
 
HealthDrive Corporation
  $ 1,500,000     $ 1,500,000  
IZI Medical Products, Inc. 
    2,500,000       2,500,000  
Trans-Trade, Inc. 
    4,000,000       500,000  
Riverlake Equity Partners II, LP (limited partnership interest)
    877,895       966,360  
Riverside Fund IV, LP (limited partnership interest)
    678,583       864,175  
ADAPCO, Inc. 
    5,750,000       5,750,000  
AmBath/ReBath Holdings, Inc. 
    1,500,000       1,500,000  
JTC Education, Inc. 
    14,000,000       9,062,453  
Tegra Medical, LLC
    4,000,000       4,000,000  
Vanguard Vinyl, Inc. 
          1,250,000  
Flatout, Inc. 
    1,500,000       1,500,000  
Psilos Group Partners IV, LP (limited partnership interest)
    1,000,000       1,000,000  
Mansell Group, Inc. 
    2,000,000       2,000,000  
NDSSI Holdings, Inc. 
    1,500,000       1,500,000  
Eagle Hospital Physicians, Inc. 
    2,500,000       2,500,000  
Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC
    4,000,000       3,623,148  
Epic Acquisition, Inc. 
    2,200,000       2,700,000  
Specialty Bakers, LLC
    4,000,000       2,000,000  
Rail Acquisition Corp. 
    5,040,865       4,798,897  
Bunker Hill Capital II (QP), L.P. (limited partnership interest)
    1,000,000        
Nicos Polymers & Grinding Inc. 
    500,000        
CRGT, Inc. 
    12,500,000        
Welocalize, Inc. 
    4,750,000        
Miche Bag, LLC
    5,000,000        
Dominion Diagnostics, LLC
    5,000,000        
Advanced Pain Management
    400,000        
DISA, Inc. 
    4,000,000        
Best Vinyl Fence & Deck, LLC
    1,000,000        
Saddleback Fence and Vinyl Products, Inc. 
    400,000        
Traffic Control & Safety Corporation
    2,250,000        
                 
Total
  $ 95,347,343     $ 49,515,033  
                 
 
Regulated Investment Company Status and Dividends
 
We elected, effective as of January 2, 2008, to be treated as a RIC under Subchapter M of the Code. As long as we qualify as a RIC, we will not be taxed on our investment company taxable income or realized net capital gains, to the extent that such taxable income or gains are distributed, or deemed to be distributed, to stockholders on a timely basis.
 
Taxable income generally differs from net income for financial reporting purposes due to temporary and permanent differences in the recognition of income and expenses, and generally excludes net unrealized appreciation or depreciation until realized. Dividends declared and paid by us in a year may differ from taxable income for that year as such dividends may include the distribution of current year taxable income or the distribution of


52


Table of Contents

prior year taxable income carried forward into and distributed in the current year. Distributions also may include returns of capital.
 
To maintain RIC tax treatment, we must, among other things, distribute, with respect to each taxable year, at least 90% of our investment company taxable income (i.e., our net ordinary income and our realized net short-term capital gains in excess of realized net long-term capital losses, if any). As a RIC, we are also subject to a federal excise tax, based on distributive requirements of our taxable income on a calendar year basis (e.g., calendar year 2011). We anticipate timely distribution of our taxable income within the tax rules; however, we expect to incur a de minimis U.S. federal excise tax for the calendar year 2010. We intend to distribute to our stockholders between 90% and 100% of our annual taxable income (which includes our taxable interest and fee income). However, in future periods, we will be partially dependent on our SBIC subsidiary for cash distributions to enable us to meet the RIC distribution requirements. Our SBIC subsidiary may be limited by the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, and SBA regulations governing SBICs, from making certain distributions to us that may be necessary to enable us to maintain our status as a RIC. We may have to request a waiver of the SBA’s restrictions for our SBIC subsidiary to make certain distributions to maintain our RIC status. We cannot assure you that the SBA will grant such waiver. Also, the covenants under the Wells Fargo facility could, under certain circumstances, restrict Fifth Street Funding, LLC from making distributions to us and, as a result, hinder our ability to satisfy the distribution requirement. Similarly, the covenants contained in the ING facility may prohibit us from making distributions to our stockholders, and, as a result, could hinder our ability to satisfy the distribution requirement. In addition, we may retain for investment some or all of our net taxable capital gains (i.e., realized net long-term capital gains in excess of realized net short-term capital losses) and treat such amounts as deemed distributions to our stockholders. If we do this, our stockholders will be treated as if they received actual distributions of the capital gains we retained and then reinvested the net after-tax proceeds in our common stock. Our stockholders also may be eligible to claim tax credits (or, in certain circumstances, tax refunds) equal to their allocable share of the tax we paid on the capital gains deemed distributed to them. To the extent our taxable earnings for a fiscal taxable year fall below the total amount of our dividends for that fiscal year, a portion of those dividend distributions may be deemed a return of capital to our stockholders.
 
We may not be able to achieve operating results that will allow us to make distributions at a specific level or to increase the amount of these distributions from time to time. In addition, we may be limited in our ability to make distributions due to the asset coverage test for borrowings applicable to us as a business development company under the 1940 Act and due to provisions in our credit facilities. If we do not distribute a certain percentage of our taxable income annually, we will suffer adverse tax consequences, including possible loss of our status as a RIC. We cannot assure stockholders that they will receive any distributions or distributions at a particular level.
 
Pursuant to a recent revenue procedure (Revenue Procedure 2010-12), or the Revenue Procedure, issued by the Internal Revenue Service, or IRS, the IRS has indicated that it will treat distributions from certain publicly traded RICs (including BDCs) that are paid part in cash and part in stock as dividends that would satisfy the RIC’s annual distribution requirements and qualify for the dividends paid deduction for federal income tax purposes. In order to qualify for such treatment, the Revenue Procedure requires that at least 10% of the total distribution be payable in cash and that each stockholder have a right to elect to receive its entire distribution in cash. If too many stockholders elect to receive cash, each stockholder electing to receive cash must receive a proportionate share of the cash to be distributed (although no stockholder electing to receive cash may receive less than 10% of such stockholder’s distribution in cash). This Revenue Procedure applies to distributions declared on or before December 31, 2012 with respect to taxable years ending on or before December 31, 2011. We have no current intention of paying dividends in shares of our stock.
 
Related Party Transactions
 
We have entered into an investment advisory agreement with Fifth Street Management LLC, our investment adviser. Fifth Street Management is controlled by Leonard M. Tannenbaum, its managing member and the chairman of our Board of Directors and our chief executive officer. Pursuant to the investment advisory agreement, fees payable to our investment adviser will be equal to (a) a base management fee of 2.0% of the value of our gross assets, which includes any borrowings for investment purposes, and (b) an incentive fee based on our performance. Our investment adviser agreed to permanently waive that portion of its base management fee attributable to our assets


53


Table of Contents

held in the form of cash and cash equivalents as of the end of each quarter beginning March 31, 2010. The incentive fee consists of two parts. The first part is calculated and payable quarterly in arrears and equals 20% of our “Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income” for the immediately preceding quarter, subject to a preferred return, or “hurdle,” and a “catch up” feature. The second part is determined and payable in arrears as of the end of each fiscal year (or upon termination of the investment advisory agreement) and equals 20% of our “Incentive Fee Capital Gains,” which equals our realized capital gains on a cumulative basis from inception through the end of the year, if any, computed net of all realized capital losses and unrealized capital depreciation on a cumulative basis, less the aggregate amount of any previously paid capital gain incentive fee.
 
The investment advisory agreement may be terminated by either party without penalty upon no fewer than 60 days’ written notice to the other. During the three months ended December 31, 2010, we accrued management and incentive fees payable to our investment adviser under the investment advisory agreement in the amount of $7.3 million.
 
Pursuant to the administration agreement with FSC, Inc., which is controlled by Mr. Tannenbaum, FSC, Inc. will furnish us with the facilities and administrative services necessary to conduct our day-to-day operations, including equipment, clerical, bookkeeping and recordkeeping services at such facilities. In addition, FSC, Inc. will assist us in connection with the determination and publishing of our net asset value, the preparation and filing of tax returns and the printing and dissemination of reports to our stockholders. We will pay FSC, Inc. our allocable portion of overhead and other expenses incurred by it in performing its obligations under the administration agreement, including a portion of the rent and the compensation of our chief financial officer and chief compliance officer and their respective staffs. FSC, Inc. has voluntarily determined to forgo receiving reimbursement for the services performed for us by our chief compliance officer. Although FSC, Inc. currently intends to forgo its right to receive such reimbursement, it is under no obligation to do so and may cease to do so at any time in the future. The administration agreement may be terminated by either party without penalty upon no fewer than 60 days’ written notice to the other. During the three months ended December 31, 2010, we paid FSC, Inc. $0.8 million under the administration agreement.
 
We have also entered into a license agreement with Fifth Street Capital LLC pursuant to which Fifth Street Capital LLC has agreed to grant us a non-exclusive, royalty-free license to use the name “Fifth Street.” Under this agreement, we will have a right to use the “Fifth Street” name, for so long as Fifth Street Management LLC or one of its affiliates remains our investment adviser. Other than with respect to this limited license, we will have no legal right to the “Fifth Street” name. Fifth Street Capital LLC is controlled by Mr. Tannenbaum, its managing member.
 
Recent Developments
 
On January 4, 2011, we closed a $19.0 million senior secured debt facility to support the acquisition of a technology-enabled home-delivery pharmacy. The investment is backed by a private equity sponsor and $17.0 million was funded at closing. The terms of this investment include a $2.0 million revolver at an interest rate of LIBOR + 6.0% per annum and a $17.0 million Term Loan at an interest rate of LIBOR + 10.5% per annum. This is a first lien facility with a scheduled maturity of five years.
 
On January 6, 2011, we closed a $14.0 million senior secured debt facility to support the acquisition of a provider of outsourced Medicaid eligibility services. The investment is backed by a private equity sponsor and $12.0 million was funded at closing. The terms of this investment include a $2.0 million revolver at an interest rate of LIBOR + 6.5% per annum with a 1.75% LIBOR floor, and a $12.0 million Term Loan at an interest rate of LIBOR + 7.5-10.0% per annum with a 1.75% LIBOR floor. This is a first lien facility with a scheduled maturity of five years.
 
On January 6, 2011, we closed a $20.0 million senior secured debt facility to support the acquisition of a manager and administrator of investment products. The investment is backed by a private equity sponsor and $11.7 million was funded at closing. The terms of this investment include a $20.0 million Term Loan at an interest rate of + 9.5% LIBOR per annum with a 2% LIBOR floor. This is a first lien facility with a scheduled maturity of five years.


54


Table of Contents

On January 14, 2011, we closed a $13.3 million senior secured debt facility to support the acquisition of a provider of non-destructive pipe testing services. The investment is backed by a private equity sponsor and $11.3 million was funded at closing. The terms of this investment include a $2.0 million revolver at an interest rate of LIBOR + 8.0% per annum with a 2% LIBOR floor, a $5.3 million Term Loan A at an interest rate of LIBOR + 8.0% per annum with a 2% LIBOR floor, and a $6.0 million Term Loan B at an interest rate of LIBOR + 12% per annum with a 2% LIBOR floor. This is a first lien facility with a scheduled maturity of five years.
 
On January 20, 2011, we closed a $10.0 million senior secured debt facility to support the acquisition of an acquirer and operator of specialty pharmaceutical companies. The investment is backed by a private equity sponsor and $10.0 million was funded at closing. The terms of this investment include a $10.0 million Term Loan at an interest rate of LIBOR + 6.25% per annum with a 2% LIBOR floor. This is a first lien facility with a scheduled maturity of five years.
 
On January 30, 2011, our Board of Directors declared the following dividends:
 
  •  $0.1066 per share, payable on April 29, 2011 to stockholders of record on April 1, 2011;
 
  •  $0.1066 per share, payable on May 31, 2011 to stockholders of record on May 2, 2011; and
 
  •  $0.1066 per share, payable on June 30, 2011 to stockholders of record on June 1, 2011.
 
On January 31, 2011, we paid a dividend in the amount of $0.1066 per share to stockholders of record on January 4, 2011.
 
On February 1, 2011, we closed a $35.0 million senior secured debt facility to support the acquisition of a distributor of branded homecare products. The investment is backed by a private equity sponsor and $32.9 million was funded at closing. The terms of this investment include a $6.4 million revolver at an interest rate of LIBOR + 5.0% per annum with a 1.5% LIBOR floor, an $8.6 million Senior Term Loan at an interest rate of LIBOR + 5.0% per annum with a 1.5% LIBOR floor and a $20.0 million unsecured Term Loan at an interest rate of 13.875% per annum. This facility has a scheduled maturity of five years for the revolver and Senior Term Loan and six years for the unsecured Term Loan.
 
On February 1, 2011, we closed an $11.5 million senior secured debt facility to support the expansion of credit to an outsourced provider of revenue cycle management services to healthcare providers. The investment is backed by a private equity sponsor and $11.5 million was funded at closing. The terms of this investment include an $11.5 million Term Loan at an interest rate of LIBOR + 5.25% per annum with a 1.75% LIBOR floor. This is a first lien facility with a scheduled maturity of approximately five years.
 
On February 4, 2011, we completed a follow-on public offering of 11,500,000 shares of our common stock, which included the underwriters’ exercise of their over-allotment option, at the offering price of $12.65 per share.
 
On February 24, 2011, we amended the ING facility to expand our borrowing capacity to $215 million. In addition, the ING facility’s accordion feature was increased to allow for potential future expansion up to a total of $300 million, the maturity date was extended to February 22, 2014, and, if we obtain a credit rating of BBB or the equivalent, the interest rate will be reduced to LIBOR plus 3.0% per annum, with no LIBOR floor.
 
On February 28, 2011, we amended the Wells Fargo facility to reduce our interest rate to LIBOR plus 3.0% per annum, with no LIBOR floor, and extend the maturity date of the facility to February 25, 2014.
 
On February 28, 2011, we paid a dividend in the amount of $0.1066 per share to stockholders of record on February 1, 2011.
 
On March 4, 2011, we closed a $35.0 million senior secured debt facility to support the acquisition of a designer and manufacturer of heavy equipment for oil and gas production. The investment is backed by a private equity sponsor and $35.0 million was funded at closing. The terms of this investment include a $35.0 million Term Loan at an interest rate of LIBOR + 9.0% per annum with a 1.75% LIBOR floor. This is a first lien facility with a scheduled maturity of 4.5 years.
 
On March 8, 2011, we closed a $25.0 million senior secured debt facility to support an add-on for a provider of homecare medical products and services. The investment is backed by a private equity sponsor and $25.0 million


55


Table of Contents

was funded at closing. The terms of this investment include a $25.0 million Term Loan at an interest rate of LIBOR + 9.0% per annum with a 1.75% LIBOR floor. This is a first lien facility with a scheduled maturity of approximately five years.
 
On March 23, 2011, we closed a $64.0 million senior secured debt facility to support the acquisition of an operator of specialty retail stores. The investment is backed by a private equity sponsor and $55.0 million was funded at closing, including the purchase of $1.0 million of equity. The terms of this investment include a $10.0 million revolver at an interest rate of LIBOR +7.5% per annum, a $26.0 million Term Loan A at an interest rate of LIBOR +7.5% per annum and a $28.0 million Term Loan B at an interest rate of LIBOR +10.25% per annum. This is a first lien facility with a scheduled maturity of five years.
 
In March 2011, our SBIC subsidiary locked in a fixed annual interest rate of 4.369%, including an SBA annual charge of 0.285%, on $65.3 million of its SBA-guaranteed debentures. Our SBIC subsidiary had previously locked in a fixed annual interest rate of 3.50%, including the SBA annual charge of 0.285%, on $73.0 million of its SBA-guaranteed debentures. As a result, we, through our SBIC subsidiary, had a total of $138.3 million of SBA-guaranteed debentures outstanding as of March 28, 2011, all of which had locked fixed annual interest rates.
 
In addition, we are also in the process of preparing an application to the SBA for a second SBIC license. If approved, this license would provide us with the capability to issue an additional $75 million of SBA-guaranteed debentures beyond the $150 million of SBA-guaranteed debentures we, through our wholly owned subsidiary, currently have the ability to issue. However, we cannot assure you that we will be successful in obtaining a second SBIC license from the SBA.
 
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
 
See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a description of recent accounting pronouncements, including the expected dates of adoption and the anticipated impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements.
 
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
 
We are subject to financial market risks, including changes in interest rates. Changes in interest rates may affect both our cost of funding and our interest income from portfolio investments, cash and cash equivalents and idle funds investments. Our risk management systems and procedures are designed to identify and analyze our risk, to set appropriate policies and limits and to continually monitor these risks and limits by means of reliable administrative and information systems and other policies and programs. Our investment income will be affected by changes in various interest rates, including LIBOR and prime rates, to the extent any of our debt investments include floating interest rates. The significant majority of our debt investments are made with fixed interest rates for the term of the investment. However, as of December 31, 2010, 50.0% of our debt investment portfolio (at fair value) and 48.5% of our debt investment portfolio (at cost) bore interest at floating rates. As of December 31, 2010, based on our applicable levels of floating-rate debt investments, a 1.0% change in interest rates would not have a material effect on our level of interest income from debt investments.
 
Based on our review of interest rate risk, we determine whether or not any hedging transactions are necessary to mitigate exposure to changes in interest rates. On August 16, 2010, we entered into an interest rate swap agreement that expires on August 15, 2013, for a total notional amount of $100 million, for the purposes of hedging the interest rate risk related to the Wells Fargo facility and the ING facility. Under the interest rate swap agreement, we will pay a fixed interest rate of 0.99% and receive a floating rate based on the prevailing one-month LIBOR.
 
Our investments are carried at fair value as determined in good faith by our Board of Directors in accordance with the 1940 Act (See “— Critical Accounting Policies — Investment Valuation”). Our valuation methodology utilizes discount rates in part in valuing our investments, and changes in those discount rates may have an impact on the valuation of our investments. Assuming no changes in our investment and capital structure, a hypothetical increase or decrease in discount rates of 100 basis points would increase or decrease our net assets resulting from operations by $17 million.


56


Table of Contents

 
BUSINESS
 
General
 
We are a specialty finance company that lends to and invests in small and mid-sized companies in connection with investments by private equity sponsors. We define small and mid-sized companies as those with annual revenues between $25 million and $250 million. Our investment objective is to maximize our portfolio’s total return by generating current income from our debt investments and capital appreciation from our equity investments. We are externally managed and advised by Fifth Street Management LLC, which we also refer to as our “investment adviser”.
 
As of December 31, 2010, we had originated $907.5 million of funded debt and equity investments and our portfolio totaled $742.4 million at fair value and was comprised of 45 investments, 41 of which were in operating companies and four of which were in private equity funds. The four investments in private equity funds represented less than 1% of the fair value of our assets at December 31, 2010. The 38 debt investments in our portfolio as of December 31, 2010 had a weighted average debt to EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization) multiple of 3.24x calculated at the time of origination of the investment. The weighted average annual yield of our debt investments as of December 31, 2010 was approximately 13.2%, of which 11.4% represented cash payments and 1.8% represented payment-in-kind, or PIK, interest.
 
Our investments generally range in size from $5 million to $75 million and are principally in the form of first and second lien debt investments, which may also include an equity component. We are currently focusing our origination efforts on first lien loans. As of December 31, 2010, substantially all of our debt investments were secured by first or second priority liens on the assets of our portfolio companies. Moreover, we held equity investments consisting of common stock, preferred stock, or other equity interests in 21 out of 45 portfolio companies as of December 31, 2010.
 
Fifth Street Mezzanine Partners III, L.P., our predecessor fund, commenced operations as a private partnership on February 15, 2007. Effective as of January 2, 2008, Fifth Street Mezzanine Partners III, L.P. merged with and into us. We were formed in late 2007 for the purpose of acquiring Fifth Street Mezzanine Partners III, L.P. and continuing its business as a public entity. We are an externally managed, closed-end, non-diversified management investment company that has elected to be regulated as a business development company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, or the 1940 Act.
 
As a business development company, we are required to comply with regulatory requirements, including limitations on our use of debt. We are permitted to, and expect to, finance our investments through borrowings. However, as a business development company, we are only generally allowed to borrow amounts such that our asset coverage, as defined in the 1940 Act, equals at least 200% after such borrowing. The amount of leverage that we employ will depend on our assessment of market conditions and other factors at the time of any proposed borrowing. See “Regulation — Business Development Company Regulations.”
 
We have also elected to be treated for federal income tax purposes as a regulated investment company, or RIC, under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code, or the Code. See “Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations — Taxation as a Regulated Investment Company.” As a RIC, we generally will not have to pay corporate-level federal income taxes on any net ordinary income or capital gains that we distribute to our stockholders if we meet certain source-of-income, distribution and asset diversification requirements.
 
In addition, we maintain a wholly-owned subsidiary that is licensed as a small business investment company, or SBIC, and regulated by the Small Business Administration, or the SBA. See “Regulation — Small Business Investment Company Regulations.” The SBIC license allows us, through our wholly-owned subsidiary, to issue SBA-guaranteed debentures. We have received exemptive relief from the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, to permit us to exclude the debt of our SBIC subsidiary guaranteed by the SBA from the definition of senior securities in the 200% asset coverage ratio we are required to maintain under the 1940 Act. Pursuant to the 200% asset coverage ratio limitation, we are permitted to borrow one dollar for every dollar we have in assets less all liabilities and indebtedness not represented by debt securities issued by us or loans obtained by us. For example, as of December 31, 2010, we had approximately $663.9 million in assets less all liabilities and indebtedness not


57


Table of Contents

represented by debt securities issued by us or loans obtained by us, which would permit us to borrow up to approximately $663.9 million, notwithstanding other limitations on our borrowings pursuant to our credit facilities.
 
As a result of our receipt of an exemption from the SEC for our SBA debt, we have increased capacity to fund up to $150 million (the maximum amount of SBA-guaranteed debentures an SBIC may currently have outstanding once certain conditions have been met) of investments with SBA-guaranteed debentures in addition to being able to fund investments with borrowings up to the maximum amount of debt that the 200% asset coverage ratio limitation would allow us to incur. As a result, we, in effect, are permitted to have a lower asset coverage ratio than the 200% asset coverage ratio limitation under the 1940 Act and, therefore, we can have more debt outstanding than assets to cover such debt. For example, we are able to borrow up to $150 million more than the approximately $663.9 million permitted under the 200% asset coverage ratio limit as of December 31, 2010. For additional information on SBA regulations that affect our access to SBA-guaranteed debentures, see “Risk Factors — Risks Relating to Our Business and Structure — Our SBIC subsidiary’s investment adviser has no prior experience managing an SBIC and any failure to comply with SBA regulations, resulting from our SBIC subsidiary’s investment adviser’s lack of experience or otherwise, could have a material adverse effect on our operations.”
 
The Investment Adviser
 
Our investment adviser is affiliated with Fifth Street Capital LLC, a private investment firm founded and managed by Leonard M. Tannenbaum who has led the investment of over $1.4 billion in small and mid-sized companies, including the investments made by us, since 1998. Mr. Tannenbaum and his respective private investment firms have acted as the lead (and often sole) first or second lien investor in over 80 investment transactions. The other investment funds managed by these private investment firms generally are fully committed and, other than follow-on investments in existing portfolio companies, are no longer making investments.
 
We benefit from our investment adviser’s ability to identify attractive investment opportunities, conduct diligence on and value prospective investments, negotiate investments and manage a diversified portfolio of those investments. The principals of our investment adviser have broad investment backgrounds, with prior experience at investment funds, investment banks and other financial services companies and have developed a broad network of contacts within the private equity community. This network of contacts provides our principal source of investment opportunities.
 
The principals of our investment adviser are Mr. Tannenbaum, our chief executive officer and our investment adviser’s managing partner, Bernard D. Berman, our president, chief compliance officer and secretary and a partner of our investment adviser, Ivelin M. Dimitrov, our co-chief investment officer and a partner of our investment adviser, Chad Blakeman, our co-chief investment officer, Juan E. Alva, a partner of our investment adviser, Casey J. Zmijeski, a partner of our investment adviser and William H. Craig, our chief financial officer.
 
Business Strategy
 
Our investment objective is to maximize our portfolio’s total return by generating current income from our debt investments and capital appreciation from our equity investments. We have adopted the following business strategy to achieve our investment objective:
 
  •  Capitalize on our investment adviser’s strong relationships with private equity sponsors.  Our investment adviser has developed an extensive network of relationships with private equity sponsors that invest in small and mid-sized companies. We believe that the strength of these relationships is due to a common investment philosophy, a consistent market focus, a rigorous approach to diligence and a reputation for delivering on commitments. In addition to being our principal source of originations, we believe that private equity sponsors provide significant benefits including incremental due diligence, additional monitoring capabilities and a potential source of capital and operational expertise for our portfolio companies.
 
  •  Focus on established small and mid-sized companies.  We believe that there are fewer finance companies focused on transactions involving small and mid-sized companies than larger companies, and that this is one factor that allows us to negotiate favorable investment terms. Such favorable terms include higher debt yields and lower leverage levels, more significant covenant protection and greater equity grants than typical of


58


Table of Contents

  transactions involving larger companies. We generally invest in companies with established market positions, seasoned management teams, proven products and services and strong regional or national operations. We believe that these companies possess better risk-adjusted return profiles than newer companies that are building management or in early stages of building a revenue base.
 
  •  Continue our growth of direct originations.  As of December 31, 2010, we directly originated 100% of our debt investments, although we may not directly originate 100% of our investments in the future. Over the last several years, the principals of our investment adviser have developed an origination strategy designed to ensure that the number and quality of our investment opportunities allows us to continue to directly originate substantially all of our investments. We believe that the benefits of direct originations include, among other things, our ability to control the structuring of investment protections and to generate origination and exit fees.
 
  •  Employ disciplined underwriting policies and rigorous portfolio management.  Our investment adviser has developed an extensive underwriting process which includes a review of the prospects, competitive position, financial performance and industry dynamics of each potential portfolio company. In addition, we perform substantial diligence on potential investments, and seek to invest along side private equity sponsors who have proven capabilities in building value. As part of the monitoring process, our investment adviser will analyze monthly and quarterly financial statements versus the previous periods and year, review financial projections, meet with management, attend board meetings and review all compliance certificates and covenants.
 
  •  Structure our debt investments to minimize risk of loss and achieve attractive risk-adjusted returns.  We structure our debt investments on a conservative basis with high cash yields, cash origination fees, low leverage levels and strong investment protections. As of December 31, 2010, the weighted average annualized yield of our debt investments was approximately 13.2%, which includes a cash component of 11.4%. Our debt investments have strong protections, including default penalties, information rights, board observation rights, and affirmative, negative and financial covenants, such as lien protection and prohibitions against change of control. We believe these protections, coupled with the other features of our investments described above, should allow us to reduce our risk of capital loss and achieve attractive risk adjusted returns; however, there can be no assurance that we will be able to successfully structure our investments to minimize risk of loss and achieve attractive risk-adjusted returns.
 
  •  Benefit from lower, fixed, long-term cost of capital.  The SBIC license held by our wholly-owned subsidiary allows it to issue SBA-guaranteed debentures. SBA-guaranteed debentures carry long-term fixed rates that are generally lower than rates on comparable bank and other debt. Because we expect lower cost SBA leverage to become a more significant part of our capital base through our SBIC subsidiary, our relative cost of debt capital may be lower than many of our competitors. In addition, the SBIC leverage that we receive through our SBIC subsidiary will represent a stable, long-term component of our capital structure that should permit the proper matching of duration and cost compared to our portfolio investments.
 
  •  Leverage the skills and experience of our investment adviser.  The principals of our investment adviser have broad investment backgrounds, with prior experience at private investment funds, investment banks and other financial services companies and they also have experience managing distressed companies. We believe that our investment adviser’s expertise in valuing, structuring, negotiating and closing transactions provides us with a competitive advantage by allowing us to provide financing solutions that meet the needs of our portfolio companies while adhering to our underwriting standards.
 
Investment Criteria
 
The principals of our investment adviser have identified the following investment criteria and guidelines for use in evaluating prospective portfolio companies and they use these criteria and guidelines in evaluating investment opportunities for us. However, not all of these criteria and guidelines were, or will be, met in connection with each of our investments.


59


Table of Contents

  •  Established companies with a history of positive operating cash flow.  We seek to invest in established companies with sound historical financial performance. We typically focus on companies with a history of profitability on an operating cash flow basis. We do not intend to invest in start-up companies or companies with speculative business plans.
 
  •  Ability to exert meaningful influence.  We target investment opportunities in which we will be the lead/sole investor in our tranche and in which we can add value through active participation, often through advisory positions.
 
  •  Private equity sponsorship.  We generally seek to invest in companies in connection with private equity sponsors who have proven capabilities in building value. We believe that a private equity sponsor can serve as a committed partner and advisor that will actively work with the company and its management team to meet company goals and create value. We assess a private equity sponsor’s commitment to a portfolio company by, among other things, the capital contribution it has made or will make in the portfolio company.
 
  •  Seasoned management team.  We generally will require that our portfolio companies have a seasoned management team, with strong corporate governance. We also seek to invest in companies that have proper incentives in place, including having significant equity interests, to motivate management to act in accordance with our interests.
 
  •  Defensible and sustainable business.  We seek to invest in companies with proven products and/or services and strong regional or national operations.
 
  •  Exit strategy.  We generally seek to invest in companies that we believe possess attributes that will provide us with the ability to exit our investments. We expect to exit our investments typically through one of three scenarios: (i) the sale of the company resulting in repayment of all outstanding debt, (ii) the recapitalization of the company through which our loan is replaced with debt or equity from a third party or parties or (iii) the repayment of the initial or remaining principal amount of our loan then outstanding at maturity. In some investments, there may be scheduled amortization of some portion of our loan which would result in a partial exit of our investment prior to the maturity of the loan.
 
Deal Origination
 
Our deal originating efforts are focused on building relationships with private equity sponsors that are focused on investing in the small and mid-sized companies that we target. We divide the country geographically into Eastern, Central and Western regions and emphasize active, consistent sponsor coverage. Over the last ten years, the investment professionals of our investment adviser have developed an extensive network of relationships with these private equity sponsors. We estimate that there are approximately 1,400 of such private equity firms and our investment adviser has active relationships with approximately 140 of them. An active relationship is one through which our investment adviser has received at least one investment opportunity from the private equity sponsor within the last year.
 
Our investment adviser reviewed over 500 potential investment transactions with private equity sponsors for the year ended September 30, 2010. All of the investment transactions that we have completed to date were originated through our investment adviser’s relationships with private equity sponsors. We believe that our investment adviser has a reputation as a reliable, responsive and efficient source of funding to support private equity investments. We believe that this reputation and the relationships of our investment adviser with private equity sponsors will provide us with significant investment opportunities.
 
Our origination process is designed to efficiently evaluate a large number of opportunities and to identify the most attractive of such opportunities. A significant number of opportunities that clearly do not fit our investment criteria are screened by the partners of our investment adviser when they are initially identified. If an originator believes that an opportunity fits our investment criteria and merits consideration, the investment is presented to our investment adviser’s Investment Committee. This is the first stage of our origination process, the “Review” stage. During this stage, the originator gives a preliminary description of the opportunity. This is followed by preliminary due diligence, from which an investment summary is created. The opportunity may be discussed several times by the full Investment Committee of our investment adviser, or subsets of that Committee. At any point in this stage, we


60


Table of Contents

may reject the opportunity, and, indeed, we have historically decided not to proceed with more than 80% of the investment opportunities reviewed by our investment adviser’s Investment Committee.
 
For the subset of opportunities that we decide to pursue, we issue preliminary term sheets and classify them in the “Term Sheet Issued” stage. This term sheet serves as a basis for negotiating the critical terms of a transaction. At this stage we begin our underwriting and investment approval process, as more fully described below. After the term sheet for a potential transaction has been fully negotiated, the transaction is presented to our investment adviser’s Investment Committee for approval. If the deal is approved, the term sheet is signed. Approximately half of the term sheets we issue result in an executed term sheet. Our underwriting and investment approval process is ongoing during this stage, during which we begin documentation of the loan. The final stage, “Closings,” culminates with the funding of an investment only after all due diligence is satisfactorily completed and all closing conditions, including the sponsor’s funding of its investment in the portfolio company, have been satisfied.
 
Underwriting
 
Underwriting Process and Investment Approval
 
We make our investment decisions only after consideration of a number of factors regarding the potential investment including, but not limited to: (i) historical and projected financial performance; (ii) company and industry specific characteristics, such as strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats; (iii) composition and experience of the management team; and (iv) track record of the private equity sponsor leading the transaction. Our investment adviser uses a proprietary scoring system that evaluates each opportunity. This methodology is employed to screen a high volume of potential investment opportunities on a consistent basis.
 
If an investment is deemed appropriate to pursue, a more detailed and rigorous evaluation is made along a variety of investment parameters, not all of which may be relevant or considered in evaluating a potential investment opportunity. The following outlines the general parameters and areas of evaluation and due diligence for investment decisions, although not all will necessarily be considered or given equal weighting in the evaluation process.
 
Management assessment
 
Our investment adviser makes an in-depth assessment of the management team, including evaluation along several key metrics:
 
  •  The number of years in their current positions;
 
  •  Track record;
 
  •  Industry experience;
 
  •  Management incentive, including the level of direct investment in the enterprise;
 
  •  Background investigations; and
 
  •  Completeness of the management team (lack of positions that need to be filled).
 
Industry dynamics
 
An evaluation of the industry is undertaken by our investment adviser that considers several factors. If considered appropriate, industry experts will be consulted or retained. The following factors are analyzed by our investment adviser:
 
  •  Sensitivity to economic cycles;
 
  •  Competitive environment, including number of competitors, threat of new entrants or substitutes;
 
  •  Fragmentation and relative market share of industry leaders;
 
  •  Growth potential; and
 
  •  Regulatory and legal environment.


61


Table of Contents

 
Business model and financial assessment
 
Prior to making an investment decision, our investment adviser will undertake a review and analysis of the financial and strategic plans for the potential investment. There is significant evaluation of and reliance upon the due diligence performed by the private equity sponsor and third party experts including accountants and consultants. Areas of evaluation include:
 
  •  Historical and projected financial performance;
 
  •  Quality of earnings, including source and predictability of cash flows;
 
  •  Customer and vendor interviews and assessments;
 
  •  Potential exit scenarios, including probability of a liquidity event;
 
  •  Internal controls and accounting systems; and
 
  •  Assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities.
 
Private equity sponsor
 
Among the most critical due diligence investigations is the evaluation of the private equity sponsor making the investment. A private equity sponsor is typically the controlling shareholder upon completion of an investment and as such is considered critical to the success of the investment. The private equity sponsor is evaluated along several key criteria, including:
 
  •  Investment track record;
 
  •  Industry experience;
 
  •  Capacity and willingness to provide additional financial support to the company through additional capital contributions, if necessary; and
 
  •  Reference checks.
 
Investments
 
We target debt investments that will yield meaningful current income and provide the opportunity for capital appreciation through equity securities. We typically structure our debt investments with the maximum seniority and collateral that we can reasonably obtain while seeking to achieve our total return target. In most cases, our debt investment will be collateralized by a first or second lien on the assets of the portfolio company. As of December 31, 2010, substantially all of our debt investments were secured by first or second priority liens on the assets of the portfolio company.
 
Debt Investments
 
We tailor the terms of our debt investments to the facts and circumstances of the transaction and prospective portfolio company, negotiating a structure that seeks to protect our rights and manage our risk while creating incentives for the portfolio company to achieve its business plan. A substantial source of return is monthly cash interest that we collect on our debt investments. As of December 31, 2010, we directly originated 100% of our loans, although we may not directly originate 100% of our investments in the future. We are currently focusing our new origination efforts on first lien loans. We believe that the risk-adjusted returns from these loans are superior to second lien investments and offer superior credit quality. However, we may choose to originate second lien and unsecured loans in the future.
 
  •  First Lien Loans.  Our first lien loans generally have terms of four to six years, provide for a variable or fixed interest rate, contain prepayment penalties and are secured by a first priority security interest in all existing and future assets of the borrower. Our first lien loans may take many forms, including revolving lines of credit, term loans and acquisition lines of credit.


62


Table of Contents

 
  •  Second Lien Loans.  Our second lien loans generally have terms of four to six years, primarily provide for a fixed interest rate, contain prepayment penalties and are secured by a second priority security interest in all existing and future assets of the borrower. Our second lien loans often include payment-in-kind, or PIK, interest, which represents contractual interest accrued and added to the principal that generally becomes due at maturity. As of December 31, 2010, all of our second lien loans had intercreditor agreements requiring a standstill period of no more than 180 days. During the standstill period, we are generally restricted from exercising remedies against the borrower or the collateral in order to provide the first lien lenders time to cure any breaches or defaults by the borrower.
 
  •  Unsecured Loans.  Our unsecured investments generally have terms of five to six years and provide for a fixed interest rate. We may make unsecured investments on a stand-alone basis, or in connection with a senior secured loan, a junior secured loan or a “one-stop” financing. Our unsecured investments may include payment-in-kind, or PIK, interest, which represents contractual interest accrued and added to the principal that generally becomes due at maturity, and an equity component, such as warrants to purchase common stock in the portfolio company.
 
We typically structure our debt investments to include covenants that seek to minimize our risk of capital loss. Our debt investments have strong protections, including default penalties, information rights, board observation rights, and affirmative, negative and financial covenants, such as lien protection and prohibitions against change of control. Our debt investments also have substantial prepayment penalties designed to extend the life of the average loan, which we believe will help to grow our portfolio.
 
Equity Investments
 
When we make a debt investment, we may be granted equity in the company in the same class of security as the sponsor receives upon funding. In addition, we may from time to time make non-control, equity co-investments in connection with private equity sponsors. We generally seek to structure our equity investments, such as direct equity co-investments, to provide us with minority rights provisions and event-driven put rights. We also seek to obtain limited registration rights in connection with these investments, which may include “piggyback” registration rights.
 
Private Equity Fund Investments
 
We make investments in the private equity funds of certain of our equity sponsors. In general, we make these investments where we have a long term relationship and are comfortable with the sponsor’s business model and investment strategy. As of December 31, 2010, we had investments in four private equity funds, which represented less than 1% of the fair value of our assets as of such date.
 
Portfolio Management
 
Active Involvement in our Portfolio Companies
 
As a business development company, we are obligated to offer to provide managerial assistance to our portfolio companies and to provide it if requested. In fact, we provide managerial assistance to our portfolio companies as a general practice and we seek investments where such assistance is appropriate. We monitor the financial trends of each portfolio company to assess the appropriate course of action for each company and to evaluate overall portfolio quality. We have several methods of evaluating and monitoring the performance of our investments, including but not limited to, the following:
 
  •  review of monthly and quarterly financial statements and financial projections for portfolio companies;
 
  •  periodic and regular contact with portfolio company management to discuss financial position requirements and accomplishments;
 
  •  attendance at board meetings;
 
  •  periodic formal update interviews with portfolio company management and, if appropriate, the private equity sponsor; and


63


Table of Contents

 
  •  assessment of business development success, including product development, profitability and the portfolio company’s overall adherence to its business plan.
 
Rating Criteria
 
In addition to various risk management and monitoring tools, we use an investment rating system to characterize and monitor the credit profile and our expected level of returns on each investment in our portfolio. We use a five-level numeric rating scale. The following is a description of the conditions associated with each investment rating:
 
  •  Investment Rating 1 is used for investments that are performing above expectations and/or a capital gain is expected.
 
  •  Investment Rating 2 is used for investments that are performing substantially within our expectations, and whose risks remain neutral or favorable compared to the potential risk at the time of the original investment. All new loans are initially rated 2.
 
  •  Investment Rating 3 is used for investments that are performing below our expectations and that require closer monitoring, but where we expect no loss of investment return (interest and/or dividends) or principal. Companies with a rating of 3 may be out of compliance with financial covenants.
 
  •  Investment Rating 4 is used for investments that are performing below our expectations and for which risk has increased materially since the original investment. We expect some loss of investment return, but no loss of principal.
 
  •  Investment Rating 5 is used for investments that are performing substantially below our expectations and whose risks have increased substantially since the original investment. Investments with a rating of 5 are those for which some loss of principal is expected.
 
In the event that we determine that an investment is underperforming, or circumstances suggest that the risk associated with a particular investment has significantly increased, we will undertake more aggressive monitoring of the effected portfolio company. While our investment rating system identifies the relative risk for each investment, the rating alone does not dictate the scope and/or frequency of any monitoring that we perform. The frequency of our monitoring of an investment is determined by a number of factors, including, but not limited to, the trends in the financial performance of the portfolio company, the investment structure and the type of collateral securing our investment, if any.
 
The following table shows the distribution of our investments on the 1 to 5 investment rating scale at fair value as of December 31, 2010:
 
                 
Investment Rating
  Fair Value     % of Portfolio  
 
1
  $ 80,790,254       10.9 %
2
    620,901,779       83.6 %
3
    21,672,872       2.9 %
4
          0.0 %
5
    19,030,430       2.6 %
                 
Total
  $ 742,395,335       100.0 %
                 
 
Exit Strategies/Refinancing
 
As of December 31, 2010, we had structured $7.6 million in aggregate exit fees across 10 portfolio investments to be received upon the future exit of those investments. We expect to exit our investments typically through one of three scenarios: (i) the sale of the company resulting in repayment of all outstanding debt, (ii) the recapitalization of the company in which our loan is replaced with debt or equity from a third party or parties or (iii) the repayment of the initial or remaining principal amount of our loan then outstanding at maturity. In some investments, there may be


64


Table of Contents

scheduled amortization of some portion of our loan which would result in a partial exit of our investment prior to the maturity of the loan.
 
Valuation of Portfolio Investments and Net Asset Value Determinations
 
As a business development company, we generally invest in illiquid securities including debt and equity investments of small and mid-sized companies. All of our investments are recorded at fair value as determined in good faith by our Board of Directors.
 
Authoritative accounting guidance defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Where available, fair value is based on observable market prices or parameters or derived from such prices or parameters. Where observable prices or inputs are not available or reliable, valuation techniques are applied. These valuation techniques involve some level of management estimation and judgment, the degree of which is dependent on the price transparency for the investments or market and the investments’ complexity.
 
In accordance with authoritative accounting guidance, we perform detailed valuations of our debt and equity investments on an individual basis, using market, income, and bond yield approaches as appropriate. In general, we utilize a bond yield method for the majority of our investments, as long as it is appropriate. If, in our judgment, the bond yield approach is not appropriate, we may use the enterprise value approach, or, in certain cases, an alternative methodology potentially including an asset liquidation or expected recovery model.
 
Under the market approach, we estimate the enterprise value of the portfolio companies in which we invest. There is no one methodology to estimate enterprise value and, in fact, for any one portfolio company, enterprise value is best expressed as a range of fair values, from which we derive a single estimate of enterprise value. To estimate the enterprise value of a portfolio company, we analyze various factors, including the portfolio company’s historical and projected financial results. Typically, private companies are valued based on multiples of EBITDA, cash flows, net income, revenues, or in limited cases, book value. We generally require portfolio companies to provide annual audited and quarterly and monthly unaudited financial statements, as well as annual projections for the upcoming fiscal year.
 
Under the income approach, we generally prepare and analyze discounted cash flow models based on projections of the future free cash flows of the business.
 
Under the bond yield approach, we use bond yield models to determine the present value of the future cash flow streams of our debt investments. We review various sources of transactional data, including private mergers and acquisitions involving debt investments with similar characteristics, and assess the information in the valuation process.
 
Our Board of Directors undertakes a multi-step valuation process each quarter in connection with determining the fair value of our investments:
 
  •  The quarterly valuation process begins with each portfolio company or investment being initially valued by the deal team within the investment adviser responsible for the portfolio investment;
 
  •  Preliminary valuations are then reviewed and discussed with the principals of the investment adviser;
 
  •  Separately, independent valuation firms engaged by our Board of Directors prepare preliminary valuations on a selected basis and submit the reports to us;
 
  •  The deal team compares and contrasts its preliminary valuations to the preliminary valuations of the independent valuation firms;
 
  •  The deal team prepares a valuation report for the Valuation Committee of our Board of Directors;
 
  •  The Valuation Committee of our Board of Directors is apprised of the preliminary valuations of the independent valuation firms;


65


Table of Contents

 
  •  The Valuation Committee of our Board of Directors reviews the preliminary valuations, and the deal team responds and supplements the preliminary valuations to reflect any comments provided by the Valuation Committee;
 
  •  The Valuation Committee of our Board of Directors makes a recommendation to the Board of Directors; and
 
  •  Our Board of Directors discusses valuations and determines the fair value of each investment in our portfolio in good faith.
 
The fair value of all of our investments at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2010 was determined by our Board of Directors. Our Board of Directors is solely responsible for the valuation of the portfolio investments at fair value as determined in good faith pursuant to our valuation policy and a consistently applied valuation process.
 
Our Board of Directors has engaged independent valuation firms to provide us with valuation assistance. Upon completion of their process each quarter, the independent valuation firms provide us with a written report regarding the preliminary valuations of selected portfolio securities as of the close of such quarter. We will continue to engage independent valuation firms to provide us with assistance regarding our determination of the fair value of selected portfolio securities each quarter; however, our Board of Directors is ultimately and solely responsible for determining the fair value of our investments in good faith.
 
The percentages of our portfolio at fair value for which independent valuation firms provided us with valuation assistance by period were as follows:
 
         
    Percentage of
 
    Portfolio at
 
    Fair Value  
 
For the quarter ending December 31, 2007
    91.9 %
For the quarter ending March 31, 2008
    92.1 %
For the quarter ending June 30, 2008
    91.7 %
For the quarter ending September 30, 2008
    92.8 %
For the quarter ending December 31, 2008
    100.0 %
For the quarter ending March 31, 2009
    88.7 %(1)
For the quarter ending June 30, 2009
    92.1 %
For the quarter ending September 30, 2009
    28.1 %
For the quarter ending December 31, 2009
    17.2 %(2)
For the quarter ending March 31, 2010
    26.9 %
For the quarter ending June 30, 2010
    53.1 %
For the quarter ending September 30, 2010
    61.8 %
For the quarter ending December 31, 2010
    73.9 %
 
 
(1) 96.0% excluding our investment in IZI Medical Products, Inc., which closed on June 30, 2009 and therefore was not part of the independent valuation process
 
(2) 24.8% excluding four investments that closed in December 2009 and therefore were not part of the independent valuation process
 
We intend to have valuation firms provide us with valuation assistance on a portion of our portfolio on a quarterly basis and a substantial portion of our portfolio on an annual basis.
 
Determination of fair values involves subjective judgments and estimates. The notes to our financial statements refer to the uncertainty with respect to the possible effect of such valuations, and any change in such valuations, on our financial statements.


66


Table of Contents

Quarterly Net Asset Value Determination
 
We determine the net asset value per share of our common stock on a quarterly basis. The net asset value per share of our common stock is equal to the value of our total assets minus liabilities and any preferred stock outstanding divided by the total number of shares of common stock outstanding.
 
Determinations in Connection with Certain Offerings
 
In connection with certain offerings of shares of our common stock, our board of directors or one of its committees will be required to make the determination that we are not selling shares of our common stock at a price below the then current net asset value per share of our common stock at the time at which the sale is made. Our board of directors or the applicable committee will consider the following factors, among others, in making such determination:
 
  •  the net asset value per share of our common stock most recently disclosed by us in the most recent periodic report that we filed with the SEC;
 
  •  our management’s assessment of whether any material change in the net asset value per share of our common stock has occurred (including through the realization of gains on the sale of our portfolio securities) during the period beginning on the date of the most recently disclosed net asset value per share of our common stock and ending two days prior to the date of the sale of our common stock; and
 
  •  the magnitude of the difference between the net asset value per share of our common stock most recently disclosed by us and our management’s assessment of any material change in the net asset value per share of our common stock since that determination, and the offering price of the shares of our common stock in the proposed offering.
 
This determination will not require that we calculate the net asset value per share of our common stock in connection with such offerings of shares of our common stock, but instead it will involve the determination by our board of directors or a committee thereof that we are not selling shares of our common stock at a price below the then current net asset value per share of our common stock at the time at which the sale is made.
 
Competition
 
We compete for investments with a number of business development companies and investment funds (including private equity funds and mezzanine funds), as well as traditional financial services companies such as commercial banks and other sources of financing. Many of these entities have greater financial and managerial resources than we do. We believe we are able to be competitive with these entities primarily on the basis of the experience and contacts of our management team, our responsive and efficient investment analysis and decision-making processes, the investment terms we offer, and our willingness to make smaller investments.
 
We believe that some of our competitors make loans with interest rates and returns that are comparable to or lower than the rates and returns that we target. Therefore, we do not seek to compete solely on the interest rates and returns that we offer to potential portfolio companies. For additional information concerning the competitive risks we face, see “Risk Factors — Risks Relating to Our Business and Structure — We may face increasing competition for investment opportunities, which could reduce returns and result in losses.”
 
Employees
 
We do not have any employees. Our day-to-day investment operations are managed by our investment adviser. See “Investment Advisory Agreement.” Our investment adviser employs a total of 18 investment professionals, including its principals. In addition, we reimburse our administrator, FSC, Inc., for the allocable portion of overhead and other expenses incurred by it in performing its obligations under an administration agreement, including the compensation of our chief financial officer and chief compliance officer, and their staff. FSC, Inc. has voluntarily determined to forgo receiving reimbursement for the services performed for us by our chief compliance officer, Bernard D. Berman, given his compensation arrangement with our investment adviser. However, although FSC, Inc. currently intends to forgo its right to receive such reimbursement, it is under no obligation to do so and may cease to


67


Table of Contents

do so at any time in the future. For a more detailed discussion of the administration agreement, see “Administration Agreement.”
 
Properties
 
We do not own any real estate or other physical properties materially important to our operation; however, we lease office space for our executive office at 10 Bank Street, 12th Floor, White Plains, NY 10606. Our investment adviser also maintains additional office space at 500 W. Putnam Ave., Suite 400, Greenwich, CT 06830. We believe that our current office facilities are adequate for our business as we intend to conduct it.
 
Legal Proceedings
 
Although we may, from time to time, be involved in litigation arising out of our operations in the normal course of business or otherwise, we are currently not a party to any pending material legal proceedings.


68


Table of Contents

 
PORTFOLIO COMPANIES
 
The following table sets forth certain information as of December 31, 2010, for each portfolio company in which we had a debt or equity investment. Other than these investments, our only formal relationships with our portfolio companies are the managerial assistance ancillary to our investments and the board observation or participation rights we may receive.
 
                                         
Name and Address of
      Titles of Securities
  Percentage of
      Cost of
  Fair Value of
Portfolio Company   Principal Business   Held by Us   Ownership   Loan Principal   Investment   Investment
 
Lighting by Gregory, LLC
                                       
158 Bowery
  Housewares &   First Lien Term Loan A, 9.75% due 2/28/2013           $ 4,055,655     $ 3,996,187     $ 4,055,655  
New York, NY 10012
  specialties   First Lien Term Loan B, 14.5% due 2/28/2013                          
        First Lien Bridge Loan, 8% due 10/15/2010             155,404       150,000        
        97.38% membership interest     97.4%               410,000        
                              4,556,187       4,055,655  
                                         
Nicos Polymers & Grinding Inc.
                                       
21 East 40th Street
  Environmental &   First Lien Term Loan, 8% due 12/4/2017             5,033,333       4,957,235       5,033,333  
New York, NY 10016
  facilities services   First Lien Revolver, 8% due 12/4/2017                            
        0.75% Interest in Crownbrook Acquisition I
LLC - Purchased
                    38,008        
        2.57% Interest in Crownbrook Acquisition I
LLC - Granted
    3.3%               130,078        
                              5,125,321       5,033,333  
                                         
O’Currance, Inc.
                                       
1785 South, 4130 West
  Data processing &   First Lien Term Loan A, 16.875% due 3/21/2012             11,073,880       10,997,715       10,879,458  
Salt Lake City, UT 84104
  outsourced services   First Lien Term Loan B, 16.875% due 3/21/2012             1,872,993       1,851,757       1,913,528  
        1.75% Preferred Membership Interest in O’Currance Holding Co., LLC                     130,413       3,587  
        3.3% Membership Interest in O’Currance
Holding Co., LLC
    5.1%               250,000        
                              13,229,885       12,796,573  
                                         
MK Network, LLC
                                       
200 Corporate Place
  Education services   First Lien Term Loan A, 13.5% due 6/1/2012             9,789,304       9,539,188       6,928,697  
Rocky Hill, CT 06067
      First Lien Term Loan B, 17.5% due 6/1/2012             4,950,941       4,748,004       3,448,666  
        First Lien Revolver, Prime + 1.5% (10% floor),
due 6/1/2010
                         
        11,030 Membership Units     2.4%               771,575        
                              15,058,767       10,377,363  
                                         
Caregiver Services, Inc.
                                       
10541 NW 117th Ave
Miami, FL 33122
  Healthcare services   Second Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+6.85%
(12% floor) due 2/25/2013
            6,783,839       6,492,617       6,768,521  
        Second Lien Term Loan B, 16.5% due 2/25/2013             14,808,616       14,275,137       14,353,376  
        1,080,399 shares of Series A Preferred Stock     3.3%               1,080,398       1,349,201  
                              21,848,152       22,471,098  
                                         
CPAC, Inc.
                                       
2364 Leicester Road
  Household products   Subordinated Term Loan, 12.5% due 6/1/2012             1,098,928       1,098,928       1,098,928  
Leicester, NY 14481
                            1,098,928       1,098,928  
                                         
Repechage Investments Limited
                                       
50 Congress Street, Suite 900
  Restaurants   First Lien Term Loan, 15.5% due 10/16/2011             3,584,394       3,388,830       3,417,458  
Boston, MA 02109
      7,500 shares of Series A Preferred Stock of
Elephant & Castle, Inc.
    4.3%               750,000       438,902  
                              4,138,830       3,856,360  
                                         
Traffic Control & Safety Corporation
                                       
815 Waiakamilo Rd #C
  Construction and   Senior Term Loan A, 7.741% due 06/29/2012             2,361,779       2,243,690       2,243,690  
Honolulu, HI 96817
  engineering   Senior Term Loan B, 5.29% due 06/29/2012             2,846,473       2,704,149       2,704,149  
        Senior Term Loan C, 5.29% due 06/29/2012             4,027,956       3,826,558       3,826,558  
        Senior Revolver, 5.29% due 06/29/2012             5,250,000       4,987,501       4,987,501  
        Second Lien Term Loan, 12% due 5/28/2015             20,174,355       19,942,451       19,742,401  
        Subordinated Loan, 15% due 5/28/2015             4,755,534       4,755,534       4,221,399  
        24,750 shares of Series B Preferred Stock     0.6%               247,500        
        43,494 shares of Series D Preferred Stock                     434,937        
        25,000 shares of Common Stock                     2,500        
                              39,144,820       37,725,698  
                                         
TBA Global, LLC
                                       
21700 Oxhard Street
  Advertising   53,994 Senior Preferred Shares                     215,975       215,975  
Woodland Hills, CA 91367
      191,977 Shares A Shares     2.0%               191,977       179,240  
                              407,952       395,215  
                                         
Fitness Edge, LLC
                                       
1100 Kings Highway
Fairfield, CT 06825
  Leisure facilities   First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+5.25%
(10% floor), due 8/8/2012
            1,125,000       1,121,180       1,125,818  
        First Lien Term Loan B, 15% due 8/8/2012             5,667,603       5,619,154       5,726,159  
        1,000 Common Units     1.0%               42,908       121,545  
                              6,783,242       6,973,522  
                                         
Filet of Chicken
                                       
146 Forest Parkway
  Food distributors   Second Lien Term Loan, 14.5% due 7/31/2012             9,327,820       9,108,209       9,023,399  
Forest Park, GA 30297
                            9,108,209       9,023,399  
                                         
Boot Barn
                                       
1520 S. Sinclair Street
  Apparel, accessories   247.06 shares of Series A Preferred Stock                     247,060       71,394  
Anaheim, CA 92806
  & luxury goods and
footwear
  1,308 shares of Common Stock     0.7%               131        
                              247,191       71,394  


69


Table of Contents

                                         
Name and Address of
      Titles of Securities
  Percentage of
      Cost of
  Fair Value of
Portfolio Company   Principal Business   Held by Us   Ownership   Loan Principal   Investment   Investment
 
Premier Trailer Leasing, Inc.
                                       
211 West Franklin Street
  Trucking   Second Lien Term Loan, 16.5% due 10/23/2012             18,606,639       17,063,645       4,597,412  
Grapevine, TX 76051
      285 shares of Common Stock     1.0%               1,140        
                              17,064,785       4,597,412  
                                         
Pacific Press Technologies, Inc.
                                       
714 Walnut Street
  Industrial machinery   Second Lien Term Loan, 14.75% due 7/10/2013             10,123,432       9,877,279       9,917,997  
Mount Carmel, IL 62863
      33,463 shares of Common Stock     3.4%               344,513       739,542  
                              10,221,792       10,657,539  
                                         
Rail Acquisition Corp.
                                       
1791 West Dairy
  Electronic   First Lien Term Loan, 17% due 9/1/2013             16,821,351       14,042,454       11,680,404  
Tucson, AZ 85705
  manufacturing svcs.   First Lien Revolver, 7.85% due 9/1/2013             4,959,135       4,959,135       4,959,135  
                              19,001,589       16,639,539  
                                         
Western Emulsions, Inc.
                                       
3450 East 36th Street
  Construction   Second Lien Term Loan, 15% due 6/30/2014             6,615,232       6,477,386       6,477,386  
Tucson, AZ 85713
  materials                         6,477,386       6,477,386  
                                         
Storyteller Theaters Corporation
                                       
2209 Miguel Chavez Road
  Movies &   1,692 shares of Common Stock                     169       61,613  
Santa Fe, NM 87505
  entertainment   20,000 shares of Preferred Stock     3.4%               200,000       200,000  
                              200,169       261,613  
HealthDrive Corporation
                                       
25 Needham Street
  Healthcare services   First Lien Term Loan A, 10% due 7/17/2013             6,562,970       6,255,358       6,485,832  
Newtown, MA 02461
      First Lien Term Loan B, 13% due 7/17/2013             10,204,760       10,104,760       10,082,408  
        First Lien Revolver, 12% due 7/17/2013             500,000       490,000       546,086  
                              16,850,118       17,114,326  
                                         
idX Corporation
                                       
3541 Rier Trail South
  Distributors   Second Lien Term Loan, 14.5% due 7/1/2014             13,658,366       13,436,082       13,415,216  
St. Louis, MO 63045
                            13,436,082       13,415,216  
                                         
Cenegenics, LLC
                                       
851 South Rampart Boulevard
  Healthcare services   First Lien Term Loan, 17% due 10/27/2014             20,051,045       19,186,297       19,569,475  
Las Vegas, NV 89145
      414,419 Common Units     3.5%               598,382       1,319,149  
                              19,784,679       20,888,624  
                                         
IZI Medical Products, Inc.
                                       
7020 Tudsbury Road
  Healthcare   First Lien Term Loan A, 12% due 3/31/2014             4,249,775       4,196,179       4,232,773  
Baltimore, MD 21244
  technology   First Lien Term Loan B, 16% due 3/31/2014             17,259,468       16,743,527       17,113,683  
        First Lien Revolver, 10% due 3/31/2014                   (32,500 )      
        453,755 Preferred units of IZI Holdings, LLC     2.0%               453,755       647,069  
                              21,360,961       21,993,525  
                                         
Trans-Trade, Inc.
                                       
1040 Trade Ave
  Air freight &   First Lien Term Loan, 15.5% due 9/10/2014             16,006,996       15,710,301       15,878,390  
Suite 106 DFW
  logistics   First Lien Revolver, 12% due 9/10/2014             2,000,000       1,890,667       1,956,755  
Airport, TX 75261
                            17,600,968       17,835,145  
                                         
Riverlake Equity Partners II, LP
                                       
One Exeter Plaza
  Multi-sector holdings   1.87% limited partnership interest     1.9%               122,105       122,105  
699 Boylston Street, 8th Floor
                            122,105       122,105  
Boston, MA 02116
                                       
                                         
Riverside Fund IV, LP
                                       
One Exeter Plaza
  Multi-sector holdings   0.33% limited partnership interest     0.3%               321,417       321,417  
699 Boylston Street, 8th Floor
                            321,417       321,417  
Boston, MA 02116
                                       
                                         
ADAPCO, Inc.
                                       
550 Aero Lane
  Fertilizers &   First Lien Term Loan A, 10% due 12/17/2014             8,500,000       8,311,428       8,365,910  
Sanford, FL 32771
  agricultural   First Lien Term Loan B, 14% due 12/17/2014             14,298,448       13,985,575       14,002,842  
    chemicals   First Lien Term Revolver, 10% due 12/17/2014             4,250,000       4,026,520       4,170,584  
                              26,323,523       26,539,336  
                                         
AmBath/ReBath Holdings, Inc.
                                       
421 West Alameda Dr.
  Home improvement   First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+7% (10% floor) due 12/30/2014             9,250,000       9,048,648       8,951,281  
Tempe, AZ 85282
  retail   First Lien Term Loan B, 15% due 12/30/2014             22,567,297       22,101,997       21,922,954  
        First Lien Term Revolver, LIBOR+6.5% (9.5% floor) due 12/30/2014             1,500,000       1,436,550       1,444,374  
                              32,587,195       32,318,609  
                                         
JTC Education, Inc.
                                       
6602 E. 75th Street, Suite 200
  Education services   First Lien Term Loan, LIBOR+9.5% (12.5% floor) due 12/31/2014             30,859,375       30,093,388       30,457,010  
Indianapolis, IN 46250
      First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+9.5% (12.5% floor) due 12/31/2014                   (377,222 )      
                              29,716,166       30,457,010  
                                         
Tegra Medical, LLC
                                       
421 West Alameda Dr.
  Healthcare   First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+7% (10% floor) due 12/31/2014             25,480,000       25,075,398       25,525,452  
Tempe, AZ 85282
  equipment   First Lien Term Loan B, 14% due 12/31/2014             22,212,109       21,864,318       22,164,301  
        First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+7% (10% floor) due 12/31/2014                   (62,667 )      
                              46,877,049       47,689,753  
                                         
Flatout, Inc.
                                       
1422 Woodland Dr. 
  Food retail   First Lien Term Loan A, 10% due 12/31/2014             7,050,000       6,888,024       6,927,166  
Saline, MI 48176
      First Lien Term Loan B, 15% due 12/31/2014             12,863,830       12,560,321       12,686,564  
        First Lien Revolver, 10% due 12/31/2014                   (35,847 )      
                              19,412,498       19,613,730  
                                         
Psilos Group Partners IV, LP
                                       
140 Broadway, 51st Floor
  Multi-sector holdings   2.53% limited partnership interest     2.5%                      
New York, NY 10005
                                   

70


Table of Contents

                                         
Name and Address of
      Titles of Securities
  Percentage of
      Cost of
  Fair Value of
Portfolio Company   Principal Business   Held by Us   Ownership   Loan Principal   Investment   Investment
 
Mansell Group, Inc.
                                       
2 Securities Center,
  Advertising   First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+7% (10% floor) due 4/30/2015             9,937,500       9,755,254       9,753,678  
3500 Piedmont Rd Ste 320
      First Lien Term Loan B, LIBOR+9% (13.5% floor) due 4/30/2015             8,046,018       7,898,194       7,995,656  
Atlanta, GA 30305
      First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+6% (9% floor) due 4/30/2015                     (34,667 )      
                              17,618,781       17,749,334  
                                         
NDSSI Holdings, Inc.
                                       
5750 Hellyer Ave
  Electronic equipment   First Lien Term, LIBOR+9.75% (13.75% floor) due 9/10/2014             30,132,293       29,603,069       29,284,795  
San Jose, CA 95138
  & instruments   First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+7% (10% floor) due 9/10/2014             3,500,000       3,415,385       3,397,632  
                              33,018,454       32,682,427  
                                         
Eagle Hospital Physicians, Inc.
                                       
5901 C Peachtree
  Health care services   First Lien Term, LIBOR+8.75% (11.75% floor) due 8/11/2015             8,000,000       7,801,966       7,808,773  
Dunwoody Rd., Ste 350
Atlanta, GA 30328
      First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+5.75% (8.75% floor) due 8/11/2015                     (60,076 )      
                              7,741,890       7,808,773  
                                         
Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC
                                       
8014 Bayberry Road
  Diversified support   First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+7% (9% floor) due 8/13/2015             15,250,000       14,950,346       14,892,359  
Jacksonville, FL 32256
  services   First Lien Term Loan B, LIBOR+10% (13% floor) due 8/13/2015             11,043,150       10,827,388       10,928,166  
        First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+7% (9% floor) due 8/13/2015                   (78,459 )      
                              25,699,275       25,820,525  
                                         
Epic Acquisition, Inc.
                                       
1349 Empire Central,
  Healthcare services   First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+8% (11% floor) due 8/13/2015             9,685,000       9,459,263       9,423,141  
Ste 515 Dallas, TX 75247
      First Lien Term Loan B, 15.25% due 8/13/2015             17,031,895       16,624,539       16,680,678  
        First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+6.5% (9.5% floor) due 8/13/2015             800,000       728,544       779,105  
                              26,812,346       26,882,924  
                                         
Specialty Bakers LLC
                                       
450 South State Street
  Food distributors   First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+8.5% due 9/15/2015             9,000,000       8,769,920       8,799,561  
Marysville, LA 17053
      First Lien Term Loan B, LIBOR + 11% (13.5% floor) due 9/15/2015             11,000,000       10,723,533       10,706,353  
        First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+8.5% due 9/15/2015                   (100,533 )      
                              19,392,920       19,505,914  
                                         
CRGT, Inc. 
                                       
8150 Leesburg Pike,
  IT consulting &   First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+7.5% due 10/1/2015             29,000,000       28,460,094       29,000,000  
Suite 405
  other services   First Lien Term Loan B, 12.5% due 10/1/2015             22,000,000       21,582,000       22,000,000  
Vienna, VA 22182
      First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+7.5% due 10/1/2015                   (237,500 )      
                              49,804,594       51,000,000  
                                         
Welocalize, Inc. 
                                       
241 East 4th St. Suite 207
  Internet software   First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+8% (10% floor) due 11/19/2015             16,400,000       16,079,508       16,400,000  
Frederick, MD 21701
  & services   First Lien Term Loan B, LIBOR+9% (12.25% due 11/19/2015             21,030,634       20,624,634       21,030,634  
        First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+7% (9% floor) due 11/19/2015             1,250,000       1,134,000       1,250,000  
        Common equity interest - purchased     4.0%             2,086,163       2,086,163  
                              39,924,305       40,766,797  
                                         
Miche Bag, LLC
                                       
10808 S. River Front
  Apparel, accessories   First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+9% (12% floor) due 12/7/2013             15,500,000       15,118,187       15,500,000  
Pkwy, Suite 150
  & luxury goods   First Lien Term Loan B, LIBOR + 10% (16% floor) due 12/7/2015             17,034,000       14,152,177       14,534,000  
South Jordan, UT 84095
      First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+7% (10% floor) due 12/7/2015                   (124,555 )      
        10,371 shares of preferred equity interest - granted                   1,037,112       1,037,112  
        146,289 shares of series D common equity interest - granted     3.4%             1,462,888       1,462,888  
                              31,645,809       32,534,000  
                                         
Bunker Hill Capital II (QP), L.P. 
                                       
260 Franklin Street, Suite 1860
  Multi-sector holdings   Limited partnership interest     0.5%                      
Boston, MA 02110
                                   
                                         
Dominion Diagnostics, LLC
                                       
211 Circuit Drive
  Healthcare services   First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+7% (9% floor) due 12/17/2015             30,750,000       30,140,651       30,750,000  
North Kingston, RI 02852
      First Lien Term Loan B, LIBOR+9% (12.5% floor) due 12/17/2015             20,008,333       19,615,000       20,008,333  
        First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+6.5% (9% floor) due 12/17/2015                   (98,083 )      
                              49,657,568       50,758,333  
                                         
Advanced Pain Management
                                       
4131 W. Loomis Road, Suite 300
  Healthcare services   First Lien Term Loan, LIBOR+5% (6.75% floor) due 12/22/2015             8,200,000       8,056,673       8,200,000  
Greenfield, WI 53221
      First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+5% (6.75% floor) due 12/22/2015                   (5,900 )      
                              8,050,773       8,200,000  
                                         
DISA, Inc. 
                                       
12600 Northborough
Drive, Suite 300
  Human resources &
employment services
  First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+7.5% (8.25% floor) due 12/30/2015             13,000,000       12,727,732       13,000,000  
Houston, TX 77067
      First Lien Term Loan B, LIBOR+11.5% (12.5% floor) due 12/30/2015             8,300,346       8,128,965       8,300,346  
        First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+6% (7% floor) due 12/30/2015                   (82,593 )      
                              20,774,104       21,300,346  
                                         
Best Vinyl Fence & Deck, LLC
                                       
62 North 1020 West
  Building products   First Lien Term Loan A, 8% due 11/30/2013             2,020,043       1,916,192       2,020,043  
American Fork, UT 84003
      First Lien Term Loan B, 8% due 5/31/2011             3,787,580       3,787,580       3,787,580  
        First Lien Revolver, 8% due 11/30/2011                          
        25,641 Shares of Series A Preferred Stock- Granted     1.5%             253,846        
        25,641 Shares of Common Stock - Granted                   2,564        
                              5,960,182       5,807,623  
                                         
Saddleback Fence and Vinyl Products, Inc. 
                                       
2844 Croddy Way
  Building products   First Lien Term Loan, 8% due 11/30/2013             757,516       757,516       757,516  
Santa Ana, CA 92704
      First Lien Revolver, 8% due 11/30/2011                          
                              757,516       757,516  
                                         
Total Investments
                          $ 754,964,483     $ 742,395,335  

71


Table of Contents

Description of Portfolio Companies
 
Set forth below is a brief description of each of our portfolio companies as of December 31, 2010.
 
  •  ADAPCO, Inc. is a distributor of pesticides and herbicides and related equipment for commercial and industrial use.
 
  •  Advanced Pain Management is a provider of interventional pain management.
 
  •  Ambath/Rebath Holdings, Inc. is a holding company that holds two subsidiaries that franchise and provide bathroom remodeling services.
 
  •  Best Vinyl Fence & Deck, LLC is a vinyl fence installer and distributor in the Western United States.
 
  •  Boot Barn is a western-themed specialty retailer.
 
  •  Bunker Hill Capital II (QP), L.P. is a private equity firm that invests in lower middle market companies.
 
  •  Caregiver Services, Inc. is a nurse registry in Florida that provides in home assisted living services.
 
  •  Cenegenics, LLC is an age management medicine organization that evaluates and provides therapy with a focus on optimal health, wellness, and prevention.
 
  •  CPAC, Inc. manufactures and markets specialty chemicals and related accessories for household and commercial cleaning, personal care, and photo-processing applications.
 
  •  CRGT, Inc. is a provider of technology solutions.
 
  •  Dominion Diagnostics, LLC is a provider of clinical quantitative urine drug monitoring.
 
  •  DISA, Inc. is a provider of employee screening services, including drug and alcohol testing, background screening, safety training and occupational medical testing.
 
  •  Eagle Hospital Physicians, Inc. provides hospitalist contract services, telemedicine, and hospitalist temporary staffing to hospitals in the Southeast and Mid-Atlantic regions.
 
  •  Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC is an Accounts Receivable Management/Collection Agency that has emerged as a leader in the ARM Industry.
 
  •  Epic Acquisition, Inc. is a provider of home healthcare to medically fragile infants and children in the state of Texas.
 
  •  Filet of Chicken (formerly known as FOC Acquisition LLC) is a processor of frozen chicken products.
 
  •  Fitness Edge, LLC operates fitness clubs in Fairfield County, Connecticut.
 
  •  Flatout, Inc. manufactures and markets healthy, premium flatbreads, wraps, and snack crisps.
 
  •  HealthDrive Corporation is a provider of multi-specialty, on-site healthcare services to residents of its extended care facilities.
 
  •  idX Corporation is a global provider of merchandise display solutions.
 
  •  IZI Medical Products, Inc. is a provider of medical markers used in procedures in Radiology, Radiation Therapy, Orthopedics, Ear, Nose, and Throat, and Image Guided Surgeries.
 
  •  JTC Education, Inc. is a platform of postsecondary for-profit schools focused on nursing and allied health.
 
  •  Lighting by Gregory, LLC is a retailer that sells brand-name luxury lighting products through a website and a traditional brick-and-mortar showroom.
 
  •  MK Network, LLC is a medical communications and continuing medical education company. MK Network’s medical communication services assist pharmaceutical and biotechnology brand teams with educating healthcare professionals on the features, benefits and appropriate prescribing of drugs.


72


Table of Contents

 
  •  Mansell Group, Inc. combines leading technology and marketing insight to drive customer communication programs including: email communications, SMS mobile marketing, broadcast voice messaging and database management.
 
  •  Miche Bag, LLC designs and manufactures branded handbags and accessories.
 
  •  NDSSI Holdings, Inc. is a manufacturer of flat-panel Liquid Crystal Display screens for medical applications.
 
  •  Nicos Polymers & Grinding, Inc. provides post-industrial plastic size reduction and reclamation services.
 
  •  O’Currance, Inc. provides telemarketing, telesales, and call center operations for clients in a wide range of industries. It deploys a unique mix of home-based and brick and mortar center-based sales representatives to handle inbound consumer calls from marketing promotions.
 
  •  Pacific Press Technologies, Inc. is a leading manufacturer of a wide range of highly engineered, specialized plastic and metal forming equipment, as well as complementary tooling, parts, refurbishment and repair and maintenance services.
 
  •  Premier Trailer and Leasing, Inc. provides long-term and short-term leases on truck trailers for periods ranging from a single month to several years.
 
  •  Psilos Group Partners IV, LP is a private fund that makes venture capital investments in the healthcare sector.
 
  •  Rail Acquisition Corp. is a designer, manufacturer, and distributor of linear slides and precision mechanical and electro-mechanical products for original equipment manufacturers in the computer hardware, telecommunications, and industrial equipment markets.
 
  •  Repechage Investments Limited is an investment company that holds investments in the restaurant, transportation, service and real estate sectors.
 
  •  Riverlake Equity Partners II, LP is a private fund that invests in growing middle market healthcare and technology oriented companies.
 
  •  Riverside Fund IV, LP is a private fund that invests in growing middle market healthcare and technology oriented companies.
 
  •  Saddleback Fence and Vinyl Products, Inc. is a vinyl fence installer and distributor in the Western United States.
 
  •  Specialty Bakers LLC is the primary producer of ladyfingers in the United States as well as a leading provider of other high-quality branded, in-store bakery, and private label baked products.
 
  •  Storytellers Theaters Corporation is an operator of theaters in New Mexico, Colorado, Arizona, and Wyoming.
 
  •  TBA Global, LLC engages in designing, producing, and executing corporate events and consumer marketing programs.
 
  •  Tegra Medical, LLC is a full service medical device contract manufacturer, providing a one-stop shop with expertise in metal grinding, precision laser welding and cutting, and wire EDM capabilities.
 
  •  Traffic Control and Safety Corporation sells, rents, and services traffic control equipment and personal safety supplies. It also provides safety training seminars and designs and implements traffic control plans.
 
  •  Trans-Trade, Inc. is a non-asset based logistics company that provides custom house brokerage, international freight forwarding, domestic transportation, warehousing & distribution, reverse logistics and other supply chain services to a variety of customers.
 
  •  Welocalize, Inc. is a provider of technology-based services.
 
  •  Western Emulsions, Inc. is a supplier of specialty patented and standard asphalt emulsions and raw asphalt used for roadway pavement preservation, repair, and restoration projects with operations in Tucson, AZ and Irwindale, CA.


73


Table of Contents

 
MANAGEMENT
 
Our business and affairs are managed under the direction of our Board of Directors. Our Board of Directors appoints our officers, who serve at the discretion of the Board of Directors. The responsibilities of the Board of Directors include, among other things, the oversight of our investment activities, the quarterly valuation of our assets, oversight of our financing arrangements and corporate governance activities. The Board of Directors has an Audit Committee, a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, a Valuation Committee and a Compensation Committee, and may establish additional committees from time to time as necessary.
 
Board of Directors and Executive Officers
 
Our Board of Directors consists of seven members, five of whom are classified under applicable New York Stock Exchange listing standards by our Board of Directors as “independent” directors and under Section 2(a)(19) of the 1940 Act as non-interested persons. Pursuant to our restated certificate of incorporation, our Board of Directors is divided into three classes. Each class of directors will hold office for a three-year term. However, the initial members of the three classes had initial terms of one, two and three years, respectively. At each annual meeting of our stockholders, the successors to the class of directors whose terms expire at such meeting will be elected to hold office for a term expiring at the annual meeting of stockholders held in the third year following the year of their election. Each director will hold office for the term to which he or she is elected and until his or her successor is duly elected and qualifies. Our restated certificate of incorporation also gives our Board of Directors sole authority to appoint directors to fill vacancies that are created either through an increase in the number of directors or due to the resignation, removal or death of any director.
 
Directors
 
Information regarding our Board of Directors is set forth below. We have divided the directors into two groups — independent directors and interested directors. Interested directors are “interested persons” of Fifth Street Finance Corp. as defined in Section 2(a)(19) of the 1940 Act.
 
The address for each director is c/o Fifth Street Finance Corp., 10 Bank Street, 12th Floor, White Plains, NY 10606.
 
                         
        Director
  Expiration of
Name
  Age   Since   Term
 
Independent Directors
                       
Brian S. Dunn
    39       2007       2011  
Richard P. Dutkiewicz
    55       2010       2013  
Byron J. Haney
    50       2007       2011  
Frank C. Meyer
    67       2007       2013  
Douglas F. Ray
    43       2007       2013  
Interested Directors
                       
Leonard M. Tannenbaum
    39       2007       2012  
Bernard D. Berman
    40       2009       2012  
 
Executive Officers
 
The following persons serve as our executive officers in the following capacities:
 
             
Name
  Age  
Position(s) Held
 
Leonard M. Tannenbaum
    39     Chief Executive Officer
Bernard D. Berman
    40     President, Chief Compliance Officer and Secretary
William H. Craig
    55     Chief Financial Officer
Ivelin M. Dimitrov
    32     Co-Chief Investment Officer
Chad S. Blakeman
    47     Co-Chief Investment Officer


74


Table of Contents

The address for each executive officer is c/o Fifth Street Finance Corp., 10 Bank Street, 12th Floor, White Plains, NY 10606.
 
Biographical Information
 
Independent Directors
 
  •  Brian S. Dunn.  Mr. Dunn has been a member of our Board of Directors since December 2007. Mr. Dunn has over 16 years of marketing, logistical and entrepreneurial experience. He founded and turned around direct marketing divisions for several consumer-oriented companies. Since June 2006, Mr. Dunn has been the marketing director for Lipenwald, Inc., a direct marketing company that markets collectibles and mass merchandise. Prior to that, from February 2001 to June 2006, he was sole proprietor of BSD Trading/Consulting. Mr. Dunn graduated from the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania in 1993 with a B.S. in Economics.
 
Mr. Dunn’s executive experience brings extensive business, entrepreneurial and marketing expertise to his Board service with the company. His experience as a marketing executive for several consumer-oriented companies provides guidance to our investor relations efforts. Mr. Dunn’s many experiences also make him skilled in leading committees requiring substantive expertise, including his role as chairman of the Board’s Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Mr. Dunn’s previous service on the Board also provides him with a specific understanding of our company, its operations, and the business and regulatory issues facing business development companies.
 
  •  Richard P. Dutkiewicz.  Mr. Dutkiewicz has been a member of our Board of Directors since February 2010. Since April 2010, Mr. Dutkiewicz has been the executive vice president and chief financial officer of Real Mex Restaurants, Inc. Mr. Dutkiewicz previously served as chief financial officer of Einstein Noah Restaurant Group from October 2003 to March 2010. From May 2003 to October 2003, Mr. Dutkiewicz was vice president -information technology of Sirenza Microdevices, Inc. In May 2003, Sirenza Microdevices, Inc. acquired Vari-L Company, Inc. From January 2001 to May 2003, Mr. Dutkiewicz was vice president-finance, and chief financial officer of Vari-L Company, Inc. From April 1995 to January 2001, Mr. Dutkiewicz was vice president-finance, chief financial officer, secretary and treasurer of Coleman Natural Products, Inc., located in Denver, Colorado. Mr. Dutkiewicz’s previous experience includes senior financial management positions at Tetrad Corporation, MicroLithics Corporation and various divisions of United Technologies Corporation. Mr. Dutkiewicz began his career as an Audit Manager at KPMG LLP. Mr. Dutkiewicz received a B.B.A. degree from Loyola University of Chicago. Mr. Dutkiewicz currently serves on the Board of Directors of Motor Sport Country Club, a Motorsports destination resort in Denver, Colorado.
 
Through his prior experiences as a vice president and chief financial officer at several public companies, including executive vice president and chief financial officer of Real Mex Restaurants, Inc. and chief financial officer of Einstein Noah Restaurant Group, Mr. Dutkiewicz brings business expertise, finance and audit skills to his Board service with our company. Mr. Dutkiewicz’s expertise, experience and skills closely align with our operations, and his prior investment experience with managing public companies facilitates an in-depth understanding of our investment business.
 
  •  Byron J. Haney.  Mr. Haney has been a member of our Board of Directors since December 2007. Mr. Haney is currently a principal of Duggan Asset Management, L.L.C. where he serves as director of research. From 1994 until 2009, Mr. Haney worked for Resurgence Asset Management LLC, during which time he most recently served as managing director and chief investment officer. Mr. Haney previously served on the Board of Directors of Sterling Chemicals, Inc., and Furniture.com. Mr. Haney has more than 25 years of business experience, including having served as chief financial officer of a private retail store chain and as an auditor with Touche Ross & Co., a predecessor of Deloitte & Touche LLP. Mr. Haney earned his B.S. in Business Administration from the University of California at Berkeley and his M.B.A. from the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania.
 
Through his extensive experiences as a senior executive, Mr. Haney brings business expertise, finance and risk assessment skills to his Board service with our company. In addition, Mr. Haney’s past experience as an


75


Table of Contents

auditor greatly benefits our oversight of our quarterly and annual financial reporting obligations. Moreover, Mr. Haney’s knowledge of financial and accounting matters qualify him as the Board’s Audit Committee Financial Expert. Mr. Haney’s previous service on the Board also provides him with a specific understanding of our company, its operations, and the business and regulatory issues facing business development companies.
 
  •  Frank C. Meyer.  Mr. Meyer has been a member of our Board of Directors since December 2007. Mr. Meyer is a private investor who was chairman of Glenwood Capital Investments, LLC, an investment adviser specializing in hedge funds, which he founded in January of 1988 and from which he resigned in January of 2004. As of October of 2000, Glenwood has been a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Man Group, PLC, an investment adviser based in England specializing in alternative investment strategies. Since leaving Glenwood in 2004, Mr. Meyer has focused on serving as a director for various companies. During his career, Mr. Meyer has served as an outside director on a several companies, including Quality Systems, Inc. (a public company specializing in software for medical and dental professionals), Bernard Technologies, Inc. (a firm specializing in development of industrial processes using chlorine dioxide), and Centurion Trust Company of Arizona (where he served as a non-executive chairman until its purchase by GE Financial). Currently, he is on the Board of Directors of Einstein-Noah Restaurant Group, Inc., a firm operating in the quick casual segment of the restaurant industry, and United Capital Financial Partners, Inc., a firm that converts transaction-oriented brokers into fee-based financial planners. He is also on the Board of Directors of three investment funds run by Ferox Capital Management, Limited, an investment manager based in the United Kingdom that specializes in convertible bonds. Mr. Meyer received his B.A. and M.B.A. from the University of Chicago.
 
Mr. Meyer’s extensive investment experiences within the financial advisory industry provides our company with broad and diverse knowledge concerning general business trends and the capital markets. Mr. Meyer’s experience and skills closely align with our business, and his lending and credit experience facilitates an in-depth understanding of risk associated with the structuring of investments. Mr. Meyer’s board related experiences makes him skilled in leading committees requiring substantive expertise. In addition, Mr. Meyer’s risk management expertise and credit related experience also qualify him to serve as chairman of our Valuation Committee. Mr. Meyer’s previous service on the Board also provides him with a specific understanding of our company, its operations, and the business and regulatory issues facing business development companies.
 
  •  Douglas F. Ray.  Mr. Ray has been a member of our Board of Directors since December 2007. Since August 1995, Mr. Ray has worked for Seavest Inc., a private investment and wealth management firm based in White Plains, New York. He currently serves as the president of Seavest Inc. Mr. Ray has more than 15 years experience acquiring, developing, financing and managing a diverse portfolio of real estate investments, including three healthcare properties funds. Mr. Ray previously served on the Board of Directors of Nat Nast, Inc., a luxury men’s apparel company. Prior to joining Seavest, Mr. Ray worked in Washington, D.C. on the staff of U.S. Senator Arlen Specter and as a research analyst with the Republican National Committee. Mr. Ray holds a B.A. from the University of Pittsburgh.
 
Through his broad experience as an officer and director of several companies, in addition to skills acquired with firms engaged in investment banking, banking and financial services, Mr. Ray brings to our company extensive financial and risk assessment abilities. Mr. Ray’s previous service on the Board also provides him with a specific understanding of our company, its operations, and the business and regulatory issues facing business development companies. Mr. Ray’s expertise and experience also qualify him to serve as chairman of the Compensation Committee.
 
Interested Directors
 
  •  Leonard M. Tannenbaum, CFA.  Mr. Tannenbaum has been our chief executive officer since October 2007 and the chairman of our Board of Directors since December 2007, and was our president from October 2007 through February 2010. He is also the managing partner of our investment adviser and serves on its investment committee. Since founding his first private investment firm in 1998, Mr. Tannenbaum has


76


Table of Contents

  founded a number of private investment firms, including Fifth Street Capital LLC, and he has served as managing member of each firm. Prior to launching his first firm, Mr. Tannenbaum gained extensive small-company experience as an equity analyst for Merrill Lynch. In addition to serving on our Board of Directors, Mr. Tannenbaum currently serves on the Board of Directors of several private Greenlight Capital affiliated entities and has previously served on the Boards of Directors of several other public companies, including Einstein Noah Restaurant Group, Inc., Assisted Living Concepts, Inc. and WesTower Communications, Inc. Mr. Tannenbaum has also served on four audit committees and five compensation committees, of which he has acted as chairperson for one of such audit committees and four of such compensation committees. Mr. Tannenbaum graduated from the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania, where he received a B.S. in Economics. Subsequent to his undergraduate degree from the University of Pennsylvania, Mr. Tannenbaum received an M.B.A. in Finance from the Wharton School as part of the Submatriculation Program. He is a holder of the Chartered Financial Analyst designation and he is also a member of the Young Presidents’ Organization.
 
Through his broad experience as an officer and director of several private and public companies, in addition to skills acquired with firms engaged in investment banking and financial services, Mr. Tannenbaum brings to our company a unique business expertise and knowledge of private equity financing as well as extensive financial and risk assessment abilities. Mr. Tannenbaum’s previous service on the Board also provides him with a specific understanding of our company, its operations, and the business and regulatory issues facing business development companies. Mr. Tannenbaum’s positions as chief executive officer of our company, managing partner of our investment adviser and member of its investment committee provides the Board with a direct line of communication to, and direct knowledge of the operations of, our company and its investment advisor, respectively.
 
  •  Bernard D. Berman.  Mr. Berman has been a member of our Board of Directors since February 2009. He has also been our president since February 2010, our chief compliance officer since April 2009 and our secretary since October 2007. Mr. Berman is also a partner of our investment adviser and serves on its investment committee. Mr. Berman is responsible for the operations of our company. Prior to joining Fifth Street in 2004, Mr. Berman was a corporate attorney from 1995 to 2004, during which time he negotiated and structured a variety of investment transactions. Mr. Berman graduated from Boston College Law School. He received a B.S. in Finance from Lehigh University.
 
Mr. Berman’s prior position as a corporate attorney allows him to bring to the Board and our company the benefit of his experience negotiating and structuring various investment transactions as well as an understanding of the legal, business, compliance and regulatory issues facing business development companies. Mr. Berman’s previous service on the Board also provides him with a specific understanding of our company and its operations.
 
Non-Director Executive Officers
 
  •  William H. Craig.  Mr. Craig has been our chief financial officer since October 2007 and was our chief compliance officer from December 2007 through April 2009. Prior to joining Fifth Street, from March 2005 to October 2007, Mr. Craig was an executive vice president and chief financial officer of Vital-Signs, Inc., a medical device manufacturer that was later acquired by General Electric Company’s GE Healthcare unit in October 2008. Prior to that, from January 2004 to March 2005, he worked as an interim chief financial officer and Sarbanes-Oxley consultant. From 1999 to 2004, Mr. Craig served as an executive vice president for finance and administration and chief financial officer for Matheson Trigas, Inc., a manufacturer and marketer of industrial gases and related equipment. Mr. Craig’s prior experience includes stints at GE Capital, Deloitte & Touche LLP, and GMAC, as well as merchant banking. Mr. Craig has an M.B.A. from Texas A&M University and a B.A. from Wake Forest University. Mr. Craig is a Certified Public Accountant and is accredited in Business Valuation and certified in Financial Forensics.
 
  •  Ivelin M. Dimitrov, CFA.   Mr.  Dimitrov has been our co-chief investment officer since November 2010 and the co-chief investment officer of our investment adviser since June 2010. He is also a partner of our investment adviser and serves on its investment committee. Mr. Dimitrov has over six years of experience


77


Table of Contents

  structuring small and mid-cap transactions. Mr. Dimitrov joined our investment adviser in May 2005 and is responsible for the evaluation of new investment opportunities, deal structuring and portfolio monitoring, in addition to managing the investment adviser’s associate and analyst team. In addition, Mr. Dimitrov is the chairman of the investment adviser’s internal valuation committee. He has substantial experience in financial analysis, valuation and investment research. Mr. Dimitrov graduated from the Carroll Graduate School of Management at Boston College with an M.S. in Finance and has a B.S. in Business Administration from the University of Maine. He is also a holder of the Chartered Financial Analyst designation.
 
  •  Chad S. Blakeman.  Mr. Blakeman has been our co-chief investment officer since November 2010, a managing director of our investment adviser since April 2010 and co-chief investment officer of our investment adviser since June 2010. He also serves on our investment adviser’s investment committee. Mr. Blakeman has more than 24 years of lending-related experience in underwriting and account management in the cash flow and asset-based markets. Mr. Blakeman is primarily responsible for overseeing all underwriting and risk management processes at our investment adviser. Prior to joining, Mr. Blakeman was a managing partner at CastleGuard Partners LLC, a middle market finance company, from March 2009 to March 2010. Prior to that, Mr. Blakeman was managing director and senior risk officer for Freeport Financial LLC from October 2004 to March 2009, where he co-managed a portfolio of approximately $1.5 billion. Prior to Freeport Financial, Mr. Blakeman worked at GE Capital Corporation’s global sponsor finance group, First Chicago Bank, Bank of America and Heller Financial Inc. Mr. Blakeman received his B.S. in Finance from the University of Illinois and his M.B.A. from DePaul University.
 
Board Leadership Structure
 
Our Board of Directors monitors and performs an oversight role with respect to our business and affairs, including with respect to investment practices and performance, compliance with regulatory requirements and the services, expenses and performance of service providers to us. Among other things, our Board of Directors approves the appointment of our investment adviser and our officers, reviews and monitors the services and activities performed by our investment adviser and our executive officers and approves the engagement, and reviews the performance of, our independent registered public accounting firm.
 
Under our Amended and Restated By-laws, our Board of Directors may designate a chairman to preside over the meetings of the Board of Directors and meetings of the stockholders and to perform such other duties as may be assigned to him by the Board of Directors. We do not have a fixed policy as to whether the chairman of the Board of Directors should be an independent director and believe that we should maintain the flexibility to select the chairman and reorganize the leadership structure, from time to time, based on the criteria that is in our best interests and the best interests of our stockholders at such times. Our Board of Directors has established corporate governance procedures to guard against, among other things, an improperly constituted Board. Pursuant to our Corporate Governance Policy, whenever the chairman of the Board is not an independent director, the chairman of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will act as the presiding independent director at meetings of the “Non-Management Directors” (which will include the independent directors and other directors who are not officers of the company even though they may have another relationship to the company or its management that prevents them from being independent directors).
 
Presently, Mr. Tannenbaum serves as the chairman of our Board of Directors and he is also our chief executive officer. We believe that Mr. Tannenbaum’s history with our company, familiarity with its investment platform, and extensive knowledge of the financial services industry qualify him to serve as the chairman of our Board of Directors. We believe that we are best served through this existing leadership structure, as Mr. Tannenbaum’s relationship with our investment adviser provides an effective bridge and encourages an open dialogue between management and our Board of Directors, ensuring that these groups act with a common purpose.
 
Our Board of Directors does not currently have a designated lead independent director. We are aware of the potential conflicts that may arise when a non-independent director is chairman of the Board of Directors, but believe these potential conflicts are offset by our strong corporate governance practices. Our corporate governance practices includes regular meetings of the independent directors in executive session without the presence of interested directors and management, the establishment of Audit and Nominating and Corporate Governance


78


Table of Contents

Committees comprised solely of independent directors and the appointment of a chief compliance officer, with whom the independent directors meet without the presence of interested directors and other members of management, for administering our compliance policies and procedures. While certain non-management members of our Board of Directors currently participate on the boards of directors of other public companies, we do not view their participation as excessive or as interfering with their duties on our Board of Directors.
 
Board’s Role In Risk Oversight
 
Our Board of Directors performs its risk oversight function primarily through (i) its four standing committees, which report to the entire Board of Directors and are comprised solely of independent directors, and (ii) active monitoring of our chief compliance officer and our compliance policies and procedures.
 
As described below in more detail, the Audit Committee, the Valuation Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee assist the Board of Directors in fulfilling its risk oversight responsibilities. The Audit Committee’s risk oversight responsibilities include overseeing the company’s accounting and financial reporting processes, the company’s systems of internal controls regarding finance and accounting, and audits of the company’s financial statements. The Valuation Committee’s risk oversight responsibilities include establishing guidelines and making recommendations to our Board of Directors regarding the valuation of our loans and investments. The Compensation Committee’s risk oversight responsibilities include reviewing and approving the reimbursement by the company of the compensation of the company’s chief financial officer and his staff, and the staff of the company’s chief compliance officer. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s risk oversight responsibilities include selecting, researching and nominating directors for election by our stockholders, developing and recommending to the Board of Directors a set of corporate governance principles and overseeing the evaluation of the Board of Directors and our management.
 
Our Board of Directors also performs its risk oversight responsibilities with the assistance of the company’s chief compliance officer. The Board of Directors annually reviews a written report from the chief compliance officer discussing the adequacy and effectiveness of the compliance policies and procedures of the company and its service providers. The chief compliance officer’s annual report addresses at a minimum (i) the operation of the compliance policies and procedures of the company since the last report; (ii) any material changes to such policies and procedures since the last report; (iii) any recommendations for material changes to such policies and procedures as a result of the chief compliance officer’s annual review; and (iv) any compliance matter that has occurred since the date of the last report about which the Board of Directors would reasonably need to know to oversee our compliance activities and risks. In addition, the chief compliance officer meets separately in executive session with the independent directors.
 
We believe that the role of our Board of Directors in risk oversight is effective and appropriate given the extensive regulation to which we are already subject as a BDC. As a BDC, we are required to comply with certain regulatory requirements that control the levels of risk in our business and operations. For example, we are limited in our ability to enter into transactions with our affiliates, including investing in any portfolio company in which one of our affiliates currently has an investment.
 
Committees of the Board of Directors
 
Our Board of Directors met eight times during our 2010 fiscal year. Each director attended at least 75% of the total number of meetings of the Board and committees on which the director served that were held while the director was a member. Our Board of Directors has established the committees described below. Our Corporate Governance Policy, Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, our and our investment adviser’s Code of Ethics as required by the 1940 Act and our Board Committee charters are available at our corporate governance webpage at http://ir.fifthstreetfinance.com/governance.cfm and are also available to any stockholder who requests them by writing to our secretary, Bernard Berman, at Fifth Street Finance Corp., 10 Bank Street, 12th Floor, White Plains, NY 10606, Attention: Corporate Secretary.


79


Table of Contents

Audit Committee
 
The Audit Committee is responsible for selecting, engaging and discharging our independent accountants, reviewing the plans, scope and results of the audit engagement with our independent accountants, approving professional services provided by our independent accountants (including compensation therefore), reviewing the independence of our independent accountants and reviewing the adequacy of our internal control over financial reporting. The members of the Audit Committee are Messrs. Dunn, Dutkiewicz and Haney, each of whom is not an interested person of us for purposes of the 1940 Act and is independent for purposes of the NYSE corporate governance listing standards. Mr. Haney serves as the chairman of the Audit Committee. Our Board of Directors has determined that Mr. Haney is an “audit committee financial expert” as defined under SEC rules. The Audit Committee met five times during the 2010 fiscal year.
 
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
 
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for determining criteria for service on the Board, identifying, researching and nominating directors for election by our stockholders, selecting nominees to fill vacancies on our Board or a committee of the Board of Directors, developing and recommending to the Board a set of corporate governance principles and overseeing the self-evaluation of the Board and its committees and evaluation of our management. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers nominees properly recommended by our stockholders. The members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are Messrs. Dunn, Haney and Ray, each of whom is not an interested person of us for purposes of the 1940 Act and is independent for purposes of the New York Stock Exchange corporate governance listing standards. Mr. Dunn serves as the chairman of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee met one time during the 2010 fiscal year.
 
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider qualified director nominees recommended by stockholders when such recommendations are submitted in accordance with our Amended and Restated By-laws and any other applicable law, rule or regulation regarding director nominations. Stockholders may submit candidates for nomination for our Board of Directors by writing to: Board of Directors, Fifth Street Finance Corp., 10 Bank Street, 12th Floor, White Plains, NY 10606. When submitting a nomination to us for consideration, a stockholder must provide certain information about each person whom the stockholder proposes to nominate for election as a director, including: (i) the name, age, business address and residence address of the person; (ii) the principal occupation or employment of the person; (iii) the class or series and number of shares of our capital stock owned beneficially or of record by the persons; and (iv) any other information relating to the person that would be required to be disclosed in a proxy statement or other filings required to be made in connection with solicitations of proxies for election of directors pursuant to Section 14 of the Exchange Act, and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder. Such notice must be accompanied by the proposed nominee’s written consent to be named as a nominee and to serve as a director if elected.
 
In evaluating director nominees, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers the following facts:
 
  •  the appropriate size and composition of our Board;
 
  •  our needs with respect to the particular talents and experience of our directors;
 
  •  the knowledge, skills and experience of nominees in light of prevailing business conditions and the knowledge, skills and experience already possessed by other members of our Board;
 
  •  the capacity and desire to serve as a member of our Board of Directors and to represent the balanced, best interests of our stockholders as a whole;
 
  •  experience with accounting rules and practices; and
 
  •  the desire to balance the considerable benefit of continuity with the periodic addition of the fresh perspective provided by new members.


80


Table of Contents

 
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s goal is to assemble a board of directors that brings us a variety of perspectives and skills derived from high quality business and professional experience.
 
Other than the foregoing, there are no stated minimum criteria for director nominees, although the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may also consider such other factors as it may deem are in our best interests and those of our stockholders. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also believes it appropriate for certain key members of our management to participate as members of the Board. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee does not assign specific weights to particular criteria and no particular criterion is necessarily applicable to all prospective nominees. We believe that the backgrounds and qualifications of the directors, considered as a group, should provide a significant composite mix of experience, knowledge and abilities that will allow the Board to fulfill its responsibilities. Our Board does not have a specific diversity policy, but considers diversity of race, religion, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, disability, cultural background and professional experiences in evaluating candidates for Board membership.
 
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee identifies nominees by first evaluating the current members of the Board willing to continue in service. Current members of the Board with skills and experience that are relevant to our business and who are willing to continue in service are considered for re-nomination, balancing the value of continuity of service by existing members of the Board with that of obtaining a new perspective. If any member of the Board does not wish to continue in service or if the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee or the Board decides not to re-nominate a member for re-election, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee identifies the desired skills and experience of a new nominee in light of the criteria above. Current members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and Board are polled for suggestions as to individuals meeting the criteria of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Research may also be performed to identify qualified individuals. We have not engaged third parties to identify or evaluate or assist in identifying potential nominees to the Board.
 
Valuation Committee
 
The Valuation Committee establishes guidelines and makes recommendations to our Board regarding the valuation of our loans and investments. The Valuation Committee is presently composed of Messrs. Dutkiewicz, Haney, Meyer and Ray, each of whom is not an interested person of us for purposes of the 1940 Act and is independent for purposes of the NYSE corporate governance listing standards. Mr. Meyer serves as the chairman of the Valuation Committee. The Valuation Committee met on five occasions during the 2010 fiscal year.
 
Compensation Committee
 
The Compensation Committee is responsible for reviewing and approving the reimbursement by us of the compensation of our chief financial officer and his staff, and the staff of our chief compliance officer. The current members of the Compensation Committee are Messrs. Dunn, Meyer and Ray, each of whom is not an interested person of us for purposes of the 1940 Act and is independent for purposes of the NYSE corporate governance listing standards. Mr. Ray serves as the chairman of the Compensation Committee. As discussed below, currently, none of our executive officers are compensated by us. The Compensation Committee met one time during our 2010 fiscal year.


81


Table of Contents

Executive Compensation
 
Compensation of Directors
 
The following table sets forth compensation of our directors for the year ended September 30, 2010.
 
                 
    Fees Earned or
   
Name
  Paid in Cash(1)(2)   Total
 
Interested Directors
               
Bernard D. Berman
           
Leonard M. Tannenbaum
           
Independent Directors
               
Adam C. Berkman(3)
  $ 11,500     $ 11,500  
Brian S. Dunn
  $ 54,500     $ 54,500  
Richard P. Dutkiewicz(4)
  $ 25,418     $ 25,418  
Byron J. Haney
  $ 69,500     $ 69,500  
Frank C. Meyer
  $ 65,000     $ 65,000  
Douglas F. Ray
  $ 52,500     $ 52,500  
 
 
(1) For a discussion of the independent directors’ compensation, see below.
 
(2) We do not maintain a stock or option plan, non-equity incentive plan or pension plan for our directors.
 
(3) Mr. Berkman resigned from the Board of Directors on February 24, 2010 due to personal time constraints.
 
(4) Mr. Dutkiewicz was appointed to the Board of Directors on February 24, 2010.
 
For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010, the independent directors received an annual retainer fee of $30,000, payable once per year if the director attended at least 75% of the meetings held during the previous year, plus $2,000 for each board meeting in which the director attended in person and $1,000 for each board meeting in which the director participated other than in person, and reimbursement of reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with attending each board meeting. The independent directors also received $1,000 for each committee meeting in which they attended in person and $500 for each committee meeting in which they participated other than in person, in connection with each committee meeting of the Board that they attended, plus reimbursement of reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with attending each committee meeting not held concurrently with a board meeting.
 
In addition, the chairman of the Audit Committee received an annual retainer of $20,000, while the chairman of the Valuation Committee and the chairman of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee each received an annual retainer of $20,000 and $5,000, respectively. No compensation was paid to directors who are interested persons of us as defined in the 1940 Act.
 
Effective as of October 1, 2010, the annual retainer fee received by the independent directors was amended to (i) $20,000, payable once per year if a non-management director not on any committee attends at least 75% of the meetings held during the previous year, (ii) $40,000, payable once per year if a non-management director on one committee attends at least 75% of the meetings held the previous year, (iii) $50,000, payable once per year if a non-management director on two committees attends at least 75% of the meetings held the previous year, and (iv) $60,000, payable once per year if a non-management director on three committees attends at least 75% of the meetings held the previous year. In addition, the fees for Board meeting attendance were increased from $2,000 for each meeting a non-management director attended in person, to $2,500 for each Board meeting in which a non-management director attended in person and the chairman of the Compensation Committee will receive an annual retainer of $5,000.


82


Table of Contents

Compensation of Executive Officers
 
None of our executive officers receive direct compensation from us. The compensation of the principals and other investment professionals of our investment adviser are paid by our investment adviser. Compensation paid to William H. Craig, our chief financial officer, is set by our administrator, FSC, Inc., and is subject to reimbursement by us of an allocable portion of such compensation for services rendered to us. FSC, Inc. has voluntarily determined to forgo receiving reimbursement for the services performed for us by our chief compliance officer, Bernard D. Berman. However, although FSC, Inc. currently intends to forgo its right to receive such reimbursement, it is under no obligation to do so and may cease to do so at any time in the future. During fiscal year 2010, we reimbursed FSC, Inc. approximately $1.3 million for the allocable portion of compensation expenses incurred by FSC, Inc. on behalf of Mr. Craig and other support personnel, pursuant to the administration agreement with FSC, Inc.


83


Table of Contents

 
PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT
 
The management of our investment portfolio is the responsibility of our investment adviser, and its Investment Committee, which currently consists of Leonard M. Tannenbaum, our chief executive officer and managing partner of our investment adviser, Bernard D. Berman, our president, chief compliance officer and secretary and a partner of our investment adviser, Ivelin M. Dimitrov, our co-chief investment officer and a partner of our investment adviser and Chad S. Blakeman, our co-chief investment officer. For more information regarding the business experience of Messrs. Tannenbaum, Berman, Dimitrov, Blakeman and Craig, see “Business — The Investment Adviser,” “Management — Biographical Information — Interested Directors” and “— Non-Director Executive Officers.”
 
Investment Personnel
 
Our investment adviser’s investment personnel consists of its portfolio managers and principals, Messrs. Tannenbaum, Berman, Dimitrov, Blakeman, Alva, Zmijeski and Craig, who, in addition to our investment adviser’s Investment Committee, are primarily responsible for the day-to-day management of our portfolio.
 
The portfolio managers of our investment adviser will not be employed by us, and will receive no compensation from us in connection with their activities. The portfolio managers receive compensation that includes an annual base salary, an annual individual performance bonus, contributions to 401(k) plans, and a portion of the incentive fee or carried interest earned in connection with their services.
 
As of December 31, 2010, the portfolio managers of our investment adviser were also responsible for the day-to-day portfolio management of Fifth Street Mezzanine Partners II, L.P., a private investment fund that as of that date had total commitments of $157.1 million and assets of approximately $54.2 million. Fifth Street Mezzanine Partners II, L.P. and Fifth Street have similar investment objectives, however, Fifth Street Mezzanine Partners II, L.P. generally is fully committed and, other than follow-on investments in existing portfolio companies, is no longer making investments. However, the portfolio managers of our investment adviser could face conflicts of interest in the allocation of investment opportunities to Fifth Street and Fifth Street Mezzanine Partners II, L.P. in certain circumstances.
 
Below are the biographies for the portfolio managers whose biographies are not included elsewhere in this prospectus.
 
  •  Juan E. Alva.  Mr. Alva is a partner of our investment adviser. Mr. Alva joined our investment adviser in January 2007 and is responsible for deal origination in the Western United States. From March 1993 to January 2000, he worked at Goldman, Sachs & Co., in its investment banking division, focusing on mergers & acquisitions and corporate finance transactions. Mr. Alva was also chief financial officer of ClickServices.com, Inc., a software company, from 2000 to 2002, and most recently, from 2003 to 2006 he was a senior investment banker at Trinity Capital LLC, a boutique investment bank focused on small-cap transactions. Mr. Alva graduated from the University of Pennsylvania with a B.S. from the Wharton School and a B.S.E. from the School of Engineering and Applied Science.
 
  •  Casey J. Zmijeski.  Mr. Zmijeski has been a partner of our investment adviser since June 2010. Mr. Zmijeski is responsible for developing private equity sponsor relationships and originating loans in the Eastern Region of the United States. Mr. Zmijeski joined us after spending nearly four years at Churchill Financial in New York where he was responsible for originating and structuring debt financing opportunities for middle market private equity firms from 2006 to 2009. Mr. Zmijeski held similar responsibilities with CapitalSource in New York from 2003 to 2006. From 1999 to 2003, Mr. Zmijeski worked at Heller Financial and GE Capital in their middle market leveraged finance groups. Prior to this time, Mr. Zmijeski spent over seven years with ING as a member of their Merchant Banking Group and Corporate Finance Advisory Group. Mr. Zmijeski graduated from Emory University with an M.B.A. in Finance and has an A.B. in Anthropology from Duke University.


84


Table of Contents

 
The table below shows the dollar range of shares of common stock beneficially owned by each portfolio manager of our investment adviser as of December 31, 2010.
 
     
Name of Portfolio Manager
 
Dollar Range of Equity Securities in Fifth Street(1)(2)(3)
 
Leonard M. Tannenbaum
  Over $1,000,000
Bernard D. Berman
  $100,001 — $500,000
Ivelin M. Dimitrov
  $50,001 — $100,000
Chad S. Blakeman
  none
Juan E. Alva
  $100,001 — $500,000
Casey J. Zmijeski
  $50,001 — $100,000
William H. Craig
  $100,001 — $500,000
 
 
(1) Beneficial ownership has been determined in accordance with Rule 16a-1(a)(2) of the Exchange Act.
 
(2) The dollar range of equity securities beneficially owned is based on a stock price of $12.14 per share as of December 31, 2010.
 
(3) The dollar range of equity securities beneficially owned are: none, $1-$10,000, $10,001-$50,000, $50,001-$100,000, $100,001-$500,000, $500,001-$1,000,000, or over $1,000,000.


85


Table of Contents

 
INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT
 
Overview of Our Investment Adviser
 
Management Services
 
Our investment adviser, Fifth Street Management, is registered as an investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, or the “Advisers Act.” Our investment adviser serves pursuant to the investment advisory agreement in accordance with the 1940 Act. Subject to the overall supervision of our Board of Directors, our investment adviser manages our day-to-day operations and provides us with investment advisory services. Under the terms of the investment advisory agreement, our investment adviser:
 
  •  determines the composition of our portfolio, the nature and timing of the changes to our portfolio and the manner of implementing such changes;
 
  •  determines what securities we purchase, retain or sell;
 
  •  identifies, evaluates and negotiates the structure of the investments we make; and
 
  •  executes, monitors and services the investments we make.
 
Our investment adviser’s services under the investment advisory agreement may not be exclusive and it is free to furnish similar services to other entities so long as its services to us are not impaired.
 
Management Fee
 
We pay our investment adviser a fee for its services under the investment advisory agreement consisting of two components — a base management fee and an incentive fee. The cost of both the base management fee payable to our investment adviser and any incentive fees earned by our investment adviser will ultimately be borne by our common stockholders.
 
Base Management Fee
 
The base management fee is calculated at an annual rate of 2% of our gross assets, which includes any borrowings for investment purposes. The base management fee is payable quarterly in arrears, and is calculated based on the value of our gross assets at the end of each fiscal quarter, and appropriately adjusted on a pro rata basis for any equity capital raises or repurchases during such quarter. The base management fee for any partial month or quarter will be appropriately pro rated. Our investment adviser permanently waived the portion of the base management fee attributable to cash and cash equivalents (as defined in the notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements) as of the end of each quarter beginning March 31, 2010. As a result, our base management fee will be calculated at an annual rate of 2% of our gross assets, including any investments made with borrowings, but excluding any cash and cash equivalents (as defined in the notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements) as of the end of each quarter.
 
Incentive Fee
 
The incentive fee has two parts. The first part is calculated and payable quarterly in arrears based on our “Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income” for the immediately preceding fiscal quarter. For this purpose, “Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income” means interest income, dividend income and any other income (including any other fees (other than fees for providing managerial assistance), such as commitment, origination, structuring, diligence and consulting fees or other fees that we receive from portfolio companies) accrued during the fiscal quarter, minus our operating expenses for the quarter (including the base management fee, expenses payable under the administration agreement with FSC, Inc., and any interest expense and dividends paid on any issued and outstanding preferred stock, but excluding the incentive fee). Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income includes, in the case of investments with a deferred interest feature (such as original issue discount, debt instruments with PIK interest and zero coupon securities), accrued income that we have not yet received in cash. Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income does not include any realized capital gains, realized capital losses or unrealized capital appreciation or depreciation. Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income, expressed as a rate of return on the value of


86


Table of Contents

our net assets at the end of the immediately preceding fiscal quarter, will be compared to a “hurdle rate” of 2% per quarter (8% annualized), subject to a “catch-up” provision measured as of the end of each fiscal quarter. Our net investment income used to calculate this part of the incentive fee is also included in the amount of our gross assets used to calculate the 2% base management fee. The operation of the incentive fee with respect to our Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income for each quarter is as follows:
 
  •  no incentive fee is payable to the investment adviser in any fiscal quarter in which our Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income does not exceed the hurdle rate of 2% (the “preferred return” or “hurdle”);
 
  •  100% of our Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income with respect to that portion of such Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income, if any, that exceeds the hurdle rate but is less than or equal to 2.5% in any fiscal quarter (10% annualized) is payable to the investment adviser. We refer to this portion of our Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income (which exceeds the hurdle rate but is less than or equal to 2.5%) as the “catch-up.” The “catch-up” provision is intended to provide our investment adviser with an incentive fee of 20% on all of our Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income as if a hurdle rate did not apply when our Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income exceeds 2.5% in any fiscal quarter; and
 
  •  20% of the amount of our Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income, if any, that exceeds 2.5% in any fiscal quarter (10% annualized) is payable to the investment adviser once the hurdle is reached and the catch-up is achieved.
 
The following is a graphical representation of the calculation of the income-related portion of the incentive fee:
 
Quarterly Incentive Fee Based on “Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income”
Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income
(expressed as a percentage of the value of net assets)
 
(Chart)
Percentage of Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment
Income allocated to income-related portion of incentive fee
 
The second part of the incentive fee is determined and payable in arrears as of the end of each fiscal year (or upon termination of the investment advisory agreement, as of the termination date) and equals 20% of our realized capital gains, if any, on a cumulative basis from inception through the end of each fiscal year, computed net of all realized capital losses and unrealized capital depreciation on a cumulative basis, less the aggregate amount of any previously paid capital gain incentive fees, provided that, the incentive fee determined as of September 30, 2008 was calculated for a period of shorter than twelve calendar months to take into account any realized capital gains computed net of all realized capital losses and unrealized capital depreciation from inception.
 
Example 1: Income Related Portion of Incentive Fee for Each Fiscal Quarter
 
Alternative 1
 
Assumptions
 
Investment income (including interest, dividends, fees, etc.) = 1.25%
 
Hurdle rate(1) = 2%


87


Table of Contents

Management fee(2) = 0.5%
 
Other expenses (legal, accounting, custodian, transfer agent, etc.)(3) = 0.2%
 
Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income
 
(investment income − (management fee + other expenses) = 0.55%
 
Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income does not exceed hurdle rate, therefore there is no income-related incentive fee.
 
Alternative 2
 
Assumptions
 
Investment income (including interest, dividends, fees, etc.) = 2.9%
 
Hurdle rate(1) = 2%
 
Management fee(2) = 0.5%
 
Other expenses (legal, accounting, custodian, transfer agent, etc.)(3) = 0.2%
 
Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income
 
(investment income − (management fee + other expenses) = 2.2%
 
Incentive fee = 100% × Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income (subject to “catch-up”)(4)
= 100% × (2.2% – 2%)
= 0.2%
 
Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income exceeds the hurdle rate, but does not fully satisfy the “catch-up” provision, therefore the income related portion of the incentive fee is 0.2%.
 
Alternative 3
 
Assumptions
 
Investment income (including interest, dividends, fees, etc.) = 3.5%
 
Hurdle rate(1) = 2%
 
Management fee(2) = 0.5%
 
Other expenses (legal, accounting, custodian, transfer agent, etc.)(3) = 0.2%
 
Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income
 
(investment income − (management fee + other expenses) = 2.8%
 
Incentive fee = 100% × Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income (subject to “catch-up”)(4)
 
Incentive fee = 100% × “catch-up” + (20% × (Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income – 2.5%))
 
Catch up = 2.5% – 2%
= 0.5%
 
Incentive fee = (100% × 0.5%) + (20% × (2.8% – 2.5%))
= 0.5% + (20% × 0.3%)
= 0.5% + 0.06%
= 0.56%


88


Table of Contents

 
Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income exceeds the hurdle rate, and fully satisfies the “catch-up” provision, therefore the income related portion of the incentive fee is 0.56%.
 
 
(1) Represents 8% annualized hurdle rate.
 
(2) Represents 2% annualized base management fee.
 
(3) Excludes organizational and offering expenses.
 
(4) The “catch-up” provision is intended to provide our investment adviser with an incentive fee of 20% on all Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income as if a hurdle rate did not apply when our net investment income exceeds 2.5% in any fiscal quarter.
 
Example 2: Capital Gains Portion of Incentive Fee(*):
 
Alternative 1:
 
Assumptions
 
Year 1: $20 million investment made in Company A (“Investment A”), and $30 million investment made in Company B (“Investment B”)
 
Year 2: Investment A sold for $50 million and fair market value (“FMV”) of Investment B determined to be $32 million
 
Year 3: FMV of Investment B determined to be $25 million
 
Year 4: Investment B sold for $31 million
 
The capital gains portion of the incentive fee would be:
 
Year 1: None
 
Year 2: Capital gains incentive fee of $6 million — ($30 million realized capital gains on sale of Investment A multiplied by 20%)
 
Year 3: None — $5 million (20% multiplied by ($30 million cumulative capital gains less $5 million cumulative capital depreciation)) less $6 million (previous capital gains fee paid in Year 2)
 
Year 4: Capital gains incentive fee of $200,000 — $6.2 million ($31 million cumulative realized capital gains multiplied by 20%) less $6 million (capital gains incentive fee taken in Year 2)
 
Alternative 2
 
Assumptions
 
Year 1: $20 million investment made in Company A (“Investment A”), $30 million investment made in Company B (“Investment B”) and $25 million investment made in Company C (“Investment C”)
 
Year 2: Investment A sold for $50 million, FMV of Investment B determined to be $25 million and FMV of Investment C determined to be $25 million
 
Year 3: FMV of Investment B determined to be $27 million and Investment C sold for $30 million
 
Year 4: FMV of Investment B determined to be $35 million
 
Year 5: Investment B sold for $20 million
 
The capital gains incentive fee, if any, would be:
 
Year 1: None
 
Year 2: $5 million capital gains incentive fee — 20% multiplied by $25 million ($30 million realized capital gains on Investment A less unrealized capital depreciation on Investment B)


89


Table of Contents

Year 3: $1.4 million capital gains incentive fee(1) — $6.4 million (20% multiplied by $32 million ($35 million cumulative realized capital gains less $3 million unrealized capital depreciation)) less $5 million capital gains incentive fee received in Year 2
 
Year 4: None
 
Year 5: None — $5 million (20% multiplied by $25 million (cumulative realized capital gains of $35 million less realized capital losses of $10 million)) less $6.4 million cumulative capital gains incentive fee paid in Year 2 and Year 3(2)
 
 
 
 * The hypothetical amounts of returns shown are based on a percentage of our total net assets and assume no leverage. There is no guarantee that positive returns will be realized and actual returns may vary from those shown in this example.
 
(1) As illustrated in Year 3 of Alternative 1 above, if Fifth Street were to be wound up on a date other than its fiscal year end of any year, Fifth Street may have paid aggregate capital gains incentive fees that are more than the amount of such fees that would be payable if Fifth Street had been wound up on its fiscal year end of such year.
 
(2) As noted above, it is possible that the cumulative aggregate capital gains fee received by our investment adviser ($6.4 million) is effectively greater than $5 million (20% of cumulative aggregate realized capital gains less net realized capital losses or net unrealized depreciation ($25 million)).
 
Payment of Our Expenses
 
Our primary operating expenses are the payment of a base management fee and any incentive fees under the investment advisory agreement and the allocable portion of overhead and other expenses incurred by FSC, Inc. in performing its obligations under the administration agreement. Our investment management fee compensates our investment adviser for its work in identifying, evaluating, negotiating, executing and servicing our investments. We bear all other expenses of our operations and transactions, including (without limitation) fees and expenses relating to:
 
  •  offering expenses;
 
  •  the investigation and monitoring of our investments;
 
  •  the cost of calculating our net asset value;
 
  •  the cost of effecting sales and repurchases of shares of our common stock and other securities;
 
  •  management and incentive fees payable pursuant to the investment advisory agreement;
 
  •  fees payable to third parties relating to, or associated with, making investments and valuing investments (including third-party valuation firms);
 
  •  transfer agent and custodial fees;
 
  •  fees and expenses associated with marketing efforts (including attendance at investment conferences and similar events);
 
  •  federal and state registration fees;
 
  •  any exchange listing fees;
 
  •  federal, state and local taxes;
 
  •  independent directors’ fees and expenses;
 
  •  brokerage commissions;
 
  •  costs of proxy statements, stockholders’ reports and notices;
 
  •  costs of preparing government filings, including periodic and current reports with the SEC;
 
  •  fidelity bond, liability insurance and other insurance premiums; and


90


Table of Contents

 
  •  printing, mailing, independent accountants and outside legal costs and all other direct expenses incurred by either our investment adviser or us in connection with administering our business, including payments under the administration agreement that will be based upon our allocable portion of overhead and other expenses incurred by FSC, Inc. in performing its obligations under the administration agreement and the compensation of our chief financial officer and chief compliance officer, and their staff. FSC, Inc. has voluntarily determined to forgo receiving reimbursement for the services performed for us by our chief compliance officer, Bernard D. Berman, given his compensation arrangement with our investment adviser. However, although FSC, Inc. currently intends to forgo its right to receive such reimbursement, it is under no obligation to do so and may cease to do so at any time in the future.
 
Duration and Termination
 
The investment advisory agreement was first approved by our Board of Directors on December 13, 2007 and by a majority of the limited partners of Fifth Street Mezzanine Partners III, L.P. through a written consent first solicited on December 14, 2007. On March 14, 2008, our Board of Directors, including all of the directors who are not “interested persons” as defined in the 1940 Act, approved an amendment to the investment advisory agreement that revised the investment advisory agreement to clarify the calculation of the base management fee. Such amendment was also approved by a majority of our outstanding voting securities through a written consent first solicited on April 7, 2008. Unless earlier terminated as described below, the investment advisory agreement, as amended, will remain in effect for a period of two years from the date it was approved by the Board of Directors and will remain in effect from year-to-year thereafter if approved annually by the Board of Directors or by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of our outstanding voting securities, including, in either case, approval by a majority of our directors who are not interested persons. The investment advisory agreement will automatically terminate in the event of its assignment. The investment advisory agreement may be terminated by either party without penalty upon not more than 60 days’ written notice to the other. The investment advisory agreement may also be terminated, without penalty, upon the vote of a majority of our outstanding voting securities.
 
Indemnification
 
The investment advisory agreement provides that, absent willful misfeasance, bad faith or gross negligence in the performance of their respective duties or by reason of the reckless disregard of their respective duties and obligations, our investment adviser and its officers, managers, agents, employees, controlling persons, members (or their owners) and any other person or entity affiliated with it, are entitled to indemnification from us for any damages, liabilities, costs and expenses (including reasonable attorneys’ fees and amounts reasonably paid in settlement) arising from the rendering of our investment adviser’s services under the investment advisory agreement or otherwise as our investment adviser.
 
Organization of our Investment Adviser
 
Our investment adviser is a Delaware limited liability company that registered as an investment adviser under the Advisers Act. The principal address of our investment adviser is 10 Bank Street, 12th Floor, White Plains, NY 10606.
 
Board Approval of the Investment Advisory Agreement
 
At a meeting of our Board of Directors held on March 1, 2011, our Board of Directors unanimously voted to approve the investment advisory agreement. In reaching a decision to approve the investment advisory agreement, the Board of Directors reviewed a significant amount of information and considered, among other things:
 
  •  the nature, quality and extent of the advisory and other services to be provided to us by Fifth Street Management;
 
  •  the fee structures of comparable externally managed business development companies that engage in similar investing activities;


91


Table of Contents

 
  •  our projected operating expenses and expense ratio compared to business development companies with similar investment objectives;
 
  •  any existing and potential sources of indirect income to Fifth Street Management from its relationship with us and the profitability of that relationship, including through the investment advisory agreement;
 
  •  information about the services to be performed and the personnel performing such services under the investment advisory agreement;
 
  •  the organizational capability and financial condition of Fifth Street Management and its affiliates; and
 
  •  various other matters.
 
Based on the information reviewed and the discussions detailed above, the Board of Directors, including all of the directors who are not “interested persons” as defined in the 1940 Act, concluded that the investment advisory fee rates and terms are reasonable in relation to the services provided and approved the investment advisory agreement and the administration agreement as being in the best interests of our stockholders.


92


Table of Contents

 
ADMINISTRATION AGREEMENT
 
We have also entered into an administration agreement with FSC, Inc. under which FSC, Inc. provides administrative services for us, including office facilities and equipment and clerical, bookkeeping and recordkeeping services at such facilities. Under the administration agreement, FSC, Inc. also performs, or oversees the performance of, our required administrative services, which includes being responsible for the financial records which we are required to maintain and preparing reports to our stockholders and reports filed with the SEC. In addition, FSC, Inc. assists us in determining and publishing our net asset value, overseeing the preparation and filing of our tax returns and the printing and dissemination of reports to our stockholders, and generally overseeing the payment of our expenses and the performance of administrative and professional services rendered to us by others. For providing these services, facilities and personnel, we reimburse FSC, Inc. the allocable portion of overhead and other expenses incurred by FSC, Inc. in performing its obligations under the administration agreement, including rent and our allocable portion of the costs of compensation and related expenses of our chief financial officer and chief compliance officer, and their staff. FSC, Inc. has voluntarily determined to forgo receiving reimbursement for the services performed for us by our chief compliance officer, Bernard D. Berman, given his compensation arrangement with our investment adviser. However, although FSC, Inc. currently intends to forgo its right to receive such reimbursement, it is under no obligation to do so and may cease to do so at any time in the future. FSC, Inc. may also provide on our behalf managerial assistance to our portfolio companies. The administration agreement may be terminated by either party without penalty upon 60 days’ written notice to the other party.
 
The administration agreement provides that, absent willful misfeasance, bad faith or gross negligence in the performance of their respective duties or by reason of the reckless disregard of their respective duties and obligations, FSC, Inc. and its officers, managers, agents, employees, controlling persons, members and any other person or entity affiliated with it are entitled to indemnification from us for any damages, liabilities, costs and expenses (including reasonable attorneys’ fees and amounts reasonably paid in settlement) arising from the rendering of services under the administration agreement or otherwise as administrator for us.
 
LICENSE AGREEMENT
 
We have also entered into a license agreement with Fifth Street Capital LLC pursuant to which Fifth Street Capital LLC has agreed to grant us a non-exclusive, royalty-free license to use the name “Fifth Street.” Under this agreement, we will have a right to use the “Fifth Street” name, for so long as Fifth Street Management or one of its affiliates remains our investment adviser. Other than with respect to this limited license, we will have no legal right to the “Fifth Street” name.


93


Table of Contents

 
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
 
We have entered into an investment advisory agreement with Fifth Street Management, our investment adviser. Fifth Street Management is controlled by Leonard M. Tannenbaum, its managing member and the chairman of our Board and our chief executive officer. Pursuant to the investment advisory agreement, fees payable to our investment adviser will be equal to (a) a base management fee of 2.0% of the value of our gross assets, which includes any borrowings for investment purposes, and (b) an incentive fee based on our performance. Our investment adviser has agreed to permanently waive that portion of its base management fee attributable to our assets held in the form of cash and cash equivalents as of the end of each quarter beginning on March 31, 2010. The incentive fee consists of two parts. The first part is calculated and payable quarterly in arrears and equals 20% of our “Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income” for the immediately preceding quarter, subject to a preferred return, or “hurdle,” and a “catch up” feature. The second part is determined and payable in arrears as of the end of each fiscal year (or upon termination of the investment advisory agreement) and equals 20% of our “Incentive Fee Capital Gains,” which equals our realized capital gains on a cumulative basis from inception through the end of the year, if any, computed net of all realized capital losses and unrealized capital depreciation on a cumulative basis, less the aggregate amount of any previously paid capital gain incentive fee.
 
The investment advisory agreement may be terminated by either party without penalty upon no fewer than 60 days’ written notice to the other. Since we entered into the investment advisory agreement in December 2007, we have paid our investment adviser $8,375,888, $13,729,321 and $20,031,299 for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2008, 2009 and 2010 respectively, under the investment advisory agreement.
 
Pursuant to the administration agreement with FSC, Inc., which is controlled by Mr. Tannenbaum, FSC, Inc. will furnish us with the facilities and administrative services necessary to conduct our day-to-day operations, including equipment, clerical, bookkeeping and recordkeeping services at such facilities. In addition, FSC, Inc. will assist us in connection with the determination and publishing of our net asset value, the preparation and filing of tax returns and the printing and dissemination of reports to our stockholders. We will pay FSC, Inc. our allocable portion of overhead and other expenses incurred by it in performing its obligations under the administration agreement, including a portion of the rent and the compensation of our chief financial officer and our chief compliance officer, and their staff. FSC, Inc. has voluntarily determined to forgo receiving reimbursement for the services performed for us by our chief compliance officer, Bernard D. Berman. However, although FSC, Inc. currently intends to forgo its right to receive such reimbursement, it is under no obligation to do so and may cease to do so at any time in the future. The administration agreement may be terminated by either party without penalty upon no fewer than 60 days’ written notice to the other. Since we entered into the administration agreement in December 2007, we have paid FSC, Inc. $1,569,912, $1,295,512 and $2,375,015 for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2008, 2009 and 2010 respectively, under the administration agreement.
 
We have also entered into a license agreement with Fifth Street Capital LLC pursuant to which Fifth Street Capital LLC has agreed to grant us a non-exclusive, royalty-free license to use the name “Fifth Street.” Under this agreement, we will have a right to use the “Fifth Street” name, for so long as Fifth Street Management LLC or one of its affiliates remains our investment adviser. Other than with respect to this limited license, we will have no legal right to the “Fifth Street” name. Fifth Street Capital LLC is controlled by Mr. Tannenbaum, its managing member.


94


Table of Contents

 
CONTROL PERSONS AND PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS
 
The following table sets forth, as of December 31, 2010, the beneficial ownership of each director, each executive officer, each person known to us to beneficially own 5% or more of the outstanding shares of our common stock, and the executive officers and directors as a group. Percentage of beneficial ownership is based on 55,059,057 shares of common stock outstanding as of December 31, 2010.
 
Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC and includes voting or investment power with respect to the securities. Ownership information for those persons who beneficially own 5% or more of our shares of common stock is based upon filings by such persons with the SEC and other information obtained from such persons, if available.
 
Unless otherwise indicated, the company believes that each beneficial owner set forth in the table has sole voting and investment power and has the same address as the company. The company’s directors are divided into two groups — interested directors and independent directors. Interested directors are “interested persons” of Fifth Street Finance Corp. as defined in Section 2(a)(19) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “1940 Act”). Unless otherwise indicated, the address of all executive officers and directors is c/o Fifth Street Finance Corp., 10 Bank Street, 12th Floor, White Plains, NY 10606.
 
                 
    Number of
   
    Shares Owned
   
Name
  Beneficially   Percentage
 
Interested Directors:
               
Leonard M. Tannenbaum(1)
    1,461,690       2.65 %
Bernard D. Berman(2)
    13,468       *  
Independent Directors:
               
Brian S. Dunn(3)
    8,000       *  
Richard P. Dutkiewicz(3)
    1,000       *  
Byron J. Haney(4)
    10,000       *  
Frank C. Meyer
    101,628       *  
Douglas F. Ray
    2,872       *  
Executive Officers:
               
William H. Craig(5)
    10,052       *  
Chad S. Blakeman
           
Ivelin M. Dimitrov
    8,412       *  
All officers and directors as a group (ten persons)
    1,617,122       2.94 %
 
 
Represents less than 1%.
 
(1) The total number of shares reported includes: 1,461,690 shares of which Mr. Tannenbaum is the direct beneficial owner; 725,000 shares which Mr. Tannenbaum holds in a margin account; and 20,000 shares owned by the Leonard M. Tannenbaum Foundation, a 501(c)(3) corporation for which Mr. Tannenbaum serves as the president. With respect to the 20,000 shares held by the Leonard M. Tannenbaum Foundation, Mr. Tannenbaum has sole voting and investment power over all 20,000 shares, but has no pecuniary interest in, and expressly disclaims beneficial ownership of, the shares.
 
(2) Includes 13,100 shares held in margin accounts.
 
(3) Shares are held in a brokerage account and may be used as security on a margin basis.
 
(4) Includes 5,000 shares held in a margin account.
 
(5) Pursuant to Rule 16a-1, Mr. Craig disclaims beneficial ownership of 6,552 shares of common stock owned by his spouse.


95


Table of Contents

 
The following table sets forth, as of December 31, 2010, the dollar range of our equity securities that is beneficially owned by each of our directors and nominees for director. We are not part of a “family of investment companies,” as that term is defined in the 1940 Act.
 
     
    Dollar Range of Equity
    Securities Beneficially Owned(1)(2)(3)
 
Interested Directors:
   
Leonard M. Tannenbaum
  Over $1,000,000
Bernard D. Berman
  $100,001 — $500,000
Independent Directors:
   
Brian S. Dunn
  $50,001 — $100,000
Richard P. Dutkiewicz
  $10,001 — $50,000
Byron J. Haney
  $100,001 — $500,000
Frank C. Meyer
  Over $1,000,000
Douglas F. Ray
  $10,001 — $50,000
 
 
(1)   Beneficial ownership has been determined in accordance with Rule 16a-1(a)(2) of the Exchange Act.
 
(2)   The dollar range of equity securities beneficially owned in us is based on the closing price for our common stock of $12.14 on December 31, 2010 on the New York Stock Exchange.
 
(3)   The dollar range of equity securities beneficially owned are: none, $1 — $10,000, $10,001 — $50,000, $50,001 — $100,000, $100,001 — $500,000, $500,001 — $1,000,000, or over $1,000,000.


96


Table of Contents

 
DIVIDEND REINVESTMENT PLAN
 
We have adopted a dividend reinvestment plan that provides for reinvestment of our distributions on behalf of our stockholders, unless a stockholder elects to receive cash as provided below. As a result, if our Board of Directors authorizes, and we declare, a cash distribution, then our stockholders who have not “opted out” of our dividend reinvestment plan will have their cash distributions automatically reinvested in additional shares of our common stock, rather than receiving the cash distributions.
 
No action will be required on the part of a registered stockholder to have their cash distributions reinvested in shares of our common stock. A registered stockholder may elect to receive an entire distribution in cash by notifying American Stock Transfer & Trust Company LLC, the plan administrator and our transfer agent and registrar, in writing so that such notice is received by the plan administrator no later than 3 days prior to the dividend payment date for distributions to stockholders. The plan administrator will set up an account for shares acquired through the plan for each stockholder who has not elected to receive distributions in cash and hold such shares in non-certificated form. Upon request by a stockholder participating in the plan, received in writing not less than 3 days prior to the dividend payment date, the plan administrator will, instead of crediting shares to the participant’s account, issue a certificate registered in the participant’s name for the number of whole shares of our common stock and a check for any fractional share. Those stockholders whose shares are held by a broker or other financial intermediary may receive distributions in cash by notifying their broker or other financial intermediary of their election. If the shareholder request is received less than 3 days prior to the dividend payment date then that dividend will be reinvested. However, all subsequent dividends will be paid out in cash on all balances.
 
We intend to use newly issued shares to implement the plan when our shares are trading at a premium to net asset value. Under such circumstances, the number of shares to be issued to a stockholder is determined by dividing the total dollar amount of the distribution payable to such stockholder by the greater of (a) the current net asset value per share of our common stock, and (b) 95% of the market price per share of our common stock at the close of trading on the payment date fixed by our Board of Directors. Market price per share on that date will be the closing price for such shares on the New York Stock Exchange or, if no sale is reported for such day, at the average of their reported bid and asked prices. We reserve the right to purchase shares in the open market in connection with our implementation of the plan if either (1) the price at which newly-issued shares are to be credited does not exceed 110% of the last determined net asset value of the shares; or (2) we have advised the plan administrator that since such net asset value was last determined, we have become aware of events that indicate the possibility of a material change in the per share net asset value as a result of which the net asset value of the shares on the payment date might be higher than the price at which the plan administrator would credit newly-issued shares to stockholders. Shares purchased in open market transactions by the plan administrator will be allocated to a stockholder based on the average purchase price, excluding any brokerage charges or other charges, of all shares of common stock purchased in the open market.
 
There will be no brokerage charges or other charges for dividend reinvestment to stockholders who participate in the plan. We will pay the plan administrator’s fees under the plan. If a participant elects by written notice to the plan administrator to have the plan administrator sell part or all of the shares held by the plan administrator in the participant’s account and remit the proceeds to the participant, the plan administrator is authorized to deduct a $15.00 transaction fee plus a $0.10 per share brokerage commissions from the proceeds.
 
Stockholders who receive distributions in the form of stock generally are subject to the same federal, state and local tax consequences as are stockholders who elect to receive their distributions in cash; however, since their cash dividends will be reinvested, such stockholders will not receive cash with which to pay any applicable taxes on reinvested dividends. A stockholder’s basis for determining gain or loss upon the sale of stock received in a distribution from us will be equal to the total dollar amount of the distribution payable to the stockholder. Any stock received in a distribution will have a holding period for tax purposes commencing on the day following the day on which the shares are credited to the stockholder’s account.
 
Participants may terminate their accounts under the plan by notifying the plan administrator via its website at www.amstock.com, by filling out the transaction request form located at the bottom of their statement and sending it to the plan administrator at P.O. Box 922, Wall Street Station, New York, New York, 10269-0560, or by calling the plan administrators at 1-866-665-2281.
 
We may terminate the plan upon notice in writing mailed to each participant at least 30 days prior to any record date for the payment of any distribution by us. All correspondence concerning the plan should be directed to the plan administrator by mail at 6201 15th Avenue, Brooklyn, New York, 11219, or by telephone at 1-866-665-2280.


97


Table of Contents

 
DESCRIPTION OF OUR CAPITAL STOCK
 
The following description summarizes material provisions of the Delaware General Corporation Law and our restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws. This summary is not necessarily complete, and we refer you to the Delaware General Corporation Law and our restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws for a more detailed description of the provisions summarized below.
 
Capital Stock
 
Our authorized capital stock consists of 150,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of which 55,059,057 shares were outstanding as of December 31, 2010.
 
Our common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol “FSC.” No stock has been authorized for issuance under any equity compensation plans. Under Delaware law, our stockholders generally will not be personally liable for our debts or obligations.
 
Set forth below is chart describing the classes of our securities outstanding as of December 31, 2010:
 
                         
(1)
  (2)   (3)   (4)
        Amount Held
  Amount Outstanding
    Amount
  by us or for
  Exclusive of Amount
Title of Class
  Authorized   Our Account   Under Column 3
 
Common Stock
    150,000,000             55,059,057  
 
Under the terms of our restated certificate of incorporation, all shares of our common stock will have equal rights as to earnings, assets, dividends and voting and, when they are issued, will be duly authorized, validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable. Distributions may be paid to the holders of our common stock if, as and when authorized by our Board of Directors and declared by us out of funds legally available therefore. Shares of our common stock will have no preemptive, exchange, conversion or redemption rights and will be freely transferable, except where their transfer is restricted by federal and state securities laws or by contract. In the event of our liquidation, dissolution or winding up, each share of our common stock would be entitled to share ratably in all of our assets that are legally available for distribution after we pay all debts and other liabilities and subject to any preferential rights of holders of our preferred stock, if any preferred stock is outstanding at such time. Each share of our common stock will be entitled to one vote on all matters submitted to a vote of stockholders, including the election of directors. The holders of our common stock will possess exclusive voting power. There will be no cumulative voting in the election of directors, which means that holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of common stock will be able to elect all of our directors, and holders of less than a majority of such shares will be unable to elect any director.
 
Limitation on Liability of Directors and Officers; Indemnification and Advance of Expenses
 
Under our restated certificate of incorporation, we will fully indemnify any person who was or is involved in any actual or threatened action, suit or proceeding (whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative) by reason of the fact that such person is or was one of our directors or officers or is or was serving at our request as a director or officer of another corporation, partnership, limited liability company, joint venture, trust or other enterprise, including service with respect to an employee benefit plan, against expenses (including attorney’s fees), judgments, fines and amounts paid or to be paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by such person in connection with such action, suit or proceeding. Our restated certificate of incorporation also provides that our directors will not be personally liable for monetary damages to us for breaches of their fiduciary duty as directors, except for a breach of their duty of loyalty to us or our stockholders, for acts or omissions not in good faith or which involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law, or for any transaction from which the director derived an improper personal benefit. So long as we are regulated under the 1940 Act, the above indemnification and limitation of liability will be limited by the 1940 Act or by any valid rule, regulation or order of the SEC thereunder. The 1940 Act provides, among other things, that a company may not indemnify any director or officer against liability to it or its stockholders to which he or she might otherwise be subject by reason of his or her willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence or reckless disregard of the duties involved in the conduct of his or her office unless a determination is made by final decision of a court, by vote of a majority of a quorum of directors who


98


Table of Contents

are disinterested, non-party directors or by independent legal counsel that the liability for which indemnification is sought did not arise out of the foregoing conduct.
 
Delaware law also provides that indemnification permitted under the law shall not be deemed exclusive of any other rights to which the directors and officers may be entitled under the corporation’s bylaws, any agreement, a vote of stockholders or otherwise.
 
Our restated certificate of incorporation permits us to secure insurance on behalf of any person who is or was or has agreed to become a director or officer of Fifth Street or is or was serving at our request as a director or officer of another enterprise for any liability arising out of his or her actions, regardless of whether the Delaware General Corporation Law would permit indemnification. We have obtained liability insurance for our officers and directors.
 
Delaware Law and Certain Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaw Provisions; Anti-Takeover Measures
 
We are subject to the provisions of Section 203 of the General Corporation Law of Delaware. In general, the statute prohibits a publicly held Delaware corporation from engaging in a “business combination” with “interested stockholders” for a period of three years after the date of the transaction in which the person became an interested stockholder, unless the business combination is approved in a prescribed manner. A “business combination” includes certain mergers, asset sales and other transactions resulting in a financial benefit to the interested stockholder. Subject to exceptions, an “interested stockholder” is a person who, together with his, her or its affiliates and associates, owns, or within three years did own, 15% or more of the corporation’s voting stock.
 
Our restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws provide that:
 
  •  the Board of Directors be divided into three classes, as nearly equal in size as possible, with staggered three-year terms;
 
  •  directors may be removed only for cause by the affirmative vote of the holders of two-thirds of the shares of our capital stock entitled to vote; and
 
  •  any vacancy on the Board of Directors, however the vacancy occurs, including a vacancy due to an enlargement of the Board of Directors, may only be filled by vote of the directors then in office.
 
The classification of our Board of Directors and the limitations on removal of directors and filling of vacancies could have the effect of making it more difficult for a third party to acquire us, or of discouraging a third party from acquiring us.
 
Our restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws also provide that:
 
  •  any action required or permitted to be taken by the stockholders at an annual meeting or special meeting of stockholders may only be taken if it is properly brought before such meeting and may not be taken by written action in lieu of a meeting; and
 
  •  special meetings of the stockholders may only be called by our Board of Directors, chairman or chief executive officer.
 
Our amended and restated bylaws provide that, in order for any matter to be considered “properly brought” before a meeting, a stockholder must comply with requirements regarding advance notice to us. These provisions could delay until the next stockholders’ meeting stockholder actions which are favored by the holders of a majority of our outstanding voting securities. These provisions may also discourage another person or entity from making a tender offer for our common stock, because such person or entity, even if it acquired a majority of our outstanding voting securities, would be able to take action as a stockholder (such as electing new directors or approving a merger) only at a duly called stockholders meeting, and not by written consent.
 
Delaware’s corporation law provides generally that the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares entitled to vote on any matter is required to amend a corporation’s certificate of incorporation or bylaws, unless a corporation’s certificate of incorporation or bylaws requires a greater percentage. Under our amended and restated bylaws and our restated certificate of incorporation, the affirmative vote of the holders of at least 662/3% of the shares of our capital stock entitled to vote will be required to amend or repeal any of the provisions of our amended and restated bylaws.


99


Table of Contents

However, the vote of at least 662/3% of the shares of our capital stock then outstanding and entitled to vote in the election of directors, voting together as a single class, will be required to amend or repeal any provision of our restated certificate of incorporation pertaining to the Board of Directors, limitation of liability, indemnification, stockholder action or amendments to our certificate of incorporation. In addition, our restated certificate of incorporation permits our Board of Directors to amend or repeal our amended and restated bylaws by a majority vote.


100


Table of Contents

 
MATERIAL U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS
 
The following discussion is a general summary of the material U.S. federal income tax considerations applicable to us and to an investment in our shares. This summary does not purport to be a complete description of the income tax considerations applicable to such an investment. For example, we have not described tax consequences that may be relevant to certain types of holders subject to special treatment under U.S. federal income tax laws, including stockholders subject to the alternative minimum tax, tax-exempt organizations, insurance companies, dealers in securities, a trader in securities that elects to use a market-to-market method of accounting for its securities holdings, pension plans and trusts, and financial institutions. This summary assumes that investors hold our common stock as capital assets (within the meaning of the Code). The discussion is based upon the Code, Treasury regulations, and administrative and judicial interpretations, each as of the date of this prospectus and all of which are subject to change, possibly retroactively, which could affect the continuing validity of this discussion. We have not sought and will not seek any ruling from the IRS regarding this offering. This summary does not discuss any aspects of U.S. estate or gift tax or foreign, state or local tax. It does not discuss the special treatment under U.S. federal income tax laws that could result if we invested in tax-exempt securities or certain other investment assets.
 
A “U.S. stockholder” generally is a beneficial owner of shares of our common stock who is for U.S. federal income tax purposes:
 
  •  A citizen or individual resident of the United States;
 
  •  A corporation or other entity treated as a corporation, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, created or organized in or under the laws of the United States or any political subdivision thereof;
 
  •  A trust if a court within the United States is asked to exercise primary supervision over the administration of the trust and one or more United States persons have the authority to control all substantive decisions of the trust; or
 
  •  An estate, the income of which is subject to U.S. federal income taxation regardless of its source.
 
A “Non-U.S. stockholder” generally is a beneficial owner of shares of our common stock who is for U.S. federal income tax purposes:
 
  •  A nonresident alien individual;
 
  •  A foreign corporation; or
 
  •  An estate or trust that in either case is not subject to U.S. federal income tax on a net income basis on income or gain from a note.
 
If a partnership (including an entity treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes) holds shares of our common stock, the tax treatment of a partner in the partnership will generally depend upon the status of the partner and the activities of the partnership. A prospective stockholder that is a partner of a partnership holding shares of our common stock should consult his, her or its tax advisers with respect to the purchase, ownership and disposition of shares of our common stock.
 
Tax matters are very complicated and the tax consequences to an investor of an investment in our shares will depend on the facts of his, her or its particular situation. We encourage investors to consult their own tax advisers regarding the specific consequences of such an investment, including tax reporting requirements, the applicability of federal, state, local and foreign tax laws, eligibility for the benefits of any applicable tax treaty and the effect of any possible changes in the tax laws.
 
Election to be Taxed as a RIC
 
As a business development company, we have elected to be treated, and intend to qualify annually, as a RIC under Subchapter M of the Code, beginning with our 2008 taxable year. As a RIC, we generally will not have to pay corporate-level U.S. federal income taxes on any income that we distribute to our stockholders as dividends. To continue to qualify as a RIC, we must, among other things, meet certain source-of-income and asset diversification


101


Table of Contents

requirements (as described below). In addition, to qualify for RIC tax treatment we must distribute to our stockholders, for each taxable year, at least 90% of our “investment company taxable income,” which is generally our ordinary income plus the excess of our realized net short-term capital gains over our realized net long-term capital losses (the “Annual Distribution Requirement”).
 
Taxation as a Regulated Investment Company
 
For any taxable year in which we:
 
  •  qualify as a RIC; and
 
  •  satisfy the Annual Distribution Requirement,
 
we generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax on the portion of our income we distribute (or are deemed to distribute) to stockholders. We will be subject to U.S. federal income tax at the regular corporate rates on any income or capital gains not distributed (or deemed distributed) to our stockholders.
 
We will be subject to a 4% nondeductible U.S. federal excise tax on certain undistributed income unless we distribute in a timely manner an amount at least equal to the sum of (1) 98% of our net ordinary income for each calendar year, (2) 98.2% of our capital gain net income for the one-year period ending October 31 in that calendar year and (3) any income recognized, but not distributed, in preceding years (the “Excise Tax Avoidance Requirement”). We generally will endeavor in each taxable year to make sufficient distributions to our stockholders to avoid any U.S. federal excise tax on our earnings.
 
In order to qualify as a RIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes, we must, among other things:
 
  •  continue to qualify as a business development company under the 1940 Act at all times during each taxable year;
 
  •  derive in each taxable year at least 90% of our gross income from dividends, interest, payments with respect to loans of certain securities, gains from the sale of stock or other securities, net income from certain “qualified publicly traded partnerships,” or other income derived with respect to our business of investing in such stock or securities (the “90% Income Test”); and
 
  •  diversify our holdings so that at the end of each quarter of the taxable year:
 
  •  at least 50% of the value of our assets consists of cash, cash equivalents, U.S. Government securities, securities of other RICs, and other securities if such other securities of any one issuer do not represent more than 5% of the value of our assets or more than 10% of the outstanding voting securities of the issuer; and
 
  •  no more than 25% of the value of our assets is invested in the securities, other than U.S. government securities or securities of other RICs, of one issuer, of two or more issuers that are controlled, as determined under applicable Code rules, by us and that are engaged in the same or similar or related trades or businesses or of certain “qualified publicly traded partnerships” (the “Diversification Tests”).
 
Qualified earnings may exclude such income as management fees received in connection with our SBIC or other potential outside managed funds and certain other fees.
 
Pursuant to a recent revenue procedure issued by the IRS, the IRS has indicated that it will treat distributions from certain publicly traded RICs (including BDCs) that are paid part in cash and part in stock as dividends that would satisfy the RIC’s annual distribution requirements and qualify for the dividends paid deduction for income tax purposes. In order to qualify for such treatment, the revenue procedure requires that at least 10% of the total distribution be paid in cash and that each shareholder have a right to elect to receive its entire distribution in cash. If the number of shareholders electing to receive cash would cause cash distributions in excess of 10%, then each shareholder electing to receive cash would receive a proportionate share of the cash to be distributed (although no shareholder electing to receive cash may receive less than 10% of such shareholder’s distribution in cash). This revenue procedure applies to distributions made with respect to taxable years ending prior to January 1, 2012. Taxable stockholders receiving such dividends will be required to include the full amount of the dividend as


102


Table of Contents

ordinary income (or as long-term capital gain to the extent such distribution is properly reported as a capital gain dividend) to the extent of our current and accumulated earnings and profits for United States federal income tax purposes. In situations where this revenue procedure is not applicable, the Internal Revenue Service has also issued private letter rulings on cash/stock dividends paid by RICs and real estate investment trusts using a 20% cash standard (instead of the 10% cash standard of the revenue procedure) if certain requirements are satisfied. As a result, a U.S. stockholder may be required to pay tax with respect to such dividends in excess of any cash received. If a U.S. stockholder sells the stock it receives as a dividend in order to pay this tax, the sales proceeds may be less than the amount included in income with respect to the dividend, depending on the market price of our stock at the time of the sale.
 
We may be required to recognize taxable income in circumstances in which we do not receive cash. For example, if we hold debt obligations that are treated under applicable tax rules as having original issue discount (such as debt instruments with PIK interest or, in certain cases, increasing interest rates or issued with warrants), we must include in income each year a portion of the original issue discount that accrues over the life of the obligation, regardless of whether cash representing such income is received by us in the same taxable year. We may also have to include in income other amounts that we have not yet received in cash, such as PIK interest, deferred loan origination fees that are paid after origination of the loan or are paid in non-cash compensation such as warrants or stock, or certain income with respect to equity investments in foreign corporations. Because any original issue discount or other amounts accrued will be included in our investment company taxable income for the year of accrual, we may be required to make a distribution to our stockholders in order to satisfy the Annual Distribution Requirement, even though we will not have received any corresponding cash amount.
 
Gain or loss realized by us from the sale or exchange of warrants acquired by us as well as any loss attributable to the lapse of such warrants generally will be treated as capital gain or loss. Such gain or loss generally will be long-term or short-term, depending on how long we held a particular warrant.
 
Although we do not presently expect to do so, we are authorized to borrow funds and to sell assets in order to satisfy distribution requirements. However, under the 1940 Act, we are not permitted to make distributions to our stockholders while our debt obligations and other senior securities are outstanding unless certain “asset coverage” tests are met. Moreover, our ability to dispose of assets to meet our distribution requirements may be limited by (1) the illiquid nature of our portfolio and/or (2) other requirements relating to our status as a RIC, including the Diversification Tests. If we dispose of assets in order to meet the Annual Distribution Requirement or the Excise Tax Avoidance Requirement, we may make such dispositions at times that, from an investment standpoint, are not advantageous. If we are prohibited from making distributions or are unable to obtain cash from other sources to make the distributions, we may fail to qualify as a RIC, which would result in us becoming subject to corporate-level federal income tax.
 
In addition, we will be partially dependent on our SBIC subsidiaries for cash distributions to enable us to meet the RIC distribution requirements. Our SBIC subsidiaries may be limited by the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, and SBA regulations governing SBICs, from making certain distributions to us that may be necessary to maintain our status as a RIC. We may have to request a waiver of the SBA’s restrictions for our SBIC subsidiary to make certain distributions to maintain our RIC status. We cannot assure you that the SBA will grant such waiver. If our SBIC subsidiaries are unable to obtain a waiver, compliance with the SBA regulations may cause us to fail to qualify as a RIC, which would result in us becoming subject to corporate-level federal income tax.
 
The remainder of this discussion assumes that we qualify as a RIC and have satisfied the Annual Distribution Requirement.
 
Any transactions in options, futures contracts, constructive sales, hedging, straddle, conversion or similar transactions, and forward contracts will be subject to special tax rules, the effect of which may be to accelerate income to us, defer losses, cause adjustments to the holding periods of our investments, convert long-term capital gains into short-term capital gains, convert short-term capital losses into long-term capital losses or have other tax consequences. These rules could affect the amount, timing and character of distributions to stockholders. We do not currently intend to engage in these types of transactions.


103


Table of Contents

A RIC is limited in its ability to deduct expenses in excess of its “investment company taxable income” (which is, generally, ordinary income plus net realized short-term capital gains in excess of net realized long-term capital losses). If our expenses in a given year exceed gross taxable income (e.g., as the result of large amounts of equity-based compensation), we would experience a net operating loss for that year. However, a RIC is not permitted to carry forward net operating losses to subsequent years. In addition, expenses can be used only to offset investment company taxable income, not net capital gain. Due to these limits on the deductibility of expenses, we may for tax purposes have aggregate taxable income for several years that we are required to distribute and that is taxable to our stockholders even if such income is greater than the aggregate net income we actually earned during those years. Such required distributions may be made from our cash assets or by liquidation of investments, if necessary. We may realize gains or losses from such liquidations. In the event we realize net capital gains from such transactions, you may receive a larger capital gain distribution than you would have received in the absence of such transactions.
 
Investment income received from sources within foreign countries, or capital gains earned by investing in securities of foreign issuers, may be subject to foreign income taxes withheld at the source. In this regard, withholding tax rates in countries with which the United States does not have a tax treaty are often as high as 35% or more. The United States has entered into tax treaties with many foreign countries that may entitle us to a reduced rate of tax or exemption from tax on this related income and gains. The effective rate of foreign tax cannot be determined at this time since the amount of our assets to be invested within various countries is not now known. We do not anticipate being eligible for the special election that allows a RIC to treat foreign income taxes paid by such RIC as paid by its shareholders.
 
If we acquire stock in certain foreign corporations that receive at least 75% of their annual gross income from passive sources (such as interest, dividends, rents, royalties or capital gain) or hold at least 50% of their total assets in investments producing such passive income (“passive foreign investment companies”), We could be subject to federal income tax and additional interest charges on “excess distributions” received from such companies or gain from the sale of stock in such companies, even if all income or gain actually received by us is timely distributed to our shareholders. We would not be able to pass through to our shareholders any credit or deduction for such a tax. Certain elections may, if available, ameliorate these adverse tax consequences, but any such election requires us to recognize taxable income or gain without the concurrent receipt of cash. We intend to limit and/or manage our holdings in passive foreign investment companies to minimize our tax liability.
 
Foreign exchange gains and losses realized by us in connection with certain transactions involving non-dollar debt securities, certain foreign currency futures contracts, foreign currency option contracts, foreign currency forward contracts, foreign currencies, or payables or receivables denominated in a foreign currency are subject to Code provisions that generally treat such gains and losses as ordinary income and losses and may affect the amount, timing and character of distributions to our stockholders. Any such transactions that are not directly related to our investment in securities (possibly including speculative currency positions or currency derivatives not used for hedging purposes) could, under future Treasury regulations, produce income not among the types of “qualifying income” from which a RIC must derive at least 90% of its annual gross income.
 
Taxation of U.S. Stockholders
 
Distributions by us generally are taxable to U.S. stockholders as ordinary income or capital gains. Distributions of our “investment company taxable income” (which is, generally, our net ordinary income plus realized net short-term capital gains in excess of realized net long-term capital losses) will be taxable as ordinary income to U.S. stockholders to the extent of our current or accumulated earnings and profits, whether paid in cash or reinvested in additional common stock. To the extent such distributions paid by us in taxable years beginning before January 1, 2013 to non-corporate stockholders (including individuals) are attributable to dividends from U.S. corporations and certain qualified foreign corporations, such distributions (“Qualifying Dividends”) may be eligible for a maximum tax rate of 15%, provided holding period and other requirements are met at both the stockholder and company levels. In this regard, it is anticipated that distributions paid by us will generally not be attributable to dividends and, therefore, generally will not qualify for the 15% maximum rate applicable to Qualifying Dividends. Distributions of our net capital gains (which are generally our realized net long-term capital gains in excess of realized net short-term capital losses) made in taxable years beginning before January 1, 2013 and properly reported by us as “capital gain dividends” in written statements furnished to our stockholders will be taxable to a U.S. stockholder as long-


104


Table of Contents

term capital gains that are currently taxable at a maximum rate of 15% in the case of individuals, trusts or estates, regardless of the U.S. stockholder’s holding period for his, her or its common stock and regardless of whether paid in cash or reinvested in additional common stock. Distributions in excess of our earnings and profits first will reduce a U.S. stockholder’s adjusted tax basis in such stockholder’s common stock and, after the adjusted basis is reduced to zero, will constitute capital gains to such U.S. stockholder.
 
We may retain some or all of our realized net long-term capital gains in excess of realized net short-term capital losses, but designate the retained net capital gain as a “deemed distribution.” In that case, among other consequences, we will pay tax on the retained amount, each U.S. stockholder will be required to include his, her or its share of the deemed distribution in income as if it had been actually distributed to the U.S. stockholder, and the U.S. stockholder will be entitled to claim a credit equal to his, her or its allocable share of the tax paid thereon by us. Because we expect to pay tax on any retained capital gains at our regular corporate tax rate, and because that rate is in excess of the maximum rate currently payable by individuals on long-term capital gains, the amount of tax that individual U.S. stockholders will be treated as having paid will exceed the tax they owe on the capital gain distribution and such excess generally may be refunded or claimed as a credit against the U.S. stockholder’s other U.S. federal income tax obligations or may be refunded to the extent it exceeds a stockholder’s liability for federal income tax. A stockholder that is not subject to federal income tax or otherwise required to file a federal income tax return would be required to file a federal income tax return on the appropriate form in order to claim a refund for the taxes we paid. The amount of the deemed distribution net of such tax will be added to the U.S. stockholder’s cost basis for his, her or its common stock. In order to utilize the deemed distribution approach, we must provide written notice to our stockholders prior to the expiration of 60 days after the close of the relevant taxable year. We cannot treat any of our investment company taxable income as a “deemed distribution.”
 
For purposes of determining (1) whether the Annual Distribution Requirement is satisfied for any year and (2) the amount of the deduction for ordinary income and capital gain dividends paid for that year, we may, under certain circumstances, elect to treat a dividend that is paid during the following taxable year as if it had been paid during the taxable year in question. If we make such an election, the U.S. stockholder will still be treated as receiving the dividend in the taxable year in which the distribution is made. However, any dividend declared by us in October, November or December of any calendar year, payable to stockholders of record on a specified date in such a month and actually paid during January of the following year, will be treated as if it had been received by our U.S. stockholders on December 31 of the year in which the dividend was declared.
 
If an investor purchases shares of our common stock shortly before the record date of a distribution, the price of the shares will include the value of the distribution and the investor will be subject to tax on the distribution even though economically it may represent a return of his, her or its investment.
 
A U.S. stockholder generally will recognize taxable gain or loss if the U.S. stockholder sells or otherwise disposes of his, her or its shares of our common stock. The amount of gain or loss will be measured by the difference between such U.S. stockholder’s adjusted tax basis in the common stock sold and the amount of the proceeds received in exchange. Any gain arising from such sale or disposition generally will be treated as long-term capital gain or loss if the U.S. stockholder has held his, her or its shares for more than one year. Otherwise, it will be classified as short-term capital gain or loss. However, any capital loss arising from the sale or disposition of shares of our common stock held for six months or less will be treated as long-term capital loss to the extent of the amount of capital gain dividends received, or undistributed capital gain deemed received, with respect to such shares. In addition, all or a portion of any loss recognized upon a disposition of shares of our common stock may be disallowed if other shares of our common stock are purchased (whether through reinvestment of distributions or otherwise) within 30 days before or after the disposition. In such a case, the basis of the newly purchased shares will be adjusted to reflect the disallowed loss.
 
In general, U.S. stockholders taxed at individual rates currently are subject to a maximum U.S. federal income tax rate of 15% on their net capital gain (i.e., the excess of realized net long-term capital gains over realized net short-term capital losses) recognized in taxable years beginning before January 1, 2013, including any long-term capital gain derived from an investment in our shares. Such rate is lower than the maximum rate on ordinary income currently payable by such U.S. stockholders. The maximum rate on long-term capital gains for U.S. stockholders taxed at individual rates is scheduled to return to 20% for tax years beginning after December 31, 2012. In addition,


105


Table of Contents

for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2012, individuals with income in excess of $200,000 ($250,000 in the case of married individuals filing jointly) and certain estates and trusts are subject to an additional 3.8% tax on their “net investment income,” which generally includes net income from interest, dividends, annuities, royalties, and rents, and net capital gains (other than certain amounts earned from trades or businesses). Corporate U.S. stockholders currently are subject to U.S. federal income tax on net capital gain at the maximum 35% rate also applied to ordinary income. Non-corporate U.S. stockholders with net capital losses for a year (i.e., capital losses in excess of capital gains) generally may deduct up to $3,000 of such losses against their ordinary income each year any net capital losses of a non-corporate U.S. stockholder in excess of $3,000 generally may be carried forward and used in subsequent years as provided in the Code. Corporate U.S. stockholders generally may not deduct any net capital losses for a year, but may carry back such losses for three years or carry forward such losses for five years.
 
We will send to each of our U.S. stockholders, as promptly as possible after the end of each calendar year, a notice reporting, on a per share and per distribution basis, the amounts includible in such U.S. stockholder’s taxable income for such year as ordinary income and as long-term capital gain. In addition, the federal tax status of each year’s distributions generally will be reported to the IRS (including the amount of dividends, if any, eligible for the 15% maximum rate). Dividends paid by us generally will not be eligible for the dividends-received deduction or the preferential tax rate applicable to Qualifying Dividends because our income generally will not consist of dividends. Distributions may also be subject to additional state, local and foreign taxes depending on a U.S. stockholder’s particular situation.
 
In some taxable years, we may be subject to the alternative minimum tax (“AMT”). If we have tax items that are treated differently for AMT purposes than for regular tax purposes, we may apportion those items between us and our stockholders, and this may affect our stockholder’s AMT liabilities. Although regulations explaining the precise method of apportionment have not yet been issued by the Internal Revenue Service, we may apportion these items in the same proportion that dividends paid to each stockholder bear to our taxable income (determined without regard to the dividends paid deduction), unless we determine that a different method for a particular item is warranted under the circumstances. You should consult your own tax advisor to determine how an investment in our stock could affect your AMT liability.
 
We may be required to withhold U.S. federal income tax (“backup withholding”) from all distributions to any U.S. stockholder (other than a stockholder that otherwise qualifies for an exemption) (1) who fails to furnish us with a correct taxpayer identification number or a certificate that such stockholder is exempt from backup withholding or (2) with respect to whom the IRS notifies us that such stockholder has failed to properly report certain interest and dividend income to the IRS and to respond to notices to that effect. An individual’s taxpayer identification number is his or her social security number. Any amount withheld under backup withholding is allowed as a credit against the U.S. stockholder’s federal income tax liability, provided that proper information is provided to the IRS.
 
U.S. stockholders that hold their common stock through foreign accounts or intermediaries will be subject to U.S. withholding tax at a rate of 30% on dividends and proceeds of sale of our common stock paid after December 31, 2012 if certain disclosure requirements related to U.S. accounts are not satisfied.
 
Dividend Reinvestment Plan  We have adopted a dividend reinvestment plan through which all dividend distributions are paid to our stockholders in the form of additional shares of our common stock, unless a stockholder elects to receive cash in accordance with the terms of the plan. See “Dividend Reinvestment Plan”. Any distributions made to a U.S. stockholder that are reinvested under the plan will nevertheless remain taxable to the U.S. stockholder. The U.S. stockholder will have an adjusted tax basis in the additional shares of our common stock purchased through the plan equal to the amount of the reinvested distribution. The additional shares will have a new holding period commencing on the day following the day on which the shares are credited to the U.S. stockholder’s account.
 
Taxation of Non-U.S. Stockholders
 
Whether an investment in the shares is appropriate for a Non-U.S. stockholder will depend upon that person’s particular circumstances. An investment in the shares by a Non-U.S. stockholder may have adverse tax consequences. Non-U.S. stockholders should consult their tax advisers before investing in our common stock.


106


Table of Contents

Distributions of our “investment company taxable income” to Non-U.S. stockholders (including interest income and realized net short-term capital gains in excess of realized long-term capital losses, which generally would be free of withholding if paid to Non-U.S. stockholders directly) will be subject to withholding of federal tax at a 30% rate (or lower rate provided by an applicable treaty) to the extent of our current and accumulated earnings and profits unless an applicable exception applies. If the distributions are effectively connected with a U.S. trade or business of the Non-U.S. stockholder, we will not be required to withhold federal tax if the Non-U.S. stockholder complies with applicable certification and disclosure requirements, although the distributions will be subject to U.S. federal income tax at the rates applicable to U.S. persons. (Special certification requirements apply to a Non-U.S. stockholder that is a foreign partnership or a foreign trust, and such entities are urged to consult their own tax advisers.)
 
However, for taxable years beginning before January 1, 2012, no withholding will be required with respect to certain distributions if (i) the distributions are properly reported to our stockholders as “interest-related dividends” or “short-term capital gain dividends” in written statements to our stockholders, (ii) the distributions are derived from sources specified in the Code for such dividends and (iii) certain other requirements are satisfied. Currently, we do not anticipate that any significant amount of our distributions will be reported as eligible for this proposed exemption from withholding. No assurance can be provided that this exemption will be extended for tax years beginning after December 31, 2011. Actual or deemed distributions of our net capital gains to a Non-U.S. stockholder, and gains realized by a Non-U.S. stockholder upon the sale of our common stock, will not be subject to federal withholding tax and generally will not be subject to federal income tax unless the distributions or gains, as the case may be, are effectively connected with a U.S. trade or business of the Non-U.S. stockholder.
 
The tax consequences to Non-U.S. stockholders entitled to claim the benefits of an applicable tax treaty or that are individuals that are present in the United States for 183 days or more during a taxable year may be different from those described herein. Non-U.S. stockholders are urged to consult their tax advisers with respect to the procedure for claiming the benefit of a lower treaty rate and the applicability of foreign taxes.
 
If we distribute our net capital gains in the form of deemed rather than actual distributions, a Non-U.S. stockholder will be entitled to a U.S. federal income tax credit or tax refund equal to the stockholder’s allocable share of the tax we pay on the capital gains deemed to have been distributed. In order to obtain the refund, the Non-U.S. stockholder must obtain a U.S. taxpayer identification number and file a U.S. federal income tax return even if the Non-U.S. stockholder would not otherwise be required to obtain a U.S. taxpayer identification number or file a U.S. federal income tax return. For a corporate Non-U.S. stockholder, distributions (both actual and deemed), and gains realized upon the sale of our common stock that are effectively connected to a U.S. trade or business may, under certain circumstances, be subject to an additional “branch profits tax” at a 30% rate (or at a lower rate if provided for by an applicable treaty). Accordingly, investment in the shares may not be appropriate for a Non-U.S. stockholder.
 
A Non-U.S. stockholder who is a non-resident alien individual, and who is otherwise subject to withholding of federal tax, may be subject to information reporting and backup withholding of U.S. federal income tax on dividends unless the Non-U.S. stockholder provides us or the dividend paying agent with an IRS Form W-8BEN (or an acceptable substitute form) or otherwise meets documentary evidence requirements for establishing that it is a Non-U.S. stockholder or otherwise establishes an exemption from backup withholding.
 
Recently enacted legislation that becomes effective after December 31, 2012, generally imposes a 30% withholding tax on payments of certain types of income to foreign financial institutions that fail to enter into an agreement with the U.S. Treasury to report certain required information with respect to accounts held by U.S. persons (or held by foreign entities that have U.S. persons as substantial owners). The types of income subject to the tax include U.S. source interest and dividends and the gross proceeds from the sale of any property that could produce U.S.-source interest or dividends. The information required to be reported includes the identity and taxpayer identification number of each account holder that is a U.S. person and transaction activity within the holder’s account. In addition, subject to certain exceptions, this legislation also imposes a 30% withholding on payments to foreign entities that are not financial institutions unless the foreign entity certifies that it does not have a greater than 10% U.S. owner or provides the withholding agent with identifying information on each greater than 10% U.S. owner. When these provisions become effective, depending on the status of a Non-U.S. Holder and the status of the intermediaries through which they hold their shares, Non-U.S. Holders could be subject to this 30%


107


Table of Contents

withholding tax with respect to distributions on their shares and proceeds from the sale of their shares. Under certain circumstances, a Non-U.S. Holder might be eligible for refunds or credits of such taxes.
 
Non-U.S. persons should consult their own tax advisers with respect to the U.S. federal income tax and withholding tax, and state, local and foreign tax consequences of an investment in the shares.
 
Failure to Qualify as a Regulated Investment Company
 
If we fail to satisfy the 90% Income Test or the Diversification Tests for any taxable year, we may nevertheless continue to qualify as a RIC for such year if certain relief provisions are applicable (which may, among other things, require us to pay certain corporate-level federal taxes or to dispose of certain assets).
 
If we were unable to qualify for treatment as a RIC and the foregoing relief provisions are not applicable, we would be subject to tax on all of our taxable income at regular corporate rates, regardless of whether we make any distributions to our stockholders. Distributions would not be required, and any distributions made in taxable years beginning on or before December 31, 2012 would be taxable to our stockholders as ordinary dividend income that, subject to certain limitations, may be eligible for the 15% maximum rate to the extent of our current and accumulated earnings and profits provided certain holding period and other requirements were met. Subject to certain limitations under the Code, corporate distributees would be eligible for the dividends-received deduction. Distributions in excess of our current and accumulated earnings and profits would be treated first as a return of capital to the extent of the stockholder’s tax basis, and any remaining distributions would be treated as a capital gain. To requalify as a RIC in a subsequent taxable year, we would be required to satisfy the RIC qualification requirements for that year and dispose of any earnings and profits from any year in which we failed to qualify as a RIC. Subject to a limited exception applicable to RICs that qualified as such under Subchapter M of the Code for at least one year prior to disqualification and that requalify as a RIC no later than the second year following the nonqualifying year, we could be subject to tax on any unrealized net built-in gains in the assets held by us during the period in which we failed to qualify as a RIC that are recognized within the subsequent 10 years, unless we made a special election to pay corporate-level tax on such built-in gain at the time of our requalification as a RIC.


108


Table of Contents

 
REGULATION
 
Business Development Company Regulations
 
We have elected to be regulated as a business development company under the 1940 Act. The 1940 Act contains prohibitions and restrictions relating to transactions between business development companies and their affiliates, principal underwriters and affiliates of those affiliates or underwriters. The 1940 Act requires that a majority of the directors be persons other than “interested persons,” as that term is defined in the 1940 Act. In addition, the 1940 Act provides that we may not change the nature of our business so as to cease to be, or to withdraw our election as, a business development company unless approved by a majority of our outstanding voting securities.
 
The 1940 Act defines “a majority of the outstanding voting securities” as the lesser of (i) 67% or more of the voting securities present at a meeting if the holders of more than 50% of our outstanding voting securities are present or represented by proxy or (ii) 50% of our voting securities.
 
As a business development company, we will not generally be permitted to invest in any portfolio company in which our investment adviser or any of its affiliates currently have an investment or to make any co-investments with our investment adviser or its affiliates without an exemptive order from the SEC. We currently do not intend to apply for an exemptive order that would permit us to co-invest with vehicles managed by our investment adviser or its affiliates.
 
Qualifying Assets
 
Under the 1940 Act, a business development company may not acquire any asset other than assets of the type listed in Section 55(a) of the 1940 Act, which are referred to as qualifying assets, unless, at the time the acquisition is made, qualifying assets represent at least 70% of the company’s total assets. The principal categories of qualifying assets relevant to our business are any of the following:
 
(1) Securities purchased in transactions not involving any public offering from the issuer of such securities, which issuer (subject to certain limited exceptions) is an eligible portfolio company, or from any person who is, or has been during the preceding 13 months, an affiliated person of an eligible portfolio company, or from any other person, subject to such rules as may be prescribed by the SEC. An eligible portfolio company is defined in the 1940 Act as any issuer which:
 
(a) is organized under the laws of, and has its principal place of business in, the United States;
 
(b) is not an investment company (other than a small business investment company wholly owned by the business development company) or a company that would be an investment company but for certain exclusions under the 1940 Act; and
 
(c) satisfies any of the following:
 
(i) does not have any class of securities that is traded on a national securities exchange;
 
(ii) has a class of securities listed on a national securities exchange, but has an aggregate market value of outstanding voting and non-voting common equity of less than $250 million;
 
(iii) is controlled by a business development company or a group of companies including a business development company and the business development company has an affiliated person who is a director of the eligible portfolio company; or
 
(iv) is a small and solvent company having total assets of not more than $4 million and capital and surplus of not less than $2 million.
 
(2) Securities of any eligible portfolio company that we control.
 
(3) Securities purchased in a private transaction from a U.S. issuer that is not an investment company or from an affiliated person of the issuer, or in transactions incident thereto, if the issuer is in bankruptcy and subject to reorganization or if the issuer, immediately prior to the purchase of its securities was unable to meet its obligations as they came due without material assistance other than conventional lending or financing arrangements.


109


Table of Contents

(4) Securities of an eligible portfolio company purchased from any person in a private transaction if there is no ready market for such securities and we already own 60% of the outstanding equity of the eligible portfolio company.
 
(5) Securities received in exchange for or distributed on or with respect to securities described in (1) through (4) above, or pursuant to the exercise of warrants or rights relating to such securities.
 
(6) Cash, cash equivalents, U.S. government securities or high-quality debt securities maturing in one year or less from the time of investment.
 
In addition, a business development company must be operated for the purpose of making investments in the types of securities described in (1), (2) or (3) above.
 
Managerial Assistance to Portfolio Companies
 
In order to count portfolio securities as qualifying assets for the purpose of the 70% test, we must either control the issuer of the securities or must offer to make available to the issuer of the securities (other than small and solvent companies described above) significant managerial assistance; except that, where we purchase such securities in conjunction with one or more other persons acting together, one of the other persons in the group may make available such managerial assistance. Making available managerial assistance means, among other things, any arrangement whereby the business development company, through its directors, officers or employees, offers to provide, and, if accepted, does so provide, significant guidance and counsel concerning the management, operations or business objectives and policies of a portfolio company.
 
Temporary Investments
 
Pending investment in other types of “qualifying assets,” as described above, our investments may consist of cash, cash equivalents, U.S. government securities or high-quality debt securities maturing in one year or less from the time of investment, which we refer to, collectively, as temporary investments, so that 70% of our assets are qualifying assets. Typically, we will invest in U.S. Treasury bills or in repurchase agreements, provided that such agreements are fully collateralized by cash or securities issued by the U.S. government or its agencies. A repurchase agreement (which is substantially similar to a secured loan) involves the purchase by an investor, such as us, of a specified security and the simultaneous agreement by the seller to repurchase it at an agreed-upon future date and at a price that is greater than the purchase price by an amount that reflects an agreed-upon interest rate. There is no percentage restriction on the proportion of our assets that may be invested in such repurchase agreements. However, if more than 25% of our total assets constitute repurchase agreements from a single counterparty, we would not meet the diversification tests in order to qualify as a RIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Thus, we do not intend to enter into repurchase agreements with a single counterparty in excess of this limit. Our investment adviser will monitor the creditworthiness of the counterparties with which we enter into repurchase agreement transactions.
 
Senior Securities
 
We are permitted, under specified conditions, to issue multiple classes of debt and one class of stock senior to our common stock if our asset coverage, as defined in the 1940 Act, is at least equal to 200% immediately after each such issuance. In addition, while any senior securities remain outstanding, we may be prohibited from making distribution to our stockholders or repurchasing such securities or shares unless we meet the applicable asset coverage ratios at the time of the distribution or repurchase. We may also borrow amounts up to 5% of the value of our total assets for temporary or emergency purposes without regard to asset coverage. For a discussion of the risks associated with leverage, see “Risk Factors — Risks Relating to Our Business and Structure — Regulations governing our operation as a business development company and RIC affect our ability to raise, and the way in which we raise, additional capital or borrow for investment purposes, which may have a negative effect on our growth” and “— Because we borrow money, the potential for loss on amounts invested in us will be magnified and may increase the risk of investing in us.”


110


Table of Contents

Common Stock
 
We are not generally able to issue and sell our common stock at a price below net asset value per share. We may, however, sell our common stock, warrants, options or rights to acquire our common stock, at a price below the current net asset value of the common stock if our Board of Directors determines that such sale is in our best interests and that of our stockholders, and our stockholders approve such sale. In any such case, the price at which our securities are to be issued and sold may not be less than a price which, in the determination of our Board of Directors, closely approximates the market value of such securities (less any distributing commission or discount). We may also make rights offerings to our stockholders at prices per share less than the net asset value per share, subject to applicable requirements of the 1940 Act. See “Risk Factors — Risks Relating to Our Business and Structure — Regulations governing our operation as a business development company affect our ability to raise, and the way in which we raise, additional capital or borrow for investment purposes, which may have a negative effect on our growth.”
 
Code of Ethics
 
We have adopted a code of ethics pursuant to Rule 17j-1 under the 1940 Act and we have also approved the investment adviser’s code of ethics that was adopted by it under Rule 17j-1 under the 1940 Act and Rule 204A-1 of the Advisers Act. These codes establish procedures for personal investments and restrict certain personal securities transactions. Personnel subject to the code may invest in securities for their personal investment accounts, including securities that may be purchased or held by us, so long as such investments are made in accordance with the code’s requirements. You may also read and copy the codes of ethics at the SEC’s Public Reference Room located at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549. You may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. In addition, the codes of ethics are available on the EDGAR Database on the SEC’s Internet site at http://www.sec.gov.
 
Compliance Policies and Procedures
 
We and our investment adviser have adopted and implemented written policies and procedures reasonably designed to prevent violation of the federal securities laws and are required to review these compliance policies and procedures annually for their adequacy and the effectiveness of their implementation. Our chief compliance officer is responsible for administering these policies and procedures.
 
Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures
 
We have delegated our proxy voting responsibility to our investment adviser. The proxy voting policies and procedures of our investment adviser are set forth below. (The guidelines are reviewed periodically by our investment adviser and our non-interested directors, and, accordingly, are subject to change).
 
Introduction
 
As an investment adviser registered under the Investment Advisers Act, our investment adviser has a fiduciary duty to act solely in the best interests of its clients. As part of this duty, it recognizes that it must vote client securities in a timely manner free of conflicts of interest and in the best interests of its clients.
 
These policies and procedures for voting proxies for the investment advisory clients of our investment adviser are intended to comply with Section 206 of, and Rule 206(4)-6 under, the Advisers Act.
 
Proxy policies
 
Our investment adviser will vote proxies relating to our securities in the best interest of our stockholders. It will review on a case-by-case basis each proposal submitted for a stockholder vote to determine its impact on the portfolio securities held by us. Although our investment adviser will generally vote against proposals that may have a negative impact on our portfolio securities, it may vote for such a proposal if there exists compelling long-term reasons to do so.
 
The proxy voting decisions of our investment adviser are made by the senior officers who are responsible for monitoring each of our investments. To ensure that its vote is not the product of a conflict of interest, it will require that: (a) anyone involved in the decision making process disclose to its chief compliance officer any potential conflict that he or she is aware of and any contact that he or she has had with any interested party regarding a proxy


111


Table of Contents

vote; and (b) employees involved in the decision making process or vote administration are prohibited from revealing how our investment adviser intends to vote on a proposal in order to reduce any attempted influence from interested parties.
 
Proxy voting records
 
You may obtain information, without charge, regarding how we voted proxies with respect to our portfolio securities by making a written request for proxy voting information to: Chief Compliance Officer, 10 Bank Street, 12th Floor, White Plains, NY 10606.
 
Other
 
We will be subject to periodic examination by the SEC for compliance with the 1940 Act.
 
We are required to provide and maintain a bond issued by a reputable fidelity insurance company to protect us against larceny and embezzlement. Furthermore, as a business development company, we are prohibited from protecting any director or officer against any liability to us or our stockholders arising from willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence or reckless disregard of the duties involved in the conduct of such person’s office.
 
Securities Exchange Act and Sarbanes-Oxley Act Compliance
 
We are subject to the reporting and disclosure requirements of the Exchange Act, including the filing of quarterly, annual and current reports, proxy statements and other required items. In addition, we are subject to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which imposes a wide variety of regulatory requirements on publicly-held companies and their insiders. For example:
 
  •  pursuant to Rule 13a-14 of the Exchange Act, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer are required to certify the accuracy of the financial statements contained in our periodic reports;
 
  •  pursuant to Item 307 of Regulation S-K, our periodic reports are required to disclose our conclusions about the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures; and
 
  •  pursuant to Rule 13a-15 of the Exchange Act, our management will be required to prepare a report regarding its assessment of our internal control over financial reporting. Our independent registered public accounting firm will be required to audit our internal control over financial reporting.
 
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires us to review our current policies and procedures to determine whether we comply with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the regulations promulgated thereunder. We intend to monitor our compliance with all regulations that are adopted under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and will take actions necessary to ensure that we are in compliance therewith.
 
Small Business Investment Company Regulations
 
In August 2009, we formed Fifth Street Mezzanine Partners IV, L.P. In February 2010, Fifth Street Mezzanine Partners IV, L.P. received final approval to be licensed by the United States Small Business Administration, or SBA, as a small business investment company, or SBIC.
 
The SBIC license allows our SBIC subsidiary to obtain leverage by issuing SBA-guaranteed debentures, subject to the issuance of a capital commitment by the SBA and other customary procedures. SBA-guaranteed debentures are non-recourse, interest only debentures with interest payable semi-annually and have a ten year maturity. The principal amount of SBA-guaranteed debentures is not required to be paid prior to maturity but may be prepaid at any time without penalty. The interest rate of SBA-guaranteed debentures is fixed at the time of issuance at a market-driven spread over U.S. Treasury Notes with 10-year maturities.
 
SBICs are designed to stimulate the flow of private equity capital to eligible small businesses. Under SBA regulations, SBICs may make loans to eligible small businesses and invest in the equity securities of small businesses. Under present SBA regulations, eligible small businesses include businesses that have a tangible net worth not exceeding $18 million and have average annual fully taxed net income not exceeding $6 million for the


112


Table of Contents

two most recent fiscal years. In addition, an SBIC must devote 25% of its investment activity to “smaller” concerns as defined by the SBA. A smaller concern is one that has a tangible net worth not exceeding $6 million and has average annual fully taxed net income not exceeding $2 million for the two most recent fiscal years. SBA regulations also provide alternative size standard criteria to determine eligibility, which depend on the industry in which the business is engaged and are based on such factors as the number of employees and gross sales. According to SBA regulations, SBICs may make long-term loans to small businesses, invest in the equity securities of such businesses and provide them with consulting and advisory services.
 
SBA regulations currently limit the amount that our SBIC subsidiary may borrow up to a maximum of $150 million when it has at least $75 million in regulatory capital, receives a capital commitment from the SBA and has been through an examination by the SBA subsequent to licensing. As of December 31, 2010, our SBIC subsidiary had $75 million in regulatory capital and the SBA had issued a capital commitment to our SBIC subsidiary in the amount of $150 million.
 
The SBA restricts the ability of SBICs to repurchase their capital stock. SBA regulations also include restrictions on a “change of control” or transfer of an SBIC and require that SBICs invest idle funds in accordance with SBA regulations. In addition, our SBIC subsidiary may also be limited in its ability to make distributions to us if it does not have sufficient capital, in accordance with SBA regulations.
 
Our SBIC subsidiary is subject to regulation and oversight by the SBA, including requirements with respect to maintaining certain minimum financial ratios and other covenants. Receipt of an SBIC license does not assure that our SBIC subsidiary will receive SBA guaranteed debenture funding, which is dependent upon our SBIC subsidiary continuing to be in compliance with SBA regulations and policies. The SBA, as a creditor, will have a superior claim to our SBIC subsidiary’s assets over our stockholders in the event we liquidate our SBIC subsidiary or the SBA exercises its remedies under the SBA-guaranteed debentures issued by our SBIC subsidiary upon an event of default.
 
The New York Stock Exchange Corporate Governance Regulations
 
The New York Stock Exchange has adopted corporate governance regulations that listed companies must comply with. We are in compliance with such corporate governance listing standards applicable to business development companies.


113


Table of Contents

 
PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION
 
We may sell our common stock through underwriters or dealers, “at the market” to or through a market maker or into an existing trading market or otherwise, directly to one or more purchasers or through agents or through a combination of any such methods of sale. Any underwriter or agent involved in the offer and sale of our common stock will also be named in the applicable prospectus supplement.
 
The distribution of our common stock may be effected from time to time in one or more transactions at a fixed price or prices, which may be changed, at prevailing market prices at the time of sale, at prices related to such prevailing market prices, or at negotiated prices, provided, however, that the offering price per share of our common stock, less any underwriting commissions and discounts or agency fees, must equal or exceed the net asset value per share of our common stock.
 
In connection with the sale of our common stock, underwriters or agents may receive compensation from us or from purchasers of our common stock, for whom they may act as agents, in the form of discounts, concessions or commissions.
 
Underwriters may sell our common stock to or through dealers and such dealers may receive compensation in the form of discounts, concessions or commissions from the underwriters and/or commissions from the purchasers for whom they may act as agents. Underwriters, dealers and agents that participate in the distribution of our common stock may be deemed to be underwriters under the Securities Act, and any discounts and commissions they receive from us and any profit realized by them on the resale of our common stock may be deemed to be underwriting discounts and commissions under the Securities Act. Any such underwriter or agent will be identified and any such compensation received from us will be described in the applicable prospectus supplement.
 
We may enter into derivative transactions with third parties, or sell securities not covered by this prospectus to third parties in privately negotiated transactions. If the applicable prospectus supplement indicates, in connection with those derivatives, the third parties may sell common stock covered by this prospectus and the applicable prospectus supplement, including in short sale transactions. If so, the third party may use securities pledged by us or borrowed from us or others to settle those sales or to close out any related open borrowings of stock, and may use securities received from us in settlement of those derivatives to close out any related open borrowings of stock. The third parties in such sale transactions will be underwriters and, if not identified in this prospectus, will be identified in the applicable prospectus supplement (or a post-effective amendment).
 
Any of our common stock sold pursuant to a prospectus supplement will be listed on the New York Stock Exchange, or another exchange on which our common stock is traded.
 
Under agreements into which we may enter, underwriters, dealers and agents who participate in the distribution of our common stock may be entitled to indemnification by us against certain liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act. Underwriters, dealers and agents may engage in transactions with, or perform services for, us in the ordinary course of business.
 
If so indicated in the applicable prospectus supplement, we will authorize underwriters or other persons acting as our agents to solicit offers by certain institutions to purchase our common stock from us pursuant to contracts providing for payment and delivery on a future date. Institutions with which such contracts may be made include commercial and savings banks, insurance companies, pension funds, investment companies, educational and charitable institutions and others, but in all cases such institutions must be approved by us. The obligations of any purchaser under any such contract will be subject to the condition that the purchase of our common stock shall not at the time of delivery be prohibited under the laws of the jurisdiction to which such purchaser is subject. The underwriters and such other agents will not have any responsibility in respect of the validity or performance of such contracts. Such contracts will be subject only to those conditions set forth in the prospectus supplement, and the prospectus supplement will set forth the commission payable for solicitation of such contracts.
 
In order to comply with the securities laws of certain states, if applicable, our common stock offered hereby will be sold in such jurisdictions only through registered or licensed brokers or dealers. In addition, in certain states, our common stock may not be sold unless it has been registered or qualified for sale in the applicable state or an exemption from the registration or qualification requirement is available and is complied with.
 
The maximum commission or discount to be received by any member of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. will not be greater than 10% for the sale of any securities being registered.


114


Table of Contents

 
CUSTODIAN, TRANSFER AND DISTRIBUTION PAYING AGENT AND REGISTRAR
 
Our portfolio securities are held under a custody agreement by U.S. Bank National Association. The address of the custodian is: U.S. Bank National Association, 214 N Tryon Street, 27th Floor, Charlotte, NC 28202. American Stock Transfer & Trust Company acts as our transfer agent, distribution paying agent and registrar for our common stock. The principal business address of our transfer agent is 59 Maiden Lane, New York, NY 10038, telephone number: (212) 936-5100.
 
BROKERAGE ALLOCATION AND OTHER PRACTICES
 
Since we intend to generally acquire and dispose of our investments in privately negotiated transactions, we expect to infrequently use brokers in the normal course of our business. Subject to policies established by our Board of Directors, our investment adviser is primarily responsible for the execution of the publicly-traded securities portion of our portfolio transactions and the allocation of brokerage commissions. Our investment adviser does not execute transactions through any particular broker or dealer, but seeks to obtain the best net results for us, taking into account such factors as price (including the applicable brokerage commission or dealer spread), size of order, difficulty of execution, and operational facilities of the firm and the firm’s risk and skill in positioning blocks of securities. While our investment adviser will generally seek reasonably competitive trade execution costs, we will not necessarily pay the lowest spread or commission available. Subject to applicable legal requirements, our investment adviser may select a broker based partly upon brokerage or research services provided to our investment adviser and us and any other clients. In return for such services, we may pay a higher commission than other brokers would charge if our investment adviser determines in good faith that such commission is reasonable in relation to the services provided.
 
LEGAL MATTERS
 
The validity of the shares of common stock offered by this prospectus and certain other legal matters will be passed upon for us by Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP, Washington, D.C. Certain legal matters will be passed upon for the underwriters, if any, by the counsel named in the prospectus supplement, if any.
 
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
The consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule as of September 30, 2010 and for the year ended September 30, 2010, included in this prospectus, have been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report appearing herein.
 
The consolidated financial statements as of September 30, 2009 and for the years ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, and the financial statement schedule for the year ended September 30, 2009, included in this registration statement and prospectus, have been audited by Grant Thornton LLP, our former independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report appearing herein.
 
CHANGE IN INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
On February 11, 2010, we dismissed Grant Thornton LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm. During the fiscal years ended September 30, 2008 and 2009 and through February 11, 2010, there were no disagreements between us and Grant Thornton LLP with respect to any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements, if not resolved to the satisfaction of Grant Thornton LLP, would have caused it to make reference to the subject matter of such disagreements in its reports on the financial statements for such years.
 
On February 11, 2010, we engaged PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our new independent registered public accounting firm to audit our consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2010.
 


115


Table of Contents

AVAILABLE INFORMATION
 
We have filed with the SEC a registration statement on Form N-2, together with all amendments and related exhibits, under the Securities Act, with respect to our shares of common stock offered by this prospectus or any prospectus supplement. The registration statement contains additional information about us and our shares of common stock being offered by this prospectus or any prospectus supplement.
 
We file with or submit to the SEC annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information meeting the informational requirements of the Exchange Act. You may inspect and copy these reports, proxy statements and other information, as well as the registration statement and related exhibits and schedules, at the Public Reference Room of the SEC at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549. You may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information filed electronically by us with the SEC, which are available on the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov. Copies of these reports, proxy and information statements and other information may be obtained, after paying a duplicating fee, by electronic request at the following e-mail address: publicinfo@sec.gov, or by writing the SEC’s Public Reference Section, 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549.
 
PRIVACY NOTICE
 
We are committed to protecting your privacy. This privacy notice explains the privacy policies of Fifth Street and its affiliated companies. This notice supersedes any other privacy notice you may have received from Fifth Street.
 
We will safeguard, according to strict standards of security and confidentiality, all information we receive about you. The only information we collect from you is your name, address, number of shares you hold and your social security number. This information is used only so that we can send you annual reports and other information about us, and send you proxy statements or other information required by law.
 
We do not share this information with any non-affiliated third party except as described below.
 
  •  Authorized Employees of Our Investment Adviser.  It is our policy that only authorized employees of our investment adviser who need to know your personal information will have access to it.
 
  •  Service Providers.  We may disclose your personal information to companies that provide services on our behalf, such as recordkeeping, processing your trades, and mailing you information. These companies are required to protect your information and use it solely for the purpose for which they received it.
 
  •  Courts and Government Officials.  If required by law, we may disclose your personal information in accordance with a court order or at the request of government regulators. Only that information required by law, subpoena, or court order will be disclosed.


116


 

 
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
         
    Page
 
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
       
    F-2  
    F-3  
    F-4  
    F-5  
    F-6  
    F-18  
       
AUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
       
    F-46  
    F-48  
    F-49  
    F-50  
    F-51  
    F-52  
    F-61  


F-1


Table of Contents

Fifth Street Finance Corp.
 
Consolidated Statements of Assets and Liabilities
(unaudited)
 
                 
    December 31,
    September 30,
 
    2010     2010  
 
ASSETS
Investments at fair value:
               
Control investments (cost 12/31/10: $9,681,508; cost 9/30/10: $12,195,029)
  $ 9,088,988     $ 3,700,000  
Affiliate investments (cost 12/31/10: $50,136,804; cost 9/30/10: $50,133,521)
    45,645,034       47,222,059  
Non-control/Non-affiliate investments (cost 12/31/10: $695,146,171; cost 9/30/10: $530,168,045)
    687,661,313       512,899,257  
                 
Total investments at fair value (cost 12/31/10: $754,964,483; cost 9/30/10: $592,496,595)
    742,395,335       563,821,316  
Cash and cash equivalents
    43,020,557       76,765,254  
Interest and fees receivable
    4,663,901       3,813,757  
Due from portfolio company
    151,962       103,426  
Deferred financing costs
    7,026,645       5,465,964  
Collateral posted to bank and other assets
    1,517,868       1,956,013  
                 
Total Assets
  $ 798,776,268     $ 651,925,730  
                 
 
LIABILITIES AND NET ASSETS
Liabilities:
               
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities
  $ 708,382     $ 1,322,282  
Base management fee payable
    3,778,779       2,875,802  
Incentive fee payable
    3,513,901       2,859,139  
Due to FSC, Inc. 
    1,261,541       1,083,038  
Interest payable
    1,147,642       282,640  
Payments received in advance from portfolio companies
    1,146,210       1,330,724  
Loans payable
    89,000,000        
SBA debentures payable
    123,300,000       73,000,000  
                 
Total Liabilities
    223,856,455       82,753,625  
                 
Net Assets:
               
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 150,000,000 shares authorized, 55,059,057 and 54,550,290 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2010 and September 30, 2010
    550,591       545,503  
Additional paid-in-capital
    625,519,180       619,759,984  
Net unrealized depreciation on investments and interest rate swap
    (12,606,190 )     (29,448,713 )
Net realized loss on investments
    (46,541,180 )     (33,090,961 )
Accumulated undistributed net investment income
    7,997,412       11,406,292  
                 
Total Net Assets (equivalent to $10.44 and $10.43 per common share at December 31, 2010 and September 30, 2010) (Note 12)
    574,919,813       569,172,105  
                 
Total Liabilities and Net Assets
  $ 798,776,268     $ 651,925,730  
                 
 
See notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


F-2


Table of Contents

Fifth Street Finance Corp.
 
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(unaudited)
 
                 
    Three Months
    Three Months
 
    Ended
    Ended
 
    December 31,
    December 31,
 
    2010     2009  
 
Interest income:
               
Control investments
  $ 969     $ 224,746  
Affiliate investments
    1,162,516       2,259,501  
Non-control/Non-affiliate investments
    16,489,184       7,673,326  
Interest on cash and cash equivalents
    9,136       195,662  
                 
Total interest income
    17,661,805       10,353,235  
                 
PIK interest income:
               
Control investments
    33,333        
Affiliate investments
    281,800       331,616  
Non-control/Non-affiliate investments
    2,828,555       1,630,158  
                 
Total PIK interest income
    3,143,688       1,961,774  
                 
Fee income:
               
Control investments
    126,486        
Affiliate investments
    133,554       253,777  
Non-control/Non-affiliate investments
    4,267,216       661,364  
                 
Total fee income
    4,527,256       915,141  
                 
Dividend and other income:
               
Control investments
           
Affiliate investments
           
Non-control/Non-affiliate investments
    2,434       11,333  
                 
Total dividend and other income
    2,434       11,333  
                 
Total Investment Income
    25,335,183       13,241,483  
                 
Expenses:
               
Base management fee
    3,778,779       2,267,003  
Incentive fee
    3,513,901       2,087,264  
Professional fees
    690,489       301,605  
Board of Directors fees
    49,500       38,000  
Interest expense
    1,938,710       91,179  
Administrator expense
    354,169       251,818  
General and administrative expenses
    954,033       582,623  
                 
Total expenses
    11,279,581       5,619,492  
Base management fee waived
          (727,067 )
                 
Net expenses
    11,279,581       4,892,425  
                 
Net Investment Income
    14,055,602       8,349,058  
Unrealized appreciation on interest rate swap
    736,390        
                 
Unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments:
               
Control investments
    8,070,596       1,993,222  
Affiliate investments
    (1,580,308 )     399,934  
Non-control/Non-affiliate investments
    9,615,845       (1,393,862 )
                 
Net unrealized appreciation on investments
    16,106,133       999,294  
                 
Realized gain (loss) on investments:
               
Control investments
    (7,765,119 )      
Affiliate investments
           
Non-control/Non-affiliate investments
    (5,685,100 )     106,000  
                 
Net realized gain (loss) on investments
    (13,450,219 )     106,000  
                 
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations
  $ 17,447,906     $ 9,454,352  
                 
Net investment income per common share — basic and diluted
  $ 0.26     $ 0.22  
                 
Earnings per common share — basic and diluted
  $ 0.32     $ 0.25  
                 
Weighted average common shares — basic and diluted
    54,641,164       37,880,435  
 
See notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


F-3


Table of Contents

Fifth Street Finance Corp.
 
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Net Assets
(unaudited)
 
                 
    Three Months
    Three Months
 
    Ended
    Ended
 
    December 31,
    December 31,
 
    2010     2009  
 
Operations:
               
Net investment income
  $ 14,055,602     $ 8,349,058  
Net unrealized appreciation on investments and interest rate swap
    16,842,523       999,294  
Net realized gain (loss) on investments
    (13,450,219 )     106,000  
                 
Net increase in net assets from operations
    17,447,906       9,454,352  
                 
Stockholder transactions:
               
Distributions to stockholders from net investment income
    (17,464,482 )     (10,227,326 )
                 
Net decrease in net assets from stockholder transactions
    (17,464,482 )     (10,227,326 )
                 
Capital share transactions:
               
Issuance of common stock, net
    4,814,310       (12,138 )
Issuance of common stock under dividend reinvestment plan
    949,974       486,392  
                 
Net increase in net assets from capital share transactions
    5,764,284       474,254  
                 
Total increase (decrease) in net assets
    5,747,708       (298,720 )
Net assets at beginning of period
    569,172,105       410,556,071  
                 
Net assets at end of period
  $ 574,919,813     $ 410,257,351  
                 
Net asset value per common share
  $ 10.44     $ 10.82  
                 
Common shares outstanding at end of period
    55,059,057       37,923,407  
 
See notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


F-4


Table of Contents

Fifth Street Finance Corp.
 
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(unaudited)
 
                 
    Three Months
    Three Months
 
    Ended
    Ended
 
    December 31,
    December 31,
 
    2010     2009  
 
Cash flows from operating activities:
               
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations
  $ 17,447,906     $ 9,454,352  
Adjustments to reconcile net increase in net assets resulting from operations to net cash used by operating activities:
               
Net unrealized appreciation on investments and interest rate swap
    (16,842,523 )     (999,294 )
Net realized (gains) losses on investments
    13,450,219       (106,000 )
PIK interest income
    (3,143,688 )     (1,961,774 )
Recognition of fee income
    (4,527,256 )     (915,141 )
Accretion of original issue discount on investments
    (388,637 )     (220,943 )
Amortization of deferred financing costs
    409,095        
Change in operating assets and liabilities:
               
PIK interest income received in cash
    5,109,022       525,194  
Fee income received
    8,005,581       4,834,926  
Increase in interest and fees receivable
    (850,144 )     (575,625 )
Increase in due from portfolio company
    (48,536 )     (27,269 )
(Increase) decrease in collateral posted to bank and other assets
    438,145       (984,419 )
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities
    122,488       (448,360 )
Increase (decrease) in base management fee payable
    902,977       (12,224 )
Increase in incentive fee payable
    654,762       143,001  
Increase in due to FSC, Inc. 
    178,503       24,115  
Increase in interest payable
    865,002       49,513  
Increase (decrease) in payments received in advance from portfolio companies
    (184,514 )     58,640  
Purchase of investments
    (238,577,119 )     (144,203,972 )
Proceeds from the sale of investments
          106,000  
Principal payments received on investments (scheduled repayments and revolver paydowns)
    7,883,358       1,973,601  
Principal payments received on investments (payoffs)
    49,720,635       3,885,000  
                 
Net cash used by operating activities
    (159,374,724 )     (129,400,679 )
                 
Cash flows from financing activities:
               
Dividends paid in cash
    (16,514,508 )     (9,740,934 )
Borrowings under SBA debentures payable
    50,300,000        
Borrowings under credit facilities
    126,000,000       38,000,000  
Repayments of borrowings under credit facilities
    (37,000,000 )      
Deferred financing costs paid
    (1,969,775 )      
Proceeds from the issuance of common stock
    4,992,802        
Offering costs paid
    (178,492 )     (281,358 )
                 
Net cash provided by financing activities
    125,630,027       27,977,708  
                 
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
    (33,744,697 )     (101,422,971 )
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
    76,765,254       113,205,287  
                 
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
  $ 43,020,557     $ 11,782,316  
                 
Supplemental Information:
               
Cash paid for interest
  $ 664,613     $  
Non-cash financing activities:
               
Issuance of shares of common stock under dividend reinvestment plan
  $ 949,974     $ 486,392  
 
See notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


F-5


Table of Contents

Fifth Street Finance Corp.

Consolidated Schedule of Investments
December 31, 2010
(unaudited)
 
                             
Portfolio Company/Type of
                     
Investment(1)(2)(5)
 
Industry
  Principal(8)     Cost     Fair Value  
 
                             
Control Investments(3)
                           
Lighting By Gregory, LLC (13)(14)
  Housewares & Specialties                        
First Lien Term Loan A, 9.75% due 2/28/2013
      $ 4,055,655     $ 3,996,187     $ 4,055,655  
First Lien Bridge Loan, 8% due 10/15/2010
        155,404       150,000        
97.38% membership interest
                410,000        
                             
                  4,556,187       4,055,655  
Nicos Polymers & Grinding Inc. (15)
  Environmental & facilities services                        
First Lien Term Loan, 8% due 12/4/2017
        5,033,333       4,957,235       5,033,333  
First Lien Revolver, 8% due 12/4/2017
                     
50% Membership Interest in CD Holdco, LLC
                168,086        
                             
                  5,125,321       5,033,333  
                             
Total Control Investments
              $ 9,681,508     $ 9,088,988  
                             
Affiliate Investments(4)
                           
O’Currance, Inc. 
  Data Processing & Outsourced Services                        
First Lien Term Loan A, 16.875% due 3/21/2012
        11,073,880     $ 10,997,715     $ 10,879,458  
First Lien Term Loan B, 16.875%, due 3/21/2012
        1,872,993       1,851,757       1,913,528  
1.75% Preferred Membership interest in O’Currance Holding Co., LLC
                130,413       3,587  
3.3% Membership Interest in O’Currance Holding Co., LLC
                250,000        
                             
                  13,229,885       12,796,573  
MK Network, LLC (13)(14)
  Education services                        
First Lien Term Loan A, 13.5% due 6/1/2012
        9,789,304       9,539,188       6,928,697  
First Lien Term Loan B, 17.5% due 6/1/2012
        4,950,941       4,748,004       3,448,666  
First Lien Revolver, Prime + 1.5% (10% floor), due 6/1/2010(10)
                     
11,030 Membership Units(6)
                771,575        
                             
                  15,058,767       10,377,363  
Caregiver Services, Inc. 
  Healthcare services                        
Second Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+6.85% (12% floor) due 2/25/2013
        6,783,839       6,492,617       6,768,521  
Second Lien Term Loan B, 16.5% due 2/25/2013
        14,808,616       14,275,137       14,353,376  
1,080,399 shares of Series A Preferred Stock
                1,080,398       1,349,201  
                             
                  21,848,152       22,471,098  
                             
Total Affiliate Investments
              $ 50,136,804     $ 45,645,034  
                             
Non-Control/Non-Affiliate Investments(7)
                           
CPAC, Inc. 
  Household Products                        
Subordinated Term Loan, 12.5% due 6/1/2012
        1,098,928     $ 1,098,928     $ 1,098,928  
                             
                  1,098,928       1,098,928  
Repechage Investments Limited
  Restaurants                        
First Lien Term Loan, 15.5% due 10/16/2011
        3,584,394       3,388,830       3,417,458  
7,500 shares of Series A Preferred Stock of Elephant & Castle, Inc. 
                750,000       438,902  
                             
                  4,138,830       3,856,360  
Traffic Control & Safety Corporation
  Construction and Engineering                        
Senior Term Loan A, 7.741% due 6/29/2012
        2,361,779       2,243,690       2,243,690  
Senior Term Loan B, 5.29% due 6/29/2012
        2,846,473       2,704,149       2,704,149  
Senior Term Loan C, 5.29% due 6/29/2012
        4,027,956       3,826,558       3,826,558  
Senior Revolver, 5.29% due 6/29/2012
        5,250,000       4,987,501       4,987,501  
Second Lien Term Loan, 15% due 5/28/2015(9)
        20,174,355       19,942,451       19,742,401  
Subordinated Loan, 15% due 5/28/2015
        4,755,534       4,755,534       4,221,399  
24,750 shares of Series B Preferred Stock
                247,500        
43,494 shares of Series D Preferred Stock(6)
                434,937        
25,000 shares of Common Stock
                2,500        
                             
                  39,144,820       37,725,698  


F-6


Table of Contents

 
Fifth Street Finance Corp.

Consolidated Schedule of Investments
December 31, 2010
(unaudited)
 
                             
Portfolio Company/Type of
                     
Investment(1)(2)(5)
 
Industry
  Principal(8)     Cost     Fair Value  
 
TBA Global, LLC
  Advertising                        
53,994 Senior Preferred Shares
                215,975       215,975  
191,977 Shares A Shares
                191,977       179,240  
                             
                  407,952       395,215  
Fitness Edge, LLC
  Leisure facilities                        
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+5.25% (10% floor), due 8/8/2012
        1,125,000       1,121,180       1,125,818  
First Lien Term Loan B, 15% due 8/8/2012
        5,667,603       5,619,154       5,726,159  
1,000 Common Units(6)
                42,908       121,545  
                             
                  6,783,242       6,973,522  
Filet of Chicken(9)
  Food Distributors                        
Second Lien Term Loan, 14.5% due 7/31/2012
        9,327,820       9,108,209       9,023,399  
                             
                  9,108,209       9,023,399  
Boot Barn(9)
  Apparel, accessories & luxury goods                        
247.06 shares of Series A Preferred Stock
                247,060       71,394  
1,308 shares of Common Stock
                131        
                             
                  247,191       71,394  
Premier Trailer Leasing, Inc.(9)(13)(14)
  Trucking                        
Second Lien Term Loan, 16.5% due 10/23/2012
        18,606,639       17,063,645       4,597,412  
285 shares of Common Stock
                1,140        
                             
                  17,064,785       4,597,412  
Pacific Press Technologies, Inc.(9)
                           
Second Lien Term Loan, 14.75% due 1/10/2013
  Industrial machinery     10,123,432       9,877,279       9,917,997  
33,463 shares of Common Stock
                344,513       739,542  
                             
                  10,221,792       10,657,539  
Rail Acquisition Corp.(9)
  Electronic manufacturing services                        
First Lien Term Loan, 17% due 9/1/2013
        16,821,351       14,042,454       11,680,404  
First Lien Revolver, 7.85% due 9/1/2013
        4,959,135       4,959,135       4,959,135  
                             
                  19,001,589       16,639,539  
Western Emulsions, Inc.(9)
  Construction materials                        
Second Lien Term Loan, 15% due 6/30/2014
        6,615,232       6,477,386       6,477,386  
                             
                  6,477,386       6,477,386  
Storyteller Theaters Corporation
  Movies & entertainment                        
1,692 shares of Common Stock
                169       61,613  
20,000 shares of Preferred Stock
                200,000       200,000  
                             
                  200,169       261,613  
HealthDrive Corporation(9)
  Healthcare services                        
First Lien Term Loan A, 10% due 7/17/2013
        6,562,970       6,255,358       6,485,832  
First Lien Term Loan B, 13% due 7/17/2013
        10,204,760       10,104,760       10,082,408  
First Lien Revolver, 12% due 7/17/2013
        500,000       490,000       546,086  
                             
                  16,850,118       17,114,326  
idX Corporation
  Distributors                        
Second Lien Term Loan, 14.5% due 7/1/2014
        13,658,366       13,436,082       13,415,216  
                             
                  13,436,082       13,415,216  
Cenegenics, LLC
  Healthcare services                        
First Lien Term Loan, 17% due 10/27/2014
        20,051,045       19,186,297       19,569,475  
414,419 Common Units(6)
                598,382       1,319,149  
                             
                  19,784,679       20,888,624  
IZI Medical Products, Inc. 
  Healthcare technology                        
First Lien Term Loan A, 12% due 3/31/2014
        4,249,775       4,196,179       4,232,773  
First Lien Term Loan B, 16% due 3/31/2014
        17,259,468       16,743,527       17,113,683  
First Lien Revolver, 10% due 3/31/2014(11)
              (32,500 )      
453,755 Preferred units of IZI Holdings, LLC(6)
                453,755       647,069  
                             
                  21,360,961       21,993,525  

F-7


Table of Contents

 
Fifth Street Finance Corp.

Consolidated Schedule of Investments
December 31, 2010
(unaudited)
 
                             
Portfolio Company/Type of
                     
Investment(1)(2)(5)
 
Industry
  Principal(8)     Cost     Fair Value  
 
Trans-Trade, Inc. 
  Air freight & logistics                        
First Lien Term Loan, 15.5% due 9/10/2014
        16,006,996       15,710,301       15,878,390  
First Lien Revolver, 12% due 9/10/2014
        2,000,000       1,890,667       1,956,755  
                             
                  17,600,968       17,835,145  
Riverlake Equity Partners II, LP
  Multi-sector holdings                        
1.89% limited partnership interest
                122,105       122,105  
                             
                  122,105       122,105  
Riverside Fund IV, LP
  Multi-sector holdings                        
0.25% limited partnership interest
                321,417       321,417  
                             
                  321,417       321,417  
ADAPCO, Inc. 
  Fertilizers & agricultural chemicals                        
First Lien Term Loan A, 10% due 12/17/2014
        8,500,000       8,311,428       8,365,910  
First Lien Term Loan B, 14% due 12/17/2014
        14,298,448       13,985,575       14,002,842  
First Lien Term Revolver, 10% due 12/17/2014
        4,250,000       4,026,520       4,170,584  
                             
                  26,323,523       26,539,336  
Ambath/Rebath Holdings, Inc. 
  Home improvement retail                        
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+7% (10% floor) due 12/30/2014
        9,250,000       9,048,648       8,951,281  
First Lien Term Loan B, 15% due 12/30/2014
        22,567,297       22,101,997       21,922,954  
First Lien Term Revolver, LIBOR+6.5% (9.5% floor) due 12/30/2014
        1,500,000       1,436,550       1,444,374  
                             
                  32,587,195       32,318,609  
JTC Education, Inc. 
  Education services                        
First Lien Term Loan, LIBOR+9.5% (12.5% floor) due 12/31/2014
        30,859,375       30,093,388       30,457,010  
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+9.5% (12.5% floor) due 12/31/2014(11)
              (377,222 )      
                             
                  29,716,166       30,457,010  
Tegra Medical, LLC
  Healthcare equipment                        
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+7% (10% floor) due 12/31/2014
        25,480,000       25,075,398       25,525,452  
First Lien Term Loan B, 14% due 12/31/2014
        22,212,109       21,864,318       22,164,301  
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+7% (10% floor) due 12/31/2014(11)
              (62,667 )      
                             
                  46,877,049       47,689,753  
Flatout, Inc. 
  Food retail                        
First Lien Term Loan A, 10% due 12/31/2014
        7,050,000       6,888,024       6,927,166  
First Lien Term Loan B, 15% due 12/31/2014
        12,863,830       12,560,321       12,686,564  
First Lien Revolver, 10% due 12/31/2014(11)
              (35,847 )      
                             
                  19,412,498       19,613,730  
Psilos Group Partners IV, LP
  Multi-sector holdings                        
2.52% limited partnership interest(12)
                       
                             
Mansell Group, Inc. 
  Advertising                        
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+7% (10% floor) due 4/30/2015
        9,937,500       9,755,254       9,753,678  
First Lien Term Loan B, LIBOR+9% (12% floor) due 4/30/2015
        8,046,018       7,898,194       7,995,656  
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+6% (9% floor) due 4/30/2015(11)
              (34,667 )      
                             
                  17,618,781       17,749,334  

F-8


Table of Contents

 
Fifth Street Finance Corp.

Consolidated Schedule of Investments
December 31, 2010
(unaudited)
 
                             
Portfolio Company/Type of
                     
Investment(1)(2)(5)
 
Industry
  Principal(8)     Cost     Fair Value  
 
NDSSI Holdings, Inc. 
  Electronic equipment & instruments                        
First Lien Term Loan, LIBOR+9.75% (12.75% floor) due 4/30/2015
        30,132,293       29,603,069       29,284,795  
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+7% (10% floor) due 4/30/2015
        3,500,000       3,415,385       3,397,632  
                             
                  33,018,454       32,682,427  
Eagle Hospital Physicians, Inc. 
  Healthcare services                        
First Lien Term Loan, LIBOR+8.75% (11.75% floor) due 8/11/2015
        8,000,000       7,801,966       7,808,773  
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+5.75% (8.75% floor) due 8/11/2015
              (60,076 )      
                             
                  7,741,890       7,803,773  
Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC
  Diversified support services                        
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+7% (9% floor) due 8/13/2015
        15,250,000       14,950,346       14,892,359  
First Lien Term Loan B, LIBOR+10% (13% floor) due 8/13/2015
        11,043,150       10,827,388       10,928,166  
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+7% (9% floor) due 8/13/2015
              (78,459 )      
                             
                  25,699,275       25,820,525  
Epic Acquisition, Inc. 
  Healthcare services                        
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+8% (11% floor) due 8/13/2015
        9,685,000       9,459,263       9,423,141  
First Lien Term Loan B, 15.25% due 8/13/2015
        17,031,895       16,624,539       16,680,678  
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+6.5% (9.5% floor) due 8/13/2015
        800,000       728,544       779,105  
                             
                  26,812,346       26,882,924  
Specialty Bakers LLC
  Food distributors                        
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+8.5% due 9/15/2015
        9,000,000       8,769,920       8,799,561  
First Lien Term Loan B, LIBOR+11% (13.5% floor) due 9/15/2015
        11,000,000       10,723,533       10,706,353  
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+8.5% due 9/15/2015
              (100,533 )      
                             
                  19,392,920       19,505,914  
CRGT, Inc. 
  IT consulting & other services                        
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+7.5% due 10/1/2015
        29,000,000       28,460,094       29,000,000  
First Lien Term Loan B, 12.5% due 10/1/2015
        22,000,000       21,582,000       22,000,000  
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+7.5% due 10/1/2015
              (237,500 )      
                             
                  49,804,594       51,000,000  
Welocalize, Inc. 
  Internet software & services                        
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+8% (10% floor) due 11/19/2015
        16,400,000       16,079,508       16,400,000  
First Lien Term Loan, LIBOR+9% (12.25% floor) due 11/19/2015
        21,030,634       20,624,634       21,030,634  
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+7% (9% floor) due 11/19/2015
        1,250,000       1,134,000       1,250,000  
2,086,163 Common Units in RPWL Holdings, LLC
                2,086,163       2,086,163  
                             
                  39,924,305       40,766,797  

F-9


Table of Contents

 
Fifth Street Finance Corp.

Consolidated Schedule of Investments
December 31, 2010
(unaudited)
 
                             
Portfolio Company/Type of
                     
Investment(1)(2)(5)
 
Industry
  Principal(8)     Cost     Fair Value  
 
Miche Bag, LLC
  Apparel, accessories & luxury goods                        
First Lien Term Loan B, LIBOR+9% (12% floor) due 12/7/2013
        15,500,000       15,118,187       15,500,000  
First Lien Term Loan, LIBOR+10% (16% floor) due 12/7/2015
        17,034,000       14,152,177       14,534,000  
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+7% (10% floor) due 12/7/2015
              (124,555 )      
10,371 Preferred Equity units in Miche Holdings, LLC
                1,037,112       1,037,112  
146,289 Series D Common Equity units in Miche Holdings, LLC
                1,462,888       1,462,888  
                             
                  31,645,809       32,534,000  
Bunker Hill Capital II (QP), L.P. 
  Multi-sector holdings                        
0.50% limited partnership interest(12)
                       
                             
                         
Dominion Diagnostics, LLC
  Healthcare services                        
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+7% (9% floor) due 12/17/2015
        30,750,000       30,140,651       30,750,000  
First Lien Term Loan, LIBOR+9% (12.5% floor) due 12/17/2015
        20,008,333       19,615,000       20,008,333  
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+6.5% (9% floor) due 12/17/2015
              (98,083 )      
                             
                  49,657,568       50,758,333  
Advanced Pain Management
  Healthcare services                        
First Lien Term Loan, LIBOR+5% (6.75% floor) due 12/22/2015
        8,200,000       8,056,673       8,200,000  
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+5% (6.75% floor) due 12/22/2015
              (5,900 )      
                             
                  8,050,773       8,200,000  
DISA, Inc. 
  Human resources &
employment services
                       
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+7.5% (8.25% floor) due 12/30/2015
        13,000,000       12,727,732       13,000,000  
First Lien Term Loan B, LIBOR+11.5% (12.5% floor) due 12/30/2015
        8,300,346       8,128,965       8,300,346  
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+6% (7% floor) due 12/30/2015
              (82,593 )      
                             
                  20,774,104       21,300,346  
Saddleback Fence and Vinyl Products, Inc.(9)(16)
  Building products                        
First Lien Term Loan, 8% due 11/30/2013
        757,516       757,516       757,516  
First Lien Revolver, 8% due 11/30/2011
                     
                             
                  757,516       757,516  
Best Vinyl Fence & Deck, LLC.(9)(16)
  Building Products                        
First Lien Term Loan A, 8% due 11/30/2013
        2,020,043       1,916,192       2,020,043  
First Lien Term Loan B, 8% due 5/31/2011
        3,787,580       3,787,580       3,787,580  
First Lien Revolver, 8% due 11/30/2011
                     
25,641 Shares of Series A Preferred Stock in Vanguard Vinyl, Inc. 
                253,846        
25,641 Shares of Common Stock in Vanguard Vinyl, Inc. 
                2,564        
                             
                  5,960,182       5,807,623  
Total Non-Control/Non-Affiliate Investments
              $ 695,146,171     $ 687,661,313  
                             
Total Portfolio Investments
              $ 754,964,483     $ 742,395,335  
                             
 
 
(1) All debt investments are income producing unless otherwise noted in (13) or (14). Equity is non-income producing unless otherwise noted.

F-10


Table of Contents

 
Fifth Street Finance Corp.

Consolidated Schedule of Investments
December 31, 2010
(unaudited)
 
 
(2) See Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for portfolio composition by geographic region.
 
(3) Control Investments are defined by the Investment Company Act of 1940 (“1940 Act”) as investments in companies in which the Company owns more than 25% of the voting securities or maintains greater than 50% of the board representation.
 
(4) Affiliate Investments are defined by the 1940 Act as investments in companies in which the Company owns between 5% and 25% of the voting securities.
 
(5) Equity ownership may be held in shares or units of companies related to the portfolio companies.
 
(6) Income producing through payment of dividends or distributions.
 
(7) Non-Control/Non-Affiliate Investments are defined by the 1940 Act as investments that are neither Control Investments nor Affiliate Investments.
 
(8) Principal includes accumulated PIK interest and is net of repayments.
 
(9) Interest rates have been adjusted on certain term loans and revolvers. These rate adjustments are temporary in nature due to financial or payment covenant violations in the original credit agreements, or permanent in nature per loan amendment or waiver documents. The table below summarizes these rate adjustments by portfolio company:
 
                 
Portfolio Company
 
Effective date
 
Cash interest
 
PIK interest
 
Reason
 
Traffic Control & Safety Corp.
  May 28, 2010   −4.0% on Term Loan   + 1.0% on Term Loan   Per restructuring agreement
Filet of Chicken
  October 1, 2010   +1.0% on Term Loan   + 1.0% on Term Loan   Tier pricing per waiver agreement
Premier Trailer Leasing, Inc.
  August 4, 2009   +4.0% on Term Loan       Default interest per credit agreement
HealthDrive Corporation
  April 30, 2009   +2.0% on Term Loan A       Per waiver agreement
 
(10) Revolving credit line has been suspended and is deemed unlikely to be renewed in the future.
 
(11) Amounts represent unearned income related to undrawn commitments.
 
(12) Represents an unfunded commitment to fund a limited partnership interest.
 
(13) Investment was on cash non-accrual status as of December 31, 2010.
 
(14) Investment was on PIK non-accrual status as of December 31, 2010.
 
(15) On October 13, 2010, Nicos Polymers & Grinding, Inc., an existing portfolio company, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy as part of a restructuring of that investment. On December 2, 2010, the Company and the major shareholder of Nicos Polymers & Grinding, Inc. closed on a restructuring agreement via an out of court foreclosure process, resulting in a restructured facility and these terms.
 
(16) On November 4, 2010, the Company held a foreclosure auction of the assets of Vanguard Vinyl, Inc., an existing portfolio company, as part of a loan restructuring. The restructuring broke up Vanguard Vinyl, Inc. into two operating companies. Saddleback Fence and Vinyl Products, Inc., which is located in California, and Best Vinyl Fence & Deck, LLC, which will manage operations in Utah and Hawaii, and resulted in a restructured facility and these terms.
 
See notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


F-11


Table of Contents

Fifth Street Finance Corp.
 
Consolidated Schedule of Investments
September 30, 2010
 
                             
Portfolio Company/Type of Investment(1)(2)(5)
 
Industry
  Principal(8)     Cost     Fair Value  
 
Control Investments(3)
                           
Lighting By Gregory, LLC(13)(14)
  Housewares &
Specialties
                       
First Lien Term Loan A, 9.75% due 2/28/2013
      $ 5,419,495     $ 4,728,589     $ 1,503,716  
First Lien Term Loan B, 14.5% due 2/28/2013
        8,575,783       6,906,440       2,196,284  
First Lien Bridge Loan, 8% due 10/15/2010
        152,312       150,000        
97.38% membership interest
                410,000        
                             
                  12,195,029       3,700,000  
                             
Total Control Investments
              $ 12,195,029     $ 3,700,000  
                             
Affiliate Investments(4)
                           
O’Currance, Inc. 
  Data Processing
& Outsourced
Services
                       
First Lien Term Loan A, 16.875% due 3/21/2012
        10,961,448     $ 10,869,262     $ 10,805,775  
First Lien Term Loan B, 16.875%, due 3/21/2012
        1,853,976       1,828,494       1,896,645  
1.75% Preferred Membership interest in O’Currance Holding Co., LLC
                130,413       38,592  
3.3% Membership Interest in O’Currance Holding Co., LLC
                250,000        
                             
                  13,078,169       12,741,012  
MK Network, LLC(13)(14)
  Education
services
                       
First Lien Term Loan A, 13.5% due 6/1/2012
        9,740,358       9,539,188       7,913,140  
First Lien Term Loan B, 17.5% due 6/1/2012
        4,926,187       4,748,004       3,938,660  
First Lien Revolver, Prime + 1.5% (10% floor), due 6/1/2010(10)
                     
11,030 Membership Units(6)
                771,575        
                             
                  15,058,767       11,851,800  
Caregiver Services, Inc. 
  Healthcare
services
                       
Second Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+6.85% (12% floor) due 2/25/2013
        7,141,190       6,813,431       7,113,622  
Second Lien Term Loan B, 16.5% due 2/25/2013
        14,692,015       14,102,756       14,179,626  
1,080,399 shares of Series A Preferred Stock
                1,080,398       1,335,999  
                             
                  21,996,585       22,629,247  
                             
Total Affiliate Investments
              $ 50,133,521     $ 47,222,059  
                             
Non-Control/Non-Affiliate Investments(7)
                           
CPAC, Inc. 
  Household
Products
                       
Subordinated Term Loan, 12.5% due 6/1/2012
        1,064,910     $ 1,064,910     $ 1,064,910  
                             
                  1,064,910       1,064,910  
Vanguard Vinyl, Inc.(9)(13)(14)
  Building
Products
                       
First Lien Term Loan, 12% due 3/30/2013
        7,000,000       6,827,373       5,812,199  
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+7% (10% floor) due 3/30/2013
        1,250,000       1,207,895       1,029,268  
25,641 Shares of Series A Preferred Stock
                253,846        
25,641 Shares of Common Stock
                2,564        
                             
                  8,291,678       6,841,467  
Repechage Investments Limited
  Restaurants                        
First Lien Term Loan, 15.5% due 10/16/2011
        3,708,971       3,475,906       3,486,342  
7,500 shares of Series A Preferred Stock of Elephant & Castle, Inc. 
                750,000       354,114  
                             
                  4,225,906       3,840,456  


F-12


Table of Contents

 
Fifth Street Finance Corp.
 
Consolidated Schedule of Investments
September 30, 2010
 
                             
Portfolio Company/Type of Investment(1)(2)(5)
 
Industry
  Principal(8)     Cost     Fair Value  
 
Traffic Control & Safety Corporation(9)
  Construction and
Engineering
                       
Second Lien Term Loan, 15% due 5/28/2015
        19,969,524       19,724,493       19,440,090  
Subordinated Loan, 15% due 5/28/2015
        4,577,800       4,577,800       4,404,746  
24,750 shares of Series B Preferred Stock
                247,500        
43,494 shares of Series D Preferred Stock(6)
                434,937        
25,000 shares of Common Stock
                2,500        
                             
                  24,987,230       23,844,836  
Nicos Polymers & Grinding Inc.(9)(13)(14)
  Environmental
& facilities
services
                       
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+5% (10% floor), due 7/17/2012
        3,154,876       3,040,465       1,782,181  
First Lien Term Loan B, 13.5% due 7/17/2012
        6,180,185       5,713,125       3,347,672  
3.32% Interest in Crownbrook Acquisition I LLC
                168,086        
                             
                  8,921,676       5,129,853  
TBA Global, LLC(9)
  Advertising                        
Second Lien Term Loan B, 14.5% due 8/3/2012
        10,840,081       10,594,939       10,625,867  
53,994 Senior Preferred Shares
                215,975       215,975  
191,977 Shares A Shares
                191,977       179,240  
                             
                  11,002,891       11,021,082  
Fitness Edge, LLC
  Leisure
Facilities
                       
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+5.25% (10% floor), due 8/8/2012
        1,250,000       1,245,136       1,247,418  
First Lien Term Loan B, 15% due 8/8/2012
        5,631,547       5,575,477       5,674,493  
1,000 Common Units(6)
                42,908       118,132  
                             
                  6,863,521       7,040,043  
Filet of Chicken(9)
  Food
Distributors
                       
Second Lien Term Loan, 14.5% due 7/31/2012
        9,316,518       9,063,155       8,964,766  
                             
                  9,063,155       8,964,766  
Boot Barn(9)
  Apparel,
accessories &
luxury goods
                       
Second Lien Term Loan, 14.5% due 10/3/2013
        23,545,479       23,288,566       23,477,539  
247.06 shares of Series A Preferred Stock
                247,060       71,394  
1,308 shares of Common Stock
                131        
                             
                             
                  23,535,757       23,548,933  
Premier Trailer Leasing, Inc.(9)(13)(14)
  Trucking                        
Second Lien Term Loan, 16.5% due 10/23/2012
        18,452,952       17,063,645       4,597,412  
285 shares of Common Stock
                1,140        
                             
                  17,064,785       4,597,412  
Pacific Press Technologies, Inc.(9)
                           
Second Lien Term Loan, 14.75% due 7/10/2013
  Industrial
machinery
    10,071,866       9,798,901       9,829,869  
33,786 shares of Common Stock
                344,513       402,894  
                             
                  10,143,414       10,232,763  
Goldco, LLC
                           
Second Lien Term Loan, 17.5% due 1/31/2013
  Restaurants     8,355,688       8,259,479       8,259,479  
                             
                  8,259,479       8,259,479  
Rail Acquisition Corp.(9)
  Electronic
manufacturing
services
                       
First Lien Term Loan, 17% due 9/1/2013
        16,315,866       13,536,969       12,854,425  
First Lien Revolver, 7.85% due 9/1/2013
        5,201,103       5,201,103       5,201,103  
                             
                  18,738,072       18,055,528  

F-13


Table of Contents

 
Fifth Street Finance Corp.
 
Consolidated Schedule of Investments
September 30, 2010
 
                             
Portfolio Company/Type of Investment(1)(2)(5)
 
Industry
  Principal(8)     Cost     Fair Value  
 
Western Emulsions, Inc.(9)
  Construction
materials
                       
Second Lien Term Loan, 15% due 6/30/2014
        17,864,713       17,475,899       17,039,751  
                             
                  17,475,899       17,039,751  
Storyteller Theaters Corporation
  Movies
& entertainment
                       
1,692 shares of Common Stock
                169       61,613  
20,000 shares of Preferred Stock
                200,000       200,000  
                             
                  200,169       261,613  
HealthDrive Corporation(9)
  Healthcare
services
                       
First Lien Term Loan A, 10% due 7/17/2013
        6,662,970       6,324,339       6,488,990  
First Lien Term Loan B, 13% due 7/17/2013
        10,178,726       10,068,726       9,962,414  
First Lien Revolver, 12% due 7/17/2013
        500,000       489,000       508,967  
                             
                  16,882,065       16,960,371  
idX Corporation
  Distributors                        
Second Lien Term Loan, 14.5% due 7/1/2014
        13,588,794       13,350,633       13,258,317  
                             
                  13,350,633       13,258,317  
Cenegenics, LLC
  Healthcare
services
                       
First Lien Term Loan, 17% due 10/27/2014
        20,172,004       19,257,215       19,544,864  
414,419 Common Units(6)
                598,382       1,417,886  
                             
                  19,855,597       20,962,750  
IZI Medical Products, Inc. 
  Healthcare
technology
                       
First Lien Term Loan A, 12% due 3/31/2014
        4,449,775       4,387,947       4,406,684  
First Lien Term Loan B, 16% due 3/31/2014
        17,258,033       16,702,405       17,092,868  
First Lien Revolver, 10% due 3/31/2014(11)
              (35,000 )     (35,000 )
453,755 Preferred units of IZI Holdings, LLC(6)
                453,755       676,061  
                             
                  21,509,107       22,140,613  
Trans-Trade, Inc. 
  Air freight
& logistics
                       
First Lien Term Loan, 15.5% due 9/10/2014
        12,751,463       12,536,099       12,549,159  
First Lien Revolver, 12% due 9/10/2014
        1,500,000       1,468,667       1,491,373  
                             
                  14,004,766       14,040,532  
Riverlake Equity Partners II, LP
  Multi-sector
holdings
                       
1.87% limited partnership interest
                33,640       33,640  
                             
                  33,640       33,640  
Riverside Fund IV, LP
  Multi-sector
holdings
                       
0.33% limited partnership interest
                135,825       135,825  
                             
                  135,825       135,825  
ADAPCO, Inc. 
  Fertilizers
& agricultural
chemicals
                       
First Lien Term Loan A, 10% due 12/17/2014
        9,000,000       8,789,498       8,806,763  
First Lien Term Loan B, 14% due 12/17/2014
        14,225,615       13,892,772       13,897,677  
First Lien Term Revolver, 10% due 12/17/2014
        4,250,000       4,012,255       4,107,420  
                             
                  26,694,525       26,811,860  

F-14


Table of Contents

 
Fifth Street Finance Corp.
 
Consolidated Schedule of Investments
September 30, 2010
 
                             
Portfolio Company/Type of Investment(1)(2)(5)
 
Industry
  Principal(8)     Cost     Fair Value  
 
Ambath/Rebath Holdings, Inc. 
  Home
improvement
retail
                       
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+7% (10% floor) due 12/30/2014
        9,500,000       9,277,900       9,127,886  
First Lien Term Loan B, 15% due 12/30/2014
        22,423,729       21,920,479       21,913,276  
First Lien Term Revolver, LIBOR+6.5% (9.5% floor) due 12/30/2014
        1,500,000       1,432,500       1,442,696  
                             
                  32,630,879       32,483,858  
JTC Education, Inc. 
  Education
services
                       
First Lien Term Loan, LIBOR+9.5% (12.5% floor) due 12/31/2014
        31,054,688       30,243,946       30,660,049  
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+9.5% (12.5% floor) due 12/31/2014(11)
              (401,111 )     (401,111 )
                             
                  29,842,835       30,258,938  
Tegra Medical, LLC
  Healthcare
equipment
                       
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+7% (10% floor) due 12/31/2014
        26,320,000       25,877,206       26,250,475  
First Lien Term Loan B, 14% due 12/31/2014
        22,098,966       21,729,057       22,114,113  
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+7% (10% floor) due 12/31/2014(11)
              (66,667 )     (66,667 )
                             
                  47,539,596       48,297,921  
Flatout, Inc. 
  Food retail                        
First Lien Term Loan A, 10% due 12/31/2014
        7,300,000       7,120,671       7,144,136  
First Lien Term Loan B, 15% due 12/31/2014
        12,862,760       12,539,879       12,644,316  
First Lien Revolver, 10% due 12/31/2014(11)
              (38,136 )     (38,136 )
                             
                  19,622,414       19,750,316  
Psilos Group Partners IV, LP
  Multi-sector
holdings
                       
2.53% limited partnership interest(12)
                       
                             
                         
                             
Mansell Group, Inc. 
  Advertising                        
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+7% (10% floor) due 4/30/2015
        5,000,000       4,909,720       4,915,885  
First Lien Term Loan B, LIBOR+9% (13.5% floor) due 4/30/2015
        4,025,733       3,952,399       3,946,765  
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+6% (9% floor) due 4/30/2015(11)
              (36,667 )     (36,667 )
                             
                  8,825,452       8,825,983  
NDSSI Holdings, Inc. 
  Electronic
equipment
& instruments
                       
First Lien Term Loan, LIBOR+9.75% (13.75% floor) due 9/10/2014
        30,245,558       29,684,880       29,409,043  
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+7% (10% floor) due 9/10/2014
        3,500,000       3,409,615       3,478,724  
                             
                  33,094,495       32,887,767  
Eagle Hospital Physicians, Inc. 
  Healthcare
services
                       
First Lien Term Loan, LIBOR+8.75% (11.75% floor) due 8/11/2015
        8,000,000       7,783,892       7,783,892  
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+5.75% (8.75% floor) due 8/11/2015
              (64,394 )     (64,394 )
                             
                  7,719,498       7,719,498  
Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC
  Diversified
support
services
                       
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+7% (9% floor) due 8/13/2015
        15,500,000       15,171,867       15,171,867  
First Lien Term Loan B, LIBOR+10% (13% floor) due 8/13/2015
        11,014,977       10,782,174       10,782,174  
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+7% (9% floor) due 8/13/2015
        376,852       292,196       292,196  
                             
                  26,246,237       26,246,237  

F-15


Table of Contents

 
Fifth Street Finance Corp.
 
Consolidated Schedule of Investments
September 30, 2010
 
                             
Portfolio Company/Type of Investment(1)(2)(5)
 
Industry
  Principal(8)     Cost     Fair Value  
 
Epic Acquisition, Inc. 
  Healthcare
services
                       
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+8% (11% floor) due 8/13/2015
        7,750,000       7,554,728       7,554,728  
First Lien Term Loan B, 15.25% due 8/13/2015
        13,555,178       13,211,532       13,211,532  
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+6.5% (9.5% floor) due 8/13/2015
        300,000       223,634       223,634  
                             
                  20,989,894       20,989,894  
Specialty Bakers LLC
  Food
distributors
                       
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+8.5% due 9/15/2015
        9,000,000       8,755,670       8,755,670  
First Lien Term Loan B, LIBOR+11% (13.5% floor) due 9/15/2015
        11,000,000       10,704,008       10,704,008  
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+8.5% due 9/15/2015
        2,000,000       1,892,367       1,892,367  
                             
                  21,352,045       21,352,045  
                             
Total Non-Control/Non-Affiliate Investments
              $ 530,168,045     $ 512,899,257  
                             
Total Portfolio Investments
              $ 592,496,595     $ 563,821,316  
                             
 
 
(1) All debt investments are income producing unless otherwise noted in (13) or (14). Equity is non-income producing unless otherwise noted.
 
(2) See Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for portfolio composition by geographic region.
 
(3) Control Investments are defined by the Investment Company Act of 1940 (“1940 Act”) as investments in companies in which the Company owns more than 25% of the voting securities or maintains greater than 50% of the board representation.
 
(4) Affiliate Investments are defined by the 1940 Act as investments in companies in which the Company owns between 5% and 25% of the voting securities.
 
(5) Equity ownership may be held in shares or units of companies related to the portfolio companies.
 
(6) Income producing through payment of dividends or distributions.
 
(7) Non-Control/Non-Affiliate Investments are defined by the 1940 Act as investments that are neither Control Investments nor Affiliate Investments.
 
(8) Principal includes accumulated PIK interest and is net of repayments.
 
(9) Interest rates have been adjusted on certain term loans and revolvers. These rate adjustments are temporary in nature due to financial or payment covenant violations in the original credit agreements, or permanent in nature per loan amendment or waiver documents. The table below summarizes these rate adjustments by portfolio company:
 

F-16


Table of Contents

 
Fifth Street Finance Corp.
 
Consolidated Schedule of Investments
September 30, 2010
 
                                 
Portfolio Company
 
Effective date
 
Cash interest
 
PIK interest
 
Reason
 
Nicos Polymers & Grinding, Inc. 
    February 10, 2008               + 2.0 % on Term Loan A & B     Per waiver agreement  
TBA Global, LLC
    February 15, 2008               + 2.0 % on Term Loan B     Per waiver agreement  
Vanguard Vinyl, Inc. 
    April 1, 2008       + 0.5 % on Term Loan             Per loan amendment  
Filet of Chicken
    January 1, 2009       + 1.0 % on Term Loan             Tier pricing per waiver agreement  
Boot Barn
    January 1, 2009       + 1.0 % on Term Loan     + 2.5 % on Term Loan     Tier pricing per waiver agreement  
HealthDrive Corporation
    April 30, 2009       + 2.0 % on Term Loan A             Per waiver agreement  
Premier Trailer Leasing, Inc. 
    August 4, 2009       + 4.0 % on Term Loan             Default interest per credit agreement  
Rail Acquisition Corp. 
    May 1, 2010       − 4.5 % on Term Loan     − 0.5 % on Term Loan     Per restructuring agreement  
Traffic Control & Safety Corp. 
    May 28, 2010       − 4.0 % on Term Loan     + 1.0 % on Term Loan     Per restructuring agreement  
Pacific Press Technologies, Inc. 
    July 1, 2010       − 2.0 % on Term Loan     − 0.75 % on Term Loan     Per waiver agreement  
Western Emulsions, Inc. 
    September 30, 2010               + 3.0 % on Term Loan     Per loan agreement  
 
(10) Revolving credit line has been suspended and is deemed unlikely to be renewed in the future.
 
(11) Amounts represent unearned income related to undrawn commitments.
 
(12) Represents an unfunded commitment to fund a limited partnership interest.
 
(13) Investment was on cash non-accrual status as of September 30, 2010.
 
(14) Investment was on PIK non-accrual status as of September 30, 2010.

F-17


Table of Contents

FIFTH STREET FINANCE CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
Note 1.   Organization
 
Fifth Street Mezzanine Partners III, L.P. (the “Partnership”), a Delaware limited partnership, was organized on February 15, 2007 to primarily invest in debt securities of small and middle market companies. FSMPIII GP, LLC was the Partnership’s general partner (the “General Partner”). The Partnership’s investments were managed by Fifth Street Management LLC (the “Investment Adviser”). The General Partner and Investment Adviser were under common ownership.
 
Effective January 2, 2008, the Partnership merged with and into Fifth Street Finance Corp. (the “Company”), an externally managed, closed-end, non-diversified management investment company that has elected to be treated as a business development company under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “1940 Act”). Fifth Street Finance Corp. is managed by the Investment Adviser. Prior to January 2, 2008, references to the Company are to the Partnership. Since January 2, 2008, references to the Company, FSC, “we” or “our” are to Fifth Street Finance Corp., unless the context otherwise requires.
 
The Company also has certain wholly-owned subsidiaries, including subsidiaries that are not consolidated for income tax purposes, which hold certain portfolio investments of the Company. The subsidiaries are consolidated with the Company, and the portfolio investments held by the subsidiaries are included in the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.
 
The Company’s shares are currently listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “FSC.” The following table reflects common stock offerings that have occurred since inception:
 
                             
Date
  Transaction   Shares     Offering price     Gross proceeds  
 
June 17, 2008
  Initial public offering     10,000,000     $ 14.12     $ 141.2 million  
July 21, 2009
  Follow-on public offering (including underwriters’ exercise of over-allotment option)     9,487,500     $ 9.25     $ 87.8 million  
September 25, 2009
  Follow-on public offering (including underwriters’ exercise of over-allotment option)     5,520,000     $ 10.50     $ 58.0 million  
January 27, 2010
  Follow-on public offering     7,000,000     $ 11.20     $ 78.4 million  
February 25, 2010
  Underwriters’ exercise of over-allotment option     300,500     $ 11.20     $ 3.4 million  
June 21, 2010
  Follow-on public offering (including underwriters’ exercise of over-allotment option)     9,200,000     $ 11.50     $ 105.8 million  
December 2010
  At-the-Market offering     429,110     $ 11.87(1 )   $ 5.1 million  
 
 
(1) Average offering price.
 
On February 3, 2010, the Company’s consolidated wholly-owned subsidiary, Fifth Street Mezzanine Partners IV, L.P., received a license, effective February 1, 2010, from the United States Small Business Administration, or SBA, to operate as a small business investment company, or SBIC, under Section 301(c) of the Small Business Investment Act of 1958. SBICs are designated to stimulate the flow of private equity capital to eligible small businesses. Under SBA regulations, SBICs may make loans to eligible small businesses and invest in the equity securities of small businesses.
 
The SBIC license allows the Company’s SBIC subsidiary to obtain leverage by issuing SBA-guaranteed debentures, subject to the issuance of a capital commitment by the SBA and other customary procedures. SBA-guaranteed debentures are non-recourse, interest only debentures with interest payable semi-annually and have a ten year maturity. The principal amount of SBA-guaranteed debentures is not required to be paid prior to maturity


F-18


Table of Contents

FIFTH STREET FINANCE CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
but may be prepaid at any time without penalty. The interest rate of SBA-guaranteed debentures is fixed on a semi-annual basis at a market-driven spread over U.S. Treasury Notes with 10-year maturities.
 
SBA regulations currently limit the amount that the Company’s SBIC subsidiary may borrow to a maximum of $150 million when it has at least $75 million in regulatory capital, receives a capital commitment from the SBA and has been through an examination by the SBA subsequent to licensing. As of December 31, 2010, the Company’s SBIC subsidiary had $75 million in regulatory capital. The SBA has issued a capital commitment to the Company’s SBIC subsidiary in the amount of $150 million, and $123.3 million of SBA debentures were outstanding as of December 31, 2010. $73.0 million of these debentures bore an interest rate of 3.50%, including the SBA annual charge of 0.285%, while the remainder do not have a locked interest rate.
 
The SBA restricts the ability of SBICs to repurchase their capital stock. SBA regulations also include restrictions on a “change of control” or transfer of an SBIC and require that SBICs invest idle funds in accordance with SBA regulations. In addition, the Company’s SBIC subsidiary may also be limited in its ability to make distributions to the Company if it does not have sufficient capital, in accordance with SBA regulations.
 
The Company’s SBIC subsidiary is subject to regulation and oversight by the SBA, including requirements with respect to maintaining certain minimum financial ratios and other covenants. Receipt of an SBIC license does not assure that the SBIC subsidiary will receive SBA-guaranteed debenture funding and is dependent upon the SBIC subsidiary continuing to be in compliance with SBA regulations and policies.
 
The SBA, as a creditor, will have a superior claim to the SBIC subsidiary’s assets over the Company’s stockholders in the event the Company liquidates the SBIC subsidiary or the SBA exercises its remedies under the SBA-guaranteed debentures issued by the SBIC subsidiary upon an event of default.
 
The Company has received exemptive relief from the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) to permit it to exclude the debt of the SBIC subsidiary guaranteed by the SBA from the 200% asset coverage test under the 1940 Act. This allows the Company increased flexibility under the 200% asset coverage test.
 
Note 2.   Significant Accounting Policies
 
FASB Accounting Standards Codification:
 
The issuance of FASB Accounting Standards Codificationtm (the “Codification”) on July 1, 2009 (effective for interim or annual reporting periods ending after September 15, 2009), changes the way that U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) are referenced. Beginning on that date, the Codification officially became the single source of authoritative nongovernmental GAAP; however, SEC registrants must also consider rules, regulations and interpretive guidance issued by the SEC or its staff. The switch affects the way companies refer to GAAP in financial statements and in their accounting policies. References to standards will consist solely of the number used in the Codification’s structural organization.
 
Consistent with the effective date of the Codification, financial statements for periods ending after September 15, 2009, refer to the Codification structure, not pre-Codification historical GAAP.
 
Basis of Presentation and Liquidity:
 
The Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with GAAP and Regulation S-X. In the opinion of management, all adjustments of a normal recurring nature considered necessary for the fair presentation of the Consolidated Financial Statements have been made. The financial results of the Company’s portfolio investments are not consolidated in the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.
 
Although the Company expects to fund the growth of its investment portfolio through the net proceeds from the recent and future equity offerings, the Company’s dividend reinvestment plan, and issuances of senior securities or future borrowings, to the extent permitted by the 1940 Act, the Company cannot assure that its plans to raise capital


F-19


Table of Contents

FIFTH STREET FINANCE CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
will be successful. In addition, the Company intends to distribute to its stockholders between 90% and 100% of its taxable income each year in order to satisfy the requirements applicable to Regulated Investment Companies (“RICs”) under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code (“Code”). Consequently, the Company may not have the funds or the ability to fund new investments, to make additional investments in its portfolio companies, to fund its unfunded commitments to portfolio companies or to repay borrowings. In addition, the illiquidity of its portfolio investments may make it difficult for the Company to sell these investments when desired and, if the Company is required to sell these investments, it may realize significantly less than their recorded value.
 
Use of Estimates:
 
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions affecting amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. These estimates are based on the information that is currently available to the Company and on various other assumptions that the Company believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates under different assumptions and conditions. The most significant estimates inherent in the preparation of the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements are the valuation of investments and revenue recognition.
 
The Consolidated Financial Statements include portfolio investments at fair value of $742.4 million and $563.8 million at December 31, 2010 and September 30, 2010, respectively. The portfolio investments represent 129.1% and 99.1% of net assets at December 31, 2010 and September 30, 2010, respectively, and their fair values have been determined by the Company’s Board of Directors in good faith in the absence of readily available market values. Because of the inherent uncertainty of valuation, the determined values may differ significantly from the values that would have been used had a ready market existed for the investments, and the differences could be material.
 
The Company classifies its investments in accordance with the requirements of the 1940 Act. Under the 1940 Act, “Control Investments” are defined as investments in companies in which the Company owns more than 25% of the voting securities or has rights to maintain greater than 50% of the board representation; “Affiliate Investments” are defined as investments in companies in which the Company owns between 5% and 25% of the voting securities; and “Non-Control/Non-Affiliate Investments” are defined as investments that are neither Control Investments nor Affiliate Investments.
 
Fair Value Measurements:
 
ASC 820 Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (“ASC 820”), defines fair value as the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. A liability’s fair value is defined as the amount that would be paid to transfer the liability to a new obligor, not the amount that would be paid to settle the liability with the creditor. Where available, fair value is based on observable market prices or parameters or derived from such prices or parameters. Where observable prices or inputs are not available or reliable, valuation techniques are applied. These valuation techniques involve some level of management estimation and judgment, the degree of which is dependent on the price transparency for the investments or market and the investments’ complexity.
 
Assets recorded at fair value in the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements are categorized based upon the level of judgment associated with the inputs used to measure their fair value.
 
Hierarchical levels, defined by ASC 820 and directly related to the amount of subjectivity associated with the inputs to fair valuation of these assets and liabilities, are as follows:
 
  •  Level 1 — Unadjusted, quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities at the measurement date.


F-20


Table of Contents

FIFTH STREET FINANCE CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
 
  •  Level 2 — Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data at the measurement date for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.
 
  •  Level 3 — Unobservable inputs that reflect management’s best estimate of what market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability at the measurement date. Consideration is given to the risk inherent in the valuation technique and the risk inherent in the inputs to the model.
 
Under ASC 820, the Company performs detailed valuations of its debt and equity investments on an individual basis, using market, income, and bond yield approaches as appropriate. In general, the Company utilizes a bond yield method for the majority of its investments, as long as it is appropriate. If, in the Company’s judgment, the bond yield approach is not appropriate, it may use the enterprise value approach, or, in certain cases, an alternative methodology potentially including an asset liquidation or expected recovery model.
 
Under the market approach, the Company estimates the enterprise value of the portfolio companies in which it invests. There is no one methodology to estimate enterprise value and, in fact, for any one portfolio company, enterprise value is best expressed as a range of fair values, from which the Company derives a single estimate of enterprise value. To estimate the enterprise value of a portfolio company, the Company analyzes various factors, including the portfolio company’s historical and projected financial results. Typically, private companies are valued based on multiples of EBITDA, cash flows, net income, revenues, or in limited cases, book value. The Company generally requires portfolio companies to provide annual audited and quarterly and monthly unaudited financial statements, as well as annual projections for the upcoming fiscal year.
 
Under the income approach, the Company generally prepares and analyzes discounted cash flow models based on projections of the future free cash flows of the business.
 
Under the bond yield approach, the Company uses bond yield models to determine the present value of the future cash flow streams of its debt investments. The Company reviews various sources of transactional data, including private mergers and acquisitions involving debt investments with similar characteristics, and assesses the information in the valuation process.
 
The Company’s Board of Directors undertakes a multi-step valuation process each quarter in connection with determining the fair value of the Company’s investments:
 
  •  The quarterly valuation process begins with each portfolio company or investment being initially valued by the deal team within the Investment Adviser responsible for the portfolio investment;
 
  •  Preliminary valuations are then reviewed and discussed with the principals of the Investment Adviser;
 
  •  Separately, independent valuation firms engaged by the Board of Directors prepare preliminary valuations on a selected basis and submit the reports to the Company;
 
  •  The deal team compares and contrasts its preliminary valuations to the preliminary valuations of the independent valuation firms;
 
  •  The deal team prepares a valuation report for the Valuation Committee of the Board of Directors;
 
  •  The Valuation Committee of the Board of Directors is apprised of the preliminary valuations of the independent valuation firms;
 
  •  The Valuation Committee of the Board of Directors reviews the preliminary valuations, and the deal team responds and supplements the preliminary valuations to reflect any comments provided by the Valuation Committee;
 
  •  The Valuation Committee of the Board of Directors makes a recommendation to the Board of Directors; and


F-21


Table of Contents

FIFTH STREET FINANCE CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
 
  •  The Board of Directors discusses valuations and determines the fair value of each investment in the Company’s portfolio in good faith.
 
The fair value of all of the Company’s investments at December 31, 2010 was determined by the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors is solely responsible for the valuation of the portfolio investments at fair value as determined in good faith pursuant to the Company’s valuation policy and a consistently applied valuation process.
 
The Board of Directors has engaged independent valuation firms to provide valuation assistance. Upon completion of their processes each quarter, the independent valuation firms provide the Company with written reports regarding the preliminary valuations of selected portfolio securities as of the close of such quarter. The Company will continue to engage independent valuation firms to provide assistance regarding the determination of the fair value of selected portfolio securities each quarter; however, the Board of Directors is ultimately and solely responsible for determining the fair value of the Company’s investments in good faith.
 
Realized gain or loss on the sale of investments is the difference between the proceeds received from dispositions of portfolio investments and their stated costs. Realized losses may also be recorded in connection with the Company’s determination that certain investments are considered worthless securities and/or meet the conditions for loss recognition per the applicable tax rules.
 
Investment Income:
 
Interest income, adjusted for amortization of premium and accretion of original issue discount, is recorded on an accrual basis to the extent that such amounts are expected to be collected. The Company stops accruing interest on investments when it is determined that interest is no longer collectible. In connection with its investment, the Company sometimes receives nominal cost equity that is valued as part of the negotiation process with the particular portfolio company. When the Company receives nominal cost equity, the Company allocates its cost basis in its investment between its debt securities and its nominal cost equity at the time of origination. Any resulting discount from recording the loan is accreted into interest income over the life of the loan.
 
Distributions of earnings from portfolio companies are recorded as dividend income when the distribution is received.
 
The Company has investments in debt securities which contain a payment-in-kind or “PIK” interest provision. PIK interest is computed at the contractual rate specified in each investment agreement and added to the principal balance of the investment and recorded as income.
 
Fee income consists of the monthly collateral management fees that the Company receives in connection with its debt investments and the accreted portion of the debt origination fees. The Company capitalizes upfront loan origination fees received in connection with investments. The unearned fee income from such fees is accreted into fee income, based on the straight line method or effective interest method as applicable, over the life of the investment.
 
The Company has also structured exit fees across certain of its portfolio investments to be received upon the future exit of those investments. These fees are to be paid to the Company upon the sooner to occur of (i) a sale of the borrower or substantially all of the assets of the borrower, (ii) the maturity date of the loan, or (iii) the date when full prepayment of the loan occurs. Exit fees are fees which are earned and payable upon the exit of a debt security and, similar to a prepayment penalty, are not accrued or otherwise included in net investment income until received. The receipt of such fees as well the timing of the Company’s receipt of such fees is contingent upon a successful exit event for each of the investments.
 
Cash and Cash Equivalents:
 
Cash and cash equivalents consist of demand deposits and highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less, when acquired. The Company places its cash and cash equivalents with financial institutions and, at


F-22


Table of Contents

FIFTH STREET FINANCE CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
times, cash held in bank accounts may exceed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insured limit. Included in cash and cash equivalents is $0.8 million that is held at Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (“Wells Fargo”) in connection with the Company’s three-year credit facility. The Company is restricted in terms of access to this cash until such time as the Company submits its required monthly reporting schedules and Wells Fargo verifies the Company’s compliance per the terms of the credit agreement.
 
Deferred Financing Costs:
 
Deferred financing costs consist of fees and expenses paid in connection with the closing of credit facilities and are capitalized at the time of payment. Deferred financing costs are amortized using the straight line method over the terms of the respective credit facilities. This amortization expense is included in interest expense in the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Operations.
 
Collateral posted to bank:
 
Collateral posted to bank consists of cash posted as collateral with respect to the Company’s interest rate swap. The Company is restricted in terms of access to this collateral until such swap is terminated or the swap agreement expires. Cash collateral posted is held in an account at Wells Fargo.
 
Interest Rate Swap:
 
The Company does not utilize hedge accounting and marks its interest rate swap to fair value on a quarterly basis through operations.
 
Offering Costs:
 
Offering costs consist of fees and expenses incurred in connection with the public offer and sale of the Company’s common stock, including legal, accounting, and printing fees. $0.3 million of offering costs have been charged to capital during the three months ended December 31, 2010.
 
Income Taxes:
 
As a RIC, the Company is not subject to federal income tax on the portion of its taxable income and gains distributed currently to its stockholders as a dividend. The Company intends to distribute between 90% and 100% of its taxable income and gains, within the Subchapter M rules, and thus the Company anticipates that it will not incur any federal or state income tax at the RIC level. As a RIC, the Company is also subject to a federal excise tax based on distributive requirements of its taxable income on a calendar year basis (e.g., calendar year 2011). The Company anticipates timely distribution of its taxable income within the tax rules; however, the Company incurred a de minimis federal excise tax for calendar years 2008 and 2009, and expects to incur a de minimis federal excise tax for the calendar year 2010. In addition, the Company may incur a federal excise tax in future years.
 
The purpose of the Company’s taxable subsidiaries is to permit the Company to hold equity investments in portfolio companies which are “pass through” entities for federal tax purposes in order to comply with the “source income” requirements contained in the RIC tax requirements. The taxable subsidiaries are not consolidated with the Company for income tax purposes and may generate income tax expense as a result of their ownership of certain portfolio investments. This income tax expense, if any, would be reflected in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations. The Company uses the asset and liability method to account for its taxable subsidiaries’ income taxes. Using this method, the Company recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities for the estimated future tax effects attributable to temporary differences between financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities. In addition, the Company recognizes deferred tax benefits associated with net operating carry forwards that it may use to offset future tax obligations. The Company measures deferred tax assets and liabilities using the enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which it expects to recover or settle those temporary differences.


F-23


Table of Contents

FIFTH STREET FINANCE CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
ASC 740 Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes (“ASC 740”) provides guidance for how uncertain tax positions should be recognized, measured, presented, and disclosed in the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements. ASC 740 requires the evaluation of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in the course of preparing the Company’s tax returns to determine whether the tax positions are “more-likely-than-not” of being sustained by the applicable tax authority. Tax positions not deemed to meet the more-likely-than-not threshold are recorded as a tax benefit or expense in the current year. Management’s determinations regarding ASC 740 may be subject to review and adjustment at a later date based upon factors including, but not limited to, an ongoing analysis of tax laws, regulations and interpretations thereof. The Company recognizes the tax benefits of uncertain tax positions only where the position is “more likely than not” to be sustained assuming examination by tax authorities. Management has analyzed the Company’s tax positions, and has concluded that no liability for unrecognized tax benefits should be recorded related to uncertain tax positions taken on returns filed for open tax years 2008 or 2009 or expected to be taken in the Company’s 2010 tax return. The Company identifies its major tax jurisdictions as U.S. Federal and New York State, and the Company is not aware of any tax positions for which it is reasonably possible that the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits will change materially in the next 12 months.
 
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
 
In January 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-06, Fair Value Measurements and Improving Disclosures About Fair Value Measurements (Topic 820), which provides for improving disclosures about fair value measurements, primarily significant transfers in and out of Levels 1 and 2, and activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. The new disclosures and clarifications of existing disclosures are effective for the interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, while the disclosures about the purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the roll forward activity in Level 3 fair value measurements are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010 and for the interim periods within those fiscal years. Except for certain detailed Level 3 disclosures, which are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010 and interim periods within those years, the new guidance became effective for the Company’s fiscal 2010 second quarter. The adoption of this disclosure-only guidance is included in Note 3 — Portfolio Investments and did not have an impact on the Company’s consolidated financial results.
 
In September 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2009-12, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820) — Investments in Certain Entities That Calculate Net Asset Value per Share (or Its Equivalent) which provides guidance on estimating the fair value of an alternative investment, amending ASC 820-10. The amendment is effective for interim and annual periods ending after December 15, 2009. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on either the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.
 
Note 3.   Portfolio Investments
 
At December 31, 2010, 129.1% of net assets or $742.4 million was invested in 45 long-term portfolio investments and 7.5% of net assets or $43.0 million was invested in cash and cash equivalents. In comparison, at September 30, 2010, 99.1% of net assets or $563.8 million was invested in 38 long-term portfolio investments and 13.5% of net assets or $76.8 million was invested in cash and cash equivalents. As of December 31, 2010, primarily all of the Company’s debt investments were secured by first or second priority liens on the assets of the portfolio companies. Moreover, the Company held equity investments in certain of its portfolio companies consisting of common stock, preferred stock or limited liability company interests designed to provide the Company with an opportunity for an enhanced rate of return. These instruments generally do not produce a current return, but are held for potential investment appreciation and capital gain.
 
During the three months ended December 31, 2010, the Company recorded net realized losses on investments of $13.5 million. During the three months ended December 31, 2009, the Company recorded a $0.1 million


F-24


Table of Contents

FIFTH STREET FINANCE CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
reduction to a previously recorded realized gain. During the three months ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, the Company recorded net unrealized appreciation of $16.8 million and $1.0 million, respectively.
 
The composition of the Company’s debt investments as of December 31, 2010 and September 30, 2010 at fixed rates and floating rates was as follows:
 
                                 
    December 31, 2010     September 30, 2010  
    Fair Value     % of Portfolio     Fair Value     % of Portfolio  
 
Fixed rate debt securities
  $ 366,003,445       50.00 %   $ 375,584,242       67.24 %
Floating rate debt securities
    366,014,988       50.00 %     182,995,709       32.76 %
                                 
Total
  $ 732,018,433       100.00 %   $ 558,579,951       100.00 %
                                 
 
The composition of the Company’s investments as of December 31, 2010 and September 30, 2010 at cost and fair value was as follows:
 
                                 
    December 31, 2010     September 30, 2010  
    Cost     Fair Value     Cost     Fair Value  
 
Investments in debt securities
  $ 743,136,969     $ 732,018,433     $ 585,529,301     $ 558,579,951  
Investments in equity securities
    11,827,514       10,376,902       6,967,294       5,241,365  
                                 
Total
  $ 754,964,483     $ 742,395,335     $ 592,496,595     $ 563,821,316  
                                 
 
The following table presents the financial instruments carried at fair value as of December 31, 2010, by caption on the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Assets and Liabilities for each of the three levels of hierarchy established by ASC 820.
 
                                 
    Level 1     Level 2     Level 3     Total  
 
Cash equivalents
  $     $     $     $  
Investments in debt securities (first lien)
                642,402,398       642,402,398  
Investments in debt securities (second lien)
                85,394,636       85,394,636  
Investments in debt securities (subordinated)
                4,221,399       4,221,399  
Investments in equity securities (preferred)
                3,963,240       3,963,240  
Investments in equity securities (common)
                6,413,662       6,413,662  
                                 
Total investments at fair value
  $     $     $ 742,395,335     $ 742,395,335  
Interest rate swap
          37,045             37,045  
                                 
Total liabilities at fair value
  $     $ 37,045     $     $ 37,045  
                                 


F-25


Table of Contents

FIFTH STREET FINANCE CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
The following table presents the financial instruments carried at fair value as of September 30, 2010, by caption on the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Assets and Liabilities for each of the three levels of hierarchy established by ASC 820.
 
                                 
    Level 1     Level 2     Level 3     Total  
 
Cash equivalents
  $     $     $     $  
Investments in debt securities (first lien)
                416,323,957       416,323,957  
Investments in debt securities (second lien)
                137,851,248       137,851,248  
Investments in debt securities (subordinated)
                4,404,746       4,404,746  
Investments in equity securities (preferred)
                2,892,135       2,892,135  
Investments in equity securities (common)
                2,349,230       2,349,230  
                                 
Total investments at fair value
  $     $     $ 563,821,316     $ 563,821,316  
Interest rate swap
          773,435             773,435  
                                 
Total liabilities at fair value
  $     $ 773,435     $     $ 773,435  
                                 
 
When a determination is made to classify a financial instrument within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy, the determination is based upon the fact that the unobservable factors are the most significant to the overall fair value measurement. However, Level 3 financial instruments typically include, in addition to the unobservable or Level 3 components, observable components (that is, components that are actively quoted and can be validated by external sources). Accordingly, the appreciation (depreciation) in the tables below includes changes in fair value due in part to observable factors that are part of the valuation methodology.


F-26


Table of Contents

FIFTH STREET FINANCE CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
The following table provides a roll-forward in the changes in fair value from September 30, 2010 to December 31, 2010, for all investments for which the Company determines fair value using unobservable (Level 3) factors.
 
                                                 
    First
    Second
    Subordinated
    Preferred
    Common
       
    Lien Debt     Lien Debt     Debt     Equity     Equity     Total  
 
Fair value as of September 30, 2010
  $ 416,323,957     $ 137,851,248     $ 4,404,746     $ 2,892,135     $ 2,349,230     $ 563,821,316  
Purchases and other increases
    231,619,326       1,973,839       177,734       1,037,112       3,823,108       238,631,119  
Redemptions, repayments and other decreases
    (7,910,103 )     (54,802,911 )                       (62,713,014 )
Net realized losses
    (13,450,219 )                             (13,450,219 )
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation)
    15,819,437       372,460       (361,081 )     33,993       241,324       16,106,133  
Transfers into (out of) level 3
                                   
                                                 
Fair value as of December 31, 2010
  $ 642,402,398     $ 85,394,636     $ 4,221,399     $ 3,963,240     $ 6,413,662     $ 742,395,335  
                                                 
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) relating to Level 3 assets still held at December 31, 2010 and reported within net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments in the Consolidated Statement of Operations for the three months ended December 31, 2010
  $ 5,559,340     $ 592,361     $ (361,081 )   $ 33,993     $ 241,324     $ 6,065,937  


F-27


Table of Contents

FIFTH STREET FINANCE CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
The following table provides a roll-forward in the changes in fair value from September 30, 2009 to December 31, 2009, for all investments for which the Company determines fair value using unobservable (Level 3) factors.
 
                                                 
    First
    Second
    Subordinated
    Preferred
    Common
       
    Lien Debt     Lien Debt     Debt     Equity     Equity     Total  
 
Fair value as of September 30, 2009
  $ 142,016,942     $ 153,904,458     $     $ 2,889,471     $ 800,266     $ 299,611,137  
Purchases and other increases
    138,819,323       3,387,609                   153,972       142,360,904  
Redemptions, repayments and other decreases
    (1,711,417 )     (4,672,378 )                       (6,383,795 )
Net realized losses
          106,000                         106,000  
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation)
    1,643,654       (470,920 )           (227,648 )     54,208       999,294  
Transfers into (out of) level 3
                                   
                                                 
Fair value as of December 31, 2009
  $ 280,768,502     $ 152,254,769     $     $ 2,661,823     $ 1,008,446     $ 436,693,540  
                                                 
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) relating to Level 3 assets still held at December 31, 2009 and reported within net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments in the Consolidated Statement of Operations for the three months ended December 31, 2009
  $ 1,643,654     $ (712,563 )   $     $ (227,648 )   $ 54,208     $ 757,651  
 
Concurrent with its adoption of ASC 820, effective October 1, 2008, the Company augmented the valuation techniques it uses to estimate the fair value of its debt investments where there is not a readily available market value (Level 3). Prior to October 1, 2008, the Company estimated the fair value of its Level 3 debt investments by first estimating the enterprise value of the portfolio company which issued the debt investment. To estimate the enterprise value of a portfolio company, the Company analyzed various factors, including the portfolio companies historical and projected financial results. Typically, private companies are valued based on multiples of EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization), cash flow, net income, revenues or, in limited instances, book value.
 
In estimating a multiple to use for valuation purposes, the Company looked to private merger and acquisition statistics, discounted public trading multiples or industry practices. In some cases, the best valuation methodology may have been a discounted cash flow analysis based on future projections. If a portfolio company was distressed, a liquidation analysis may have provided the best indication of enterprise value.


F-28


Table of Contents

FIFTH STREET FINANCE CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
If there was adequate enterprise value to support the repayment of the Company’s debt, the fair value of the Level 3 loan or debt security normally corresponded to cost plus the amortized original issue discount unless the borrower’s condition or other factors lead to a determination of fair value at a different amount.
 
Beginning on October 1, 2008, the Company also introduced a bond yield model to value these investments based on the present value of expected cash flows. The significant inputs into the model are market interest rates for debt with similar characteristics and an adjustment for the portfolio company’s credit risk. The credit risk component of the valuation considers several factors including financial performance, business outlook, debt priority and collateral position.
 
The table below summarizes the changes in the Company’s investment portfolio from September 30, 2010 to December 31, 2010.
 
                         
    Debt     Equity     Total  
 
Fair value at September 30, 2010
  $ 558,579,951     $ 5,241,365     $ 563,821,316  
New investments
    233,716,898       4,860,221       238,577,119  
Redemptions/ repayments
    (60,794,114 )           (60,794,114 )
Net accrual of PIK interest income
    (1,965,334 )           (1,965,334 )
Accretion of original issue discount
    388,637             388,637  
Net change in unearned income
    (3,478,325 )           (3,478,325 )
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation)
    15,830,817       275,316       16,106,133  
Net changes from unrealized to realized
    (10,260,097 )           (10,260,097 )
                         
Fair value as of December 31, 2010
  $ 732,018,433     $ 10,376,902     $ 742,395,335  
                         
 
The Company’s off-balance sheet arrangements consisted of $95.3 million and $49.5 million of unfunded commitments to provide debt financing to its portfolio companies or to fund limited partnership interests as of December 31, 2010 and September 30, 2010, respectively. Such commitments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit risk in excess of the amount recognized in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities and are not reflected on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Assets and Liabilities.


F-29


Table of Contents

FIFTH STREET FINANCE CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
A summary of the composition of the unfunded commitments (consisting of revolvers, term loans and limited partnership interests) as of December 31, 2010 and September 30, 2010 is shown in the table below:
 
                 
    December 31, 2010     September 30, 2010  
 
HealthDrive Corporation
  $ 1,500,000     $ 1,500,000  
IZI Medical Products, Inc. 
    2,500,000       2,500,000  
Trans-Trade, Inc. 
    4,000,000       500,000  
Riverlake Equity Partners II, LP (limited partnership interest)
    877,895       966,360  
Riverside Fund IV, LP (limited partnership interest)
    678,583       864,175  
ADAPCO, Inc. 
    5,750,000       5,750,000  
AmBath/ReBath Holdings, Inc. 
    1,500,000       1,500,000  
JTC Education, Inc. 
    14,000,000       9,062,453  
Tegra Medical, LLC
    4,000,000       4,000,000  
Vanguard Vinyl, Inc. 
          1,250,000  
Flatout, Inc. 
    1,500,000       1,500,000  
Psilos Group Partners IV, LP (limited partnership interest)
    1,000,000       1,000,000  
Mansell Group, Inc. 
    2,000,000       2,000,000  
NDSSI Holdings, Inc. 
    1,500,000       1,500,000  
Eagle Hospital Physicians, Inc. 
    2,500,000       2,500,000  
Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC
    4,000,000       3,623,148  
Epic Acquisition, Inc. 
    2,200,000       2,700,000  
Specialty Bakers, LLC
    4,000,000       2,000,000  
Rail Acquisition Corp. 
    5,040,865       4,798,897  
Bunker Hill Capital II (QP), L.P. (limited partnership interest)
    1,000,000        
Nicos Polymers & Grinding Inc. 
    500,000        
CRGT, Inc. 
    12,500,000        
Welocalize, Inc. 
    4,750,000        
Miche Bag, LLC
    5,000,000        
Dominion Diagnostics, LLC
    5,000,000        
Advanced Pain Management
    400,000        
DISA, Inc. 
    4,000,000        
Best Vinyl Fence & Deck, LLC
    1,000,000        
Saddleback Fence and Vinyl Products, Inc. 
    400,000        
Traffic Control & Safety Corporation
    2,250,000        
                 
Total
  $ 95,347,343     $ 49,515,033  
                 


F-30


Table of Contents

FIFTH STREET FINANCE CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
Summaries of the composition of the Company’s investment portfolio at cost and fair value as a percentage of total investments are shown in the following tables:
 
                                 
    December 31, 2010     September 30, 2010  
 
Cost:
                               
First lien debt
  $ 640,609,701       84.85 %   $ 430,200,694       72.61 %
Second lien debt
    96,672,806       12.80 %     150,600,807       25.42 %
Subordinated debt
    5,854,462       0.78 %     4,727,800       0.80 %
Purchased equity
    4,416,468       0.58 %     2,330,305       0.39 %
Equity grants
    6,967,524       0.92 %     4,467,524       0.75 %
Limited partnership interests
    443,522       0.07 %     169,465       0.03 %
                                 
Total
  $ 754,964,483       100.00 %   $ 592,496,595       100.00 %
                                 
Fair Value:
                               
First lien debt
  $ 642,402,398       86.53 %   $ 416,323,957       73.84 %
Second lien debt
    84,295,708       11.35 %     137,851,248       24.45 %
Subordinated debt
    5,320,327       0.72 %     4,404,746       0.78 %
Purchased equity
    2,955,827       0.40 %     625,371       0.11 %
Equity grants
    6,977,553       0.94 %     4,446,529       0.79 %
Limited partnership interests
    443,522       0.06 %     169,465       0.03 %
                                 
Total
  $ 742,395,335       100.00 %   $ 563,821,316       100.00 %
                                 
 
The Company invests in portfolio companies located in the United States. The following tables show the portfolio composition by geographic region at cost and fair value as a percentage of total investments. The geographic composition is determined by the location of the corporate headquarters of the portfolio company, which may not be indicative of the primary source of the portfolio company’s business.
 
                                 
    December 31, 2010     September 30, 2010  
 
Cost:
                               
Northeast
  $ 210,633,806       27.90 %   $ 175,370,861       29.60 %
Southwest
    180,442,847       23.91 %     121,104,464       20.44 %
Southeast
    158,144,424       20.95 %     108,804,931       18.36 %
West
    144,318,593       19.12 %     133,879,457       22.60 %
Midwest
    61,424,813       8.12 %     53,336,882       9.00 %
                                 
Total
  $ 754,964,483       100.00 %   $ 592,496,595       100.00 %
                                 
Fair Value:
                               
Northeast
  $ 208,392,159       28.07 %   $ 161,264,153       28.60 %
Southwest
    167,079,771       22.51 %     107,468,588       19.07 %
Southeast
    160,412,465       21.61 %     109,457,070       19.41 %
West
    143,781,175       19.37 %     131,881,487       23.39 %
Midwest
    62,729,765       8.44 %     53,750,018       9.53 %
                                 
Total
  $ 742,395,335       100.00 %   $ 563,821,316       100.00 %
                                 


F-31


Table of Contents

FIFTH STREET FINANCE CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
The composition of the Company’s portfolio by industry at cost and fair value as of December 31, 2010 and September 30, 2010 were as follows:
 
                                 
    December 31, 2010     September 30, 2010  
 
Cost:
                               
Healthcare services
  $ 150,745,526       19.97 %   $ 87,443,639       14.76 %
IT consulting & other services
    49,804,594       6.60 %           0.00 %
Healthcare equipment
    46,877,049       6.21 %     47,539,596       8.02 %
Education services
    44,774,933       5.93 %     44,901,602       7.58 %
Internet software & services
    39,924,305       5.29 %           0.00 %
Construction and engineering
    39,144,820       5.18 %     24,987,230       4.22 %
Electronic equipment & instruments
    33,018,454       4.37 %     33,094,495       5.59 %
Home improvement retail
    32,587,195       4.32 %     32,630,879       5.51 %
Apparel, accessories & luxury goods
    31,893,000       4.22 %     23,535,757       3.97 %
Food distributors
    28,501,129       3.78 %     30,415,200       5.13 %
Fertilizers & agricultural chemicals
    26,323,523       3.49 %     26,694,525       4.51 %
Diversified support services
    25,699,275       3.40 %     26,246,237       4.43 %
Healthcare technology
    21,360,961       2.83 %     21,509,107       3.63 %
Human resources & employment services
    20,774,104       2.75 %           0.00 %
Food retail
    19,412,498       2.57 %     19,622,414       3.31 %
Electronic manufacturing services
    19,001,589       2.52 %     18,738,072       3.16 %
Media — Advertising
    18,026,733       2.39 %     19,828,343       3.35 %
Air freight and logistics
    17,600,968       2.33 %     14,004,766       2.36 %
Trucking
    17,064,785       2.26 %     17,064,785       2.88 %
Distributors
    13,436,082       1.78 %     13,350,633       2.25 %
Data processing and outsourced services
    13,229,885       1.75 %     13,078,169       2.21 %
Industrial machinery
    10,221,792       1.35 %     10,143,414       1.71 %
Leisure facilities
    6,783,242       0.90 %     6,863,521       1.16 %
Building products
    6,717,698       0.89 %     8,291,678       1.40 %
Construction materials
    6,477,386       0.86 %     17,475,899       2.95 %
Environmental & facilities services
    5,125,321       0.68 %     8,921,676       1.51 %
Housewares & specialties
    4,556,187       0.60 %     12,195,029       2.06 %
Restaurants
    4,138,830       0.55 %     12,485,385       2.11 %
Household products
    1,098,928       0.15 %     1,064,910       0.18 %
Multi-sector holdings
    443,522       0.05 %     169,465       0.02 %
Movies & entertainment
    200,169       0.03 %     200,169       0.03 %
                                 
Total
  $ 754,964,483       100.00 %   $ 592,496,595       100.00 %
                                 
Fair Value:
                               
Healthcare services
  $ 154,124,078       20.76 %   $ 89,261,760       15.83 %
IT consulting & other services
    51,000,000       6.87 %           0.00 %
Healthcare equipment
    47,689,753       6.42 %     48,297,921       8.57 %
Education services
    40,834,373       5.50 %     42,110,738       7.47 %
Internet software & services
    40,766,797       5.49 %           0.00 %


F-32


Table of Contents

FIFTH STREET FINANCE CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
                                 
    December 31, 2010     September 30, 2010  
 
Construction and engineering
    37,725,698       5.08 %     23,844,836       4.23 %
Electronic equipment & instruments
    32,682,427       4.40 %     32,887,767       5.83 %
Apparel, accessories & luxury goods
    32,605,394       4.39 %     23,548,933       4.18 %
Home improvement retail
    32,318,609       4.35 %     32,483,858       5.76 %
Food distributors
    28,529,313       3.84 %     30,316,811       5.38 %
Fertilizers & agricultural chemicals
    26,539,336       3.57 %     26,811,860       4.76 %
Diversified support services
    25,820,525       3.48 %     26,246,237       4.66 %
Healthcare technology
    21,993,525       2.96 %     22,140,613       3.93 %
Human resources & employment services
    21,300,346       2.87 %           0.00 %
Food retail
    19,613,730       2.64 %     19,750,316       3.50 %
Media — Advertising
    18,144,549       2.44 %     19,847,065       3.52 %
Air freight and logistics
    17,835,145       2.40 %     14,040,532       2.49 %
Electronic manufacturing services
    16,639,539       2.24 %     18,055,528       3.20 %
Distributors
    13,415,216       1.81 %     13,258,317       2.35 %
Data processing and outsourced services
    12,796,573       1.72 %     12,741,012       2.26 %
Industrial machinery
    10,657,539       1.44 %     10,232,763       1.81 %
Leisure facilities
    6,973,522       0.94 %     7,040,043       1.25 %
Building products
    6,565,139       0.88 %     6,841,467       1.21 %
Construction materials
    6,477,386       0.87 %     17,039,751       3.02 %
Environmental & facilities services
    5,033,333       0.68 %     5,129,853       0.91 %
Trucking
    4,597,412       0.62 %     4,597,412       0.82 %
Housewares & specialties
    4,055,655       0.55 %     3,700,000       0.66 %
Restaurants
    3,856,360       0.52 %     12,099,935       2.15 %
Household products
    1,098,928       0.15 %     1,064,910       0.19 %
Multi-sector holdings
    443,522       0.08 %     169,465       0.01 %
Movies & entertainment
    261,613       0.04 %     261,613       0.05 %
                                 
Total
  $ 742,395,335       100.00 %   $ 563,821,316       100.00 %
                                 
 
The Company’s investments are generally in small and mid-sized companies in a variety of industries. At December 31, 2010 and September 30, 2010, the Company had no single investment that represented greater than 10% of the total investment portfolio at fair value. Income, consisting of interest, dividends, fees, other investment income, and realization of gains or losses, can fluctuate upon repayment or sale of an investment and in any given year can be highly concentrated among several investments. For the three months ended December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, no individual investment produced income that exceeded 10% of investment income.
 
Note 4.   Fee Income
 
The Company receives a variety of fees in the ordinary course of business. Certain fees, such as origination fees, are capitalized and amortized in accordance with ASC 310-20 Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs . In accordance with ASC 820, the net unearned fee income balance is netted against the cost of the respective investments. Other fees, such as servicing and collateral management fees, are classified as fee income and recognized as they are earned on a monthly basis.

F-33


Table of Contents

FIFTH STREET FINANCE CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
Accumulated unearned fee income activity for the three months ended December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 was as follows:
 
                 
    Three Months Ended
    Three Months Ended
 
    December 31,
    December 31,
 
    2010     2009  
 
Beginning unearned fee income balance
  $ 11,900,871     $ 5,589,630  
Net fees received
    4,706,689       4,861,907  
Unearned fee income recognized
    (1,228,366 )     (915,129 )
                 
Ending unearned fee income balance
  $ 15,379,194     $ 9,536,408  
                 
 
As of December 31, 2010, the Company had structured $7.6 million in aggregate exit fees across 10 portfolio investments upon the future exit of those investments. These fees are to be paid to the Company upon the sooner to occur of (i) a sale of the borrower or substantially all of the assets of the borrower, (ii) the maturity date of the loan, or (iii) the date when full prepayment of the loan occurs. Exit fees are fees which are earned and payable upon the exit of a debt security and, similar to a prepayment penalty, are not accrued or otherwise included in net investment income until received. The receipt of such fees as well the timing of the Company’s receipt of such fees is contingent upon a successful exit event for each of the investments.
 
Note 5.   Share Data
 
Effective January 2, 2008, the Partnership merged with and into the Company. At the time of the merger, all outstanding partnership interests in the Partnership were exchanged for 12,480,972 shares of common stock of the Company. An additional 26 fractional shares were payable to the stockholders in cash.
 
On June 17, 2008, the Company completed an initial public offering of 10,000,000 shares of its common stock at the offering price of $14.12 per share. The net proceeds totaled $129.5 million after deducting investment banking commissions of $9.9 million and offering costs of $1.8 million.
 
On July 21, 2009, the Company completed a follow-on public offering of 9,487,500 shares of its common stock, which included the underwriters’ exercise of their over-allotment option, at the offering price of $9.25 per share. The net proceeds totaled $82.7 million after deducting investment banking commissions of $4.4 million and offering costs of $0.7 million.
 
On September 25, 2009, the Company completed a follow-on public offering of 5,520,000 shares of its common stock, which included the underwriters’ exercise of their over-allotment option, at the offering price of $10.50 per share. The net proceeds totaled $54.9 million after deducting investment banking commissions of $2.8 million and offering costs of $0.3 million.
 
On January 27, 2010, the Company completed a follow-on public offering of 7,000,000 shares of its common stock at the offering price of $11.20 per share, with 300,500 additional shares being sold as part of the underwriters’ partial exercise of their over-allotment option on February 25, 2010. The net proceeds totaled $77.5 million after deducting investment banking commissions of $3.7 million and offering costs of $0.5 million.
 
On April 20, 2010, at the Company’s 2010 Annual Meeting, the Company’s stockholders approved, among other things, amendments to the Company’s restated certificate of incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock from 49,800,000 shares to 150,000,000 shares and to remove the Company’s authority to issue shares of Series A Preferred Stock.
 
On June 21, 2010, the Company completed a follow-on public offering of 9,200,000 shares of its common stock, which included the underwriters’ exercise of their over-allotment option, at the offering price of $11.50 per share. The net proceeds totaled $100.5 million after deducting investment banking commissions of $4.8 million and offering costs of $0.5 million.


F-34


Table of Contents

FIFTH STREET FINANCE CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
On December 7, 2010, the Company entered into an at-the-market equity offering sales agreement relating to shares of its common stock. Throughout the month of December 2010, the Company sold 429,110 shares of its common stock at an average offering price of $11.87 per share. The net proceeds totaled $5.0 million after deducting fees and commissions of $0.1 million. The Company terminated the at-the-market equity offering sales agreement effective January 20, 2011 and did not sell any shares of the Company’s common stock pursuant thereto subsequent to December 31, 2010.
 
No dilutive instruments were outstanding and therefore none were reflected in the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Assets and Liabilities at December 31, 2010. The following table sets forth the weighted average common shares outstanding for computing basic and diluted earnings per common share for the three months ended December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009:
 
                 
    Three Months Ended
    Three Months Ended
 
    December 31,
    December 31,
 
    2010     2009  
 
Weighted average common shares outstanding, basic and diluted
    54,641,164       37,880,435  
                 
 
The following table reflects the dividend distributions per share that the Board of Directors of the Company has declared and the Company has paid, including shares issued under the dividend reinvestment plan (“DRIP”), on its common stock from inception to December 31, 2010:
 
                                                 
    Record
    Payment
    Amount
    Cash
    DRIP Shares
    DRIP Shares
 
Date Declared
  Date     Date     per Share     Distribution     Issued     Value  
 
5/1/2008
    5/19/2008       6/3/2008     $ 0.30     $ 1.9 million       133,317     $ 1.9 million  
8/6/2008
    9/10/2008       9/26/2008       0.31       5.1 million       196,786 (1)     1.9 million  
12/9/2008
    12/19/2008       12/29/2008       0.32       6.4 million       105,326       0.8 million  
12/9/2008
    12/30/2008       1/29/2009       0.33       6.6 million       139,995       0.8 million  
12/18/2008
    12/30/2008       1/29/2009       0.05       1.0 million       21,211       0.1 million  
4/14/2009
    5/26/2009       6/25/2009       0.25       5.6 million       11,776       0.1 million  
8/3/2009
    9/8/2009       9/25/2009       0.25       7.5 million       56,890       0.6 million  
11/12/2009
    12/10/2009       12/29/2009       0.27       9.7 million       44,420       0.5 million  
1/12/2010
    3/3/2010       3/30/2010       0.30       12.9 million       58,689       0.7 million  
5/3/2010
    5/20/2010       6/30/2010       0.32       14.0 million       42,269       0.5 million  
8/2/2010
    9/1/2010       9/29/2010       0.10       5.2 million       25,425       0.3 million  
8/2/2010
    10/6/2010       10/27/2010       0.10       5.5 million       24,850       0.3 million  
8/2/2010
    11/3/2010       11/24/2010       0.11       6.0 million       26,569       0.3 million  
8/2/2010
    12/1/2010       12/29/2010       0.11       6.0 million       28,238       0.3 million  
 
 
(1) Shares were purchased on the open market and distributed.
 
In October 2008, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program to acquire up to $8 million of the Company’s outstanding common stock. Stock repurchases under this program were made through the open market at times and in such amounts as Company management deemed appropriate. The stock repurchase program expired December 2009. In October 2008, the Company repurchased 78,000 shares of common stock on the open market as part of its share repurchase program.
 
In October 2010, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program to acquire up to $20 million of the Company’s outstanding common stock. Stock repurchases under this program are to be made through the open market at times and in such amounts as the Company’s management deems appropriate, provided


F-35


Table of Contents

FIFTH STREET FINANCE CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
it is below the most recently published net asset value per share. The stock repurchase program expires December 31, 2011 and may be limited or terminated by the Board of Directors at any time without prior notice.
 
Note 6.   Lines of Credit
 
On November 16, 2009, Fifth Street Funding, LLC, a consolidated wholly-owned bankruptcy remote, special purpose subsidiary (“Funding”), and the Company entered into a Loan and Servicing Agreement (“Agreement”), with respect to a three-year credit facility (“Wells Fargo facility”) with Wells Fargo, as successor to Wachovia Bank, National Association (“Wachovia”), Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, as administrative agent, each of the additional institutional and conduit lenders party thereto from time to time, and each of the lender agents party thereto from time to time, in the amount of $50 million, with an accordion feature which allowed for potential future expansion of the facility up to $100 million. The facility bore interest at LIBOR plus 4.0% per annum and had a maturity date of November 16, 2012.
 
On May 26, 2010, the Company amended the Wells Fargo facility to expand the borrowing capacity under that facility. Pursuant to the amendment, the Company received an additional $50 million commitment, thereby increasing the size of the facility from $50 million to $100 million, with an accordion feature that allows for potential future expansion of that facility from a total of $100 million up to a total of $150 million. In addition, the interest rate of the Wells Fargo facility was reduced from LIBOR plus 4% per annum to LIBOR plus 3.5% per annum, with no LIBOR floor, and the maturity date of the facility was extended from November 16, 2012 to May 26, 2013. The facility may be extended for up to two additional years upon the mutual consent of Wells Fargo and each of the lender parties thereto.
 
On November 5, 2010, the Company amended the Wells Fargo facility to, among other things, provide for the issuance from time to time of letters of credit for the benefit of the Company’s portfolio companies. The letters of credit are subject to certain restrictions, including a borrowing base limitation and an aggregate sublimit of $15.0 million.
 
In connection with the Wells Fargo facility, the Company concurrently entered into (i) a Purchase and Sale Agreement with Funding, pursuant to which the Company will sell to Funding certain loan assets it has originated or acquired, or will originate or acquire and (ii) a Pledge Agreement with Wells Fargo, pursuant to which the Company pledged all of its equity interests in Funding as security for the payment of Funding’s obligations under the Agreement and other documents entered into in connection with the Wells Fargo facility.
 
The Agreement and related agreements governing the Wells Fargo facility required both Funding and the Company to, among other things (i) make representations and warranties regarding the collateral as well as each of their businesses, (ii) agree to certain indemnification obligations, and (iii) comply with various covenants, servicing procedures, limitations on acquiring and disposing of assets, reporting requirements and other customary requirements for similar credit facilities. The Wells Fargo facility agreements also include usual and customary default provisions such as the failure to make timely payments under the facility, a change in control of Funding, and the failure by Funding or the Company to materially perform under the Agreement and related agreements governing the facility, which, if not complied with, could accelerate repayment under the facility, thereby materially and adversely affecting the Company’s liquidity, financial condition and results of operations. The Company is currently in compliance with all financial covenants under the Wells Fargo facility.
 
The Wells Fargo facility is secured by all of the assets of Funding, and all of the Company’s equity interest in Funding. The Company intends to use the net proceeds of the Wells Fargo facility to fund a portion of its loan origination activities and for general corporate purposes. Each loan origination under the facility is subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions. The Company cannot be assured that Funding will be able to borrow funds under the Wells Fargo facility at any particular time or at all. As of December 31, 2010, the Company had $38.0 million of borrowings outstanding under the Wells Fargo facility.


F-36


Table of Contents

FIFTH STREET FINANCE CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
On May 27, 2010, the Company entered into a three-year secured syndicated revolving credit facility (“ING facility”) pursuant to a Senior Secured Revolving Credit Agreement (“ING Credit Agreement”) with certain lenders party thereto from time to time and ING Capital LLC, as administrative agent. The ING facility allows for the Company to borrow money at a rate of either (i) LIBOR plus 3.5% per annum or (ii) 2.5% per annum plus an alternate base rate based on the greatest of the Prime Rate, Federal Funds Rate plus 0.5% per annum or LIBOR plus 1% per annum, and has a maturity date of May 27, 2013. The ING facility also allows the Company to request letters of credit from ING Capital LLC, as the issuing bank. The initial commitment under the ING facility is $90 million, and the ING facility includes an accordion feature that allows for potential future expansion of the facility up to a total of $150 million. The ING facility is secured by substantially all of the Company’s assets, as well as the assets of two of the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiaries, FSFC Holdings, Inc. and FSF/MP Holdings, Inc., subject to certain exclusions for, among other things, equity interests in the Company’s SBIC subsidiary and equity interests in Funding as further set forth in a Guarantee, Pledge and Security Agreement (“ING Security Agreement”) entered into in connection with the ING Credit Agreement, among FSFC Holdings, Inc., FSF/MP Holdings, Inc., ING Capital LLC, as collateral agent, and the Company. Neither the Company’s SBIC subsidiary nor Funding is party to the ING facility and their respective assets have not been pledged in connection therewith. The ING facility provides that the Company may use the proceeds and letters of credit under the facility for general corporate purposes, including acquiring and funding leveraged loans, mezzanine loans, high-yield securities, convertible securities, preferred stock, common stock and other investments.
 
Pursuant to the ING Security Agreement, FSFC Holdings, Inc. and FSF/MP Holdings, Inc. guaranteed the obligations under the ING Security Agreement, including the Company’s obligations to the lenders and the administrative agent under the ING Credit Agreement. Additionally, the Company pledged its entire equity interests in FSFC Holdings, Inc. and FSF/MP Holdings, Inc. to the collateral agent pursuant to the terms of the ING Security Agreement.
 
The ING Credit Agreement and related agreements governing the ING facility required FSFC Holdings, Inc., FSF/MP Holdings, Inc. and the Company to, among other things (i) make representations and warranties regarding the collateral as well as each of the Company’s businesses, (ii) agree to certain indemnification obligations, and (iii) agree to comply with various affirmative and negative covenants and other customary requirements for similar credit facilities. The ING facility documents also include usual and customary default provisions such as the failure to make timely payments under the facility, the occurrence of a change in control, and the failure by the Company to materially perform under the ING Credit Agreement and related agreements governing the facility, which, if not complied with, could accelerate repayment under the facility, thereby materially and adversely affecting the Company’s liquidity, financial condition and results of operations. The Company is currently in compliance with all financial covenants under the ING facility.
 
Each loan or letter of credit originated under the ING facility is subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions. The Company cannot be assured that it will be able to borrow funds under the ING facility at any particular time or at all.
 
As of December 31, 2010, the Company had $51.0 million of borrowings outstanding under the ING facility.
 
As of December 31, 2010, except for assets that were funded through the Company’s SBIC subsidiary, substantially all of the Company’s assets were pledged as collateral under the Wells Fargo facility or the ING facility.
 
Interest expense for the three months ended December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 was $1.9 million and $0.1 million, respectively.
 
Note 7.   Interest and Dividend Income
 
Interest income is recorded on an accrual basis to the extent that such amounts are expected to be collected. In accordance with the Company’s policy, accrued interest is evaluated periodically for collectability. The Company


F-37


Table of Contents

FIFTH STREET FINANCE CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
stops accruing interest on investments when it is determined that interest is no longer collectible. Distributions from portfolio companies are recorded as dividend income when the distribution is received.
 
The Company holds debt in its portfolio that contains a payment-in-kind (“PIK”) interest provision. The PIK interest, which represents contractually deferred interest added to the loan balance that is generally due at the end of the loan term, is generally recorded on the accrual basis to the extent such amounts are expected to be collected. The Company generally ceases accruing PIK interest if there is insufficient value to support the accrual or if the Company does not expect the portfolio company to be able to pay all principal and interest due. The Company’s decision to cease accruing PIK interest involves subjective judgments and determinations based on available information about a particular portfolio company, including whether the portfolio company is current with respect to its payment of principal and interest on its loans and debt securities; monthly and quarterly financial statements and financial projections for the portfolio company; the Company’s assessment of the portfolio company’s business development success, including product development, profitability and the portfolio company’s overall adherence to its business plan; information obtained by the Company in connection with periodic formal update interviews with the portfolio company’s management and, if appropriate, the private equity sponsor; and information about the general economic and market conditions in which the portfolio company operates. Based on this and other information, the Company determines whether to cease accruing PIK interest on a loan or debt security. The Company’s determination to cease accruing PIK interest on a loan or debt security is generally made well before the Company’s full write-down of such loan or debt security.
 
Accumulated PIK interest activity for the three months ended December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 was as follows:
 
                 
    Three Months Ended
    Three Months Ended
 
    December 31,
    December 31,
 
    2010     2009  
 
PIK balance at beginning of period
  $ 19,300,954     $ 12,059,478  
Gross PIK interest accrued
    3,384,078       2,430,656  
PIK income reserves
    (240,390 )     (468,882 )
PIK interest received in cash
    (5,109,022 )     (525,194 )
Adjustments due to loan exits
          (530,061 )
                 
PIK balance at end of period
  $ 17,335,620     $ 12,965,997  
                 
 
As of December 31, 2010, the Company had stopped accruing cash interest, PIK interest and original issue discount (“OID”) on three investments that did not pay all of their scheduled monthly cash interest payments for the period ended December 31, 2010. As of December 31, 2009, the Company had stopped accruing PIK interest and OID on five investments, including two investments that had not paid all of their scheduled monthly cash interest payments.
 
The non-accrual status of the Company’s portfolio investments as of December 31, 2010, September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 was as follows:
 
                         
    December 31, 2010   September 30, 2010   December 31, 2009
 
Lighting by Gregory, LLC
    Cash non-accrual       Cash non-accrual       Cash non-accrual  
CPAC, Inc. 
                PIK non-accrual  
Martini Park, LLC
                PIK non-accrual  
Nicos Polymers & Grinding, Inc. 
          Cash non-accrual       PIK non-accrual  
MK Network, LLC
    Cash non-accrual       Cash non-accrual        
Premier Trailer Leasing, Inc. 
    Cash non-accrual       Cash non-accrual       Cash non-accrual  
Vanguard Vinyl, Inc. 
          Cash non-accrual        


F-38


Table of Contents

FIFTH STREET FINANCE CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
Income non-accrual amounts for the three months ended December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 were as follows:
 
                 
    Three Months Ended
    Three Months Ended
 
    December 31,
    December 31,
 
    2010     2009  
 
Cash interest income
  $ 2,106,432     $ 1,134,564  
PIK interest income
    240,390       468,882  
OID income
    30,138       103,911  
                 
Total
  $ 2,376,960     $ 1,707,357  
                 
 
Note 8.   Taxable/Distributable Income and Dividend Distributions
 
Taxable income differs from net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations primarily due to: (1) unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments, as investment gains and losses are not included in taxable income until they are realized; (2) origination fees received in connection with investments in portfolio companies, which are amortized into interest income over the life of the investment for book purposes, are treated as taxable income upon receipt; (3) organizational and deferred offering costs; (4) recognition of interest income on certain loans; and (5) income or loss recognition on exited investments.
 
At September 30, 2010, the Company has a net loss carryforward of $1.5 million to offset net capital gains, to the extent provided by federal tax law. The capital loss carryforward will expire in the Company’s tax year ending September 30, 2017. During the year ended September 30, 2010, the Company realized capital losses from the sale of investments after October 31 and prior to year end (“post-October capital losses”) of $12.9 million, which for tax purposes are treated as arising on the first day of the following year.
 
Listed below is a reconciliation of “net increase in net assets resulting from operations” to taxable income for the three months ended December 31, 2010.
 
         
    Three Months Ended
 
    December 31,
 
    2010  
 
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations
  $ 17,448,000  
Net unrealized appreciation
    (16,843,000 )
Book/tax difference due to deferred loan origination fees, net
    3,478,000  
Book/tax difference due to organizational and deferred offering costs
    (22,000 )
Book/tax difference due to interest income on certain loans
    1,051,000  
Book/tax difference due to capital losses not recognized
    13,450,000  
Other book-tax differences
    131,000  
         
Taxable/Distributable Income(1)
  $ 18,693,000  
         
 
 
(1) The Company’s taxable income for 2011 is an estimate and will not be finally determined until the Company files its tax return for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011. Therefore, the final taxable income may be different than the estimate.
 
Distributions to stockholders are recorded on the record date. The Company is required to distribute annually to its stockholders at least 90% of its net ordinary income and net realized short-term capital gains in excess of net realized long-term capital losses for each taxable year in order to be eligible for the tax benefits allowed to a RIC under Subchapter M of the Code. The Company anticipates paying out as a dividend all or substantially all of those amounts. The amount to be paid out as a dividend is determined by the Board of Directors and is based on


F-39


Table of Contents

FIFTH STREET FINANCE CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
management’s estimate of the Company’s annual taxable income. The Company maintains an “opt out” dividend reinvestment plan for its stockholders.
 
To date, the Company’s Board of Directors declared the following distributions:
 
                                     
                Amount
Dividend Type
  Date Declared   Record Date   Payment Date   per Share
 
 
Quarterly
      5/1/2008       5/19/2008       6/3/2008     $ 0.30  
 
Quarterly
      8/6/2008       9/10/2008       9/26/2008     $ 0.31  
 
Quarterly
      12/9/2008       12/19/2008       12/29/2008     $ 0.32  
 
Quarterly
      12/9/2008       12/30/2008       1/29/2009     $ 0.33  
 
Special
      12/18/2008       12/30/2008       1/29/2009     $ 0.05  
 
Quarterly
      4/14/2009       5/26/2009       6/25/2009     $ 0.25  
 
Quarterly
      8/3/2009       9/8/2009       9/25/2009     $ 0.25  
 
Quarterly
      11/12/2009       12/10/2009       12/29/2009     $ 0.27  
 
Quarterly
      1/12/2010       3/3/2010       3/30/2010     $ 0.30  
 
Quarterly
      5/3/2010       5/20/2010       6/30/2010     $ 0.32  
 
Quarterly
      8/2/2010       9/1/2010       9/29/2010     $ 0.10  
 
Monthly
      8/2/2010       10/6/2010       10/27/2010     $ 0.10  
 
Monthly
      8/2/2010       11/3/2010       11/24/2010     $ 0.11  
 
Monthly
      8/2/2010       12/1/2010       12/29/2010     $ 0.11  
 
Monthly
      11/30/2010       1/4/2011       1/31/2011     $ 0.1066  
 
Monthly
      11/30/2010       2/1/2011       2/28/2011     $ 0.1066  
 
Monthly
      11/30/2010       3/1/2011       3/31/2011     $ 0.1066  
 
For income tax purposes, the Company estimates that its distributions will be composed entirely of ordinary income, and will be reflected as such on the Form 1099-DIV for the calendar years 2010 and 2011. The Company anticipates declaring further distributions to its stockholders to meet the RIC distribution requirements.
 
As a RIC, the Company is also subject to a federal excise tax based on distributive requirements of its taxable income on a calendar year basis. Because the Company did not satisfy these distribution requirements for calendar years 2008 and 2009, the Company incurred a de minimis federal excise tax for those calendar years, and the Company expects to incur a de minimis federal excise tax for the calendar year 2010.
 
Note 9.   Realized Gains or Losses from Investments and Net Change in Unrealized Appreciation or Depreciation from Investments
 
Realized gains or losses are measured by the difference between the net proceeds from the sale or redemption and the cost basis of the investment without regard to unrealized appreciation or depreciation previously recognized, and includes investments written-off during the period, net of recoveries. Realized losses may also be recorded in connection with the Company’s determination that certain investments are considered worthless securities and/or meet the conditions for loss recognition per the applicable tax rules. Net change in unrealized appreciation or depreciation from investments reflects the net change in the valuation of the portfolio pursuant to the Company’s valuation guidelines and the reclassification of any prior period unrealized appreciation or depreciation on exited investments.


F-40


Table of Contents

FIFTH STREET FINANCE CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
During the three months ended December 31, 2010, the Company recorded the following investment realization events:
 
  •  In October 2010, the Company received a cash payment of $8.7 million from Goldco, Inc. in full satisfaction of all obligations under the loan agreement. The debt investment was exited at par and no realized gain or loss was recorded on this transaction;
 
  •  In November 2010, the Company received a cash payment of $11.0 million from TBA Global, LLC in full satisfaction of all obligations under the loan agreement. The debt investment was exited at par and no realized gain or loss was recorded on this transaction;
 
  •  In November 2010, the Company restructured its investment in Vanguard Vinyl, Inc. The restructuring resulted in a material modification of the terms of the loan agreement. As such, the Company recorded a realized loss in the amount of $1.7 million in accordance with ASC 470-50;
 
  •  In December 2010, the Company restructured its investment in Nicos Polymers & Grinding, Inc. The restructuring resulted in a material modification of the terms of the loan agreement. As such, the Company recorded a realized loss in the amount of $3.9 million in accordance with ASC 470-50;
 
  •  In December 2010, the Company received a cash payment of $25.3 million from Boot Barn in full satisfaction of all obligations under the loan agreement. The debt investment was exited at par and no realized gain or loss was recorded on this transaction;
 
  •  In December 2010, the Company received a cash payment of $11.7 million from Western Emulsions, Inc. in partial satisfaction of the obligations under the loan agreement. No realized gain or loss was recorded on this transaction; and
 
  •  In December 2010, the Company restructured its investment in Lighting by Gregory, LLC. The restructuring resulted in a material modification of the terms of the loan agreement. As such, the Company recorded a realized loss in the amount of $7.8 million in accordance with ASC 470-50.
 
During the three months ended December 31, 2009, the Company recorded the following investment realization events:
 
  •  In October 2009, the Company received a cash payment in the amount of $0.1 million representing a payment in full of all amounts due in connection with the cancellation of its loan agreement with American Hardwoods Industries, LLC. The Company recorded a $0.1 million reduction to the previously recorded $10.4 million realized loss on the investment in American Hardwoods; and
 
  •  In October 2009, the Company received a cash payment of $3.9 million from Elephant & Castle, Inc. in partial satisfaction of the obligations under the loan agreement. No realized gain or loss was recorded on this transaction.
 
Note 10.   Concentration of Credit Risks
 
The Company places its cash in financial institutions and at times such balances may be in excess of the FDIC insured limit. The Company limits its exposure to credit loss by depositing its cash with high credit quality financial institutions and monitoring their financial stability.
 
Note 11.   Related Party Transactions
 
The Company has entered into an investment advisory agreement with the Investment Adviser. Under the investment advisory agreement, the Company pays the Investment Adviser a fee for its services under the investment advisory agreement consisting of two components — a base management fee and an incentive fee.


F-41


Table of Contents

FIFTH STREET FINANCE CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
Base management Fee
 
The base management fee is calculated at an annual rate of 2% of the Company’s gross assets, which includes any borrowings for investment purposes. The base management fee is payable quarterly in arrears, and will be calculated based on the value of the Company’s gross assets at the end of each fiscal quarter, and appropriately adjusted on a pro rata basis for any equity capital raises or repurchases during such quarter. The base management fee for any partial month or quarter will be appropriately prorated.
 
On January 6, 2010, the Company announced that the Investment Adviser had voluntarily agreed to take the following actions:
 
  •  To waive the portion of its base management fee for the quarter ended December 31, 2009 attributable to four new portfolio investments, as well as cash and cash equivalents. The amount of the management fee waived was $727,000; and
 
  •  To permanently waive that portion of its base management fee attributable to the Company’s assets held in the form of cash and cash equivalents as of the end of each quarter beginning March 31, 2010.
 
For purposes of the waiver, cash and cash equivalents is as defined in the notes to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.
 
For the three months ended December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, base management fees were $3.8 million, and $1.5 million, respectively. At December 31, 2010, the Company had a liability on its Consolidated Statement of Assets and Liabilities in the amount of $3.8 million reflecting the unpaid portion of the base management fee payable to the Investment Adviser.
 
Incentive Fee
 
The incentive fee portion of the investment advisory agreement has two parts. The first part is calculated and payable quarterly in arrears based on the Company’s “Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income” for the immediately preceding fiscal quarter. For this purpose, “Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income” means interest income, dividend income and any other income (including any other fees (other than fees for providing managerial assistance), such as commitment, origination, structuring, diligence and consulting fees or other fees that the Company receives from portfolio companies) accrued during the fiscal quarter, minus the Company’s operating expenses for the quarter (including the base management fee, expenses payable under the Company’s administration agreement with FSC, Inc., and any interest expense and dividends paid on any issued and outstanding indebtedness or preferred stock, but excluding the incentive fee). Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income includes, in the case of investments with a deferred interest feature (such as original issue discount, debt instruments with PIK interest and zero coupon securities), accrued income that the Company has not yet received in cash. Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income does not include any realized capital gains, realized capital losses or unrealized capital appreciation or depreciation. Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income, expressed as a rate of return on the value of the Company’s net assets at the end of the immediately preceding fiscal quarter, will be compared to a “hurdle rate” of 2% per quarter (8% annualized), subject to a “catch-up” provision measured as of the end of each fiscal quarter. The Company’s net investment income used to calculate this part of the incentive fee is also included in the amount of its gross assets used to calculate the 2% base management fee. The operation of the incentive fee with respect to the Company’s Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income for each quarter is as follows:
 
  •  No incentive fee is payable to the Investment Adviser in any fiscal quarter in which the Company’s Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income does not exceed the hurdle rate of 2% (the “preferred return” or “hurdle”);
 
  •  100% of the Company’s Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income with respect to that portion of such Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income, if any, that exceeds the hurdle rate but is less than or equal to 2.5% in any fiscal quarter (10% annualized) is payable to the Investment Adviser. The Company refers to this portion


F-42


Table of Contents

FIFTH STREET FINANCE CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
  of its Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income (which exceeds the hurdle rate but is less than or equal to 2.5%) as the “catch-up.” The “catch-up” provision is intended to provide the Investment Adviser with an incentive fee of 20% on all of the Company’s Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income as if a hurdle rate did not apply when the Company’s Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income exceeds 2.5% in any fiscal quarter; and
 
  •  20% of the amount of the Company’s Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income, if any, that exceeds 2.5% in any fiscal quarter (10% annualized) is payable to the Investment Adviser once the hurdle is reached and the catch-up is achieved (20% of all Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income thereafter is allocated to the Investment Adviser).
 
The second part of the incentive fee is determined and payable in arrears as of the end of each fiscal year (or upon termination of the investment advisory agreement, as of the termination date), commencing on September 30, 2008, and equals 20% of the Company’s realized capital gains, if any, on a cumulative basis from inception through the end of each fiscal year, computed net of all realized capital losses and unrealized capital depreciation on a cumulative basis, less the aggregate amount of any previously paid capital gain incentive fees.
 
For the three months ended December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, incentive fees were $3.5 million and $2.1 million, respectively. At December 31, 2010, the Company had a liability on its Consolidated Statement of Assets and Liabilities in the amount of $3.5 million reflecting the unpaid portion of the incentive fee payable to the Investment Adviser.
 
Indemnification
 
The investment advisory agreement provides that, absent willful misfeasance, bad faith or gross negligence in the performance of their respective duties or by reason of the reckless disregard of their respective duties and obligations, the Company’s Investment Adviser and its officers, managers, agents, employees, controlling persons, members (or their owners) and any other person or entity affiliated with it, are entitled to indemnification from the Company for any damages, liabilities, costs and expenses (including reasonable attorneys’ fees and amounts reasonably paid in settlement) arising from the rendering of the Investment Adviser’s services under the investment advisory agreement or otherwise as the Company’s Investment Adviser.
 
Administration Agreement
 
The Company has also entered into an administration agreement with FSC, Inc. under which FSC, Inc. provides administrative services for the Company, including office facilities and equipment, and clerical, bookkeeping and recordkeeping services at such facilities. Under the administration agreement, FSC, Inc. also performs or oversees the performance of the Company’s required administrative services, which includes being responsible for the financial records which the Company is required to maintain and preparing reports to the Company’s stockholders and reports filed with the SEC. In addition, FSC, Inc. assists the Company in determining and publishing the Company’s net asset value, overseeing the preparation and filing of the Company’s tax returns and the printing and dissemination of reports to the Company’s stockholders, and generally overseeing the payment of the Company’s expenses and the performance of administrative and professional services rendered to the Company by others. For providing these services, facilities and personnel, the Company reimburses FSC, Inc. the allocable portion of overhead and other expenses incurred by FSC, Inc. in performing its obligations under the administration agreement, including rent and the Company’s allocable portion of the costs of compensation and related expenses of the Company’s chief financial officer and chief compliance officer and their staffs. FSC, Inc. has voluntarily determined to forgo receiving reimbursement for the services performed for the Company by its chief compliance officer. However, although FSC, Inc. currently intends to forgo its right to receive such reimbursement, it is under no obligation to do so and may cease to do so at any time in the future. FSC, Inc. may also provide, on the Company’s behalf, managerial assistance to the Company’s portfolio companies. The administration agreement may be terminated by either party without penalty upon 60 days’ written notice to the other party.


F-43


Table of Contents

FIFTH STREET FINANCE CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
For the three months ended December 31, 2010, the Company accrued administrative expenses of $0.8 million, including $0.4 million of general and administrative expenses, that are due to FSC, Inc. At December 31, 2010, $1.3 million was included in Due to FSC, Inc. in the Consolidated Statement of Assets and Liabilities.
 
Note 12.   Financial Highlights
 
                 
    Three Months Ended
  Three Months Ended
    December 31,
  December 31,
    2010   2009
 
Per Share Data:
               
Net asset value at beginning of period
  $ 10.43     $ 10.84  
Net investment income
    0.26       0.22  
Net unrealized appreciation on investments and interest rate swap
    0.31       0.03  
Net realized loss on investments
    (0.24 )      
Dividends declared
    (0.32 )     (0.27 )
Issuance of common stock
           
Net asset value at end of period
  $ 10.44     $ 10.82  
Per share market value at beginning of period
  $ 11.14     $ 10.93  
Per share market value at end of period
  $ 12.14     $ 10.74  
Total return(1)
    11.93 %     0.68 %
Common shares outstanding at beginning of period
    54,550,290       37,878,987  
Common shares outstanding at end of period
    55,059,057       37,923,407  
Net assets at beginning of period
  $ 569,172,105     $ 410,556,071  
Net assets at end of period
  $ 574,921,159     $ 410,257,351  
Average net assets(2)
  $ 572,151,947     $ 409,840,589  
Ratio of net investment income to average net assets(3)
    9.75 %     8.08 %
Ratio of total expenses to average net assets(3)
    7.82 %     4.74 %
Ratio of portfolio turnover to average investments at fair value
    2.17 %     0.00 %
Weighted average outstanding debt(4)
  $ 102,678,261     $ 500,000  
Average debt per share
  $ 1.86     $ 0.01  
 
 
(1) Total return equals the increase or decrease of ending market value over beginning market value, plus distributions, divided by the beginning market value, assuming dividend reinvestment prices obtained under the Company’s dividend reinvestment plan. Total return is not annualized.
 
(2) Calculated based upon the daily weighted average net assets for the period.
 
(3) Interim periods are annualized.
 
(4) Calculated based upon the daily weighted average of loans payable for the period.
 
Note 13.   Preferred Stock
 
The Company’s restated certificate of incorporation had not authorized any shares of preferred stock. However, on April 4, 2008, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a certificate of amendment to its restated certificate of incorporation reclassifying 200,000 shares of its common stock as shares of non-convertible, non-participating preferred stock, with a par value of $0.01 and a liquidation preference of $500 per share (“Series A Preferred Stock”) and authorizing the issuance of up to 200,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock. A certificate of amendment was also approved by the holders of a majority of the shares of the Company’s outstanding common stock through a written consent first solicited on April 7, 2008.


F-44


Table of Contents

FIFTH STREET FINANCE CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
On April 20, 2010, at the Company’s 2010 Annual Meeting, the Company’s stockholders approved, among other things, amendments to the Company’s restated certificate of incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock from 49,800,000 shares to 150,000,000 shares and to remove the Company’s authority to issue shares of Series A Preferred Stock.
 
Note 14.   Interest Rate Swaps
 
In August 2010, the Company entered into a three-year interest rate swap agreement to mitigate its exposure to adverse fluctuations in interest rates for a total notional amount of $100.0 million. Under the interest rate swap agreement, the Company will pay a fixed interest rate of 0.99% and receive a floating rate based on the prevailing one-month LIBOR, which as of December 31, 2010 was 0.26%. For the three months ended December 31, 2010, the Company recorded $0.7 million of unrealized appreciation related to this swap agreement. As of December 31, 2010, this swap agreement had a fair value of ($37,000), which is included in “accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities” in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Assets and Liabilities.
 
As of December 31, 2010, the Company posted $1.5 million of cash as collateral with respect to the interest rate swap. The Company is restricted in terms of access to this collateral until such swap is terminated or the swap agreement expires. Cash collateral posted is held in an account at Wells Fargo.
 
Swaps contain varying degrees of off-balance sheet risk which could result from changes in the market values of underlying assets, indices or interest rates and similar items. As a result, the amounts recognized in the Consolidated Statement of Assets and Liabilities at any given date may not reflect the total amount of potential losses that the Company could ultimately incur.


F-45


Table of Contents

 
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Fifth Street Finance Corp.:
 
In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated statement of assets and liabilities, including the consolidated schedule of investments, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in net assets and cash flows, present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Fifth Street Finance Corp. (“the Company”) at September 30, 2010, and the results of its operations, the changes in its net assets and its cash flows for the year ended September 30, 2010, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In addition, in our opinion, the financial statement schedule listed in the index appearing under Item 15(2) presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2010, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company’s management is responsible for these financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting appearing on page 119 of the annual report to stockholders. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our integrated audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit of the financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
 
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
 
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
 
/s/  PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
New York, New York
December 1, 2010


F-46


Table of Contents

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
Board of Directors and Stockholders of
  Fifth Street Finance Corp.
 
We have audited the accompanying consolidated statement of assets and liabilities, including the consolidated schedule of investments, of Fifth Street Finance Corp. (a Delaware corporation) (the “Company”) as of September 30, 2009, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in net assets, and cash flows and the financial highlights (included in Note 12) for the years ended September 30, 2009 and 2008. Our audits of the basic financial statements included the Schedule of Investments In and Advances to Affiliates. These financial statements, financial highlights and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
 
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our procedures included physical inspection or confirmation of securities owned as of September 30, 2009. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
 
In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Fifth Street Finance Corp. as of September 30, 2009, and the results of its operations, changes in net assets and its cash flows and financial highlights for the years ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.
 
/s/  GRANT THORNTON LLP
New York, New York
December 9, 2009


F-47


Table of Contents

Fifth Street Finance Corp.
 
Consolidated Statement of Assets and Liabilities
 
                 
    September 30,
    September 30,
 
    2010     2009  
 
ASSETS
Investments at Fair Value:
               
Control investments (cost September 30, 2010: $12,195,029; cost September 30, 2009: $12,045,029)
  $ 3,700,000     $ 5,691,107  
Affiliate investments (cost September 30, 2010: $50,133,521; cost September 30, 2009: $71,212,035)
    47,222,059       64,748,560  
Non-control/Non-affiliate investments (cost September 30, 2010: $530,168,045; cost September 30, 2009: $243,975,221)
    512,899,257       229,171,470  
                 
Total Investments at Fair Value (cost September 30, 2010: $592,496,595; cost September 30, 2009: $327,232,285)
    563,821,316       299,611,137  
Cash and cash equivalents
    76,765,254       113,205,287  
Interest and fees receivable
    3,813,757       2,866,991  
Due from portfolio company
    103,426       154,324  
Deferred financing costs
    5,465,964        
Collateral posted to bank and other assets
    1,956,013       49,609  
                 
Total Assets
  $ 651,925,730     $ 415,887,348  
                 
 
LIABILITIES AND NET ASSETS
Liabilities:
               
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities
  $ 1,322,282     $ 723,856  
Base management fee payable
    2,875,802       1,552,160  
Incentive fee payable
    2,859,139       1,944,263  
Due to FSC, Inc. 
    1,083,038       703,900  
Interest payable
    282,640        
Payments received in advance from portfolio companies
    1,330,724       190,378  
Offering costs payable
          216,720  
SBA debentures payable
    73,000,000        
                 
Total Liabilities
    82,753,625       5,331,277  
                 
Net Assets:
               
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 150,000,000 shares authorized, 54,550,290 and 37,878,987 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009
    545,503       378,790  
Additional paid-in-capital
    619,759,984       439,989,597  
Net unrealized depreciation on investments and interest rate swap
    (29,448,713 )     (27,621,147 )
Net realized loss on investments
    (33,090,961 )     (14,310,713 )
Accumulated undistributed net investment income
    11,406,292       12,119,544  
                 
Total Net Assets
    569,172,105       410,556,071  
                 
Total Liabilities and Net Assets
  $ 651,925,730     $ 415,887,348  
                 
 
See notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


F-48


Table of Contents

Fifth Street Finance Corp.
 
Consolidated Statements of Operations
 
                         
    Year
    Year
    Year
 
    Ended
    Ended
    Ended
 
    September 30,
    September 30,
    September 30,
 
    2010     2009     2008  
Interest income:
                       
Control investments
  $ 182,827     $     $  
Affiliate investments
    7,619,018       10,632,844       8,804,543  
Non-control/Non-affiliate investments
    46,089,945       27,931,097       16,800,945  
Interest on cash and cash equivalents
    237,557       208,824       750,605  
                         
Total interest income
    54,129,347       38,772,765       26,356,093  
                         
PIK interest income:
                       
Control investments
                 
Affiliate investments
    1,227,133       1,634,116       1,539,934  
Non-control/Non-affiliate investments
    8,776,935       5,821,173       3,357,464  
                         
Total PIK interest income
    10,004,068       7,455,289       4,897,398  
                         
Fee income:
                       
Control investments
                 
Affiliate investments
    1,433,206       1,101,656       702,463  
Non-control/Non-affiliate investments
    4,537,837       2,440,538       1,105,576  
                         
Total fee income
    5,971,043       3,542,194       1,808,039  
                         
Dividend and other income:
                       
Control investments
                 
Affiliate investments
                26,740  
Non-control/Non-affiliate investments
    433,317       22,791       130,971  
Other income
          35,396        
                         
Total dividend and other income
    433,317       58,187       157,711  
                         
Total investment income
    70,537,775       49,828,435       33,219,241  
                         
Expenses:
                       
Base management fee
    10,002,326       6,060,690       4,258,334  
Incentive fee
    10,756,040       7,840,579       4,117,554  
Professional fees
    1,348,908       1,492,554       1,389,541  
Board of Directors fees
    278,418       310,250       249,000  
Organizational costs
                200,747  
Interest expense
    1,929,389       636,901       917,043  
Administrator expense
    1,321,546       796,898       978,387  
Line of credit guarantee expense
                83,333  
Transaction fees
                206,726  
General and administrative expenses
    2,604,051       1,500,197       674,360  
                         
Total expenses
    28,240,678       18,638,069       13,075,025  
Base management fee waived
    (727,067 )     (171,948 )      
                         
Net expenses
    27,513,611       18,466,121       13,075,025  
                         
Net investment income
    43,024,164       31,362,314       20,144,216  
Unrealized depreciation on interest rate swap
    (773,435 )            
                         
Unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments:
                       
Control investments
    (2,141,107 )     (1,792,015 )      
Affiliate investments
    3,294,482       286,190       (10,570,012 )
Non-control/Non-affiliate investments
    (2,207,506 )     (9,289,492 )     (6,378,755 )
                         
Net unrealized depreciation on investments
    (1,054,131 )     (10,795,317 )     (16,948,767 )
                         
Realized gain (loss) on investments:
                       
Control investments
                 
Affiliate investments
    (6,937,100 )     (4,000,000 )      
Non-control/Non-affiliate investments
    (11,843,148 )     (10,373,200 )     62,487  
                         
Total realized gain (loss) on investments
    (18,780,248 )     (14,373,200 )     62,487  
                         
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations
  $ 22,416,350     $ 6,193,797     $ 3,257,936  
                         
Net Investment Income per common share — basic and diluted(1)
  $ 0.95     $ 1.27     $ 1.29  
                         
Earnings per common share — basic and diluted(1)
  $ 0.49     $ 0.25     $ 0.21  
                         
Weighted average common shares — basic and diluted
    45,440,584       24,654,325       15,557,469  
 
 
(1) The earnings and net investment income per share calculations for the year ended September 30, 2008 are based on the assumption that if the number of shares issued at the time of the merger on January 2, 2008 (12,480,972 shares of common stock) had been issued at the beginning of the fiscal year on October 1, 2007, the Company’s earnings and net investment income per share would have been $0.21 and $1.29 per share, respectively.
 
See notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


F-49


Table of Contents

Fifth Street Finance Corp.
 
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Net Assets
 
                         
    Year Ended
    Year Ended
    Year Ended
 
    September 30,
    September 30,
    September 30,
 
    2010     2009     2008  
 
Operations:
                       
Net investment income
  $ 43,024,164     $ 31,362,314     $ 20,144,216  
Net unrealized depreciation on investments and interest rate swap
    (1,827,566 )     (10,795,317 )     (16,948,767 )
Net realized gain (loss) on investments
    (18,780,248 )     (14,373,200 )     62,487  
                         
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations
    22,416,350       6,193,797       3,257,936  
                         
Stockholder transactions:
                       
Distributions to stockholders from net investment income
    (43,737,416 )     (29,591,657 )     (10,754,721 )
                         
Net decrease in net assets from stockholder transactions
    (43,737,416 )     (29,591,657 )     (10,754,721 )
                         
Capital share transactions:
                       
Issuance of preferred stock
                15,000,000  
Issuance of common stock, net
    178,017,945       137,625,075       129,448,456  
Issuance of common stock under dividend reinvestment plan
    1,919,155       2,455,499       1,882,200  
Redemption of preferred stock
                (15,000,000 )
Repurchases of common stock
          (462,482 )      
Issuance of common stock upon conversion of partnership interests
                169,420,000  
Redemption of partnership interest for common stock
                (169,420,000 )
Fractional shares paid to partners from conversion
                (358 )
Capital contributions from partners
                66,497,000  
Capital withdrawals by partners
                (2,810,369 )
                         
Net increase in net assets from capital share transactions
    179,937,100       139,618,092       195,016,929  
                         
Total increase in net assets
    158,616,034       116,220,232       187,520,144  
Net assets at beginning of period
    410,556,071       294,335,839       106,815,695  
                         
Net assets at end of period
  $ 569,172,105     $ 410,556,071     $ 294,335,839  
                         
Net asset value per common share
  $ 10.43     $ 10.84     $ 13.02  
                         
Common shares outstanding at end of period
    54,550,290       37,878,987       22,614,289  
 
See notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


F-50


Table of Contents

Fifth Street Finance Corp.
 
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
 
                         
    Year Ended
    Year Ended
    Year Ended
 
    September 30,
    September 30,
    September 30,
 
    2010     2009     2008  
 
Cash flows from operating activities:
                       
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations
  $ 22,416,350     $ 6,193,797     $ 3,257,936  
Net unrealized depreciation on investments and interest rate swap
    1,827,566       10,795,317       16,948,767  
Net realized (gains) losses on investments
    18,780,248       14,373,200       (62,487 )
PIK interest income
    (10,004,068 )     (7,455,289 )     (4,897,398 )
Recognition of fee income
    (5,971,043 )     (3,542,194 )     (1,808,039 )
Accretion of original issue discount on investments
    (893,077 )     (842,623 )     (954,436 )
Amortization of deferred financing costs
    798,492              
Other income
          (35,396 )      
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
                       
PIK interest income received in cash
    1,618,762       428,140       114,412  
Fee income received
    11,882,094       3,895,559       5,478,011  
Increase in interest receivable
    (946,766 )     (499,185 )     (1,613,183 )
(Increase) decrease in due from portfolio company
    50,898       (73,561 )     46,952  
Decrease in prepaid management fees
                252,586  
Increase in collateral posted to bank and other assets
    (1,906,404 )     (14,903 )     (34,706 )
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities
    (176,705 )     156,170       150,584  
Increase in base management fee payable
    1,323,642       170,948       1,381,212  
Increase in incentive fee payable
    914,876       130,250       1,814,013  
Increase in due to FSC, Inc. 
    379,138       129,798       574,102  
Increase (decrease) in interest payable
    282,640       (38,750 )     28,816  
Increase in payments received in advance from portfolio companies
    1,140,346       56,641       133,737  
Purchase of investments
    (325,527,419 )     (61,950,000 )     (202,402,611 )
Proceeds from the sale of investments
    306,178       144,000       62,487  
Principal payments received on investments (scheduled repayments and revolver paydowns)
    21,776,331       6,951,902       2,152,992  
Principal payments received on investments (payoffs)
    22,767,681       11,350,000        
                         
Net cash used in operating activities
    (239,160,240 )     (19,676,179 )     (179,376,253 )
                         
Cash flows from financing activities:
                       
Dividends paid in cash
    (41,818,261 )     (27,136,158 )     (8,872,521 )
Repurchases of common stock
          (462,482 )      
Capital contributions
                66,497,000  
Capital withdrawals
                (2,810,369 )
Borrowings under SBA debentures payable
    73,000,000              
Borrowings under credit facilities
    43,000,000       29,500,000       79,250,000  
Repayments of borrowings under credit facilities
    (43,000,000 )     (29,500,000 )     (79,250,000 )
Proceeds from the issuance of common stock
    179,125,148       138,578,307       131,316,000  
Proceeds from the issuance of mandatorily redeemable preferred stock
                15,000,000  
Redemption of preferred stock
                (15,000,000 )
Deferred financing costs paid
    (6,264,457 )            
Offering costs paid
    (1,322,223 )     (1,004,577 )     (1,501,179 )
Redemption of partnership interests for cash
                (358 )
                         
Net cash provided by financing activities
    202,720,207       109,975,090       184,628,573  
                         
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
    (36,440,033 )     90,298,911       5,252,320  
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
    113,205,287       22,906,376       17,654,056  
                         
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
  $ 76,765,254     $ 113,205,287     $ 22,906,376  
                         
Supplemental Information:
                       
Cash paid for interest
  $ 848,257     $ 425,651     $ 888,227  
Non-cash financing activities:
                       
Issuance of shares of common stock under dividend reinvestment plan
  $ 1,919,155     $ 2,455,499     $ 1,882,200  
Reinvested shares of common stock under dividend reinvestment plan
  $     $     $ (1,882,200 )
Redemption of partnership interests
  $     $     $ (173,699,632 )
Issuance of shares of common stock in exchange for partnership interests
  $     $     $ 173,699,632  
 
See notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


F-51


Table of Contents

Fifth Street Finance Corp.
 
Consolidated Schedule of Investments
September 30, 2010
 
                             
Portfolio Company/Type of Investment(1)(2)(5)
 
Industry
  Principal(8)     Cost     Fair Value  
 
Control Investments(3)
                           
Lighting By Gregory, LLC(13)(14)
  Housewares &
Specialties
                       
First Lien Term Loan A, 9.75% due 2/28/2013
      $ 5,419,495     $ 4,728,589     $ 1,503,716  
First Lien Term Loan B, 14.5% due 2/28/2013
        8,575,783       6,906,440       2,196,284  
First Lien Bridge Loan, 8% due 10/15/2010
        152,312       150,000        
97.38% membership interest
                410,000        
                             
                  12,195,029       3,700,000  
                             
Total Control Investments
              $ 12,195,029     $ 3,700,000  
                             
Affiliate Investments(4)
                           
O’Currance, Inc. 
  Data Processing
& Outsourced
Services
                       
First Lien Term Loan A, 16.875% due 3/21/2012
        10,961,448     $ 10,869,262     $ 10,805,775  
First Lien Term Loan B, 16.875%, 3/21/2012
        1,853,976       1,828,494       1,896,645  
1.75% Preferred Membership interest in O’Currance Holding Co., LLC
                130,413       38,592  
3.3% Membership Interest in O’Currance Holding Co., LLC
                250,000        
                             
                  13,078,169       12,741,012  
MK Network, LLC(13)(14)
  Education
services
                       
First Lien Term Loan A, 13.5% due 6/1/2012
        9,740,358       9,539,188       7,913,140  
First Lien Term Loan B, 17.5% due 6/1/2012
        4,926,187       4,748,004       3,938,660  
First Lien Revolver, Prime + 1.5% (10% floor), due 6/1/2010(10)
                     
11,030 Membership Units(6)
                771,575        
                             
                  15,058,767       11,851,800  
Caregiver Services, Inc. 
  Healthcare
services
                       
Second Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+6.85% (12% floor) due 2/25/2013
        7,141,190       6,813,431       7,113,622  
Second Lien Term Loan B, 16.5% due 2/25/2013
        14,692,015       14,102,756       14,179,626  
1,080,399 shares of Series A Preferred Stock
                1,080,398       1,335,999  
                             
                  21,996,585       22,629,247  
                             
Total Affiliate Investments
              $ 50,133,521     $ 47,222,059  
                             
Non-Control/Non-Affiliate Investments(7)
                           
CPAC, Inc.
  Household
Products
                       
Subordinated Term Loan, 12.5% due 6/1/2012
        1,064,910     $ 1,064,910     $ 1,064,910  
                             
                  1,064,910       1,064,910  
Vanguard Vinyl, Inc.(9)(13)(14)
  Building
Products
                       
First Lien Term Loan, 12% due 3/30/2013
        7,000,000       6,827,373       5,812,199  
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+7% (10% floor) due 3/30/2013
        1,250,000       1,207,895       1,029,268  
25,641 Shares of Series A Preferred Stock
                253,846        
25,641 Shares of Common Stock
                2,564        
                             
                  8,291,678       6,841,467  
Repechage Investments Limited
  Restaurants                        
First Lien Term Loan, 15.5% due 10/16/2011
        3,708,971       3,475,906       3,486,342  
7,500 shares of Series A Preferred Stock of Elephant & Castle, Inc. 
                750,000       354,114  
                             
                  4,225,906       3,840,456  
Traffic Control & Safety Corporation(9)
  Construction and
Engineering
                       
Second Lien Term Loan, 15% due 5/28/2015
        19,969,524       19,724,493       19,440,090  
Subordinated Loan, 15% due 5/28/2015
        4,577,800       4,577,800       4,404,746  
24,750 shares of Series B Preferred Stock
                247,500        
43,494 shares of Series D Preferred Stock(6)
                434,937        
25,000 shares of Common Stock
                2,500        
                             
                  24,987,230       23,844,836  


F-52


Table of Contents

 
Fifth Street Finance Corp.
 
Consolidated Schedule of Investments
September 30, 2010
 
                             
Portfolio Company/Type of Investment(1)(2)(5)
 
Industry
  Principal(8)     Cost     Fair Value  
 
Nicos Polymers & Grinding Inc.(9)(13)(14)
  Environmental
& facilities
services
                       
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+5% (10% floor), due 7/17/2012
        3,154,876       3,040,465       1,782,181  
First Lien Term Loan B, 13.5% due 7/17/2012
        6,180,185       5,713,125       3,347,672  
3.32% Interest in Crownbrook Acquisition I LLC
                168,086        
                             
                  8,921,676       5,129,853  
TBA Global, LLC(9)
  Advertising                        
Second Lien Term Loan B, 14.5% due 8/3/2012
        10,840,081       10,594,939       10,625,867  
53,994 Senior Preferred Shares
                215,975       215,975  
191,977 Shares A Shares
                191,977       179,240  
                             
                  11,002,891       11,021,082  
Fitness Edge, LLC
  Leisure
Facilities
                       
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+5.25% (10% floor), due 8/8/2012
        1,250,000       1,245,136       1,247,418  
First Lien Term Loan B, 15% due 8/8/2012
        5,631,547       5,575,477       5,674,493  
1,000 Common Units
                42,908       118,132  
                             
                  6,863,521       7,040,043  
Filet of Chicken(9)
  Food
Distributors
                       
Second Lien Term Loan, 14.5% due 7/31/2012
        9,316,518       9,063,155       8,964,766  
                             
                  9,063,155       8,964,766  
Boot Barn(9)
  Apparel,
accessories &
luxury goods and
Footwear
                       
Second Lien Term Loan, 14.5% due 10/3/2013
        23,545,479       23,288,566       23,477,539  
247.06 shares of Series A Preferred Stock
                247,060       71,394  
1,308 shares of Common Stock
                131        
                             
                  23,535,757       23,548,933  
Premier Trailer Leasing, Inc.(9)(13)(14)
  Trucking                        
Second Lien Term Loan, 16.5% due 10/23/2012
        18,452,952       17,063,645       4,597,412  
285 shares of Common Stock
                1,140        
                             
                  17,064,785       4,597,412  
Pacific Press Technologies, Inc.(9)
                           
Second Lien Term Loan, 14.75% due 7/10/2013
  Industrial
machinery
    10,071,866       9,798,901       9,829,869  
33,786 shares of Common Stock
                344,513       402,894  
                             
                  10,143,414       10,232,763  
Goldco, LLC
                           
Second Lien Term Loan, 17.5% due 1/31/2013
  Restaurants     8,355,688       8,259,479       8,259,479  
                             
                  8,259,479       8,259,479  
Rail Acquisition Corp.(9)
  Electronic
manufacturing
services
                       
First Lien Term Loan, 17% due 9/1/2013
        16,315,866       13,536,969       12,854,425  
First Lien Revolver, 7.85% due 9/1/2013
        5,201,103       5,201,103       5,201,103  
                             
                  18,738,072       18,055,528  
Western Emulsions, Inc.(9)
  Construction
materials
                       
Second Lien Term Loan, 15% due 6/30/2014
        17,864,713       17,475,899       17,039,751  
                             
                  17,475,899       17,039,751  
Storyteller Theaters Corporation
  Movies
& entertainment
                       
1,692 shares of Common Stock
                169       61,613  
20,000 shares of Preferred Stock
                200,000       200,000  
                             
                  200,169       261,613  

F-53


Table of Contents

 
Fifth Street Finance Corp.
 
Consolidated Schedule of Investments
September 30, 2010
 
                             
Portfolio Company/Type of Investment(1)(2)(5)
 
Industry
  Principal(8)     Cost     Fair Value  
 
HealthDrive Corporation(9)
  Healthcare
services
                       
First Lien Term Loan A, 10% due 7/17/2013
        6,662,970       6,324,339       6,488,990  
First Lien Term Loan B, 13% due 7/17/2013
        10,178,726       10,068,726       9,962,414  
First Lien Revolver, 12% due 7/17/2013
        500,000       489,000       508,967  
                             
                  16,882,065       16,960,371  
idX Corporation
  Distributors                        
Second Lien Term Loan, 14.5% due 7/1/2014
        13,588,794       13,350,633       13,258,317  
                             
                  13,350,633       13,258,317  
Cenegenics, LLC
  Healthcare
services
                       
First Lien Term Loan, 17% due 10/27/2014
        20,172,004       19,257,215       19,544,864  
414,419 Common Units(6)
                598,382       1,417,886  
                             
                  19,855,597       20,962,750  
IZI Medical Products, Inc. 
  Healthcare
technology
                       
First Lien Term Loan A, 12% due 3/31/2014
        4,449,775       4,387,947       4,406,684  
First Lien Term Loan B, 16% due 3/31/2014
        17,258,033       16,702,405       17,092,868  
First Lien Revolver, 10% due 3/31/2014(11)
              (35,000 )     (35,000 )
453,755 Preferred units of IZI Holdings, LLC
                453,755       676,061  
                             
                  21,509,107       22,140,613  
Trans-Trade, Inc. 
  Air freight
& logistics
                       
First Lien Term Loan, 15.5% due 9/10/2014
        12,751,463       12,536,099       12,549,159  
First Lien Revolver, 12% due 9/10/2014
        1,500,000       1,468,667       1,491,373  
                             
                  14,004,766       14,040,532  
Riverlake Equity Partners II, LP
  Multi-sector
holdings
                       
1.87% limited partnership interest
                33,640       33,640  
                             
                  33,640       33,640  
Riverside Fund IV, LP
  Multi-sector
holdings
                       
0.33% limited partnership interest
                135,825       135,825  
                             
                  135,825       135,825  
ADAPCO, Inc. 
  Fertilizers
& agricultural
chemicals
                       
First Lien Term Loan A, 10% due 12/17/2014
        9,000,000       8,789,498       8,806,763  
First Lien Term Loan B, 14% due 12/17/2014
        14,225,615       13,892,772       13,897,677  
First Lien Term Revolver, 10% due 12/17/2014
        4,250,000       4,012,255       4,107,420  
                             
                  26,694,525       26,811,860  
Ambath/Rebath Holdings, Inc. 
  Home
improvement
retail
                       
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+7% (10% floor) due 12/30/2014
        9,500,000       9,277,900       9,127,886  
First Lien Term Loan B, 15% due 12/30/2014
        22,423,729       21,920,479       21,913,276  
First Lien Term Revolver, LIBOR+6.5% (9.5% floor) due 12/30/2014
        1,500,000       1,432,500       1,442,696  
                             
                  32,630,879       32,483,858  
JTC Education, Inc. 
  Education
services
                       
First Lien Term Loan, LIBOR+9.5% (12.5% floor) due 12/31/2014
        31,054,688       30,243,946       30,660,049  
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+9.5% (12.5% floor) due 12/31/2014(11)
              (401,111 )     (401,111 )
                             
                  29,842,835       30,258,938  
Tegra Medical, LLC
  Healthcare
equipment
                       
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+7% (10% floor) due 12/31/2014
        26,320,000       25,877,206       26,250,475  
First Lien Term Loan B, 14% due 12/31/2014
        22,098,966       21,729,057       22,114,113  
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+7% (10% floor) due 12/31/2014(11)
              (66,667 )     (66,667 )
                             
                  47,539,596       48,297,921  

F-54


Table of Contents

 
Fifth Street Finance Corp.
 
Consolidated Schedule of Investments
September 30, 2010
 
                             
Portfolio Company/Type of Investment(1)(2)(5)
 
Industry
  Principal(8)     Cost     Fair Value  
 
Flatout, Inc. 
  Food retail                        
First Lien Term Loan A, 10% due 12/31/2014
        7,300,000       7,120,671       7,144,136  
First Lien Term Loan B, 15% due 12/31/2014
        12,862,760       12,539,879       12,644,316  
First Lien Revolver, 10% due 12/31/2014(11)
              (38,136 )     (38,136 )
                             
                  19,622,414       19,750,316  
Psilos Group Partners IV, LP
  Multi-sector
holdings
                       
2.53% limited partnership interest(12)
                       
                         
                             
Mansell Group, Inc. 
  Advertising                        
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+7% (10% floor) due 4/30/2015
        5,000,000       4,909,720       4,915,885  
First Lien Term Loan B, LIBOR+9% (13.5% floor) due 4/30/2015
        4,025,733       3,952,399       3,946,765  
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+6% (9% floor) due 4/30/2015(11)
              (36,667 )     (36,667 )
                             
                  8,825,452       8,825,983  
NDSSI Holdings, Inc. 
  Electronic
equipment
& instruments
                       
First Lien Term Loan, LIBOR+9.75% (13.75% floor) due 9/10/2014
        30,245,558       29,684,880       29,409,043  
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+7% (10% floor) due 9/10/2014
        3,500,000       3,409,615       3,478,724  
                             
                  33,094,495       32,887,767  
Eagle Hospital Physicians, Inc. 
  Healthcare
services
                       
First Lien Term Loan, LIBOR+8.75% (11.75% floor) due 8/11/2015
        8,000,000       7,783,892       7,783,892  
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+5.75% (8.75% floor) due 8/11/2015
              (64,394 )     (64,394 )
                             
                  7,719,498       7,719,498  
Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC
  Diversified
support
services
                       
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+7% (9% floor) due 8/13/2015
        15,500,000       15,171,867       15,171,867  
First Lien Term Loan B, LIBOR+10% (13% floor) due 8/13/2015
        11,014,977       10,782,174       10,782,174  
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+7% (9% floor) due 8/13/2015
        376,852       292,196       292,196  
                             
                  26,246,237       26,246,237  
Epic Acquisition, Inc. 
  Healthcare
services
                       
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+8% (11% floor) due 8/13/2015
        7,750,000       7,554,728       7,554,728  
First Lien Term Loan B, 15.25% due 8/13/2015
        13,555,178       13,211,532       13,211,532  
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+6.5% (9.5% floor) due 8/13/2015
        300,000       223,634       223,634  
                             
                  20,989,894       20,989,894  
Specialty Bakers LLC
  Food
distributors
                       
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+8.5% due 9/15/2015
        9,000,000       8,755,670       8,755,670  
First Lien Term Loan B, LIBOR+11% (13.5% floor) due 9/15/2015
        11,000,000       10,704,008       10,704,008  
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+8.5% due 9/15/2015
        2,000,000       1,892,367       1,892,367  
                             
                  21,352,045       21,352,045  
                             
Total Non-Control/Non-Affiliate Investments
              $ 530,168,045     $ 512,899,257  
                             
Total Portfolio Investments
              $ 592,496,595     $ 563,821,316  
                             
 
 
(1) All debt investments are income producing. Equity is non-income producing unless otherwise noted.
 
(2) See Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for portfolio composition by geographic region.
 
(3) Control Investments are defined by the Investment Company Act of 1940 (“1940 Act”) as investments in companies in which the Company owns more than 25% of the voting securities or maintains greater than 50% of the board representation.
 
(4) Affiliate Investments are defined by the 1940 Act as investments in companies in which the Company owns between 5% and 25% of the voting securities.
 
(5) Equity ownership may be held in shares or units of companies related to the portfolio companies.

F-55


Table of Contents

 
Fifth Street Finance Corp.
 
Consolidated Schedule of Investments
September 30, 2010
 
 
(6) Income producing through payment of dividends or distributions.
 
(7) Non-Control/Non-Affiliate Investments are defined by the 1940 Act as investments that are neither Control Investments nor Affiliate Investments.
 
(8) Principal includes accumulated PIK interest and is net of repayments.
 
(9) Interest rates have been adjusted on certain term loans and revolvers. These rate adjustments are temporary in nature due to financial or payment covenant violations in the original credit agreements, or permanent in nature per loan amendment or waiver documents. The table below summarizes these rate adjustments by portfolio company:
 
                 
Portfolio Company
 
Effective date
 
Cash interest
 
PIK interest
 
Reason
 
Nicos Polymers & Grinding, Inc. 
  February 10, 2008       + 2.0% on Term Loan A & B   Per waiver agreement
TBA Global, LLC
  February 15, 2008       + 2.0% on Term Loan B   Per waiver agreement
Vanguard Vinyl, Inc. 
  April 1, 2008   + 0.5% on Term Loan       Per loan amendment
Filet of Chicken
  January 1, 2009   + 1.0% on Term Loan       Tier pricing per waiver agreement
Boot Barn
  January 1, 2009   + 1.0% on Term Loan   + 2.5% on Term Loan   Tier pricing per waiver agreement
HealthDrive Corporation
  April 30, 2009   + 2.0% on Term Loan A       Per waiver agreement
Premier Trailer Leasing, Inc. 
  August 4, 2009   + 4.0% on Term Loan       Default interest per credit agreement
Rail Acquisition Corp. 
  May 1, 2010   − 4.5% on Term Loan   − 0.5% on Term Loan   Per restructuring agreement
Traffic Control & Safety Corp. 
  May 28, 2010   − 4.0% on Term Loan   + 1.0% on Term Loan   Per restructuring agreement
Pacific Press Technologies, Inc. 
  July 1, 2010   − 2.0% on Term Loan   − 0.75% on Term Loan   Per waiver agreement
Western Emulsions, Inc. 
  September 30, 2010       + 3.0% on Term Loan   Per loan agreement
                 
 
(10) Revolving credit line has been suspended and is deemed unlikely to be renewed in the future.
 
(11) Amounts represent unearned income related to undrawn commitments.
 
(12) Represents an unfunded commitment to fund limited partnership interest.
 
(13) Investment was on cash non-accrual status as of September 30, 2010.
 
(14) Investment was on PIK non-accrual status as of September 30, 2010.


F-56


Table of Contents

Fifth Street Finance Corp.
 
Consolidated Schedule of Investments
September 30, 2009
 
                             
Portfolio Company/Type of
                     
Investment(1)(2)(5)
 
Industry
  Principal(8)     Cost     Fair Value  
 
Control Investments(3)
                           
Lighting by Gregory, LLC (15)(16)
  Housewares & Specialties                        
First Lien Term Loan A, 9.75% due 2/28/2013
      $ 4,800,003     $ 4,728,589     $ 2,419,627  
First Lien Term Loan B, 14.5% due 2/28/2013
        7,115,649       6,906,440       3,271,480  
97.38% membership interest
                410,000        
                             
                  12,045,029       5,691,107  
                             
Total Control Investments
              $ 12,045,029     $ 5,691,107  
                             
Affiliate Investments(4)
                           
O’Currance, Inc. 
  Data Processing & Outsourced Services                        
First Lien Term Loan A, 16.875% due 3/21/2012
      $ 10,526,514     $ 10,370,246     $ 10,186,501  
First Lien Term Loan B, 16.875% due 3/21/2012
        2,765,422       2,722,952       2,919,071  
1.75% Preferred Membership Interest in O’Currance Holding Co., LLC
                130,413       130,413  
3.3% Membership Interest in O’Currance Holding Co., LLC
                250,000       53,831  
                             
                  13,473,611       13,289,816  
CPAC, Inc.(9)(16)
  Household Products                        
Second Lien Term Loan, 17.5% due 4/13/2012
        11,398,948       9,506,805       4,448,661  
Charge-off of cost basis of impaired loan(12)
                (4,000,000 )      
2,297 shares of Common Stock
                2,297,000        
                             
                  7,803,805       4,448,661  
Elephant & Castle, Inc. 
  Restaurants                        
Second Lien Term Loan, 15.5% due 4/20/2012
        8,030,061       7,553,247       7,311,604  
7,500 shares of Series A Preferred Stock
                750,000       492,469  
                             
                  8,303,247       7,804,073  
MK Network, LLC
  Healthcare technology                        
First Lien Term Loan A, 13.5% due 6/1/2012
        9,500,000       9,220,111       9,033,826  
First Lien Term Loan B, 17.5% due 6/1/2012
        5,212,692       4,967,578       5,163,544  
First Lien Revolver, Prime + 1.5% (10% floor), due 6/1/2010(10)
                     
11,030 Membership Units(6)
                771,575        
                             
                  14,959,264       14,197,370  
Martini Park, LLC(9)(16)
  Restaurants                        
First Lien Term Loan, 14% due 2/20/2013
        4,390,798       3,408,351       2,068,303  
5% membership interest
                650,000        
                             
                  4,058,351       2,068,303  
Caregiver Services, Inc. 
  Healthcare services                        
Second Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+6.85% (12% floor) due 2/25/2013
        8,570,595       8,092,364       8,225,400  
Second Lien Term Loan B, 16.5% due 2/25/2013
        14,242,034       13,440,995       13,508,338  
1,080,399 shares of Series A Preferred Stock
                1,080,398       1,206,599  
                             
                  22,613,757       22,940,337  
                             
Total Affiliate Investments
              $ 71,212,035     $ 64,748,560  
                             
Non-Control/Non-Affiliate Investments(7)
                           
Best Vinyl Acquisition Corporation(9)
  Building Products                        
Second Lien Term Loan, 12% due 3/30/2013
      $ 7,000,000     $ 6,779,947     $ 6,138,582  
25,641 Shares of Series A Preferred Stock
                253,846       20,326  
25,641 Shares of Common Stock
                2,564        
                             
                  7,036,357       6,158,908  
Traffic Control & Safety Corporation
  Construction and Engineering                        
Second Lien Term Loan, 15% due 6/29/2014
        19,310,587       19,025,031       17,693,780  
24,750 shares of Series B Preferred Stock
                247,500       158,512  
25,000 shares of Common Stock
                2,500        
                             
                  19,275,031       17,852,292  


F-57


Table of Contents

 
Fifth Street Finance Corp.
 
Consolidated Schedule of Investments
September 30, 2009
 
                             
Portfolio Company/Type of
                     
Investment(1)(2)(5)
 
Industry
  Principal(8)     Cost     Fair Value  
 
Nicos Polymers & Grinding Inc.(9)(16)
  Environmental & facilities services                        
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+5% (10% floor), due 7/17/2012
        3,091,972       3,040,465       2,162,593  
First Lien Term Loan B, 13.5% due 7/17/2012
        5,980,128       5,716,250       3,959,643  
3.32% Interest in Crownbrook Acquisition I LLC
                168,086        
                             
                  8,924,801       6,122,236  
TBA Global, LLC(9)
  Media: Advertising                        
Second Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+5% (10% floor), due 8/3/2010
        2,583,805       2,576,304       2,565,305  
Second Lien Term Loan B, 14.5% due 8/3/2012
        10,797,936       10,419,185       10,371,277  
53,994 Senior Preferred Shares
                215,975       162,621  
191,977 Shares A Shares
                191,977        
                             
                  13,403,441       13,099,203  
Fitness Edge, LLC
  Leisure Facilities                        
First Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+5.25% (10% floor), due 8/8/2012
        1,750,000       1,740,069       1,753,262  
First Lien Term Loan B, 15% due 8/8/2012
        5,490,743       5,404,192       5,321,281  
1,000 Common Units
                42,908       70,354  
                             
                  7,187,169       7,144,897  
Filet of Chicken(9)
  Food Distributors                        
Second Lien Term Loan, 14.5% due 7/31/2012
        9,307,547       8,922,946       8,979,657  
                             
                  8,922,946       8,979,657  
Boot Barn(9)
  Apparel, accessories & luxury goods and Footwear                        
Second Lien Term Loan, 14.5% due 10/3/2013
        22,518,091       22,175,818       22,050,462  
24,706 shares of Series A Preferred Stock
                247,060       32,259  
1,308 shares of Common Stock
                131        
                             
                  22,423,009       22,082,721  
Premier Trailer Leasing, Inc. (15)(16)
  Trucking                        
Second Lien Term Loan, 16.5% due 10/23/2012
        17,855,617       17,063,645       9,860,940  
285 shares of Common Stock
                1,140        
                             
                  17,064,785       9,860,940  
Pacific Press Technologies, Inc. 
  Industrial machinery                        
Second Lien Term Loan, 14.75% due 1/10/2013
        9,813,993       9,621,279       9,606,186  
33,463 shares of Common Stock
                344,513       160,299  
                             
                  9,965,792       9,766,485  
Rose Tarlow, Inc.(9)
  Home Furnishing Retail                        
First Lien Term Loan, 12% due 1/25/2014
        10,191,188       10,016,956       8,827,182  
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+4% (9% floor) due 1/25/2014(10)
        1,550,000       1,538,806       1,509,219  
0.00% membership interest in RTMH Acquisition Company(14)
                1,275,000        
0.00% membership interest in RTMH Acquisition Company(14)
                25,000        
                             
                  12,855,762       10,336,401  
Goldco, LLC
  Restaurants                        
Second Lien Term Loan, 17.5% due 1/31/2013
        8,024,147       7,926,647       7,938,639  
                             
                  7,926,647       7,938,639  
Rail Acquisition Corp. 
  Electronic manufacturing services                        
First Lien Term Loan, 17% due 4/1/2013
        15,668,956       15,416,411       15,081,138  
                             
                  15,416,411       15,081,138  
Western Emulsions, Inc. 
  Construction materials                        
Second Lien Term Loan, 15% due 6/30/2014
        11,928,600       11,743,630       12,130,945  
                             
                  11,743,630       12,130,945  

F-58


Table of Contents

 
Fifth Street Finance Corp.
 
Consolidated Schedule of Investments
September 30, 2009
 
                             
Portfolio Company/Type of
                     
Investment(1)(2)(5)
 
Industry
  Principal(8)     Cost     Fair Value  
 
Storyteller Theaters Corporation
  Movies & entertainment                        
First Lien Term Loan, 15% due 7/16/2014
        7,275,313       7,166,749       7,162,190  
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+3.5% (10% floor), due 7/16/2014
        250,000       234,167       223,136  
1,692 shares of Common Stock
                169        
20,000 shares of Preferred Stock
                200,000       156,256  
                             
                  7,601,085       7,541,582  
HealthDrive Corporation(9)
  Healthcare facilities                        
First Lien Term Loan A, 10% due 7/17/2013
        7,800,000       7,574,591       7,731,153  
First Lien Term Loan B, 13% due 7/17/2013
        10,076,089       9,926,089       9,587,523  
First Lien Revolver, 12% due 7/17/2013
        500,000       485,000       534,693  
                             
                  17,985,680       17,853,369  
idX Corporation
  Distributors                        
Second Lien Term Loan, 14.5% due 7/1/2014
        13,316,247       13,014,576       13,074,682  
                             
                  13,014,576       13,074,682  
Cenegenics, LLC
  Healthcare services                        
First Lien Term Loan, 17% due 10/27/2013
        10,372,069       10,076,277       10,266,770  
116,237 Common Units(6)
                151,108       515,782  
                             
                  10,227,385       10,782,552  
IZI Medical Products, Inc. 
  Healthcare technology                        
First Lien Term Loan A, 12% due 3/31/2014
        5,600,000       5,504,943       5,547,944  
First Lien Term Loan B, 16% due 3/31/2014
        17,042,500       16,328,120       16,532,244  
First Lien Revolver, 10% due 3/31/2014(11)
              (45,000 )     (45,000 )
453,755 Preferred units of IZI Holdings, LLC
                453,755       530,016  
                             
                  22,241,818       22,565,204  
Trans-Trade, Inc. 
  Air freight & logistics                        
First Lien Term Loan, 15.5% due 9/10/2014
        11,016,042       10,798,229       10,838,952  
First Lien Revolver, 12% due 9/10/2014(11)
              (39,333 )     (39,333 )
                             
                  10,758,896       10,799,619  
Riverlake Equity Partners II, LP(13)
  Multi-sector holdings                        
0.14% limited partnership interest
                           
                         
Riverside Fund IV, LP(13)
  Multi-sector holdings                        
0.92% limited partnership interest
                           
                         
                             
Total Non-Control/Non-Affiliate Investments
              $ 243,975,221     $ 229,171,470  
                             
Total Portfolio Investments
              $ 327,232,285     $ 299,611,137  
                             
 
 
(1) All debt investments are income producing. Equity is non-income producing unless otherwise noted.
 
(2) See Note 3 to Consolidated Financial Statements for summary geographic location.
 
(3) Control Investments are defined by the Investment Company Act of 1940 (“1940 Act”) as investments in companies in which the Company owns more than 25% of the voting securities or maintains greater than 50% of the board representation.
 
(4) Affiliate Investments are defined by the 1940 Act as investments in companies in which the Company owns between 5% and 25% of the voting securities.
 
(5) Equity ownership may be held in shares or units of companies related to the portfolio companies.
 
(6) Income producing through payment of dividends or distributions.
 
(7) Non-Control/Non-Affiliate Investments are defined by the 1940 Act as investments that are neither Control Investments nor Affiliate Investments.

F-59


Table of Contents

 
Fifth Street Finance Corp.
 
Consolidated Schedule of Investments
September 30, 2009
 
 
(8) Principal includes accumulated PIK interest and is net of repayments.
 
(9) Interest rates have been adjusted on certain term loans and revolvers. These rate adjustments are temporary in nature due to financial or payment covenant violations in the original credit agreements, or permanent in nature per loan amendment or waiver documents. The table below summarizes these rate adjustments by portfolio company:
 
                 
Portfolio Company
 
Effective date
 
Cash interest
 
PIK interest
 
Reason
 
Nicos Polymers & Grinding, Inc. 
  February 10, 2008     + 2.0% on Term Loan A & B   Per waiver agreement
TBA Global, LLC
  February 15, 2008     + 2.0% on Term Loan A & B   Per waiver agreement
Best Vinyl Acquisition Corporation
  April 1, 2008   + 0.5% on Term Loan     Per loan amendment
Martini Park, LLC
  October 1, 2008   − 6.0% on Term Loan   + 6.0% on Term Loan   Per waiver agreement
CPAC, Inc. 
  November 21, 2008     + 1.0% on Term Loan   Per waiver agreement
Rose Tarlow, Inc. 
  January 1, 2009   + 0.5% on Term Loan, + 3.0% on Revolver   + 2.5% on Term Loan   Tier pricing per waiver agreement
Filet of Chicken
  January 1, 2009   + 1.0% on Term Loan     Tier pricing per waiver agreement
Boot Barn
  January 1, 2009   + 1.0% on Term Loan   + 2.5% on Term Loan   Tier pricing per waiver agreement
HealthDrive Corporation
  April 30, 2009   + 2.0% on Term Loan A     Per waiver agreement
 
(10) Revolving credit line has been suspended and is deemed unlikely to be renewed in the future.
 
(11) Amounts represent unearned income related to undrawn commitments.
 
(12) All or a portion of the loan is considered permanently impaired and, accordingly, the charge-off of the cost basis has been recorded as a realized loss for financial reporting purposes.
 
(13) Represents unfunded limited partnership interests that were closed prior to September 30, 2009.
 
(14) Represents a de minimis membership interest percentage.
 
(15) Investment was on cash non-accrual status as of September 30, 2009.
 
(16) Investment was on PIK non-accrual status as of September 30, 2009.
 
See notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


F-60


Table of Contents

FIFTH STREET FINANCE CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
Note 1.   Organization
 
Fifth Street Mezzanine Partners III, L.P. (the “Partnership”), a Delaware limited partnership, was organized on February 15, 2007 to primarily invest in debt securities of small and middle market companies. FSMPIII GP, LLC was the Partnership’s general partner (the “General Partner”). The Partnership’s investments were managed by Fifth Street Management LLC (the “Investment Adviser”). The General Partner and Investment Adviser were under common ownership.
 
Effective January 2, 2008, the Partnership merged with and into Fifth Street Finance Corp. (the “Company”), an externally managed, closed-end, non-diversified management investment company that has elected to be treated as a business development company under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “1940 Act”). The merger involved the exchange of shares between companies under common control. In accordance with the guidance on exchanges of shares between entities under common control, the Company’s results of operations and cash flows for the year ended September 30, 2008 are presented as if the merger had occurred as of October 1, 2007. Accordingly, no adjustments were made to the carrying value of assets and liabilities (or the cost basis of investments) as a result of the merger. Fifth Street Finance Corp. is managed by the Investment Adviser. Prior to January 2, 2008, references to the Company are to the Partnership. Since January 2, 2008, references to the Company, FSC, “we” or “our” are to Fifth Street Finance Corp., unless the context otherwise requires.
 
The Company also has certain wholly-owned subsidiaries, including subsidiaries that are not consolidated for income tax purposes, which hold certain portfolio investments of the Company. The subsidiaries are consolidated with the Company, and the portfolio investments held by the subsidiaries are included in the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.
 
The Company’s shares are currently listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “FSC.” The following table reflects common stock offerings that have occurred since inception:
 
                             
Date
  Transaction   Shares     Offering price     Gross proceeds  
 
June 17, 2008
  Initial public offering     10,000,000     $ 14.12     $ 141.2 million  
July 21, 2009
  Follow-on public offering (including underwriters’ exercise of over-allotment option)     9,487,500     $ 9.25     $ 87.8 million  
September 25, 2009
  Follow-on public offering (including underwriters’ exercise of over-allotment option)     5,520,000     $ 10.50     $ 58.0 million  
January 27, 2010
  Follow-on public offering     7,000,000     $ 11.20     $ 78.4 million  
February 25, 2010
  Underwriters’ exercise of over-allotment option     300,500     $ 11.20     $ 3.4 million  
June 21, 2010
  Follow-on public offering (including underwriters’ exercise of over-allotment option)     9,200,000     $ 11.50     $ 105.8 million  
 
On February 3, 2010, the Company’s consolidated wholly-owned subsidiary, Fifth Street Mezzanine Partners IV, L.P., received a license, effective February 1, 2010, from the United States Small Business Administration, or SBA, to operate as a small business investment company, or SBIC, under Section 301(c) of the Small Business Investment Act of 1958. SBICs are designated to stimulate the flow of private equity capital to eligible small businesses. Under SBA regulations, SBICs may make loans to eligible small businesses and invest in the equity securities of small businesses.
 
The SBIC license allows the Company’s SBIC subsidiary to obtain leverage by issuing SBA-guaranteed debentures, subject to the issuance of a capital commitment by the SBA and other customary procedures. SBA-guaranteed debentures are non-recourse, interest only debentures with interest payable semi-annually and have a ten year maturity. The principal amount of SBA-guaranteed debentures is not required to be paid prior to maturity


F-61


Table of Contents

 
FIFTH STREET FINANCE CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
but may be prepaid at any time without penalty. The interest rate of SBA-guaranteed debentures is fixed on a semi-annual basis at a market-driven spread over U.S. Treasury Notes with 10-year maturities.
 
SBA regulations currently limit the amount that the Company’s SBIC subsidiary may borrow to a maximum of $150 million when it has at least $75 million in regulatory capital, receives a capital commitment from the SBA and has been through an examination by the SBA subsequent to licensing. As of September 30, 2010, the Company’s SBIC subsidiary had $75 million in regulatory capital. The SBA has issued a capital commitment to the Company’s SBIC subsidiary in the amount of $150 million, and $73 million of SBA debentures were outstanding as of September 30, 2010.
 
The SBA restricts the ability of SBICs to repurchase their capital stock. SBA regulations also include restrictions on a “change of control” or transfer of an SBIC and require that SBICs invest idle funds in accordance with SBA regulations. In addition, the Company’s SBIC subsidiary may also be limited in its ability to make distributions to the Company if it does not have sufficient capital, in accordance with SBA regulations.
 
The Company’s SBIC subsidiary is subject to regulation and oversight by the SBA, including requirements with respect to maintaining certain minimum financial ratios and other covenants. Receipt of an SBIC license does not assure that the SBIC subsidiary will receive SBA-guaranteed debenture funding and is dependent upon the SBIC subsidiary continuing to be in compliance with SBA regulations and policies.
 
The SBA, as a creditor, will have a superior claim to the SBIC subsidiary’s assets over the Company’s stockholders in the event the Company liquidates the SBIC subsidiary or the SBA exercises its remedies under the SBA-guaranteed debentures issued by the SBIC subsidiary upon an event of default.
 
The Company has applied for exemptive relief from the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) to permit it to exclude the debt of the SBIC subsidiary guaranteed by the SBA from the 200% asset coverage test under the 1940 Act. If the Company receives an exemption for this SBA debt, the Company would have increased flexibility under the 200% asset coverage test.
 
Note 2.   Significant Accounting Policies
 
FASB Accounting Standards Codification
 
The issuance of FASB Accounting Standards Codificationtm (the “Codification”) on July 1, 2009 (effective for interim or annual reporting periods ending after September 15, 2009), changes the way that U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) are referenced. Beginning on that date, the Codification officially became the single source of authoritative nongovernmental GAAP; however, SEC registrants must also consider rules, regulations and interpretive guidance issued by the SEC or its staff. The switch affects the way companies refer to GAAP in financial statements and in their accounting policies. References to standards will consist solely of the number used in the Codification’s structural organization.
 
Consistent with the effective date of the Codification, financial statements for periods ending after September 15, 2009, refer to the Codification structure, not pre-Codification historical GAAP.
 
Basis of Presentation and Liquidity:
 
The Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with GAAP and Regulation S-X. In the opinion of management, all adjustments of a normal recurring nature considered necessary for the fair presentation of the Consolidated Financial Statements have been made. The financial results of the Company’s portfolio investments are not consolidated in the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.
 
Although the Company expects to fund the growth of its investment portfolio through the net proceeds from the recent and future equity offerings, the Company’s dividend reinvestment plan, and issuances of senior securities or future borrowings, to the extent permitted by the 1940 Act, the Company cannot assure that its plans to raise capital


F-62


Table of Contents

 
FIFTH STREET FINANCE CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
will be successful. In addition, the Company intends to distribute to its stockholders between 90% and 100% of its taxable income each year in order to satisfy the requirements applicable to Regulated Investment Companies (“RICs”) under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code (“Code”). Consequently, the Company may not have the funds or the ability to fund new investments, to make additional investments in its portfolio companies, to fund its unfunded commitments to portfolio companies or to repay borrowings. In addition, the illiquidity of its portfolio investments may make it difficult for the Company to sell these investments when desired and, if the Company is required to sell these investments, it may realize significantly less than their recorded value.
 
Use of Estimates:
 
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions affecting amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. These estimates are based on the information that is currently available to the Company and on various other assumptions that the Company believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates under different assumptions and conditions. The most significant estimate inherent in the preparation of the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements is the valuation of investments and the related amounts of unrealized appreciation and depreciation.
 
The Consolidated Financial Statements include portfolio investments at fair value of $563.8 million and $299.6 million at September 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009, respectively. The portfolio investments represent 99.1% and 73.0% of net assets at September 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009, respectively, and their fair values have been determined by the Company’s Board of Directors in good faith in the absence of readily available market values. Because of the inherent uncertainty of valuation, the determined values may differ significantly from the values that would have been used had a ready market existed for the investments, and the differences could be material.
 
The Company classifies its investments in accordance with the requirements of the 1940 Act. Under the 1940 Act, “Control Investments” are defined as investments in companies in which the Company owns more than 25% of the voting securities or has rights to maintain greater than 50% of the board representation; “Affiliate Investments” are defined as investments in companies in which the Company owns between 5% and 25% of the voting securities; and “Non-Control/Non-Affiliate Investments” are defined as investments that are neither Control Investments nor Affiliate Investments.
 
Fair Value Measurements:
 
ASC 820 Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (“ASC 820”), defines fair value as that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. A liability’s fair value is defined as the amount that would be paid to transfer the liability to a new obligor, not the amount that would be paid to settle the liability with the creditor. Where available, fair value is based on observable market prices or parameters or derived from such prices or parameters. Where observable prices or inputs are not available or reliable, valuation techniques are applied. These valuation techniques involve some level of management estimation and judgment, the degree of which is dependent on the price transparency for the investments or market and the investments’ complexity.
 
Assets recorded at fair value in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Assets and Liabilities are categorized based upon the level of judgment associated with the inputs used to measure their fair value. Hierarchical levels, defined by ASC 820 and directly related to the amount of subjectivity associated with the inputs to fair valuation of these assets and liabilities, are as follows:
 
  •  Level 1 — Unadjusted, quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities at the measurement date.


F-63


Table of Contents

 
FIFTH STREET FINANCE CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
 
  •  Level 2 — Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data at the measurement date for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.
 
  •  Level 3 — Unobservable inputs that reflect management’s best estimate of what market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability at the measurement date. Consideration is given to the risk inherent in the valuation technique and the risk inherent in the inputs to the model.
 
Under ASC 820, the Company performs detailed valuations of its debt and equity investments on an individual basis, using market, income, and bond yield approaches as appropriate. In general, the Company utilizes a bond yield method for the majority of its investments, as long as it is appropriate. If, in the Company’s judgment, the bond yield approach is not appropriate, it may use the enterprise value approach, or, in certain cases, an alternative methodology potentially including an asset liquidation or expected recovery model.
 
Under the market approach, the Company estimates the enterprise value of the portfolio companies in which it invests. There is no one methodology to estimate enterprise value and, in fact, for any one portfolio company, enterprise value is best expressed as a range of fair values, from which the Company derives a single estimate of enterprise value. To estimate the enterprise value of a portfolio company, the Company analyzes various factors, including the portfolio company’s historical and projected financial results. Typically, private companies are valued based on multiples of EBITDA, cash flows, net income, revenues, or in limited cases, book value. The Company generally requires portfolio companies to provide annual audited and quarterly and monthly unaudited financial statements, as well as annual projections for the upcoming fiscal year.
 
Under the income approach, the Company generally prepares and analyzes discounted cash flow models based on projections of the future free cash flows of the business.
 
Under the bond yield approach, the Company uses bond yield models to determine the present value of the future cash flow streams of its debt investments. The Company reviews various sources of transactional data, including private mergers and acquisitions involving debt investments with similar characteristics, and assesses the information in the valuation process.
 
The Company’s Board of Directors undertakes a multi-step valuation process each quarter in connection with determining the fair value of the Company’s investments:
 
  •  The quarterly valuation process begins with each portfolio company or investment being initially valued by the deal team within the Investment Adviser responsible for the portfolio investment;
 
  •  Preliminary valuations are then reviewed and discussed with the principals of the Investment Adviser;
 
  •  Separately, independent valuation firms engaged by the Board of Directors prepare preliminary valuations on a selected basis and submit the reports to the Company;
 
  •  The deal team compares and contrasts its preliminary valuations to the preliminary valuations of the independent valuation firms;
 
  •  The deal team prepares a valuation report for the Valuation Committee of the Board of Directors;
 
  •  The Valuation Committee of the Board of Directors is apprised of the preliminary valuations of the independent valuation firms;
 
  •  The Valuation Committee of the Board of Directors reviews the preliminary valuations, and the deal team responds and supplements the preliminary valuations to reflect any comments provided by the Valuation Committee;
 
  •  The Valuation Committee of the Board of Directors makes a recommendation to the Board of Directors; and


F-64


Table of Contents

 
FIFTH STREET FINANCE CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
 
  •  The Board of Directors discusses valuations and determines the fair value of each investment in the Company’s portfolio in good faith.
 
The fair value of all of the Company’s investments at September 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009 was determined by the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors is solely responsible for the valuation of the portfolio investments at fair value as determined in good faith pursuant to the Company’s valuation policy and a consistently applied valuation process.
 
Realized gain or loss on the sale of investments is the difference between the proceeds received from dispositions of portfolio investments and their stated costs. Realized losses may also be recorded in connection with the Company’s determination that certain investments are considered worthless securities and/or meet the conditions for loss recognition per the applicable tax rules.
 
Investment Income:
 
Interest income, adjusted for amortization of premium and accretion of original issue discount, is recorded on an accrual basis to the extent that such amounts are expected to be collected. The Company stops accruing interest on investments when it is determined that interest is no longer collectible. In connection with its investment, the Company sometimes receives nominal cost equity that is valued as part of the negotiation process with the particular portfolio company. When the Company receives nominal cost equity, the Company allocates its cost basis in its investment between its debt securities and its nominal cost equity at the time of origination. Any resulting discount from recording the loan is accreted into interest income over the life of the loan.
 
Distributions of earnings from portfolio companies are recorded as dividend income when the distribution is received.
 
The Company has investments in debt securities which contain a payment-in-kind or “PIK” interest provision. PIK interest is computed at the contractual rate specified in each investment agreement and added to the principal balance of the investment and recorded as income.
 
Fee income consists of the monthly collateral management fees that the Company receives in connection with its debt investments and the accreted portion of the debt origination and exit fees. The Company capitalizes upfront loan origination fees received in connection with investments. The unearned fee income from such fees is accreted into fee income, based on the straight line method or effective interest method as applicable, over the life of the investment.
 
The Company has also structured exit fees across certain of its portfolio investments to be received upon the future exit of those investments. These fees are to be paid to the Company upon the sooner to occur of (i) a sale of the borrower or substantially all of the assets of the borrower, (ii) the maturity date of the loan, or (iii) the date when full prepayment of the loan occurs. Exit fees are fees which are earned and payable upon the exit of a debt security and, similar to a prepayment penalty, are not accrued or otherwise included in net investment income until received. The receipt of such fees as well the timing of the Company’s receipt of such fees is contingent upon a successful exit event for each of the investments.
 
Cash and Cash Equivalents:
 
Cash and cash equivalents consist of demand deposits and highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less, when acquired. The Company places its cash and cash equivalents with financial institutions and, at times, cash held in bank accounts may exceed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insured limit. Included in cash and cash equivalents is $0.9 million that is held at Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (“Wells Fargo”) in connection with the Company’s three-year credit facility. The Company is restricted in terms of access to this cash until such time as the Company submits its required monthly reporting schedules and Wells Fargo verifies the Company’s compliance per the terms of the credit agreement.


F-65


Table of Contents

 
FIFTH STREET FINANCE CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
Deferred Financing Costs:
 
Deferred financing costs consist of fees and expenses paid in connection with the closing of credit facilities and are capitalized at the time of payment. Deferred financing costs are amortized using the straight line method over the terms of the respective credit facilities. This amortization expense is included in interest expense in the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Operations.
 
Collateral posted to bank:
 
Collateral posted to bank consists of cash posted as collateral with respect to the Company’s interest rate swap. The Company is restricted in terms of access to this collateral until such swap is terminated or the swap agreement expires. Cash collateral posted is held in an account at Wells Fargo.
 
Interest Rate Swap:
 
The Company does not utilize hedge accounting and marks its interest rate swap to fair value on a quarterly basis through operations.
 
Offering Costs:
 
Offering costs consist of fees and expenses incurred in connection with the public offer and sale of the Company’s common stock, including legal, accounting, and printing fees. $1.1 million of offering costs have been charged to capital during the year ended September 30, 2010.
 
Income Taxes:
 
As a RIC, the Company is not subject to federal income tax on the portion of its taxable income and gains distributed currently to its stockholders as a dividend. The Company anticipates distributing between 90% and 100% of its taxable income and gains, within the Subchapter M rules, and thus the Company anticipates that it will not incur any federal or state income tax at the RIC level. As a RIC, the Company is also subject to a federal excise tax based on distributive requirements of its taxable income on a calendar year basis (e.g., calendar year 2010). The Company anticipates timely distribution of its taxable income within the tax rules; however, the Company incurred a de minimis federal excise tax for calendar years 2008 and 2009. In addition, the Company may incur a federal excise tax in future years.
 
The purpose of the Company’s taxable subsidiaries is to permit the Company to hold equity investments in portfolio companies which are “pass through” entities for federal tax purposes in order to comply with the “source income” requirements contained in the RIC tax requirements. The taxable subsidiaries are not consolidated with the Company for income tax purposes and may generate income tax expense as a result of their ownership of certain portfolio investments. This income tax expense, if any, is reflected in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations. The Company uses the asset and liability method to account for its taxable subsidiaries’ income taxes. Using this method, the Company recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities for the estimated future tax effects attributable to temporary differences between financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities. In addition, the Company recognizes deferred tax benefits associated with net operating carry forwards that it may use to offset future tax obligations. The Company measures deferred tax assets and liabilities using the enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which it expects to recover or settle those temporary differences.
 
ASC 740 Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes (“ASC 740”) provides guidance for how uncertain tax positions should be recognized, measured, presented, and disclosed in the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements. ASC 740 requires the evaluation of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in the course of preparing the Company’s tax returns to determine whether the tax positions are “more-likely-than-not” of being sustained by the applicable tax authority. Tax positions not deemed to meet the more-likely-than-not threshold are recorded as a tax benefit or expense in the current year. Management’s determinations regarding ASC 740 may be subject to


F-66


Table of Contents

 
FIFTH STREET FINANCE CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
review and adjustment at a later date based upon factors including, but not limited to, an ongoing analysis of tax laws, regulations and interpretations thereof. The Company recognizes the tax benefits of uncertain tax positions only where the position is “more likely than not” to be sustained assuming examination by tax authorities. Management has analyzed the Company’s tax positions, and has concluded that no liability for unrecognized tax benefits should be recorded related to uncertain tax positions taken on returns filed for open tax years 2008 or 2009 or expected to be taken in the Company’s 2010 tax return. The Company identifies its major tax jurisdictions as U.S. Federal and New York State, and the Company is not aware of any tax positions for which it is reasonably possible that the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits will change materially in the next 12 months.
 
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
 
In January 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-06, Fair Value Measurements and Improving Disclosures About Fair Value Measurements (Topic 820), which provides for improving disclosures about fair value measurements, primarily significant transfers in and out of Levels 1 and 2, and activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. The new disclosures and clarifications of existing disclosures are effective for the interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, while the disclosures about the purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the roll forward activity in Level 3 fair value measurements are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010 and for the interim periods within those fiscal years. Except for certain detailed Level 3 disclosures, which are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010 and interim periods within those years, the new guidance became effective for the Company’s fiscal 2010 second quarter. The adoption of this disclosure-only guidance is included in Note 3 — Portfolio Investments and did not have an impact on the Company’s consolidated financial results.
 
In September 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2009-12, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820) — Investments in Certain Entities That Calculate Net Asset Value per Share (or Its Equivalent) which provides guidance on estimating the fair value of an alternative investment, amending ASC 820-10. The amendment is effective for interim and annual periods ending after December 15, 2009. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on either the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.
 
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 166, “Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets — an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140” (“SFAS 166”) (to be included in ASC 860 “Transfers and Servicing”). SFAS 166 will require more information about transfers of financial assets, eliminates the qualifying special purpose entity (QSPE) concept, changes the requirements for derecognizing financial assets and requires additional disclosures. SFAS 166 is effective for the first annual reporting period that begins after November 15, 2009. The Company does not anticipate that SFAS 166 will have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. This statement has not yet been codified.
 
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) which provides guidance with respect to consolidation of variable interest entities. This statement retains the scope of Interpretation 46(R) with the addition of entities previously considered qualifying special-purpose entities, as the concept of these entities was eliminated in SFAS No. 166, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets. This statement replaces the quantitative-based risks and rewards calculation for determining the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity. The approach focuses on identifying which enterprise has the power to direct activities that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance and the obligation to absorb the losses or receive the benefits from the entity. It is possible that application of this revised guidance will change an enterprise’s assessment of involvement with variable interest entities. This statement, which has been codified within ASC 810, Consolidations, was effective for the Company as of September 1, 2010. The initial adoption did not have an effect on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.


F-67


Table of Contents

 
FIFTH STREET FINANCE CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
Note 3.   Portfolio Investments
 
At September 30, 2010, 99.1% of net assets or $563.8 million was invested in 38 long-term portfolio investments and 13.5% of net assets or $76.8 million was invested in cash and cash equivalents. In comparison, at September 30, 2009, 73.0% of net assets or $299.6 million was invested in 28 long-term portfolio investments and 27.6% of net assets or $113.2 million was invested in cash and cash equivalents. As of September 30, 2010, primarily all of the Company’s debt investments were secured by first or second priority liens on the assets of the portfolio companies. Moreover, the Company held equity investments in certain of its portfolio companies consisting of common stock, preferred stock or limited liability company interests designed to provide the Company with an opportunity for an enhanced rate of return. These instruments generally do not produce a current return, but are held for potential investment appreciation and capital gain.
 
At September 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009, $375.6 million and $281.0 million, respectively, of the Company’s portfolio debt investments at fair value were at fixed rates, which represented 67.2% and 95.0%, respectively, of the Company’s total portfolio of debt investments at fair value. During the years ended September 30, 2010, 2009 and 2008, the Company recorded realized losses of $18.8 million, $14.4 million and 0, respectively. During the years ended September 30, 2010, 2009 and 2008, the Company recorded unrealized depreciation of $1.8 million, $10.8 million and 16.9 million, respectively.
 
The composition of the Company’s investments as of September 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009 at cost and fair value was as follows:
 
                                 
    September 30, 2010     September 30, 2009  
    Cost     Fair Value     Cost     Fair Value  
 
Investments in debt securities
  $ 585,529,301     $ 558,579,951     $ 317,069,667     $ 295,921,400  
Investments in equity securities
    6,967,294       5,241,365       10,162,618       3,689,737  
                                 
Total
  $ 592,496,595     $ 563,821,316     $ 327,232,285     $ 299,611,137  
                                 
 
The following table presents the financial instruments carried at fair value as of September 30, 2010 on the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Assets and Liabilities for each of the three levels of hierarchy established by ASC 820.
 
                                 
    Level 1     Level 2     Level 3     Total  
 
Cash equivalents
  $     $     $     $  
Investments in debt securities (first lien)
                416,323,957       416,323,957  
Investments in debt securities (second lien)
                137,851,248       137,851,248  
Investments in debt securities (subordinated)
                4,404,746       4,404,746  
Investments in equity securities (preferred)
                2,892,135       2,892,135  
Investments in equity securities (common)
                2,349,230       2,349,230  
                                 
Total investments at fair value
  $     $     $ 563,821,316     $ 563,821,316  
Interest rate swap
          773,435             773,435  
                                 
Total liabilities at fair value
  $     $ 773,435     $     $ 773,435  
                                 


F-68


Table of Contents

 
FIFTH STREET FINANCE CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
The following table presents the financial instruments carried at fair value on September 30, 2009 on the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Assets and Liabilities for each of the three levels of hierarchy established by ASC 820.
 
                                 
    Level 1     Level 2     Level 3     Total  
 
Cash equivalents
  $     $     $     $  
Investments in debt securities (first lien)
                142,016,942       142,016,942  
Investments in debt securities (second lien)
                153,904,458       153,904,458  
Investments in debt securities (subordinated)
                       
Investments in equity securities (preferred)
                2,889,471       2,889,471  
Investments in equity securities (common)
                800,266       800,266  
                                 
Total investments at fair value
  $     $     $ 299,611,137     $ 299,611,137  
Interest rate swap
                       
                                 
Total liabilities at fair value
  $     $     $     $  
                                 
 
When a determination is made to classify a financial instrument within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy, the determination is based upon the fact that the unobservable factors are the most significant to the overall fair value measurement. However, Level 3 financial instruments typically include, in addition to the unobservable or Level 3 components, observable components (that is, components that are actively quoted and can be validated by external sources). Accordingly, the appreciation (depreciation) in the tables below includes changes in fair value due in part to observable factors that are part of the valuation methodology.


F-69


Table of Contents

 
FIFTH STREET FINANCE CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
The following table provides a roll-forward in the changes in fair value from September 30, 2009 to September 30, 2010, for all investments for which the Company determines fair value using unobservable (Level 3) factors.
 
                                                 
    First
    Second
    Subordinated
    Preferred
    Common
       
    Lien Debt     Lien Debt     Debt     Equity     Equity     Total  
 
Fair value as of September 30, 2009
  $ 142,016,942     $ 153,904,458     $     $ 2,889,471     $ 800,266     $ 299,611,137  
Purchases and other increases
    319,865,964       1,138,340       5,609,744             1,201,676       327,815,724  
Redemptions, repayments and other decreases
    (32,138,885 )     (12,966,681 )     (1,031,944 )           (150,000 )     (46,287,510 )
Net realized losses
    (11,405,820 )     (611,084 )                 (4,247,000 )     (16,263,904 )
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation)
    (2,014,244 )     (3,613,785 )     (173,054 )     2,664       4,744,288       (1,054,131 )
Transfers into (out of) level 3
                                   
                                                 
Fair value at September 30, 2010
  $ 416,323,957     $ 137,851,248     $ 4,404,746     $ 2,892,135     $ 2,349,230     $ 563,821,316  
                                                 
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) relating to Level 3 assets still held at September 30, 2010 and reported within net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments in the Consolidated Statement of Operations for the year ended September 30, 2010
  $ (14,247,442 )   $ (4,586,955 )   $ (173,054 )   $ 2,664     $ 497,288     $ (18,507,499 )


F-70


Table of Contents

 
FIFTH STREET FINANCE CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
The following table provides a roll-forward in the changes in fair value from September 30, 2008 to September 30, 2009, for all investments for which the Company determines fair value using unobservable (Level 3) factors.
 
                                                 
    First
    Second
    Subordinated
    Preferred
    Common
       
    Lien Debt     Lien Debt     Debt     Equity     Equity     Total  
 
Fair value as of September 30, 2008
  $ 108,247,033     $ 160,907,915     $     $ 2,430,852     $ 2,173,354     $ 273,759,154  
Purchases and other increases
    54,218,598       14,156,161                   1,091,644       69,466,403  
Redemptions, repayments and other decreases
    (9,727,499 )     (8,718,404 )                       (18,445,903 )
Net realized losses
          (14,123,200 )           (250,000 )           (14,373,200 )
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation)
    (10,721,190 )     1,681,986             708,619       (2,464,732 )     (10,795,317 )
Transfers into (out of) level 3
                                   
                                                 
Fair value at September 30, 2009
  $ 142,016,942     $ 153,904,458     $     $ 2,889,471     $ 800,266     $ 299,611,137  
                                                 
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) relating to Level 3 assets still held at September 30, 2009 and reported within net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments in the Consolidated Statement of Operations for the year ended September 30, 2009
  $ (3,365,938 )   $ (19,845,148 )   $     $ 458,619     $ (2,464,732 )   $ (25,217,199 )
 
Concurrent with its adoption of ASC 820, effective October 1, 2008, the Company augmented the valuation techniques it uses to estimate the fair value of its debt investments where there is not a readily available market value (Level 3). Prior to October 1, 2008, the Company estimated the fair value of its Level 3 debt investments by first estimating the enterprise value of the portfolio company which issued the debt investment. To estimate the enterprise value of a portfolio company, the Company analyzed various factors, including the portfolio companies historical and projected financial results. Typically, private companies are valued based on multiples of EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization), cash flow, net income, revenues or, in limited instances, book value.
 
In estimating a multiple to use for valuation purposes, the Company looked to private merger and acquisition statistics, discounted public trading multiples or industry practices. In some cases, the best valuation methodology may have been a discounted cash flow analysis based on future projections. If a portfolio company was distressed, a liquidation analysis may have provided the best indication of enterprise value.


F-71


Table of Contents

 
FIFTH STREET FINANCE CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
If there was adequate enterprise value to support the repayment of the Company’s debt, the fair value of the Level 3 loan or debt security normally corresponded to cost plus the amortized original issue discount unless the borrower’s condition or other factors lead to a determination of fair value at a different amount.
 
Beginning on October 1, 2008, the Company also introduced a bond yield model to value these investments based on the present value of expected cash flows. The significant inputs into the model are market interest rates for debt with similar characteristics and an adjustment for the portfolio company’s credit risk. The credit risk component of the valuation considers several factors including financial performance, business outlook, debt priority and collateral position.
 
The table below summarizes the changes in the Company’s investment portfolio from September 30, 2009 to September 30, 2010.
 
                         
    Debt     Equity     Total  
 
Fair value at September 30, 2009
  $ 295,921,400     $ 3,689,737     $ 299,611,137  
New investments
    324,475,743       1,051,676       325,527,419  
Redemptions/repayments
    (46,439,537 )           (46,439,537 )
Net accrual of PIK interest income
    8,385,306             8,385,306  
Accretion of original issue discount
    893,077             893,077  
Net change in unearned income
    (5,911,051 )           (5,911,051 )
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation)
    (5,801,083 )     4,746,952       (1,054,131 )
Net changes from unrealized to realized
    (12,943,904 )     (4,247,000 )     (17,190,904 )
                         
Fair value at September 30, 2010
  $ 558,579,951     $ 5,241,365     $ 563,821,316  
                         
 
The Company’s off-balance sheet arrangements consisted of $49.5 million and $9.8 million of unfunded commitments to provide debt financing to its portfolio companies or to fund limited partnership interests as of September 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009, respectively. Such commitments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit risk in excess of the amount recognized in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities and are not reflected on the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Assets and Liabilities.


F-72


Table of Contents

 
FIFTH STREET FINANCE CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
A summary of the composition of the unfunded commitments (consisting of revolvers, term loans and limited partnership interests) as of September 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009 is shown in the table below:
 
                 
    September 30, 2010     September 30, 2009  
 
Storyteller Theaters Corporation
  $     $ 1,750,000  
HealthDrive Corporation
    1,500,000       1,500,000  
IZI Medical Products, Inc. 
    2,500,000       2,500,000  
Trans-Trade, Inc. 
    500,000       2,000,000  
Riverlake Equity Partners II, LP (limited partnership interest)
    966,360       1,000,000  
Riverside Fund IV, LP (limited partnership interest)
    864,175       1,000,000  
ADAPCO, Inc. 
    5,750,000        
AmBath/ReBath Holdings, Inc. 
    1,500,000        
JTC Education, Inc. 
    9,062,453        
Tegra Medical, LLC
    4,000,000        
Vanguard Vinyl, Inc. 
    1,250,000        
Flatout, Inc. 
    1,500,000        
Psilos Group Partners IV, LP (limited partnership interest)
    1,000,000        
Mansell Group, Inc. 
    2,000,000        
NDSSI Holdings, Inc. 
    1,500,000        
Eagle Hospital Physicians, Inc. 
    2,500,000        
Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC
    3,623,148        
Epic Acquisition, Inc. 
    2,700,000        
Specialty Bakers, LLC
    2,000,000        
Rail Acquisition Corp. 
    4,798,897        
                 
Total
  $ 49,515,033     $ 9,750,000  
                 


F-73


Table of Contents

 
FIFTH STREET FINANCE CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
Summaries of the composition of the Company’s investment portfolio at cost and fair value as a percentage of total investments are shown in the following tables:
 
                                 
    September 30, 2010     September 30, 2009  
 
Cost:
                               
First lien debt
  $ 430,200,694       72.61 %   $ 153,207,248       46.82 %
Second lien debt
    150,600,807       25.42 %     163,862,419       50.08 %
Subordinated debt
    4,727,800       0.80 %           0.00 %
Purchased equity
    2,330,305       0.39 %     4,170,368       1.27 %
Equity grants
    4,467,524       0.75 %     5,992,250       1.83 %
Limited partnership interests
    169,465       0.03 %           0.00 %
                                 
Total
  $ 592,496,595       100.00 %   $ 327,232,285       100.00 %
                                 
Fair Value:
                               
First lien debt
  $ 416,323,957       73.84 %   $ 142,016,942       47.40 %
Second lien debt
    137,851,248       24.45 %     153,904,458       51.37 %
Subordinated debt
    4,404,746       0.78 %           0.00 %
Purchased equity
    625,371       0.11 %     517,181       0.17 %
Equity grants
    4,446,529       0.79 %     3,172,556       1.06 %
Limited partnership interests
    169,465       0.03 %           0.00 %
                                 
Total
  $ 563,821,316       100.00 %   $ 299,611,137       100.00 %
                                 
 
The Company invests in portfolio companies located in the United States. The following tables show the portfolio composition by geographic region at cost and fair value as a percentage of total investments. The geographic composition is determined by the location of the corporate headquarters of the portfolio company, which may not be indicative of the primary source of the portfolio company’s business.
 
                                 
    September 30, 2010     September 30, 2009  
 
Cost:
                               
Northeast
  $ 175,370,861       29.60 %   $ 103,509,164       31.63 %
West
    133,879,457       22.60 %     98,694,596       30.16 %
Southeast
    108,804,931       18.36 %     39,463,350       12.06 %
Midwest
    53,336,882       9.00 %     22,980,368       7.02 %
Southwest
    121,104,464       20.44 %     62,584,807       19.13 %
                                 
Total
  $ 592,496,595       100.00 %   $ 327,232,285       100.00 %
                                 
Fair Value:
                               
Northeast
  $ 161,264,153       28.60 %   $ 87,895,220       29.34 %
West
    131,881,487       23.39 %     93,601,893       31.24 %
Southeast
    109,457,070       19.41 %     39,858,633       13.30 %
Midwest
    53,750,018       9.53 %     22,841,167       7.62 %
Southwest
    107,468,588       19.07 %     55,414,224       18.50 %
                                 
Total
  $ 563,821,316       100.00 %   $ 299,611,137       100.00 %
                                 


F-74


Table of Contents

 
FIFTH STREET FINANCE CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
The composition of the Company’s portfolio by industry at cost and fair value as of September 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009 were as follows:
 
                                 
    September 30, 2010     September 30, 2009  
 
Cost:
                               
Healthcare services
  $ 87,443,639       14.76 %   $ 50,826,822       15.53 %
Healthcare equipment
    47,539,596       8.02 %           0.00 %
Education services
    44,901,602       7.58 %           0.00 %
Electronic equipment & instruments
    33,094,495       5.59 %           0.00 %
Home improvement retail
    32,630,879       5.51 %           0.00 %
Food distributors
    30,415,200       5.13 %     8,922,946       2.73 %
Fertilizers & agricultural chemicals
    26,694,525       4.51 %           0.00 %
Diversified support services
    26,246,237       4.43 %           0.00 %
Construction and engineering
    24,987,230       4.22 %     19,275,031       5.89 %
Apparel, accessories & luxury goods and Footwear
    23,535,757       3.97 %     22,423,009       6.85 %
Healthcare technology
    21,509,107       3.63 %     37,201,082       11.37 %
Media — Advertising
    19,828,343       3.35 %     13,403,441       4.10 %
Food retail
    19,622,414       3.31 %           0.00 %
Electronic manufacturing services
    18,738,072       3.16 %     15,416,411       4.71 %
Construction materials
    17,475,899       2.95 %     11,743,630       3.59 %
Trucking
    17,064,785       2.88 %     17,064,785       5.21 %
Air freight and logistics
    14,004,766       2.36 %     10,758,896       3.29 %
Distributors
    13,350,633       2.25 %     13,014,576       3.98 %
Data processing and outsourced services
    13,078,169       2.21 %     13,473,611       4.12 %
Restaurants
    12,485,385       2.11 %     20,288,245       6.20 %
Housewares and specialties
    12,195,029       2.06 %     12,045,029       3.68 %
Industrial machinery
    10,143,414       1.71 %     9,965,792       3.05 %
Environmental and facility services
    8,921,676       1.51 %     8,924,801       2.73 %
Building products
    8,291,678       1.40 %     7,036,357       2.14 %
Leisure facilities
    6,863,521       1.16 %     7,187,169       2.20 %
Household products
    1,064,910       0.18 %     7,803,805       2.38 %
Movies & entertainment
    200,169       0.03 %     7,601,085       2.32 %
Multi-sector holdings
    169,465       0.02 %           0.00 %
Home furnishing retail
          0.00 %     12,855,762       3.93 %
                                 
Total
  $ 592,496,595       100.00 %   $ 327,232,285       100.00 %
                                 
Fair Value:
                               
Healthcare services
  $ 89,261,760       15.83 %   $ 51,576,258       17.21 %
Healthcare equipment
    48,297,921       8.57 %           0.00 %
Education services
    42,110,738       7.47 %           0.00 %
Electronic equipment & instruments
    32,887,767       5.83 %           0.00 %
Home improvement retail
    32,483,858       5.76 %           0.00 %
Food distributors
    30,316,811       5.38 %     8,979,657       3.00 %


F-75


Table of Contents

 
FIFTH STREET FINANCE CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
                                 
    September 30, 2010     September 30, 2009  
 
Fertilizers & agricultural chemicals
    26,811,860       4.76 %           0.00 %
Diversified support services
    26,246,237       4.66 %           0.00 %
Construction and engineering
    23,844,836       4.23 %     17,852,292       5.96 %
Apparel, accessories & luxury goods and Footwear
    23,548,933       4.18 %     22,082,721       7.37 %
Healthcare technology
    22,140,613       3.93 %     36,762,574       12.27 %
Media — Advertising
    19,847,065       3.52 %     13,099,203       4.37 %
Food retail
    19,750,316       3.50 %           0.00 %
Electronic manufacturing services
    18,055,528       3.20 %     15,081,138       5.03 %
Construction materials
    17,039,751       3.02 %     12,130,945       4.05 %
Air freight and logistics
    14,040,532       2.49 %     10,799,619       3.60 %
Distributors
    13,258,317       2.35 %     13,074,682       4.36 %
Data processing and outsourced services
    12,741,012       2.26 %     13,289,816       4.44 %
Restaurants
    12,099,935       2.15 %     17,811,015       5.94 %
Industrial machinery
    10,232,763       1.81 %     9,766,485       3.26 %
Leisure facilities
    7,040,043       1.25 %     7,144,897       2.38 %
Building products
    6,841,467       1.21 %     6,158,908       2.06 %
Environmental and facility services
    5,129,853       0.91 %     6,122,236       2.04 %
Trucking
    4,597,412       0.82 %     9,860,940       3.29 %
Housewares and specialties
    3,700,000       0.66 %     5,691,107       1.90 %
Household products
    1,064,910       0.19 %     4,448,661       1.50 %
Movies & entertainment
    261,613       0.05 %     7,541,582       2.52 %
Multi-sector holdings
    169,465       0.01 %           0.00 %
Home furnishing retail
          0.00 %     10,336,401       3.45 %
                                 
Total
  $ 563,821,316       100.00 %   $ 299,611,137       100.00 %
                                 
 
The Company’s investments are generally in small and mid-sized companies in a variety of industries. At September 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009, the Company had no single investment that represented greater than 10% of the total investment portfolio at fair value. Income, consisting of interest, dividends, fees, other investment income, and realization of gains or losses on equity interests, can fluctuate upon repayment of an investment or sale of an equity interest and in any given year can be highly concentrated among several investments. For the years ended September 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009, no individual investment produced income that exceeded 10% of investment income.
 
Note 4.   Fee Income
 
The Company receives a variety of fees in the ordinary course of business. Certain fees, such as origination fees, are capitalized and amortized in accordance with ASC 310-20 Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs. In accordance with ASC 820, the net unearned fee income balance is netted against the cost of the respective investments. Other fees, such as servicing and collateral management fees, are classified as fee income and recognized as they are earned on a monthly basis.

F-76


Table of Contents

 
FIFTH STREET FINANCE CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
Accumulated unearned fee income activity for the years ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 was as follows:
 
                 
    Year Ended
    Year Ended
 
    September 30, 2010     September 30, 2009  
 
Beginning accumulated unearned fee income balance
  $ 5,589,630     $ 5,236,265  
Net fees received
    11,806,209       3,895,559  
Unearned fee income recognized
    (5,494,968 )     (3,542,194 )
                 
Ending unearned fee income balance
  $ 11,900,871     $ 5,589,630  
                 
 
As of September 30, 2010, the Company had structured $7.1 million in aggregate exit fees across 10 portfolio investments upon the future exit of those investments. These fees are to be paid to the Company upon the sooner to occur of (i) a sale of the borrower or substantially all of the assets of the borrower, (ii) the maturity date of the loan, or (iii) the date when full prepayment of the loan occurs. Exit fees are fees which are earned and payable upon the exit of a debt security and, similar to a prepayment penalty, are not accrued or otherwise included in net investment income until received. The receipt of such fees as well the timing of the Company’s receipt of such fees is contingent upon a successful exit event for each of the investments.
 
Note 5.   Share Data
 
Effective January 2, 2008, the Partnership merged with and into the Company. At the time of the merger, all outstanding partnership interests in the Partnership were exchanged for 12,480,972 shares of common stock of the Company. An additional 26 fractional shares were payable to the stockholders in cash.
 
On June 17, 2008, the Company completed an initial public offering of 10,000,000 shares of its common stock at the offering price of $14.12 per share. The net proceeds totaled $129.5 million after deducting investment banking commissions of $9.9 million and offering costs of $1.8 million.
 
On July 21, 2009, the Company completed a follow-on public offering of 9,487,500 shares of its common stock, which included the underwriters’ exercise of their over-allotment option, at the offering price of $9.25 per share. The net proceeds totaled $82.7 million after deducting investment banking commissions of $4.4 million and offering costs of $0.7 million.
 
On September 25, 2009, the Company completed a follow-on public offering of 5,520,000 shares of its common stock, which included the underwriters’ exercise of their over-allotment option, at the offering price of $10.50 per share. The net proceeds totaled $54.9 million after deducting investment banking commissions of $2.8 million and offering costs of $0.3 million.
 
On January 27, 2010, the Company completed a follow-on public offering of 7,000,000 shares of its common stock at the offering price of $11.20 per share, with 300,500 additional shares being sold as part of the underwriters’ partial exercise of their over-allotment option on February 25, 2010. The net proceeds totaled $77.5 million after deducting investment banking commissions of $3.7 million and offering costs of $0.5 million.
 
On April 20, 2010, at the Company’s 2010 Annual Meeting, the Company’s stockholders approved, among other things, amendments to the Company’s restated certificate of incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock from 49,800,000 shares to 150,000,000 shares and to remove the Company’s authority to issue shares of Series A Preferred Stock.
 
On June 21, 2010, the Company completed a follow-on public offering of 9,200,000 shares of its common stock, which included the underwriters’ exercise of their over-allotment option, at the offering price of $11.50 per share. The net proceeds totaled $100.5 million after deducting investment banking commissions of $4.8 million and offering costs of $0.5 million.


F-77


Table of Contents

 
FIFTH STREET FINANCE CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
No dilutive instruments were outstanding and therefore none were reflected in the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Assets and Liabilities at September 30, 2010. The following table sets forth the weighted average common shares outstanding for computing basic and diluted earnings per common share for the years ended September 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009:
 
                         
    Year Ended
  Year Ended
  Year Ended
    September 30,
  September 30,
  September 30,
    2010   2009   2008
 
Weighted average common shares outstanding, basic and diluted
    45,440,584       24,654,325       15,557,469  
 
The following table reflects the dividend distributions per share that the Board of Directors of the Company has declared and the Company has paid, including shares issued under the dividend reinvestment plan (“DRIP”), on its common stock from inception to September 30, 2010:
 
                                                     
    Record
  Payment
  Amount
  Cash
  DRIP Shares
  DRIP Shares
Date Declared
  Date   Date   per Share   Distribution   Issued   Value
 
 
5/1/2008
      5/19/2008       6/3/2008     $ 0.30     $ 1.9 million       133,317     $ 1.9 million  
 
8/6/2008
      9/10/2008       9/26/2008       0.31       5.1 million       196,786 (1)     1.9 million  
 
12/9/2008
      12/19/2008       12/29/2008       0.32       6.4 million       105,326       0.8 million  
 
12/9/2008
      12/30/2008       1/29/2009       0.33       6.6 million       139,995       0.8 million  
 
12/18/2008
      12/30/2008       1/29/2009       0.05       1.0 million       21,211       0.1 million  
 
4/14/2009
      5/26/2009       6/25/2009       0.25       5.6 million       11,776       0.1 million  
 
8/3/2009
      9/8/2009       9/25/2009       0.25       7.5 million       56,890       0.6 million  
 
11/12/2009
      12/10/2009       12/29/2009       0.27       9.7 million       44,420       0.5 million  
 
1/12/2010
      3/3/2010       3/30/2010       0.30       12.9 million       58,689       0.7 million  
 
5/3/2010
      5/20/2010       6/30/2010       0.32       14.0 million       42,269       0.5 million  
 
8/2/2010
      9/1/2010       9/29/2010       0.10       5.2 million       25,425       0.3 million  
 
 
(1) Shares were purchased on the open market and distributed.
 
In October 2008, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program to acquire up to $8 million of the Company’s outstanding common stock. Stock repurchases under this program were made through the open market at times and in such amounts as Company management deemed appropriate. The stock repurchase program expired December 2009. In October 2008, the Company repurchased 78,000 shares of common stock on the open market as part of its share repurchase program.
 
In October 2010, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program to acquire up to $20 million of the Company’s outstanding common stock. Stock repurchases under this program are to be made through the open market at times and in such amounts as the Company’s management deems appropriate, provided it is below the most recently published net asset value per share. The stock repurchase program expires December 31, 2011 and may be limited or terminated by the Board of Directors at any time without prior notice.
 
Note 6.   Lines of Credit
 
On November 16, 2009, Fifth Street Funding, LLC, a consolidated wholly-owned bankruptcy remote, special purpose subsidiary (“Funding”), and the Company entered into a Loan and Servicing Agreement (“Agreement”), with respect to a three-year credit facility (“Wells Fargo facility”) with Wells Fargo, as successor to Wachovia Bank, National Association (“Wachovia”), Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, as administrative agent, each of the additional institutional and conduit lenders party thereto from time to time, and each of the lender agents party thereto from time to time, in the amount of $50 million, with an accordion feature which allowed for potential future expansion of


F-78


Table of Contents

 
FIFTH STREET FINANCE CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
the facility up to $100 million. The facility bore interest at LIBOR plus 4.0% per annum and had a maturity date of November 16, 2012.
 
On May 26, 2010, the Company amended the Wells Fargo facility to expand the borrowing capacity under that facility. Pursuant to the amendment, the Company received an additional $50 million commitment, thereby increasing the size of the facility from $50 million to $100 million, with an accordion feature that allows for potential future expansion of that facility from a total of $100 million up to a total of $150 million. In addition, the interest rate of the Wells Fargo facility was reduced from LIBOR plus 4% per annum to LIBOR plus 3.5% per annum, with no LIBOR floor, and the maturity date of the facility was extended from November 16, 2012 to May 26, 2013. The facility may be extended for up to two additional years upon the mutual consent of Wells Fargo and each of the lender parties thereto.
 
In connection with the Wells Fargo facility, the Company concurrently entered into (i) a Purchase and Sale Agreement with Funding, pursuant to which the Company will sell to Funding certain loan assets it has originated or acquired, or will originate or acquire and (ii) a Pledge Agreement with Wells Fargo, pursuant to which the Company pledged all of its equity interests in Funding as security for the payment of Funding’s obligations under the Agreement and other documents entered into in connection with the Wells Fargo facility.
 
The Agreement and related agreements governing the Wells Fargo facility required both Funding and the Company to, among other things (i) make representations and warranties regarding the collateral as well as each of their businesses, (ii) agree to certain indemnification obligations, and (iii) comply with various covenants, servicing procedures, limitations on acquiring and disposing of assets, reporting requirements and other customary requirements for similar credit facilities. The Wells Fargo facility agreements also include usual and customary default provisions such as the failure to make timely payments under the facility, a change in control of Funding, and the failure by Funding or the Company to materially perform under the Agreement and related agreements governing the facility, which, if not complied with, could accelerate repayment under the facility, thereby materially and adversely affecting the Company’s liquidity, financial condition and results of operations. The Company is currently in compliance with all financial covenants under the Wells Fargo facility.
 
The Wells Fargo facility is secured by all of the assets of Funding, and all of the Company’s equity interest in Funding. The Company intends to use the net proceeds of the Wells Fargo facility to fund a portion of its loan origination activities and for general corporate purposes. Each loan origination under the facility is subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions. The Company cannot be assured that Funding will be able to borrow funds under the Wells Fargo facility at any particular time or at all. The Company had no borrowings outstanding under the Wells Fargo facility as of September 30, 2010.
 
On May 27, 2010, the Company entered into a three-year secured syndicated revolving credit facility (“ING facility”) pursuant to a Senior Secured Revolving Credit Agreement (“ING Credit Agreement”) with certain lenders party thereto from time to time and ING Capital LLC, as administrative agent. The ING facility allows for the Company to borrow money at a rate of either (i) LIBOR plus 3.5% per annum or (ii) 2.5% per annum plus an alternate base rate based on the greatest of the Prime Rate, Federal Funds Rate plus 0.5% per annum or LIBOR plus 1% per annum, and has a maturity date of May 27, 2013. The ING facility also allows the Company to request letters of credit from ING Capital LLC, as the issuing bank. The initial commitment under the ING facility is $90 million, and the ING facility includes an accordion feature that allows for potential future expansion of the facility up to a total of $150 million. The ING facility is secured by substantially all of the Company’s assets, as well as the assets of two of the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiaries, FSFC Holdings, Inc. and FSF/MP Holdings, Inc., subject to certain exclusions for, among other things, equity interests in the Company’s SBIC subsidiary and equity interests in Funding as further set forth in a Guarantee, Pledge and Security Agreement (“ING Security Agreement”) entered into in connection with the ING Credit Agreement, among FSFC Holdings, Inc., FSF/MP Holdings, Inc., ING Capital LLC, as collateral agent, and the Company. Neither the Company’s SBIC subsidiary nor Funding is party to the ING facility and their respective assets have not been pledged in connection therewith. The ING facility provides that the Company may use the proceeds and letters of credit under the facility for general corporate


F-79


Table of Contents

 
FIFTH STREET FINANCE CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
purposes, including acquiring and funding leveraged loans, mezzanine loans, high-yield securities, convertible securities, preferred stock, common stock and other investments.
 
Pursuant to the ING Security Agreement, FSFC Holdings, Inc. and FSF/MP Holdings, Inc. guaranteed the obligations under the ING Security Agreement, including the Company’s obligations to the lenders and the administrative agent under the ING Credit Agreement. Additionally, the Company pledged its entire equity interests in FSFC Holdings, Inc. and FSF/MP Holdings, Inc. to the collateral agent pursuant to the terms of the ING Security Agreement.
 
The ING Credit Agreement and related agreements governing the ING facility required FSFC Holdings, Inc., FSF/MP Holdings, Inc. and the Company to, among other things (i) make representations and warranties regarding the collateral as well as each of the Company’s businesses, (ii) agree to certain indemnification obligations, and (iii) agree to comply with various affirmative and negative covenants and other customary requirements for similar credit facilities. The ING facility documents also include usual and customary default provisions such as the failure to make timely payments under the facility, the occurrence of a change in control, and the failure by the Company to materially perform under the ING Credit Agreement and related agreements governing the facility, which, if not complied with, could accelerate repayment under the facility, thereby materially and adversely affecting the Company’s liquidity, financial condition and results of operations. The Company is currently in compliance with all financial covenants under the ING facility.
 
Each loan or letter of credit originated under the ING facility is subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions. The Company cannot be assured that it will be able to borrow funds under the ING facility at any particular time or at all.
 
Through September 30, 2010, there had been no borrowings or repayments on the ING facility.
 
As of September 30, 2010, except for assets that were funded through the Company’s SBIC subsidiary, substantially all of the Company’s assets were pledged as collateral under the Wells Fargo facility or the ING facility.
 
Interest expense for the years ended September 30, 2010, 2009 and 2008 was $1.9 million, $0.6 million, and $0.9 million, respectively.
 
Note 7.   Interest and Dividend Income
 
Interest income is recorded on an accrual basis to the extent that such amounts are expected to be collected. In accordance with the Company’s policy, accrued interest is evaluated periodically for collectability. The Company stops accruing interest on investments when it is determined that interest is no longer collectible. Distributions from portfolio companies are recorded as dividend income when the distribution is received.
 
The Company holds debt in its portfolio that contains a payment-in-kind (“PIK”) interest provision. The PIK interest, which represents contractually deferred interest added to the loan balance that is generally due at the end of the loan term, is generally recorded on the accrual basis to the extent such amounts are expected to be collected. The Company generally ceases accruing PIK interest if there is insufficient value to support the accrual or if the Company does not expect the portfolio company to be able to pay all principal and interest due. The Company’s decision to cease accruing PIK interest involves subjective judgments and determinations based on available information about a particular portfolio company, including whether the portfolio company is current with respect to its payment of principal and interest on its loans and debt securities; monthly and quarterly financial statements and financial projections for the portfolio company; the Company’s assessment of the portfolio company’s business development success, including product development, profitability and the portfolio company’s overall adherence to its business plan; information obtained by the Company in connection with periodic formal update interviews with the portfolio company’s management and, if appropriate, the private equity sponsor; and information about the general economic and market conditions in which the portfolio company operates. Based on this and other


F-80


Table of Contents

 
FIFTH STREET FINANCE CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
information, the Company determines whether to cease accruing PIK interest on a loan or debt security. The Company’s determination to cease accruing PIK interest on a loan or debt security is generally made well before the Company’s full write-down of such loan or debt security.
 
Accumulated PIK interest activity for the years ended September 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009 was as follows:
 
                 
    Year Ended
    Year Ended
 
    September 30,
    September 30,
 
    2010     2009  
 
PIK balance at beginning of period
  $ 12,059,478     $ 5,367,032  
Gross PIK interest accrued
    11,907,073       8,853,636  
PIK income reserves
    (1,903,005 )     (1,398,347 )
PIK interest received in cash
    (1,618,762 )     (428,140 )
Loan exits
    (1,143,830 )     (334,703 )
                 
PIK balance at end of period
  $ 19,300,954     $ 12,059,478  
                 
 
Five investments did not pay all of their scheduled monthly cash interest payments for the period ended September 30, 2010. As of September 30, 2010, the Company had also stopped accruing PIK interest and original issue discount (“OID”) on these five investments. At September 30, 2009, the Company had stopped accruing PIK interest and OID on five investments, including two investments that had not paid all of their scheduled monthly cash interest payments. At September 30, 2008, no investments were on non-accrual status.
 
The non-accrual status of the Company’s portfolio investments as of September 30, 2010, September 30, 2009, and September 30, 2008 was as follows:
 
                     
    September 30, 2010     September 30, 2009     September 30, 2008
 
Lighting by Gregory, LLC
    Cash non-accrual       Cash non-accrual    
CPAC, Inc. 
          PIK non-accrual    
MK Network, LLC
    Cash non-accrual          
Martini Park, LLC
          PIK non-accrual    
Vanguard Vinyl, Inc. 
    Cash non-accrual          
Nicos Polymers & Grinding, Inc. 
    Cash non-accrual       PIK non-accrual    
Premier Trailer Leasing, Inc. 
    Cash non-accrual       Cash non-accrual    
 
Non-accrual interest amounts related to the above investments for the years ended September 30, 2010, September 30, 2009 and September 30, 2008 were as follows:
 
                         
    Year ended
    Year ended
    Year ended
 
    September 30, 2010     September 30, 2009     September 30, 2008  
 
Cash interest income
  $ 5,804,101     $ 2,938,190     $  
PIK interest income
    1,903,005       1,398,347        
OID income
    328,792       402,522        
                         
Total
  $ 8,035,898     $ 4,739,059     $  
                         
 
Note 8.   Taxable Distributable Income and Dividend Distributions
 
Taxable income differs from net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations primarily due to: (1) unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments, as investment gains and losses are not included in taxable income until they are realized; (2) origination fees received in connection with investments in portfolio companies,


F-81


Table of Contents

 
FIFTH STREET FINANCE CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
which are amortized into interest income over the life of the investment for book purposes, are treated as taxable income upon receipt; (3) organizational and deferred offering costs; (4) recognition of interest income on certain loans; and (5) income or loss recognition on exited investments.
 
At September 30, 2010, the Company has a net loss carryforward of $1.5 million to offset net capital gains, to the extent provided by federal tax law. The capital loss carryforward will expire in the Company’s tax year ending September 30, 2017. During the year ended September 30, 2010, the Company realized capital losses from the sale of investments after October 31 and prior to year end (“post-October capital losses”) of $12.9 million, which for tax purposes are treated as arising on the first day of the following year.
 
Listed below is a reconciliation of “net increase in net assets resulting from operations” to taxable income for the year ended September 30, 2010.
 
         
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations
  $ 22,416,000  
Net change in unrealized depreciation
    1,828,000  
Book/tax difference due to deferred loan origination fees, net
    6,311,000  
Book/tax difference due to organizational and offering costs
    (87,000 )
Book/tax difference due to interest income on certain loans
    2,748,000  
Book/tax difference due to capital losses not recognized
    14,922,000  
Other book-tax differences
    (363,000 )
         
Taxable Distributable Income(1)
  $ 47,775,000  
         
 
 
(1) The Company’s taxable income for 2010 is an estimate and will not be finally determined until the Company files its tax return for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010. Therefore, the final taxable income may be different than the estimate.
 
As of September 30, 2010, the components of accumulated undistributed income on a tax basis were as follows:
 
         
Undistributed ordinary income, net (RIC status)
  $ 4,037,000  
Realized capital losses
    (1,539,000 )
Unrealized losses, net
    (34,606,000 )
Accumulated partnership taxable income not subject to distribution
    6,236,000  
Other book-tax differences
    (26,800,000 )
 
The Company uses the asset and liability method to account for its taxable subsidiaries’ income taxes. Using this method, the Company recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities for the estimated future tax effects attributable to temporary differences between financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities. In addition, the Company recognizes deferred tax benefits associated with net operating carry forwards that it may use to offset future tax obligations. The Company measures deferred tax assets and liabilities using the enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which it expects to recover or settle those temporary differences. The Company has recorded a deferred tax asset for the difference in the book and tax basis of certain equity investments and tax net operating losses held by its taxable subsidiaries of $1.4 million. However, this amount has been fully offset by a valuation allowance of $1.4 million, since it is more likely than not that these deferred tax assets will not be realized.
 
Distributions to stockholders are recorded on the record date. The Company is required to distribute annually to its stockholders at least 90% of its net ordinary income and net realized short-term capital gains in excess of net realized long-term capital losses for each taxable year in order to be eligible for the tax benefits allowed to a RIC under Subchapter M of the Code. The Company anticipates paying out as a dividend all or substantially all of those amounts. The amount to be paid out as a dividend is determined by the Board of Directors and is based on


F-82


Table of Contents

 
FIFTH STREET FINANCE CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
management’s estimate of the Company’s annual taxable income. The Company maintains an “opt out” dividend reimbursement plan for its stockholders.
 
To date, the Company’s Board of Directors declared the following distributions:
 
                                     
Dividend Type
  Date Declared   Record Date   Payment Date   Amount
 
 
Quarterly
      5/1/2008       5/19/2008       6/3/2008     $ 0.30  
 
Quarterly
      8/6/2008       9/10/2008       9/26/2008     $ 0.31  
 
Quarterly
      12/9/2008       12/19/2008       12/29/2008     $ 0.32  
 
Quarterly
      12/9/2008       12/30/2008       1/29/2009     $ 0.33  
 
Special
      12/18/2008       12/30/2008       1/29/2009     $ 0.05  
 
Quarterly
      4/14/2009       5/26/2009       6/25/2009     $ 0.25  
 
Quarterly
      8/3/2009       9/8/2009       9/25/2009     $ 0.25  
 
Quarterly
      11/12/2009       12/30/2008       1/29/2009     $ 0.27  
 
Quarterly
      1/12/2010       12/30/2008       1/29/2009     $ 0.30  
 
Quarterly
      5/3/2010       5/26/2009       6/25/2009     $ 0.32  
 
Quarterly
      8/2/2010       9/1/2010       9/29/2010     $ 0.10  
 
Monthly
      8/2/2010       10/6/2010       10/27/2010     $ 0.10  
 
Monthly
      8/2/2010       11/3/2010       11/24/2010     $ 0.11  
 
Monthly
      8/2/2010       12/1/2010       12/29/2010     $ 0.11  
 
For income tax purposes, the Company estimates that these distributions will be composed entirely of ordinary income, and will be reflected as such on the Form 1099-DIV for the calendar year 2010. The Company anticipates declaring further distributions to its stockholders to meet the RIC distribution requirements.
 
As a RIC, the Company is also subject to a federal excise tax based on distributive requirements of its taxable income on a calendar year basis. Because the Company did not satisfy these distribution requirements for calendar years 2008 and 2009, the Company incurred a de minimis federal excise tax for those calendar years.
 
Note 9.   Realized Gains or Losses from Investments and Net Change in Unrealized Appreciation or Depreciation from Investments
 
Realized gains or losses are measured by the difference between the net proceeds from the sale or redemption and the cost basis of the investment without regard to unrealized appreciation or depreciation previously recognized, and includes investments written-off during the period, net of recoveries. Realized losses may also be recorded in connection with the Company’s determination that certain investments are considered worthless securities and/or meet the conditions for loss recognition per the applicable tax rules. Net change in unrealized appreciation or depreciation from investments reflects the net change in the valuation of the portfolio pursuant to the Company’s valuation guidelines and the reclassification of any prior period unrealized appreciation or depreciation on exited investments.
 
During the year ended September 30, 2010, the Company recorded the following investment realization events:
 
  •  In October 2009, the Company received a cash payment in the amount of $0.1 million representing a payment in full of all amounts due in connection with the cancellation of its loan agreement with American Hardwoods Industries, LLC. The Company recorded a $0.1 million reduction to the previously recorded $10.4 million realized loss on the investment in American Hardwoods;
 
  •  In March 2010, the Company recorded a realized loss in the amount of $2.9 million in connection with the sale of a portion of its interest in CPAC, Inc.;


F-83


Table of Contents

 
FIFTH STREET FINANCE CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
 
  •  In August 2010, the Company received a cash payment of $7.6 million from Storyteller Theaters Corporation in full satisfaction of all obligations under the loan agreement. The debt investment was exited at par and no realized gain or loss was recorded on this transaction;
 
  •  In September 2010, the Company restructured its investment in Rail Acquisition Corp. Although the full amount owed under the loan agreement remained intact, the restructuring resulted in a material modification of the terms of the loan agreement. As such, the Company recorded a realized loss in the amount of $2.6 million in accordance with ASC 470-50;
 
  •  In September 2010, the Company sold its investment in Martini Park, LLC and received a cash payment in the amount of $0.1 million. The Company recorded a realized loss on this investment in the amount of $4.0 million; and
 
  •  In September 2010, the Company exited its investment in Rose Tarlow, Inc. and received a cash payment in the amount of $3.6 million in full settlement of the debt investment. The Company recorded a realized loss on this investment in the amount of $9.3 million.
 
During the year ended September 30, 2009 the Company exited its investment in American Hardwoods Industries, LLC and recorded a realized loss of $10.4 million, and recorded a $4.0 million realized loss on one of its portfolio company investments in connection with the determination that the investment was permanently impaired based on, among other things, analysis of changes in the portfolio company’s business operations and prospects. During the year ended September 30, 2008 the Company sold its equity investment in Filet of Chicken and realized a gain of $62,000.
 
During the years ended September 30, 2010, 2009 and 2008, the Company recorded net unrealized depreciation of $1.8 million, $10.8 million, and $16.9 million, respectively. For the year ended September 30, 2010, the Company’s net unrealized depreciation consisted of $18.7 million of net unrealized depreciation on debt investments and $0.8 million of net unrealized depreciation on interest rate swaps, offset by $17.2 million of reclassifications to realized losses and $0.5 million of net unrealized appreciation on equity investments.
 
Note 10.   Concentration of Credit Risks
 
The Company places its cash in financial institutions and at times such balances may be in excess of the FDIC insured limit. The Company limits its exposure to credit loss by depositing its cash with high credit quality financial institutions and monitoring their financial stability.
 
Note 11.   Related Party Transactions
 
The Company has entered into an investment advisory agreement with the Investment Adviser. Under the investment advisory agreement, the Company pays the Investment Adviser a fee for its services under the investment advisory agreement consisting of two components - a base management fee and an incentive fee.
 
Base management Fee
 
The base management fee is calculated at an annual rate of 2% of the Company’s gross assets, which includes any borrowings for investment purposes. The base management fee is payable quarterly in arrears, and will be calculated based on the value of the Company’s gross assets at the end of each fiscal quarter, and appropriately adjusted on a pro rata basis for any equity capital raises or repurchases during such quarter. The base management fee for any partial month or quarter will be appropriately prorated.
 
In addition to the proration described above, for the quarter ended September 30, 2009, the Investment Advisor waived $172,000 of the base management fee on a portion of the proceeds raised in connection with the equity offerings the Company completed in 2009 and which were held in cash or cash equivalents at September 30, 2009.


F-84


Table of Contents

 
FIFTH STREET FINANCE CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
Also, On January 6, 2010, the Company announced that the Investment Adviser had voluntarily agreed to take the following actions:
 
  •  To waive the portion of its base management fee for the quarter ended December 31, 2009 attributable to four new portfolio investments, as well as cash and cash equivalents. The amount of the management fee waived was $727,000; and
 
  •  To permanently waive that portion of its base management fee attributable to the Company’s assets held in the form of cash and cash equivalents as of the end of each quarter beginning March 31, 2010.
 
For purposes of the waiver, cash and cash equivalents is as defined in the notes to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.
 
For the years ended September 30, 2010, 2009 and 2008, base management fees were $9.3 million, $5.9 million, $4.3 million, respectively. At September 30, 2010, the Company had a liability on its Consolidated Statement of Assets and Liabilities in the amount of $2.9 million reflecting the unpaid portion of the base management fee payable to the Investment Adviser.
 
Incentive Fee
 
The incentive fee portion of the investment advisory agreement has two parts. The first part is calculated and payable quarterly in arrears based on the Company’s “Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income” for the immediately preceding fiscal quarter. For this purpose, “Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income” means interest income, dividend income and any other income (including any other fees (other than fees for providing managerial assistance), such as commitment, origination, structuring, diligence and consulting fees or other fees that the Company receives from portfolio companies) accrued during the fiscal quarter, minus the Company’s operating expenses for the quarter (including the base management fee, expenses payable under the Company’s administration agreement with FSC, Inc., and any interest expense and dividends paid on any issued and outstanding indebtedness or preferred stock, but excluding the incentive fee). Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income includes, in the case of investments with a deferred interest feature (such as original issue discount, debt instruments with PIK interest and zero coupon securities), accrued income that the Company has not yet received in cash. Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income does not include any realized capital gains, realized capital losses or unrealized capital appreciation or depreciation. Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income, expressed as a rate of return on the value of the Company’s net assets at the end of the immediately preceding fiscal quarter, will be compared to a “hurdle rate” of 2% per quarter (8% annualized), subject to a “catch-up” provision measured as of the end of each fiscal quarter. The Company’s net investment income used to calculate this part of the incentive fee is also included in the amount of its gross assets used to calculate the 2% base management fee. The operation of the incentive fee with respect to the Company’s Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income for each quarter is as follows:
 
  •  No incentive fee is payable to the Investment Adviser in any fiscal quarter in which the Company’s Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income does not exceed the hurdle rate of 2% (the “preferred return” or “hurdle”);
 
  •  100% of the Company’s Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income with respect to that portion of such Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income, if any, that exceeds the hurdle rate but is less than or equal to 2.5% in any fiscal quarter (10% annualized) is payable to the Investment Adviser. The Company refers to this portion of its Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income (which exceeds the hurdle rate but is less than or equal to 2.5%) as the “catch-up.” The “catch-up” provision is intended to provide the Investment Adviser with an incentive fee of 20% on all of the Company’s Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income as if a hurdle rate did not apply when the Company’s Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income exceeds 2.5% in any fiscal quarter; and


F-85


Table of Contents

 
FIFTH STREET FINANCE CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
 
  •  20% of the amount of the Company’s Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income, if any, that exceeds 2.5% in any fiscal quarter (10% annualized) is payable to the Investment Adviser once the hurdle is reached and the catch-up is achieved (20% of all Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income thereafter is allocated to the Investment Adviser).
 
The second part of the incentive fee will be determined and payable in arrears as of the end of each fiscal year (or upon termination of the investment advisory agreement, as of the termination date), commencing on September 30, 2008, and will equal 20% of the Company’s realized capital gains, if any, on a cumulative basis from inception through the end of each fiscal year, computed net of all realized capital losses and unrealized capital depreciation on a cumulative basis, less the aggregate amount of any previously paid capital gain incentive fees.
 
For the years ended September 30, 2010, 2009 and 2008, incentive fees were $10.8 million, $7.8 million and $4.1 million, respectively. At September 30, 2010, the Company had a liability on its Consolidated Statement of Assets and Liabilities in the amount of $2.9 million reflecting the unpaid portion of the incentive fee payable to the Investment Adviser.
 
Transaction fees
 
Prior to the merger of the Partnership with and into the Company, which occurred on January 2, 2008, the Investment Adviser received 20% of transaction origination fees. For the year ended September 30, 2008, payments for the transaction fees paid to the Investment Adviser amounted to approximately $0.2 million and were expensed as incurred.
 
Indemnification
 
The investment advisory agreement provides that, absent willful misfeasance, bad faith or gross negligence in the performance of their respective duties or by reason of the reckless disregard of their respective duties and obligations, the Company’s Investment Adviser and its officers, managers, agents, employees, controlling persons, members (or their owners) and any other person or entity affiliated with it, are entitled to indemnification from the Company for any damages, liabilities, costs and expenses (including reasonable attorneys’ fees and amounts reasonably paid in settlement) arising from the rendering of the Investment Adviser’s services under the investment advisory agreement or otherwise as the Company’s Investment Adviser.
 
Administration Agreement
 
The Company has also entered into an administration agreement with FSC, Inc. under which FSC, Inc. provides administrative services for the Company, including office facilities and equipment, and clerical, bookkeeping and recordkeeping services at such facilities. Under the administration agreement, FSC, Inc. also performs or oversees the performance of the Company’s required administrative services, which includes being responsible for the financial records which the Company is required to maintain and preparing reports to the Company’s stockholders and reports filed with the SEC. In addition, FSC, Inc. assists the Company in determining and publishing the Company’s net asset value, overseeing the preparation and filing of the Company’s tax returns and the printing and dissemination of reports to the Company’s stockholders, and generally overseeing the payment of the Company’s expenses and the performance of administrative and professional services rendered to the Company by others. For providing these services, facilities and personnel, the Company reimburses FSC, Inc. the allocable portion of overhead and other expenses incurred by FSC, Inc. in performing its obligations under the administration agreement, including rent and the Company’s allocable portion of the costs of compensation and related expenses of the Company’s chief financial officer and chief compliance officer and their staff. FSC, Inc. has voluntarily determined to forgo receiving reimbursement for the services performed for the Company by its chief compliance officer, Bernard D. Berman, given his compensation arrangement with the Investment Adviser. However, although FSC, Inc. currently intends to forgo its right to receive such reimbursement, it is under no obligation to do so and may cease to do so at any time in the future. FSC, Inc. may also provide, on the Company’s behalf, managerial


F-86


Table of Contents

 
FIFTH STREET FINANCE CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
assistance to the Company’s portfolio companies. The administration agreement may be terminated by either party without penalty upon 60 days’ written notice to the other party.
 
For the year ended September 30, 2010, the Company accrued administrative expenses of $2.4 million, including $1.1 million of general and administrative expenses, that are due to FSC, Inc. At September 30, 2010, $1.1 million was included in Due to FSC, Inc. in the Consolidated Statement of Assets and Liabilities.
 
Note 12.   Financial Highlights
 
                         
    Year Ended
    Year Ended
    Year Ended
 
    September 30,
    September 30,
    September 30,
 
    2010(1)     2009(1)     2008(1)(2)  
 
Per Share Data(3):
                       
Net asset value at beginning of period
  $ 10.84     $ 13.02     $ 8.56  
Net investment income
    0.95       1.27       0.89  
Net unrealized depreciation on investments and interest rate swap
    (0.04 )     (0.44 )     (0.75 )
Net realized loss on investments
    (0.42 )     (0.58 )      
Dividends paid
    (0.96 )     (1.20 )     (0.61 )
Issuance of common stock
    0.06       (1.21 )     2.11  
Repurchases of common stock
          (0.02 )      
Capital contributions from partners
                2.94  
Capital withdrawals by partners
                (0.12 )
                         
Net asset value at end of period
  $ 10.43     $ 10.84     $ 13.02  
                         
Per share market value at beginning of period
  $ 10.93     $ 10.05     $ 12.12  
Per share market value at end of period
  $ 11.14     $ 10.93     $ 10.05  
Total return(4)
    11.22 %     26.86 %     (13.90 )%
Common shares outstanding at beginning of period
    37,878,987       22,614,289        
Common shares outstanding at end of period
    54,550,290       37,878,987       22,614,289  
Net assets at beginning of period
    410,556,071       294,335,839       106,815,695  
Net assets at end of period
    569,172,105       410,556,071       294,335,839  
Average net assets(5)
    479,003,947       291,401,218       205,932,850  
Ratio of net investment income to average net assets
    8.98 %     10.76 %     9.78 %
Ratio of total expenses to average net assets
    5.74 %     6.34 %     6.35 %
Ratio of portfolio turnover to average investments at fair value
    2.24 %     0.00 %     0.00 %
Weighted average outstanding debt(6)
    22,591,839       5,019,178       11,887,427  
Average debt per share
  $ 0.50     $ 0.20     $ 0.76  
 
 
(1) The amounts reflected in the financial highlights above represent net assets, income and expense ratios for all stockholders.
 
(2) Per share data for the year ended September 30, 2008 presumes the issuance of the 12,480,972 common shares at October 1, 2007 which were actually issued on January 2, 2008 in connection with the merger described above.
 
(3) Based on actual shares outstanding at the end of the corresponding period or weighted average shares outstanding for the period, as appropriate.
 
(4) Total return equals the increase or decrease of ending market value over beginning market value, plus distributions, divided by the beginning market value, assuming dividend reinvestment prices obtained under the Company’s dividend reinvestment plan. Total return is not annualized during interim periods.
 
(5) Calculated based upon the weighted average net assets for the period.
 
(6) Calculated based upon the weighted average of loans payable for the period.


F-87


Table of Contents

 
FIFTH STREET FINANCE CORP.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
 
Note 13.   Preferred Stock
 
The Company’s restated certificate of incorporation had not authorized any shares of preferred stock. However, on April 4, 2008, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a certificate of amendment to its restated certificate of incorporation reclassifying 200,000 shares of its common stock as shares of non-convertible, non-participating preferred stock, with a par value of $0.01 and a liquidation preference of $500 per share (“Series A Preferred Stock”) and authorizing the issuance of up to 200,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock. The Company’s certificate of amendment was also approved by the holders of a majority of the shares of its outstanding common stock through a written consent first solicited on April 7, 2008. On April 24, 2008, the Company filed its certificate of amendment and on April 25, 2008, it sold 30,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock to a company controlled by Bruce E. Toll, one of the Company’s directors at that time. During the year ended September 30, 2008, the Company paid dividends of $234,000 on the 30,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock. The dividend payment is considered and included in interest expense for accounting purposes since the preferred stock has a mandatory redemption feature. On June 30, 2008, the Company redeemed 30,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock at the mandatory redemption price of 101% of the liquidation preference or $15,150,000. The $150,000 is considered and included in interest expense for accounting purposes due to the stock’s mandatory redemption feature.
 
On April 20, 2010, at the Company’s 2010 Annual Meeting, the Company’s stockholders approved, among other things, amendments to the Company’s restated certificate of incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock from 49,800,000 shares to 150,000,000 shares and to remove the Company’s authority to issue shares of Series A Preferred Stock.
 
Note 14.   Interest Rate Swaps
 
In August 2010, the Company entered into a three-year interest rate swap agreement to mitigate its exposure to adverse fluctuations in interest rates for a total notional amount of $100.0 million. Under the interest rate swap agreement, the Company will pay a fixed interest rate of 0.99% and receive a floating rate based on the prevailing one-month LIBOR, which as of September 30, 2010 was 0.26%. For the year ended September 30, 2010, the Company recorded $0.8 million of unrealized depreciation related to this swap agreement. As of September 30, 2010, this swap agreement had a fair value of $(0.8 million), which is included in “accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities” in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Assets and Liabilities.
 
As of September 30, 2010, the Company has posted $1.9 million of cash as collateral with respect to the interest rate swap. The Company is restricted in terms of access to this collateral until such swap is terminated or the swap agreement expires. Cash collateral posted is held in an account at Wells Fargo.
 
Swaps contain varying degrees of off-balance sheet risk which could result from changes in the market values of underlying assets, indices or interest rates and similar items. As a result, the amounts recognized in the Consolidated Statement of Assets and Liabilities at any given date may not reflect the total amount of potential losses that the Company could ultimately incur.


F-88


Table of Contents

Schedule 12-14
 
Fifth Street Finance Corp.
 
Schedule of Investments in and Advances to Affiliates
 
                                         
    Amount of
                         
    Interest,
                         
    Fees or
                      Fair Value
 
    Dividends
    Fair Value
                at
 
    Credited in
    at October 1,
    Gross
    Gross
    September 30,
 
Portfolio Company/Type of Investment(1)
  Income(2)     2009     Additions(3)     Reductions(4)     2010  
 
Control Investments
                                       
Lighting by Gregory, LLC
                                       
First Lien Term Loan A, 9.75% due 2/28/2013
  $ 82,486     $ 2,419,627     $     $ (915,911 )   $ 1,503,716  
First Lien Term Loan B, 14.5% due 2/28/2013
    100,341       3,271,480             (1,075,196 )     2,196,284  
First Lien Bridge Loan, 8% due 10/15/2010
                150,000       (150,000 )      
97.38% membership interest
                             
                                         
Total Control Investments
  $ 182,827     $ 5,691,107     $ 150,000     $ (2,141,107 )   $ 3,700,000  
                                         
Affiliate Investments
                                       
O’Currance, Inc.
                                       
First Lien Term Loan A, 16.875% due 3/21/2012
    1,928,958       10,186,501       899,299       (280,025 )     10,805,775  
First Lien Term Loan B, 16.875% due 3/21/2012
    420,577       2,919,071       152,040       (1,174,466 )     1,896,645  
1.75% Preferred Membership Interest in O’Currance Holding Co., LLC
          130,413             (91,821 )     38,592  
3.3% Membership Interest in O’Currance Holding Co., LLC
          53,831             (53,831 )      
CPAC, Inc.
                                       
Second Lien Term Loan, 17.5% due 4/13/2012
    1,234,701       4,448,661       3,625,144       (8,073,805 )      
2,297 shares of Common Stock
                             
Elephant & Castle, Inc.
                                       
Second Lien Term Loan, 15.5% due 4/20/2012
    68,289       7,311,604       309,935       (7,621,539 )      
7,500 shares of Series A Preferred Stock
          492,469             (492,469 )      
MK Network, LLC
                                       
First Lien Term Loan A, 13.5% due 6/1/2012
    1,460,576       9,033,826       510,044       (1,630,730 )     7,913,140  
First Lien Term Loan B, 17.5% due 6/1/2012
    957,980       5,163,544       334,625       (1,559,509 )     3,938,660  
First Lien Revolver, Prime + 1.5% (10% floor), due 6/1/2010
                             
11,030 Membership Units
                             
Martini Park, LLC
                                       
First Lien Term Loan, 14% due 2/20/2013
    228,975       2,068,303       3,631,618       (5,699,921 )      
5% membership interest
                650,000       (650,000 )      
Caregiver Services, Inc.
                                       
Second Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+6.85% (12% floor) due 2/25/2013
    1,084,474       8,225,400       372,270       (1,484,048 )     7,113,622  
Second Lien Term Loan B, 16.5% due 2/25/2013
    2,894,827       13,508,338       1,355,767       (684,479 )     14,179,626  
1,080,399 shares of Series A Preferred Stock
          1,206,599       129,400             1,335,999  
                                         
Total Affiliate Investments
  $ 10,279,357     $ 64,748,560     $ 11,970,142     $ (29,496,643 )   $ 47,222,059  
                                         
Total Control & Affiliate Investments
  $ 10,462,184     $ 70,439,667     $ 12,120,142     $ (31,637,750 )   $ 50,922,059  
                                         
 
This schedule should be read in connection with the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements, including the Schedules of Investments and Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.


F-89


Table of Contents

 
(1) The principal amount and ownership detail as shown in the Consolidated Schedules of Investments.
 
(2) Represents the total amount of interest, fees and dividends credited to income for the portion of the year an investment was included in the Control or Non-Control/Non-Affiliate categories, respectively.
 
(3) Gross additions include increases in the cost basis of investments resulting from new portfolio investments, follow-on Investments and accrued PIK interest, and the exchange of one or more existing securities for one or more new securities. Gross additions also include net increases in unrealized appreciation or net decreases in unrealized depreciation as well as the movement of an existing portfolio company into this category or out of a different category.
 
(4) Gross reductions include decreases in the cost basis of investment resulting from principal payments or sales and exchanges of one or more existing securities for one or more new securities. Gross reductions also include net increases in unrealized depreciation or net decreases in unrealized appreciation as well as the movement of an existing portfolio company out of this category and into a different category.


F-90


Table of Contents

Schedule 12-14
 
Fifth Street Finance Corp.
 
Schedule of Investments in and Advances to Affiliates
 
                                         
    Amount of
                         
    Interest,
                         
    Fees or
                      Fair Value
 
    Dividends
    Fair Value
                at
 
    Credited in
    at October 1,
    Gross
    Gross
    September 30,
 
Portfolio Company/Type of Investment(1)
  Income(2)     2008     Additions(3)     Reductions(4)     2009  
 
Control Investments
                                       
Lighting by Gregory, LLC
                                       
First Lien Term Loan A, 9.75% due 2/28/2013
  $     $     $ 3,044,732     $ (625,105 )   $ 2,419,627  
First Lien Term Loan B, 14.5% due 2/28/2013
                4,138,390       (866,910 )     3,271,480  
97.38% membership interest
                300,000       (300,000 )      
                                         
Total Control Investments
  $     $     $ 7,483,122     $ (1,792,015 )   $ 5,691,107  
                                         
Affiliate Investments
                                       
O’Currance, Inc.
                                       
First Lien Term Loan A, 16.875% due 3/21/2012
    1,856,153       9,888,488       511,758       (213,745 )     10,186,501  
First Lien Term Loan B, 16.875% due 3/21/2012
    573,147       3,581,245       367,826       (1,030,000 )     2,919,071  
1.75% Preferred Membership Interest in O’Currance Holding Co., LLC
          130,413                   130,413  
3.3% Membership Interest in O’Currance Holding Co., LLC
          97,156             (43,325 )     53,831  
CPAC, Inc.
                                       
Second Lien Term Loan, 17.5% due 4/13/2012
    1,318,008       3,626,497       4,932,164       (4,110,000 )     4,448,661  
2,297 shares of Common Stock
                             
Elephant & Castle, Inc.
                                       
Second Lien Term Loan, 15.5% due 4/20/2012
    1,472,389       7,145,198       449,845       (283,439 )     7,311,604  
7,500 shares of Series A Preferred Stock
          196,386       296,083             492,469  
MK Network, LLC
                                       
First Lien Term Loan A, 13.5% due 6/1/2012
    1,462,272       9,115,152       161,959       (243,285 )     9,033,826  
First Lien Term Loan B, 17.5% due 6/1/2012
    872,070             5,581,544       (418,000 )     5,163,544  
First Lien Revolver, Prime + 1.5% (10% floor), due 6/1/2010
    17,111       (11,113 )     17,113       (6,000 )      
11,030 Membership Units
          760,441       186,780       (947,221 )      
Rose Tarlow, Inc.
                                       
First Lien Term Loan, 12% due 1/25/2014
    1,128,302       9,796,648       177,084       (9,973,732 )      
First Lien Revolver, LIBOR+4% (9% floor) due 1/25/2014
    123,460       323,333       1,214,827       (1,538,160 )      
6.9% membership interest in RTMH Acquisition Company
          591,939             (591,939 )      
0.1% membership interest in RTMH Acquisition Company
          11,607             (11,607 )      
Martini Park, LLC
                                       
First Lien Term Loan, 14% due 2/20/2013
    475,732       2,719,236       220,000       (870,933 )     2,068,303  
5% membership interest
                             
Caregiver Services, Inc.
                                       
Second Lien Term Loan A, LIBOR+6.85% (12% floor) due 2/25/2013
    1,263,662       9,381,973       288,785       (1,445,358 )     8,225,400  
Second Lien Term Loan B, 16.5% due 2/25/2013
    2,806,310       12,811,951       1,101,389       (405,002 )     13,508,338  
1,080,399 shares of Series A Preferred Stock
          1,183,867       22,732             1,206,599  
                                         
Total Affiliate Investments
  $ 13,368,616     $ 71,350,417     $ 15,529,889     $ (22,131,746 )   $ 64,748,560  
                                         
Total Control & Affiliate Investments
  $ 13,368,616     $ 71,350,417     $ 23,013,011     $ (23,923,761 )   $ 70,439,667  
                                         


F-91


Table of Contents

This schedule should be read in connection with the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements, including the Schedules of Investments and Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
 
 
(1) The principal amount and ownership detail as shown in the Consolidated Schedules of Investments.
 
(2) Represents the total amount of interest, fees and dividends credited to income for the portion of the year an investment was included in the Control or Non-Control/Non-Affiliate categories, respectively.
 
(3) Gross additions include increases in the cost basis of investments resulting from new portfolio investments, follow-on Investments and accrued PIK interest, and the exchange of one or more existing securities for one or more new securities. Gross additions also include net increases in unrealized appreciation or net decreases in unrealized depreciation as well as the movement of an existing portfolio company into this category or out of a different category.
 
(4) Gross reductions include decreases in the cost basis of investment resulting from principal payments or sales and exchanges of one or more existing securities for one or more new securities. Gross reductions also include net increases in unrealized depreciation or net decreases in unrealized appreciation as well as the movement of an existing portfolio company out of this category and into a different category.


F-92


Table of Contents

 
 
Fifth Street Finance Corp.
 
5,000,000 Shares
 
Common Stock
 
 
PRELIMINARY PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT
 
 
 
UBS Investment Bank
RBC Capital Markets
Deutsche Bank Securities
 
          , 2011